American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Role of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Ultrasound transmural healing correlates with higher adalimumab drug concentration in Crohn's disease only in the short-term

BACKGROUND

Anti-TNF drugs have revolutionized the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and have set new therapeutic targets. A direct correlation between anti-TNF trough levels and endoscopic healing in IBD patients has been established, but the association between drug levels and transmural healing assessed by ultrasound is not yet clearly defined.

AIMS

To evaluate the correlation between the serum concentration of adalimumab (ADA) and sonographic transmural healing in CD patients at different times during the follow-up of patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective, cross-sectional study all patients with CD who were undergoing treatment with ADA in our center were included. Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) was performed before the initiation of the drug and for response monitoring. ADA serum-through levels were compared between patients with and without transmural healing at different periods of time.

RESULTS

92 patients were included, all patients showed signs of inflammatory activity in the baseline IUS. In the IUS monitoring of the response to ADA, 34 (34.8%) patients presented transmural healing. Among patients in the first year of treatment, those with sonographic healing showed higher median levels than patients without transmural healing (12.0 µg/mL vs. 9.3 µg/mL, respectively; p= 0.007). There was no correlation found between adalimumab levels and sonographic healing in patients undergoing treatment for over a year.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher adalimumab through levels were corelated with transmural healing with ultrasound during the first year of treatment. This correlation was not found after one year of treatment.

HLA-DQA1*05 correlates with increased risk of anti-drug antibody development and reduced response to infliximab in Chinese patients with Crohn's disease

Background

The efficacy of anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease (CD), such as infliximab, is often compromised by the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). The genetic variation HLA-DQA1*05 has been linked to the immunogenicity of biologics, influencing ADA formation. This study investigates the correlation between HLA-DQA1*05 and ADA formation in CD patients treated with infliximab in a Chinese Han population and assesses clinical outcomes.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, 345 infliximab-exposed CD patients were genotyped for HLADQ A1*05A > G (rs2097432). We evaluated the risk of ADA development, loss of infliximab response, adverse events, and treatment discontinuation among variant and wild-type allele individuals.

Results

A higher percentage of patients with ADAs formation was observed in HLA-DQA1*05 G variant carriers compared with HLA-DQA1*05 wild-type carriers (58.5% vs 42.9%, P = 0.004). HLA-DQA1*05 carriage significantly increased the risk of ADAs development (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.65, 95% CI 1.18-2.30, P = 0.003) and was associated with a greater likelihood of infliximab response loss (adjusted HR = 2.55, 95% CI 1.78-3.68, P < 0.0001) and treatment discontinuation (adjusted HR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.59-3.06, P < 0.0001). Interestingly, combined therapy with immunomodulators increased the risk of response loss in HLA-DQA1*05 variant carriers.

Conclusions

HLA-DQA1*05 significantly predicts ADAs formation and impacts treatment outcomes in infliximab-treated CD patients. Pre-treatment screening for this genetic factor could therefore be instrumental in personalizing anti-TNF therapy strategies for these patients.

A prediction method for the individual serum concentration and therapeutic effect for optimizing adalimumab therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

Adalimumab (ADM) therapy is effective for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but a significant number of IBD patients lose response to ADM. Thus, it is crucial to devise methods to enhance ADM's effectiveness. This study introduces a strategy to predict individual serum concentrations and therapeutic effects to optimize ADM therapy for IBD during the induction phase.

METHODS

We predicted the individual serum concentration and therapeutic effect of ADM during the induction phase based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters calculated using the empirical Bayesian method. We then examined whether the predicted therapeutic effect, defined as clinical remission or treatment failure, matched the observed effect.

RESULTS

Data were obtained from 11 IBD patients. The therapeutic effect during maintenance therapy was successfully predicted at 40 of 47 time points. Moreover, the predicted effects at each patient's final time point matched the observed effects in 9 of the 11 patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the inaugural report predicting the individual serum concentration and therapeutic effect of ADM using the Bayesian method and PK/PD modelling during the induction phase. This strategy may aid in optimizing ADM therapy for IBD.

Efficacy of optimised thiopurine therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: retrospective long-term follow-up from two randomised trials

OBJECTIVE

The long-term outcome of thiopurine therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) enrolled in prospective trials have not been evaluated. We aimed to assess the effects of optimised thiopurine maintenance therapy for UC.

METHODS

Long-term data were obtained from patients from our center enrolled in two randomised, prospective, open-label, controlled studies comprising 66 thiopurine-naïve moderate-to-severe patients with UC consisting of a low dose azathioprine (AZA)/allopurinol combination or AZA monotherapy. Following the randomised trials, treatment was adjusted according to adverse effects and metabolites. Patients requiring optimisation initially on AZA monotherapy treatment were switched to low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol, low dose 6-mercaptopurin in combination with allopurinol, or 6-mercaptopurin treatment alone, and those treated with low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol were switched to low dose 6-mercaptopurin in combination with allopurinol or 6-mercaptopurin alone.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients were included in the analysis; 31 were initially treated with AZA monotherapy and 31 with low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol. Initial treatment was tolerated by 67% patients (7 AZA monotherapy and 28 low dose AZA in combination with allopurinol), increasing to 94% (58 patients) post-adjustment. After a median 52-month follow-up period, 38 (93%) out of the 41 primary responding patients-maintained clinical remission without steroids, biologics or surgery. The four intolerant patients and the 17 not responding to optimisation were more likely to require colectomy (odds ratio 16.36; 95% confidence interval 3.08-87.03, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Optimised thiopurine therapy demonstrated effective long-term treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of vedolizumab therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring is effective for optimizing anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies in inflammatory bowel disease, but for vedolizumab, a gut-selective leucocyte migration inhibitor, data are scarce.

METHODS

Observational cohort study including 116 bio-experienced inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with vedolizumab for active luminal disease. Biobanked trough blood samples (n = 676) covering 96% of patients were analyzed using a drug-binding immunofluorometric assay. Steroid-free treatment outcomes were classified by clinical disease activity indices and objective findings, primarily endoscopy.

RESULTS

Patients with clinical remission to vedolizumab induction therapy (37%) had significantly higher trough levels than those without at weeks 6 (mean 34.1 vs 28.0 μg/mL, P = 0.03) and 10 (34.8 vs 27.5 μg/mL, P = 0.01). Optimal thresholds for discrimination were 32.4 μg/mL (AUCROC 0.66, P = 0.04) and 23.5 (AUCROC 0.67, P = 0.01), respectively. This positive association persisted during maintenance phase with 11.9 μg/mL (AUCROC 0.69, P < 0.01) associated with clinical remission (37%) and 15.3 (AUCROC 0.74, P < 0.001) for objective remission (46%). Stratification by temporal evolution of treatment effects revealed higher induction and maintenance vedolizumab levels in persistent and slow responders as compared to secondary or persistent failures. Pharmacokinetics was influenced by rare formation of anti-vedolizumab antibodies (2%), and to a lesser extent gender and albumin during induction, but not disease severity, concomitant steroids, or thiopurine metabolites. Switching to subcutaneous administrations resulted in 2.3-fold increase in steady-state trough levels.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports maintaining adequate drug exposure being essential for sustained positive outcomes of vedolizumab and emphasizes individualized, therapeutic drug monitoring-based treatment regimens. Controlled trials and pharmacokinetic modeling are, however, needed.

Mechanisms and management of loss of response to anti-TNF therapy for patients with Crohn's disease: 3-year data from the prospective, multicentre PANTS cohort study

BACKGROUND

We sought to report the effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab over the first 3 years of treatment and to define the factors that predict anti-TNF treatment failure and the strategies that prevent or mitigate loss of response.

METHODS

Personalised Anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease (PANTS) is a UK-wide, multicentre, prospective observational cohort study reporting the rates of effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab in anti-TNF-naive patients with active luminal Crohn's disease aged 6 years and older. At the end of the first year, sites were invited to enrol participants still receiving study drug into the 2-year PANTS-extension study. We estimated rates of remission across the whole cohort at the end of years 1, 2, and 3 of the study using a modified survival technique with permutation testing. Multivariable regression and survival analyses were used to identify factors associated with loss of response in patients who had initially responded to anti-TNF therapy and with immunogenicity. Loss of response was defined in patients who initially responded to anti-TNF therapy at the end of induction and who subsequently developed symptomatic activity that warranted an escalation of steroid, immunomodulatory, or anti-TNF therapy, resectional surgery, or exit from study due to treatment failure. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03088449, and is now complete.

