Appropriateness and timing of kidney and/or pancreas transplants in type 1 and type 2 diabetes

Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Syndrome Rather Than a Single Disease

The term "diabetic kidney" has recently been proposed to encompass the various lesions, involving all kidney structures that characterize protean kidney damage in patients with diabetes. While glomerular diseases may follow the stepwise progression that was described several decades ago, the tenet that proteinuria identifies diabetic nephropathy is disputed today and should be limited to glomerular lesions. Improvements in glycemic control may have contributed to a decrease in the prevalence of glomerular lesions, initially described as hallmarks of diabetic nephropathy, and revealed other types of renal damage, mainly related to vasculature and interstitium, and these types usually present with little or no proteinuria. Whilst glomerular damage is the hallmark of microvascular lesions, ischemic nephropathies, renal infarction, and cholesterol emboli syndrome are the result of macrovascular involvement, and the presence of underlying renal damage sets the stage for acute infections and drug-induced kidney injuries. Impairment of the phagocytic response can cause severe and unusual forms of acute and chronic pyelonephritis. It is thus concluded that screening for albuminuria, which is useful for detecting "glomerular diabetic nephropathy", does not identify all potential nephropathies in diabetes patients. As diabetes is a risk factor for all forms of kidney disease, diagnosis in diabetic patients should include the same combination of biochemical, clinical, and imaging tests as employed in non-diabetic subjects, but with the specific consideration that chronic kidney disease (CKD) may develop more rapidly and severely in diabetic patients.

Donor-dependent risk factors for early surgical complications after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The success of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) depends in a large degree on avoidance of surgical complications in the early postoperative period. The aim of the study was to analyze the Pre-procurement Pancreas Allocation Suitability Score (P-PASS) and the deceased donor parameters included within it as risk factors for early surgical complications after SPK.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-six consecutive donors whose kidney and pancreas were simultaneously transplanted were included in the study.

RESULTS

Donor age was older among recipients who lost their pancreatic grafts: 30.4±6.9 versus 24.1±6.9 years. Donor age was also older among recipients who lost their pancreatic grafts or died compared with those discharged with a functioning graft: 29.3±5.7 versus 24.0±6.9 years. Donor body mass index (BMI) was higher among patients who died compared with those who were discharged: 25.3±1.1 versus 23.2±2.5 kg/m2. P-PASS was higher in patients who lost their pancreatic grafts (17.6±2.1 vs 15.2±1.8) or died (15.3±1.9 vs 17.2±1.9), or lost pancreatic graft or died (15.2±1.8 vs 17.0±2.2) or with intra-abdominal infections (IAI; 17.1±1.7 vs 15.0±1.8). The incidence of donors≥30 years old was higher among recipients with IAI (45.4% vs 14.3%; P=.04). An higher rate of donors with P-PASS>16 was revealed among patients who lost their pancreatic grafts (26.7% vs 3.2%), died (26.7% vs 3.2%), lost the pancreatic graft or died (33.3% vs 6.4%), or experienced IAI (46.7% vs 9.7%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed P-PASS (odds ratio 2.57; P=.014) and serum sodium (odds ration, 0.91; P=.048) to be important predictors of IAI development.

CONCLUSION

Older age and higher BMI among deceased donors increased the risk of IAI, pancreatic graft loss, or recipient death after SPK. Transplantation of a pancreas from a donor with a low P-PASS score was associated with a lower risk of surgical complications after SPK.

Early morbidity after pancreas transplantation

This study aims to evaluate and compare the early outcome of both pancreas-alone transplantation (PTA) and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPKT) focusing on the complications affecting the first month after the procedures. The records of all patients who underwent PTA or SPKT were reviewed. We considered the length of ICU stay, the need for postoperative ventilatory support, hemodynamic and metabolic data (arterial pH, serum glucose, need for exogenous insulin), infectious diseases incidence, microbiological colonization rate and any kind of postoperative complication arising during the first month after the transplantation. PTA recipients underwent a quicker surgery (P < 0.01) with shorter ICU stay (P < 0.05) and a lower need for postoperative mechanical ventilation (P < 0.05). They also had a higher hemodynamic stability (P < 0.05) with less cardiological complications (P < 0.05) in the intra- and postoperative phases; bacterial colonisation was also less frequent in PTA recipients (P < 0.05). On the contrary, no significant difference was noted with regard to postoperative nausea/vomiting, sudden myocardial death, ICU re-admissions, graft function, rate of rejection, grafts explantation and re-transplantation. PTA could be considered as preemptive for severe diabetic complications in patients with long-lasting severe type I diabetes. However, establishing the correct timing of PTA is of paramount importance in order not to expose the patients early to risks arising from a major surgery and heavy immunosuppressive treatments.

