Surgical Versus Non-Surgical Methods for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Return to Play and Functional Outcomes Following Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Return to play (RTP) and functional outcomes are critical to treatment success for acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR). This systematic review and meta-analysis explored treatment superiority essential in optimal treatment selection concerning individual patients and their expectations regarding RTP and functional outcomes. This study was in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. The included studies were assessed regarding the level and quality of evidence. Fixed-effects models were employed for I2 < 25% and random-effects models for I2 ≥ 25%. The RTP rate meta-analysis of surgical vs conservative treatment revealed no significant difference. This was similar to the subgroup analysis of open repair and conservative treatment. The RTP rate and Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) meta-analysis of open repair + earlier rehabilitation (ER) vs + later rehabilitation (LR) also revealed no significant differences. The mean time to RTP meta-analysis of open repair + ER vs + LR showed that open repair + ER was significantly favored (-4.19 weeks; p = .002). The ATRS meta-analysis of conservative treatment with ER vs with LR revealed no significant difference. This meta-analysis has revealed that the RTP rates following treatment of AATR are high. Therefore, the decision for surgical vs conservative treatment or open repair + ER vs + LR for AATR should not be selected based on the expectation of RTP. However, open repair + ER can be advocated over + LR for reduced mean time to RTP.

Reverse Fragility Index Comparing Rates of Rerupture After Open Achilles Tendon Repair Versus Early Functional Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Despite similar published rates of rerupture among patients treated with early functional rehabilitation and open repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture, uncertainty still exists regarding the optimal treatment modality. The reverse fragility index (RFI) is a statistical tool that provides an objective measure of the study's neutrality by determining the number of events that need to change for a nonsignificant result to be significant.

PURPOSE

The purpose was to utilize the RFI to appraise the strength of neutrality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the rerupture rates of acute Achilles tendon ruptures treated with open repair versus early functional rehabilitation.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed including all RCTs comparing the rerupture rates after operative repair and early functional rehabilitation for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Studies were included that explicitly used early functional rehabilitation, defined as weightbearing and exercise-based interventions initiated within 2 weeks, as compared with open repair and reported a nonsignificant difference in rerupture rates. The RFI, with rerupture as the primary outcome, was calculated for each study (significance threshold, P < .05). The RFI quantifies a study's strength of neutrality and is defined as the minimum number of event reversals necessary to change a nonsignificant result to statistically significant.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs were included, with 713 patients and 46 reruptures. The median (interquartile range) rerupture rate was 7.69% (6.38%-9.64%) overall, 4.00% (2.33%-7.14%) in the operative group, and 10.00% (5.26%-12.20%) in the nonoperative group. The median RFI was 3, indicating that an outcome reversal of 3 patients was necessary to change the results from nonsignificant to statistically significant. The median number of patients lost to follow-up was 6 (3-7). Of 9 studies, 7 (77.8%) had a loss to follow-up greater than or equal to its RFI.

CONCLUSION

The statistical nonsignificance of studies reporting equivalent rerupture rates in the management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures with open repair versus nonoperative management with early functional rehabilitation can be reversed by changing the outcome status of only a few patients.

Lateral meniscus posterior root repair in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores joint mechanics to the intact state and improves clinical function: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes following lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

A literature search was performed systematically using PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases in April 2022. The search included the following terms combined with Boolean operators: 'Meniscus repairs', 'Meniscal Repair', 'Posterior Horn', 'Root', 'Radial'. Inclusion criteria consisted of level I-IV human clinical and biomechanical studies reporting biomechanical data and/or outcomes following LMPR repair in the setting of ACLR.

RESULTS

Three biomechanical studies, all utilizing a transtibial pullout technique, were identified, all of which reported significant improvement in joint contact pressures and mechanics and 3/4 of which reported significant improvement in anterior or rotational stability with LMPR repair. Five clinical studies, consisting of 146 patients (mean age 28.5 ± 1.1 years) undergoing LMPR repair, were identified with an average follow-up of 19.1 months (range 6.2-46 months). Across all clinical studies, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were found to improve postoperatively, with 3/4 reporting significant improvement in Lysholm (all, p ≤ 0.001) scores and 3/5 reporting significant improvement in IKDC scores when compared to preoperative values (all, p ≥ 0.004). Meniscal extrusion decreased significantly following repair in 2/4 studies (all, p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanically, transtibial pullout repair of the LMPR restored joint contact pressures and joint mechanics to intact levels when performed with concomitant ACLR. Clinically, LMPR repair with concurrent ACLR resulted in improved Lysholm and IKDC scores. These findings enable surgeons to determine optimal treatment plans and discuss realistic outcomes with patients when encountering LMPR injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Rates of Operative Management for Achilles Tendon Rupture Over the Last Decade and the Influence of Gender and Age

BACKGROUND

With emerging evidence supporting functional rehabilitation for Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs), this study sought to evaluate the treatment trends for patients sustaining an acute ATR and whether gender and age may influence the rates of operative repair.

METHODS

A retrospective database review identified ATRs from 2010 through 2019. Patients were then stratified into three cohorts based on age (18-30, 30-45, and 46 and older), separated by gender, and then assessed whether patients were treated operatively or not. Cochran-Armitage Trend test was performed to analyze the trends of operative management. Chi-square analyses were performed to assess whether the proportion of patients who received operative management in each age cohort differed from 2010 to 2019. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess whether gender influenced treatment.