FINDINGS

Between March 19, 2014, and Sept 21, 2017, 389 (41%) of 955 patients treated with infliximab and 209 (32%) of 655 treated with adalimumab in the PANTS study entered the PANTS-extension study (median age 32·5 years [IQR 22·1-46·8], 307 [51%] of 598 were female, and 291 [49%] were male). The estimated proportion of patients in remission at the end of years 1, 2, and 3 were, for infliximab 40·2% (95% CI 36·7-43·7), 34·4% (29·9-39·0), and 34·7% (29·8-39·5), and for adalimumab 35·9% (95% CI 31·2-40·5), 32·9% (26·8-39·2), and 28·9% (21·9-36·3), respectively. Optimal drug concentrations at week 14 to predict remission at any later timepoints were 6·1-10·0 mg/L for infliximab and 10·1-12·0 mg/L for adalimumab. After excluding patients who had primary non-response, the estimated proportions of patients who had loss of response by years 1, 2, and 3 were, for infliximab 34·4% (95% CI 30·4-38·2), 54·5% (49·4-59·0), and 60·0% (54·1-65·2), and for adalimumab 32·1% (26·7-37·1), 47·2% (40·2-53·4), and 68·4% (50·9-79·7), respectively. In multivariable analysis, loss of response at year 2 and 3 for patients treated with infliximab and adalimumab was predicted by low anti-TNF drug concentrations at week 14 (infliximab: hazard ratio [HR] for each ten-fold increase in drug concentration 0·45 [95% CI 0·30-0·67], adalimumab: 0·39 [0·22-0·70]). For patients treated with infliximab, loss of response was also associated with female sex (vs male sex; HR 1·47 [95% CI 1·11-1·95]), obesity (vs not obese 1·62 [1·08-2·42]), baseline white cell count (1·06 [1·02-1·11) per 1 × 109 increase in cells per L), and thiopurine dose quartile. Among patients treated with adalimumab, carriage of the HLA-DQA1*05 risk variant was associated with loss of response (HR 1·95 [95% CI 1·17-3·25]). By the end of year 3, the estimated proportion of patients who developed anti-drug antibodies associated with undetectable drug concentrations was 44·0% (95% CI 38·1-49·4) among patients treated with infliximab and 20·3% (13·8-26·2) among those treated with adalimumab. The development of anti-drug antibodies associated with undetectable drug concentrations was significantly associated with treatment without concomitant immunomodulator use for both groups (HR for immunomodulator use: infliximab 0·40 [95% CI 0·31-0·52], adalimumab 0·42 [95% CI 0·24-0·75]), and with carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 risk variant for infliximab (HR for carriage of risk variant: infliximab 1·46 [1·13-1·88]) but not for adalimumab (HR 1·60 [0·92-2·77]). Concomitant use of an immunomodulator before or on the day of starting infliximab was associated with increased time without the development of anti-drug antibodies associated with undetectable drug concentrations compared with use of infliximab alone (HR 2·87 [95% CI 2·20-3·74]) or introduction of an immunomodulator after anti-TNF initiation (1·70 [1·11-2·59]). In years 2 and 3, 16 (4%) of 389 patients treated with infliximab and 11 (5%) of 209 treated with adalimumab had adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal. Nine (2%) patients treated with infliximab and two (1%) of those treated with adalimumab had serious infections in years 2 and 3.

INTERPRETATION

Only around a third of patients with active luminal Crohn's disease treated with an anti-TNF drug were in remission at the end of 3 years of treatment. Low drug concentrations at the end of the induction period predict loss of response by year 3 of treatment, suggesting higher drug concentrations during the first year of treatment, particularly during induction, might lead to better long-term outcomes. Anti-drug antibodies associated with undetectable drug concentrations of infliximab, but not adalimumab, can be predicted by carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 and mitigated by concomitant immunomodulator use for both drugs.

FUNDING

Guts UK, Crohn's and Colitis UK, Cure Crohn's Colitis, AbbVie, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Napp Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Celltrion Healthcare.

Forecasted infliximab concentrations during induction predict time to remission and sustained disease control of inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Infliximab (IFX) exposure is established as a predictive factor of pharmacokinetic (PK) origin in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and expert consensus is to achieve adequate exposure during induction to achieve and sustain remission.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the performance of a Bayesian PK tool in IBD patients starting IFX. Trough IFX serum levels collected immediately before the third (at week 6) and fourth (at week 14) infusions were evaluated from 307 IBD patients (median age=17 years, 50 % females, 83 % with Crohn's disease). Forecasted IFX concentration at the fourth infusion were estimated using serum IFX, antibodies to IFX, albumin and weight determined immediately before the third infusion using population PK calculator with Bayesian prior. The outcome variable was a clinical & biochemical remission status achieved (CRP levels below 3 mg/L in presence of clinical remission). Statistics consisted of Kaplan Meier analysis with calculation of Hazard ratio (HR), and logistic regression.

RESULTS

IFX concentration above 15 µg/mL immediately before the third infusion associated with shorter time to clinical & biochemical remission than concentration below 15 µg/mL without reaching significance (163±14 days vs 200±16 days, respectively; p=0.052). However, using PK parameters at the third infusion, forecasted IFX concentrations above 10 µg/mL immediately before the fourth infusion were significantly associated with a higher rate (HR=1.6 95 %CI: 1.1 to 2.1 p<0.01) and shorter time to remission (148±18 days vs 200±13 days p<0.01). In the presence of IFX concentration above 15 µg/mL at the third infusion, there was a significant 2.5-fold higher likelihood of sustained clinical & biochemical remission status during maintenance as compared to IFX concentrations below 15 µg/mL (p<0.01). Forecasted IFX level above 10 µg/mL at fourth infusion associated with significantly 3.9-fold higher likelihood of clinical & biochemical remission as compared to forecasted IFX concentrations below 10 µg/mL (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These data further support that optimized IFX concentrations during induction are associated with enhanced disease control in IBD.

Higher Serum Infliximab Concentrations Following Subcutaneous Dosing are Associated with Deep Remission in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

The relationship between subcutaneous infliximab [SC-IFX] concentrations and favourable therapeutic outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC] remains elusive.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study included consecutive adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] treated with SC-IFX at a maintenance dose of 120 mg/2 weeks. Investigated therapeutic outcomes included sustained clinical remission; composite clinical and biomarker remission [clinical remission and C-reactive protein <5 mg/L]; biochemical remission [faecal calprotectin <250 µg/g]; and deep remission [clinical, biological, and biochemical remission].

RESULTS

Of 91 patients identified, 71 qualified for inclusion in the study [70% with CD; 27% with concomitant immunomodulators]. At the time of drug concentration measurement [median 13.5 months after switch], 55 [77%] patients had sustained clinical remission; n = 44 [62%] composite clinical and biomarker remission; n = 40 [56%] biochemical remission; and n = 31 [43%] deep remission. The mean SC-IFX concentrations were significantly higher in patients with sustained clinical remission [p = 0.014]; composite clinical and biomarker remission [p = 0.003]; biochemical remission [p < 0.001]; and deep remission [p < 0.001] compared to patients without having these outcomes. In multivariate analysis, SC-IFX concentration was the only factor independently associated with sustained clinical remission (odds ratio [OR]: 4.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1-12.2, p = 0.005); clinical and biomarker remission [OR: 9.21, 95% CI: 6.09-18.7, p = 0.006]; biochemical remission [OR: 37, 95% CI: 14-39.3, p < 0.001]; and deep remission [OR: 29, 95% CI: 15.7-37.4, p < 0.001]. The optimal SC-IFX concentration cut-off associated with deep remission based on ROC analysis was 20 µg/mL [sensitivity: 0.91, specificity: 0.80, accuracy: 0.85]. Combination with an immunomodulator failed to improve SC-IFX pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSION

Higher SC-IFX concentrations are associated with higher rates of favourable therapeutic outcomes in IBD patients. Serum SC-IFX concentrations >20 µg/mL were significantly associated with deep remission.

Risankizumab Concentration but not IL-22 Levels are Associated With Clinical and Biochemical Remission in Patients With Crohn's Disease

Risankizumab (RZB) is a monoclonal antibody that targets the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23.1 The ADVANCE and MOTIVATE randomized controlled trials (RCTs)2 demonstrated that intravenous (IV) RZB compared with placebo led to higher rates of clinical remission and endoscopic response at week 12 in patients with active Crohn's disease (CD).2 The phase III FORTIFY RCT showed that subcutaneous (SC) RZB was significantly more effective than placebo for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic response as maintenance therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active CD.3.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases. Position statement of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has undergone a significant transformation following the introduction of biologic drugs. Thanks to these drugs, treatment goals have evolved from clinical response and remission to more ambitious objectives, such as endoscopic or radiologic remission. However, even though biologics are highly effective, a significant percentage of patients will not achieve an initial response or may lose it over time. We know that there is a direct relationship between the trough concentrations of the biologic and its therapeutic efficacy, with more demanding therapeutic goals requiring higher drug levels, and inadequate exposure being common. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic medications, along with pharmacokinetic models, provides us with the possibility of offering a personalized approach to treatment for patients with IBD. Over the past few years, relevant information has accumulated regarding its utility during or after induction, as well as in the maintenance of biologic treatment, in reactive or proactive strategies, and prior to withdrawal or treatment de-escalation. The aim of this document is to establish recommendations regarding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, in different clinical practice scenarios, and to identify areas where its utility is evident, promising, or controversial.

