1
|
Odeh AM, Wyant K, Freeman RK, Abdelsattar ZM. Tackling complex thoracic surgical operations with robotic solutions: a narrative review. J Thorac Dis 2024; 16:1521-1536. [PMID: 38505049 PMCID: PMC10944716 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-1570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objective The adoption of robotic surgery for general thoracic surgery has rapidly progressed over the last two decades from its application in basic operations to complex pathologies. As such, the purpose of this narrative review is to highlight the collective experience of tackling complex thoracic surgical operations with minimally invasive robotic solutions. Methods Electronic searches of PubMed were conducted for each subtopic, using specific keywords and inclusion criteria. Once identified, the articles were screened through the abstract, introduction, results and conclusion for relevancy, and included based on a standard narrative review inclusion criteria. Key Content and Findings The role of the robotic approach has increased in thoracic outlet syndrome, chest wall resection, tracheobronchomalacia, airway and sleeve lung surgery, lobectomy after neoadjuvant therapy, complex segmentectomy, giant paraesophageal hernia repair, esophagectomy and esophageal enucleation, mediastinal masses and thymectomy and lung transplantation. Robotic surgery has several advantages when compared to video-assisted and open thoracoscopic surgery. These include better pain control and aesthetic outcome, improved handling of complex anatomy, enhanced access to lymph nodes, and faster recovery rates. Although it is associated with longer operative time, robotic surgery has comparable morbidity rates. Conclusions The robotic approach to complex thoracic problems is safe, effective, and associated with improved patient outcomes. To encourage wider adoption of robotic technology, increased training and expanded research efforts are essential, alongside improved worldwide access to this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayham M. Odeh
- Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Kody Wyant
- Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Richard K. Freeman
- Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Zaid M. Abdelsattar
- Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
- US Department of Veterans Affairs, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zirafa CC, Romano G, Sicolo E, Bagalà E, Manfredini B, Alì G, Castaldi A, Morganti R, Davini F, Fontanini G, Melfi F. Robotic versus Open Surgery in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Evaluation of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:9104-9115. [PMID: 37887558 PMCID: PMC10605396 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30100658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consists of a heterogeneous group, with different pulmonary extension and lymph nodal involvement. Robotic surgery can play a key role in these tumours thanks to its technological features, although open surgery is still considered the gold-standard approach. Our study aims to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of locally advanced NSCLC patients who underwent robotic surgery in a high-volume centre. Data from consecutive patients with locally advanced NSCLC who underwent robotic lobectomy were retrospectively analysed and compared with patients treated with open surgery. Clinical characteristics and surgical and oncological information were evaluated. From 2010 to 2020, 131 patients underwent anatomical lung resection for locally advanced NSCLC. A total of 61 patients were treated with robotic surgery (46.6%); the median hospitalization time was 5.9 days (range 2-27) and the postoperative complication rate was 18%. Open surgery was performed in 70 patients (53.4%); the median length of stay was 9 days (range 4-48) and the postoperative complication rate was 22.9%. The median follow-up time was 70 months. The 5-year overall survival was 34% in the robotic group and 31% in the thoracotomy group. Robotic surgery can be considered safe and feasible not only for early stages but also for the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelina C. Zirafa
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (E.S.); (E.B.); (A.C.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Gaetano Romano
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (E.S.); (E.B.); (A.C.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Elisa Sicolo
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (E.S.); (E.B.); (A.C.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Elena Bagalà
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (E.S.); (E.B.); (A.C.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Beatrice Manfredini
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy;
| | - Greta Alì
- Pathological Anatomy, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.A.); (G.F.)
| | - Andrea Castaldi
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (E.S.); (E.B.); (A.C.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Riccardo Morganti
- Section of Statistics, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Federico Davini
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (E.S.); (E.B.); (A.C.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Gabriella Fontanini
- Pathological Anatomy, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.A.); (G.F.)