RESULTS

Over the previous decade, the total rates of operative treatment for ATR significantly decreased (18.3%-12.3%, P < .0001). Each individual age cohort experienced a proportional decrease in operative management when comparing 2010 with 2019 (all P < .0001). Within all age cohorts, males were significantly more likely to receive operative treatment for an ATR over the previous decade (odds ratios: 2.63-3.22). Conclusion. Overall rates of operative management for ATR decreased across all cohorts likely due to previous studies providing evidence of similar results between operative and nonoperative managements. Over the previous decade, males were demonstrated to be far more likely than females to undergo operative management. Why females are less likely to receive an operation for ATR is likely multi-factorial and requires further exploration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Retrospective comparative study.

Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 50 Most Cited Studies on Achilles Tendon Pathology

Background

The development of Achilles tendon treatment modalities has been rapid, and it is increasingly difficult for clinicians to stay up to date with the most influential studies in this field. In order to fully understand the current state of the literature regarding Achilles tendon injury, it is invaluable to be familiar with the foundational articles and studies upon which the field is built.

Purpose

To objectively determine the 50 most frequently cited studies in Achilles tendon pathology and to conduct a bibliometric analysis.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

The Clarivate Analytics Web of Knowledge database was used to gather data and metrics of Achilles tendon research. The 50 most cited articles were selected for analysis from an initial 17,244 identified articles. The information extracted for each article included author name, publication year, country of origin, journal name, study type, and level of evidence.

Results

For these 50 studies, the total number of citations was calculated to be 13,159, with a mean of 263.2 citations per paper. The most cited article collected 657 citations. The publication dates of the 50 studies included in this analysis spanned 41 years (1972-2013). The largest number of articles were published by Swedish authors (n = 14); however, many other countries were represented, including Canada and Finland (n = 6 articles each). The most prevalent study designs were cohort studies (n = 13) with level 4 evidence studies being the most common (n = 14).

Conclusion

Among the 50 most influential articles in Achilles tendon pathology, the study designs most commonly used were cohort studies and review articles. Sweden was the country of origin for the most studies included on this list, which reflects this country's interest and commitment to researching Achilles tendon injuries and treatments.

Lower re-rupture rates but higher complication rates following surgical versus conservative treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses

PURPOSE

To systematically review and evaluate the current meta-analyses for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR). This study can provide clinicians with a clear overview of the current literature to aid clinical decision-making and the optimal formulation of treatment plans for AATR.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched PubMed and Embase on June 2, 2022 based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Assessment of evidence was twofold: level of evidence (LoE) and quality of evidence (QoE). LoE was evaluated using published criteria by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and the QoE by the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) scale. Pooled complication rates were highlighted for significance in favour of one treatment arm or no significance.

RESULTS

There were 34 meta-analyses that met the eligibility criteria, with 28 studies of LoE 1, and the mean QoE was 9.8 ± 1.2. Significantly lower re-rupture rates were reported with surgical (2.3-5%) versus conservative treatment (3.9-13%), but conservative treatment was favoured in terms of lower complication rates. The re-rupture rates were not significantly different between percutaneous repair or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared to open repair, but MIS was favoured in terms of lower complication rates (7.5-10.4%). When comparing rehabilitation protocols following open repair (four studies), conservative treatment (nine studies), or combined (three studies), there was no significant difference in terms of re-rupture or obvious advantage in terms of lower complication rates between early versus later rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review found that surgical treatment was significantly favoured over conservative treatment for re-rupture, but conservative treatment had lower complication rates other than re-rupture, notably for infections and sural nerve injury. Open repair had similar re-rupture rates to MIS, but lower complication rates; however, the rate of sural nerve injuries was lower in open repair. When comparing earlier versus later rehabilitation, there was no difference in re-rupture rates or obvious advantage in complications between open repair, conservative treatment, or when combined. The findings of this study will allow clinicians to effectively counsel their patients on the postoperative outcomes and complications associated with different treatment approaches for AATR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Rerupture and wound complications following Achilles tendon repair: A systematic review

Despite the relatively high frequency of Achilles ruptures, there is no general consensus on the optimal treatment method. A general trend toward more patients being treated nonoperatively has emerged recently with the advent of functional rehabilitation. However, much of the recent data on this subject has been highly variable. This systematic review focused on Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) treatment outcomes, with a focus on rerupture and complication rates. This systematic review specifically focused on articles regarding ATR treatment that also included rerupture and complication rates. Treatments were divided into three categories: open minimally invasive, open standard, and nonoperative. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare complication and rerupture rates among pairs of treatment options, as well as between early weight bearing versus immobilization. There was significantly higher complications for minimally invasive compared to nonoperative treatment (risk ratio [RR] = 4.4154; p < 0.05), lower complication rates for minimally invasive compared to open treatment (RR = 0.3231; p < 0.05), and higher complications for open standard compared to nonoperative treatment (RR = 5.6350; p < 0.001). There were significantly lower rerupture rates in minimally invasive compared to nonoperative treatment (RR = 0.4085; p < 0.001), a significantly lower rerupture rate in nonoperative treatment compared to open treatment (RR = 0.2282; p < 0.001), and no significant difference in rerupture rates when comparing minimally invasive to open standard treatment. We found that operative treatment is associated with fewer reruptures and more complications than a nonoperative approach. Minimally invasive surgery appears to be associated with a lower rate of complications than open operative treatment.