De-escalation of Biologic Treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Review

INTRODUCTION

Biologic therapy is an effective treatment for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. However due to cost and safety concerns, dose de-escalation strategies after achieving remission have been suggested.

AIM

To critically review available data on dose de-escalation of biologics [or other advanced therapies] in IBD. We will focus on studies evaluating de-escalation to standard dosing in patients initially optimised, and also on studies assessing de-escalation from standard dosing.

METHODS

A systematic bibliographic search was performed.

RESULTS

The mean frequency of de-escalation after previous dose intensification [12 studies, 1,474 patients] was 34%. The corresponding frequency of de-escalation from standard dosing [five studies, 3,842 patients] was 4.2%. The relapse rate of IBD following anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] de-escalation to standard dosing in patients initially dose-escalated [10 studies, 301 patients] was 30%. The corresponding relapse rate following anti-TNF de-escalation from standard dosing [nine studies, 494 patients] was 38%. The risk of relapse was lower for patients in clinical, biologic, and endoscopic/radiological remission at the time of de-escalation. A role of anti-TNF therapeutic drug monitoring in the decision to dose de-escalate has been demonstrated. In patients relapsing after de-escalation, re-escalation is generally effective. De-escalation is not consistently associated with a better safety profile. The cost-effectiveness of the de-escalation strategy remains uncertain. Finally, there is not enough evidence to recommend dose de-escalation of biologics different from anti-TNFs or small molecules.

CONCLUSIONS

Any consideration for de-escalation of biologic therapy in IBD must be tailored, taking into account the risks and consequences of a flare and patients' preferences.

Observational Study to Compare Biological Drug Concentration Quantification Techniques and Immunogenicity in Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases

Measuring biological drugs' trough concentrations and the concentrations of anti-drug antibodies is a valuable practice for treatment optimization. ELISA techniques are the gold standard for biological drug concentration quantification, but new techniques such as chemiluminescence immunoassays present some advantages. The aim of this unicentric prospective observational study is to compare the infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab trough levels and anti-adalimumab and anti-infliximab antibodies concentrations obtained when using a chemiluminescent instrument (i-TRACK®, Theradiag, Croissy-Beaubourg, France) and an ELISA instrument (TRITURUS®, Griffols, Barcelona, Spain). Linear regression, Pearson or Spearman tests, Bland-Altman plots and the Cohen kappa test were applied for every sample. The correlation was excellent for both assays in the measurement of all drug concentrations. In general, values were lower when measured using i-TRACK than when using TRITURUS, especially when the values were high. Both techniques proved valuable in clinical practice for monitoring adalimumab and infliximab drug concentration. However, the results were modest for ustekinumab and vedolizumab, so caution is recommended and further research is needed. The limited number of anti-drug antibody-positive samples precluded a comparison between the techniques.

First Mexican Consensus on Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

Crohn's disease (CD) is a subtype of chronic and incurable inflammatory bowel disease. It can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract and its etiology is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this consensus was to establish the most relevant aspects related to definitions, diagnosis, follow-up, medical treatment, and surgical treatment of Crohn's disease in Mexico.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Mexican specialists in the areas of gastroenterology and inflammatory bowel disease were summoned. The consensus was divided into five modules, with 69 statements. Applying the Delphi panel method, the pre-meeting questions were sent to the participants, to be edited and weighted. At the face-to-face meeting, all the selected articles were shown, underlining their level of clinical evidence; all the statements were discussed, and a final vote was carried out, determining the percentage of agreement for each statement.

RESULTS

The first Mexican consensus on Crohn's disease was produced, in which recommendations for definitions, classifications, diagnostic aspects, follow-up, medical treatment, and surgical treatment were established.

CONCLUSIONS

Updated recommendations are provided that focus on definitions, classifications, diagnostic criteria, follow-up, and guidelines for conventional medical treatment, biologic therapy, and small molecule treatment, as well as surgical management.

Data mining and safety analysis of traditional immunosuppressive drugs: a pharmacovigilance investigation based on the FAERS database

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study aimed to explore the new and serious adverse events(AEs) of Tacrolimus(FK506), cyclosporine(CsA), azathioprine(AZA), mycophenolate mofetil(MMF), cyclophosphamide(CTX) and methotrexate(MTX), which have not been concerned.

METHODS

The FAERS data from January 2016 and December 2022 were selected for disproportionality analysis to discover the potential risks of traditional immunosuppressive drugs.

RESULTS

Compared with CsA, FK506 has more frequent transplant rejection, and is more related to renal impairment, COVID-19, cytomegalovirus infection and aspergillus infection. However, CsA has a high infection-related fatality rate. In addition, we also found some serious and rare AE in other drugs which were rarely reported in previous studies. For example, AZA is closely related to hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma with high fatality rate and MTX is strongly related to hypofibrinogenemia.

CONCLUSION

The AEs report on this study confirmed that the results were basically consistent with the previous studies, but there were also some important safety signals that were inconsistent with or not mentioned in previous published studies.

EXPERT OPINION

The opinion section discusses some of the limitations and shortcomings, proposing the areas where more effort should be invested in order to improve the safety of immunosuppressive drugs.

Early proactive monitoring of DNA-thioguanine in patients with Crohn's disease predicts thiopurine-induced late leucopenia in NUDT15/TPMT normal metabolizers

BACKGROUND

Thiopurine-induced leucopenia significantly hinders the wide application of thiopurines. Dose optimization guided by nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15) has significantly reduced the early leucopenia rate, but there are no definitive biomarkers for late risk leucopenia prediction.

AIM

To determine the predictive value of early monitoring of DNA-thioguanine (DNATG) or 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6TGN) for late leucopenia under a NUDT15-guided thiopurine dosing strategy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

Blood samples were collected within two months after thiopurine initiation for detection of metabolite concentrations. Late leucopenia was defined as a leukocyte count < 3.5 × 109/L over two months.

RESULTS

Of 148 patients studied, late leucopenia was observed in 15.6% (17/109) of NUDT15/thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) normal and 64.1% (25/39) of intermediate metabolizers. In patients suffering late leucopenia, early DNATG levels were significantly higher than in those who did not develop late leucopenia (P = 4.9 × 10-13). The DNATG threshold of 319.43 fmol/μg DNA could predict late leucopenia in the entire sample with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.855 (sensitivity 83%, specificity 81%), and in NUDT15/TPMT normal metabolizers, the predictive performance of a threshold of 315.72 fmol/μg DNA was much more remarkable with an AUC of 0.902 (sensitivity 88%, specificity 85%). 6TGN had a relatively poor correlation with late leucopenia whether in the entire sample (P = 0.021) or NUDT15/TPMT normal or intermediate metabolizers (P = 0.018, P = 0.55, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of DNATG could be an effective strategy to prevent late leucopenia in both NUDT15/TPMT normal and intermediate metabolizers with CD, especially the former.

Efficacy and safety of proactive drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease treated with anti-TNF agents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature was conducted to assess efficacy and safety of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) versus conventional management during maintenance treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNFα) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

A search was conducted up to January 2022 (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library). The primary outcome was the ability to maintain clinical remission at 12 months. The certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Nine studies were identified: one systematic review, six randomised clinical trials, and two cohort studies. No superior efficacy of proactive TDM [relative risk 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-1.37, n=528; I2=55%] was shown. Proactive TDM could improve the durability of anti-TNFα treatment [odds ratio (OR) 0.12; 95%CI: 0.05-0.27; n=390; I2=45%), prevent acute infusion reactions (OR 0.21; 95%CI: 0.05-0.82; n=390; I2=0%), decrease adverse events (OR 0.38; 95%CI: 0.15-0.98; n=390; I2=14%), and reduce the probability of surgery, at lower economical expenditure.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysed evidence did not confirm the superiority of proactive TDM of anti-TNFα treatment over conventional management in patients with IBD, so proactive TDM should not currently be recommended.

Is tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal therapy with proactive therapeutic drug monitoring optimized for inflammatory bowel disease? Network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody therapy [adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX)] with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which has been proposed for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, are still controversial.

AIM

To determine the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody therapy with proactive TDM in patients with IBD and to determine which subtype of IBD patients is most suitable for proactive TDM interventions.

METHODS

As of July 2023, we searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to compare anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody therapy with proactive TDM with therapy with reactive TDM or empiric therapy. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were used to determine the IBD patient subtype that achieved clinical remission and to determine the need for surgery.

