Pharmacogenetic influences on treatment response and toxicity in colorectal cancer

The cost-effectiveness of alectinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) advanced NSCLC previously treated with crizotinib

Introduction Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) targeting drugs provide an important option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with this distinct tumor type; however, there is considerable uncertainty as to which drug provides the optimal value after crizotinib treatment. This study estimated the cost-utility of alectinib vs ceritinib from a US payer perspective. Methods A cost-utility model was developed using partition survival methods and three health states: progression-free (PF), post-progression (PP), and death. Survival data were derived from the key clinical trials (alectinib: NP28761 & NP28673, ceritinib: ASCEND I and II). Costs included drugs, adverse events, and supportive care. Utilities were based on trial data and the literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to assess parameter uncertainty. Results Treatment with alectinib vs ceritinib resulted in increases of 2.55 months in the PF state, 0.44 quality adjusted life-years (QALYs), and $13,868, yielding a mean cost/QALY of $31,180. In the PSA, alectinib had a 96% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000/QALY. Drivers of model results were drug costs and utilities in the PF health state. The ICER ranged from $10,600-$65,000 per QALY in scenario analyses, including a sub-group analysis limited to patients with prior chemotherapy and crizotinib treatment. Conclusions Treatment with alectinib in ALK + crizotinib-treated patients increased time progression-free and QALYs vs ceritinib. The marginal cost increase was driven by longer treatment durations with alectinib. This model demonstrates that alectinib may be considered a cost-effective treatment after progression on crizotinib.

The potential clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacogenomic approaches to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Pharmacogenomic applications in oncology offer significant promise, but the clinical and economic implications remain unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential cost-utility of implementing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing before initiating second-line therapy for advanced refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We developed a decision analytic model to evaluate the cost-utility of EGFR protein expression or gene copy number testing compared to standard care with erlotinib in refractory advanced NSCLC patients. Costs and utilities were obtained from publicly available sources. We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate uncertainty in the results.

RESULTS

The quality-adjusted life expectancies for erlotinib, EGFR protein expression testing, and gene copy number testing were: 0.44, 0.48, and 0.50 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); and the costs were: $57,238, $63,512, and $66,447, respectively. The most cost-effective testing option, EGFR gene copy number testing, produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $162,018/QALY compared to no testing (erlotinib). The results were most sensitive to the survival estimates, health state utilities, and cost of disease progression. In the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, erlotinib without testing was the optimal treatment strategy until the $150,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, after which gene copy testing was optimal. The discounted expected value of perfect information at a $100,000/QALY threshold in the USA over 5 years was $31.4 million.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results suggest that EGFR pharmacogenomic testing has the potential to improve quality-adjusted life expectancy in the treatment of refractory NSCLC by a clinically meaningful margin at a value commensurate with the approved therapies in this setting. Additional research in this area is warranted.

Utility of Pretreatment Bilirubin Level and UGT1A1 Polymorphisms in Multivariate Predictive Models of Neutropenia Associated with Irinotecan Treatment in Previously Untreated Patients with Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE: Statistical models for predicting hematologic toxicity were evaluated based on UGT1A1 polymorphisms and baseline serum bilirubin. METHODS: Blood DNA samples were collected from 113 patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving irinotecan (FOLFIRI, n = 36; mIFL, n = 41; CapeIRI, n = 36). The primary endpoint was absolute neutrophil count nadir during first treatment cycle. Linear regression models, with increased R(2) implying important additional predictive power, sequentially added age, sex, baseline bilirubin level, and UGT1A1 genotype. RESULTS: All models demonstrated low R(2), suggesting unaccounted variables. UGT1A1 genotype added approximately 8-9% during cycle 1 and from approximately 7% [mIFL regimen] to 26% [CapeIRI regimen] after cycle 1. Correlation between genotype and overall ANC nadir without regard to treatment was low (R = -0.201, P = 0.035). Patients with genotype 7/7 may have increased risk for severe neutropenia, but data are insufficient to characterize this. Contribution of baseline bilirubin level was negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Ability of UGT1A1 or baseline bilirubin to predict neutropenia is low and depends on regimen.

Regulation of genes of the circadian clock in human colon cancer: reduced period-1 and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase transcription correlates in high-grade tumors

Expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) displays a regular daily oscillation in nonmalignant cells. In colorectal cancer cells, the expression of this 5-fluorouracil-metabolizing enzyme is decreased, but the reason remains unclear. In this study, we analyzed by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) the expression of DPD and of members of the cellular oscillation machinery, period 1 (Per1), period 2 (Per2), and CLOCK, in primary colorectal tumors and normal colon mucosa derived from the same patients. Analysis of tumors according to differentiation grade revealed a 0.46-fold (P = 0.005) decrease for DPD mRNA and a 0.49-fold (P = 0.004) decrease for Per1 mRNA in undifferentiated (G3) tumors compared with paired normal mucosa. In this tumor cohort, the correlation between DPD and Per1 levels was r = 0.64, P < 0.01. In moderately differentiated (G2) colon carcinomas, reduction of DPD and Per1 mRNA levels did not reach significance, but a significant correlation between the respective mRNA levels was detectable (r = 0.54; P < 0.05). The decrease and correlation of DPD and Per1 mRNA levels were even more pronounced in female (G3) patients (DPD: female, 0.35-fold, P < 0.001 versus male, 0.58-fold, P < 0.05; and Per1: female, 0.47-fold, P < 0.01 versus male, 0.52-fold, P < 0.01). The highly significant correlation of DPD mRNA with Per1 mRNA expression suggests control of DPD transcription by the endogenous cellular clock, which is more pronounced in women. Our results also revealed a disturbed transcription of Per1 during tumor progression, which might be the cause for disrupted daily oscillation of DPD in undifferentiated colon carcinoma cells.