The Efficacy of Posterior Fasciotomy Versus Inserted Vacuum Drainage in Reducing Postoperative Surgical Site Infection in Open Achilles Tendon Repair: A Prospective Cohort Study With Inverse Probability Treatment Weight Propensity Score Analysis

Posterior crural fasciotomy (PF) may reduce postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) rate compared to inserted vacuum suction drainage (VD) in open Achilles tendon repair surgery. Thus, we aimed to compare the postoperative SSI rate between PF and VD in open Achilles's tendon repair surgery. A prospective, single-centered, nonrandomized controlled study of consecutive adult patients undergoing primary open Achilles tendon repair was performed at tertiary referral hospital between January 2017 and January 2020. Patients received either PF or VD from 2 experienced surgeons. Data were collected on demographic, clinical, and intraoperative characteristics along with postoperative SSI and other outcomes. The primary outcome was SSI rate. Secondary outcomes were Achilles tendon total rupture score, functional foot index, and visual analogue scale. A total of 60 patients were eligible and included in the final analysis (PF group n = 30 and VD group n = 30). Two (6.7%) patients in the PF group and 5 (16.7%) patients in the VD group experience postoperative SSI (crude risk ratio 0.40; 95% confidence interval 0.08, 1.90; p = .228). In inverse-probability-treatment-weighted propensity score analysis, the PF group had a significantly lower SSI rate than the VD group (adjusted risk ratio 0.30; 95% confidence interval 0.01, 0.91; p = .033). Inverse-probability-treatment-weighted propensity score analysis of Achilles tendon total rupture score along with crude analysis of total functional foot index and visual analogue scale were also significantly better in the PF group than the VD group (all p < .05). PF during open Achilles repair was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative SSI infection rate compared to VD.

Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles ruptures in the high demand patient: Using decision analysis to help clinical decisions

BACKGROUND

Recent literature suggests that functional treatment of acute non-insertional Achilles tendon ruptures yields outcomes (re-rupture and function) similar to those of surgery, but does not address the unique issues in treating high performance athletes or other high demand patients.

METHODS

Decision analysis was used to develop an estimate of outcome utility for both types of treatment using published Costs and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) values. The expected value for either treatment was then calculated for high, intermediate, and normal demand patients, using the specific functional needs of the patients.

RESULTS

Nonoperative treatment is the preferred management for normal demand patients, while high and intermediate demand patients are more likely to experience better expected functional outcomes from surgery.

CONCLUSION

The combination of a decision analysis and expected value analysis provides evidence-based support for the existing intuitive recommendations that favor surgical treatment in elite athletes and other high demand patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Open Achilles Tendon Repair

Background

An open Achilles tendon repair is performed in patients who have suffered an acute rupture. All patients with this injury should be counseled on their treatment options, which include open operative repair and functional rehabilitation. We prefer the use of an open repair in high-level athletes and those who have delayed presentation. Typically, this injury-and the resulting open repair-are seen in young or middle-aged patients as well as athletes. Operative repair of a ruptured Achilles tendon is associated with a much faster return to activity/sport when compared with nonoperative alternatives. This surgical procedure is especially useful in allowing this patient population to return to their previous activity level and functional capacity as quickly as possible.

Description

Open repair of a ruptured Achilles tendon begins with a 6 to 8-cm incision over the posteromedial aspect of the lower leg. Superficial and deep dissections are performed until the 2 ends of the ruptured tendon are identified. Adhesions are debrided to adequately mobilize and define the proximal and distal segments of the tendon. With use of a fiber tape suture, a modified locking Bunnell stitch is utilized to secure both ends. The fiber tape is tied securely, and the repair is reinforced with Vicryl suture (Ethicon). Once the tendon is repaired, the paratenon layer is identified and repaired with a running 0 or 2-0 Vicryl suture. This is an important step to minimize postoperative wound complications. The wound is then closed, and the extremity is splinted in maximum plantar flexion.

Alternatives

Alternative treatments include minimally invasive surgical techniques such as percutaneous Achilles tendon repair and nonoperative treatment with functional rehabilitation, which can provide excellent outcomes but can also lead to a slight decrease in explosiveness as the patient returns to sport1,2.

Rationale

Nonoperative and operative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture can both result in excellent patient outcomes. Appropriate patient selection is critical. Younger patients hoping to return to more highly competitive athletics should consider operative repair3. Possible differences have been identified in peak torque when comparing operative versus nonoperative treatment, with patients who had undergone operative repair having greater peak torque (i.e., explosiveness)2. Otherwise, findings are similar between treatment options as long as the patients meet the criteria for nonoperative treatment.

Expected Outcomes

Overall, the scientific literature demonstrates that the functional outcomes following operative repair are good to excellent. In a study by Hsu et al.4, 88% of patients were able to return to their baseline level of activity by 5 months postoperatively, with a complication rate of 10.6% and no reruptures. In a recent meta-analysis by Meulenkamp et al.5, the authors found that operative repair of Achilles tendon rupture was associated with a reduced risk of rerupture compared with primary immobilization (i.e., conventional cast immobilization with delayed weight-bearing for at least 6 weeks only). However, open surgical repair, minimally invasive repair, and functional rehabilitation all had similar risk of rerupture5. In a review by Ochen et al.6 that analyzed 29 studies with a total of 15,862 patients, operative repair was associated with a significantly lower risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment (2.3% versus 3.9%, respectively). However, operative treatment was also associated with a significantly higher complication rate compared with nonoperative treatment (4.9% versus 1.6%, respectively)6. Finally, in a meta-analysis by Soroceanu et al.7, the authors found that if early range-of-motion protocols and functional rehabilitation were utilized, operative and nonoperative treatment resulted in similar outcomes and equivalent rates of rerupture.

