1
|
Lim G, Soens M, Wanaselja A, Chyan A, Carvalho B, Landau R, George RB, Klem ML, Osmundson SS, Krans EE, Terplan M, Bateman BT. A Systematic Scoping Review of Peridelivery Pain Management for Pregnant People With Opioid Use Disorder: From the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology and Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine. Anesth Analg 2022; 135:912-925. [PMID: 36135926 PMCID: PMC9588509 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The prevalence of pregnant people with opioid use disorder (OUD), including those receiving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), is increasing. Challenges associated with pain management in people with OUD include tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and risk for return to use. Yet, there are few evidence-based recommendations for pain management in the setting of pregnancy and the postpartum period, and many peripartum pain management studies exclude people with OUD. This scoping review summarized the available literature on peridelivery pain management in people with OUD, methodologies used, and identified specific areas of knowledge gaps. PubMed and Embase were comprehensively searched for publications in all languages on peripartum pain management among people with OUD, both treated with MOUD and untreated. Potential articles were screened by title, abstract, and full text. Data abstracted were descriptively analyzed to map available evidence and identify areas of limited or no evidence. A total of 994 publications were imported for screening on title, abstracts, and full text, yielding 84 publications identified for full review: 32 (38.1%) review articles, 14 (16.7%) retrospective studies, and 8 (9.5%) case reports. There were 5 randomized controlled trials. Most studies (64%) were published in perinatology (32; 38.1%) journals or anesthesiology (22; 26.2%) journals. Specific areas lacking trial or systematic review evidence include: (1) methods to optimize psychological and psychosocial comorbidities relevant to acute pain management around delivery; (2) alternative nonopioid and nonpharmacologic analgesia methods; (3) whether or not to use opioids for severe breakthrough pain and how best to prescribe and monitor its use after discharge; (4) monitoring for respiratory depression and sedation with coadministration of other analgesics; (5) optimal neuraxial analgesia dosing and adjuncts; and (6) benefits of abdominal wall blocks after cesarean delivery. No publications discussed naloxone coprescribing in the labor and delivery setting. We observed an increasing number of publications on peripartum pain management in pregnant people with OUD. However, existing published works are low on the pyramid of evidence (reviews, opinions, and retrospective studies), with a paucity of original research articles (<6%). Opinions are conflicting on the utility and disutility of various analgesic interventions. Studies generating high-quality evidence on this topic are needed to inform care for pregnant people with OUD. Specific research areas are identified, including utility and disutility of short-term opioid use for postpartum pain management, role of continuous wound infiltration and truncal nerve blocks, nonpharmacologic analgesia options, and the best methods to support psychosocial aspects of pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Lim
- University of Pittsburgh Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
- University of Pittsburgh Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, UPMC Magee-Women’s Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Mieke Soens
- Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Anne Wanaselja
- University of Pittsburgh Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Arthur Chyan
- Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Brendan Carvalho
- Stanford University Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Ruth Landau
- Columbia University Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, New York City, NY
| | - Ronald B. George
- University of California San Francisco Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mary Lou Klem
- University of Pittsburgh Health Sciences Library System, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sarah S. Osmundson
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Nashville, TN
| | - Elizabeth E. Krans
- University of Pittsburgh Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, UPMC Magee-Women’s Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Brian T. Bateman
- Stanford University Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Opioid dependence is an epidemic in the United States, and the percentage of pregnant women who are opioid dependent has increased dramatically in the last decade. Pain management, already a concern for intrapartum and postpartum care, is complicated in the context of opioid dependence. This clinical review surveys the literature on pain management in opioid-dependent pregnant women to summarize current consensus and evidence to guide clinical practice. Points of consensus for pain management in opioid-dependent pregnant women include continual opioid maintenance therapy throughout the pregnancy and the postpartum period; adequate management of acute pain; the contraindication of opioid agonist-antagonists for pain management; and the need for interdisciplinary teams using a multimodal approach to provide optimal care to opioid-dependent pregnant women.
Collapse
|