A randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of 12-month famciclovir treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B

Famciclovir: a focus on efficacy and safety

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Famciclovir is the prodrug of penciclovir, a guanosine analogue that inhibits viruses of the alpha sub-family of the Herpesviridae, as well as hepatitis B virus. It is indicated for management of mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus disease and acute herpes zoster, and has been investigated for management of hepatitis B virus infection.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Data for this review were identified by searches of papers published in English on Medline and Scopus, spanning the years 1975 through 1 February 2010 with the key words: 'famciclovir', 'famvir', 'penciclovir', 'herpes', 'oral', 'genital', 'varicella', 'zoster' and 'virus' in association with 'safety', 'toxicity', 'tolerability', 'efficacy' and 'indications'. Relevant references were also obtained from articles acquired through the search strategy.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Readers are also provided with up-to-date information on the use of famciclovir for infections due to herpes simplex, varicella zoster and hepatitis B viruses. Clinical data pertaining to the safety and tolerability of famciclovir are also reviewed.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Famciclovir is a safe, convenient, and well-tolerated drug when used for its approved indications. The most common side effects indicated in the majority of studies were headache and nausea. Data for its use in childhood and pregnancy are limited.

Single-dose, patient-initiated famciclovir: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial for episodic treatment of herpes labialis

BACKGROUND

The brief period of viral replication in recurrent herpes labialis lesions suggests shorter therapeutic regimens are a logical episodic treatment strategy.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of single-dose and single-day famciclovir treatments.

METHODS

In all, 701 randomly assigned patients self-initiated therapy with famciclovir (1500 mg once [single dose] or 750 mg twice a day for 1 day [single day]) or placebo within 1 hour of onset of the prodromal symptoms of an episode of herpes labialis. Lesion healing was monitored by diaries and frequent clinic visits.

RESULTS

Median healing times of primary (first to appear) vesicular lesions in the famciclovir single-dose, famciclovir single-day, and placebo groups were 4.4, 4.0, and 6.2 days, respectively. There was no significant difference between the famciclovir regimens. Adverse events in the famciclovir groups were similar to placebo.

LIMITATIONS

The active arms of this trial were not directly compared to other antiviral regimens.

CONCLUSION

Single-dose famciclovir reduced time to healing of herpes labialis lesions by approximately 2 days compared with placebo.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels and the management of HBV-infected health care workers

Different guidelines exist for the management of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected health care workers (HCWs). Various HBV DNA levels are used as a cutoff level to determine whether an HBV-infected HCW is allowed to perform exposure-prone procedures (EPPs) or not. In this paper we discuss the factors that determine HBV DNA levels and the implications of different HBV DNA cutoff levels for EPP performing HCWs. If the level of HBV DNA in the serum of HCWs is used to determine acceptability for the conduct of EPPs, it is necessary to take into account the variability in time of HBV DNA levels in HBV carriers and the reliability and reproducibility of the molecular diagnostic test involved. The issue of standardization has to be addressed, before a universal, maximum level of viraemia for EPP performing HCWs can be introduced.

Current treatment and future directions in the management of chronic hepatitis B viral infection

The World Health Organization places hepatitis B virus (HBV) in the top 10 causes of death worldwide. It is estimated that there are over 400 million carriers of HBV as well. At least 20% to 30% of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers will die of complications of chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis and liver cancer. The serious consequences of end-stage liver disease and liver cancer occur in 30% of chronic carriers and confront patients and physicians throughout the world. Vaccination is the major form of treatment (prevention) that may eventually eliminate HBV worldwide. This article discusses the currently available treatments as well as evolving treatments for chronic HBV infection.

Evaluation of the COBAS amplicor HBV monitor assay and comparison with the ultrasensitive HBV hybrid capture 2 assay for quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA

Performance characteristics of the COBAS Amplicor HBV Monitor test (Roche Diagnostics), which measures hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantitatively, were evaluated and compared with the Ultrasensitive HBV Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2; Digene Corporation) assay. Linearity and within-run precision were assessed for both methods by using eight HBV DNA-positive samples serially diluted to obtain a range of <100 to 500,000 HBV DNA copies/ml and run in triplicate. Agreement between the methods was studied with 100 clinical samples. HC2 assay performance near the limit of detection was investigated through repeat testing of 149 samples with HC2 and testing of 37 samples with HC2 results of <4,700 HBV DNA copies/ml by Amplicor assay and a qualitative PCR assay. The linearity experiment for Amplicor had regression of observed values compared to expected values (y = 1.073x - 0.247; R(2) = 0.993, n = 32; for HC2, y = 0.855x + 0.759, R(2) = 0.729, n = 18). Within-run standard deviation of log HBV DNA copies/ml ranged from 0.003 to 0.348 (Amplicor) and 0.027 to 0.253 (HC2). Agreement assessed by Deming regression was poor [Amplicor = 1.197(HC2) - 0.961; R(2) = 0.799, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 0.710, n = 94]. Near the lower limit of detection, 32 of 149 repeat HC2 results were <4,700 HBV DNA copies/ml. Of the 37 samples with HC2 results of <4,700 HBV DNA copies/ml, HBV DNA was not detected in 15 samples, while HBV DNA was detected by at least one PCR method in 12 samples. Amplicor is linear from 200 to 200,000 HBV DNA copies/ml with undiluted samples, and this range can be expanded through dilution. Inconsistent HC2 results near the limit of detection justify use of a grey zone.