Multivariate Analysis of Factors Affecting Patient and Graft Survival After Renal Transplant

AIM

To evaluate factors affecting patient and kidney survival after renal transplant.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Among 361 patients undergoing renal transplant: 52% (n = 189) were simultaneous with pancreas transplant (SPKT group) and 48% (n = 172), a kidney transplant alone (KT group). Out of 361 patients, 75% (n = 270) were diabetics. The patients were 220 (61%) men and 141 (39%) women of mean age 41 +/- 9 years. The mean time of dialysis was 42 +/- 21 months (range 0 to 126), and the mean duration of diabetes 24 +/- 7 years (range 5 to 51). A Cox regression analysis was done.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis revealed that in the final model diabetes and donor age were significant predictors of kidney graft survival; moreover, diabetes and recipient age were predictors of patient survival. Overall patient survival was significantly greater among nondiabetic patients (P = .002) or in diabetic patients who received SPKT, when compared with diabetics in whom only the kidney was transplanted (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes and donor age were independent prognostic factors affecting kidney graft survival after renal transplant, and recipient age and diabetes were prognostic factors affecting patient survival. Combined pancreas and kidney transplantation should be offered to patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus: risk factors, frequency of transplant rejections, and long-term prognosis

BACKGROUND

Estimates of the incidence of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation vary between 2% and 54%. It was the aim of the present trial to study the prevalence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (DM), the risk factors, the frequency of transplant rejections, and the long-term prognosis.

METHODS

We studied all consecutive patients with endstage renal disease, but without DM who received kidney transplantation at our center since 1992 (n = 253; age, 52.2 +/- 12.6 years; body mass index, 22.0 +/- 7.9 kg/m2). Follow up was 3.3 +/- 1.6 years (range, 0.1-17.7) years.

RESULTS

In total, 43/253 patients (17%) developed new-onset DM after transplantation. Patients with new-onset diabetes were significantly older (58.3 +/- 11.4 vs 50.9 +/- 12.5 years; P < 0.01) and had a tendency to a higher body mass index (24.0 +/- 8.5 vs 21.6 +/- 7.8 kg/m2; P = 0.077). There were no differences between the groups in respect of blood pressure control (137.7 +/- 19.0/81.8 +/- 14.2 vs 137.1 +/- 21.9/83.9 +/- 13.1 mmHg; P = 0.89/0.39), glomerular filtration rate (58.0 +/- 28.1 vs 64.1 +/- 22.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P = 0.13), steroid dosage (4.5 +/- 1.2 [n = 21] vs 4.6 +/- 2.2 [n = 135] mg/day; P = 0.13), or the frequency and dosage of immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus during the follow up. However, more patients with post-transplant diabetes received steroids (83.7% vs 64.3%; P = 0.021) and azathioprine (41.9% vs 24.3%; P = 0.030). Patients with new-onset diabetes had higher serum creatinine values (163.4 +/- 67.9 vs 138.7 +/- 59.5 micromol/l; P = 0.017). The mean hemoglobin (Hb)A1c in patients with DM was 6.28 +/- 1.29% (Tosho HPLC; mean normal, 5.15%). In 18 patients (7.1%) transplant rejections occurred (16 patients without DM [7.6%] vs 2 patients with new-onset DM [4.7%]; P = 0.39). On performing multivariate analysis, the only parameter found to be associated with new-onset DM was the body mass index (R2 = 0.05; beta = 0.23; P = 0.02), and the only factor associated with transplant rejection was fasting blood glucose (R2 = 0.07; beta = 0.28; P = 0.02). None of the other parameters included in the models (age, duration after transplantation, diabetes duration, immunosuppressive therapy, HbA1c, HLA mismatches) showed any associations.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of new-onset DM after renal transplantation was 17%. The most important parameter associated with new-onset diabetes was a higher body mass index, and the most important parameter associated with transplant rejection was an elevated fasting blood glucose level. To prevent transplant rejections and to improve patients' outcome, in addition to providing optimal immunosuppressive therapy and HLA matching, good blood pressure control and HbA1c, but also near normal fasting blood glucose levels, should be achieved.