1
|
Zhang H, Zheng J, Hu N, Liu Y, Yang G, Liu M, Jing H, Huo L. The status of nuclear medicine in China: the first official national survey. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:2172-2178. [PMID: 38561514 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06687-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
AIM/INTRODUCTION The National Nuclear Medicine Quality Control Center of China conducted the first official survey to investigate the nationwide situation of nuclear medicine in 2020. The survey aimed to unveil the current nuclear medicine situation and its quality control in China. MATERIALS AND METHODS The web-based survey was conducted and the data was collected via the National Clinical Improvement System (NCIS) of China from 1st April to 31st May 2021. RESULTS A total of 808 institutes across 30 provinces responded to the national survey. For human resources, there are 4460 physicians, 3077 technologists, 339 physicists, and 309 radiochemists. There are 887 single-photon imaging instruments, including 823 SPECT or SPECT/CT, and 365 PET instruments including 314 PET/CT. Six hundred twenty-four institutes perform SPECT examinations and 319 institutes perform PET examinations. 60% of SPECT scans are bone scintigraphy. A total of 97% of PET scans use an [18F]F-FDG tracer. Furthermore, 587 institutes provide radionuclide therapy services but only 280 institutes have admission rooms. The top three radionuclide therapies are [131I] therapy of hyperthyroidism with 546 institutes, [89Sr] therapy of bone metastasis with 400 institutes, and [131I] therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer with 286 institutes. Finally, for the frequency of equipment quality control per year, there are about 67 times self-test within the department for SPECT instruments and 111 times for PET instruments on average in each province. There are about three failures of SPECT and five failures of PET on average per year in each province. There are 408 institutes (of 624 SPECT institutes) performing quality control of SPECT radiopharmaceuticals, 216 (of 319) for PET radiopharmaceuticals, and 373 (of 587) for radionuclide therapy. CONCLUSION These results of the first official survey towards current status of nuclear medicine in China are the foundation for the establishment of the quality control management system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiqiong Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, National Nuclear Medicine Quality Control Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Dongdan Campus), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Jin Zheng
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nan Hu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, National Nuclear Medicine Quality Control Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Dongdan Campus), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Yu Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, National Nuclear Medicine Quality Control Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Dongdan Campus), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Guangjie Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, National Nuclear Medicine Quality Control Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Dongdan Campus), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Meixi Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, National Nuclear Medicine Quality Control Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Dongdan Campus), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Hongli Jing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, National Nuclear Medicine Quality Control Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Dongdan Campus), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Li Huo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, National Nuclear Medicine Quality Control Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Dongdan Campus), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vinjamuri S, Pant V, Bomanji JB, Marengo M, Zanial A, Dondi M, Paez D. Assessing nuclear medicine practices: a critical evaluation of QUANUM through a quality improvement perspective and its wider relevance. Nucl Med Commun 2024; 45:263-267. [PMID: 38247573 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Quality Management Audits in Nuclear Medicine (QUANUM) is an initiative conceived by the International Atomic Energy Agency to enhance global standards in Nuclear Medicine practices. Acknowledging the intricate regulatory frameworks and the necessity for multidisciplinary collaboration, QUANUM has gained global acceptance, demonstrating widespread implementation and positive impacts on patient care. This manuscript critically evaluates the QUANUM program through the lens of quality improvement (QI), by employing established and validated QI tools. Our analysis identifies areas of conformance, underscores key strengths inherent to QUANUM, and pinpoints further learning opportunities for continuous enhancement. Additionally, we assert that the insights derived from scrutinizing this global project within Nuclear Medicine, have valuable implications for departments aspiring for establishing good quality management systems, thereby contributing to the improvement of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sobhan Vinjamuri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool,
| | - Vineet Pant
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool,
| | - Jamshed B Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK,
| | - Mario Marengo
- Azienda Ospedaliera S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy,
| | - Ahmadzaid Zanial
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, General Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and
| | - Maurizio Dondi
- Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health; IAEA, Vienna, Austria
| | - Diana Paez
- Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health; IAEA, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delgado Bolton RC, Giammarile F, Howlett DC, Jornet N, Brady AP, Coffey M, Hierath M, Clark J, Wadsak W. The QuADRANT study: current status and recommendations for improving uptake and implementation of clinical audit of medical radiological procedures in Europe-the nuclear medicine perspective. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2576-2581. [PMID: 37162511 PMCID: PMC10170043 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06203-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto C Delgado Bolton
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital San Pedro and Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
| | - Francesco Giammarile
- Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria.