Pharmacogenetics of capecitabine in advanced breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Germinal gene polymorphisms can explain a part of the interpatient pharmacodynamic variability of anticancer drugs, particularly fluoropyrimidines. Genes for which polymorphisms may potentially influence pharmacodynamics of fluoropyrimidines, including capecitabine, are thymidylate synthase (TS), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The aim of this prospective pilot study was to analyze the effect of TS, MTHFR, and DPD gene polymorphisms on toxicity and efficacy in advanced breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine as monotherapy. Germinal polymorphisms of TS (6 bp deletion in the 3' region and 28 bp repeats, including G>C mutation in the 5' region), MTHFR (677C>T and 1298A>C), and DPD (IVS14+1G>A) were determined in 105 consecutive patients.

RESULTS

A trend toward a higher global toxicity grade 3 and 4 was observed in patients homozygous for the TS 3RG allele compared with patients heterozygous for the 3RG allele or patients not carrying the 3RG allele (50% versus 19% versus 13% respectively, P=0.064). The sole patient bearing the DPD IVS14+1G>A mutation (heterozygous) deceased from hematologic toxicity. The median response duration was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3-7.2). Duration of response was significantly shortened in patients homozygous for the 3RG allele compared with others (P=0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

The present data suggest that 3RG3RG breast cancer patients are not good candidates for capecitabine therapy. In addition, attention should be paid to DPD deficiency in breast cancer patients receiving capecitabine. These preliminary data require further confirmation on a larger number of patients.

MDR1 genotype-related pharmacokinetics: fact or fiction?

Multidrug resistant transporter MDR1/P-glycoprotein, the gene product of MDR1, is a glycosylated membrane protein of 170 kDa, belonging to the ATP-binding cassette superfamily of membrane transporters. A number of various types of structurally unrelated drugs are substrates for MDR1, and MDR1 and other transporters are recognized as an important class of proteins for regulating pharmacokinetics. The first investigation of the effects of MDR1 genotypes on pharmacotherapy was reported in 2000; a silent single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), C3435T in exon 26, was found to be associated with the duodenal expression of MDR1, and thereby the plasma concentration of digoxin after oral administration. In the last 5 years, clinical studies have been conducted around the world on the association of MDR1 genotype with MDR1 expression and function in tissues, and with the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs; however, there are still discrepancies in the results on C3435T. In 1995, a novel concept to predict in vivo oral pharmacokinetic performance from data on in vivo permeability and in vitro solubility has been proposed, and this Biopharmaceutical Classification System strongly suggested that the effects of intestinal MDR1 on the intestinal absorption of substrates is minimal in the case of commercially available oral drugs, and therefore MDR1 genotypes are little associated with the pharmacokinetics after oral administration. This review summarizes the latest reports for the future individualization of pharmacotherapy based on MDR1 genotyping, and attempts to explain discrepancies.

Genetic determinants of cancer drug efficacy and toxicity: practical considerations and perspectives

Drug-metabolizing enzymes are responsible for the activation or detoxification of cytotoxic drugs. Allelic variants are present with a variable frequency in different populations around the world and have an important role in the therapeutic index of such drugs. It is known that polymorphisms in thiopurine methyltransferase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase have been associated with altered drug metabolism and increased risk of severe toxicity from 6-mercaptopurine and 5-fluorouracil, respectively. Additionally, a variant number of dinucleotide-repeat sequences in the promotor for uridine 5'-diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 influences the glucuronidation of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, which is associated with severe toxicity, including diarrhea and neutropenia. In the same way, polymorphisms in thymidylate synthase have been associated with pyrimidine-associated toxicity and also with response to chemotherapy. The examples shown in this review demonstrate the usefulness of pre-screening patients for well-characterized polymorphism to identify the best-tolerated and most-effective treatment.

Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in oncology therapeutic antibody development

Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics are keys to the success of personalized medicine, prescribing drugs based on a patien's individual genetic and biological profile. In this review, we will focus on the application of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in developing monoclonal antibody (MAb) therapeutics in oncology. The significance of pharmacogenomics in MAb therapeutics is highlighted by the association between polymorphisms in Fc receptors and clinical response to anti-CD20 MAb rituximab (Rituxan®) or anti-ganglioside GD2 MAb 3F8, as well as the potential link between polymorphisms in HER2 and cardiac toxicity in patients treated with the anti-HER2 MAb trastuzumab (Herceptin®). The dependence on gene copy number or expression levels ofHER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) for therapeutic efficacy of trastuzumab and cetuximab (Erbitux®), respectively, supports the importance of selecting suitable patient populations based on their pharmacogenetic profile. In addition, a better understanding of target mutation status and biological consequences will benefit MAb development and may guide clinical development and use of these innovative therapeutics. The application of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in developing MAb therapeutics will be largely dependent on the discovery of novel surrogate biomarkers and identification of disease- and therapeutics-relevant polymorphisms. Challenges and opportunities in biomarker discovery and validation, and in implementing clinical pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in oncology MAb development and clinical practice will also be discussed.