Bivalirudin versus heparin as an anticoagulant during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case-control study

Meta-Analysis Comparing Bivalirudin Versus. Unfractionated Heparin in Adult Patients With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Introduction: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has traditionally been the agent of choice in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) have recently garnered more attention in ECMO because of their advantages over UFH. Given the heterogeneous results of multiple recent published studies, we performed a meta-analysis to describe pooled outcomes between bivalirudin and UFH anticoagulation in patients on ECMO. Methods: Relevant studies were identified from MEDLINE and Google Scholar database searches through April 23, 2022. The primary efficacy outcome was thromboembolism (TE), and secondary efficacy outcomes included all-cause mortality and circuit thrombosis. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Results: A total of 6 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Bivalirudin use was associated with significantly lower risk of TE (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38-.99; P = .05; I2 = 0%) and circuit thrombosis (OR 0.51; 95% CI .32-.80; P = .004; I2 = 0%) compared with UFH. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality risk (OR 0.75; 95% CI .52-1.09; P = .13; I2 = 30%) between the bivalirudin and UFH groups. No significant difference in the risk of major bleeding between 2 groups was found (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.25-1.81; P = .43; I2 = 80%). Conclusion: These data support that bivalirudin is a reasonable alternative to UFH in patients on ECMO. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm bivalirudin's efficacy and safety results compared with UFH.

Use of bivalirudin after initial heparin management among adult patients on long-term venovenous extracorporeal support as a bridge to lung transplant: A case series

A growing body of evidence supports the use of bivalirudin as an alternative to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the prevention of thrombotic events in patients on venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, data in patients bridged to lung transplantation are limited. In this case series, we describe the outcomes of six patients who were transitioned from UFH to bivalirudin during their course of VV ECMO support as a bridge to lung transplantation. All six patients were on VV ECMO support until transplant, with a median duration of 73 days. Bivalirudin demonstrated a shorter time to first therapeutic activated thromboplastin time (aPTT) level. Additionally, time in therapeutic range was longer while patients were receiving bivalirudin compared to UFH (median 92.9% vs. 74.6%). However, major bleeding and thrombotic events occurred while patients were receiving either anticoagulant. Based on our experience, bivalirudin appears to be a viable option for anticoagulation in VV ECMO patients bridged to lung transplantation. Larger studies evaluating the optimal anticoagulation strategy in patients bridged to transplant are needed.

Review of anticoagulation considerations in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

Since its first success in 1975, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used with increasing frequency for pulmonary and cardiopulmonary bypass. Use in adults has increased exponentially since the early 2000s, but despite thousands of international cannulations using both veno-arterial (VA) and veno-venous (VV) ECMO, there are still significant hemocompatibility-related adverse events. Current management of anticoagulation has been based on the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guidance published in 2014 with recent updates published in 2022. Despite this guidance, there is still limited international consensus on how to manage anticoagulation in ECMO. For this review, we completed a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases to identify studies pertaining to anticoagulation of adult patients on VV or VA-ECMO. The highest priority was given to sources that were prospective, randomized, controlled studies, but in the absence of such resources, observational studies, retrospective uncontrolled studies, and case series/reports were considered for inclusion. This document serves to provide a comprehensive review of the current understanding of management pertaining to anticoagulation relating to ECMO.

Anticoagulation strategies in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A network meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) plays an important role in providing temporary life support for patients with severe cardiac or pulmonary failure, but requires strict anticoagulation and monitoring. This network meta-analysis systematically explored the most effective anticoagulation and monitoring strategies for patients receiving ECMO.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to January 31, 2023, for studies comparing unfractionated heparin (UFH), argatroban (Arg), bivalirudin (Biv), and/or nafamostat mesylate (NM) in patients receiving ECMO. The primary outcomes included device-related thrombosis, patient-related thrombosis, and major bleeding events. The secondary outcomes included ECMO survival, ECMO duration, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 2522 patients from 23 trials were included in the study. Biv was associated with a decreased risk of device-related thrombosis (odd ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.84) compared with UFH, whereas NM (OR 2.2, 95% CI: 0.24-65.0) and Arg (OR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.43-2.0) did not reduce the risk of device-related thrombosis compared with UFH. Biv was superior to Arg in decreasing the risk of device-related thrombosis (OR 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03-0.51). Biv reduced the risk of patient-related thrombosis compared with UFH (OR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.18-0.85); NM (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.14-3.3) and Arg (OR 3.1, 95% CI: 0.94-12.0) did not decrease risk of patient-related thrombosis compared with UFH. No significant difference was observed in the risk of major bleeding between three alternatives and UFH: Biv (OR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.23-1.3), Arg (OR 1.3, 95% CI: 0.34-5.8), and NM (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.13-2.6). NM showed a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality compared with UFH (OR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.091-0.77), whereas Arg (OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.15-1.2) and Biv (OR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.52-1.1) did not decrease risk of in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with UFH and Arg, Biv reduces the risk of thrombosis and appears to be a better choice for patients requiring ECMO. NM was associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality.

Update on Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients with ECMO-A Narrative Review

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has recently increased exponentially. ECMO has become the preferred mode of organ support in refractory respiratory or circulatory failure. The fragile balance of haemostasis physiology is massively altered by the patient's critical condition and specifically the aetiology of the underlying disease. Furthermore, an application of ECMO conveys another disturbance of haemostasis due to blood-circuit interaction and the presence of an oxygenator. The purpose of this review is to summarise current knowledge on the anticoagulation management in patients undergoing ECMO therapy. The unfractionated heparin modality with monitoring of activated partial thromboplastin tests is considered to be a gold standard for anticoagulation in this specific subgroup of intensive care patients. However, alternative modalities with other agents are comprehensively discussed. Furthermore, other ways of monitoring can represent the actual state of coagulation in a more complex fashion, such as thromboelastometric/graphic methods, and might become more frequent. In conclusion, the coagulation system of patients with ECMO is altered by multiple variables, and there is a significant lack of evidence in this area. Therefore, a highly individualised approach is the best solution today.

Bivalirudin versus heparin anticoagulation in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

OBJECTIVE

Bivalirudin has been suggested as an alternative to heparin for anticoagulation in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Nevertheless, there is limited evidence about the benefit of bivalirudin in ECMO patients compared with heparin. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effect of bivalirudin versus heparin on clinical outcomes in patients receiving ECMO.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception up to 1 April 2022 for cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing bivalirudin versus heparin in patients who received ECMO. The primary outcome was short-term death. Secondary outcomes included thrombotic events and bleeding events.

RESULTS

We selected 12 retrospective cohort studies with 1232 ECMO patients focusing on bivalirudin anticoagulation (n = 497) versus heparin anticoagulation (n = 735). Two hundred and one of 497 patients (40.4%) in the bivalirudin group versus 350 of 735 patients (47.6%) in the heparin group did not survive to hospital discharge. Compared with the heparin group, bivalirudin anticoagulation did not significantly decrease in-hospital mortality in patients receiving ECMO (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79-1.13; p = 0.546). Fifty-seven of 374 patients (15.2%) in the bivalirudin versus 99 of 381 patients (26.0%) in the heparin group suffered from thrombotic events. Compared with the heparin group, bivalirudin anticoagulation did not significantly decrease the rate of thrombotic events for patients receiving ECMO (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.45-1.35; p = 0.378). However, bivalirudin anticoagulation significantly decreased the incidence of bleeding events compared to the heparin group (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.95; p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with heparin anticoagulation, bivalirudin did not decrease the rates of short-term mortality and thrombotic events, but reduced the incidence of bleeding events in patients receiving ECMO.

