Automated Urinary Chemokine Assays for Noninvasive Detection of Kidney Transplant Rejection: A Prospective Cohort Study

Current and emerging tools for simultaneous assessment of infection and rejection risk in transplantation

Infection and rejection are major complications that impact transplant longevity and recipient survival. Balancing their risks is a significant challenge for clinicians. Current strategies aimed at interrogating the degree of immune deficiency or activation and their attendant risks of infection and rejection are imprecise. These include immune (cell counts, function and subsets, immunoglobulin levels) and non-immune (drug levels, viral loads) markers. The shared risk factors between infection and rejection and the bidirectional and intricate relationship between both entities further complicate transplant recipient care and decision-making. Understanding the dynamic changes in the underlying net state of immunity and the overall risk of both complications in parallel is key to optimizing outcomes. The allograft biopsy is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of rejection but is associated with inherent risks that warrant careful consideration. Several biomarkers, in particular, donor derived cell-free-DNA and urinary chemokines (CXCL9 and CXCL10), show significant promise in improving subclinical and clinical rejection risk prediction, which may reduce the need for allograft biopsies in some situations. Integrating conventional and emerging risk assessment tools can help stratify the individual's short- and longer-term infection and rejection risks in parallel. Individuals identified as having a low risk of rejection may tolerate immunosuppression wean to reduce medication-related toxicity. Serial monitoring following immunosuppression reduction or escalation with minimally invasive tools can help mitigate infection and rejection risks and allow for timely diagnosis and treatment of these complications, ultimately improving allograft and patient outcomes.

miRNAs, dd-cf-DNA, and Chemokines as Potential Noninvasive Biomarkers for the Assessment of Clinical Graft Evolution and Personalized Immunosuppression Requirement in Solid Organ Transplantation

ABSTRACT

The use of noninvasive biomarkers may reduce the need for biopsy and guide immunosuppression adjustments during transplantation. The scientific community in solid organ transplantation currently considers that chemokines, T- and B-cell immunophenotypes, and gene expression, among other molecular biomarkers, have great potential as diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for graft evolution; however, in clinical practice, few valid early biomarkers have emerged. This review focuses on the most relevant scientific advances in this field in the last 5 years regarding the role of 3 biomarkers: miRNAs, chemokines, and ddcf-DNA, in both adult and pediatric populations. An update was provided on the scores based on the combination of these biomarkers. The most-featured articles were identified through a literature search of the PubMed database. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the potential clinical applications of these biomarkers in the diagnosis and prediction of graft outcomes and discusses the reasons why none have been implemented in clinical practice to date. Translating these biomarkers into routine clinical practice and combining them with pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetic monitoring is challenging; however, it is the key to present/future individualized immunosuppressive therapies. It is essential that they be shown to be applicable and robust in real-life patient conditions and properly evaluate their added value when combined with the standard-of-care factor monitoring for graft clinical assessment. Partnership strategies among scientists, academic institutions, consortia, including expert working groups and scientific societies, and pharmaceutical and/or biotechnology companies should promote the development of prospective, randomized, multicenter intervention studies for adequate clinical validation of these biomarkers and their monitoring frequency, and their commercialization to make them available to transplant physicians.

Application of spatial-omics to the classification of kidney biopsy samples in transplantation

Improvement of long-term outcomes through targeted treatment is a primary concern in kidney transplant medicine. Currently, the validation of a rejection diagnosis and subsequent treatment depends on the histological assessment of allograft biopsy samples, according to the Banff classification system. However, the lack of (early) disease-specific tissue markers hinders accurate diagnosis and thus timely intervention. This challenge mainly results from an incomplete understanding of the pathophysiological processes underlying late allograft failure. Integration of large-scale multimodal approaches for investigating allograft biopsy samples might offer new insights into this pathophysiology, which are necessary for the identification of novel therapeutic targets and the development of tailored immunotherapeutic interventions. Several omics technologies - including transcriptomic, proteomic, lipidomic and metabolomic tools (and multimodal data analysis strategies) - can be applied to allograft biopsy investigation. However, despite their successful application in research settings and their potential clinical value, several barriers limit the broad implementation of many of these tools into clinical practice. Among spatial-omics technologies, mass spectrometry imaging, which is under-represented in the transplant field, has the potential to enable multi-omics investigations that might expand the insights gained with current clinical analysis technologies.