Important Tips

To prevent rerupture of an Achilles tendon, remind patients to engage in adequate stretching and warming prior to physical activity.Palpate and locate the tendon defect prior to making the first incision.Immobilize the ankle joint in a splint for 2 weeks postoperatively in maximum plantar flexion.Pitfalls include:○ Poor suture management leading to tangling in the repair.○ Undertensioning or overtensioning of the repair, which can be avoided by sterilely draping out both legs and checking resting tension intraoperatively.○ Failure to close the paratenon, causing scarring of the skin or surrounding tissues, which can be avoided by making a relieving incision on the deep surface of the paratenon.○ Leaving suture knots on the dorsal side of the repair that may aggravate the skin.

Acronyms & Abbreviations

MRI = magnetic resonance imagingESU = electrosurgical unit.

Operative vs Nonoperative Management of Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Cost Analysis

Background

Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is a common injury with a growing incidence rate. Treatment is either operative or nonoperative. However, evidence is lacking on the cost comparison between these modalities. The objective of this study is to investigate the cost differences between operative and nonoperative treatment of ATR using a large national database.

Methods

Patients who received treatment for an ATR were abstracted from the large national commercial insurance claims database, Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (n = 100 825) and divided into nonoperative (n = 75 731) and operative (n = 25 094) cohorts. Demographics, location, and health care charges were compared using multivariable regression analysis. Subanalysis of costs for medical services including clinic visits, imaging studies, opioid usage, and physical therapy were conducted. Patients who underwent secondary repair were excluded.

Results

Operative treatment was associated with increased net and total payments, coinsurance, copayment, deductible, coordination of benefits (COB) / savings, greater number of clinic visits, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, and physical therapy (PT) sessions, and with higher net costs due to clinic visits, radiographs, MRIs, and PT (P < .001). Operative repair at an ambulatory surgical center was associated with a lower net and total payment, and a significantly higher deductible compared to in-hospital settings (P < .001). Both cohorts received similar numbers of opioid prescriptions during the study period. Yet, operative patients had a significantly shorter duration of opioid use. After controlling for confounders, operative repair was also independently associated with lower net costs due to opioid prescriptions.

Conclusion

Compared with nonoperatively managed ATR, surgical repair is associated with greater costs partially because of greater utilization of clinic visits, imaging, and physical therapy sessions. However, surgical costs may be reduced when procedures are performed in ambulatory surgery centers vs hospital facilities. Nonoperative treatment is associated with higher prescription costs secondary to longer duration of opioid use.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Comparison of Ma-Griffith combined with a minimally invasive small incision to a modified suture technique for the treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures

Background

The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in the human body, although it is also prone to injury and rupture. Currently, the best treatment method for acute Achilles tendon rupture remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the Ma-Griffith method combined with a minimally invasive small incision (M-G/MISI) with the modified suture technique (MST).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who underwent treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture between January 2012 and January 2020 at our hospital. Demographic characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications were recorded, and data were statistically analyzed to compare the treatment efficacy of the two operative methods.

Results

A total of 67 patients were enrolled in the study, 34 of whom underwent M-G/MISI treatment, and 33 of whom underwent MST treatment. The intraoperative blood loss in the M-G/MISI group (16.47 ± 13.23 ml) was significantly lower than that in the MST group (34.55 ± 13.01 ml), and the difference was statistically significant (P ˂0.001). The incision in the M-G/MISI group (3.79 ± 1.81 cm) was significantly shorter than that in the MST group (5.79 ± 1.00 cm), and the difference was statistically significant (P˂0.001). The Achilles tendon rupture score and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were higher than those of the MST group at the sixth month after the operation (P˂0.001). Postoperatively, there was 1 case of traumatic Achilles tendon rupture in the M-G/MISI group and 1 case each of infection and deep vein thrombosis in the modified suture group.

Conclusions

Compared with the MST group, the M-G/MISI group had better Achilles tendon and ankle function scores at 6 months postoperatively, and less bleeding and shorter incisions. M-G/MISI is less invasive than MST.

Photobiomodulation Associated With Conservative Treatment for Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Double-Blind, Superiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

To investigate the effects of photobiomodulation on Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) treated conservatively.

Design

Prospective, patient- and assessor-blinded, parallel, randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Patients with acute ATR treated conservatively.

Participants

Thirty-four male individuals with acute unilateral ATR treated conservatively (N=34), equally divided in 2 groups: photobiomodulation group (PBMG) and sham group, with mean age of 45.5±9.47 and 48.7±8.38 years, respectively.

Intervention

All participants underwent through an immobilization period, followed by rehabilitation sessions (2 d/wk for 12 weeks) comprising strengthening, range of motion, and balance/weightbearing exercises. In PBMG, the tendon was irradiated with a photobiomodulation cluster (1 904 nm/50 mW infrared laser, 4 858 nm/50 mW infrared diodes, and 4 658 nm/40 mW red diodes; power density of 105 mW/cm² per cluster area) during the immobilization period (2 d/wk for 8 weeks) and the sham group received a simulation of the procedure with no irradiation. Outcomes were assessed at the removal of the immobilization 12 and 16 weeks after tendon rupture.

Main Outcome Measures

Primary outcome was the Achilles Tendon Rupture Score. Secondary outcomes included Numerical Pain Rating Scale at rest and during effort, plantar flexor strength, and ankle range of motion.

Results

Both groups demonstrated an increase in the Achilles Tendon Rupture Score and improvements in range of motion, plantar flexor strength, and pain. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the 2 groups (P>.05) except in pain during walking, which was significantly lower in the PBMG in week 12 (P<.01, effect size=0.56) and week 16 (P<.01, effect size=0.55).

