National trials involving lymphatic mapping for melanoma: the multicenter selective lymphadenectomy trial, the sunbelt melanoma trial, and the florida melanoma trial

Weighing the value of completion nodal dissection for melanoma

In the United States, approximately half of patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy undergo a completion lymphadenectomy. Because of the equivocal survival benefits in pursuing a completion lymphadenectomy in these patients, surgeons must weigh the postoperative morbidity of the operation with concerns facing a patient's quality of life and risk of tumor recurrence. We discuss the value of a completion lymphadenectomy in light of the uncertainties facing this management strategy for melanoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:281-287. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma: results of 10 years' experience in two regional training hospitals in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I) demonstrated that the sentinel node (SN) status in cutaneous melanoma affects prognosis and that completion lymphadenectomy in SN-positive patients may improve survival. Our objective was to evaluate sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in two regional hospitals in the Netherlands.

METHODS

Patients with localized melanoma were planned for wide excision and SLNB. Completion lymphadenectomy was recommended for positive SN status. Data were compared with the MSLT-I.

RESULTS

A median of 2 (1-7) SNs were identified in 305 patients and complications occurred in 11%. Fifty-four patients (18%) demonstrated SN metastases and 45 underwent completion lymphadenectomy (20% additional metastases). Six patients with initially negative SN developed lymph node metastases (sensitivity 90%). Overall disease-free survival was 83% (SN-negative 91% vs. SN-positive 41%; p < 0.001) and melanoma-specific survival was 93% (SN-negative 97% vs. SN-positive 62%; p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed the SN status to be the most significant predictor for recurrence and melanoma-related death.

CONCLUSION

Our results of SLNB are comparable to data from high-volume centers participating in MSLT-I. From a patient perspective, the false-negative SN rate of 10% and complication rate of 11% should be weighed against being informed about prognosis and having a possible therapeutic benefit from completion lymphadenectomy.

Head and neck melanoma

The incidence of malignant melanoma appears to be increasing at an alarming rate throughout the world over the past 30–40 years and continues to increase in the United States, Canada, Australia, Asia, and Europe. The behavior of head and neck melanoma is aggressive, and it has an overall poorer prognosis than that of other skin sites. The authors review the published literature and text books, intending to give an overall picture of malignant melanomas of the head and neck and a special emphasis on treatment considerations with controversies in treatment including biopsy, radiation therapy, sentinel node biopsy, and nodal dissection.

The sentinel node concept in early cervical cancer performs well in tumors smaller than 2 cm

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the sentinel node (SLN) concept for lymphatic mapping in early stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

105 women with early stage (1a1-2a) cervical cancer were scheduled for the sentinel node procedure in conjunction with a complete pelvic lymphadenectomy. The day before surgery, 1-1.5 mL 120MBq Tc(99) albumin nanocolloid was injected submucosally at four points around the tumor followed by a lymphoscintigram (LSG) to achieve an overview of the radiotracer uptake.

RESULTS

During surgery, the overall detection rate (gamma probe) of at least one SLN was 90% (94/105 women) whereas at least one SLN was identified in 94% (61/65 women) with a tumor <or=2 cm. Bilateral SLNs were identified in 62/105 (59%) of the women. Among 18 women with any metastatic lymph node 17 had a metastatic SLN (sensitivity 94%, 95% CI 73-100%). Among 61 women with a tumor <or=2 cm, all five women with any metastatic lymph node also had a metastatic SLN (sensitivity 100%). One woman with a 1.5-cm squamous epithelial carcinoma had metastatic positive SLNs on each side but also one metastatic bulky (>2 cm) node without radiotracer uptake. The negative predictive value for patients with cervical cancers <or=2 cm was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The SLN-technique seems to be an accurate method for identifying lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients with tumors of 2 cm or smaller. In case of a unilateral SLN only, a complete lymphadenectomy should be performed on the radionegative side. All bulky nodes must be removed.