Biomarkers of Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Alloimmune injury is a major cause of long-term kidney allograft failure whether due to functionally stable (subclinical) or overt clinical rejection. These episodes may be mediated by immune cells (cellular rejection) or alloantibody (antibody-mediated rejection). Early recognition of immune injury is needed for timely appropriate intervention to maintain graft functional viability. However, the conventional measure of kidney function (ie, serum creatinine) is insufficient for immune monitoring due to limited sensitivity and specificity for rejection. As a result, there is need for biomarkers that more sensitively detect the immune response to the kidney allograft. Recently, several biomarkers have been clinically implemented into the care of kidney transplant recipients. These biomarkers attempt to achieve multiple goals including (1) more sensitive detection of clinical and subclinical rejection, (2) predicting impending rejection, (3) monitoring for the adequacy of treatment response, and (4) facilitating personalized immunosuppression. In this review, we summarize the findings to date in commercially available biomarkers, along with biomarkers approaching clinical implementation. While we discuss the analytical and clinical validity of these biomarkers, we identify the challenges and limitations to widespread biomarker use, including the need for biomarker-guided prospective studies to establish evidence of clinical utility of these new assays.

Perspective: metabolomics has the potential to change the landscape of kidney transplantation diagnostics

Kidney transplantation is the most efficient renal replacement therapy. Current diagnostics for monitoring graft health are either invasive or lack precision. Metabolomics is an emerging discipline focused on the analysis of the small molecules involved in metabolism. Given the kidneys' central role in metabolic homeostasis and previous observations of altered metabolites correlating with restricted kidney graft function, metabolomics is highly promising for the discovery of novel biomarkers and the development of novel diagnostics. In this perspective, we summarize the known metabolic roles for the kidney, discuss biomarkers of graft health and immune status emerging from metabolomics research, and provide our perspective on how these and future findings can be integrated in clinical practice to enable precision diagnostics.

Urinary CXCL-10, a prognostic biomarker for kidney graft injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The challenges of long-term graft survival and the side effects of current immunosuppressive therapies in kidney transplantation highlight the need for improved drugs with fewer adverse effects. Biomarkers play a crucial role in quickly detecting post-transplant complications, with new biomarkers showing promise for ongoing monitoring of disease and potentially reducing the need for unnecessary invasive biopsies. The chemokines such as C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), are particularly promising protein biomarkers for acute renal rejection, with urine samples being a desirable source for biomarkers. The aim of this review is to analyze the literature on the potential role of urinary CXCL10 protein in predicting kidney graft injuries. The results of this study demonstrate that evaluating urinary CXCL10 levels is more successful in identifying post-transplant injuries compared to assessing the CXCL10/Cr ratio.

Transforming kidney transplant monitoring with urine CXCL9 and CXCL10: practical clinical implementation

In kidney transplant recipients, urine CXCL9 and CXCL10 (uCXCL9/10) chemokines have reached a sufficiently high level of evidence to be recommended by the European Society of Organ Transplantation for the monitoring of immune quiescence. To assess the risk of acute rejection (AR), the advantage of uCXCL9/10 is their cost-effectiveness and their high diagnostic performance. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of a next-generation immunoassay for quantifying uCXCL9/10 levels. It demonstrated high efficiency with minimal workflow and a 90-min time to result. Preanalytical studies indicated stability of uCXCL9/10 levels and analytical studies confirmed excellent linearity and precision. In a cohort of 1048 samples collected at biopsy, the results correlated significantly with ELISA quantification and were integrated into a previously validated 8-parameter urine chemokine model. The next generation immunoassay achieved an accuracy of 0.84 for AR diagnosis. This study validates this technology as a robust, locally available and unexpensive platform and marks a significant step towards the widespread implementation of uCXCL9/10, for immune quiescence monitoring. Therefore, we developed an open-access web application using uCXCL9/10 to calculate AR risk and improve clinical decision-making to perform biopsy, ushering in a new era in kidney transplantation, where personalized, data-driven care becomes the norm.

