The Peritoneum: What Nuclear Radiologists Need to Know

Intercellular communication in peritoneal dialysis

Long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) causes structural and functional alterations of the peritoneal membrane. Peritoneal deterioration and fibrosis are multicellular and multimolecular processes. Under stimulation by deleterious factors such as non-biocompatibility of PD solution, various cells in the abdominal cavity show differing characteristics, such as the secretion of different cytokines, varying protein expression levels, and transdifferentiation into other cells. In this review, we discuss the role of various cells in the abdominal cavity and their interactions in the pathogenesis of PD. An in-depth understanding of intercellular communication and inter-organ communication in PD will lead to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease, enabling the development of novel therapeutic targets.

Novel Peritoneal Sclerosis Rat Model Developed by Administration of Bleomycin and Lansoprazole

In our preliminary experiment, peritoneal sclerosis likely induced by peritoneal dialysis was unexpectedly observed in the livers of rats given bleomycin and lansoprazole. We examined whether this peritoneal thickening around the liver was time-dependently induced by administration of both drugs. Male Wistar rats were injected with bleomycin and/or lansoprazole for 2 or 4 weeks. The 3YB-1 cell line derived from rat fibroblasts was treated by bleomycin and/or lansoprazole for 24 h. The administration of both drugs together, but not individually, thickened the peritoneal tissue around the liver. There was accumulation of collagen fibers, macrophages, and eosinophils under mesothelial cells. Expressions of Col1a1, Mcp1 and Mcp3 genes were increased in the peritoneal tissue around the liver and in 3YB-1 cells by the administration of both drugs together, and Opn genes had increased expressions in this tissue and 3YB-1 cells. Mesothelial cells indicated immunoreactivity against both cytokeratin, a mesothelial cell marker, and αSMA, a fibroblast marker, around the livers of rats given both drugs. Administration of both drugs induced the migration of macrophages and eosinophils and induced fibrosis associated with the possible activation of fibroblasts and the possible promotion of the mesothelial-mesenchymal transition. This might become a novel model of peritoneal sclerosis for peritoneal dialysis.

Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET/MRI) Versus the Standard of Care Imaging in the Diagnosis of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to the standard of care imaging (SCI) for the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in primary abdominopelvic malignancies.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Identifying PC impacts prognosis and management of multiple cancer types.

METHODS

Adult subjects were prospectively and consecutively enrolled from April 2019 to January 2021. Inclusion criteria were: 1) acquisition of whole-body contrast-enhanced (CE) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI, 2) pathologically confirmed primary abdominopelvic malignancies. Exclusion criteria were: 1) greater than 4 weeks interval between SCI and PET/MRI, 2) unavailable follow-up. SCI consisted of whole-body CE PET/computed tomography (CT) with diagnostic quality CT, and/or CE-CT of the abdomen and pelvis, and/or CE-MRI of the abdomen±pelvis. If available, pathology or surgical findings served as the reference standard, otherwise, imaging followup was used. When SCI and PET/MRI results disagreed, medical records were checked for management changes. Follow-up data were collected until August 2021.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-four subjects were included, 85 (52%) were female, and the median age was 60 years (interquartile range 50-69). At a subject level, PET/MRI had higher sensitivity (0.97, 95% CI 0.86-1.00) than SCI (0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.71), P < 0.001, without a difference in specificity, of 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-0.98) for PET/MRI and 0.98 (95% CI 0.93-1.00) for SCI, P ¼ 0.250. PET/MRI and SCI results disagreed in 19 cases. In 5/19 (26%) of the discordant cases, PET/MRI findings consistent with PC missed on SCI led to management changes.

CONCLUSION

PET/MRI improves detection of PC compared with SCI which frequently changes management.

Mechanisms of Peritoneal Mesothelial Cells in Peritoneal Adhesion

A peritoneal adhesion (PA) is a fibrotic tissue connecting the abdominal or visceral organs to the peritoneum. The formation of PAs can induce a variety of clinical diseases. However, there is currently no effective strategy for the prevention and treatment of PAs. Damage to peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMCs) is believed to cause PAs by promoting inflammation, fibrin deposition, and fibrosis formation. In the early stages of PA formation, PMCs undergo mesothelial–mesenchymal transition and have the ability to produce an extracellular matrix. The PMCs may transdifferentiate into myofibroblasts and accelerate the formation of PAs. Therefore, the aim of this review was to understand the mechanism of action of PMCs in PAs, and to offer a theoretical foundation for the treatment and prevention of PAs.

Nanotechnology for Cancer Imaging: Advances, Challenges, and Clinical Opportunities

Nanoparticle (NP) imaging applications have the potential to improve cancer diagnostics, therapeutics, and treatment management. In biomedical research and clinical practice, NPs can serve as labels or labeled carriers for monitoring drug delivery or serve as imaging agents for enhanced imaging contrast, as well as providing improved signal sensitivity and specificity for in vivo imaging of molecular and cellular processes. These qualities offer exciting opportunities for NP-based imaging agents to address current limitations in oncologic imaging. Despite substantial advancements in NP design and development, very few NP-based imaging agents have translated into clinics within the past 5 years. This review highlights some promising NP-enabled imaging techniques and their potential to address current clinical cancer imaging limitations. Although most examples provided herein are from the preclinical space, discussed imaging solutions could offer unique in vivo tools to solve biologic questions, improve cancer treatment effectiveness, and inspire clinical translation innovation to improve patient care. Keywords: Molecular Imaging-Cancer, Molecular Imaging-Nanoparticles, Molecular Imaging-Optical Imaging, Metastases, Oncology, Surgery, Treatment Effects.