Diaphragm Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery: Reappraisal

Ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic dysfunction in non-critically ill patients: relevant indicators and update

Diaphragm dysfunction (DD) can be classified as mild, resulting in diaphragmatic weakness, or severe, resulting in diaphragmatic paralysis. Various factors such as prolonged mechanical ventilation, surgical trauma, and inflammation can cause diaphragmatic injury, leading to negative outcomes for patients, including extended bed rest and increased risk of pulmonary complications. Therefore, it is crucial to protect and monitor diaphragmatic function. Impaired diaphragmatic function directly impacts ventilation, as the diaphragm is the primary muscle involved in inhalation. Even unilateral DD can cause ventilation abnormalities, which in turn lead to impaired gas exchange, this makes weaning from mechanical ventilation challenging and contributes to a higher incidence of ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction and prolonged ICU stays. However, there is insufficient research on DD in non-ICU patients, and DD can occur in all phases of the perioperative period. Furthermore, the current literature lacks standardized ultrasound indicators and diagnostic criteria for assessing diaphragmatic dysfunction. As a result, the full potential of diaphragmatic ultrasound parameters in quickly and accurately assessing diaphragmatic function and guiding diagnostic and therapeutic decisions has not been realized.

Interest of thoracic ultrasound after cardiac surgery or interventional cardiology

Thoracic ultrasound has attracted much interest in detecting pleural effusion or pulmonary consolidation after cardiac surgery. In 2016, Trovato reported, in the World Journal of Cardiology, the interest of using, in addition to echocardiography, thoracic ultrasound. In this editorial, we highlight the value of assessing diaphragm function after cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology procedures. Various factors are able to impair diaphragm function after such interventions. Diaphragm motion may be decreased by chest pain secondary to sternotomy, pleural effusion or impaired muscle function. Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis may be secondary to phrenic nerve damage complicating cardiac surgery or atrial fibrillation ablation. Diagnosis may be delayed. Indeed, respiratory troubles induced by diaphragm dysfunction are frequently attributed to pre-existing heart disease or pulmonary complications secondary to surgery. In addition, elevated hemidiaphragm secondary to diaphragm dysfunction is sometimes not observed on chest X-ray performed in supine position in the intensive care unit. Analysis of diaphragm function by ultrasound during the recovery period appears essential. Both hemidiaphragms can be studied by two complementary ultrasound methods. The mobility of each hemidiaphragms is measured by M-mode ultrasonography. In addition, recording the percentage of inspiratory thickening provides important information about the quality of muscle function. These two approaches make it possible to detect hemidiaphragm paralysis or dysfunction. Such a diagnosis is important because persistent diaphragm dysfunction after cardiac surgery has been shown to be associated with adverse respiratory outcome. Early respiratory physiotherapy is able to improve respiratory function through strengthening of the inspiratory muscles i.e. diaphragm and accessory inspiratory muscles.

Perioperative Diaphragm Dysfunction

Diaphragm Dysfunction (DD) is a respiratory disorder with multiple causes. Although both unilateral and bilateral DD could ultimately lead to respiratory failure, the former is more common. Increasing research has recently delved into perioperative diaphragm protection. It has been established that DD promotes atelectasis development by affecting lung and chest wall mechanics. Diaphragm function must be specifically assessed for clinicians to optimally select an anesthetic approach, prepare for adequate monitoring, and implement the perioperative plan. Recent technological advancements, including dynamic MRI, ultrasound, and esophageal manometry, have critically aided disease diagnosis and management. In this context, it is noteworthy that therapeutic approaches for DD vary depending on its etiology and include various interventions, either noninvasive or invasive, aimed at promoting diaphragm recruitment. This review aims to unravel alternative anesthetic and operative strategies that minimize postoperative dysfunction by elucidating the identification of patients at a higher risk of DD and procedures that could cause postoperative DD, facilitating the recognition and avoidance of anesthetic and surgical interventions likely to impair diaphragmatic function.

Imaging of the Diaphragm Following Cardiac Surgery: Focus on Ultrasonographic Assessment

Diaphragm dysfunction is a common complication following cardiac surgery. Its clinical impact is variable, ranging from the absence of symptoms to the acute respiratory failure. Post-operative diaphragm dysfunction may negatively affect patients' prognosis delaying the weaning from the mechanical ventilation (MV), extending the time of hospitalization and increasing mortality. Ultrasonography is a valid tool to evaluate diaphragmatic impairment in different settings, like the Intensive Care Unit, to predict successful weaning from the MV, and the Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, to stratify patients in terms of risk of functional recovery failure. The aim of this review is to describe the pathophysiology of post-cardiac surgery diaphragm dysfunction, the techniques used for its diagnosis and the potential applications of diaphragm ultrasound.