Is it time to switch to bivalirudin for ECMO anticoagulation?

For decades, unfractionated heparin (hereafter, heparin) has been the primary anticoagulant used for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. More recently, however, bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has emerged as an alternative. This systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines, aims to summarize 16 comparative studies and 8 meta-analysis and review articles published from January, 2011 till May, 2023 which directly compares ECMO courses using heparin versus bivalirudin as the anticoagulant. While this comparison is complicated by the lack of a standardized definition of major bleeding or thrombosis, our overall findings suggest there is no statistical difference between heparin and bivalirudin in incidence of bleeding and thrombosis. That said, some studies found a statistical significance favoring bivalirudin in reducing major bleeding, thrombosis, and the need for transfusions. We also offer essential guidance for appropriately selecting an anticoagulant and monitoring its effect in ECMO settings.

Superiority of bivalirudin over heparin anticoagulation therapy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? Too early to draw conclusions

Background

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparin as the anticoagulant in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Methods

We conducted a search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for all the studies in which bivalirudin was compared to heparin as the anticoagulant for ECMO. Efficacy outcomes were defined as the time to reach therapeutic levels, time within therapeutic range (TTR), thrombotic events, circuit thrombosis, circuit exchanges. Safety outcomes were reported as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), major bleeding events, minor bleeding events. Other outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, mortality, 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality.

Results

Ten studies with 1091 patients were included for meta-analysis. A significant reduction in thrombotic events [OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.36,0.73, p = 0.0002, I² = 0%], major bleeding events [OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.10,0.92, p = 0.04, I² = 75%] and in-hospital mortality [OR 0.63, 95%CI 0.44,0.89, p = 0.009, I² = 0%] treated with bivalirudin were found compared with heparin. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the time to reach therapeutic levels [MD 3.53, 95%CI -4.02,11.09, p = 0.36, I² = 49%], TTR [MD 8.64, 95%CI -1.72,18.65, p = 0.10, I² = 77%], circuit exchanges [OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.27,3.12, p = 0.90, I² = 38%], HIT [OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.02,2.52, p = 0.24, I² = 0%], minor bleeding events [OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.38,2.29, p = 0.87, I² = 0%], hospital LOS [MD -2.93, 95%CI -9.01,3.15, p = 0.34, I² = 45%], ICU LOS [MD -4.22, 95%CI -10.07,1.62, p = 0.16, I² = 0%], mortality [OR 1.84, 95%CI 0.58,5.85, p = 0.30, I² = 60%] and 30-day mortality [OR 0.75, 95%CI 0.38,1.48, p = 0.41, I² = 0%].

Conclusion

Bivalirudin probably be a potential choice for ECMO anticoagulation. However, based on the included studies' limitation, the superiority of bivalirudin over heparin for anticoagulation in the ECMO population still require further prospective randomized controlled studies before a definite conclusion.

Heparin Versus Bivalirudin for Anticoagulation in Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) poses unique thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks, and the optimal anticoagulant choice is unknown. We systematically searched Ovid EBM Reviews, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection for randomized-, crossover-, retrospective cohort-, or parallel-designed clinical studies of adult patients receiving ECMO that compared heparin recipients with bivalirudin recipients. Meta-analysis was performed with random-effects models. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Six retrospective observational studies met the inclusion criteria for the qualitative summary. Five studies were suitable for meta-analysis. Those who received heparin were more likely to experience circuit-related thrombosis (odds ratio [OR] 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-3.37, p = 0.005, I2 = 0%) and die (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.19-2.21, p = 0.002, I2 = 0%) compared with those who received bivalirudin. There were no differences in major bleeding events between heparin and bivalirudin recipients (OR 1.83, 95% CI 0.55-6.09, p = 0.33, I2 = 82.7%). In retrospective settings compared with heparin anticoagulation, bivalirudin was associated with less circuit-related thrombotic events and greater survival in adults supported on ECMO, without contributing to more bleeding complications. Prospective controlled studies comparing heparin and bivalirudin in adult ECMO patients are warranted to corroborate these findings.

Anticoagulation in adult patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committees on Perioperative and Critical Care Haemostasis and Thrombosis of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Anticoagulation of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is challenging because of a high risk of both bleeding and thrombotic complications, and often empirical. Practice in anticoagulation management is therefore highly variable. The scope of this guidance document is to provide clinicians with practical advice on the choice of an anticoagulant agent, dosing, and the optimal anticoagulant monitoring strategy during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in adult patients.

Current and future strategies to monitor and manage coagulation in ECMO patients

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide life-saving support for critically ill patients suffering severe respiratory and/or cardiac failure. However, thrombosis and bleeding remain common and complex problems to manage. Key causes of thrombosis in ECMO patients include blood contact to pro-thrombotic and non-physiological surfaces, as well as high shearing forces in the pump and membrane oxygenator. On the other hand, adverse effects of anticoagulant, thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction, acquired von Willebrand syndrome, and hyperfibrinolysis are all established as causes of bleeding. Finding safe and effective anticoagulants that balance thrombosis and bleeding risk remains challenging. This review highlights commonly used anticoagulants in ECMO, including their mechanism of action, monitoring methods, strengths and limitations. It further elaborates on existing anticoagulant monitoring strategies, indicating their target range, benefits and drawbacks. Finally, it introduces several highly novel approaches to real-time anticoagulation monitoring methods including sound, optical, fluorescent, and electrical measurement as well as their working principles and future directions for research.

Bivalirudin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

This study evaluated differences in efficacy and safety outcomes with bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with cardiogenic shock requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). We performed a retrospective study at an academic medical center that included patients greater than 18 years of age supported with VA ECMO due to cardiogenic shock from January 2009 to February 2021. The primary endpoint was ECMO-associated thrombotic events normalized to duration of ECMO support. Secondary safety endpoints included major bleeding (per ELSO criteria) and blood product administration. Overall, 143 patients were included in our analysis with 54 having received bivalirudin and 89 having received UFH. Median duration of ECMO support was 92 (interquartile range, 56-172) hours. ECMO-associated thrombotic events per ECMO day were significantly less among those that received bivalirudin ( P < 0.001). In adjusted regression, bivalirudin was independently associated with an increased time to thrombosis when compared with UFH (Exp[B] -3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-8.8; P = 0.002). Patients receiving bivalirudin experienced less major bleeding events ( P = 0.02) with less total red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma administration ( P = 0.04 and P = 0.03, respectively). Bivalirudin is a safe and efficacious alternative to UFH in patients requiring VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock.

Prevalence and Impact of Lupus Anticoagulant in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Monitoring of blood coagulation is essential in ECMO patients. We investigated the prevalence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) and its association with coagulation testing and hemostaseologic complications in patients treated with ECMO.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis including adult patients who received ECMO at a medical intensive care unit at the Medical University of Vienna. The primary outcome was the prevalence of LA. Secondary outcomes included conditions associated with LA positivity, rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events, as well as the proportions of aPTT and antiXa measurements within the target range.