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis yielded 13 studies after exclusion, and the baseline indicators were balanced. We found a significant increase in the number of patients who achieved clinical remission in the ADA [odds ratio (OR) = 1.416, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.196-1.676] and RCT (OR = 1.393, 95%CI: 1.182-1.641) subgroups and a significant decrease in the number of patients who needed surgery in the proactive vs reactive (OR = 0.237, 95%CI: 0.101-0.558) and IFX + ADA (OR = 0.137, 95%CI: 0.032-0.588) subgroups, and the overall risk of adverse events was reduced (OR = 0.579, 95%CI: 0.391-0.858) according to the pairwise meta-analysis. Moreover, the network meta-analysis results suggested that patients with IBD treated with ADA (OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.19-1.63) were more likely to undergo TDM, especially in comparison with patients with reactive TDM (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.07-1.77).

CONCLUSION

Proactive TDM is more suitable for IBD patients treated with ADA and has obvious advantages over reactive TDM. We recommend proactive TDM in IBD patients who are treated with ADA.

Adalimumab Clearance, Rather Than Trough Level, May Have Greatest Relevance to Crohn's Disease Therapeutic Outcomes Assessed Clinically and Endoscopically

OBJECTIVE

We postulated that adalimumab [ADA] drug clearance [CL] may be a more critical determinant of therapeutic outcome than ADA concentration. This was tested in Crohn's disease [CD] patients undergoing ADA maintenance treatment.

METHODS

CD patients from four cohorts received ADA induction and started maintenance therapy. Therapeutic outcomes consisted of endoscopic remission [ER], sustained C-reactive protein [CRP] based clinical remission [defined as CRP levels below 3 mg/L in the absence of symptoms], and faecal calprotectin [FC] level below 100 µg/g. Serum albumin, ADA concentration, and anti-drug antibody status were determined using immunochemistry and homogeneous mobility shift assay, respectively. CL was determined using a nonlinear mixed effect model with Bayesian priors. Statistical analysis consisted of Mann-Whitney test and logistic regression with calculation of odds ratio. Repeated event analysis was conducted using a nonlinear mixed effect model.

RESULTS

In 237 enrolled patients [median age 40 years, 45% females], median CL was lower in patients achieving ER as compared with those with persistent active endoscopic disease [median 0.247 L/day vs 0.326 L/day, respectively] [p <0.01]. There was no significant difference in ADA concentration between patients in endoscopic remission compared with those with recurrence [median 9.3 µg/mL vs 11.7 µg/mL, respectively]. Sustained CRP-based clinical remission and FC levels below 100 µg/g were generally associated with lower CL and higher ADA concentration. Repeated event analysis confirmed those findings with better performances of CL than concentration in associating with ER and other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Lower ADA clearance is associated with an improved clinical outcome for patients with Crohn's disease and may be a superior pharmacokinetic measure than concentration.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: A practical approach

The global burden of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is estimated at 4.9 million and the global prevalence exceeds 0.3%. Multiple newer therapeutic agents have broadened the options for the therapy of IBD in the last three decades. Thiopurines, however, have retained their place as maintenance therapy in IBD, especially in resource-constrained setting. But thiopurines have narrow therapeutic range, often needing discontinuation due to side effects or lack of efficacy. Biologic agents revolutionized the treatment of IBD, but the efficacy is lost in 50% of patient after one year. These outcomes are often due to inadequate drug concentrations that may lead to the development of antibodies as well as pharmacodynamic failure. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was proposed to reduce loss of response and to optimize the therapy in patients on thiopurine and biologic therapy. TDM is based on exposure-response relationship, suggesting a positive correlation between elevated serum anti-TNF concentrations and favorable therapeutic outcomes. TDM has multiple facets. This article discusses the benefits, evidence and limitations of TDM. The practical use of TDM in clinical practice is highlighted. Newer developments in the field and their relevance in practice are discussed.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Utility and Gaps

Despite advances in the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), outcomes have remained suboptimal. Persistent disease activity, patient comorbidities and drug toxicities contribute to the accrual of progressive irreversible damage and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Currently, similar drug doses and regimens are promulgated in the treatment guidelines for all SLE patients, despite the vast differences in patient and environmental factors that affect the drugs' metabolism and blood concentrations. This causes a disconnect between drug dosing and drug blood concentrations, which can then result in unpredictability in drug toxicities and therapeutic effects. In this review, we discuss commonly used oral immunosuppressive medications in SLE, their pharmacogenomics, and factors affecting their metabolism and blood concentrations. Further, we highlight the role of therapeutic drug monitoring in SLE, which is the first accessible step to individualising therapy.

Enhancing Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comparative Analysis of Rapid Point-of-Care Infliximab, Adalimumab and Anti-Drug Antibodies' Determination against ELISA

The introduction of point-of-care (POC) assays into clinical practice in patients with inflammatory disease enables on-demand therapeutic decision making. The aim of this study was to compare the POC test Quantum blue (Bühlmann Laboratories) for infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADL), and its anti-drug antibodies with the traditional ELISA assay (Promonitor). A total of 200 serum samples were analyzed. Samples were classified into the following three different groups; sub-therapeutic range (IFX < 3 μg/mL and ADL < 5 μg/mL); therapeutic range (IFX: 3-7 μg/mL and ADL: 5-12 μg/mL) and supra-therapeutic range (IFX levels > 7 μg/mL and ADL levels > 12 μg/mL). Significant higher values were measured using the POC test (p < 0.001) for IFX results but no differences in ADL trough levels were observed (p = 0.3101). Spearman's correlation indicated a good correlation between the two assays (rs = 0.88 for ADL and rs = 0.93 for IFX), and McNemar's test revealed significant differences (p = 0.016) when classifying IFX samples between therapeutic and supra-therapeutic ranges but no significant differences were found among the other ranges for either IFX or ADL. These results show that we should be cautious when using these rapid measurement methods, and new targets should probably be defined for IFX when using this new analytical method.

Development and validation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the measurement of infliximab and anti-drug antibody levels

Infliximab and its anti-drug antibody (ADA) serum concentrations exhibit a strong correlation with clinical response and loss of response. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to measure the concentration of infliximab and ADA can facilitate clinical decision-making, helping patients attain optimal therapeutic effects. However, there are still limitations to the existing infliximab and its ADA detection methods. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based methods for measuring infliximab and its ADA levels in human plasma according to the general recommendations for immunoassays. Free infliximab is bound by recombinant TNF-α and detected using HRP-labeled anti-human antibody. The ADA is captured by on-plate-coated infliximab and recognized by biotin-labeled infliximab. Two bridging ELISA assays were developed and after assay optimization and validation, these assays have been applied in ten patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In infliximab detection assay, a standard curve ranging from 0.10 μg/mL to 8.0 μg/mL with great precision and accuracy has been established. Drug tolerance of the ADA assay was that 100 ng/mL ADA could tolerate at least 5.0 μg/mL infliximab in the plasma using a commercially available monoclonal anti-infliximab antibody as the positive control. The ADA screening and confirmatory assays achieved a sensitivity of 36.74 ng/mL and 37.15 ng/mL, respectively. All other assay characteristics met the requirements. The mean concentration of infliximab in eight patients with IBD was 7.88 (1.87-21.1) μg/mL, and the ADA levels were all negative. Moreover, the concentrations of infliximab in the remaining two patients were below the LLOQ and the ADAs were positive. Thus, accurate and sensitive ELISA methods have been developed and validated for the detection of infliximab and its ADA concentrations and have been successfully applied to clinical therapeutic drug monitoring.

Dose Escalation of Biologics in Biologic-Naïve Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Outcomes From the ODESSA-UC Study

Background

Dose escalation of biologics may regain treatment response in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, dose escalation rates and associated outcomes and costs are not well characterized in biologic-naïve patients receiving antitumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) treatments, such as infliximab or adalimumab or vedolizumab.

Methods

ODESSA-UC, a retrospective cohort study investigating dose escalation in patients with UC who had received first-line biologics, used data from IBM MarketScan databases. Adults with UC and ≥1 claim for an index drug (adalimumab, infliximab, or vedolizumab) were eligible. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the adjusted rate of dose escalation. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the odds of experiencing adverse outcomes (corticosteroid use, infection, sepsis, or inflammatory bowel disease-related hospitalization) and incurring index drug costs.

Results

A year after the start of maintenance, a lower proportion of patients experienced dose escalation with vedolizumab (22.3%) than adalimumab (43.0%). The dose escalation risk was significantly higher for infliximab (hazard ratio [HR], 1.894; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.486-2.413) and adalimumab (HR, 2.120; 95% CI, 1.680-2.675) than for vedolizumab. The odds of experiencing an adverse outcome after dose escalation were higher for anti-TNF-α treatments than for vedolizumab (odds ratio, 2.052; 95% CI, 1.200-3.507). Index drug costs after dose escalation were lowest for vedolizumab.