| | | | - Nuria Jornet
- European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Mary Coffey
- European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
The relative contribution of photons and positrons to skin dose in the handling of PET radiopharmaceuticals. Appl Radiat Isot 2023; 194:110705. [PMID: 36731393 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recommendations to use syringe and vial shields to reduce exposure of the hands of staff when manipulating PET radiopharmaceuticals, operators sometimes prefer to work without shields, believing that the faster handling limits the equivalent dose. The aim of this work is to show that this approach does not properly consider the contribution of positrons to the dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the Varskin+ code, skin doses were calculated for syringes of various sizes, filled with 18F, 11C or 68Ga solution. Syringes without shielding, or shielded with 2 mm and 10 mm of tungsten were considered. RESULTS Dose rate values in mSv/s per MBq, averaged on a 1 cm2 surface at a depth of 0.07 mm were calculated for all the above conditions. For example, in the case of 3 mL 18F syringe at 1 mm from the skin, the dose rate without shielding is 1.32E-02 and 8.63E-04 for positrons and photons respectively. For 11C, the corresponding dose rates are 4.70E-02 and 8.90E-04 respectively, and for 68Ga, 8.52E-02 and 9.48E-04. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that the dose due to positrons is the principal component of skin irradiation, by a factor of 3-100, depending on the conditions. The use of shields for syringes and vials is necessary to avoid unjustified skin exposures, that may challenge dose limits. In our opinion, automatic systems for dispensing and allowing injection with shielded syringes, or automatic injectors, are economically justified and should be adopted in PET.
Collapse
|
5
|
Donzé C, Rubira L, Santoro L, Kotzki PO, Deshayes E, Fersing C. Development and Implementation of a Professional Practices Evaluation during Radiopharmaceuticals Administration. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:2247. [PMID: 36360590 PMCID: PMC9690994 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10112247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Securing both the patient and radiopharmaceuticals (RPs) circuit is an essential concern in nuclear medicine (NM). These circuits converge at the RP administration phase, a key step in patient management in NM. In a continuous quality improvement approach, we developed and implemented an evaluation of professional practices (EPPs) methodology focused on RPs injection to identify and correct deviations from good practices. The nuclear medicine technologists (NMTs) of a single center were evaluated. A specific audit grid was designed for this purpose, covering 4 main themes. Following the audit campaign, an improvement action plan was set up to address the non-conformities observed. Nine NMTs were audited on 4 RPs injections each. The mean total score was 93.36% with, on average, 7.01% and 3.00% of unmet and partially met criteria, respectively. In view of the non-compliance rates of hygiene and radiation protection items, theoretical reviews of these themes were included in the improvement action plan. As a part of the quality assurance system of a healthcare unit, EPPs are useful for identifying and correcting practice deviations at an early stage. They should be regularly repeated and combined with rigorous training and qualification of operators involved in RPs injection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Donzé
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Léa Rubira
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Lore Santoro
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Olivier Kotzki
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuel Deshayes
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Cyril Fersing
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
- IBMM, University Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, 34293 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Quality assurance and quality controls in nuclear medicine. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00182-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
7
|
Grigoryan A, Bouyoucef S, Sathekge M, Vorster M, Orellana P, Estrada E, Mikhail Lette M, Morozova O, Pellet O, Paez D, Delgado Bolton RC, Giammarile F. Development of nuclear medicine in Africa. Clin Transl Imaging 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-021-00468-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
8
|