Role of lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of solid tumors: an update on the clinical data

BACKGROUND

The role of lymphadenectomy as an adjunct of standard excision for treatment of cancer is highly debated and controversial. Standard practice for treatment of solid tumors is resection with regional lymphadenectomy. This surgical concept assumes that cancers grow and spread in an orderly manner, from primary cancer to regional lymph nodes and finally to vital organs. We reviewed randomized trials, published a description of lymphatic anatomy and physiology, and presented data that disputed the role of lymphadenectomy as standard practice. The present review updates the literature and reiterates the concept that lymphadenectomy does not increase survival in the surgical treatment of solid tumors.

METHODS

We reviewed the English-language literature (Medline) for prospective randomized trials and nonrandomized reports, as well as retrospective studies addressing the role of lymphadenectomy in cancers of the esophagus, lung, stomach, pancreas, breast, and skin (melanoma) reported between 2000 and 2006.

RESULTS

This extensive review demonstrates that there are few prospective randomized trials assessing patient survival with solid tumors that contrast resection with or without lymphadenectomy. However, there was at least one, and for some cancers more than one, prospective randomized trial for each organ site studied, and the data demonstrate no statistically significant difference in overall survival of patients treated with or without lymphadenectomy. Most nonrandomized and retrospective studies, with a few exceptions, support the conclusions of randomized trials; lymphadenectomy does not improve overall survival in solid tumors. Overall survival is primarily a function of the biological nature of the primary tumor, as evidenced by lymphovascular invasion, lymph node involvement, and other prognostic features.

CONCLUSIONS

This extensive literature review of recent reports indicates that lymphadenectomy does not improve overall survival. Lymph node resection should be conceived in terms of staging, prognosis, and regional control only.

Sentinel Node Mapping for Melanoma: Results of Trials and Current Applications

The value of sentinel node (SN) biopsy as a staging procedure and as a guide to prognosis with patients who have melanoma is now clearly established. As well, there is recent clinical trial evidence suggesting a survival benefit for patients found to be SN positive who have an immediate complete lymph node dissection (CLND), compared with those with nodal disease not treated by CLND until it becomes clinically apparent. Clinical trials are ongoing to determine whether CLND is necessary in all patients who are found to be SN positive.

The sentinel lymph node: Relevance in gynaecological cancers

AIMS

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection is widely practiced in the management of patients with malignant melanoma and beast cancer. Large studies on SLN detection and determination of nodal status have led to changes in the surgical management of the regional lymph nodes in these diseases. More recently attention has focused on other solid cancers, including gynaecological cancers.

METHODS

An extensive literature review of published reports on the SLN in gynaecological cancers was undertaken and the reports were categorised according to the level of evidence provided.

RESULTS

Vulva cancer is the most frequently investigated gynaecological cancer with regard to SLN detection because of its anatomical location and easily accessible nodal basin. Although there are no randomised controlled trials, some data suggest SLN detection in vulval cancer may alter clinical practice and reduce the number of groin lymphadenectomies. The lymphatic drainage of the other gynaecological organs is less predictable, the nodal basin less accessible or less well defined, the techniques not standardised and the evidence for the applicability of SLN detection in the management of these cancers is weak.

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node detection in vulval cancer may reduce the need for radical groin lymphadenectomy and thereby reduce morbidity. SLN detection for other gynaecological cancers has little potential to alter clinical practice.

High-risk melanoma with nodal involvement in a young woman

BACKGROUND

An 18-year-old female presented to her General Practitioner with a bleeding mole on her back. The mole had been present since childhood but had started to bleed in the past month. She was otherwise asymptomatic with no relevant previous medical history. Physical examination revealed a 1.5 cm 1.7 cm pigmented lesion on the left aspect of the patient's upper back. There was no palpable lymphadenopathy.

INVESTIGATIONS

Physical examination, excision biopsy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, CT scan of chest, abdomen and pelvis.

DIAGNOSIS

Stage IIIB (T3bN2aM0) focally ulcerated, nodular malignant melanoma (Breslow depth 2.5 mm, Clark's level IV).

MANAGEMENT

Wide re-excision, completion dissection of the left axillary lymph node, adjuvant high-dose interferon with maintenance interferon.