Conclusion

Photobiomodulation associated with conservative treatment is not superior to conservative treatment alone for improving function in patients with acute ATR.

Achilles Tendon Ruptures and Repair in Athletes-a Review of Sports-Related Achilles Injuries and Return to Play

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Achilles tendon ruptures (ATR) are detrimental to sports performance, and optimal treatment strategy and guidelines on return to play (RTP) remain controversial. This current review investigates the recent literature surrounding nonoperative versus operative management of ATR, clinical outcomes, and operative techniques to allow the athlete a successful return to their respective sport.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Achilles tendon (AT) is crucial to the athlete, as it is essential for explosive activities such as running and jumping. Athletes that sustain an ATR play in fewer games and perform at a lower level of play compared to age-matched controls. Recent studies also theorize that ATRs occur due to elongation of the tendon with fatigue failure. Biomechanical studies have focused on comparing modes of fixation under dynamic loading to recreate this mechanism. ATRs can be career-ending injuries. Fortunately, the recent incorporation of early weight-bearing and functional rehabilitation programming for non-operative and operative patients alike proves to be beneficial. Especially for those treated nonoperatively, with the incorporation of functional rehabilitation, the risk of re-rupture among non-operative patients is beginning to approach the historical lower risk of re-rupture observed among patients treated operatively. Despite this progress in decreasing risk of re-rupture particularly among non-operative patients, operative managements are associated with unique benefits that may be of particular interest for athletes and active individuals. Recent studies demonstrate that operative intervention improves strength and functional outcomes with more efficacy compared to nonoperative management with rehabilitation. The current literature supports operative intervention in elite athletes to improve performance and shorten the duration to RTP. However, we acknowledge that surgical intervention does have inherent risks. Ultimately, most if not all young and/or high-level athletes with an ATR benefit from surgical repair, but it is crucial to take a stepwise algorithmic approach and consider other factors, which may lead towards nonoperative intervention. These factors include age, chronicity of injury, gap of ATR, social factors, and medical history amongst others in this review.

Operative vs Nonoperative Treatment of Achilles Tendon Ruptures Using Early Functional Rehabilitation: Critical Analysis of Evidence

BACKGROUND

Nonoperative treatment with functional rehabilitation of Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) has become more common because of claim of "equivalent" risk of rerupture compared to operative treatment. We investigated how current evidence corroborates the often-claimed "equal" or "nondifferent" complication rates.

METHODS

A search of meta-analyses in PubMed, CENTRAL, and Scopus was performed. Meta-analyses including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing open operative repair of ATR and nonoperative treatment with functional rehabilitation regarding reruptures and other complications were identified.

RESULTS

Four separate meta-analyses with 6 pooled treatment comparisons were identified. One of the 6 treatment effects (for risk ratio [RR]) showed a reduced risk of rerupture favoring operative treatment, whereas in the remaining analyses the null hypothesis assuming equal risk or an RR of 1 could not be rejected. The smallest RR (benefit in favor of surgery) that could be rejected based on the 95% CI was 0.28. The smallest risk difference that could be rejected in favor of surgery was 6.4%, indicating that nonoperative may have up to 6.4% higher rerupture rate. Treatment effects for complications other than rerupture had very large variability and imprecision.

CONCLUSION

The literature comparing surgery with nonoperative treatment using functional rehabilitation in ATR have been interpreted in favor of nonoperative treatment as the rerupture rates were falsely considered "equivalent." None of the published meta-analyses excluded a relative risk that is likely to affect the course of treatment in many cases. Increasing incidence of nonoperative treatment in ATRs is not clearly supported by current evidence.

Rates of complications in Achilles tendon rupture repair using absorbable and nonabsorbable suture material; A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The impact of suture type on tensile strength, re-rupture rates and infection risk in Achilles tendon rupture repair is not been well established. The aim of this review is to evaluate existing literature on the associated risk of postoperative infection with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials in Achilles tendon rupture repair.

METHODS

A systematic review of search databases PubMed; Google Scholar; and OVID Medline was made to identify studies related to complications associated with Achilles tendon rupture repair. PRISMA guidelines were utilised for this review. Meta-analysis was used to compare rupture rates and infections following rupture repair.

RESULTS

12 studies with a total of 460 patients, 230 in both nonabsorbable and absorbable suture groups were included for analysis. Risk of wound complications was significantly higher in patients with non-absorbable sutures (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Nonabsorbable braided sutures is associated with the highest risk of postoperative wound complications following Achilles tendon rupture repair.

Delayed Wound Healing After Achilles Tendon Suture: An Arthroscopic Solution

This technical note describes an arthroscopic technique for treating delayed wound healing after Achilles tendon suture. Ankle arthroscopy is used to clean up the inflammatory tissues and foreign bodies that lead to delayed wound healing, with the advantages of simple postoperative care and low infection risk. This method may provide a less traumatic and low-risk option for the treatment of delayed wound healing after Achilles tendon surgery. The purpose of this technical note is to describe surgical procedures and related recommendations.

The Reinforced Ma-Griffith Method Combined with Minimally Invasive Small-Incision Suture for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

Objective

To evaluate the treatment effects of the reinforced Ma‐Griffith method combined with a minimally invasive small incision(M‐G/MISI) in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture.