Perspective for Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: Defining Context of Use and Clinical Implications

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major cause of graft failure limiting long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation. Current diagnostic strategy to detect AMR is suboptimal and requires further improvement. Previously suggested treatment regimens for AMR could not demonstrate efficacy, however novel therapeutic agents are currently under investigation. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a novel non-invasive biomarker for allograft injury, that has been mainly studied in the context of rejection. Its short-half-life in circulation and injury-dependent release are its key advantages that contribute to its superior diagnostic accuracy, compared to traditional biomarkers. Moreover, previous studies showed that dd-cfDNA-release is well-linked to histological and molecular features of AMR, and thus able to reflect real-time injury. Further observations suggest that dd-cfDNA can be used as a suitable screening tool for early detection of AMR in patients with donor-specific-anti-HLA-antibodies (DSA), as well as for monitoring AMR activity after anti-rejection treatment. The weight of evidence suggests that the integration of dd-cfDNA in the graft surveillance of patients with AMR, or those suspicious of AMR (e.g., due to the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA-antibodies) has an added value and might have a positive impact on outcomes in this specific cohort.

The Microscope and Beyond: Current Trends in the Characterization of Kidney Allograft Rejection From Tissue Samples

The Banff classification is regularly updated to integrate recent advances in the characterization of kidney allograft rejection, gathering novel diagnostic, prognostic, and theragnostic data into a diagnostic and pathogenesis-based framework. Despite ongoing research on noninvasive biomarkers of kidney rejection, the Banff classification remains, to date, biopsy-centered, primarily relying on a semiquantitative histological scoring system that overall lacks reproducibility and granularity. Besides, the ability of histopathological injuries and transcriptomics analyses from bulk tissue to accurately infer the pathogenesis of rejection is questioned. This review discusses findings from past, current, and emerging innovative tools that have the potential to enhance the characterization of allograft rejection from tissue samples. First, the digitalization of pathological workflows and the rise of deep learning should yield more reproducible and quantitative results from routine slides. Additionally, novel histomorphometric features of kidney rejection could be discovered with an overall genuine clinical implementation perspective. Second, multiplex immunohistochemistry enables in-depth in situ phenotyping of cells from formalin-fixed samples, which can decipher the heterogeneity of the immune infiltrate during kidney allograft rejection. Third, transcriptomics from bulk tissue is gradually integrated into the Banff classification, and its specific context of use is currently under extensive consideration. Finally, single-cell transcriptomics and spatial transcriptomics from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples are emerging techniques capable of producing up to genome-wide data with unprecedented precision levels. Combining all these approaches gives us hope for novel advances that will address the current blind spots of the Banff system.

Blood Gene Signature as a Biomarker for Subclinical Kidney Allograft Rejection: Where Are We?