HIV-1/hepatitis B coinfection

Reviews the epidemiology, natural history and the current status of treatment of HIV/hepatitis B coinfection.

Treatment of hepatitis B and C after liver transplantation. Part 1, hepatitis B

The outcome of OLT for HBV-related liver disease is dependent on the prevention of allograft re-infection. Over the past decade, major advances have been made in the management of HBV transplant candidates. The advent of long-term hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) administration as a prophylaxis against HBV recurrence, and the introduction of new antiviral agents against HBV infection, such as lamivudine (LAM), were a major breakthrough in the management of these patients. Results of OLT for HBV infection are similar to those achieved with other indications. Pre-OLT antiviral treatment such as LAM can suppress HBV replication before OLT and thus decrease the risk of re-infection of the graft. Combination prophylaxis with LAM and HBIG after transplantation highly effectively reduces the rate of HBV re-infection, even in HBV replicative cirrhotic patients. The optimal HBIG protocol in the LAM era is yet to be defined: dosing of HBIG, routes of administration, and possibility of stopping HBIG. Several antiviral drugs have been developed for the management of HBV infection on the graft, so outcome is currently good.

Review article: Nucleoside analogues for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Current accepted treatment for chronic hepatitis B uses either the immunomodulator interferon alpha or nucleoside analogues lamivudine or adefovir. Interferon has side effects which mean it is often poorly tolerated. Long-term use of lamivudine is associated with increasing viral resistance for each year it is taken and the rebound viraemia that can occur when the drug is stopped is also of concern to many. Adefovir appears to have less of the resistance issues of lamivudine but is still a relatively new drug and at present its use is principally limited to patients with lamivudine-resistant disease. A number of other nucleoside analogues are currently being developed with some now at the stage of early clinical trials. A proportion share the significant resistance problems of lamivudine but many appear to have more potent anti-viral effect than the drugs currently available. If some of these newer anti-viral agents are approved for use in chronic hepatitis B, the potential for prolonged suppression of hepatitis B virus replication with resultant stabilization or improvement in liver disease may be achieved.

Evolving strategies to prevent HBV recurrence

1. Long-term prophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) significantly reduces the risk for hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence and increases survival. Patients with HBV cirrhosis and / or positive HBV DNA at the time of transplantation have a high risk for recurrence despite HBIG prophylaxis. 2. Pre-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) antiviral treatment using lamivudine (LAM) can suppress HBV replication before transplantation and may induce clinical improvement in a subset of patients. Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) may serve as "rescue" therapy for patients with LAM resistance; its place as first-line therapy requires further evaluation. 3. Combination prophylaxis with LAM and HBIG prevents HBV recurrence in 90% to 100% of patients who undergo transplantation for hepatitis B. The optimal HBIG protocol in the "nucleoside-nucleotide analog era" remains to be determined. The place of ADV or LAM as first-line posttransplant antiviral therapy in combination with HBIG requires further studies. 4. Future research should test new protocols using lower HBIG doses given intravenously (IV) or intramuscularly (IM) alone or in combination with antiviral agents and identify patients in whom HBIG prophylaxis can be stopped safely or replaced by antiviral agents or vaccination.

Hepatitis B virus infection: co-infection with hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus, and human immunodeficiency virus

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) shares routes of transmission, namely exchange of infected body fluids, sharing of contaminated needles, and blood transfusion, with other hepatotropic viruses, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis D virus (HDV) and with systemic retroviral infections, such as the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Thus, many HBV infected patients are co-infected with other viral pathogens. Co-infection appears to increase the risk of progression of liver disease and may have important ramifications on choice of antiviral medication and treatment regimen. This article reviews the current knowledge of co-infection of HBV with HCV, HDV, and HIV.

Combination therapy with lamivudine and famciclovir for chronic hepatitis B infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Lamivudine suppresses hepatitis B replication, but drug-resistant mutants emerge with long-term therapy. In vitro data suggest that lamivudine and famciclovir might synergistically inhibit hepadnaviral replication. We reviewed our experience with lamivudine and famciclovir in 24 patients with chronic hepatitis B infection.