Methods

From January 2012 to January 2020, a retrospective study was carried out on thirty‐one patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures that were treated using the M‐G/MISI. Patient with acute Achilles tendon rupture was operated on in the prone position. The M‐G/MISI begin with making a small incision to debride the stumps of ruptured tendon. Then M‐G/MISI was used to suture the distal and proximal Achilles tendons with the help of a epidural puncture needle and polydioxanone synthetic absorbable suture (PDS) Ⅱ line. Finally the stumps of ruptured tendon was reattached. After the surgery, the affected limb was fixed with either a plaster slab below the knee brace or a functional brace. Removal of plaster external fixation and partial weight‐bearing with crutches five weeks after the operation; Complete weight‐bearing nine weeks after the operation; jogging permitted 12 weeks after the operation; Patients were allowed to resume normal activities six months after the operation.

Results

All 31 patients in this study were male. Nineteen of these patients had Achilles tendon rupture on the right lower extremity, while 12 had ruptures on the left lower extremity. The patients had a mean age of 33.35 ± 7.13 years (range, 18‐52 years). The mean operation time was 79.58 ± 22.67 minutes (range, 40‐167 minutes). The mean time from injury to operation was 4.19 ± 2.01 days (range, 1‐8 days), and the mean hospital stay was 9.87 ± 3.88 days (range, 5‐22 days). The new technique had a small incision with a mean length of 3.94 ± 1.82 cm (range, 2‐6 cm). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 16.77 ± 13.76 mL (range, 10‐50 mL) and the mean follow‐up time was 21.35 ± 10.18 months (range, 6‐50 months). No wound infection, fistula, skin necrosis, sural nerve damage, deep venous thrombosis or tendon re‐rupture was found. One year after the surgery, all patients reported 97.00 (range, 93‐100 points) AOFAS ankle‐hindfoot score points and the mean ATRS was 97.39 (range, 91‐100) points.

Conclusion

The reinforced Ma‐Griffith method, combined with a minimally invasive small incision suture, is a simple, effective, minimally invasive technique and low‐cost surgical method for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture.

Epidemiology of Achilles Tendon Rupture in South Korea: Claims Data of the National Health Insurance Service from 2009 to 2017

Background

The incidence of Achilles tendon rupture and its trend has not been studied in Asia. The purpose of this nationwide study was to analyze the trend of incidence and surgical treatment of tendon ruptures in South Korea based on sex, age, and income level of patients, as well as seasonal variation.

Methods

A descriptive epidemiologic study was performed based on the data collected retrospectively from the Korea National Health Insurance Service. Data of all outpatients and inpatients were collected from approximately 52 million residents of South Korea, primarily diagnosed with Achilles tendon rupture from 2009 to 2017.

Results

A total of 112,350 patients had Achilles tendon rupture, of which 44,248 patients underwent surgical treatment during the study period. The overall, age-specific, and sex-specific incidence of Achilles tendon rupture and surgical treatment showed an increasing trend. Patients in the age group of 41 to 50 years showed the highest increase in incidence. Regarding season, higher incidence was reported during spring and summer, whereas the lowest incidence was found in winter. Higher income level was associated with increased incidence of the condition.

Conclusions

The incidence of Achilles tendon rupture and surgical treatments increased rapidly in patients between 41 and 50 years of age. Patients in the higher income quintile groups experienced more Achilles tendon injury than those in lower income groups, and fewer ruptures were observed during winter.

Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complication Rates With Best- and Worst-Case Analyses for Rerupture Rates

BACKGROUND

An acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) is a common injury. The controversy that has surrounded the optimal treatment options for AATRs warrants an updated meta-analysis that is comprehensive, accounts for loss to follow-up, and utilizes the now greater number of available studies for data pooling.

PURPOSE

To meta-analyze the rates of all complications after the treatment of AATRs with a "best-case scenario" and "worst-case scenario" analysis for rerupture rates that assumes that all patients lost to follow-up did not or did experience a rerupture, respectively.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Two authors performed a systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines on February 17, 2020. The included studies were assessed in terms of the level of evidence, quality of evidence, and quality of the literature. A meta-analysis by fixed-effects models was performed if heterogeneity was low (I² < 25%) and by random-effects models if heterogeneity was moderate to high (I²≥ 25%).

RESULTS

Surgical treatment was significantly favored over nonsurgical treatment for reruptures. Nonsurgical treatment was significantly favored over surgical treatment for complications other than reruptures, notably infections. Minimally invasive surgery was significantly favored over open repair for complications other than reruptures (no difference for reruptures), in particular for minor complications.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that surgical treatment was superior to nonsurgical treatment in terms of reruptures. However, the number needed to treat analysis produced nonmeaningful values for all treatment options, except for surgical versus nonsurgical treatment and minimally invasive surgery versus open repair. No single treatment option was revealed to be profoundly favorable with respect to every complication. The results of this meta-analysis can guide clinicians and patients in their treatment decisions that should be made jointly and on a case-by-case basis.

Endoscopic "internal splinting" repair technique for acute Achilles tendon rupture

INTRODUCTION

Recently, endoscopically assisted Achilles tendon repair techniques have improved to overcome the surgical complications. However, the risk of sural nerve injury and the strength of repair are still the most concerning aspects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty three patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were reviewed in the present study. We stitch the Achilles tendon above the ruptured site using the endoscopic locking loop suture technique, and the knotless anchor suture-bridge technique can be used to make the distal fixation of threads. The function was assessed using the muscle power (MRC0-5), ATRS scores, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores, and VAS scores at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 15.74 ± 2.43 months (12-18). At the final follow-up, the average of the muscle power (MRC0-5), ATRS score, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, and VAS score are 4.74 ± 0.45, 97.83 ± 2.77, 96.52 ± 4.87, and 0.35 ± 0.49, respectively. Every patient returned to previous sports activity at 6 months postoperative. No wound infection and sural nerve injuries were encountered. Only one case suffers local irritation at the medial knotless anchor site.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic "internal splinting" repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture using locking loop stitch with suture-bridge technique leads to an expedited return to activity with a low risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

The Surgical Care Practitioner role in Achilles tendon re-rupture: A case study

The value of a Surgical Care Practitioner to an orthopaedic team is demonstrated in this case study of a patient who presented with a re-ruptured Achilles tendon. It highlights the role the practitioner plays in the patient journey and illustrates it's value throughout the clinical course from consultation through to discharge. The Surgical Care Practitioner, as a member of the extended surgical team can help to explain the diagnosis and associated treatment options, facilitate informed consent and provide expert procedural assistance to the surgeon. A Surgical Care Practitioner is ideally placed to answer patient queries and aid in rehabilitation.