Conclusions

Patients with UC receiving vedolizumab had a lower risk of dose escalation and lower subsequent costs than patients receiving anti-TNF-α treatments. Our study demonstrates the possible clinical and economic implications of dose escalation.

The Combination of Predictive Factors of Pharmacokinetic Origin Associates with Enhanced Disease Control during Treatment of Pediatric Crohn's Disease with Infliximab

Infliximab (IFX) concentrations are a predictive factor (PF) of pharmacokinetic (PK) origin in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). We evaluated Clearance, another PF of PK origin, either alone or in combination with concentrations. They were evaluated from two cohorts, the first designed to receive standard dosing (n = 37), and the second designed to proactively target therapeutic IFX concentrations (n = 108). Concentrations were measured using homogeneous mobility shift assay. Clearance was estimated using the nonlinear mixed effects methods with Bayesian priors. C-reactive protein-based clinical remission (<3 mg/L in the absence of symptoms) was used for the disease control outcome measure. Longitudinal changes in disease control due to factors including time, IFX concentration, and Clearance were analyzed using repeated event analysis. Change in objective function value (∆OFV) was calculated to compare concentration and Clearance. The results indicated that lower baseline Clearance and proactive dosing associated with enhanced disease control during induction (p < 0.01). Higher IFX concentrations and lower Clearance measured at the second, third, and fourth infusion yielded improved disease control during maintenance (p < 0.032). During maintenance, the association with disease control was better with Clearance than with concentrations (∆OFV = -19.2; p < 0.001), and the combination of both further minimized OFV (p < 0.001) with markedly improved clinical yield in the presence of both PF of PK origin. We conclude that the combination of IFX concentration and Clearance are better predictors of therapeutic outcome compared with either one alone.

Ustekinumab trough levels in children with Crohn's disease refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents: a prospective case series of off-label use

Background: Ustekinumab is used off-label in pediatric Crohn's disease refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor. Data on optimal dosing, target trough levels, and potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring in children treated with ustekinumab are limited. Materials and Methods: We describe a series of six adolescents who consented to be treated with ustekinumab. We measured their trough levels, C-reactive protein, and fecal calprotectin before every administration. Results: Standard adult dosing was effective to achieve biochemical remission (fecal calprotectin < 250 mg/kg) in one patient and clinical remission (resolution of symptoms) in another. The other four patients failed to respond on standard dosing and underwent intravenous re-induction and interval shortening to increase ustekinumab trough levels. This resulted in biochemical remission in one patient and clinical remission in another, suggesting an exposure-response relationship. The remaining two patients had no therapeutic benefit, and ustekinumab was discontinued. Conclusion: In this report, we show that ustekinumab can induce remission in pediatric patients with anti-tumor necrosis factor refractory Crohn's disease. It is worth escalating the dose before abandoning the drug as ineffective. Prospective studies in children are needed to determine long-term efficacy of ustekinumab, usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring strategies, and, if applicable, optimal target trough levels.

Persistence Among Patients with Crohn Disease Previously Treated with an Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor and Switching or Cycling to Another Biologic Agent

PURPOSE

Nonresponse to an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent in patients with Crohn disease (CD) is often managed by either a switch to a different class of biologic (ie, ustekinumab, vedolizumab) or by cycling to another anti-TNF agent (ie, adalimumab, infliximab, certolizumab pegol). Persistence after a switch to a different biologic class or after cycling within the anti-TNF class was assessed in patients with nonresponse to an anti-TNF agent.

METHODS

Adults with CD who discontinued from an anti-TNF agent and either switched to a different class of biologic (ie, anti-interleukin/integrin; the switching cohort) or cycled within the anti-TNF class (the cycling cohort) between September 23, 2016, and August 1, 2019, were selected from a commercial database. The index date was defined as the date of the first claim of the subsequent-line biologic (index biologic) after an anti-TNF. The switching and cycling cohorts were balanced with regard to baseline characteristics, using inverse probability of treatment weights-average treatment effect (IPTW-ATE). Persistence with the index biologic was defined as consistent use with no gaps of >120 days (ustekinumab, vedolizumab, infliximab) or of >60 days (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol) in biologic supply. Composite end points were persistence while being corticosteroid-free (defined as no use of corticosteroids with ≥14 days of supply after day 90 post-index) and persistence while on monotherapy (no immunomodulators/nonindex biologics). Weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to assess outcomes at 12 months post-index.

FINDINGS

There were 444 patients in the weighted switching cohort (mean age, 40.4 years; 56.3% female) and 441 in the weighted cycling cohort (mean age, 39.5 years; 58.4% female). At 12 months post-index, the rate of persistence with the index biologic was 75.7% in the switching cohort compared to 67.5% in the cycling cohort (log-rank P = 0.023); the rate of persistence while on monotherapy was 58.2% compared to 44.2%, respectively (log-rank P < 0.001). The rate of persistence was 44% greater in the switching compared to that in the cycling cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11-1.88; P = 0.007); the rate of persistence while on monotherapy was 56% greater in the switching cohort (HR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.28-1.90; P < 0.001). The between-cohort difference in persistence while being corticosteroid-free was not statistically significant (HR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.89-1.32; P = 0.426).

IMPLICATIONS

Patients with CD who switched to a different biologic class were more persistent than were patients who cycled to another anti-TNF agent. These findings may be useful for physicians when considering the treatment of patients who have experienced nonresponse or loss of response to the first-line anti-TNF agent.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease-Asian perspectives: the results of a multinational web-based survey in the 8th Asian Organization for Crohn's and Colitis meeting

BACKGROUND/AIMS

As the characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) differ between Asians and Westerners, it is necessary to determine adequate therapeutic strategy for Asian IBD patients. We evaluated the current treatment of IBD in Asian countries/regions using a web-based survey.

METHODS

The Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases conducted a multinational web-based survey for current IBD care in Asia between September 16, 2020, and November 13, 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 384 doctors treating IBD patients from 24 Asian countries/regions responded to the survey. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, anti-integrins, and anti-interleukin-12/23 agents were available for use by 93.8%, 72.1%, and 70.1% of respondents in Asian countries/regions. Compared with a previous survey performed in 2014, an increased tendency for treatment with biologics, including anti-TNF agents, was observed. In the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis, 72.1% of respondents chose anti-TNF agents, followed by tacrolimus (11.7%). In the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory Crohn's disease, 90.4% chose anti-TNF agents, followed by thiopurines (53.1%), anti-interleukin-12/23 agents (39.3%), and anti-integrin agents (35.7%). In the treatment of Crohn's disease patients refractory to anti-TNF agents, the most preferred strategy was to measure serum levels of anti-TNF and anti-drug antibodies (40.9%), followed by empiric dose escalation or shortening of dosing intervals (25.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were some differences, treatment strategies for patients with IBD were mostly similar among Asian doctors. Based on the therapeutic outcomes, it is necessary to identify the most appropriate therapeutic strategy for Asian IBD patients.

Development of Antibodies to Ustekinumab Is Associated with Loss of Response in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Monitoring of anti-drug antibodies in patients on ustekinumab is not routinely recommended in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) due to low rates of immunogenicity.

AIM OF STUDY

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between anti-drug antibodies detected by a drug-tolerant assay and loss of response (LOR) to therapy in a cohort of patients with IBD being treated with ustekinumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study consecutively enrolled all adult patients with moderate to severe active IBD who had at least 2 years of follow-up after ustekinumab was initiated. LOR was defined as CDAI > 220 or HBI > 4 for Crohn's disease (CD) and partial Mayo subscore > 3 for ulcerative colitis (UC) and with a modification in disease management.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included (78 CD and 12 UC; mean age 37 years). Median levels of anti-ustekinumab antibodies (ATU) were significantly higher in patients with LOR compared to those with ongoing clinical response (15.2 µg/mL-eq CI (7.9-21.5) and 4.7 µg/mL-eq CI (2.1-10.5), respectively; p = 0.04). The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for ATU in predicting LOR was 0.76. The optimal cut-off point for identifying patients with LOR was 9.5 µg/mL-eq with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 85%. Uni- and multivariate analyses showed that serum ATU ≥ 9.5 µg/mL-eq (hazard ratio (HR) 2.54, 95%CI (1.80-5.93)), p = 0.022, prior vedolizumab (HR 2.78, 95%CI (1.09-3.34), p = 0.019) and prior azathioprine (HR 0.54, 95%CI (0.20-0.76), p = 0.014) exposures were the only factors independently associated with LOR to UST.

