Mechanical considerations for deep-bite correction with aligners

How accurate is predicted root movement achieved in four first-premolar extraction cases with Invisalign?

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the achieved and predicted root movements in adults after four first-premolar extractions and Invisalign treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive adults (22 Class I, 9 Cusp-to-cusp Class II and 2 Cusp-to-cusp Class III) from a single clinical division who completed the first series of aligners after premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography model was registered onto the pretreatment surface-scanned dental model (SSDM) to locate the pretreatment root apices of the whole dentition. These were copied and transferred to the predicted and achieved post-treatment SSDMs to acquire the locations of the predicted and achieved post-treatment root apices. The differences between predicted and achieved root movements (DPARMs) were tested using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

In the anteroposterior direction, posterior root movements of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were poorly achieved (3.24-5.74 mm DPARMs, p < .05). In the vertical direction, roots of maxillary anterior teeth achieved greater intrusion (0.70-0.93 mm DPARMs, p < .05), while those of mandibular incisors achieved less intrusion (0.57-0.65 mm DPARMs, p < .05) than predicted. In the mediolateral direction, lateral incisor roots did not move distally (-0.65 to -0.96 mm DPARMs, p < .05), while those of canines did not move buccally, compared with the prediction (-0.75 mm DPARMs, p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the four first-premolar extraction treatments with Invisalign, root movements were not achieved as predicted, particularly for anterior teeth in the anteroposterior direction.

Deep overbite reduction in adolescent patients treated with Invisalign: A retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Data regarding the efficacy of deep overbite correction with clear aligner therapy in adolescent patients are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of deep overbite reduction in adolescent patients treated with Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) aligners.

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated a sample of 102 patients aged 10-17 years from a large database. All patients had completed wear of a prescribed series of Invisalign aligners with planned overbite reduction on a nonextraction basis. The predicted, pretreatment, and posttreatment overbite measurement values were obtained from Align Technology's ClinCheck digital facility. Linear modeling, with Bland-Altman plots, was used to compare the effect of age, the use of bite ramps, and the adoption of the eighth-generational (G8) protocol on the difference between predicted and achieved overbite measurements.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients with a mean ± standard deviation age of 13.94 ± 1.53 years satisfied the selection criteria. A mean ± standard deviation of 41.38 ± 30.43% of the predicted overbite reduction was achieved. There were no differences in the predictability of overbite reduction between patients who were aged <14 years or those aged 14-17 years (P = 0.73), between patients prescribed and not prescribed bite ramps (P = 0.25), or between patients prescribed the G8 protocol and not prescribed the G8 protocol (P = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

The average achieved overbite was less than half of what was planned by the orthodontists via the ClinCheck facility. The age grouping, the provision of bite ramps, and the G8 protocol appear to have little influence on the efficacy of overbite reduction in adolescent patients.

Influence of Invisalign precision bite ramp utilization on deep bite correction and root length in adults

OBJECTIVES

To assess the influence of Invisalign precision bite ramp use on skeletal deep overbite correction and root length and volume of maxillary anterior teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 60 adults with skeletal deep overbite. Patients were divided into three groups: Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) with precision bite ramps (Invisalign with Bite Ramps [IBR] = 12), Invisalign with no bite ramps (INBR = 22), and full-fixed appliances (FFA = 26). Cone beam computed tomography records at T1 (pretreatment) and T2 (posttreatment) were used to measure eight skeletal, nine dental, and three soft-tissue cephalometric variables. Maxillary anterior teeth root length (mm), root volume (mm3), and percent root volume loss between T1 and T2 (%) were also recorded.

RESULTS

Significant changes from T1 to T2 among the three groups were seen in ANB(o), lower face height (%), ODI (overbite depth indicator) (o), and U1-SN (o). Reduction in root length was significantly less (P < .001) in the INBR and IBR groups compared to the FFA group. Reduction in root volume and percent volume loss were significantly higher in the INBR group compared to the IBR group (P < .001), but the difference between the two Invisalign groups and the FFA group was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Skeletal deep overbite correction using Invisalign with or without bite ramps is comparable to FFA. Reduction in root length was significantly less with Invisalign compared to FFA. Bite ramps influenced root volume and volume loss but not root length.