Efficacy of maintaining low-tidal volume mechanical ventilation as compared to resting lung strategy during coronary artery bypass graft cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: A post-hoc analysis of the MECANO trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare a low-tidal-volume with positive end-expiratory pressure strategy (VENT strategy) to a resting-lung-strategy (i.e., no-ventilation (noV) strategy) during cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass graft surgery on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications.

DESIGN

Post-hoc analysis of the MECANO trial which was a prospective single-center, blind, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary care cardiac surgery center.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent isolated on-pump coronary bypass surgery were randomized either to VENT or noV group.

INTERVENTION

During the cardiopulmonary bypass phase of the cardiac surgery procedure, mechanical ventilation in the VENT group consisted of a tidal volume of 3 mL/kg, a respiratory rate of 5 per minute and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH₂O. Patients in the noV group received no ventilation during this phase.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary composite outcome combining death, early respiratory failure, ventilation support beyond day 2 and reintubation.

MAIN RESULTS

In this post-hoc analysis, we retained 725 patients who underwent isolated CABG surgery, from the 1501 patients included in the original study. There were 352 in the VENT group and 373 patients in the noV group. Post-hoc comparison yielded no differences in baseline characteristics between these two groups. The primary outcome occurred less frequently in the VENT group than in the noV group, with 44 (12.5%) and 76 (20.4%) respectively (odds-ratio (OR) = 0.56 (0.37-0.84), p = 0.004). There were fewer early respiratory dysfunctions and prolonged respiratory support in the VENT group (respectively, OR = 0.34 (0.12-0.96) p = 0.033 and OR = 0.51 (0.27-0.94) p = 0.029). Complications related to mechanical ventilation were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this post-hoc analysis, maintaining low-tidal ventilation compared to a resting-lung strategy was associated with fewer pulmonary postoperative complications in patients who underwent isolated CABG procedures.

Persistent diaphragm dysfunction after cardiac surgery is associated with adverse respiratory outcomes: a prospective observational ultrasound study

BACKGROUND

Transient diaphragm dysfunction is common during the first week after cardiac surgery; however, the precise incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of persistent diaphragm dysfunction are not well described.

METHODS

In a single-centre prospective cohort study, we included all consecutive patients over 18 yr who underwent elective cardiac surgery. Diaphragm function was evaluated with ultrasound (M-mode) by recording the excursion of both hemidiaphragms at two different time points: preoperatively and after the seventh postoperative day in patients breathing without assistance. Significant diaphragm dysfunction after the seventh day of the index cardiac surgery was defined as a decrease in diaphragm excursion below the lower limit of normal: at rest, < 9 mm for women and < 10 mm for men; after a sniff test, < 16 mm for women and < 18 mm for men.

RESULTS

Overall, 122 patients were included in the analysis. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] age was 69 [59-74] years and 96/122 (79%) were men. Ten (8%) patients had diaphragm dysfunction after the seventh postoperative day. We did not identify risk factors for persistent diaphragm dysfunction. Persistent diaphragm dysfunction was associated with a longer median [IQR] duration of noninvasive (8 [0-34] vs 0 [0-0] hr; difference in medians, 8 hr; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0 to 22; P < 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (5 [3-257] vs 3[2-4] hr; difference in medians, 2 hr; 95% CI, 0.5 to 41; P = 0.008); a higher reintubation rate (4/10, 40% vs 1/112, 0.9%; relative risk, 45; 95% CI, 7.1 to 278; P < 0.0001), a higher incidence of pneumonia (4/10 [40%] vs 7/112 [6%]; relative risk, 6; 95% CI, 2 to 16; P < 0.001), and longer median [IQR] length of stay in the intensive care unit (8 [5-29] vs 4 [2-6] days; difference in medians, 4 days; 95% CI, 2 to 12; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of persistent diaphragm dysfunction was 8% in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery and was associated with adverse respiratory outcomes.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04276844); prospectively registered 19 February 2020.

Risk factors and complications associated with intra-operative or post-operative identification of a PFO in cardiac surgery patients: A cohort study

Introduction

It is unknown whether patent foramen ovale (PFO) reopening in the peri-operative setting of cardiac surgery affects the risk for stroke and post-operative outcomes.