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2021 193 patients received ECMO, in 62 (32%) of whom LA diagnostics were performed. Twenty-two (35%) patients tested positive. LA positive patients had more frequently received VV ECMO (77.3% vs 34.3%; p = 0.002), were more frequently diagnosed with viral respiratory infections (SARS-CoV2: 45.5% vs 20%; p = 0.041, influenza virus: 22.7% vs 0%; p = 0.003), had a longer ECMO treatment duration (25 vs 10 days; p = 0.011) and a longer ICU stay (48 vs 25 days; p = 0.022), but similar rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events.

Use of bivalirudin for anticoagulation in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

This study describes the use of bivalirudin in children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Pediatric patients receiving bivalirudin were compared to patients receiving heparin as the anticoagulant on ECMO. Data was collected for children under 18 years of age supported by ECMO from January 2016 to December 2019. Data collected included demographics, diagnosis, ECMO indication, type, and duration, indication for bivalirudin use, dose range, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) levels, minor and major bleeding, hemolysis, and mortality. Forty pediatric patients received ECMO; eight received bivalirudin primarily for anticoagulation. The median age was 4 months (IQR 0.5, 92) in the heparin cohort, 0.6 months (IQR 0.0, 80.0) in the primary bivalirudin cohort. The indication for ECMO was respiratory in 5 patients (18%) in the heparin group versus 6 (75%) in the primary bivalirudin group, cardiac in 18 (67%) in heparin versus 1 (12.5%) in primary bivalirudin, and extracorporeal-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) in 4 (15%) in heparin versus 1 (12.5%) in primary bivalirudin. Bivalirudin was the initial anticoagulant for eight patients (66.6%) while three (25%) were switched due to concern for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and one (8%) for heparin resistance. The median time to achieve therapeutic aPTT was 14.5 hours compared to 12 hours in the heparin group. Sixty-five percent of aPTT values in the bivalirudin and 44% of values in the heparin group were in the therapeutic range in the first 7 days. Patients with primary bivalirudin use had significantly lower dose requirement at 12 (p = 0.003), 36 (p = 0.007), and 48 (p = 0.0002) hours compared to patients with secondary use of bivalirudin. One patient (12.5%) had major bleeding, and two patients (25%) required circuit change in the primary bivalirudin cohort. Bivalirudin may provide stable and successful anticoagulation in children. Further large, multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Anticoagulation Management during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-A Mini-Review

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been established as a life-saving technique for patients with the most severe forms of respiratory or cardiac failure. It can, however, be associated with severe complications. Anticoagulation therapy is required to prevent ECMO circuit thrombosis. It is, however, associated with an increased risk of hemocoagulation disorders. Thus, safe anticoagulation is a cornerstone of ECMO therapy. The most frequently used anticoagulant is unfractionated heparin, which can, however, cause significant adverse effects. Novel drugs (e.g., argatroban and bivalirudin) may be superior to heparin in the better predictability of their effects, functioning independently of antithrombin, inhibiting thrombin bound to fibrin, and eliminating heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. It is also necessary to keep in mind that hemocoagulation tests are not specific, and their results, used for setting up the dosage, can be biased by many factors. The knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of particular drugs, limitations of particular tests, and individualization are cornerstones of prevention against critical events, such as life-threatening bleeding or acute oxygenator failure followed by life-threatening hypoxemia and hemodynamic deterioration. This paper describes the effects of anticoagulant drugs used in ECMO and their monitoring, highlighting specific conditions and factors that might influence coagulation and anticoagulation measurements.

A Narrative Review of the Impact of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Critical Care Therapies

Objective:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization is increasing on a global scale, and despite technological advances, minimal standardized approaches to pharmacotherapeutic management exist. This objective was to create a comprehensive review for medication dosing in ECMO based on the most current evidence.

Data Sources:

A literature search of PubMed was performed for all pertinent articles prior to 2022. The following search terms were utilized: ECMO, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, sedation, analgesia, antiepileptic, anticoagulation, antimicrobial, antifungal, nutrition. Retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, case series, case reports, and ex vivo investigations were reviewed.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

PubMed (1975 through July 2022) was the database used in the literature search. Non-English studies were excluded. Search terms included both drug class categories, specific drug names, ECMO, and pharmacokinetics.

Data Synthesis:

Medications with high protein binding (>70%) and high lipophilicity (logP > 2) are associated with circuit sequestration and the potential need for dose adjustment. Volume of distribution changes with ECMO may also impact dosing requirements of common critical care medications. Lighter sedation targets and analgosedation may help reduce sedative and analgesia requirements, whereas higher antiepileptic dosing is recommended. Vancomycin is minimally affected by the ECMO circuit and recommendations for dosing in critically ill adults are reasonable. Anticoagulation remains challenging as optimal aPTT goals have not been established.

Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice:

This review describes the anticipated impacts of ECMO circuitry on sedatives, analgesics, anticoagulation, antiepileptics, antimicrobials, antifungals, and nutrition support and provides recommendations for drug therapy management.

Conclusions:

Medication pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters should be considered when determining the potential impact of the ECMO circuit on attainment of therapeutic effect and target serum drug concentrations, and should guide therapy choices and/or dose adjustments when data are not available.

Bivalirudin vs. Enoxaparin in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

(1) Background: In COVID-19 patients, the occurrence of thromboembolic complications contributes to disease progression and mortality. In patients at increased risk for thrombotic complications, therapeutic enoxaparin should be considered. However, critically ill COVID-19 patients could develop resistance to enoxaparin. Bivalirudin, a thrombin inhibitor, may be an alternative. This pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial aims to ascertain if bivalirudin may reduce the time spent under invasive mechanical ventilation, as compared to enoxaparin. (2) Methods: Intubated COVID-19 patients at risk for thrombo-embolic complications were randomized to receive therapeutic doses of enoxaparin or bivalirudin. We ascertained the time spent under invasive mechanical ventilation during the first 28 days from Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. A standardized weaning protocol was implemented in all centers. In addition, we assessed the occurrence of thromboembolic complications, the number of patients requiring percutaneous tracheostomy, the gas exchange, the reintubation rate, the ICU length of stay, the ICU and 28-days mortalities. (3) Results: We enrolled 58 consecutive patients. Bivalirudin did not reduce the time spent under invasive mechanical ventilation as compared to enoxaparin (12 [8; 13] vs. 13 [10; 15] days, respectively; p = 0.078). Thrombotic (p = 0.056) and embolic (p = 0.423) complications, need for tracheostomy (p = 0.423) or reintubation (p = 0.999), the ICU length of stay (p = 0.076) and mortality (p = 0.777) were also similar between treatments. Patients randomized to bivalirudin showed a higher oxygenation at day 7 and 15 after randomization, when compared to enoxaparin group. (4) Conclusions: In intubated COVID-19 patients at increased risk for thromboembolic complications, bivalirudin did not reduce the time spent under invasive mechanical ventilation, nor improved any other clinical outcomes.

Patient Selection for Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Who Benefits the Most?

The evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) enables a complete revascularization of complex coronary lesions. However, simultaneously, patients are presenting nowadays with higher rates of comorbidities, which may lead to a lower physiologic tolerance for complex PCI. To avoid hemodynamic instability during PCI and achieve safe complete revascularization, protected PCI using mechanical circulatory support devices has been developed. However, which patients would benefit from the protected PCI is still in debate. Hence, this review provides practical approaches for the selection of patients by outlining current clinical data assessing utility of protected PCI in high-risk patients.

Thrombus formation during ECMO: Insights from a detailed histological analysis of thrombus composition

OBJECTIVES

Intra-device thrombosis remains one of the most common complications during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Despite anticoagulation, approximately 35% of patients develop thrombi in the membrane oxygenator, pump heads, or tubing. The aim of this study was to describe the molecular and cellular features of ECMO thrombi and to study the main drivers of thrombus formation at different sites in the ECMO circuits.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Thrombi (n = 85) were collected immediately after veno-arterial-(VA)-ECMO circuit removal from 25 patients: 23 thrombi from the pump, 25 from the oxygenator, and 37 from the tubing. Quantitative histological analysis was performed for the amount of red blood cells (RBCs), platelets, fibrin, von Willebrand factor (VWF), leukocytes, and citrullinated histone H3 (H3Cit). ECMO thrombi consist of a heterogenous composition with fibrin and VWF being the major thrombus components. A clustering analysis of the four major histological parameters identified two typical thrombus types: RBC-rich and RBC-poor/fibrin-rich thrombi with no significant differences in VWF and platelet content. Thrombus composition was not associated with the thrombus location, except for higher amounts of H3Cit that were found in pump and oxygenator thrombi compared to tubing samples. We observed higher blood leukocyte count and lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients with fibrin-rich thrombi.

CONCLUSION

We found that thrombus composition is heterogenous, independent of their location, consisting of two types: RBC-rich and a fibrin-rich types. We also found that NETs play a minor role. These findings are important to improve current anticoagulation strategies in ECMO.

Evaluation of clinical outcomes in patients treated with heparin or direct thrombin inhibitors during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The number of patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) devices is increasing. Anticoagulation therapy is crucial to prevent thrombosis during ECMO therapy. Predominantly, heparin has been used as primary anticoagulant but direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) have been established as alternatives. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients treated with heparin compared to different DTI during ECMO.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted. Full scientific articles were sought for inclusion if heparin anticoagulation was compared to DTI (argatroban/bivalirudin) in ECMO patients. Risk of bias was assessed by Newcastle Ottawa scale. Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Bleeding events, thrombotic events, hours of ECMO support, days of hospital stay, percentage of time within therapeutic range and time to therapeutic range were extracted from full texts as secondary endpoints. Results were presented as Forrest-plots. GRADE was used for confidence assessment in outcomes.

RESULTS

Systematic search identified 4.385 records, thereof 18 retrospective studies for a total of 1942 patients, complied with the predefined eligibility criteria:15 studies investigated bivalirudin and 3 studies investigated argatroban versus heparin. Risk of bias was high for most studies. In-hospital mortality, major bleeding events and pump-related thrombosis were less frequent in DTI group as compared to heparin [mortality-OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.86; major bleeding-OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.81; pump thrombosis-OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.40-0.76]. Additionally, percentage of time within therapeutic range was higher for DTI [SMD 0.54, 95% CI 0.14-0.94]. GRADE approach revealed a very low level of certainty for each outcome.

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, DTI and especially bivalirudin showed beneficial effects on clinical outcomes in ECMO patients as compared to heparin. However, due to the lack of randomized trials, certainty of evidence is low.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered at PROSPERO data base (reference number CRD42021237252 ).

The Changing Landscape of Anticoagulation in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Use of the Direct Thrombin Inhibitors

Bleeding and thrombosis frequently occur in pediatric patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. Until now, most patients are anticoagulated with unfractionated heparin (UFH). However, heparin has many disadvantages, such as binding to other plasma proteins and endothelial cells in addition to antithrombin, causing an unpredictable response, challenging monitoring, development of heparin resistance, and risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), such as bivalirudin and argatroban, might be a good alternative. This review will discuss the use of both UFH and DTIs in pediatric patients with ECMO therapy.

Comparison of Bivalirudin Versus Unfractionated Heparin for Anticoagulation in Adult Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) contributes to coagulopathy, necessitating systemic anticoagulation to prevent thrombosis. Traditionally, unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the anticoagulant of choice, however, due to many inadequacies new evidence suggests benefit with the use of direct thrombin inhibitors. This retrospective cohort sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin compared to UFH in ECMO patients. Primary endpoints included incidence of bleeding and thrombosis. Percent time in therapeutic range (TR), time to achieve TR and number of dose titrations required to maintain TR were calculated to assess efficacy of institutional protocols. Overall incidence of thrombosis was low, with one event in the bivalirudin group and no events in the UFH group. No difference was found in rates of bleeding between groups (6% vs . 10%, P = 0.44). Bivalirudin yielded higher percent time in TR (86% vs. 33%, P < 0.001), faster time to TR (2 vs . 18 hr, P < 0.001) and required fewer dose adjustments to maintain TR (2 vs . 11, P < 0.001) compared to UFH. These results suggest bivalirudin and UFH are associated with similar rates of bleeding and thrombosis in patients requiring ECMO support. Our results demonstrate the favorable pharmacokinetic profile of bivalirudin, and its ability to consistently maintain TR when compared to UFH.

Evaluation of anticoagulation with bivalirudin for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

INTRODUCTION

Unfractionated heparin is the most commonly utilized anticoagulant in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) due to clinician familiarity, ease of reversal, and low cost compared to alternative agents. However, heparin's anticoagulant effect can be unpredictable and its use accompanies a risk of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Successful use of bivalirudin as an alternative to heparin in non-HIT ECMO patients has previously been described. However, there is a paucity of data regarding its utilization in patients with confirmed HIT on ECMO.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective chart review at Cleveland Clinic Main Campus included 12 ECMO patients who were managed with bivalirudin for a new diagnosis of HIT. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed utilizing median with interquartile range and number with percent as appropriate.

RESULTS

Of the 12 patients included, median ECMO duration was 328.5 (218.8-502.1) h and venoarterial ECMO was the most common configuration. No patients experienced the primary outcome of in-circuit thrombosis while on bivalirudin. One patient developed a deep vein thrombosis 22.5 h after switching from heparin to bivalirudin. Major bleeding occurred during bivalirudin therapy in 8 (66.7%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our study results suggest that bivalirudin is effective for the management of HIT and did not show evidence of in-circuit thrombosis. A high incidence of major bleeding was observed with bivalirudin use within this study. Clinicians should view bivalirudin as an acceptable agent for the treatment of HIT in the ECMO population, but must consider bleeding risk given the lack of effective reversal agents.

Bivalirudin in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the current literature surrounding the use of bivalirudin as an alternative anticoagulant for pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent single center studies describe that bivalirudin may be associated with decreased blood product transfusion, decreased cost and similar clinical outcomes for pediatric ECMO patients who have failed unfractionated heparin (UFH) anticoagulation. aPTT is the most common test to monitor bivalirudin but has several limitations. Other tests including dilute thrombin time (dTT) and viscoelastic assays are promising but more study is needed. Current evidence suggests that bivalirudin is a well tolerated and effective alternative anticoagulant for pediatric ECMO patients who have failed UFH anticoagulation but prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

SUMMARY

Bivalirudin is a promising alternative anticoagulant for pediatric ECMO patients who have failed UFH. Large prospective, multicenter studies are needed to confirm safety and efficacy.