| | - Franca Melfi
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (G.R.); (E.S.); (E.B.); (A.C.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berzenji L, Wen W, Verleden S, Claes E, Yogeswaran SK, Lauwers P, Van Schil P, Hendriks JMH. Minimally Invasive Surgery in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Where Do We Stand? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4281. [PMID: 37686557 PMCID: PMC10487098 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last two decades, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has gained popularity as a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) alternative to multi- and uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). With this approach, the surgeon obviates the known drawbacks of conventional MIS, such as the reduced in-depth perception, hand-eye coordination, and freedom of motion of the instruments. Previous studies have shown that a robotic approach for operable lung cancer has treatment outcomes comparable to other MIS techniques such as multi-and uniportal VATS, but with less blood loss, a lower conversion rate to open surgery, better lymph node dissection rates, and improved ergonomics for the surgeon. The thoracic surgeon of the future is expected to perform more complex procedures. More patients will enter a multimodal treatment scheme making surgery more difficult due to severe inflammation. Furthermore, due to lung cancer screening programs, the number of patients presenting with operable smaller lung nodules in the periphery of the lung will increase. This, combined with the fact that segmentectomy is becoming an increasingly popular treatment for small peripheral lung lesions, indicates that the future thoracic surgeons need to have profound knowledge of segmental resections. New imaging techniques will help them to locate these lesions and to achieve a complete oncologic resection. Current robotic techniques exist to help the thoracic surgeon overcome these challenges. In this review, an update of the latest MIS approaches and nodule detection techniques will be given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawek Berzenji
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
- Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Laboratory of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Wen Wen
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
- Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Laboratory of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Stijn Verleden
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
- Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Laboratory of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Erik Claes
- Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Laboratory of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Suresh Krishan Yogeswaran
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
- Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Laboratory of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Patrick Lauwers
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
- Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Laboratory of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Paul Van Schil
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
- Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Laboratory of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Jeroen M. H. Hendriks
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
- Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Laboratory of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sedighim S, Frank MI, Heutlinger O, Lee C, Hachey SJ, Keshava HB. A Systematic Review of Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Cancer after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3908. [PMID: 37568725 PMCID: PMC10417737 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgeries for non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (VATSs) and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (RATSs) have become standard of care for patients needing surgical resection in early stages. The role for neoadjuvant systemic therapy has increased with patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. However, there has been some equipoise over the intraoperative and overall outcomes for these patients. Here, we review the current data regarding outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgical resection after systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or both. METHODS A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies presenting data on patients with NSCLC that underwent neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by minimally invasive surgery was performed assessing complications, conversion rates, and lymph node yield. RESULTS Our search strategy and review of references resulted in 239 publications to screen with 88 full texts assessed and 21 studies included in our final review. VATS had a statistically significant higher lymph node yield in five studies. The reported conversion rates ranged from 0 to 54%. Dense adhesions, bleeding, and difficult anatomy were the most common reported reasons for conversion to open surgeries. The most common complications between both groups were prolonged air leak, arrythmia, and pneumonia. VATS was found to have significantly fewer complications in three papers. CONCLUSIONS The current literature supports VATS as safe and feasible for patients with NSCLC after neoadjuvant systemic treatment. Surgeons should remain prepared to convert to open surgeries in those patients with dense adhesions and bleeding risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaina Sedighim
- Department of General Surgery, Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, 3800 Chapman Ave, Suite, 6200, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Madelyn I. Frank
- Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Orange, CA 92868, USA (O.H.)
| | - Olivia Heutlinger
- Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Orange, CA 92868, USA (O.H.)
