Imaging of the postoperative spine

SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Suspected Skeletal Pathology

Dedicated multi-slice single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) cameras have become widely available and are becoming a mainstay of clinical practice. The integration of SPECT and CT allow for precise anatomic location of scintigraphic findings. Fusion imaging with SPECT/CT can improve both sensitivity and specificity by reducing equivocal interpretation in comparison to planar scintigraphy or SPECT alone. This review article addresses the technique, basic science principles, and applications of integrated SPECT/CT in the evaluation of musculoskeletal pathology.

Bone SPECT/CT in Postoperative Spine

Back pain is a common problem and the diagnosis and treatment depend on the clinical presentation, yet overlap between pain syndromes is common. Imaging of patients with chronic back pain in both pre- and postoperative scenarios include radiological, radionuclide, and hybrid techniques. In general, these techniques have their own advantages and limitations. The aim of surgery is to eliminate pathologic segmental motion and accompanying symptoms, especially pain. However, surgical procedures are not without complications and localizing the cause of the pain is often challenging. Radiobisphosphonate bone SPECT/CT is reported to be useful in evaluating benign orthopedic conditions and it often provides valuable information such as accurate localization and characterization of bone abnormalities. In this review, routinely used spinal surgical techniques and procedures are discussed, as well as the acute and delayed complications related to spinal surgery, the role of conventional imaging, and the potential uses of radionuclide bone SPECT/CT to diagnose pseudoarthrosis, cage subsidence, loosening and misalignment, hardware failure, and postoperative infection.

Quantifying metal-induced susceptibility artifacts of the instrumented spine at 1.5T using fast-spin echo and 3D-multispectral MRI

PURPOSE

To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts near metallic spinal instrumentation using both conventional metal artifact reduction sequences (MARS) and 3D multispectral imaging sequences (3D-MSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both MARS and 3D-MSI images were acquired in 10 subjects with titanium spinal hardware on a 1.5T GE 450W scanner. Clinical computed tomography (CT) images were used to measure the volume of the implant using seed-based region growing. Using 30-40 landmarks, the MARS and 3D-MSI images were coregistered to the CT images. Three independent users manually segmented the artifact volume from both MR sequences. For five L-spine subjects, one user independently segmented the nerve root in both MARS and 3D-MSI images.

RESULTS

For all 10 subjects, the measured artifact volume for the 3D-MSI images closely matched that of the CT implant volume (absolute error: 4.3 ± 2.0 cm³ ). The MARS artifact volume was ∼8-fold higher than that of the 3D-MSI images (30.7 ± 20.2, P = 0.002). The average nerve root volume for the MARS images was 24 ± 7.3% lower than the 3D-MSI images (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Compared to 3D-MSI images, the higher-resolution MARS images may help study features farther away from the implant surface. However, the MARS images retained substantial artifacts in the slice-dimension that result in a larger artifact volume. These artifacts have the potential to obscure physiologically relevant features, and can be mitigated with 3D-MSI sequences. Hence, MR study protocols may benefit with the inclusion both MARS and 3D-MSI sequences to accurately study pathology near the spine.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:51-58.

Imaging of lumbar spinal surgery complications

Abstract

Lumbar spine surgery for spinal stenosis is a frequently performed procedure and was the fastest growing type of surgery in the US from 1980 to 2000. With increasing surgical invasiveness, postoperative complications also tend to be higher. Cross-sectional imaging techniques (CT and MRI) are more sensitive than radiographs and play an increasingly important role in evaluation of patients with lumbar spine surgery. Their use in patients with metallic implants is somewhat limited by artefacts, which can obscure pathology and decrease accuracy and reader confidence. Metal artefact reduction techniques have been developed, which can significantly improve image quality and enable early detection of postoperative complications. Complications can occur throughout postoperative course. Early complications include hardware displacement, incidental durotomy, postoperative collections—most commonly seroma, and less likely haematoma and/or infection. Incidental durotomy with CSF leak causing intracranial hypotension has characteristic MR brain findings and diagnosis of occult leak sites have been improved with use of dynamic CT myelography. Haematomas, even when compressing the thecal sac, are usually asymptomatic. Early infection, with nonspecific MR findings, can be diagnosed accurately using dual radiotracer studies. Delayed complications include loosening, hardware failure, symptomatic new or recurrent disc herniation, peri-/epidural fibrosis, arachnoiditis, and radiculitis.