Hemostasis in Pediatric Extracorporeal Life Support: Overview and Challenges

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ventricular assist devices (VADs) are increasingly used in critically ill children. Despite improvements in mechanical design and clinical management, thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events remain significant causes of morbidity and mortality related to the use of both devices. Choice of anticoagulant agents and assays for monitoring continue to present challenges in management. In this review, we describe the incidence and risk factors for thrombosis and hemorrhage, the different types of anticoagulants currently in use, the assays available for monitoring anticoagulation, and management of thromboembolic and bleeding complications in children on mechanical circulatory support (MCS). We conclude by emphasizing the areas that need further study to minimize the risk for thrombosis and hemorrhage in the use of ECMO and VAD in children.

A Comparison of Anticoagulation Strategies in Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Bleeding remains a major source of morbidity associated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Moreover, there remains significant controversy, and a paucity of data regarding the ideal anticoagulation strategy for VV-ECMO patients. All patients undergoing isolated, peripheral VV-ECMO between January 2009 and December 2014 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients (n = 123) were stratified into one of three sequential eras of anticoagulation strategies: activated clotting time (ACT: 160-180 seconds, n = 53), high-partial thromboplastin time (H-PTT: 60-80 seconds, n = 25), and low-PTT (L-PTT: 45-55 seconds, n = 25) with high-flow (>4 L/min). Pre-ECMO APACHE II scores, SOFA scores, and Murray scores were not significantly different between the groups. Patients in the L-PTT group required less red blood cell units on ECMO than the ACT or H-PTT group (2.1 vs. 1.3 vs. 0.9; p < 0.001) and patients in the H-PTT and L-PTT group required less fresh frozen plasma than the ACT group (0.33 vs. 0 vs. 0; p = 0.006). Overall, major bleeding events were significantly lower in the L-PTT group than in the ACT and H-PTT groups. There was no difference in thrombotic events. In this single-institution experience, a L-PTT, high-flow strategy on VV-ECMO was associated with fewer bleeding and no difference in thrombotic events than an ACT or H-PTT strategy.

The Efficacy and Safety of Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in the Anticoagulation Therapy of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) that can be an alternative to unfractionated heparin (UFH). The efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in anticoagulation therapy in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain unknown.

Methods: This study followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library databases to identify all relevant original studies estimating bivalirudin’s efficacy and safety versus UFH as anticoagulation therapy in ECMO. The time limit for searching is from the search beginning to June 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. The meta-analysis (CRD42020214713) was performed via the RevMan version 5.3.5 Software and STATA version 15.1 Software.

Results: Ten articles with 847 patients were included for the quantitative analysis. Bivalirudin can significantly reduce the incidence of major bleeding in children (I² = 48%, p = 0.01, odd ratio (OR) = 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04–0.66), patient thrombosis (I² = 0%, p = 0.02, OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37–0.93), in-circuit thrombosis/interventions (I² = 0%, p = 0.0005, OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24–0.68), and in-hospital mortality (I² = 0%, p = 0.007, OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46–0.88). Also, comparable clinical outcomes were observed in the incidence of major bleeding in adults (I² = 48%, p = 0.65, OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.46–1.62), 30-day mortality (I² = 0%, p = 0.61, OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.41–1.68), and ECMO duration in adults (I² = 41%, p = 0.75, mean difference (MD) = −3.19, 95% CI: −23.01–16.63) and children (I² = 76%, p = 0.65, MD = 40.33, 95% CI:−135.45–216.12).

Conclusions: Compared with UFH, bivalirudin can be a safe and feasible alternative anticoagulant option to UFH as anticoagulation therapy in ECMO, especially for heparin resistance (HR) and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) cases.

Hemostatic Management in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute cardiac and/or respiratory failure has grown exponentially in the past several decades. Systemic anticoagulation is a fundamental element of caring for ECMO patients. Hemostatic management during ECMO walks a fine line to balance the risk of safe and effective anticoagulant delivery to mitigate thromboembolic complications and minimizing hemorrhagic sequelae. This review discusses the pharmacology, monitoring parameters, and special considerations for anticoagulation in patients requiring ECMO.

Anticoagulation strategies in critically-ill SARS-CoV-2 patients: the role of direct thrombin inhibitors

Objectives

To compare heparin-based anticoagulation and bivalirudin-based anticoagulation within the context of critically ill patients with a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

Design

An observational study.

Setting

At the intensive care unit of a university hospital.

Participants and Interventions

Critically ill patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection receiving full anticoagulation with heparin or bivalirudin.

Measurements and Main Results

Twenty-three patients received full anticoagulation with bivalirudin and 60 with heparin. Despite patients in the bivalirudin group having higher mortality risk scores (SAPS II 60 ± 16 v 39 ±7, p < 0.001) and a higher need for extracorporeal support compared to the heparin group, hospital mortality was comparable (57% v 45, p = 0.3). No difference in thromboembolic complications was observed, and bleeding events were more frequent in patients treated with bivalirudin (65% v 40%, p = 0.01). Similar results were confirmed in the subgroup analysis of patients undergoing intravenous anticoagulation; in addition to comparable thrombotic complications occurrence and thrombocytopenia rate, however, no difference in the bleeding rate was observed (65% v 35%, p = 0.08).

Conclusions

Although heparin is the most used anticoagulant in the intensive care setting, bivalirudin-based anticoagulation was safe and effective in a cohort of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2. Bivalirudin may be given full consideration as an anticoagulation strategy for critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2, especially in those with thrombocytopenia and on extracorporeal support.

2021 ELSO Adult and Pediatric Anticoagulation Guidelines

DISCLAIMER

These guidelines for adult and pediatric anticoagulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are intended for educational use to build the knowledge of physicians and other health professionals in assessing the conditions and managing the treatment of patients undergoing ECLS / ECMO and describe what are believed to be useful and safe practice for extracorporeal life support (ECLS, ECMO) but these are not necessarily consensus recommendations. The aim of clinical guidelines are to help clinicians to make informed decisions about their patients. However, adherence to a guideline does not guarantee a successful outcome. Ultimately, healthcare professionals must make their own treatment decisions about care on a case-by-case basis, after consultation with their patients, using their clinical judgment, knowledge and expertise. These guidelines do not take the place of physicians' and other health professionals' judgment in diagnosing and treatment of particular patients. These guidelines are not intended to and should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment must be made by the physician and other health professionals and the patient in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient, and the known variability and biological behavior of the clinical condition. These guidelines reflect the data at the time the guidelines were prepared; the results of subsequent studies or other information may cause revisions to the recommendations in these guidelines to be prudent to reflect new data, but ELSO is under no obligation to provide updates. In no event will ELSO be liable for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided through these guidelines.

Bivalirudin versus Heparin in Pediatric and Adult Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Meta-analysis

AIMS

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the primary anticoagulant of choice on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, it is debatable whether bivalirudin (BIV), a direct thrombin inhibitor, may be considered a better alternative anticoagulant option.