Hricak H, Abdel-Wahab M, Atun R, Lette MM, Paez D, Brink JA, Donoso-Bach L, Frija G, Hierath M, Holmberg O, Khong PL, Lewis JS, McGinty G, Oyen WJG, Shulman LN, Ward ZJ, Scott AM. Medical imaging and nuclear medicine: a Lancet Oncology Commission. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e136-e172. [PMID: 33676609 PMCID: PMC8444235 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30751-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The diagnosis and treatment of patients with cancer requires access to imaging to ensure accurate management decisions and optimal outcomes. Our global assessment of imaging and nuclear medicine resources identified substantial shortages in equipment and workforce, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). A microsimulation model of 11 cancers showed that the scale-up of imaging would avert 3·2% (2·46 million) of all 76·0 million deaths caused by the modelled cancers worldwide between 2020 and 2030, saving 54·92 million life-years. A comprehensive scale-up of imaging, treatment, and care quality would avert 9·55 million (12·5%) of all cancer deaths caused by the modelled cancers worldwide, saving 232·30 million life-years. Scale-up of imaging would cost US$6·84 billion in 2020-30 but yield lifetime productivity gains of $1·23 trillion worldwide, a net return of $179·19 per $1 invested. Combining the scale-up of imaging, treatment, and quality of care would provide a net benefit of $2·66 trillion and a net return of $12·43 per $1 invested. With the use of a conservative approach regarding human capital, the scale-up of imaging alone would provide a net benefit of $209·46 billion and net return of $31·61 per $1 invested. With comprehensive scale-up, the worldwide net benefit using the human capital approach is $340·42 billion and the return per dollar invested is $2·46. These improved health and economic outcomes hold true across all geographical regions. We propose actions and investments that would enhance access to imaging equipment, workforce capacity, digital technology, radiopharmaceuticals, and research and training programmes in LMICs, to produce massive health and economic benefits and reduce the burden of cancer globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedvig Hricak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| | - May Abdel-Wahab
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health, Vienna, Austria; Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Rifat Atun
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Diana Paez
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health, Vienna, Austria
| | - James A Brink
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lluís Donoso-Bach
- Department of Medical Imaging, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Ola Holmberg
- Radiation Protection of Patients Unit, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pek-Lan Khong
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Jason S Lewis
- Department of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Programme, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Departments of Pharmacology and Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geraldine McGinty
- Departments of Radiology and Population Science, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA
| | - Wim J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Lawrence N Shulman
- Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zachary J Ward
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nagy F, Krizsan AK, Kukuts K, Szolikova M, Hascsi Z, Barna S, Acs A, Szabo P, Tron L, Balkay L, Dahlbom M, Zentai M, Forgacs A, Garai I. Q-Bot: automatic DICOM metadata monitoring for the next level of quality management in nuclear medicine. EJNMMI Phys 2021; 8:28. [PMID: 33738627 PMCID: PMC7973342 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00371-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regular and precise inspection of the realization of the local nuclear medicine standard operation procedures (SOPs) is very complex and time-consuming, especially when large amount of patient data is obtained from a wide scale of different scan procedures on a daily basis. DICOM metadata comprise a complete set of data related to the patient and the imaging procedure, and consequently all information necessary to evaluate the compliance with the actual SOP. METHODS Q-Bot, an automatic DICOM metadata monitoring tool which is capable to verify SOP conformities, was tested for 11 months at two nuclear medicine departments. Relevant parameters, such as patient ID, patient mass and height, injected activity, and uptake time, were investigated in the case of adult 18F-FDG whole-body PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP gamma camera bone scans on a daily basis. Q-Bot automatically inspected the actual SOP compliance of these relevant DICOM parameters. Q-Bot graphical user interface (GUI) provided a summary of the outliers in a table format to be investigated by a dedicated technologist. In addition, information related to the error handling was also collected for retrospective analysis of long-term tendencies. RESULTS In total, 6702 PET/CT and 2502 gamma camera scans were inspected, from which 8581 were confirmed as valid patient study without errors. Discrepancies related to the lack of a parameter, not appropriate format, or improper scan procedures were found in 623 cases, and 156 out of these were corrected before the medical reading and reporting. SOP non-conformities explored with Q-Bot were found to be non-correctable in 467 cases. Systematic errors to our practice turned out to be the manual radiopharmaceutical injection, the allowance to use both SI and non-SI units, and the clear definition of decimal point symbol to use. CONCLUSION The daily evaluation of Q-Bot results provided early detection of errors and consequently ensured the minimization of error propagation. Integration of a QM software that inspects protocol compliance at a nuclear medicine department provides significant support to detect non-conformities for technologists, and much higher confidence in image quality for physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferenc Nagy