Diagnosis and treatment of malignant melanoma of the foot

BACKGROUND

Patients diagnosed with melanoma of the foot have been reported to have a poor prognosis. We reviewed our experience at a tertiary-care medical clinic to determine the disease course in patients diagnosed with melanoma of the foot.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 38 patients with a diagnosis of primary or locally recurrent melanoma of the foot treated between January, 1988, and July, 2004. The main outcome measures included methods of diagnosis, clinical and histopathologic features, and patterns of recurrence.

RESULTS

The mean age at diagnosis was 61 years; most were women (58%) and Caucasian (95%). The average time to diagnosis was 17 months. Initial clinical diagnosis had been considered benign in 12 (32%). The median Breslow thickness was 1.75 mm, T1 lesions were the most common, and acral lentiginous melanoma accounted for 42%. Thirteen patients (34%) had ulcerated lesions. Sentinel lymph node biopsy specimens of 25 patients identified four (16%) with metastatic disease. Surgical complications occurred in 12 patients, usually after skin graft or soft-tissue flap reconstruction. Systemic recurrence developed in six patients, four of whom also had regional recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients were elderly Caucasian women and most presented with early-stage disease, but diagnosis can be difficult and a subgroup presented with thick melanomas. Reconstructive surgical procedures had a high rate of complications; however, overall functional outcomes were good. Stage of cancer at diagnosis was associated with systemic metastases.

Melanoma patients with positive sentinel nodes who did not undergo completion lymphadenectomy: a multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is considered the standard of care in melanoma patients found to have sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis. However, the therapeutic utility of CLND is not known. The natural history of patients with positive SLNs who do not undergo CLND is undefined. This multi-institutional study was undertaken to characterize patterns of failure and survival rates in these patients and to compare results with those of positive-SLN patients who underwent CLND.

METHODS

Surgeons from 16 centers contributed data on 134 positive-SLN patients who did not undergo CLND. SLN biopsy was performed by using each institution's established protocols. Patients were followed up for recurrence and survival.

RESULTS

In this study population, the median age was 59 years, and 62% were male. The median tumor thickness was 2.6 mm, 77% of tumors had invasion to Clark level IV/V, and 33% of lesions were ulcerated. The primary melanoma was located on the extremities, trunk, and head/neck in 45%, 43%, and 12%, respectively. The median follow-up was 20 months. The median time to recurrence was 11 months. Nodal recurrence was a component of the first site of recurrence in 20 patients (15%). Nodal recurrence-free survival was statistically insignificantly worse than that seen in a contemporary cohort of patients who underwent CLND. Disease-specific survival for positive-SLN patients who did not undergo CLND was 80% at 36 months, which was not significantly different from that of patients who underwent CLND.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the importance of ongoing prospective randomized trials in determining the therapeutic value of CLND after positive SLN biopsy in melanoma patients.

Population-based analysis of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy utilization for intermediate thickness melanoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy (LM/SL) is the nodal staging procedure of choice for patients with intermediate thickness melanoma. We hypothesize that a significant portion of these patients are not undergoing LM/SL. We explore factors that influence use of LM/SL.

METHODS

Analysis was performed of all incident cases of invasive cutaneous melanoma in North Carolina between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2001.

RESULTS

Three thousand four hundred and thirty-six cases of melanoma were reported for 1999-2001. Two hundred and seventy-three cases (8%) were excluded due to metastases. Nine hundred and sixteen cases (29%) were excluded because the T classification was not reported. Of the remaining cases, 1,242 (55%) were intermediate thickness (T2-3); 48% (596/1,242) underwent LM/SL. Subjects >or=60 years old were less likely to receive LM/SL than subjects <60 years (39% vs. 55.4%, P < 0.001). Subjects with head/neck primary tumors were less likely to receive LM/SL than other subjects (33% vs. 51%, P < 0.001). Subjects with T3 tumors were more likely to receive LM/SL than those with T2 tumors (54% vs. 42%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of all patients with intermediate thickness melanoma in North Carolina do not receive LM/SL. Use of LM/SL varies by patient age and primary tumor site. Further investigation is warranted to explore these differences.

