Use of Angiotensin II for Vasoplegic Shock in a Combined Heart and Liver Transplant Recipient with Systolic Anterior Motion Physiology

Vasoplegic syndrome during heart transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vasoplegic syndrome (VS) is a common occurrence during heart transplantation (HT). It currently lacks a uniform definition between transplant centers, and its pathophysiology and treatment remain enigmatic. This systematic review summarizes the available published clinical data regarding VS during HT.

METHODS

We searched databases for all published reports on VS during HT. Data collected included the incidence of VS in the HT population, patient and intraoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-two publications were included in this review. The prevalence of VS during HT was 28.72% (95% confidence interval: 27.37%, 30.10%). Factors associated with VS included male sex, higher body mass index, hypothyroidism, pre-HT left ventricular assist device or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), pre-HT calcium channel blocker or amiodarone usage, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, and higher blood product transfusion requirement. Patients who developed VS were more likely to require postoperative VA-ECMO support, renal replacement therapy, reoperation for bleeding, longer mechanical ventilation, and a greater 30-day and 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our systematic review are an initial step for providing clinicians with data that can help identify high-risk patients and avenues for potential risk mitigation. Establishing guidelines that officially define VS will aid in the precise diagnosis of these patients during HT and guide treatment. Future studies of treatment strategies for refractory VS are needed in this high-risk patient population.

Angiotensin ii therapy in refractory septic shock: which patient can benefit most? A narrative review

Patients with septic shock who experience refractory hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation and high-dose noradrenaline have high mortality rates. To improve outcomes, evidence-based guidelines recommend starting a second vasopressor, such as vasopressin, if noradrenaline doses exceed 0.5 µg/kg/min. Recently, promising results have been observed in treating refractory hypotension with angiotensin II, which has been shown to increase mean arterial pressure and has been associated with improved outcomes. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the pathophysiology of the renin-angiotensin system and the role of endogenous angiotensin II in vasodilatory shock with a focus on how angiotensin II treatment impacts clinical outcomes and on identifying the population that may benefit most from its use.

Efficacy and safety of angiotensin II in cardiogenic shock: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In recent times, there is increasing interest in the role of angiotensin II in CS. We sought to systematically review the current literature on the use of angiotensin II in CS.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, PubMed Central, and CINAHL databases were systematically searched for studies that evaluated the efficacy of angiotensin II in patients with CS during 01/01/2010-07/07/2022. Outcomes of interest included change in mean arterial pressure (MAP), vasoactive medication requirements (percent change in norepinephrine equivalent [NEE] dose), all-cause mortality, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the total 2,402 search results, 15 studies comprising 195 patients were included of which 156 (80%) received angiotensin II. Eleven patients (84.6%) in case reports and case series with reported MAP data at hour 12 noted an increase in MAP. Two studies noted a positive hemodynamic response (defined a priori) in eight (88.9%) and five (35.7%) patients. Eight studies reported a reduction in NEE dose at hour 12 after angiotensin II administration and one study noted a 100% reduction in NEE dose. Out of 47 patients with documented information, 13 patients had adverse outcomes which included hepatic injury (2), digital ischemia (1), ischemic optic neuropathy (1), ischemic colitis (2), agitated delirium (1), and thrombotic events (2).

CONCLUSIONS

In this first systematic review of angiotensin II in CS, we note the early clinical experience. Angiotensin II was associated with improvements in MAP, decrease in vasopressor requirements, and minimal reported adverse events.

Vasoplegic syndrome in patients undergoing heart transplantation

Objectives

To summarize the risk factors, onset time, and treatment of vasoplegic syndrome in patients undergoing heart transplantation.

Methods

The PubMed, OVID, CNKI, VIP, and WANFANG databases were searched using the terms "vasoplegic syndrome," "vasoplegia," "vasodilatory shock," and "heart transplant*," to identify eligible studies. Data on patient characteristics, vasoplegic syndrome manifestation, perioperative management, and clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed.