METHODS

We searched Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov, CNKI, and Wanfang databases up to June 15, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were considered eligible for inclusion. Random-effects meta-analyses, including subgroup analyses, were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies containing 994 patients were enrolled. All articles were retrospective cohort studies. Compared with UFH, BIV was associated with lower risks of major bleeding (risk ratio [RR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.49), ECMO in-circuit thrombosis (RR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.74), stroke (RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.95), in-hospital mortality (RR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.99) and higher rates of survival to ECMO decannulation (RR: 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.34). Pooled risk estimates did not show a significant association with clinical thrombotic events (RR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.45-1.07). Moreover, BIV was associated with a lower risk of ECMO in-circuit thrombosis and in-hospital mortality in the adult subgroup but not in the pediatric subgroup. However, leave-one-out sensitivity analyses indicated that the results of stroke, survival to ECMO decannulation and in-hospital mortality should be interpreted with caution.

CONCLUSIONS

BIV appears to be a potential alternative to UFH in pediatric and adult patients requiring ECMO.

Bivalirudin versus heparin in adult and pediatric patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Our study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus those of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for studies enrolling ECMO patients on bivalirudin and UFH (from inception till July 2021). Meta-analysis was conducted. The I² statistic and p value were used in measuring heterogeneity, and random effects or fixed-effect model was adopted. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for the risk of bias assessment. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were undertaken. We performed Egger's test to evaluate publication bias.

RESULTS

Fourteen eligible retrospective observational studies with 1501 subjects were identified. Compared with UFH, bivalirudin significantly reduced the risk of in-circuit thrombosis (OR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.31-0.61], p = 0.000), thrombosis (OR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.45-0.83], p = 0.002) and hospital mortality (OR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.61-0.99], p = 0.04) and had a positive impact on survival ECMO (OR = 1.50, 95% CI [1.04-2.16], p = 0.032). Decrease in risk of bleeding (OR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.14-0.91], p = 0.031) associated with bivalirudin was observed. Sources of heterogeneity were identified, and sensitivity analysis revealed similar results.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis suggested that bivalirudin was associated with the decreased risk of in-circuit thrombosis, thrombosis, hospital mortality and bleeding in patients on ECMO and improved survival ECMO, indicating the superiority of bivalirudin to UFH in terms of efficacy and safety.

Is bivalirudin an alternative anticoagulant for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation is important for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Heparin is widely used; however, in some cases, it is not suitable for patients. Bivalirudin has been recently proposed for ECMO patients, and there is no evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to systematically review the effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin in ECMO patients.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched to find relevant research on the use of bivalirudin versus heparin for anticoagulation in ECMO patients. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, ECMO duration, major bleeding events, thrombosis events and circuit intervention events. Types of studies included randomized control trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies. Case reports, studies lacking comparison with heparin, and where patients transitioned between heparin and bivalirudin, were excluded. Publication bias was evaluated when the number of included studies was more than ten. Sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the stability of the results.

RESULTS

Ten articles were selected, and nine articles were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed hospital mortality [OR = 0.65, 95%CI (0.44, 0.95), P = 0.03] and thrombosis events decreased (OR = 0.55, 95%CI [0.37, 0.83], P = 0.004) in bivalirudin group compared with heparin in adult patients. Major bleeding events (OR = 0.66, 95%CI [0.17, 2.55], P = 0.55), ECMO duration (MD = 18.92, 95%CI [-29.33, 67.17], P = 0.44) and circuit intervention events (OR = 1.67, 95%CI [0.54, 5.18], P = 0.37) in the bivalirudin group was not statistically significant compared with the heparin group.

CONCLUSION

Bivalirudin may provide survival benefits and reduce thrombosis in adult patients on ECMO compared with heparin. There is no difference in treating major bleeding events between bivalirudin and heparin group. However, because all included studies were retrospective observational studies, the evidence level of this systematic review is low and heterogeneity could not be avoided. More high-quality clinical studies are urgently needed to confirm these benefits.

Eleven Years of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: From H1N1 to SARS-CoV-2. Experience and Perspectives of a National Referral Center

OBJECTIVE

Despite growing expertise and wide application of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of different origin and during pandemics (H1N1 Influenza A virus and SARS-CoV-2), large reports are few and pertain mostly to multicenter registries, and randomized trials are difficult to perform. The aim of this study was to report outcomes, trends, and innovations of VV ECMO treatment over the last 11 years.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Observational study on 142 patients treated at the IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital in Milan from June 2009 (year of the H1N1 pandemic) to May 2020 (SARS-CoV-2 pandemic).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The main causes of ARDS were H1N1 pneumonia in 36% of patients, bacterial pneumonia in 17%, and SARS-CoV-2 in 9%. Seventy-two percent of patients were centralized from remote hospitals, of whom 33% had implanted VV ECMO before transport. The most common cannulation strategy was the dual-lumen catheter cannulation system (55%), and anticoagulation was performed with bivalirudin in most patients (79%). Refractory hypoxia was treated with intravenous beta-blockers (64%), nitric oxide (20%), and pronation (8%). Almost one-third of patients (32%) were extubated while on ECMO. Forty-nine percent of patients were discharged from the intensive care unit, and hospital discharge was 46%; survival was lower in patients requiring VV ECMO for more than three weeks compared with shorter support duration (23% v 56%, p = 0.007). Anticoagulation with bivalirudin was associated with higher survival, compared with heparin (55% v 31%, p = 0.03), and lower thrombocytopenia incidence (69% v 35%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

VV ECMO is the pivotal rescue treatment for refractory ARDS-timely treatment and optimal care are needed to optimize therapy, as duration of support is associated with outcome. Anticoagulation with bivalirudin may improve outcome.

Acute Kidney Injury and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Review on Multiple Organ Support Options

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a temporary life support system used to assist patients with life-threatening severe cardiac and/or respiratory insufficiency. Patients requiring ECMO can be considered the sickest patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Acute kidney injury (AKI) represents a frequent complication during ECMO, affecting up to 70% of patients, with multifactorial pathophysiology and an independent risk factor for mortality. Severe AKI requiring Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) occurs in 20% of ECMO patients, but multiple indications and different timing may imply a significantly higher application rate in different centers. CRRT can be run in parallel to ECMO through different vascular access, or it can be conducted in series by connecting the circuits. Anticoagulation of ECMO is typically managed with systemic heparin, but several approaches can be applied for the CRRT circuit, from no anticoagulation to the addition of intra-filter heparin or regional citrate anticoagulation. The combination of CRRT and ECMO can be considered a form of multiple organ support therapy, but this approach still requires optimization in timing, set-up, anticoagulation, prescription and delivery. The aim of this report is to review the pathophysiology of AKI, the CRRT delivery, anticoagulation strategies and outcomes of patients with AKI treated with ECMO.

Fibrinogen-Albumin-Ratio is an independent predictor of thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing VA-ECMO

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) supports patients suffering from refractory cardiogenic shock. Thromboembolic complications (TeC) are common in VA-ECMO patients and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Valid markers to predict TeC in VA-ECMO patients are lacking. The present study investigated the predictive value of baseline Fibrinogen-Albumin-Ratio (FAR) for in-hospital TeC in patients undergoing VA-ECMO. This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent VA-ECMO therapy due to cardiogenic shock at the University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany between 2011 and 2018. Main exposure was baseline FAR measured at initiation of VA-ECMO therapy. The primary endpoint was the in-hospital incidence of TeC. In total, 344 patients were included into analysis (74.7% male, mean age 59 ± 14 years). The in-hospital incidence of TeC was 34%. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of FAR for in-hospital TeC revealed an area under the curve of 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.74]. Youden index determined a cutoff of 130 for baseline FAR. Multivariate logistic regression revealed an adjusted odds-ratio of 3.72 [95% CI 2.26-6.14] for the association between FAR and TeC. Baseline FAR is independently associated with in-hospital TeC in patients undergoing VA-ECMO. Thus, FAR might contribute to the prediction of TeC in this cohort.