| | - Carlin Lee
- Department of General Surgery, Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, 3800 Chapman Ave, Suite, 6200, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Stephanie J. Hachey
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Irvine School of Biological Sciences, University of California, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Hari B. Keshava
- Department of General Surgery, Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, 3800 Chapman Ave, Suite, 6200, Orange, CA 92868, USA
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu S, Li S, Tang Y, Chen R, Qiao G. Minimally invasive surgery vs. open thoracotomy for non-small-cell lung cancer with N2 disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1152421. [PMID: 37324136 PMCID: PMC10265993 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1152421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery [MIS, including robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)] and open thoracotomy (OT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with N2 disease. Methods We searched online databases and studies from the creation of the database to August 2022, comparing the MIS group to the OT group for NSCLC with N2 disease. Study endpoints included intraoperative outcomes [e.g., conversion, estimated blood loss (EBL), surgery time (ST), total lymph nodes (TLN), and R0 resection], postoperative outcomes [e.g., length of stay (LOS) and complication], and survival outcomes [e.g., 30-day mortality, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS)]. We estimated outcomes using random effects meta-analysis to account for studies with high heterogeneity (I2 > 50 or p < 0.05). Otherwise, we used a fixed-effect model. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for binary outcomes and standard mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes. Treatment effects on OS and DFS were described by hazard ratio (HR). Results This systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies on MIS vs. OT for NSCLC with N2 disease included 8,374 patients. Compared to OT, patients that underwent MIS had less estimated blood loss (EBL) (SMD = - 64.82, p < 0.01), shorter length of stay (LOS) (SMD = -0.15, p < 0.01), higher R0 resection rate (OR = 1.22, p = 0.049), lower 30-day mortality (OR = 0.67, p = 0.03), and longer overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.61, P < 0.01). The results showed no statistically significant differences in surgical time (ST), total lymph nodes (TLN), complications, and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups. Conclusion Current data suggest that minimally invasive surgery may provide satisfying outcomes, a higher R0 resection rate, and better short-term and long-term survival than open thoracotomy. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022355712.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Songlin Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shaopeng Li
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Ninth People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yong Tang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rixin Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guibin Qiao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shahin GMM, Vos PPWK, Hutteman M, Stigt JA, Braun J. Robot-assisted thoracic surgery for stages IIB-IVA non-small cell lung cancer: retrospective study of feasibility and outcome. J Robot Surg 2023:10.1007/s11701-023-01549-3. [PMID: 36928749 PMCID: PMC10374818 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01549-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for higher stages non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remains controversial. This study reports the feasibility of RATS in patients with stages IIB-IVA NSCLC. A single-institute, retrospective study was conducted with patients undergoing RATS for stages IIB-IVA NSCLC, from January 2015 until January 2020. Unforeseen N2 disease was excluded. Data were collected from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit database. Conversion rate, radical (R0) resection rate, local recurrence rate and complications were analyzed, as were risk factors for conversion. RATS was performed in 95 patients with NSCLC clinical or pathological stages IIB (N = 51), IIIA (N = 39), IIIB (N = 2) and IVA (N = 3). 10.5% had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Pathological staging was T3 in 33.7% and T4 in 34.7%. RATS was completed in 77.9% with a radical resection rate of 94.8%. Lobectomy was performed in 67.4% of the total resections. Conversion was for strategic (18.9%) and emergency (3.2%) reasons. Pneumonectomy (p = 0.001), squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.001), additional resection of adjacent structures (p = 0.025) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (p = 0.017) were independent risk factors for conversion. Major post-operative complications occurred in ten patients (10.5%) including an in-hospital mortality of 2.1% (n = 2). Median recurrence-free survival was estimated at 39.4 months (CI 16.4-62.5). Two- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 53.8% and 36.7%, respectively. This study concludes that RATS is safe and feasible in higher staged NSCLC tumors after exclusion of unforeseen N2 disease. It brings new perspective on the potential of RATS in higher stages, dealing with larger and more invasive tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghada M M Shahin