Secondary reconstruction of chronic Achilles tendon rupture: flexor hallucis longus transfer versus plantaris longus augmentation

INTRODUCTION

Chronic Achilles tendon rupture is primarily caused by degenerative processes of multifactorial origin. In addition to secondary repair (SR) with augmentation of the plantaris longus tendon, the transfer of the flexor hallucis longus tendon (FHL) to the calcaneus is a recognised reconstruction procedure. This paper aims to provide a direct comparison based on clinical scores and objectifiable strength measurements.

METHODS

We analysed data for 60 patients (46 males and 14 females) with chronic Achilles tendon rupture, including 34 (mean age 57 years) treated with FHL and 26 (mean age 52 years) with SR between 2016 and 2020 (mean follow-up of 49 months). The follow-up included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scoring System (AOFAS-AH) and Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA), the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) and the objectifiable strength measurement using the dynamometer BIODEX®. Pre-existing gait disorders and permanent pain therapy led to exclusion.

RESULTS

The mean AOFAS-AH was 87.8 points (FHL: 85.6, SR: 90.6), the mean VAS FA was 78.1 points (FHL: 73.7, SR: 83.6), the mean PCS was 48.2 points (FHL: 46.3, SR: 50.7) and the mean MCS was 54.1 points (FHL: 55.0, SR: 53.0). The maximum torque for plantar flexion was 56.7 Nm on average (FHL: 51.0, SR: 63.7). A total of seven (11.7%) wound infections requiring revision occurred (FHL: 4 (11.8%), SR: 3 (11.5%)). All measurements did not differ significantly between the groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results of the study prove the equivalence of FHL and SR based on the clinical scores as well as on the strength measurement using BIODEX®. Nevertheless, a higher withdrawal because of morbidity with a tendency for prolonged incapacity to work in the FHL group has to be taken into account. The present work provides the basis for a prospective comparison in future studies.

Multiple comparisons of the efficacy and safety for six treatments in Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The choice of the best therapeutic regimen for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture (AATR) remains controversial. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapeutic regimens in AATR patients using a network meta-analysis of data from clinical randomized controlled trials.

MATERIAL/METHODS

The studies were abstracted from Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. RCTs meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata software, version 14.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).

RESULTS

38 randomized controlled trials involving 2480 participants were included. The studies were published between 1981 and 2019. A total of 6 therapeutic regimens -open repair (OR), minimally invasive repair (MIR) and nonoperative treatment (non) combined with traditional standard rehabilitation (TSR) and accelerated functional rehabilitation (AFR) - were included in the literature. The treatments were ranked based on the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) probability. In terms of the re-rupture rate, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: OR&AFR, OR&TSR, MIR&AFR, MIR&TSR, nonoperative treatment &AFR and nonoperative treatment &TSR. In terms of the wound-related complication, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: MIR&AFR, nonoperative treatment &AFR, MIR&TSR, nonoperative treatment &TSR, OR&AFR and OR&TSR. In terms of the sural nerve injury, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: non, OR and MIR. In terms of the deep venous thrombosis, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: MIR&AFR, OR&AFR, nonoperative treatment &AFR, OR&TSR, MIR&TSR and nonoperative treatment &TSR. In terms of the returning back to sport, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: MIR&TSR, OR&AFR, OR&TSR, nonoperative treatment &AFR, nonoperative treatment &TSR and MIR&AFR.

CONCLUSIONS

MIR can repair the ruptured Achilles tendon and narrow the tendon gap with low risk of complications. AFR is superior to TSR without increasing the risk of rerupture. MIR&AFR is the best therapeutic regime for AATR. More RCTs focused on AATR are needed to further indicate this conclusion.

Prospective randomized clinical trial of open operative, minimally invasive and conservative treatments of acute Achilles tendon tear

INTRODUCTION

The acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) is a common injury of great importance in an increasingly active society. When early functional treatment is established, recent literature shows comparable rates of re-rupture in conservative and surgical treatments of AATR. However, there is no study comparing the outcome using a dynamometer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of patients with AATR treated conservatively and surgically using a dynamometer. In addition, the data are compared to evaluation of the Achilles tendon with ultrasound.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2012 and 2015, 90 patients (mean age 41 years, male-to-female ratio 81:9) with AATR were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, and monocentric study. Thirty patients were assigned to each of the three different treatment groups. Group OPEN received a conventional open suture of the Achilles tendon, group MIN received a minimally invasive suture and patients in group CONS were treated conservatively. Follow-up treatment was the same for all patients regardless of the group they were assigned to. Plantar flexion force was assessed using a dynamometer (Biodex® System 3 Pro, Biodex Medical Systems). Further evaluation included a physical test and ultrasound of the Achilles tendon.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were available for a 24-month follow-up. In each of the OPEN and MIN groups, there was one re-rupture. In the CONS group, there were two re-ruptures. A positive correlation between the Biodex® dynamometer measurement and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score (AOFAS-AH) could be found in all groups. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups after 2 years. On sonography, all patients showed isolated structure loosening and a significantly thickened cross-sectional area compared with the non-injured opposite side, without differences between the groups. There was no correlation between the Biodex® measurement and sonographic outcome.