The observation decades ago that inflammatory injuries because of an alloimmune response might be present even in the absence of concomitant clinical impairment in allograft function conduced to the later definition of subclinical rejection. Many studies have investigated the different subclinical rejections defined according to the Banff classification (subclinical T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection), overall concluding that these episodes worsened long-term allograft function and survival. These observations led several transplant teams to perform systematic protocolar biopsies to anticipate treatment of rejection episodes and possibly prevent allograft loss. Paradoxically, the invasive characteristics and associated logistics of such procedures paved the way to investigate noninvasive biomarkers (urine and blood) of subclinical rejection. Among them, several research teams proposed a blood gene signature developed from cohort studies, most of which achieved excellent predictive values for the occurrence of subclinical rejection, mainly antibody-mediated rejection. Interestingly, although all identified genes relate to immune subsets and pathways involved in rejection pathophysiology, very few transcripts are shared among these sets of genes, highlighting the heterogenicity of such episodes and the difficult but mandatory need for external validation of such tools. Beyond this, their application and value in clinical practice remain to be definitively demonstrated in both biopsy avoidance and prevention of clinical rejection episodes. Their combination with other biomarkers, either epidemiological or biological, could contribute to a more accurate picture of a patient's risk of rejection and guide clinicians in the follow-up of kidney transplant recipients.

Urine CXCL10 as a biomarker in kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Urine CXCL10 is a promising biomarker for posttransplant renal allograft monitoring but is currently not widely used for clinical management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Large retrospective studies and data from a prospective randomized trial as well as a prospective cohort study demonstrate that low urine CXCL10 levels are associated with a low risk of rejection and can exclude BK polyomavirus replication with high certainty. Urine CXCL10 can either be used as part of a multiparameter based risk assessment tool, or as an individual biomarker taking relevant confounders into account. A novel Luminex-based CXCL10 assay has been validated in a multicenter study, and proved to be robust, reproducible, and accurate.

SUMMARY

Urine CXCL10 is a well characterized inflammation biomarker, which can be used to guide performance of surveillance biopsies. Wide implementation into clinical practice depends on the availability of inexpensive, thoroughly validated assays with approval from regulatory authorities.

Toward Precision Medicine: Exploring the Landscape of Biomarkers in Acute Kidney Injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) remains a complex challenge with diverse underlying pathological mechanisms and etiologies. Current detection methods predominantly rely on serum creatinine, which exhibits substantial limitations in specificity and poses the issue of late-stage detection of kidney injury. In this review, we propose an up-to-date and comprehensive summary of advancements that identified novel biomarker candidates in blood and urine and ideal criteria for AKI biomarkers such as renal injury specificity, mechanistic insight, prognostic capacity, and affordability. Recently identified biomarkers not only indicate injury location but also offer valuable insights into a range of pathological processes, encompassing reduced glomerular filtration rate, tubular function, inflammation, and adaptive response to injury. The clinical applications of AKI biomarkers are becoming extensive and serving as relevant tools in distinguishing acute tubular necrosis from other acute renal conditions. Also, these biomarkers can offer significant insights into the risk of progression to chronic kidney disease CKD and in the context of kidney transplantation. Integration of these biomarkers into clinical practice has the potential to improve early diagnosis of AKI and revolutionize the design of clinical trials, offering valuable endpoints for therapeutic interventions and enhancing patient care and outcomes.

Embracing the Wisdom of Ancient Greece in the Era of Personalized Medicine-Uncertainty, Probabilistic Reasoning, and Democratic Consensus

Further improvements of outcome after solid organ transplantation will depend on our ability to integrate personalized medicine in clinical routine. Not only better risk stratification or improved diagnostics, also targeted therapies and predictive markers of treatment success are needed, as there is a virtual standstill in the development and implementation of novel therapies for prevention and treatment of allograft rejection. The integration of clinical decision support algorithms and novel biomarkers in clinical practice will require a different reasoning, embracing concepts of uncertainty and probabilistic thinking as the ground truth is often unknown and the tools imperfect. This is important for communication between healthcare professionals, but patients and their caregivers also need to be informed and educated about the levels of uncertainty inherent to personalized medicine. In the translation of research findings and personalized medicine to routine clinical care, it remains crucial to maintain global consensus on major aspects of clinical routine, to avoid further divergence between centres and countries in the standard of care. Such consensus can only be reached when experts with divergent opinions are willing to transcend their own convictions, understand that there is not one single truth, and thus are able to embrace a level of uncertainty.