Current Trends in Pediatric Orthodontics: A Comprehensive Review

Pediatric orthodontics is a critical field focusing on the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of dental and facial irregularities in children. This comprehensive review explores current trends and methodologies in pediatric orthodontics and discusses the multifactorial etiology of malocclusions, including genetic, environmental, and disease-related factors. The importance of proper diagnosis is highlighted, and the extraoral, intraoral, and functional evaluations essential for effective treatment planning are detailed. Various orthodontic conditions such as Class III and Class II malocclusions, abnormal oral habits, arch length discrepancies, anterior and posterior crossbites, open bites, and deep bites are examined in depth. The review also addresses the role of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in pediatric patients, emphasizing the need for early and accurate diagnosis to facilitate appropriate intervention. The use of clear aligners in early orthodontic intervention is evaluated given their efficacy and improved patient satisfaction compared to traditional appliances. Additionally, the article discusses the non-advisability of early interception for certain self-correcting malocclusions and the limitations of pediatric orthodontic treatment, including compliance-related issues and the unique anatomical considerations of deciduous dentition. This review aims to provide a detailed understanding of contemporary practices and challenges in pediatric orthodontics, offering insights for clinicians to enhance treatment outcomes and patient care.

Does Invisalign Outperform Fixed Appliance in Treating Vertical Discrepancies?

Aligners became popular among adult patients for their superior aesthetics and comfort in comparison to conventional fixed appliances. It has undergone numerous enhancements over time, allowing it to address more complex malocclusions. Many researchers argued that managing vertical discrepancies is more challenging than addressing anteroposterior issues. This complexity arose from the mechanical requirements for treatment and the required mechanics to prevent relapse. Studies assessing the treatment outcome of anterior open bite closure using clear aligners have yielded conflicting results regarding the mechanisms of bite closure. Proposed mechanisms included extrusion of upper or lower incisors, lingual tipping of upper or lower incisors, intrusion of upper or lower molars, counterclockwise rotation of the mandible, or various combinations of these mechanisms. The research highlighted the biomechanical challenges associated with using aligners for the treatment of deep bites as mandibular incisor intrusion and leveling the curve of Spee remain among the least predictable movements. Given the widespread use of aligners, it is imperative to rigorously assess the effectiveness of clear aligners in achieving overbite correction to ensure they deliver the desired outcome. This review aimed to assess the performance of Invisalign in the management of vertical discrepancies. It sought to identify the dentoskeletal effects of clear aligners in addressing deep bite and anterior open bite cases, understand the mechanisms behind overbite correction, and provide a comprehensive overview of the existing research on this topic.

Unplanned tooth movement in deepbite correction with Invisalign: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate unplanned tooth movements in deepbite correction with Invisalign.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 34 adult patients with deepbite malocclusion treated with Invisalign. Pretreatment and predicted digital models were exported from ClinCheck software, while the post-treatment model was obtained from an intraoral scan taken at the end of the first set of aligners. Digital models' superimposition was done using the eModel "Compare" software. Frequency and percentage of occurrence of unplanned linear and angular movements, their magnitude, and direction were then determined. In addition, comparison of unplanned movements was performed between anterior and posterior teeth as well as between linear and angular measurements.

RESULTS

The percentage of unplanned movements ranged from 1.68% to 25.63% in the maxilla and 3.36% to 23.95% in the mandible, being most evident in the first and second molars. Unplanned movements were statistically significantly more frequent in posterior teeth compared with the anterior teeth (P > 0.05). In addition, the frequency of angular movements was statistically significantly higher for each tooth than linear movement (P < 0.05) with a higher mean value. Unplanned mesiodistal movements were the least frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

Unplanned linear as well as angular movements were evident in almost all teeth. Unplanned faciolingual inclination and mesiodistal angulation movements were the most frequently observed. Unplanned vertical movements can affect the predictability of deepbite correction and thus merit particular attention in those cases.

Does aligner refinement have the same efficiency in deep bite correction?: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Refinements are very common in clear aligner treatments. The aim of this study is to assess whether the predictability of deep overbite correction is similar over several refinements using clear aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) and examine the accuracy of vertical movement and inclination change of individual teeth.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 20 deep bite patients (7M and 13F; 32.63 ± 11.88 years old; an initial overbite of 5.09 ± 0.98 mm), consecutively treated from September 2016 and March 2023, who completed at least two sets of aligners, including refinements. The initial, predicted, and achieved models were exported from ClinCheck or OrthoCAD (Cadent Inc, Carlstadt, NJ) and superimposed via best-fit surface-based registration using SlicerCMF (version 4.9.0; cmf.slicer.org). We also examined 15 out of 20 patients who completed treatments. The overbite correction and changes in vertical movement and inclination for individual teeth were measured. Descriptive statistics and a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test were performed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean accuracy of overbite correction was 37.63% after 1st set, followed by 11.19%, 6.32%, and 13.80% (2nd-4th sets), respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the predicted and achieved vertical movements and inclination changes for all teeth for the 1st and 2nd sets. For the completed cases, the mean overbite correction was 38.54% compared to the initially planned overbite correction, which is similar to one of the 1st set. Still, the vertical movements and inclination changes of all teeth present statistically significant differences between the initially planned and finally achieved movements except for maxillary lateral incisor torque.