METHODS

Patients with chronic hepatitis B infection and detectable HBV DNA received lamivudine and famciclovir combination therapy. The primary end point was HBV DNA suppression at week 48. Follow-up was reviewed for those who remained on combination therapy beyond the first 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirteen treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive subjects received 48 weeks of therapy; all had undetectable HBV DNA levels (less than 2.5 pg/mL) at week 48. Three patients underwent HBeAg seroconversion at week 48 and discontinued therapy. Ten patients remained on combination therapy; 3 developed YMDD (tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate) mutations at year 2, although HBV DNA levels remained below 2.5 pg/mL at a mean of 39 months. A second heterogeneous group of 5 subjects including interferon therapy failures and those with HBeAg-negative infection also received 48 weeks of combination therapy, with 1 subject developing redetection of HBV DNA by week 48. YMDD mutations were noted in the other 4 subjects at year 2, although just 1 subject had HBV DNA greater than 2.5 pg/mL at 39 months of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small pilot study, 48 weeks of therapy with lamivudine and famciclovir was effective in suppressing HBV replication. A randomized controlled trial is required to define the role of combination therapy with lamivudine and famciclovir in delaying the clinical emergence of resistant strains.

Sequential combination therapy of HBe antigen-negative/virus-DNA-positive chronic hepatitis B with famciclovir or lamivudine and interferon-alpha-2a

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatitis B e antigen-negative/hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHBe-) exhibits a high relapse rate on monotherapy with lamivudine or interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha). We investigated, whether sequential therapy with famciclovir or lamivudine followed by combination with IFN-alpha-2a improves durable virologic response in CHBe- characterized by mutation analysis of the HBV precore genome region.

METHODS

Fourteen patients were treated with famciclovir (n=3) or lamivudine for 4 weeks to reduce the viral load, and subsequently with the combination of the nucleoside analogue and IFN-alpha-2a until 16 weeks beyond the loss of serum HBV-DNA.

RESULTS

Median duration of therapy was 29.0 weeks (range 20.6-48.3 weeks). Serum HBV-DNA was undetectable and alanine aminotransferase had normalized in all patients at the end of treatment. Seven (50%) patients maintained a sustained response 12 months after end of treatment. Only two of them had been infected by HBV with the G1896A mutation. Most patients (5/7) with the G1896A mutation relapsed within 4 months after therapy.

CONCLUSION

Sequential combination therapy can induce sustained virologic response in a subgroup of CHBe-, but most with the G1896A precore mutant HBV relapse. Trials of CHBe- should be based on characterization of HBV mutants.

Current pharmacotherapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

The virological profile of infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) is changing in many parts of the world from the classical hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive serological pattern to a HBeAg-negative pattern, linked to the replacement of wild-type HBV by HBV variants with mutations in the core-promoter and in the precore region that prevent the secretion of HBeAg. The wild-type HBV disease is characterised by steady levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and high HBV-DNA levels, responding relatively well to IFN treatment (3 - 5 MU/day or 10 MU every other day for 16 weeks), which induces anti-HBe seroconversion and normalises ALT levels in approximately 30% of the adults, with a minimal risk of relapse. Pegylated-IFN appears to have superior efficacy over conventional IFN-alpha. Mutant-type disease (anti-HBe-positive/HBeAg-negative) is less responsive to IFN given for 6 - 12 months. This has led to the use of novel nucleoside analogues, of which the prototype is lamivudine. The response to lamivudine therapy shares with IFN a rapid decline in ALT accompanied by an improvement in histology; at variance with IFN, in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) there is delayed seroconversion to anti-HBe which accumulates over time, the switch to anti-HBs is more rare and in the long-term, the activity of the drug is abolished by the emergence of viral mutations (YMDD-motif mutants) that may rekindle the disease. The combination of IFN plus lamivudine may be more efficacious than IFN or lamivudine monotherapy. Lamivudine therapy needs to be prolonged in HBeAg-negative CHB. Short-term lamivudine-therapy is highly efficacious in preventing HBV reinfection in liver transplants. Recent data suggest that long-term IFN therapy (24 months) may achieve a response in 30% of HBeAg-negative patients. The advent of adefovir, an analogue of adenosine monophosphate, may provide a safer alternative to lamivudine in the control of HBV disease; the drug is well-tolerated and treatment raises drug-resistant mutants in < 2% of the patients over 2 years of therapy. Adefovir provides rescue therapy against YMDD mutants raised by lamivudine therapy.