CONCLUSION

At 24-month follow-up, no significant difference can be found in patients with AATR treated operatively or conservatively. It is, therefore, important to inform patients with AATR regarding the respective advantages and disadvantages of the individual treatment strategies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Randomized controlled trial; level 1.

Endoscopic Surgery for Delayed Wound Healing After Achilles Tendon Suture Repair: A Report of Three Cases

Background

Delayed wound healing is a potention complication after Achilles tendon suture repair and occurs for various reasons. The conventional treatment for delayed wound healing is open surgery, but patients face long recovery times and postoperative care is difficult.

Case Presentation

This report presents three patients who were seen at our institute from April 2008 to October 2017 due to long‐term non‐healing wounds after surgery. All three patients had undergone surgery at least 2 months previously. We performed endoscopic surgery on these patients. After the operation, patients received less antibiotics and simpler care than would be required for conventional open surgery. There is no need to keep the wound open after the operation or perform wound cleaning for multiple times at the same time, which can reduce healing time. At the last follow up, all postoperative scores among the patients were significantly improved compared to before surgery. The Achilles tendon total rupture scores were excellent and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scores were satisfactory, indicating improvements in Achilles tendon function and movement in patients after surgery.

Conclusion

Our case reports demonstrate that arthroscopic treatment for delayed wound healing after Achilles tendon suture repair is satisfactory and reliable; frequent opening of the wound for cleaning is not required after the operation, thus reducing the healing time.

Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures

There is an ever-evolving debate about the best treatment option for Achilles tendon ruptures. There was a relative consensus that operative treatment yielded the best outcomes. Much of this is based on results in athletic populations. Conservative treatment was considered only for the elderly and those with very inactive lifestyles. There has been an evolution, however, with more surgeons utilizing an aggressive functional rehabilitation with conservative management. Surgical intervention still is the treatment of choice for elite-level athletes. The treatment of choice for patient populations other than elite athletes remains an individual choice between patient and physician.

Comparison of the double loop knot stitch and Kessler stitch for Achilles tendon repair: A biomechanical cadaver study

Tendon elongation after Achilles tendon (AT) repair is associated with the clinical outcome. Reliable suture techniques are essential to reduce gap formations and to allow early mobilization. Cyclic loading conditions represent the repetitive loading in rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to compare the Kessler stitch and double loop knot stitch (DLKS) in a cyclic loading program focussing on gap formation. Sixteen human cadaveric ATs were transected and sutured using either the Kessler stitch or DLKS (eight matched pairs). The suture-tendon configurations were subjected to cyclic loading and additional ultimate load to failure testing using the Zwick 1446 universal testing machine. Each AT survived cyclic loading, with a mean gap formation less than 5 mm after 1000 cycles. The mechanical properties of the Kessler stitch and DLKS were not significantly different after cyclic loading with a mean displacement of 4.57 mm (± 1.16) for the Kessler stitch and 4.85 mm (± 1.14) for the DLKS (P = .76). There were no significant differences in the ultimate load testing (P = .85). Both bioprotective techniques prevent excessive gaping in cyclic testing when tendon loading is moderate. Our data and those from literature of gap formation in cyclic and ultimate loading allow the conclusion, that early aggressive AT loading after repair (e.g. full weightbearing) overstrain simple as well as complex suture configurations. Initial intraoperative tightening of the knots (preloading) before locking is important to decrease postoperative elongation.

Management of Achilles Tendon Injuries in the Elite Athlete

The management of Achilles tendon rupture continues to be controversial in the everyday athlete; however, there is strong evidence indicating that surgical intervention is preferred in elite athletes due to the return of greater strength and peak torque. We review the published literature, as well as our operative technique and post-operative protocol in the management of Achilles tendon injuries in elite athletes.

Treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture - a multicentre, non-inferiority analysis

BACKGROUND

While numerous clinical studies have compared the surgical and non-surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR), there are no studies that have performed a non-inferiority analysis between treatments.

METHODS

Data from patients who were included in five randomised controlled trials from two different centres in Sweden were used. Outcomes at 1 year after ATR consisted of the patient-reported Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and the functional heel-rise tests reported as the limb symmetry index (LSI). The non-inferiority statistical 10% margin was calculated as a reflection of a clinically acceptable disadvantage in ATRS and heel-rise outcome when comparing treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 422 patients (350 males and 72 females) aged between 18 and 71 years, with a mean age of 40.6 (standard deviation 8.6), were included. A total of 363 (86%) patients were treated surgically. The ATRS (difference (Δ) = - 0.253 [95% confidence interval (CI); - 5.673;5.785] p = 0.36) and LSI of heel-rise height (difference = 1.43 [95% CI; - 2.43;5.59] p = 0.81), total work (difference = 0.686 [95% CI; - 4.520;6.253] p = 0.67), concentric power (difference = 2.93 [95% CI; - 6.38;11.90] p = 0.063) and repetitions (difference = - 1.30 [95% CI; - 6.32;4.13] p = 0.24) resulted in non-inferiority within a Δ - 10% margin for patients treated non-surgically.

CONCLUSION

The non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures is not inferior compared with that of surgery in terms of 1-year patient-reported and functional outcomes.