Methods

We performed a single-center, retrospective study based on a prospectively collected database in a tertiary cardiac surgery center. Using logistic regression, we assessed risk factors of PFO finding around surgery and subsequent clinical complications.

Results

Between January 2007 and July 2019, 11034 patients who underwent cardiac surgery in our center were included. A total of 233 patients (2.1%) presented a finding of PFO including 138 per-operative disclosures and 95 post-operative finding for hypoxemia. In the whole cohort, the mean age was 68.4 ± 11.5 years including 73.9% of men. Post-operative PFO finding was associated with more ischemic strokes compared with per-operative finding and control group [7(7.4%) vs. 3(2.2%) vs. 236(2.2), respectively; p = 0.003]. Moreover, patients with post-operative PFO reopening experienced a higher rate of pneumonia, reintubation, and longer length of stay in the ICU. Post-operative reopening of PFO, but not per-operative finding, was independently associated with ischemic strokes {adjusted odds-ratio = 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.6-7.8]; p = 0.002}. Other variables associated with stroke incidence included age, mitral valve surgery, and ascending aorta surgery. Per- or post-operative PFO closure was associated with reduced adverse respiratory outcomes and a trend of the lower cerebral ischemic event.

Conclusion

Patent foramen ovale finding incidence in peri-operative cardiac surgery care was rare (2%) but post-operative finding of PFO was associated with a increased risk of ischemic strokes, worsened respiratory outcomes, and prolonged hospitalization.

Diaphragm Dysfunction after Cardiac Surgery: Insights from Ultrasound Imaging during Cardiac Rehabilitation

Diaphragm dysfunction is common after cardiac surgery and can be evaluated with ultrasonography (US). We aimed at assessing with US the incidence of diaphragmatic dysfunction and the impact of cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR) on its recovery. A single-center cohort study was performed. Patients were enrolled after cardiac surgery. The 6-min walking test (6MWT) and diaphragm US were performed at CR admission and after 10 rehabilitative sessions. One hundred eighty-five patients were eligible for final analysis. One hundred thirty-one patients (70.8%) were found to have diaphragm dysfunction (excursion <2 cm). After CR, 68 patients regained normal diaphragmatic function; those with persistent dysfunction had a lower level of functional performance on the 6MWT (metabolic equivalents of tasks: 3.3 vs. 3.6, p = 0.013). The patients who underwent combined surgery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.09, p = 0.001) and those with post-operative pneumothorax (aOR = 3.02, p = 0.042) were at increased risk of failure to improve diaphragmatic excursion. US parameters were more powerful tools in predicting diaphragmatic evolution compared with the 6MWT indexes: baseline diaphragm excursion and thickening fraction were associated with complete diaphragmatic functional recovery after CR (aOR = 9.101, p < 0.001, and aOR = 1.058, p = 0.020 respectively). US is a valuable tool for the assessment of post-operative diaphragmatic dysfunction and can identify patients at risk of diaphragmatic recovery failure.

Diaphragm Ultrasound in Cardiac Surgery: State of the Art

In cardiac surgery, patients are at risk of phrenic nerve injury, which leads to diaphragm dysfunction and acute respiratory failure. Diaphragm dysfunction (DD) is relatively frequent in cardiac surgery and particularly affects patients after coronary artery bypass graft. The onset of DD affects patients’ prognosis in term of weaning from mechanical ventilation and hospital length of stay. The authors present a narrative review about diaphragm physiology, techniques used to assess diaphragm function, and the clinical application of diaphragm ultrasound in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Perioperative Pulmonary Atelectasis: Part I. Biology and Mechanisms

Pulmonary atelectasis is common in the perioperative period. Physiologically, it is produced when collapsing forces derived from positive pleural pressure and surface tension overcome expanding forces from alveolar pressure and parenchymal tethering. Atelectasis impairs blood oxygenation and reduces lung compliance. It is increasingly recognized that it can also induce local tissue biologic responses, such as inflammation, local immune dysfunction, and damage of the alveolar-capillary barrier, with potential loss of lung fluid clearance, increased lung protein permeability, and susceptibility to infection, factors that can initiate or exaggerate lung injury. Mechanical ventilation of a heterogeneously aerated lung (e.g., in the presence of atelectatic lung tissue) involves biomechanical processes that may precipitate further lung damage: concentration of mechanical forces, propagation of gas-liquid interfaces, and remote overdistension. Knowledge of such pathophysiologic mechanisms of atelectasis and their consequences in the healthy and diseased lung should guide optimal clinical management.