CONCLUSIONS

The most overbite correction occurs during the 1st set of aligners, and refinement treatment does not significantly improve the deep bite correction.

Does age influence deep overbite correction with Invisalign? A prospective study evaluating mandibular incisor intrusion in adolescents vs adults

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of mandibular incisor intrusion with Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif) in adolescents to that in adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective clinical study included 58 patients treated with either Invisalign Teen or Invisalign Full. Mandibular central and lateral incisors were measured on digital models created from intraoral scans. Predicted values were determined by superimposing the initial and final ClinCheck models, and achieved values were determined by superimposing the initial ClinCheck models and the digital models from the final scans. Individual teeth were superimposed with a best-fit analysis and measured using Compare software (version 8.1; GeoDigm, Falcon Heights, Minn).

RESULTS

The mean accuracies of mandibular incisor intrusion were 63.5% in adolescents and 45.3% in adults, and this difference was statistically significant. The amounts of achieved intrusion were 1.7 mm in adolescents and 0.9 mm in adults, and this difference was also statistically significant. Overall, there was a weak negative correlation between age and accuracy; as age advanced, the accuracy of mandibular incisor intrusion diminished slightly.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandibular incisor intrusion with Invisalign is significantly more accurate in adolescents than in adults. Orthodontists could contemplate reducing the degree of overcorrection for mandibular incisor intrusion in adolescents with deep overbites undergoing Invisalign Teen but still implementing the reverse curve of Spee mechanics.

Predictability of the deep overbite correction using clear aligners

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to investigate the predictability of overbite correction in patients with deepbite using the clear aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) and examine the accuracy of vertical movement and inclination change of individual teeth.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 24 deepbite patients (10 males and 14 females; aged 32.8 ± 11.9 years; an initial overbite of 5.20 ± 0.95 mm; an average treatment period of 11.04 ± 4.14 months) consecutively treated from September 2016 and completed before August 2021. SmartTrack materials were used for all patients. The initial, predicted, and achieved final models were exported from ClinCheck and superimposed via best-fit surface-based registration using Slicer CMF (version 4.9.0; cmf.slicer.org). The overbite correction, changes in vertical movement, and inclination for individual teeth were measured. Descriptive statistics and a paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test were performed. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Mean overbite correction was 33%, with a 1.15 mm improvement after the first set of aligners. All teeth demonstrated statistically significant differences between planned and achieved amounts in vertical movement and inclination change, with the largest difference in maxillary central incisors. Mandibular incisor intrusion and mandibular premolar extrusion had similar accuracies. Regarding inclination change, maxillary central incisors showed the lowest accuracy of 13.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Clear aligner treatment showed an average of 33% overbite correction. Overcorrection and additional refinement treatments are needed in most patients with a deepbite.

Treatment of Class III Malocclusion and Anterior Crossbite with Aligners: A Case Report

The article describes the orthodontically treated case of a 25-year-old patient with skeletal and dental class III malocclusion, anterior crossbite, which caused functional and aesthetic problems, occlusal trauma, and incisor wear. Treatment with transparent aligners was proposed to meet the patient's needs, using the sequential distalization protocol. While sequential distalization is well documented for class II malocclusion treatment in maxillary arch teeth, further investigations are necessary for class III malocclusions. In fact, lower teeth movements are more complex due to mandibular bone density and the presence of the third molars, which are often extracted to perform distalization. In addition, the use of intermaxillary elastics helps control the proclination of the anterior teeth as a reaction to distalizing forces. At the end of the treatment, the patient reached molar and canine class I and positive overjet and overbite. The inclination of lower incisors and the interincisal angle have improved, resulting in aesthetic and functional enhancement.

Essential Attributes of Clear Aligner Therapy in terms of Appliance Configuration, Hygiene, and Pain Levels during the Pandemic: A Brief Review

Fixed orthodontic treatment has been compromised at many levels during the pandemic period, as clinics underwent a prolonged lockdown and patients could not be treated regularly. With the end of the pandemic nowhere in sight, may be it is time to put newer tools, such as clear aligner therapy, for better use. Fixed orthodontic appliances by nature are not always self-limiting, which, if left unmonitored over a long period may cause undesirable side effects, pain, and discomfort. The undesired tooth movements that may occur with arch wire-guided mechanics in addition to problems with cut wires or removed brackets may be minimized with the use of aligners. While the benefits of using aligners are for all to see, they do require extensive planning and careful evaluation of the progress. This article reviews the advantages of using aligners during the pandemic period and how it can be beneficial in helping orthodontists resume their practice.