Results

Nine studies enrolling 12 patients (aged from 7 to 69 years) were included. Nine (75%) patients had nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and three (25%) patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy. The onset time of vasoplegic syndrome varied from intraoperatively to 2 weeks postoperatively. Nine (75%) patients developed various complications. All patients were insensitive to vasoactive agents.

Conclusions

Vasoplegic syndrome can occur at any time during the perioperative period of heart tranplantation, especially after the discontinuation of bypass. Methylene blue, angiotensin II, ascorbic acid, and hydroxocobalamin have been used to treat refractory vasoplegic syndrome.

The pharmacotherapeutic options in patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock

INTRODUCTION

Septic and vasoplegic shock are common types of vasodilatory shock (VS) with high mortality. After fluid resuscitation and the use of catecholamine-mediated vasopressors (CMV), vasopressin, angiotensin II, methylene blue (MB) and hydroxocobalamin can be added to maintain blood pressure.

AREAS COVERED

VS treatment utilizes a phased approach with secondary vasopressors added to vasopressor agents to maintain an acceptable mean arterial pressure (MAP). This review covers additional vasopressors and adjunctive therapies used when fluid and catecholamine-mediated vasopressors fail to maintain target MAP.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence supporting additional vasopressor agents in catecholamine resistant VS is limited to case reports, series, and a few randomized control trials (RCTs) to guide recommendations. Vasopressin is the most common agent added next when MAPs are not adequately supported with CMV. VS patients failing fluids and vasopressors with cardiomyopathy may have cardiotonic agents such as dobutamine or milrinone added before or after vasopressin. Angiotensin II, another class of vasopressor is used in VS to maintain adequate MAP. MB and/or hydoxocobalamin, vitamin C, thiamine and corticosteroids are adjunctive therapies used in refractory VS. More RCTs are needed to confirm the utility of these drugs, at what doses, which combinations and in what order they should be given.

Use of Angiotensin II in Severe Vasoplegia After Left Pneumonectomy Requiring Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Renin Response Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Describe a case of post-pneumonectomy vasoplegia managed with angiotensin II. Plasma renin activity was measured at specific time intervals to describe the relationship between endogenous renin activity and exogenous angiotensin II supplementation.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

Spectrum Health Cardiothoracic Critical Care Unit.

PATIENTS

Fifty-seven-year-old male.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Plasma renin activity at five pre-determined time points. Angiotensin II caused a significant increase in mean arterial pressure and a rapid reduction in catecholamine vasopressor doses from 0.75 to 0.31 mcg/kg/min norepinephrine equivalents. Plasma renin activity drawn immediately before angiotensin II initiation was 40 ng/mL/hr (normal, 0.6-3.0 ng/mL/hr) with resultant drop to 22 and 12 ng/mL/hr at 2 and 6 hours after angiotensin II initiation, respectively. The patient suffered no end-organ damage and achieved a positive outcome, discharging home on postoperative day 11.

CONCLUSION

Exogenous angiotensin II reduced catecholamine vasopressor doses and had an apparent effect in reducing endogenous renin production in this case. Prospective research is warranted to determine the utility of angiotensin II and to better understand it effects on the dysfunctional renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system during vasoplegic shock.

Intraoperative Use of Angiotensin II for Severe Vasodilatory Shock During Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

Refractory hypotension is a known entity in liver transplantation. Catecholamine and vasopressin infusions are first-line therapies. There has been recent interest in angiotensin II (Ang-2) as an alternative vasopressor; however, liver failure patients were excluded from the original trials. Ang-2 has potential in this patient population. This case discusses a patient who received an infusion of Ang-2 during a liver transplant for combined liver failure-induced distributive shock and septic shock. It is the first known successful use of intraoperative Ang-2 in this situation, and it shows that Ang-2 may be safe in liver transplantation when traditional therapies fail.