Does sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous head and neck melanoma alter disease outcome?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In the head and neck region, value, reliability, and safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) have not yet been determined conclusively. The aim of study was to assess impact of SLNB on disease outcome in cutaneous head and neck melanoma.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with a clinically node-negative head and neck melanoma, > or =1.0 mm Breslow thickness, participated in a prospective study from 1995 to 2005. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) tumor-positive patients underwent completion lymphadenectomy. SLN tumor-negative patients underwent clinical monitoring. Median follow-up was 54 (range 10-114) months. Recurrence-free and overall survival curves were constructed by Kaplan-Meier.

RESULTS

SLNs could be identified in 33 patients (92%). In 7 patients (21%) the SLN was tumor-positive. In 1 patient (13%) the SLNB was false-negative. In 17 patients (47%) SLNs could be identified in the parotid region (success rate parotid region 100%). This study showed no significant difference in recurrence-free and overall survival between patients with tumor-positive and tumor-negative SLN.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and accuracy of SLNB in the neck and parotid nodal basins were similar to those in non-head and neck sites. However, the technique is technically demanding in this region. In this small series SLNB did not alter disease outcome.

Head and neck melanoma

BACKGROUND

Melanoma of the head and neck and its treatment are complex issues. The behavior of head and neck melanoma is aggressive, and it has an overall poorer prognosis than that of other skin sites.

METHODS

The authors review current data on the treatment of head and neck melanoma, including both cutaneous and mucosal melanoma.

RESULTS

Current understanding of the behavior of head and neck melanoma is reviewed and treatment stratagems are presented. Controversies in treatment include lymphoscintigraphy with sentinel node biopsy, nodal dissection, margin size, role of radiation therapy, and reconstruction. The management goal is to treat melanoma aggressively while minimizing the effects of treatment on patient quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to its aggressiveness, head and neck melanoma should be treated aggressively when morbidity is not significantly increased. Patient specific treatment is imperative.

Sentinel Lymph Node Tumor Load: An Independent Predictor of Additional Lymph Node Involvement and Survival in Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Even though 60% to 80% of melanoma patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) have no positive additional lymph nodes (ALNs), all these patients are subjected to an ALN dissection (ALND) with its associated morbidity. The aim of this study was to predict the absence of ALN metastases in patients with a positive SLN by using features of the primary melanoma and SLN tumor load.

METHODS

Of 71 SLN-positive patients, 52 had metastasis limited to the SLN (group 1), and 19 had > or =1 positive ALN after ALND (group 2). The tumor load of the SLN was assessed by measuring the total surface area by computerized morphometry. Breslow thickness, ulceration and lymphatic invasion of the primary tumor, and total SLN metastatic area were tested as covariates predicting the absence of positive ALNs.

RESULTS

The mean SLN metastatic area was 1.18 mm(2) (group 1) and 3.39 mm(2) (group 2) (P = .003) and was the only significant and independent factor after multivariate analysis (P = .02). None of the patients with both a Breslow thickness <2.5 mm and an SLN metastatic area <.3 mm(2) had a positive ALN.

CONCLUSIONS

SLN metastatic area can be used to predict the absence of positive ALNs in melanoma patients. In this study, patients with a Breslow thickness <2.5 mm and an SLN tumor load <.3 mm(2 )seemed to have no positive ALN and had excellent survival. We hypothesize that this subgroup might not benefit from ALND. Prospective larger trials, using this model and randomizing between ALND and no ALND, should confirm this hypothesis.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) offers a minimally invasive technique to examine the proximal lymph node basin for micrometastases in clinically N0 necks in patients head and neck cancer. This technique has been validated in the management of breast cancer and cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) and is under active investigation in the management of multiple other solid tumors.SLNB is used routinely in the management of head and neck melanoma and is investigational for other cancers of the head and neck. SLNB provides prognostic information for patients with CMM and identifies those patients that may benefit from additional treatment. This article examines the history, rationale,science, and current status of SLNB in head and neck with emphasis on melanoma.