Teaching Points

• CT and MRI play an increasingly important role in evaluation of patients with lumbar spine surgery

• Complications can occur throughout the postoperative course and early detection is critical

• Artefact reduction techniques can improve image quality for early and improved detection of complications

[Profile of the patient with failed back surgery syndrome in the National Institute of Rehabilitation. Comparative analysis]

BACKGROUND

Failed back surgery syndrome is a complication of spine surgery that leads to chronic pain and disability, often with disastrous emotional consequences to the patient.

AIM

To compare the profile of patients whose first surgery was performed in our hospital versus a group that underwent first spine surgery in a different centre.

METHODS

Retrospective study with 65 patients; 18 formed group I (first spine surgery performed in our institution), and 47 patients in group II (first surgery performed in another hospital). Background, demographic, clinical features and functional status were compared. In group I the majority of the cases had a previous diagnosis of lumbar stenosis (group I 44.4% vs group II 25.5% p = 0.22), whereas disk herniation was the main diagnosis in group II (group I 22.2% vs group II 61.7% p = 0.001). The main cause of the syndrome in group I was technical error during surgery (61.1%), while in group II this cause represented only 6.3% (p=.001). Among the patients of this latter group, misdiagnosis was highly prevalent (57.4%), against no cases in group I (p=.001). The preoperative functional status between both groups and their recovery in the immediate postoperative period was similar (p = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the diagnostic and treatment standards are different between healthcare centres, specifically between academic centres vs. private practice.

Imaging of lumbar spine fusion

This article reviews the imaging of lumbar spinal fusion and its major indications. The most common procedures are described for the purpose of allowing understanding of postoperative imaging. Imaging options are reviewed for preoperative workup, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative purposes. Examples of hardware integrity, fusion, and loosening are provided.

Screening for neuropathic characteristics in failed back surgery syndromes: challenges for guiding treatment

OBJECTIVE

Neuropathic pain screening tools have shown promise in identifying common neuropathic pain characteristics that derive from diverse etiologies (e.g., diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia). However, no prior studies have specifically assessed whether these tools are capable of discerning the underlying pain mechanisms in the vast, heterogeneous group of patients diagnosed with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS).

DESIGN

In this clinical observational study, two tests for neuropathic pain characteristics, the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 (DN4) and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) questionnaires, were performed on 43 subjects with FBSS. Subjects underwent physical or neurosensory exam components of the DN4 and LANSS in the region of most severe pain (e.g., axial low back or lower extremities). DN4 and LANSS scores were correlated with clinical history and neurologic exam, pain-related quality of life questionnaires, and compared to an independent assessment of pain distribution.

RESULTS

The presence of neuropathic characteristics, determined by the DN4 (62% sensitivity, 44% specificity), LANSS (38% sensitivity, 75% specificity; cut-offs of 4 and 12, respectively), or their combination (20% sensitivity, 58% specificity) was associated with higher pain intensity as measured by the visual analog scale (DN4 > 4, P = 0.001; LANSS ≥ 12, P = 0.042), modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (DN4 > 4, P = 0.001; LANSS ≥ 12, P = 0.082), and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (DN4 > 4, P = 0.001; LANSS ≥ 12, P = 0.001), and greater pain-related functional impairment as measured by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (DN4 > 4, P = 0.006; LANSS ≥ 12, P = 0.018). The percentage of subjects characterized as neuropathic by the DN4 and LANSS lacked concordance (67.4 vs. 25.6), and the distribution of most severe symptoms (i.e., axial vs radicular) did not correlate with subjects determined to have neuropathic pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike other neuropathic syndromes, the neuropathic component of FBSS is less reliably identified by the LANSS and DN4.

Routine postoperative imaging early after lumbar decompression surgery: a prospective evaluation

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the value of routine postoperative magnetic resonance imaging early after lumbar decompression in patients with nonspecific symptoms.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Imaging after lumbar surgery may be performed more readily in patients even with nonspecific symptoms and without neurological deficit.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery completed standardized questionnaires, were assessed neurologically on admission, and underwent magnetic resonance scanning within 72 hours after surgery. Residual stenosis was graded as absent or mild (outcome A) or moderate to severe (outcome B). Surgical technique and intraoperative complications and postoperative neurological status were recorded.

RESULTS

We recruited 28 consecutive patients who reported significant improvement in preoperative symptoms. In two-thirds of all patients, postoperative images showed at least one segment with moderate or severe residual stenosis (outcome B). Radiological outcome did not correlate with postoperative pain. Patient satisfaction index was comparable in groups A and B. The cross section of the spinal canal was significantly wider with a drain in situ. This did not, however, translate into a difference in overall visual analogue scale score or wound discomfort. Patients tended to report more back and leg pain with drains and were less satisfied with the result of the operation.