The hepatitis B virus polymerase mutation rtV173L is selected during lamivudine therapy and enhances viral replication in vitro

Therapy of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with the polymerase inhibitor lamivudine frequently is associated with the emergence of viral resistance. Genotypic changes in the YMDD motif (reverse transcriptase [rt] mutations rtM204V/I) conferred resistance to lamivudine as well as reducing the in vitro replication efficiency of HBV. A second mutation, rtL180M, was previously reported to partially restore replication fitness as well as to augment drug resistance in vitro. Here we report the functional characterization of a third polymerase mutation (rtV173L) associated with resistance to lamivudine and famciclovir. rtV173L was observed at baseline in 9 to 22% of patients who entered clinical trials of adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of lamivudine-resistant HBV. In these patients, rtV173L was invariably found as a third mutation in conjunction with rtL180M and rtM204V. In vitro analyses indicated that rtV173L did not alter the sensitivity of wild-type or lamivudine-resistant HBV to lamivudine, penciclovir, or adefovir but instead enhanced viral replication efficiency. A molecular model of HBV polymerase indicated that residue rtV173 is located beneath the template strand of HBV nucleic acid near the active site of the reverse transcriptase. Substitution of leucine for valine at this residue may enhance polymerization either by repositioning the template strand of nucleic acid or by affecting other residues involved in the polymerization reaction. Together, these results suggest that rtV173L is a compensatory mutation that is selected in lamivudine-resistant patients due to an enhanced replication phenotype.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B in the human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient: present and future

The management of chronic hepatitis B poses specific problems in the presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection, because therapeutic approaches have to address both hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HIV infections. Response to interferon (IFN-alpha) is lower in HBV-HIV-coinfected than in HIV-negative subjects, especially in patients in advanced stages of immunosuppression. Thus far, there are no data on the performance of the new pegylated forms of IFN-alpha in HBV- and HIV-coinfected persons. After prolonged use of lamivudine, resistance develops in the majority of HBV-HIV-coinfected patients treated with the drug. The more recently approved tenofovir has shown excellent short-term results, and data from longer follow-up studies are eagerly awaited. Several drugs with combined anti-HIV and anti-HBV activity have recently been approved (emtricitabine) or are currently under development. Preliminary results with some of them are quite promising and probably will widen the therapeutic armamentarium against hepatitis B in patients with HIV infection.

Use of prophylactic lamivudine and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B infection

Chronic HBsAg carriers are known to have a higher risk of hepatitis-related mortality and morbidity when undergoing kidney transplantation. Immunosuppressants might flare up the infection that could be fulminating. Lamivudine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been shown to be effective in inhibiting replication of hepatitis B virus (HBV). With these two drugs, hepatitis related adverse outcome might be preventable when these patients are being transplanted. Four Chinese adolescents with chronic HBV infection were transplanted in our Department from 1999 to 2001. Immunosuppresants included prednisolone, cyclosporin A and MMF; azathioprine was not used for its potentially liver toxic effect. Prophylactic lamivudine 3 mg/kg and maximum 100 mg daily was given just before transplantation and was continued afterwards. HBV status and liver enzymes were monitored serially. Patients were followed up for 26.0 +/- 10.3 (11-34) months post-transplant and no mortality was reported. All grafts were functioning and no rejection was noted. MMF and lamivudine were well tolerated. Alanine transaminase was only transiently elevated in the first 2 months post-transplant in all patients and became normal afterwards. The patients were clinically well and liver function was normal at the last follow-up. However, HBV DNA became positive in three patients after the transplantation. YMDD mutant HBV was negative in one patient and undeterminable in the other three due to low virus load. In summary, with prophylactic lamivudine and MMF, short-term follow-up showed that renal transplant might be feasible and safe in chronic HBV carriers.

Hepatitis B reactivation in patients positive for hepatitis B surface antigen undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

Hepatitis due to reactivation of hepatitis B virus is an important cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients undergoing autologous hematopoeitic cell transplantation. With the recent introduction of sensitive serum HBV DNA quantitation assay, the diagnosis of hepatitis B reactivation can now be made more reliably. As these hepatitis are driven by the host immune response to a surge of hepatitis B viral load, the availability of effective nucleoside analogues which can inhibit hepatitis B viral replication has opened up new approaches to this previously untreatable condition. Up till now, two such nucleoside analogues, lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection. However, further studies are needed to determine which nucleoside analogues should be chosen in this transplant setting. Due to the high dose chemotherapy generally needed in autologous hematopoeitic cell transplantation, there is a high risk of post-transplant hepatitis B reactivation. Hence, all HBsAg positive patients undergoing autologous hematopoeitic cell transplantation should preferably be treated pre-emptively with nucleoside analogous. An alternative approach is to defer treatment with nucleoside analogous until there is evidence of hepatitis B virological reactivation. However, the latter approach would need the patient's hepatitis B viral load be monitored at a very close interval and might not be cost-effective.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: current challenges and future directions