New Trends, Advantages and Disadvantages in Anticoagulation and Coating Methods Used in Extracorporeal Life Support Devices

The use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) devices has significantly increased in the last decades. Despite medical and technological advancements, a main challenge in the ECLS field remains the complex interaction between the human body, blood, and artificial materials. Indeed, blood exposure to artificial surfaces generates an unbalanced activation of the coagulation cascade, leading to hemorrhagic and thrombotic events. Over time, several anticoagulation and coatings methods have been introduced to address this problem. This narrative review summarizes trends, advantages, and disadvantages of anticoagulation and coating methods used in the ECLS field. Evidence was collected through a PubMed search and reference scanning. A group of experts was convened to openly discuss the retrieved references. Clinical practice in ECLS is still based on the large use of unfractionated heparin and, as an alternative in case of contraindications, nafamostat mesilate, bivalirudin, and argatroban. Other anticoagulation methods are under investigation, but none is about to enter the clinical routine. From an engineering point of view, material modifications have focused on commercially available biomimetic and biopassive surfaces and on the development of endothelialized surfaces. Biocompatible and bio-hybrid materials not requiring combined systemic anticoagulation should be the future goal, but intense efforts are still required to fulfill this purpose.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complications in Heparin- and Bivalirudin-Treated Patients

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

OBJECTIVES:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a potentially life-saving intervention in refractory cardiopulmonary failure, but it requires anticoagulation to prevent circuit thromboses, which exposes the patient to hemorrhagic complications. Heparin has traditionally been the anticoagulant of choice, but the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin is routinely used in cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and has been suggested as a superior choice. We sought to examine the timing of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation and to compare the rates of such complications between patients anticoagulated with heparin versus bivalirudin.

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING:

Johns Hopkins Hospital patients between January 2016 and July 2019.

PATIENTS:

Adult (> 18 yr) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients.

INTERVENTIONS:

Patients were anticoagulated either with heparin or bivalirudin.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

We compared rates of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications by time on heparin versus bivalirudin and characterized the average time to each complication. Of 144 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients (mean age 55.3 yr; 58% male), 41% were on central venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, 40% on peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 19% on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Thirteen patients (9%) received bivalirudin during their extracorporeal membrane oxygenation run, due to concern for (n = 8) or diagnosis of (n = 4) heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or for heparin resistance (n = 1). The rate of hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications did not differ between heparin (0.13/d) and bivalirudin (0.06/d; p = 0.633), but patients on bivalirudin received significantly fewer blood transfusions (1.0 U of RBCs/d vs 2.9/d on heparin; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results confirm the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin as an alternative anticoagulant in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and suggest a potential benefit in less blood product transfusion, although prospective studies are needed to evaluate the true effect of bivalirudin versus the disease processes that prompted its use in our study population.

Bivalirudin May Reduce the Need for Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Pediatric Cardiac Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

We retrospectively compared anticoagulation with heparin and bivalirudin for 32 consecutive children under 18 years old during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in our pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU). Between September 2015 and January 2018, 14 patients received heparin, 13 venoarterial (VA), and 1 venovenous (VV). From February 2018 to September 2019, 18 received bivalirudin (all VA). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) percentage of time with therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time and activated clotting time was bivalirudin 54 (14%) and heparin 57 (11%), p = 0.4647, and percentage of time supratherapeutic was bivalirudin 18 (10%) and heparin 27 (12%), p = 0.0238. Phlebotomy-associated blood loss per hour of ECMO was double in the heparin compared with bivalirudin group 1.08 ml/h (0.20 ml/h), compared with 0.51 ml/h (0.07 ml/h), p = 0.0003, as well as interventions to control bleeding. Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions significantly correlated with higher blood loss in the heparin group (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.49, p = 0.0047). Overall amount of blood product utilization was not different between the groups. Survival to ECMO decannulation was 89% for bivalirudin and 57% for heparin, p = 0.0396, although 6 month survival was not significantly different (67% versus 57%, p = 0.5809). Heparin may increase the need for PRBC transfusions and strategies to attenuate bleeding when compared with bivalirudin for children receiving ECMO in PCICU.

A Review of Bivalirudin for Pediatric and Adult Mechanical Circulatory Support

As the use of mechanical circulatory support has increased in volume and complexity, anticoagulation remains an intricate component of a patient’s pharmacotherapy plan. Traditionally, heparin has been the primary anticoagulant utilized because of its ease of titration and  familiarity of use. More recently, bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has attracted attention as a potential alternative to traditional therapy. While labeled for use in percutaneous coronary interventions, it is utilized off-label for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and mechanical circulatory support. A literature search identified ten studies in which bivalirudin was used in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and five studies in which it was used in ventricular assist devices. The purpose of this review was to summarize the currently available literature for bivalirudin use for mechanical circulatory support in both adult and pediatric patients.

Neonatal respiratory and cardiac ECMO in Europe

Neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving procedure for critically ill neonates suffering from a potentially reversible disease, causing severe cardiac and/or respiratory failure and refractory to maximal conventional management. Since the 1970s, technology, management, and clinical applications of neonatal ECMO have changed. Pulmonary diseases still represent the principal neonatal diagnosis, with an overall 74% survival rate, and up to one-third of cases are due to congenital diaphragmatic hernia. The overall survival rate in cardiac ECMO is lower, with congenital heart defect representing the main indication. This review provides an overview of the available evidence in the field of neonatal ECMO. We will address the changing epidemiology, basic principles, technologic advances in circuitry, and monitoring, and deliver a current multidisciplinary management framework, focusing on ECMO applications, complications, and long-term morbidities. Lastly, areas for further research will be highlighted.Conclusions: ECMO is a life support with a potential impact on long-term patients' outcomes. In the next years, advances in knowledge, technology, and expertise may push neonatal ECMO boundaries towards more premature and increasingly complex infants, with the final aim to reduce the burden of ECMO-related complications and improve overall patients' outcomes. What is Known: • ECMO is a life-saving option in newborns with refractory respiratory and/or cardiac failure. • The multidisciplinary ECMO management is challenging and may expose neonates to complications with an impact on long-term outcomes. What is New: • Advances in technology and biomaterials will improve neonatal ECMO management and, eventually, the long-term outcome of these complex patients. • Experimental models of artificial placenta and womb technology are under investigation and may provide clinical translation and future research opportunities.

Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS): A Review and Focus on Considerations for COVID-19

ABSTRACT

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is a support modality for patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who have failed conventional treatments including low tidal volume ventilation, prone positioning, and neuromuscular blockade. In addition, ECLS can be used for hemodynamic support for patients with cardiogenic shock or following cardiac arrest. Injured patients may also require ECLS support for ARDS and other indications. We review the use of ECLS for ARDS patients, trauma patients, cardiogenic shock patients, and post-cardiac arrest patients. We then describe how these principles are applied in the management of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Indications, predictors, procedural considerations, and post-cannulation management strategies are discussed.