The Use of Angiotensin II for the Treatment of Post-cardiopulmonary Bypass Vasoplegia

Purpose

Vasoplegia is a common complication after cardiac surgery and is related to the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Despite its association with increased morbidity and mortality, no consensus exists in terms of its treatment. In December 2017, angiotensin II (AII) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in vasodilatory shock; however, except for the ATHOS-3 trial, its use in vasoplegic patients that underwent cardiac surgery on CPB has mainly been reported in case reports. Thus, the aim of this review is to collect all the clinically relevant data and describe the pharmacologic mechanism, efficacy, and safety of this novel pharmacologic agent for the treatment of refractory vasoplegia in this population.

Methods

Two independent reviewers performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library using relevant MeSH terms (Angiotensin II, Vasoplegia, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Cardiac Surgical Procedures).

Results

The literature search yielded 820 unique articles. In total, 9 studies were included. Of those, 2 were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 6 were case reports and 1 was a retrospective cohort study.

Conclusions

AII appears to be a promising means of treatment for patients with post-operative vasoplegia. It is demonstrated to be effective in raising blood pressure, while no major adverse events have been reported. It remains uncertain whether this agent will be broadly available and whether it will be more advantageous in the clinical management of vasoplegia compared to other available vasopressors. For that reason, we should contain our eagerness and enthusiasm regarding its use until supplementary knowledge becomes available.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10557-020-07098-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Angiotensin II Infusion for Shock: A Multicenter Study of Postmarketing Use

BACKGROUND

Vasodilatory shock refractory to catecholamine vasopressors and arginine vasopressin is highly morbid and responsible for significant mortality. Synthetic angiotensin II is a potent vasoconstrictor that may be suitable for use in these patients.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the safety and effectiveness of angiotensin II and what variables are associated with a favorable hemodynamic response?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a multicenter, retrospective study at five tertiary medical centers in the United States. The primary end point of hemodynamic responsiveness to angiotensin II was defined as attainment of mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥ 65 mm Hg with a stable or reduced total vasopressor dosage 3 h after drug initiation.

RESULTS

Of 270 included patients, 181 (67%) demonstrated hemodynamic responsiveness to angiotensin II. Responders showed a greater increase in MAP (+10.3 mm Hg vs +1.6 mm Hg, P < .001) and reduction in vasopressor dosage (-0.20 μg/kg/min vs +0.04 μg/kg/min; P < .001) compared with nonresponders at 3 h. Variables associated with favorable hemodynamic response included lower lactate concentration (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.17, P < .001) and receipt of vasopressin (OR, 6.05; 95% CI, 1.98-18.6; P = .002). In severity-adjusted multivariate analysis, hemodynamic responsiveness to angiotensin II was associated with reduced likelihood of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.71; P < .001). Arrhythmias occurred in 28 patients (10%) and VTE was identified in 4 patients.

INTERPRETATION

In postmarketing use for vasopressor-refractory shock, 67% of angiotensin II recipients demonstrated a favorable hemodynamic response. Patients with lower lactate concentrations and those receiving vasopressin were more likely to respond to angiotensin II. Patients who responded to angiotensin II experienced reduced mortality.

Treatment With Angiotensin II Is Associated With Rapid Blood Pressure Response and Vasopressor Sparing in Patients With Vasoplegia After Cardiac Surgery: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock (ATHOS-3) Study

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated outcomes in patients with vasoplegia after cardiac surgery treated with angiotensin II plus standard-of-care vasopressors. Vasoplegia is a common complication in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Approximately 250,000 cardiac surgeries with cardiopulmonary bypass are performed in the United States annually, with vasoplegia occurring in 20%to-27% of patients.

DESIGN

Post-hoc analysis of the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock (ATHOS-3) study.

