Timing of delivery for women with stable placenta previa

Uncharted territory: a narrative review of parental involvement in decision-making about late preterm and early term delivery

Almost 30% of live births in England and Wales occur late preterm or early term (LPET) and are associated with increased risks of adverse health outcomes throughout the lifespan. However, very little is known about the decision-making processes concerning planned LPET births or the involvement of parents in these. This aim of this paper is to review the evidence on parental involvement in obstetric decision-making in general, to consider what can be extrapolated to decisions about LPET delivery, and to suggest directions for further research.A comprehensive, narrative review of relevant literature was conducted using Medline, MIDIRS, PsycInfo and CINAHL databases. Appropriate search terms were combined with Boolean operators to ensure the following broad areas were included: obstetric decision-making, parental involvement, late preterm and early term birth, and mode of delivery.This review suggests that parents' preferences with respect to their inclusion in decision-making vary. Most mothers prefer sharing decision-making with their clinicians and up to half are dissatisfied with the extent of their involvement. Clinicians' opinions on the limits of parental involvement, especially where the safety of mother or baby is potentially compromised, are highly influential in the obstetric decision-making process. Other important factors include contextual factors (such as the nature of the issue under discussion and the presence or absence of relevant medical indications for a requested intervention), demographic and other individual characteristics (such as ethnicity and parity), the quality of communication; and the information provided to parents.This review highlights the overarching need to explore how decisions about potential LPET delivery may be reached in order to maximise the satisfaction of mothers and fathers with their involvement in the decision-making process whilst simultaneously enabling clinicians both to minimise the number of LPET births and to optimise the wellbeing of women and babies.

Prophylactic uterine artery embolization during cesarean delivery for management of hemorrhage in complete placenta previa: An observational study

Complete placenta previa is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in pregnant women and fetuses. This study aimed to evaluate whether prophylactic uterine artery embolization (PUAE) could reduce bleeding in patients with complete placenta previa. We retrospectively analyzed patients with complete placenta previa admitted to Taixing People's Hospital for elective cesarean delivery between January 2019 and December 2020. The women were treated with PUAE (PUAE group, n = 20) or without (control group, control, n = 20). Risk factors for bleeding (age, gestational age, pregnancy times, delivery times, cesarean delivery times), intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin difference before and after surgery, transfusions volume, hysterectomy cases, major maternal complication cases, neonatal birth weight, neonatal Apgar score in 1 minute, postoperative hospitalization time were compared between 2 groups. There were no significant differences on risk factors for bleeding, neonatal birth weight, neonatal Apgar score in 1 minute, postoperative hospitalization time between 2 groups. However, the intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin before and after operation, transfusion volume in the PUAE group was significantly lower than the control. There was no case of hysterectomy or major maternal complications in both groups. PUAE during cesarean may be an effective and safe strategy to reduce intraoperative blood loss and transfusion volume for patients with complete placenta previa.

Timing of cesarean delivery in women with uncomplicated placenta previa

OBJECTIVE

The optimal timing of an elective cesarean delivery for uncomplicated placenta previa remains controversial. Although the present guidelines recommend an elective cesarean delivery between 36^0/7 and 37^6/7weeks of gestation, data supporting this recommendation does not differentiate in outcomes between elective and emergent delivery, or between women with and without ante-partum hemorrhage. Recommendations regarding optimal timing of delivery are based on the risks and benefits associated with delivery at a certain gestational week, compared with a reference of 38 weeks. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to assess the maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes associated with elective delivery at different gestational weeks from 36^0/7 to 38^6/7weeks compared with expectant management in women with uncomplicated placenta previa.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study in a single tertiary medical center of 251 women with a diagnosis of uncomplicated placenta previa, who delivered between 36^0/7 and 38^6/7weeks of gestation, who delivered at our center between Jan 2011 and Dec 2019. Maternal and neonatal outcomes at each gestational week were compared with expectant management.

RESULTS

At 36^0/7-36^6/7weeks, the rate of composite maternal adverse outcome was similar for elective delivery and expectant management (10.5% vs 7.7%, p = .68). Similarly, at 37^0/7-37^6/7 the rate of composite maternal adverse outcome was comparable for elective cesarean delivery and expectant management (7.2% vs 6.4%, p = .54). Maternal bleeding was the main indication of an urgent cesarean delivery, and account for 86% of urgent cesarean delivery at 36^0/7-36^6/7, 76.4% of urgent cesarean delivery at 37^0/7-37^6/7, and for 70.6% of all urgent cesarean delivery at 38^0/7-38^6/7weeks. This group of women who were delivered due to maternal bleeding had a history of maternal bleeding during 2nd and/or 3rd trimester in 75-92.3% of cases. Composite adverse neonatal outcome was similar for elective cesarean delivery at each gestational age compared with expectant management. The risk for lower 5-min APGAR score and hypoglycemia was higher for newborns that were delivered electively a 36th weeks of gestation compared with expectant management.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the optimal time of delivery for women with an uncomplicated placenta previa is between 38^0/7 and 38^6/7weeks of gestation, especially in women without ante-partum bleeding.