CONCLUSION

In our real-life cohort, ATU was identified as an independent predictor of LOR to ustekinumab in patients with IBD.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in circulating leukocytes in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

The treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) is one of the main challenges of modern medicine. Although a number of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are available, there is wide variability in clinical response to treatment among individuals. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been proposed to optimize treatment; however, some patients still experience unsatisfactory outcomes, although the blood concentrations of drugs in these patients remain in the therapeutic range. One possible reason for this is that the conventional samples (e.g., whole blood or plasma) used in TDM may not accurately reflect drug concentrations or concentrations of their metabolites at the target site. Hence, more refined TDM approaches to guide clinical decisions related to dose optimization are necessary. Circulating leukocytes or white blood cells have a critical role in driving the inflammatory process. They are recruited to the site of injury, infection and inflammation, and the main target of small molecule DMARDs is within immune cells. Given this, assaying drug concentrations in leukocytes has been proposed to be of possible relevance to the interpretation of outcomes. This review focuses on the clinical implications and challenges of drug monitoring of DMARDs in peripheral blood leukocytes from therapeutic or toxicological perspectives in IMIDs.

Optimizing Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Pregnant Women: A Critical Literature Review

BACKGROUND

More than 90% of pregnant women take at least one drug during pregnancy. Drug dose adjustments during pregnancy are sometimes necessary due to various pregnancy-induced physiological alterations frequently associated with lower plasma concentrations. However, the clinical relevance or benefits of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in pregnant women have not been specifically studied. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies in pregnant women are incredibly challenging for many reasons. Despite this, regulatory agencies have made efforts to encourage the inclusion of this population in clinical trials to achieve more information on the pharmacotherapy of pregnant women. This review aims to provide support for TDM recommendations and dose adjustments in pregnant women.

METHODS

The search was conducted after a predetermined strategy on PubMed and Scopus databases using the MeSH term "pregnancy" alongside other terms such as "Pregnancy and dose adjustment," "Pregnancy and therapeutic drug monitoring," "Pregnancy and PBPK," "Pregnancy and pharmacokinetics," and "Pregnancy and physiological changes."

RESULTS

The main information on TDM in pregnant women is available for antiepileptics, antipsychotics, antidepressants, antibiotics, antimalarials, and oncologic and immunosuppressive drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

More data are needed to support informed benefit-risk decision making for the administration of drugs to pregnant women. TDM and/or pharmacokinetic studies could ensure that pregnant women receive an adequate dosage of an active drug. Mechanistic modeling approaches potentially could increase our knowledge about the pharmacotherapy of this special population, and they could be used to better design dosage regimens.

Ustekinumab Trough Concentrations Are Associated with Biochemical Outcomes in Patients with Crohn's Disease

OBJECTIVE

It is unknown whether ustekinumab (UST) levels can predict clinical outcomes in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. We assessed the exposure-response relationship of UST trough concentrations with biochemical outcomes at week 24 in a prospective, real-world setting.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study in patients with CD starting UST in four academic centres in the Netherlands. All patients received a weight-adjusted intravenous (IV) UST induction dose, followed by one subcutaneous (SC) dose of 90 mg UST at 8 weeks. Maintenance therapy consisted of 90 mg subcutaneous UST every 8 or 12 weeks. Individual UST concentration time course during treatment were estimated using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model. Quartile analysis and logistic regression were performed to analyse if UST concentrations at week 8 were associated with biochemical remission rates at week 24 (C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤ 5 mg/L and / or faecal calprotectin (FC) ≤ 250 mg/kg).

RESULTS

In total, 124 patients with CD were included. Patients achieving biochemical remission at week 12 and 24 had significantly higher UST levels at week 8 compared to patients without biochemical remission (6.6 µg/mL versus 3.9 µg/mL, P < 0.01 and 6.3 µg/mL versus 3.9 µg/mL, P < 0.01, respectively). In quartile analysis, patients with UST levels in the highest quartile (≥ 6.3 µg/mL at week 8) had higher biochemical remission rates at week 12 and week 24. There was no association between UST levels at and corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world cohort of patients with CD, UST levels in the highest quartile (≥ 6.3 µg/mL) at week 8 were associated with higher biochemical remission rates at week 24.

Comparison of Performances of Adalimumab Biosimilars SB5, ABP501, GP2017, and MSB11022 in Treating Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Real-Life, Multicenter, Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab (ADA) biosimilars have entered the therapeutic armamentarium of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), allowing for the treatment of a greater number of patients for their reduced cost than the originator. However, comparative data on the efficacy and safety of the various ADA biosimilars remains scarce.We compare the efficacy and safety of ADA biosimilars SB5, ABP501, GP2017, and MSB11022 in treating IBD outpatients in a real-life Italian setting.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive IBD outpatients with complete clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic data. Clinical activity was measured using the Mayo score in ulcerative colitis (UC) and the Harvey-Bradshaw Index in Crohn's disease (CD). The primary endpoints were the following: (1) induction of remission in patients new to biologics and patients new to ADA but previously exposed to other anti-tumor necrosis factor agents or other biologics; (2) maintenance of remission in patients switched from the ADA originator to an ADA biosimilar; and (3) safety of various biosimilars.

RESULTS

A total of 533 patients were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria: 162 patients with UC and 371 patients with CD. Clinical remission was obtained in 79.6% of patients new to biologics and 59.2% of patients new to ADA but not to other biologics; clinical remission was maintained in 81.0% of patients switched from the originator, and adverse events were recorded in 6.7% of patients. There was no significant difference between the 4 ADA biosimilars for each predetermined endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab biosimilars are effective and safe in IBD treatment, both in new patients and in patients switched from the ADA originator. No difference in efficacy and safety was found between ADA biosimilars.

Treatment With Adalimumab 80 mg Every Other Week in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results of Treatment Intensification in Clinical Practice

Background

Loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is frequent and, in case of low drug levels, treatment intensification is recommended. In addition, in cases in which clinical response without attainment of remission (clinical, endoscopic, or radiological), intensification could be justified since higher drug levels are associated with better outcomes. For adalimumab (ADA), the standard intensification regimen is 40 mg every week (ew). Availability of ADA 80 mg prefilled pens has enabled every other week (eow) intensification. We assessed the clinical efficacy of intensification with ADA 80 mg eow.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Spain. Patients with IBD receiving maintenance ADA 80 mg eow with clinical, biomarker, and drug-level assessments were included. Demographics and clinical, biological, and endoscopic evaluation of the disease before and after ADA intensification, and pharmacokinetic assessments, were collected.

Results

Eighty-seven patients (72 Crohn's disease, 15 ulcerative colitis; average age 50 years) were included. Reasons for ADA intensification were: low ADA levels-<5 µg mL^-1-(17%), low ADA levels-<5 µg mL^-1-without clinical response (63%), clinical response without clinical remission (15%) and active disease on objective evaluation (including colonoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, capsule endoscopy, and/or intestinal ultrasound; 5%). Following treatment intensification to ADA 80 mg eow, 75 patients (86%) were in clinical remission and 69 (79.3%) were in biologic remission (clinical remission and normalization of biomarkers). After a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range 13-25), 63 patients (72%) remained on treatment and in clinical remission. There were no serious infections, hospitalizations, or deaths. Drug costs did not increase with the 80 mg eow regimen versus a standard intensification regimen.

Conclusions

ADA intensification to 80 mg eow was safe, effective, and did not increase drug costs versus standard intensification to 40 mg ew in our experience.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: implementation, utilization, and barriers in clinical practice in Scandinavia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may optimize biologic and thiopurine therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study aimed to investigate implementation and utilization of TDM in Scandinavia.

METHODS

A web-based questionnaire on the use of TDM was distributed to Scandinavian gastroenterologists via the national societies.

RESULTS

In total, 297 IBD physicians prescribing biologic therapies, equally distributed between community and university hospitals, were included (response rate 42%) (Norway 118 (40%), Denmark 86 (29%), Sweden 50 (17%), Finland 33 (11%), Iceland 10 (3%)). Overall, TDM was applied during biologic therapies by 87%, and for TNF-inhibitors >90%. Among the users, reactive and proactive TDM were utilized by 90% and 63%, respectively. Danish physicians were significantly less inclined to use TDM compared to other Scandinavian countries; (58% vs 98%); OR 0.03 [0.01-0.09], p < 0.001). Reactive TDM was commonly applied at primary (74%) and secondary (99%) treatment failure. Proactive TDM was used by 80% during maintenance therapy and 56% during induction and more commonly utilized in Norway (p < 0.001), and by physicians managing >10 IBD patients/week (p = 0.005). TDM scenarios were interpreted in accord with available evidence but with discrepancies for proactive TDM. The main barriers to TDM were lack of guidelines (51%) and time lag between sampling and results (49%). TDM of thiopurines was routinely used by 87%.

CONCLUSION

TDM of biologic and thiopurine therapies has been broadly implemented into clinical practice in Scandinavia. However, physicians call for TDM guidelines detailing indications and interpretations of test results along with improved test response times.