The clinical management of chronic hepatitis B infection has entered a new era with the introduction and widespread use of oral nucleoside analogues such as lamivudine and nucleotides such as adefovir dipivoxil. From this, new challenges have now emerged in terms of preventing antiviral drug resistance, promoting viral clearance and improving long-term survival. For example, the natural history of nucleoside or nucleotide analogue-associated hepatitis B virus resistant mutants has yet to be determined. Furthermore, the increasing prevalence of HBeAg negative disease with its reduced response to current therapies represents an ongoing challenge to attempts to improve standard of care. There is increasing recognition of the pivotal role that viral load and genotype, and their complex interactions with the host immune response, play in determining the outcome of these treatment interventions. The purpose of this paper is to highlight several key factors that should be considered in the context of future clinical research and management of chronic hepatitis B.

Serum HBV DNA as a marker of efficacy during therapy for chronic HBV infection: analysis and review of the literature

Currently, compounds under evaluation for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are evaluated with liver histology as the primary end point for efficacy. However, because of practical limitations in serial liver biopsies, there is a need for alternate markers to assess efficacy over shorter periods of time. Considering the direct correlation between viral replication and disease progression during human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infection, we explored whether such a correlation exists for HBV infection. We reviewed the literature and conducted an analysis to investigate the relationship between absolute or treatment-induced changes in HBV DNA levels and other accepted markers of disease activity. A total of 26 prospective studies met our selection criteria, including 33 evaluable treatment arms. The study treatments consisted of nucleosides and/or interferon regimens and control arms. We found statistically significant and consistent correlations between viral load level or change and histologic grading and biochemical and serologic response. Our analysis suggests that a treatment-induced reduction in HBV DNA level can be used for assessing efficacy of treatment regimens. Further, we observed that quantitative HBV DNA has a broader dynamic range than histology, allowing demonstration of differences between 2 active treatments of unequal potency. The analysis showed stronger results in studies using nucleoside regimens and in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients. In conclusion, the goal of anti-HBV therapy should be profound and durable viral suppression, as defined by very sensitive assays. Additional prospective studies are needed to precisely determine the desirable level of viremia to attain.

Kawasaki-like syndromes and other vasculitic syndromes in HIV-infected patients

Excluding drug-related hypersensitivity reactions, vasculitic syndromes are not common in HIV-positive patients. Review of the existing literature suggests that HIV positive patients may be predisposed to polyarteritis nodosa, microscopic polyarteritis, Kawasaki-like syndromes, acute occlusion syndromes, primary angiitis of the central nervous system and erythema elevatum diutinum. With the exception of erythema elevatum diutinum, these vasculitic syndromes have significant morbidities and mortality if they are not treated. It is therefore important to make these diagnoses and to initiate appropriate therapy in a timely fashion. Because fevers, malaise, weakness, rashes, headaches and neurologic symptoms are common in HIV-positive patients, it is probable that some cases of vasculitis go undiagnosed. In this report, we review vasculitic syndromes seen in HIV-positive patients. We also re-examine a previously published case of a young HIV-positive male who died of an acute myocardial infarction without atherosclerotic disease. Immunohistopathology of the affected arteries suggests that he died of a Kawasaki-like syndrome.

Lamivudine and famciclovir combination therapy with or without addition of interferon-alpha-2b for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a pilot study

Lamivudine and famciclovir combination therapy has been used in patients with chronic HBeAg-positive hepatitis B to enhance the antiviral effect and reduce the risk of development of resistance. Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) can theoretically be added to the regimen to further improve the antiviral effect. Twenty patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B were given lamivudine and famciclovir combination therapy for 24 weeks. After 12 weeks of treatment, patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to either the addition of IFN-alpha 2b or no addition for the last 3 months of therapy. The decline in HBV DNA levels, the loss of HBeAg and the HBeAg seroconversion rate were assessed. Patients with loss of HBeAg and/or development of anti-HBe were followed up for at least 1 y after stopping treatment. Four of 19 patients (21%) had lost HBeAg and/or developed anti-HBe 24 weeks after stopping treatment, 1 of whom had received additional IFN-alpha. During long-term follow-up post-treatment, 2/19 patients (10.5%) had a durable HBeAg seroconversion. The mean HBV DNA level declined by 5 logs during the first 12 weeks of treatment. Addition of IFN-alpha during the last 3 months of treatment did not result in any further decline in HBV DNA levels compared with the non-IFN-alpha-treated group, nor in any increase in the HBeAg seroconversion rate. In conclusion, lamivudine and famciclovir combination treatment induced seroconversion from HBeAg to anti-HBe in 4/19 patients, 2 of whom became long-term responders. Addition of IFN-alpha did not improve the seroconversion rate.