Design of nanomaterials for applications in maternal/fetal medicine

Pregnancy complications are commonplace and the challenges of treatment during pregnancy with few options available pose a risk to the health of both the mother and baby. Patients suffering from conditions such as preeclampsia, placenta accreta, and intrauterine growth restriction have few treatment options apart from emergency caesarean section. Fortunately, researchers are beginning to develop nanomedicine-based therapies that could be utilized to treat conditions affecting the mother, placenta, or fetus to improve the prognosis for mothers and their unborn children. This review summarizes the field's current understanding of nanoparticle biodistribution and therapeutic effect following systemic or vaginal administration and overviews the design parameters researchers should consider when developing nanomedicines for maternal/fetal health. It also describes safety considerations for nanomedicines to limit undesirable maternal or fetal side effects and discusses future work that should be performed to advance nanomedicine for maternal/fetal health. With additional development and implementation, the application of nanomedicine to treat pregnancy complications may mitigate the need for emergency caesarean sections and allow pregnancies to extend to term.

Maternal risk factors associated with persistent placenta previa

INTRODUCTION

Maternal risk factors associated with placenta previa are well documented in the literature. However, there are limited studies identifying maternal characteristics associated with the persistence of placenta previa. The objective of the study was to determine maternal characteristics associated with the persistent placenta previa.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in which 705 pregnant women diagnosed with low-lying placenta or placenta previa between 17 and 24 weeks gestation were identified from a single institution between 2003 and 2017. The primary outcome included persistent placenta previa (i.e., persistent placental tissue within 2 cm of the internal os) at or after 36 weeks 0 days. Those with abnormal placentation (e.g., vasa previa, placenta accreta) or delivery prior to 36 weeks 0 days were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was utilized to determine significant maternal characteristics associated with persistent placenta previa among women diagnosed with either placenta previa or low-lying placenta.

RESULTS

Women with a prior cesarean delivery were seven times more likely to have persistent placenta previa (odds ratio, 7.0, 95% confidence interval, 3.7-13.1). A history of intrauterine curettage or evacuation in the setting of placenta previa increases the likelihood of persistent placenta previa almost 3-fold (odds ratio, 2.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.3-5.0).

DISCUSSION

To date, our study is the largest, retrospective cohort study assessing maternal risk factors associated with persistent placenta previa; and is the first to detect a statistically significant correlation between a history of intrauterine surgeries and persistent placenta previa.

Placenta previa. A 13 years experience at a tertiary care center in Western Saudi Arabia

Objectives:

To review cases of placenta previa in the last 13 years in a tertiary teaching hospital to identify risk factors for maternal morbidity.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis of all cases of placenta previa managed at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia from January 2001 to December 2013.

Results:

The total number of deliveries was 55,862 deliveries, and 11,412 (20.3%) delivered by cesarean section (C/S). The charts of 230 cases diagnosed with placenta previa was reviewed, and different variables were collected and analyzed. Diagnoses were achieved in 94% of them using ultrasound. The prevalence rate of placenta previa was 4.1 per 1000 births. Cesarean section was carried out as an emergency procedure in 130 (56.5%) women and as elective in 100 (43.5%) women. Of them, 26 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (11.3%), all of which received blood transfusion >6 units and 22 patients had a hysterectomy for uncontrollable bleeding.

Conclusion:

Placenta previa is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality. Every hospital must have a protocol, or algorithm for the management of placenta previa. Risk factors for maternal morbidity included complete previa, history of previous C/S, emergency C/S at a gestational age of <36 weeks, and estimated blood loss >2000 ml.

Abnormal Placentation: Placenta Previa, Vasa Previa, and Placenta Accreta

Placental disorders such as placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa are all associated with vaginal bleeding in the second half of pregnancy. They are also important causes of serious fetal and maternal morbidity and even mortality. Moreover, the rates of previa and accreta are increasing, probably as a result of increasing rates of cesarean delivery, maternal age, and assisted reproductive technology. The routine use of obstetric ultrasonography as well as improving ultrasonographic technology allows for the antenatal diagnosis of these conditions. In turn, antenatal diagnosis facilitates optimal obstetric management. This review emphasizes an evidence-based approach to the clinical management of pregnancies with these conditions as well as highlights important knowledge gaps.

Stillbirth reduction efforts and impact on early births

A major justification for the intentional delivery of a pregnancy before 39 weeks' gestation is a reduction in stillbirth. However, there is a considerable downside to late preterm or early term deliveries. Infants born before 39 weeks' gestation are at increased risk for numerous complications and even death. Thus, it is critical to identify which medical problems and circumstances place the fetus at high enough risk for stillbirth so as to justify late preterm or early term birth. This article highlights information pertinent to the pros and cons of iatrogenic preterm birth in pregnancies at risk for stillbirth.