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Peter-Paul W K Vos
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Merlijn Hutteman
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jos A Stigt
- Department of Pulmonology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Jerry Braun
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shagabayeva L, Fu B, Panda N, Potter AL, Auchincloss HG, Mansur A, Jeffrey Yang CF, Schumacher L. Open, Video- and Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Stage II-IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 115:184-190. [PMID: 35149049 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compares the short- and long-term outcomes of open vs robotic vs video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for stage II-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS Outcomes of patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC (excluding T4 tumors) who received open and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) lobectomy in the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2017 were assessed using propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS A propensity score-matched analysis of 4652 open and 4652 MIS patients demonstrated a decreased median length of stay associated with MIS compared with open lobectomy (5 vs 6 days; P < .001). There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, or overall survival between the open and MIS groups. A propensity score-matched analysis of 1186 VATS and 1186 robotic patients showed that compared with VATS, the robotic approach was associated with no significant differences in 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and overall survival. However, the robotic group had a decreased median length of stay compared with VATS (4 vs 5 days; P < .001). The conversion rate was also significantly lower for robotic compared with VATS lobectomy (8.9% vs 15.9%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS No significant differences were found in long-term survival between open and MIS lobectomy and between VATS and robotic lobectomy for stage II-IIIA NSCLC. However, the MIS approach was associated with a decreased length of stay compared with the open approach. The robotic approach was associated with decreased length of stay and decreased conversion rate compared with the VATS approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larisa Shagabayeva
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beverly Fu
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nikhil Panda
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexandra L Potter
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hugh G Auchincloss
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Arian Mansur
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Wentworth Douglass Hospital, Dover, New Hampshire
| | - Lana Schumacher
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alwatari Y, Khoraki J, Wolfe LG, Ramamoorthy B, Wall N, Liu C, Julliard W, Puig CA, Shah RD. Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States. JTCVS OPEN 2022; 12:385-398. [PMID: 36590738 PMCID: PMC9801282 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate utilization and perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for lung cancer in the United States using a nationally representative database. METHODS Hospital admissions for lobectomy or sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection) using VATS or RATS in patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer from October 2015 through December 2018 in the National Inpatient Sample were studied. Patient and hospital characteristics, perioperative complications and mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital cost were compared. Logistic regression was used to assess whether the surgical approach was independently associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS There were 83,105 patients who had VATS (n = 65,375) or RATS (n = 17,710) for lobectomy (72.7% VATS) or sublobar resection (84.2% VATS). Utilization of RATS for lobectomy and sublobar resection increased from 19.2% to 34% and 7.3% to 22%, respectively. Mortality, LOS, and conversion rates were comparable. The cost was higher for RATS (P <.01). Multivariate analyses showed comparable RATS and VATS complications with no independent association between the minimally invasive surgery approach used and adverse surgical outcomes, except for a decreased risk of pneumonia with RATS, relative to VATS sublobar resection (P <.01). Thoracic complication rates and LOS decreased after RATS lobectomy in 2018, compared with previous years (P <.005). CONCLUSIONS The utilization of robotic-assisted lung resection for cancer has increased in the United States between 2015 and 2018 for sublobar resection and lobectomy. In adjusted regression analysis, compared with VATS, patients who underwent RATS had similar complication rates and LOS. The robotic approach was associated with increased total hospital cost. LOS and thoracic complication rates trended down after RATS lobectomy.
