Pro: The General Anesthesiologist Should Be Trained and Certified in Transesophageal Echocardiography

A Multi-Country Survey on the Availability of Intraoperative Use of Echocardiography for Noncardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

This survey aimed to explore the availability and accessibility of echocardiography during noncardiac surgery worldwide.

METHODS

An internet-based 45-item survey was sent, followed by reminders from August 30, 2021, to August 20, 2022.

RESULTS

1189 responses were received from 62 countries. Nearly seventy-one percent of respondents had intraoperatively used transesophageal or transthoracic echocardiography (TEE and TTE, respectively) for monitoring or examination. The unavailability of echocardiography machines (30.3%), lack of trained personnel (30.2%), and absence of clinical indications (22.6%) were the top 3 reasons for not using intraoperative echocardiography in noncardiac surgery. About 61.5% of participants had access to at least one echocardiography machine. About 41% had access to at least 1 TEE probe, and 62.2% had access to at least 1 TTE probe. Seventy-four percent of centers had a procedure to request intraoperative echocardiography if needed for noncardiac cases. Intraoperative echocardiography service was immediately available in 58% of centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Echocardiography machines and skilled echocardiographers are still unavailable at many centers worldwide. National societies should aim to train a critical mass of certified TEE/TTE anesthesiologists and provide all anesthesiologists access to perioperative TEE/TTE machines in anesthesiology departments, considering the increasing number of older and sicker surgical patients scheduled for noncardiac surgery.

Transesophageal Ultrasound in Perioperative Hemodynamic Analysis of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can directly, real-time, and visually monitor cardiac structure, function, and volume status, and effectively guide perioperative volumetric therapy and vasoactive drug use in critically ill patients to improve rehabilitation treatment and prognosis. Therefore, TEE is considered to be the most comprehensive monitoring technology. The characteristics of reliability, continuity, and repeatability of TEE-guided perioperative hemodynamic management make it have obvious advantages in clinical application, and have gradually developed into a technology that anesthesiologists must master. In this article, we carried out the application of transesophageal echocardiography in perioperative hemodynamic management, with a view to providing clinical research evidence for further promoting the clinical application of TEE and optimizing the quality of perioperative hemodynamic management in critical patients. The experimental results show that before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, there is a decrease after cardiopulmonary bypass, but it is not reflected in invasive pressure monitoring. It is considered that the volume change is small, and it has not yet caused the pressure change. In other words, the pressure is estimated to some extent. The load state sensitivity is poor and can not really reflect the change of the front load. Compared to the large number of applications to assess systolic function, there are few studies using estimated left ventricular diastolic function. In addition to the complexity of the diastolic process itself, the area curve is susceptible to clutter interference, and the poor readability of the time differential curve is directly related.

Simulation-based training following a theoretical lecture enhances the performance of medical students in the interpretation and short-term retention of 20 cross-sectional transesophageal echocardiographic views: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Background

Both simulation-based training and video-based training serve as educational adjuncts for learning TEE among medical students. In the present study, we hypothesized that simulation-based training would better enhance the performance of medical students in the interpretation of 20 cross-sectional views compared to video-based training.

Methods

A total of 120 4th-year undergraduate medical students were enrolled in the present study. The study began with a pre-test of all the participants, followed by a 90-min theoretical lecture and a post-test. Subsequently, the participants were randomly divided into the video-based group (Group V) and simulation-based group (Group S). Next, Group V received 60 min of TEE video learning, while Group S received 60 min of TEE simulator training. After the respective training, both the groups undertook the retention-test 1 and retention-test 2, 1 week and 1 month later, respectively. The performance for each test was evaluated by five views, which were selected randomly and, respectively, from a set of 20 cross-sectional views. The primary outcome was the performance of the retention-test 1. Secondary outcomes included: (1) comparison the performances of the pre-test, post-test, and retention-test 2 between two groups; (2) comparison the performances of pre-test and post-test in the same group; (3) comparison the performances of retention-test 1, and retention-test 2 in the same group.