- ScanoMed Nuclear Medicine Centers, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
| | - Aron K Krizsan
- ScanoMed Nuclear Medicine Centers, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary
| | - Kornél Kukuts
- ScanoMed Nuclear Medicine Centers, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary
| | | | - Zsolt Hascsi
- ScanoMed Nuclear Medicine Centers, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary
| | - Sandor Barna
- ScanoMed Nuclear Medicine Centers, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary
| | - Antonietta Acs
- ScanoMed Nuclear Medicine Centers, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary
| | - Peter Szabo
- ScanoMed Nuclear Medicine Centers, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary
| | - Lajos Tron
- Medical Imaging Clinic-Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Laszlo Balkay
- Medical Imaging Clinic-Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Magnus Dahlbom
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | - Attila Forgacs
- ScanoMed Nuclear Medicine Centers, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary
| | - Ildiko Garai
- ScanoMed Nuclear Medicine Centers, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hosselet C, Peyronnet D, Lamballais M, Smadja C, Verrey AS, Tyranowicz S, Galvez D, Joyes P, Danguy des Deserts L, Félice K, Lancelot S. [Quality guidelines for radiopharmacy: Development of a risk-assessment tool]. ANNALES PHARMACEUTIQUES FRANÇAISES 2021; 79:572-581. [PMID: 33524336 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharma.2021.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The medical management of patients, which involves securing the drug circuit, is a major public health objective. As part of quality management, a number of risk assessment and risk management tools in care units are validated and available. However, medication management in radiopharmacy departments represents a complex and specific process. The aim of the "Quality guidelines for radiopharmacy" working group of the French society of radiopharmacy (SoFRa) was to develop a risk-assessment tool that is a priori adapted to radiopharmacy activity. METHODS A qualitative risk matrix was developed, based on available analysis tools and current regulations concerning radiopharmacy practice. The tool was then programmed to obtain a summary and scoring for each risk category, as well as a quantitative analysis of the risks identified in radiopharmacy. RESULTS Our tool contains 262 issues. The qualitative study integrates the risks related to the circuit of radiopharmaceuticals, but also risks related to personnel. The quantitative study makes it possible to carry out an automated analysis of the actions to carry out in priority to improve the practices. CONCLUSIONS This work led to the development of a self-assessment tool for the a priori analysis of risks that are adapted to the practice of radiopharmacy. It allows easy analysis of the entire circuit of radiopharmaceuticals from a single tool and meet the expectations of health authorities. This common and validated tool is available to the pharmaceutical community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Hosselet
- Centre hospitalier de Beauvais, avenue Léon-Blum, 60000 Beauvais, France
| | - D Peyronnet
- Radiopharmacien, centre hospito-universitaire de Caen, avenue de la Côte-de-Nacre, 14033 Caen cedex 9, France
| | - M Lamballais
- Centre hospitalier Valenciennes, avenue Désandrouin, 59322 Valenciennes, France
| | - C Smadja
- Radiopharmacien, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20-40, rue Leblanc, 75908 Paris cedex 15, France
| | - A-S Verrey
- Institut de radiophysique, centre hospitalier universitaire Vaudois, rue du Grand-Pré 1, 1007 Lausanne, France
| | - S Tyranowicz
- Centre hospitalier de Sarreguemines, 2, rue René-François-Jolly, BP 50025, 57211 Sarreguemines cedex, France
| | - D Galvez
- Hôpital privé du Confluent, 2-4, rue Éric-Tabarly, 44202 Nantes, France
| | - P Joyes
- Centre hospitalier d'Angoulême, rond-point de Girac CS 55 015 Saint-Michel, 16959 Angouleme cedex 9, France
| | - L Danguy des Deserts
- Centre hospitalier d'Angoulême, rond-point de Girac CS 55 015 Saint-Michel, 16959 Angouleme cedex 9, France
| | - K Félice
- Centre hospitalier René-Dubos, 6, avenue de l'Île-de-France, 95303 Cergy Pontoise cedex, France
| | - S Lancelot
- MCU-PH, hospices civils de Lyon, groupement hospitalier Est, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69677 Bron cedex, France; Centre de recherche en neurosciences de Lyon (UMR 5292, U 1028), Université de Lyon, CNRS, Inserm, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69003 Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Freeman LM, Blaufox MD. Letter from the Editors-May 2018 Issue. Semin Nucl Med 2018; 48:197. [PMID: 29626937 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|