Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Anesthesia for Elective Thoracic Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Consensus Statement From the Israeli Society of Anesthesiologists

Effect of comfort nursing on postoperative recovery and life quality of patients undergoing thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of comfort nursing on postoperative recovery and life quality of patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

METHODS

A total of 400 patients undergoing thoracic surgery in our hospital from October 2017 to July 2020 were identified as research subjects and retrospectively studied. These patients were assigned to a control group (Con group, n=196, given conventional nursing) and an observation group (Obs group, n=204, given conventional nursing combined with comfort nursing) according to nursing modality. The following items of the two groups were compared: incidence of adverse reactions after surgery, MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) score, visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery, length of stay, first postoperative exhaust time, drainage duration, nursing satisfaction, and systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean atrial pressure (MAP), and heart rate before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

Compared with the Con group, the Obs group showed a notably lower total incidence of adverse reactions and had higher SF-36 scores after surgery. The Obs group had lower VAS scores at 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery than the Con group. The Obs group also experienced significantly shorter length of stay and drainage duration and earlier first postoperative exhaust time in contrast to the Con group. In addition, the Obs group obtained a higher satisfaction rate than the Con group, and patients in the Obs group had better treatment compliance and emotionalal status than those in the Con group. Moreover, the two groups presented no significant difference in SBP, DBP, MAP, or heart rate before and after intervention (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing thoracic surgery, comfort nursing can greatly improve their life quality and contribute to their postoperative recovery.

Use of Electronic Auscultation in Full Personal Protective Equipment to Detect Ventilation Status in Selective Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Chest auscultation is the first procedure performed to detect endotracheal tube malpositioning but conventional stethoscopes do not conform to the personal protective equipment (PPE) protocol during the COVID-19 pandemic. This double-blinded randomized controlled trial evaluated the feasibility of using ear-contactless electronic stethoscope to identify endobronchial blocker established selective lung ventilation, simulating endobronchial intubation during thoracic surgery with full PPE. Conventional and electronic auscultation was performed without and with full PPE, respectively, of 50 patients with selective lung ventilation. The rates of correct ventilation status detection were 86 and 88% in the conventional and electronic auscultation groups (p = 1.00). Electronic auscultation revealed a positive predictive value of 87% (95% CI 77 to 93%), and a negative predictive value of 91% (95% CI 58 to 99%), comparable to the results for conventional auscultation. For detection of the true unilateral lung ventilation, the F1 score and the phi were 0.904 and 0.654, respectively for conventional auscultation; were 0.919 and 0.706, respectively for electronic auscultation. Furthermore, the user experience questionnaire revealed that the majority of participant anesthesiologists (90.5%) rated the audio quality of electronic lung sounds as comparable or superior to that of conventional acoustic lung sounds. In conclusion, electronic auscultation assessments of ventilation status as examined during thoracic surgery in full PPE were comparable in accuracy to corresponding conventional auscultation assessments made without PPE. Users reported satisfactory experience with the electronic stethoscope.

Major Pulmonary Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Single Israeli Center Cross-Sectional Study

Background: The highly contagious COVID-19 has created unprecedented challenges in providing care to patients with resectable non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Surgical management now needs to consider the risks of malignant disease progression by delaying surgery, and those of COVID-19 transmission to patients and operating room staff. The goal of our study was to describe our experience in providing both emergent and elective surgical procedures for patients with NSCLC during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel, and to present our point of view regarding the safety of performing lung cancer surgery. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study included all consecutive patients with NSCLC who operated at Tel Aviv Medical Center, a large university-affiliated hospital, from February 2020 through December 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel. The patients’ demographics, COVID-19 preoperative screening results, type and side of surgery, pathology results, morbidity and mortality rates, postoperative complications, including pulmonary complications management, and hospital stay were evaluated. Results: Included in the study were 113 patients, 68 males (60.2%) and 45 females (39.8%), with a median age of 68.2 years (range, 41–89). Of these 113 patients, 83 (73.5%) underwent video-assisted thoracic surgeries (VATS), and 30 (26.5%) underwent thoracotomies. Fifty-five patients (48.7%) were preoperatively screened for COVID-19 and received negative results. Fifty-six postoperative complications were reported in 35 patients (30.9%). A prolonged air leak was detected in 11 patients (9.7%), atrial fibrillation in 11 patients (9.7%), empyema in 5 patients (4.4%), pneumonia in 9 patients (7.9%) and lobar atelectasis in 7 patients (6.2%). Three patients (2.7%) with postoperative pulmonary complications required mechanical ventilation, and two of them (1.6%) underwent tracheostomy. Two patients (1.6%) were postoperatively diagnosed as positive for COVID-19. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of implementing precautionary strategies to ensure the safety of lung cancer patients undergoing pulmonary resection during the COVID-19 pandemic. The strategy was equally effective in protecting the surgical staff and healthcare providers, and we recommend performing lung cancer surgery during the pandemic era.

Anesthetic Management for Thoracic Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Purpose of Review

This review explores recent international guidance on the anesthetic management of patients undergoing thoracic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: those with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 requiring urgent thoracic surgery and those presenting for elective procedures.

Recent Findings

A significant mortality risk is associated with patients with COVID-19 undergoing thoracic surgery; therefore, where possible, it should be avoided. Thoracic surgery also carries a significant risk of viral transmission to healthcare workers due to the necessarily high frequency of intraoperative aerosol-generating procedures involved, such as lung isolation, one-lung ventilation, and flexible bronchoscopy.

Summary

Guidelines recommend appropriate personal protective equipment and numerous procedural modifications to prevent viral transmission to staff and other patients. With appropriate disease mitigation strategies in place, elective thoracic surgery, in particular for lung cancer, has been able to continue safely in many centres.

EACTA/SCA Recommendations for the Cardiac Anesthesia Management of Patients With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19 Infection: An Expert Consensus From the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists With Endorsement From the Chinese Society of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesiology

The European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA) and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) aimed to create joint recommendations for the perioperative management of patients with suspected or proven severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection undergoing cardiac surgery or invasive cardiac procedures.

To produce appropriate recommendations, the authors combined the evidence from the literature review, reevaluating the clinical experience of routine cardiac surgery in similar cases during the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) outbreak and the current pandemic with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, and the expert opinions through broad discussions within the EACTA and SCA. The authors took into consideration the balance between established procedures and the feasibility during the present outbreak. The authors present an agreement between the European and US practices in managing patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The recommendations take into consideration a broad spectrum of issues, with a focus on preoperative testing, safety concerns, overall approaches to general and specific aspects of preparation for anesthesia, airway management, transesophageal echocardiography, perioperative ventilation, coagulation, hemodynamic control, and postoperative care.

As the COVID-19 pandemic is spreading, it will continue to present a challenge for the worldwide anesthesiology community. To allow these recommendations to be updated as long as possible, the authors provided weblinks to international public and academic sources providing timely updated data.

This document should be the basis of future task forces to develop a more comprehensive consensus considering new evidence uncovered during the COVID-19 pandemic.