CONCLUSION

Early postoperative magnetic resonance scans in patients with nonspecific symptoms frequently show radiologically relevant stenosis, which is associated with neither outcome nor patient satisfaction. Drain placement is associated with less radiological narrowing but with lower patient satisfaction. Imaging without clinical correlate may yield nondiscriminatory information likely to unsettle and puzzle both patients and health care providers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Evaluation of the postoperative lumbar spine

Given the prevalence of low back pain, surgical interventions on the lumbar spine are becoming more common. Among the many surgical procedures available for these interventions, the most common are laminectomy and discectomy. In 10 to 40% of patients who undergo surgical interventions on the lumbar spine, low back pain is not completely alleviated or it recurs, and these cases fall into the category of « failed back surgery syndrome ». This syndrome can have many different causes and multiple factors are often involved. It is important not to confuse the normal postoperative findings with those specific to failed back surgery syndrome. Deciding which imaging technique to use will depend on the type of surgical intervention, whether metallic orthopedic material was used, and the clinical suspicion. It is essential to know the advantages and limitations of the available imaging techniques to ensure the optimal evaluation of these patients, especially after interventions carried out with instrumentation to minimize the artifacts due to these materials.

When is a spine fused?

The ability to correctly diagnose spinal non-union is vital to our ability to diagnose and treat patients with new or recurrent symptoms following spine fusion and to accurately assess the efficacy of spine fusion techniques and technologies. Surgical exploration has traditionally been the gold-standard investigation for spinal non-union. As routine surgical exploration is impractical in the majority of patients the use of non-invasive radiologic methods of spine fusion assessment is necessary. The purpose of this paper is to outline the most common radiologic methods of spine fusion assessment including the strengths and limitations associated with each imaging modality. In addition we will review the best-available evidence for the use of radiologic investigations to diagnose spine non-unions. We will then provide recommendations for what we believe to be the best methods of diagnosing successful union of cervical interbody, lumbar interbody and lumbar posterolateral fusions that can be used by spine clinicians and researchers alike.

Symptomatic nerve root changes on contrast-enhanced MR imaging after surgery for lumbar disk herniation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The significance of postoperative nerve root changes (enhancement, thickening, and displacement) is still a topic of debate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between nerve root changes and residual or recurrent symptoms after lumbar surgery with contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 120 patients with 140 postoperative lumbar disk lesions causing residual or recurrent pain underwent contrast-enhanced MR imaging. The levels at which diskectomies had been performed were retrospectively evaluated for nerve root enhancement (NRE), thickening, and displacement. Association between nerve root changes and corresponding clinical presentations were statistically assessed. Nerve root changes in recurrent disk herniation (RDH) and postoperative epidural fibrosis (PEF) were also evaluated with clinical symptoms.

RESULTS

Ninety-two (65.7%) of the 140 disks demonstrated NRE. Regarding the association with clinical symptoms, the sensitivity was 91.7%, the specificity was 73.2%, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 83.7%, and the negative predictive value was 85.4% (P = .000). Nerve root thickening and displacement were significantly associated with the clinical symptoms, especially when NRE was combined (PPV, 87.7% and 87.2%, respectively). When RDH was combined with all 3 nerve root changes, the PPV was increased up to 94.1%. However, in PEF, the association between nerve root changes and clinical symptoms was not significant unless all 3 nerve root changes were combined.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with residual or recurrent pain after surgery for lumbar disk herniation, nerve root changes on contrast-enhanced MR imaging were well associated with clinical symptoms, of which NRE was the most significant finding.

Multichannel CT: evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopedic hardware

Evaluating the spine in patients with metal orthopedic hardware is challenging. Although the effectiveness of conventional computed tomography (CT) can be limited by severe beam-hardening artifacts, the evolution of multichannel CT in recent years has made available new techniques that can help minimize these artifacts. Multichannel CT allows faster scanning times, resulting in reduced motion artifacts; thinner sections, with which it is possible to create a scanned volume of isotropic voxels with equivalent image resolution in all planes; and the generation of a higher x-ray tube current, which may result in better penetration of metal hardware and reduction of artifacts. Although 140 kVp and high milliamperage-second exposure are recommended for imaging patients with hardware, caution should always be exercised, particularly in children, young adults, and patients undergoing multiple examinations. The acquisition of multiplanar reformatted images in the axial, sagittal, coronal, and oblique planes and of three-dimensional volume-rendered images optimizes image interpretation. Wide window settings are best for reviewing images when hardware is present. The integrity of hardware is best assessed with multiplanar average intensity projection. Soft-tissue structures are best visualized by interactively varying the window width and level settings. Implementation of these techniques can yield diagnostic-quality images and aid in patient treatment.