SETTING

Multicenter, multinational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixteen patients with vasoplegia after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

Angiotensin II plus standard-of-care vasopressors (n = 9) compared with placebo plus standard-of-care vasopressors (n = 7).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary endpoint was mean arterial pressure response (mean arterial pressure ≥75 mmHg or an increase from baseline of ≥10 mmHg at hour 3 without an increase in the dose of standard-of-care vasopressors). Vasopressor sparing and safety also were assessed. Mean arterial pressure response was achieved in 8 (88.9%) patients in the angiotensin II group compared with 0 (0%) patients in the placebo group (p = 0.0021). At hour 12, the median standard-of-care vasopressor dose had decreased from baseline by 76.5% in the angiotensin II group compared with an increase of 7.8% in the placebo group (p = 0.0013). No venous or arterial thrombotic events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Patients with vasoplegia after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass rapidly responded to angiotensin II, permitting significant vasopressor sparing.

Angiotensin II for Critically Ill Patients With Shock After Heart Transplant

Patients undergoing heart transplant are at high risk for vasodilatory shock in the postoperative period, due to a combination of vascular dysfunction from end-stage heart failure and inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass and, increasingly, long-term exposure to nonpulsatile blood flow in those who have received a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant. Patients who have this vasoplegic syndrome, which may be refractory to traditional agents used in the treatment of shock, are vulnerable to organ dysfunction and death. Angiotensin II (ANG-2) is of increasing interest as an adjunct to traditional therapy, both for improvement in blood pressure and for sparing the use of high-dose catecholamine vasopressors. This case series describes the use of ANG-2 in 4 clinical scenarios for the treatment of shock due to heart transplant surgery, supporting its use in this role and justifying further prospective studies to clarify the appropriate place for ANG-2 in the hierarchy of adjunctive therapies.

Roles of angiotensin II as vasopressor in vasodilatory shock

Shock is an acute condition of circulatory failure resulting in life-threatening organ dysfunction, high morbidity and high mortality. Current management includes fluid and catecholamine therapy to maintain adequate mean arterial pressure and organ perfusion. Norepinephrine is recommended as first-line vasopressor, but other agents are available. Angiotensin II is an alternative potent vasoconstrictor without chronotropic or inotropic properties. Several studies, including a large randomized controlled trial have demonstrated its ability to increase blood pressure with catecholamine-sparing effects. Angiotensin II was consequently approved by the US FDA in 2017 and the EU in 2019 as an add-on vasopressor in vasodilatory shock. This review aims to discuss its basic pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety and future perspectives.

Angiotensin II: A New Vasopressor for the Treatment of Distributive Shock

PURPOSE

Angiotensin II (ATII) is a potent endogenous vasoconstrictor that has recently garnered regulatory approval for the treatment of distributive shock, including septic shock. Traditional vasoactive substances used in the management of distributive shock include norepinephrine, epinephrine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin. However, their use can be associated with deleterious adverse drug effects, such as splanchnic vasoconstriction and associated hypoperfusion. The purpose of this review is to describe ATII, including its pharmacologic mechanisms, pharmacokinetic profile, evidence of efficacy and tolerability, and potential role in contemporary critical care practice.

METHODS

Peer-reviewed clinical trials and relevant treatment guidelines published from 1966 to September 14, 2019, were identified from Medline/PubMed using the following search terms: angiotensin II OR angiotensin 2 AND shock OR septic shock OR vasodilatory shock. Pertinent review articles were reviewed for additional studies for inclusion and discussion. The final decision on the inclusion of studies in the current review was based on the expert opinion of the authors.

FINDINGS

On the basis of the available evidence, ATII is effective at elevating blood pressure in patients with distributive shock and appears to reduce the dose of concurrent vasopressors to maintain adequate blood pressure. ATII has been investigated for other causes of shock; however, robust evidence of off-label indications is lacking and is much needed. Clinical and cost benefits compared with traditional vasopressors have yet to be established.

IMPLICATIONS

ATII represents a welcome addition to the armamentarium of critical care clinicians. Enthusiasm for the use of ATII should be balanced with the current gaps in our understanding of ATII in patients with shock. Until further evidence provides more clinically meaningful benefits, as well as cost-effectiveness compared with currently available vasopressors, critical care clinicians should reserve ATII for salvage therapy in patients with septic shock.