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children with acute fulminant myocarditis

Acute fulminant myocarditis (AFM) occurs as an inflammatory response to an initial myocardial insult. Its rapid and deadly progression calls for prompt diagnosis with aggressive treatment measures. The demonstration of its excellent recovery potential has led to increasing use of mechanical circulatory support, especially extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Arrhythmias, organ failure, elevated cardiac biomarkers, and decreased ventricular function at presentation predict requirement for ECMO. In these patients, ECMO should be considered earlier as the clinical course of AFM can be unpredictable and can lead to rapid haemodynamic collapse. Key uncertainties that clinicians face when managing children with AFM such as timing of initiation of ECMO and left ventricular decompression need further investigation.

2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS Expert Consensus on Post-cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support in Adult Patients

Post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (PC-ECLS) in adult patients has been used only rarely but recent data have shown a remarkable increase in its use, almost certainly due to improved technology, ease of management, growing familiarity with its capability and decreased costs. Trends in worldwide in-hospital survival, however, rather than improving, have shown a decline in some experiences, likely due to increased use in more complex, critically ill patients rather than to suboptimal management. Nevertheless, PC-ECLS is proving to be a valuable resource for temporary cardiocirculatory and respiratory support in patients who would otherwise most likely die. Because a comprehensive review of PC-ECLS might be of use for the practitioner, and possibly improve patient management in this setting, the authors have attempted to create a concise, comprehensive and relevant analysis of all aspects related to PC-ECLS, with a particular emphasis on indications, technique, management and avoidance of complications, appraisal of new approaches and ethics, education and training.

Comparison of Bivalirudin Versus Heparin for Maintenance Systemic Anticoagulation During Adult and Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

OBJECTIVES

To provide a comparative analysis of conventional heparin-versus bivalirudin-based systemic anticoagulation in adult and pediatric patients supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review study of adult and pediatric patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation from January 1, 2014, to October 1, 2019.

SETTING

A large, high-volume tertiary referral adult and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center.

PATIENTS

Four hundred twenty-four individuals requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and systemically anticoagulated with either unfractionated heparin (223 adult and 65 pediatric patients) or bivalirudin (110 adult and 24 pediatric patients) were included.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Digital data abstraction was used to retrospectively collect patient details. The majority of both groups were cannulated centrally (67%), and the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation type was predominantly venoarterial (84%). The adult bivalirudin group had a greater occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (12% vs 1%; p < 0.01) and was more likely to require postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (36% vs 55%; p < 0.01). There were no statistical differences between the groups in regards to age, sex, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation location. The main finding was a reduced mortality in the adult bivalirudin group (odds ratio, 0.39; p < 0.01), whereas no difference was noted in the pediatric group. A significant reduction in the composite transfusion requirement in the first 24 hours was noted in the pediatric bivaluridin group with an odds ratio of 0.28 (p = 0.02). Groups did not differ in regard to laboratories per day, anticoagulant dose adjustments, or ischemic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with heparin-based systemic anticoagulation, bivalirudin demonstrated feasibility and safety as established by the absence of increases in identifiable adverse outcomes while manifesting substantial improvements in hospital mortality in adult patients. Further studies are necessary to corroborate these findings and further elucidate the role of bivalirudin during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

Anticoagulation in Critically Ill Adults during Extracorporeal Circulation

Extracorporeal circuits including renal replacement therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and ventricular assist devices are increasingly used in critically ill patients. The need for anticoagulation to provide circuit patency and avoid thrombosis remains a challenging task for treating physicians. In the presence of overall low scientific evidence concerning the optimal anticoagulants, monitoring tests, and therapeutic target ranges, recommendations are largely expert opinions and most centers use individual "in-house" anticoagulation protocols. This review gives a practical view on current concepts of anticoagulation strategies in patients with extracorporeal assist devices.

Antithrombotic Therapy for Stroke Patients with Cardiovascular Disease

Prevention of ischemic stroke relies on the use of antithrombotic medications comprising antiplatelet agents and anticoagulation. Stroke risk is particularly high in patients with cardiovascular disease. This review will focus on the role of antithrombotic therapies in the context of different types of cardiovascular disease. We will discuss oral antiplatelet medications and both IV and parental anticoagulants. Different kinds of cardiovascular disease contribute to stroke via distinct pathophysiological mechanisms, and the optimal treatment for each varies accordingly. We will explore the mechanism of stroke and evidence for antithrombotic therapy in the following conditions: atrial fibrillation, prosthetic heart values (mechanical and bioprosthetic), aortic arch atherosclerosis, congestive heart failure (CHF), endocarditis (infective and nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis), patent foramen ovale (PFO), left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). While robust data exist for antithrombotic use in conditions such as atrial fibrillation, optimal treatment in many situations remains under active investigation.

Impact of CytoSorb on kinetics of vancomycin and bivalirudin in critically ill patients

CytoSorb is a promising tool to treat severe inflammatory status with multiple mechanisms in the acute care setting. Its effect on drugs is, however, poorly documented in vivo, although removal of small molecules might translate into decreased blood levels of life-saving medications. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of CytoSorb on vancomycin and bivalirudin clearance in a large population of critically ill patients. We performed a single-center analysis of CytoSorb treatments performed between January 2018 and March 2019 in critically ill patients admitted to our intensive care unit. A total of 109 CytoSorb treatments were performed in 89 patients. A decrease in lactate dehydrogenase (P = .007), troponin T (P = .022), and creatine phosphokinase (P = .013) was reported during treatment. Vancomycin dose required significant adjustments during treatment (P < .001), but no significant change was necessary after the first 3 days. Similarly, the requirements of bivalirudin significantly changed over days (P < .001), but no dose adjustment was needed after the first 3 days of treatment. No differences in terms of vancomycin and bivalirudin dose need was observed between patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and those who were not (P = .6 and P = .6, respectively), between patients with and without continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (P = .9 and P = .9, respectively), and between CytoSorb responders or not (P = .4 and P = .7, respectively). CytoSorb is effective in mitigating the systemic inflammatory response and safe with respect to vancomycin and bivalirudin administration. These preliminary data further support the use of CytoSorb as adjunct therapy in critically ill patients.

2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS expert consensus on post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support in adult patients

Post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (PC-ECLS) in adult patients has been used only rarely but recent data have shown a remarkable increase in its use, almost certainly due to improved technology, ease of management, growing familiarity with its capability and decreased costs. Trends in worldwide in-hospital survival, however, rather than improving, have shown a decline in some experiences, likely due to increased use in more complex, critically ill patients rather than to suboptimal management. Nevertheless, PC-ECLS is proving to be a valuable resource for temporary cardiocirculatory and respiratory support in patients who would otherwise most likely die. Because a comprehensive review of PC-ECLS might be of use for the practitioner, and possibly improve patient management in this setting, the authors have attempted to create a concise, comprehensive and relevant analysis of all aspects related to PC-ECLS, with a particular emphasis on indications, technique, management, and avoidance of complications, appraisal of new approaches and ethics, education, and training.