Results

Better performances were observed in Group S in both retention-test 1 (Group V: 63.2 [52.6, 77.6] vs. Group S: 89.5 [68.4, 100.0], P < 0.001) and retention-test 2 (Group V: 58.0 [48.0, 72.0] vs. Group S: 74.0 [64.0, 80.0], P < 0.001) compared to Group V. No statistically significant differences were observed in the performances of pre-test (Group V: 8.3 [4.2, 12.5] vs. Group S: 8.3 [4.2, 12.5], P = 0.825) or post-test (Group V: 46.2 [38.5, 57.7] vs. Group S: 44.2 [38.5, 56.7], P = 0.694) between the two groups. The improvement had been observed in the post-test, compared with pre-test in the same group, respectively (Group V in post-test: 46.2 [38.5, 57.7] vs. Group V in pre-test: 8.3 [4.2, 12.5], P < 0.001; Group S in post-test: 44.2 [38.5, 56.7] vs. Group S in pre-test: 8.3 [4.2, 12.5], P < 0.001). However, the performance in retention-test 2 was significantly reduced, compared with retention-test 1 in the same group, respectively (Group V in retention-test 2: 58.0 [48.0, 72.0] vs. Group V in retention-test 1: 63.2 [52.6, 77.6] P = 0.005; Group S in retention-test 2: 74.0 [64.0, 80.0] vs. Group S in retention-test 1: 89.5 [68.4, 100.0], P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Following a 90-min theoretical lecture, simulation-based training better enhanced the performance of medical students in the interpretation and short-term retention of 20 cross-sectional views compared to video-based training.

Trial registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2000033519, 3/June/2020).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-02753-1.

The year in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia: selected highlights from 2013

This article reviewed selected research highlights of 2013 that pertain to the specialty of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia. The first major theme is the commemoration of the sixtieth anniversary of the first successful cardiac surgical procedure with cardiopulmonary bypass conducted by Dr Gibbon. This major milestone revolutionized the practice of cardiovascular surgery and invigorated a paradigm of mechanical platforms for contemporary perioperative cardiovascular practice. Dr Kolff was also a leading contributor in this area because of his important contributions to the refinement of cardiopulmonary bypass and mechanical ventricular assistance. The second major theme is the diffusion of echocardiography throughout perioperative practice. There are now guidelines and training pathways to guide its generalization into everyday practice. The third major theme is the paradigm shift in perioperative fluid management. Recent large randomized trials suggest that fluids are drugs that require a precise prescription with respect to type, dose, and duration. The final theme is patient safety in the cardiac perioperative environment. A recent expert scientific statement has focused attention on this issue because most perioperative errors are preventable. It is likely that clinical research in this area will blossom because this is a major opportunity for improvement in our specialty. The patient care processes identified in these research highlights will further improve perioperative outcomes for our patients.

Innovative transesophageal echocardiography training and competency assessment for Chinese anesthesiologists: role of transesophageal echocardiography simulation training

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is playing an invaluable role in diagnosing and monitoring the patient's hemodynamics in both cardiac and noncardiac surgery. There have been many obstacles in TEE training.

RECENT FINDINGS

The TEE simulation provides an ideal environment for anesthesiologists to practice their echocardiography skills out of the operation room. It consists of a manikin and a dummy probe that enable the trainees to perform a hands-on operation with echocardiographic views and allow a virtual scene consisting of a three-dimensional cardiac model, probe tip and image plane be presented side by side simultaneously.

SUMMARY

The TEE simulator provides an easy comprehensive learning interface and a friendly environment without the psychological pressure and time limitation frequently experienced in the operation room. The simulator can also be used to assess and evaluate the trainees' manipulation skills, space thinking, and clinical judgment ability. TEE simulation-based training and testing can be an important part in TEE training curriculum before the trainees start their clinical training in the operation room.