Antiviral therapy for hepatitis B virus infections: new targets and technical challenges

There are presently only two licensed therapies for treating liver disease caused by infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV). These are interferon-alpha and lamivudine. Neither agent was specifically developed as an antiviral compound for treating patients infected with HBV. Both therapies are limited in the clinic by a low response rate and in the case of lamivudine, selection of drug-resistant mutants, whilst troublesome side effects limit the use of interferon-alpha. Several promising nucleoside/nucleotide analogues are undergoing clinical trials, including adefovir dipivoxil and entecavir, both of which appear to be active against lamivudine- resistant HBV. In addition to these nucleoside/nucleotide analogues, it will be important to develop new agents with different modes of action, which can be added to the antiviral cocktails that will be required to adequately suppress and hopefully eliminate HBV replication.

Phenylpropenamide derivatives AT-61 and AT-130 inhibit replication of wild-type and lamivudine-resistant strains of hepatitis B virus in vitro

The phenylpropenamide derivatives AT-61 and AT-130 are nonnucleoside analogue inhibitors of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. They inhibited the replication of wild-type HBV with 50% inhibitory concentrations of 21.2 +/- 9.5 and 2.40 +/- 0.92 micro M, respectively, compared to 0.064 +/- 0.020 micro M lamivudine. There were no significant differences in sensitivity between wild-type and nucleoside analogue-resistant (rtL180M, rtM204I, and rtL180M + rtM204V) HBV.

Preemptive use of lamivudine reduces hepatitis B exacerbation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Exacerbation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients undergoing transplantation. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of lamivudine to prevent hepatitis due to exacerbation of HBV in HBsAg-positive patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. We studied 20 consecutive HBsAg-positive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation who received lamivudine 100 mg daily starting one week before transplantation until week 52 after transplantation (group 1). Serial serum alanine aminotransferase and HBV DNA levels were measured before and after transplantation at 4- to 8-week intervals for the first year and then 4- to 12-week intervals. Their virologic and clinical outcomes were compared with 20 case-matched recipients who did not receive any antiviral therapy to HBV (anti-HBV) before and after hematopoietic cell transplantation (group 2). After transplantation, 9 patients (45%) in group 2 and one patient (5%) in group 1 had hepatitis due to exacerbation of HBV (P <.008), with 3 hepatic failures in group 2 and none in group 1. The one-year actuarial probability of survival without hepatitis due to exacerbation of HBV was higher in group 1 than group 2 (94.1% vs. 54.3%, P =.002). By multivariate Cox analysis, preemptive use of lamivudine effectively reduced hepatitis due to exacerbation of HBV (adjusted hazards ratio, 0.09; P =.021). In conclusion, preemptive lamivudine reduced HBV exacerbation. The use of lamivudine with other immunosuppressive regimens to prevent exacerbation of HBV should be further explored.

Famciclovir treatment of chronic delta hepatitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Interferon is the only established therapy for chronic delta hepatitis and alternative treatment options are an urgent need. Since successful treatment of a case of post-transplant delta hepatitis with the nucleoside analogue famciclovir had been reported, a pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the use of famciclovir in the treatment of chronic delta hepatitis.

METHODS

A total of 15 adult patients, 13 men, two women, ages 20-52 years, with chronic delta hepatitis were treated with famciclovir, 500 mg, three times a day for 6 months and were then followed-up for 6 months posttreatment. All patients had compensated chronic liver disease, elevated liver enzymes and were hepatitis delta virus (HDV) RNA positive by polymerase chain reaction at baseline. Patients were monitored and tested for HBsAg, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and HDV RNA levels. Liver biopsies were obtained before starting famciclovir and within 1 month of completion of treatment.

RESULTS

HBV DNA levels decreased in nine of the 15 patients and levels rose again after treatment (P<0.05). Famciclovir had no effect on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBsAg levels or on serum HDV RNA and overall, there was no improvement in liver histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of chronic delta hepatitis with famciclovir has no effect on disease activity and HDV RNA levels.

Comparison of the efficacy of lamivudine and famciclovir in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B: results of 24 weeks of therapy

Lamivudine therapy improves hepatic necro-inflammatory activity, decreases progression of fibrosis, and suppresses hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. Famciclovir has also been shown to have some effect in the suppression of HBV replication. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of treatment with lamivudine and famciclovir on serum HBV DNA levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B and to assess safety. A prospective randomised clinical study was carried out on 100 patients with chronic hepatitis B infection (50 patients received lamivudine 100 mg daily and 50 patients received famciclovir 500 mg three times a day for 12 weeks. From the twelfth week onwards, patients were offered lamivudine 100 mg daily up to 48 weeks). Significantly more patients treated by lamivudine than by famciclovir had undetectable HBV DNA levels after 12 weeks of therapy (P < 0.001). The median HBV DNA levels were significantly lower in the lamivudine-treated patients from the second week of treatment onwards (P < 0.001 for all time points up to 12 weeks). At week 16, 4 weeks after the famciclovir treated patients were put on lamivudine, there was no longer any difference in HBV DNA levels between the two groups of patients. Both treatments were well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported. It was concluded that in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B infection, lamivudine achieved effective suppression of HBV DNA levels within 4 weeks of therapy whereas famciclovir had a significantly weaker action.