Collapse
Key Words
- HCUP, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project
- ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision
- ICD-10-CM, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification
- ICD-10-PCS, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision Procedure Coding System
- LOS, length of stay
- MIS, minimally invasive surgery
- NIS, National Inpatient Sample
- Q4, fourth quarter
- RATS, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
- VATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
- lung cancer
- robotic
- video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yahya Alwatari
- Address for reprints: Yahya Alwatari, MD, 1200 E Marshall St, Richmond, VA 23298.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted, Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic and Open Lobectomy for Patients with N1-Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215249. [PMID: 36358668 PMCID: PMC9655678 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Despite the fact that robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (RATL) has been prevalently applied for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its superiorities are still to be fully revealed for patients with metastatic N1 lymph nodes (LNs). We aim to evaluate the advantages of RATL for N1 NSCLC. (2) Methods: This retrospective study identified consecutive pathological N1 NSCLC patients undergoing RATL, video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATL), or open lobectomy (OL) in Shanghai Chest Hospital between 2014 and 2020. Further, perioperative and oncological outcomes were investigated. (3) Results: A total of 855 cases (70 RATL, 435 VATL, and 350 OL) were included. Propensity score matching resulted in 70, 140, and 140 cases in the RATL, VATL, and OL groups, respectively. RATL led to (1) the shortest surgical time (p = 0.005) and lowest intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001); (2) the shortest ICU (p < 0.001) and postsurgical hospital (p < 0.001) stays as well as chest tube duration (p < 0.001); and (3) the lowest morbidities of postsurgical complications (p = 0.016). Moreover, RATL dissected more N1 (p = 0.027), more N1 + N2 (p = 0.027) LNs, and led to a higher upstaging incidence rate (p < 0.050) than VATL. Finally, RATL achieved a comparable 5-year disease-free and overall survival in relation to VATL and OL. (4) Conclusions: RATL led to the most optimal perioperative outcomes among the three surgical approaches and showed superiority in assessing N1 and total LNs over VATL, though it did achieve comparable oncological outcomes in relation to VATL and OL for N1 NSCLC patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Huang J, Tian Y, Li C, Shen Y, Li H, Lv F, Lin H, Lu P, Lin J, Lau C, Terra RM, Jiang L, Luo Q. Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery reduces perioperative complications and achieves a similar long-term survival profile as posterolateral thoracotomy in clinical N2 stage non-small cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2022; 10:4281-4292. [PMID: 35004256 PMCID: PMC8674609 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-21-898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Our previous study demonstrated the safety and short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in clinical N2 (c-N2) stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. From this, the present study was devised, in which the follow-up time and sample size were both extended to explore the long-term efficacy and potential benefit in survival of RATS compared with lobectomy in c-N2 stage NSCLC patients. Methods Patients with c-N2 NSCLS were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to accept operation through thoracotomy or RATS. The da Vinci Surgical System (Si/Xi) was applied in the RATS group, while conventional lobectomy with a rib-spreading incision was applied in the posterolateral thoracotomy group. Primary endpoint was defined as disease free survival and overall survival (OS) of all recruited patients. Results Compared with posterolateral thoracotomy group (N=72), the RATS group (N=76) had a reduced blood loss (P<0.001), decreased drainage duration (P=0.002), and decreased postoperative pain visual analog score (all P<0.001), but increased overall cost (P<0.001). Meanwhile, no difference in the other postoperative complications (such as air leakage, subcutaneous emphysema, atrial fibrillation etc.) was found between the RATS group and the posterolateral thoracotomy group (all P>0.05). Regarding long-term outcome, no difference in disease-free survival (DFS; P=0.925) or OS (P=0.853) was observed between the RATS group and posterolateral thoracotomy group. Subgroup analyses and multivariable Cox regression analyses also found no difference in DFS or OS between the RATS group and posterolateral thoracotomy groups. Conclusions RATS reduced intraoperative bleeding, drainage duration, postoperative pain, and achieved similar long-term survival outcomes compared with posterolateral thoracotomy in c-N2 stage NSCLC patients. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-INR-17012777.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Huang
- Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Tian
- Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chongwu Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yaofeng Shen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hecheng Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Fanzhen Lv
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Huadong Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Lin
- Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Peiji Lu
- Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jules Lin
- Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Christopher Lau
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ricardo Mingarini Terra
- Thoracic Surgery Division, Heart Institute (InCor) do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Long Jiang
- Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingquan Luo
- Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cameron RB. Commentary: Minimally Invasive Surgery in N2 Stage IIIA Lung Cancer: Time for Caution Not Time to Throw Caution to the Wind. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 33:556-557. [PMID: 33197568 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.10.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert B Cameron
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, West Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
David EA. Commentary: I Am Happy to Inform You That Thoracotomy Is No Longer Required for Stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 33:558. [PMID: 33181292 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.10.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A David
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|