Precision medicine and drug optimization in adult inflammatory bowel disease patients

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) encompass two main entities including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Although having a common global pathophysiological mechanism, IBD patients are characterized by a significant interindividual heterogeneity and may differ by their disease type, disease locations, disease behaviours, disease manifestations, disease course as well as treatment needs. Indeed, although the therapeutic armamentarium for these diseases has expanded rapidly in recent years, a proportion of patients remains with a suboptimal response to medical treatment due to primary non-response, secondary loss of response or intolerance to currently available drugs. Identifying, prior to treatment initiation, which patients are likely to respond to a specific drug would improve the disease management, avoid unnecessary side effects and reduce the healthcare expenses. Precision medicine classifies individuals into subpopulations according to clinical and molecular characteristics with the objective to tailor preventative and therapeutic interventions to the characteristics of each patient. Interventions would thus be performed only on those who will benefit, sparing side effects and expense for those who will not. This review aims to summarize clinical factors, biomarkers (genetic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolic, radiomic or from the microbiota) and tools that could predict disease progression to guide towards a step-up or top-down strategy. Predictive factors of response or non-response to treatment will then be reviewed, followed by a discussion about the optimal dose of drug required for patients. The time at which these treatments should be administered (or rather can be stopped in case of a deep remission or in the aftermath of a surgery) will also be addressed. IBD remain biologically complex, with multifactorial etiopathology, clinical heterogeneity as well as temporal and therapeutic variabilities, which makes precision medicine especially challenging in this area. Although applied for many years in oncology, it remains an unmet medical need in IBD.

Pharmacokinetic and clinical monitoring through posologic changes in adalimumab intensification regimen from 40 mg every week to 80 mg every other week

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab dose escalation is often recommended for inflammatory bowel disease patients in cases of loss of response. The usual adalimumab intensification regimen was 40 mg every week. Recently the pharmaceutical companies commercialized the 80mg injection pen. In the biosimilars era, this pen was sold at the same price as the 40mg pen. Due to this and for patient comfort, we proposed that our stable intensified adalimumab patients on a 40mg every-week regimen, change to a dose of 80mg every-other-week.

AIM AND METHODS

an observational study was performed to monitor outcome through this posologic change. Clinical, analytic parameters and adalimumab trough levels were prospectively obtained at baseline, 4 and 12 months after posologic change. The evolution of this cohort and calculates savings were described.

RESULTS

13 patients were included in the study and the median time of adalimumab intensification prior to posologic change to 80mg eow was 32 months (IQR 29-63). At 4 months, all patients maintained adalimumab 80mg every-other-week. After month 4, two patients returned to the previous regimen after mild worsening, without significant changes in CRP, calprotectin or adalimumab-trough-levels. At 1 year, adalimumab was stopped in one patient in remission with undetectable levels and positive adalimumab-antibodies. No significant differences in adalimumab-trough-levels were noted before and after the posologic change. Costs fell from 16276 €/patient/year of treatment to 8812.15 €/patient/year of treatment.

CONCLUSION

In IBD patients with stable response to adalimumab intensification regimen of 40 mg every-week, changing to 80mg every-other-week seems to maintain response and similar adalimumab-trough-levels. Furthermore, it is cost-saving, although some patients may perceive mild symptoms.

Efficacy of ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or a second anti-TNF agent after the failure of a first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease: a multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

No study has performed a face-to-face comparison of biologics after the failure of the first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of biologics in this setting.

METHODS

Patients with CD who were refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, and treated with ustekinumab (UST), vedolizumab (VDZ), or a second anti-TNF drug as a second-line biological agent at 10 French tertiary centres from 2013 to 2019 were retrospectively included in this study.

RESULTS

Among the 203 patients included, 90 (44%) received UST, 42 (21%) received VDZ and 71 (35%) received a second anti-TNF agent. The first anti-TNF agent was discontinued due to a primary nonresponse in 42 (21%) patients. At weeks 14-24, the rates of steroid-free remission were similar between the UST, VDZ and second anti-TNF groups (29%, 38% and 44%, respectively, p = 0.15). With a mean follow-up of 118 weeks, drug survival was shorter for patients who received ustekinumab treatment (p = 0.001). In the case of trough level less than 5 µg/ml, patients treated with a second anti-TNF agent had a higher postinduction remission rate (p = 0.002), and drug survival (p = 0.0005). No other relevant factors were associated with treatment efficacy, including trough levels greater than 5 µg/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

VDZ, UST and a second anti-TNF agent exhibit similar efficacy in the short term, as second-biological line treatment in patients with CD who are refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, but shorter drug maintenance is observed for patients treated with UST.

A Systematic Review on the interest of Drug Tolerant assay in the monitoring of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies, of which infliximab (IFX) is most commonly used. Loss of response (LOR) to anti-TNF therapy due to immunogenic failure accounts for 20% of subsequent medical intervention and is defined, using a drug sensitive assay, as low or undetectable concentration of drug with high titers of anti-drug antibodies (ADAb). We performed a systematic review to investigate the use of a drug tolerant assay during both induction and maintenance to monitor patients treated with anti-TNFs. After the search on PubMed, 90 publications were reviewed. Most ADAb detection methods are drug sensitive, cannot detect ADAb in the presence of drug, and therefore cannot be used close to drug administration, when the drug concentration is too high. To overcome this major limitation, several drug-tolerant techniques have been developed and will be discussed in this review. Using drug-tolerant assays ADAb against infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADM) can be detected during induction and predict primary non-response or LOR. Drug sensitive assays do not allow detection of ADAb during the induction phase as IFX or ADM concentration is typically high.

Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Versus Conventional Management for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been proposed to improve outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α antagonists. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing proactive TDM with conventional management in patients with IBD.

METHODS

We identified RCTs in patients with IBD treated with TNFα antagonists comparing proactive TDM (routine assessments of trough concentration with dose adjustments to maintain predetermined trough concentration, regardless of disease activity) with conventional management (clinically driven dose adjustments). The primary outcome was failure to maintain clinical remission. Certainty of evidence was appraised using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations.

RESULTS

On meta-analysis of 9 RCTs (8 RCTs in adults, and focusing on maintenance phase), there was no significant difference in the risk of failing to maintain clinical remission in patients who underwent proactive TDM (267/709; 38%) vs conventional management (292/696; 42%) (relative risk [RR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.13) with moderate heterogeneity (inconsistency index = 36%) (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations; low certainty evidence), with no differences in patients with Crohn's disease (RR, 0.87 ; 95% CI, 0.66-1.15) and ulcerative colitis (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.72-1.07). Disease duration, concomitant immunomodulators, disease activity at baseline, and optimization of therapy before randomization did not modify this association. No differences were observed in risk of developing antidrug antibodies or serious adverse events. Patients in the proactive TDM arm were more likely to undergo dose escalation (RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.25-1.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine proactive TDM to target biologic concentration to specific thresholds, regardless of disease activity, did not offer clinical benefit in patients with IBD treated with TNFα antagonists in RCTs conducted to date. We cannot exclude the possibility of benefit in disease subtypes and phases of therapy (induction) not represented in these RCT populations.

Ulcerative Colitis and Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Patients Are Overlooked in Infliximab Population Pharmacokinetic Models: Results from a Comprehensive Review

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is part of the inflammatory bowels diseases, and moderate to severe UC patients can be treated with anti-tumour necrosis α monoclonal antibodies, including infliximab (IFX). Even though treatment of UC patients by IFX has been in place for over a decade, many gaps in modelling of IFX PK in this population remain. This is even more true for acute severe UC (ASUC) patients for which early prediction of IFX pharmacokinetic (PK) could highly improve treatment outcome. Thus, this review aims to compile and analyse published population PK models of IFX in UC and ASUC patients, and to assess the current knowledge on disease activity impact on IFX PK. For this, a semi-systematic literature search was conducted, from which 26 publications including a population PK model analysis of UC patients receiving IFX therapy were selected. Amongst those, only four developed a model specifically for UC patients, and only three populations included severe UC patients. Investigations of disease activity impact on PK were reported in only 4 of the 14 models selected. In addition, the lack of reported model codes and assessment of predictive performance make the use of published models in a clinical setting challenging. Thus, more comprehensive investigation of PK in UC and ASUC is needed as well as more adequate reports on developed models and their evaluation in order to apply them in a clinical setting.

Dashboard-Driven Accelerated Infliximab Induction Dosing Increases Infliximab Durability and Reduces Immunogenicity

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Accelerated infliximab (IFX) induction is often based on clinical parameters as opposed to pharmacokinetics (PK). We aimed to investigate the impact of dashboard-guided optimized induction dosing on IFX durability and immunogenicity in a real-world inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) setting.

