1
|
Zhao P, Hou M, Liu Y, Liu HX, Huang RB, Yao HX, Niu T, Peng J, Jiang M, Han YQ, Hu JD, Zhou H, Zhou ZP, Qiu L, Zhang LS, Wang X, Wang HQ, Feng R, Yang LH, Ma LM, Wang SQ, Kong PY, Wang WS, Sun HP, Sun J, Zhou HB, Zhu TN, Wang LR, Zhang JY, Huang QS, Liu X, Fu HX, Li YY, Wang QF, Jiang Q, Jiang H, Lu J, Zhang XH. Risk stratification and outcomes of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with immune thrombocytopenia under 60 years of age. Platelets 2020; 32:633-641. [PMID: 32614630 DOI: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1786042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating complication of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, information on ICH in ITP patients under the age of 60 years is limited, and no predictive tools are available in clinical practice. A total of 93 adult patients with ITP who developed ICH before 60 years of age were retrospectively identified from 2005 to 2019 by 27 centers in China. For each case, 2 controls matched by the time of ITP diagnosis and the duration of ITP were provided by the same center. Multivariate analysis identified head trauma (OR = 3.216, 95%CI 1.296-7.979, P =.012), a platelet count ≤ 15,000/μL at the time of ITP diagnosis (OR = 1.679, 95%CI 1.044-2.698, P =.032) and severe/life-threatening bleeding (severe bleeding vs. mild bleeding, OR = 1.910, 95%CI 1.088-3.353, P =.024; life-threatening bleeding vs. mild bleeding, OR = 2.620, 95%CI 1.360-5.051, P =.004) as independent risk factors for ICH. Intraparenchymal hemorrhage (OR = 5.191, 95%CI 1.717-15.692, P =.004) and a history of severe bleeding (OR = 4.322, 95%CI 1.532-12.198, P =.006) were associated with the 30-day outcome of ICH. These findings may facilitate ICH risk stratification and outcome prediction in patients with ITP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Zhao
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Hou
- Department of Hematology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Geriatric Hematology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hui-Xin Liu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Rui-Bin Huang
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Hong-Xia Yao
- Department of Hematology, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou, China
| | - Ting Niu
- Department of Hemotology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jun Peng
- Department of Hematology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Ming Jiang
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Yan-Qiu Han
- Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China
| | - Jian-Da Hu
- Fujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hu Zhou
- Department of Hematology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ze-Ping Zhou
- Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Lin Qiu
- Department of Hematology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Lian-Sheng Zhang
- Department of Hematology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Hematology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Hua-Quan Wang
- Department of Hematology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ru Feng
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China
| | - Lin-Hua Yang
- Department of Hematology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Liang-Ming Ma
- Department of Hematology, Affiliated Shanxi Big Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Shun-Qing Wang
- Department of Hematology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei-Yan Kong
- Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Wen-Sheng Wang
- Department of Hematology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hui-Ping Sun
- Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Sun
- Nanfang Hospital, Nanfang Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - He-Bing Zhou
- Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Tie-Nan Zhu
- Department of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Li-Ru Wang
- Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jing-Yu Zhang
- Department of Hematology, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Qiu-Sha Huang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Liu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Hai-Xia Fu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yue-Ying Li
- Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qian-Fei Wang
- Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Jiang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Jiang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Lu
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Hui Zhang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hato T, Shimada N, Kurata Y, Kuwana M, Fujimura K, Kashiwagi H, Takafuta T, Murata M, Tomiyama Y. Risk factors for skin, mucosal, and organ bleeding in adults with primary ITP: a nationwide study in Japan. Blood Adv 2020; 4:1648-1655. [PMID: 32320469 PMCID: PMC7189281 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Bleeding manifestations in primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) range from skin petechiae to life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). However, the relation between these various bleeding manifestations and the platelet count in ITP remains poorly characterized. Using a nationwide database of patients with ITP during the years 2005 to 2014 (10 years) in Japan, we analyzed 19 415 adult patients newly diagnosed with ITP, including 222 with ICH. The frequency of skin purpura was 64.8%, and this increased linearly with thrombocytopenia without a specific platelet count threshold. In contrast, mucosal bleeding (epistaxis and gingival bleeding) and organ bleeding (melena, hematuria, and ICH) increased exponentially with thrombocytopenia at a platelet count threshold of 10 to 15 × 109/L. Age showed a much weaker correlation than platelet count with skin and mucosal bleeding. However, the incidence of organ bleeding increased exponentially above 60 years of age. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of mucosal bleeding was a risk factor for occurrence of melena and hematuria but not for ICH. The frequency of ICH was 1.1% and risk factors for ICH were age ≥60 years (odds ratio [OR], 3.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13-4.47; P < .001), platelet count <10 × 109/L (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.11-4.15; P < .001), and the presence of hematuria (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.04-2.35; P = .033). The relation between ICH and platelet count varied with age. This large-scale analysis of risk factors for bleeding in ITP has revealed distinct characteristics of skin, mucosal, and organ bleeding in adult patients with newly diagnosed ITP, thus indicating those who are at a high risk of severe organ bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Hato