METHODS

Pediatric and adult IBD patients were enrolled in a prospective single arm intervention trial. Cumulative data from each infusion (INF), weight, albumin, C-reactive protein, IFX dose, IFX trough level, and antidrug antibody presence were used to inform subsequent INF dosing. Forecasts driven by adaptive Bayesian modeling were generated to maintain trough levels for the third (INF3) and fourth (INF4) infusions of 17 μg/mL and 10 μg/mL, respectively. The primary outcome was proportion of patients prescribed accelerated dosing (AD) intervals by INF3 (<22 days) or INF4 (<49 days). Secondary outcomes included week 52 clinical and PK outcomes. Multivariate analyses and Kaplan-Meier curves compared outcomes based on adherence to dashboard forecasts.

RESULTS

Of the 180 per-protocol population, AD was forecast for 41% (INF3) and 69% (INF4) of patients with median intervals of 17 (INF3) and 39 (INF4) days. Baseline age >18 years, albumin >3.5 g/L, and 10-mg/kg dose were independently associated with lower rates of AD by INF4. Nonadherence with the INF4 forecast (n = 39) was an independent predictor of antidrug antibody (P < .0001) and IFX discontinuation (P = .0006). A total of 119 of 123 patients on IFX at week 52 were in steroid-free remission.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of a PK dashboard during induction can optimize dosing early to improve IFX durability and immunogenicity.

Under the Umbrella of Clinical Pharmacology: Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Infliximab and Adalimumab, and a Bridge to an Era of Biosimilars

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have revolutionized the treatment of many chronic inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD is a term that comprises two quite similar, yet distinctive, disorders—Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Two blockbuster MAbs, infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL), transformed the pharmacological approach of treating CD and UC. However, due to the complex interplay of pharmacology and immunology, MAbs face challenges related to their immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safety. To ease the burden of IBD and other severe diseases, biosimilars have emerged as a cost-effective alternative to an originator product. According to the current knowledge, biosimilars of IFX and ADL in IBD patients are shown to be as safe and effective as their originators. The future of biosimilars, in general, is promising due to the potential of making the health care system more sustainable. However, their use is accompanied by misconceptions regarding their effectiveness and safety, as well as by controversy regarding their interchangeability. Hence, until a scientific consensus is achieved, scientific data on the long-term effectiveness and safety of biosimilars are needed.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Used in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Therapeutic options for the management of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] have been expanding in recent decades. New biological and small molecule therapies have been incorporated into the pharmacological arsenal, allowing a more personalized management, and seeking increasingly strict remission goals. However, the fear of developing adverse events represents one of the most important limitations in deciding its use by patients and by a multidisciplinary team. Despite the risk of hepatotoxicity of thiopurines and methotrexate, these drugs are still used either as monotherapy or as combined therapy with anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] biological agents. Although drug-induced liver injury [DILI] appears to be less frequent with anti-TNF agents, newer biologics and small molecules, liver tests should be considered in the follow-up of these patients, especially regarding future combined therapy of biologics or of these drugs with small molecules. The objective of this review is to show data on the risk of developing DILI in patients with IBD who are undergoing treatment with traditional therapy or new drugs, whether biological or small molecules.

Recommendations on the Appropriate Management of Steroids and Discharge Planning During and After Hospital Admission for Moderate-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Results of a RAND Appropriateness Panel

INTRODUCTION

Limited guidance exists for the postdischarge care of patients with ulcerative colitis hospitalized for moderate-severe flares.

METHODS

RAND methodology was used to establish appropriateness of inpatient and postdischarge steroid dosing, discharge criteria, follow-up, and postdischarge biologic or small molecule initiation. A literature review informed on the panel's voting, which occurred anonymously during 2 rounds before and after a moderated virtual session.

RESULTS

Methylprednisolone 40-60 mg intravenous every 24 hours or hydrocortisone 100 mg intravenous 3 times daily is appropriate for inpatient management, with methylprednisolone 40 mg being appropriate if intolerant of higher doses. It is appropriate to discharge patients once rectal bleeding has resolved (Mayo subscore 0-1) and/or stool frequency has returned to baseline frequency and form (Mayo subscore 0-1). It is appropriate to discharge patients on 40 mg of prednisone after observing patients for 24 hours in hospital to ensure stability before discharge. For patients being discharged on steroids without in-hospital biologic or small molecule therapy initiation, it is appropriate to start antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy after discharge for anti-TNF-naive patients. For anti-TNF-exposed patients, it is appropriate to start vedolizumab or ustekinumab for all patients and tofacitinib for those with a low risk of adverse events. It is appropriate to follow up patients clinically within 2 weeks and with lower endoscopy within 4-6 months after discharge.

DISCUSSION

We provide recommendations on the inpatient and postdischarge management of patients with ulcerative colitis hospitalized for moderate-severe flares.

Barriers From Third-Party Payers to Biologic Use in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Biologic agents are now standard of care in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The ability to use biologics in clinical practice is in part dictated by insurance company policies. There is a long delay between adult and pediatric approval of biologic agents, and these therapies are often denied by third-party payers for use in pediatric IBD patients. This study prospectively identified pediatric patients with IBD who were started on a biologic medication at our institution, and third-party payer decisions were recorded. There were no denials in patients with Medicaid, but private payers frequently interfered with use of biologic agents. Reasons for denial are generally for use of a specific off-label agent or dosing of an approved agent. These denials lead to delayed treatment, nonmedically sound changes in therapy, and increased administrative burden on providers.

Multi-utility of therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment targets have progressed over time from clinical response to clinical and endoscopic remission. Several data have shown a positive correlation between serum biologic drug concentrations and favorable therapeutic outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has evolved as an important approach for optimizing the use of immunobiologics, especially antitumor necrosis factor therapy, in patients with IBD. The use of TDM is supported by medical societies and IBD experts in different contexts; however, challenges remain due to knowledge gaps that limit the widespread use of it. The aim of this review is to assess the role of TDM in IBD, focusing on the implementation of this strategy in different scenarios and demonstrating the multi-utility aspects of this approach in clinical practice.

Subcutaneous injection of infliximab CT-P13 results in stable drug levels within 14-day treatment cycle in Crohn's disease

The new subcutaneous (sc) formulation of the infliximab (IFX) biosimilar CT-P13 results in homogeneous serum trough concentrations of IFX at steady state. The present study aimed to investigate in Crohn's disease (CD) patients the intra-individual variations of IFX drug levels at multiple time-points during 2 consecutive cycles of maintenance therapy with CT-P13 sc.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CD patients in clinico-biological remission under maintenance therapy with intravenous (iv) IFX/CT-P13 were switched to CT-P13 sc 8 weeks (W) after the last infusion. They were treated with CT-P13 sc, 120 mg every 2 W. Assessments were performed from 8 W after starting CT-P13 sc and patients had to attend 6 visits on 2 consecutive cycles of treatment (cycles A and B). Visits were scheduled on days 4-6 (visit 1), days 7-9 (visit 2) and day 14 (visit 3) of each cycle, where days 1 and 14 were the days of sc injection of CT-P13. At each visit, peripheral blood was collected to measure serum IFX levels and anti-drug antibodies.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent 120 evaluations. Large intra-individual variations of serum drug levels of IFX were observed. When pooling the 120 evaluations, the mean drug level was 11.3 ± 4.9 μg/ml, and the median drug level was 10.9 μg/ml (IQR 7.5-15.5). During each cycle, the median drug levels were similar between visits 1 and 2 as well as between visits 1 and 3 and between visits 2 and 3. In cycle A, median drug levels were 11.1 μg/ml (7.8-14.5), 12.0 μg/ml (7.2-16.1) and 11.0 μg/ml (7.5-15.1) at V1, V2 and V3, respectively. Similar results were obtained in cycle B, where median drug levels were 11.6 μg/ml (7.9-14.9), 11.4 μg/ml (8.1-15.2) and 10.9 μg/ml (7.9-15.6) at V1, V2 and V3, respectively. In univariate analysis, we failed to identify factors predictive of low drug levels.

CONCLUSIONS

IFX drug levels are quite stable within 14-day treatment cycle, without trough levels in CD patients in remission during the maintenance therapy with CT-P13 sc. In patients with inactive CD under maintenance therapy with CT-P13 sc, therapeutic drug monitoring of IFX can be performed at any time between two CT-P13 sc injections.

Methotrexate in inflammatory bowel disease: A primer for gastroenterologists

Methotrexate is an antineoplastic agent that is also used at lower doses for anti-inflammatory properties. Along with thiopurines (azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine), it has historically been an important part of pharmacological treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Despite an increase in therapeutic options, these immunomodulators continue to play important roles in the management of inflammatory bowel disease, used either as a monotherapy in mild to moderate cases or in combination with monoclonal antibodies to prevent immunogenicity and maintain efficacy. In light of data linking the use of thiopurines with the risk of malignancies, methotrexate has regained attention as a potential alternative. In this article, we review data on the pharmacology, safety, and efficacy of methotrexate and discuss options for the positioning of methotrexate alone, or in combination, in therapeutic algorithms for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.