- Department of Blood Transfusion and Cell Therapy, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Ehime, Japan
| | - Naoki Shimada
- Center for Basic Medical Research, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan
| | | | - Masataka Kuwana
- Department of Allergy and Rheumatology, Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kingo Fujimura
- Faculty of Nursing, Yasuda Women's University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Kashiwagi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshiro Takafuta
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hiroshima City Funairi Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Murata
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; and
| | - Yoshiaki Tomiyama
- Department of Blood Transfusion, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rodeghiero F, Woszczyk D, Slama B, Melikyan A, Viallard JF, Ouaja R, Cisse OA, Sadoun A, Salama A. Efficacy and Safety of IQYMUNE®, a Ten Percent Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Adult Patients With Chronic, Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia. J Hematol 2018; 7:87-95. [PMID: 32300420 PMCID: PMC7155829 DOI: 10.14740/jh385w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) IQYMUNE® is a highly purified 10% IVIG that was assessed using the new stringent definition of response described in the revised guideline on the clinical investigation of IVIG. The efficacy and the safety of IQYMUNE® were investigated in adult patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Methods In this phase III multinational, multicentre, prospective, uncontrolled, open-label, single-arm study, adult patients with a baseline platelet count < 30 × 109/L were treated with IVIG 10% at a dose of 2 g/kg body weight administered over 2 consecutive days. The primary endpoint was Response over the study period and was defined according to the recent and most stringent European Medicines Agency guidelines (platelet count ≥ 30 × 109/L and a ≥ 2-fold increase from baseline, no new bleeding, and no concomitant treatment with drugs that affect platelet count and/or induce bleeding cessation). Results Thirty-eight patients were enrolled; 73 infusions were administered (38 on Day 1 and 35 on Day 2). Response was reached by 24 patients corresponding to 63.2% of patients in the full analysis set (95% CI: 46.0; 78.2) and 68.6% of patients in the per-protocol set (95% CI: 50.7; 83.1). The median time to Response was 1 day. The median duration of Response was 13.5 days. Reasons for non-response were failure to reach the required platelet count (n = 12), a new bleeding event (n = 1), and forbidden medication use (n = 1). Among the 23 patients with a baseline platelet count ≤ 20 × 109/L, 19 patients (82.6%) achieved a platelet count ≥ 50 × 109/L at least once before Day 5 (previous European Medicines Agency definition of response). Treatment was well tolerated even in patients with a high flow rate (≥ 6 mL/kg/h in 40% of patients). Headache (34.2%), pyrexia (15.8%), and creatinine renal clearance decrease, including one case of decrease in glomerular filtration rate (10.5%) were the most frequently reported drug-related adverse events. Conclusions Administration of IQYMUNE® for 2 consecutive days at a dose of 2 g/kg was safe and efficacious. These results support the treatment of adult patients with chronic ITP with IQYMUNE®.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Rodeghiero
- Hematology Project Foundation, Vicenza-Affiliated to the Hematology Department, S. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Dariusz Woszczyk
- Hematology Department, University of Opole, Opole Provincial Hospital, Opole, Poland
| | - Borhane Slama
- Hematology Department, Henri Duffaut Hospital, Avignon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Abdulgabar Salama
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Charite Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sholapur NS, Hamilton K, Butler L, Heddle NM, Arnold DM. An evaluation of overall effectiveness and treatment satisfaction with intravenous immunoglobulin among patients with immune thrombocytopenia. Transfusion 2016; 56:1739-44. [PMID: 27145296 DOI: 10.1111/trf.13628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2015] [Revised: 03/27/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A global assessment of patient satisfaction that considers therapeutic effect, toxicities, and convenience is needed to evaluate the acceptability of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as a treatment for patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We performed a cross-sectional pilot study to assess the feasibility and usefulness of a treatment satisfaction questionnaire for adult patients with ITP receiving IVIG in an academic hematology clinic. Treatment satisfaction was evaluated by administration of a validated survey-based tool 7 days after IVIG administration. The tool assessed treatment satisfaction across four domains (effectiveness, toxicity, convenience, and global satisfaction); results were summarized with mean scores. RESULTS Twelve patients were enrolled (nine females; median age, 44 years; interquartile range, 35-69 years). Mean platelet increment after infusion was 54.2 × 10(9) /L (SD, 47.6 × 10(9) /L). Treatment satisfaction scores were highest in the side effect burden domain (88.2/100; SD, 19.3; higher scores indicate a lower burden of side effects). Six participants reported IVIG-associated toxicities; most were "slightly" or "not at all" dissatisfied by the impact of side effects. The domain with the lowest score was convenience (62.0/100; SD, 24.7). CONCLUSION The assessment of treatment satisfaction using a survey-based assessment tool was feasible for patients receiving IVIG and provided meaningful results that discriminated between domains. Patients found IVIG treatment to be inconvenient, but were satisfied with its tolerability as an ITP treatment. Larger studies are needed to determine the precise impact on each domain and the reproducibility of study results. Patient satisfaction scores can be used to compare different ITP treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naushin S Sholapur
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Health Research Methodology, Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology; and the, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Korinne Hamilton
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lianna Butler
- Department of Education Services, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy M Heddle
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Donald M Arnold
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|