Nucleoside analogues for chronic hepatitis B: antiviral efficacy and viral resistance

Nucleoside analogues have been recently introduced in the management of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. They mainly act by inhibition of HBV polymerase activity resulting in decrease of viral replication. They are administered orally, and most of them have an excellent tolerance and safety profile. Lamivudine is the only nucleoside analogue licensed for chronic hepatitis B. It has potent activity against HBV, and a 12-month course achieves clearance of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) in 20-30% of HBeAg-positive patients and both biochemical and virological remission in more than 65-70% of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients. Famciclovir and ganciclovir are less effective, whereas other nucleoside or nucleotide analogues, such as adefovir, entecavir, and emtricitabine, are currently under evaluation. Prolonged effective antiviral therapy is required for eradication of chronic HBV infection, but long-term treatment with nucleoside analogues has been found to be associated with progressively increasing rates of viral resistance because of emergence of resistant HBV mutant strains. Virological breakthroughs usually develop after the first 6 months of lamivudine monotherapy, and their rate ranges between 15% and 30% at 12 months and exceeds 50% after 3 yr of therapy. Resistant HBV mutant strains harbor point mutations in the HBV polymerase gene and predominantly in the well-conserved YMDD motif. Although resistant HBV strains may have impaired replication capacity compared with the wild HBV, their clinical significance has not been completely clarified yet. No significant biochemical or clinical event may develop in some cases, whereas severe biochemical breakthroughs with or without deterioration of liver function may develop in others. To date, there is no proven effective therapy for the resistant HBV mutant strains, although adefovir and entecavir seem to be interesting candidates.

Thymosin-alpha1 and famciclovir combination therapy activates T-cell response in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection in immune-tolerant phase

We examined whether combination therapy with thymosin-alpha1 and famciclovir would induce hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection in the immune-tolerant phase without inducing significant hepatic necro-inflammation. We studied 32 hepatitis B e antigen positive patients in the immune-tolerant phase of infection, treated with 26-weeks combination therapy of famciclovir and thymosin-alpha1 (group 1). Thirty-two patients who received 26-weeks famciclovir monotherapy (group 2) and another 32 patients who received no treatment (group 3), served as controls. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferation and cytokine secretion in response to recombinant HBV core and surface antigen and serial serum HBV-DNA, were assayed. No significant difference in adverse events were observed among the three groups. By week 26, the median reduction in group 1 (0.94 log10 copies/mL) was greater than group 2 (0.70 log10 copies/mL, P < 0.001). Five (15.6%) patients in group 1 at 52 weeks (median range 13-78 weeks) and none in group 2 or 3 experienced hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion (P = 0.053). Sustained serological clearance of hepatitis B e antigen was associated with activation of CD4 positive HBV-specific T-cell reactivity and were of T-helper 1. Hence combination therapy with immunomodulatory agents and nucleoside analogues should be explored.

Comparison of different treatment combinations for chronic hepatitis B infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a leading cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. Its prevalence approaches 10% in hyper endemic areas. The aim of treating chronic HBV infection is to halt progression of liver injury by suppressing viral replication or eliminating infection. This study was planned to evaluate the advantages of combination therapy with interferon-alpha plus second-generation nucleoside analogues (lamivudine or famciclovir), or vaccination with a pre-S2 and S proteins containing vaccine in chronic HBV infection. 29 patients were divided into three groups and were treated with the following combinations: (1) IFN-alpha2a 9 million units 3x week for 6 months with HBV vaccine 20 microg given on 0, 1 and 2 months; (2) IFN-alpha2a 6 million units 3x week plus famciclovir 250 mg 3x day for 6 months; (3) IFN-alpha2a 6 million units 3x week plus lamivudine 100 mg/day for 6 months. Complete response was suspected in 3 patients in group 1, in 4 patients in group 2, and in 7 patients in group 3. Partial response was suspected in 4, 1 and 2 patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The results of the present study suggest that the combination of IFN-alpha with lamivudine is more effective than the combination of IFN-alpha with HBV vaccination or famciclovir.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: case selection and duration of therapy

Hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection is a major health burden in the Asia-Pacific region. The seriousness of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is often realized at a late stage. The resultant morbidity and mortality from cirrhosis complications is considerable, with a high human cost. The most affected patients are men aged 40 years or older. Two decades ago, the prognosis for the 300 million "Australia antigen"-positive people (people with chronic HBV infection) was gloomy, with no effective intervention. Twenty years on, research and development have changed their outlook. Chronic hepatitis should now be diagnosed early, at the asymptomatic stage. Proper assessment and judicial introduction of therapy can suppress replication of HBV and resolve liver inflammation, thereby preventing the silent progression of chronic liver disease to end-stage cirrhosis. Interferon (IFN) monotherapy has been available for nearly 20 years, but various limitations restrict its general application. Injection-based therapies are inconvenient, the response rate is low (33% hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion rate among optimal cases), side-effects are many, and some serious, and the cost is unaffordable for most people. However, in non-cirrhotic patients with mild to moderate disease activity, IFN is still a worthwhile option because the treatment course is shorter, mutation seems less of a problem and most responses are permanent and reduce or abolish late complications. Lamivudine, an oral nucleoside analog with potent antiviral effects, has been approved in many countries. Daily dosing of 100 mg reduces serum HBV-DNA to below detectable levels within 6 weeks. In HBeAg-positive patients, approximately 16% of treated patients seroconverted with the first year. This was associated with significant improvement in liver histology. Long-term treatment induces further HBeAg seroconversion, but overall clinical benefit is undermined by continuous emergence of drug-resistant YMDD mutants. In an Asian multicentre study, 58 patients on 5 years lamivudine therapy showed annual cumulative HBeAg seroconversion rates at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years of 22, 29, 40, 47 and 50%, respectively. The best predictor of response is pretreatment alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Among patients with ALT > 2x the upper limit of normal (ULN), annual HBeAg seroconversion is increased to 38, 42, 65, 73 and 77%, respectively. However, emergence of YMDD mutants occurred at a cumulative rate of 15, 38, 55, 67 and 69%, respectively. The impact of this emergence on disease activity is unpredictable. Thus, while continued disease suppression, or even HBeAg seroconversion, still occurred in some patients, in others hepatitis may relapse and liver failure has been reported despite continuation of lamivudine. While the duration of lamivudine therapy is difficult to define, the best strategy may be to define only active CHB with major ALT elevation (par-ticularly ALT > 5x ULN) for a duration of 1 year or less. Lamivudine can be stopped in responders. The response is durable in approximately 80% of responders. Non-responders should be monitored closely for rebound off treatment. Therapy can be re-instituted if ALT is over 5x ULN. Management of patients with YMDD mutants can be challenging, but there is no clear evidence to recommend stopping or continuing lamivudine, or to add other possible effective agents, such as adefovir dipivoxil. More data are required to help draw up guidelines. Hepatitis B e antigen-negative CHB has been less well studied. Both IFN and lamivudine can suppress disease activity, but permanent responses are few. Without a distinct marker as an end-point for response, the duration of treatment is even more difficult to define. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction for low viral levels may give a clue, but definitive studies are required. Monotherapy is clearly not the answer for the majority of CHB patients with active disease. Combination therapy has the theoretical advantage of additional or synergistic efficacy. Preliminary results on IFN and lamivudine are promising and further clinical trials are ongoing. Emtricitabine (FTC), adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, BL-thymidine (L-dT), DAPD, clevudine (l-FMAU), thymosin, therapeutic vaccines and various herbal medicines are potential candidates. Antiviral action in conjunction with immune modulation may have a better chance of eradicating HBV and its cccDNA in the hepatocytes as the basis for an eventual successful outcome. The key points are: (i) approved therapeutic agents for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are IFN, lamivudine and thymosin (in a few countries only); (ii) indications for IFN therapy are viremia in compensated CHB patients with moderately raised ALT; (iii) lamivudine has broader therapeutic indications: it is effective in subgroups of CHB patients with compensated or decompensated liver diseases, but generally works better if patients have raised ALT; (iv) lamivudine has a potent suppressive action on HBV replication, including HBeAg-negative variants, but cannot eliminate cccDNA; this is the reason for the relapse of disease after discontinuing treatment, unless HBeAg seroconversion is obtained; (v) successful use of lamivudine aims at HBeAg seroconversion or profound suppression of HBV-DNA to serum levels of less than 100 000 viral copies/mL, in order to prevent emergence of drug-resistant YMDD mutants (which commences from 6 months onward); (vi) YMDD mutants may cause a flare of hepatitis, resulting in deterioration of liver histology and, occasionally, liver failure; (vii) combination therapy of lamivudine with IFN (standard or pegylated) or other nucleoside analogs should be the next advance. Preliminary data from IFN and lamivudine combination therapy show some promise, but there are conflicting results.

Psychosocial impact of C282Y mutation testing for hemochromatosis

The aim of this study was to investigate the psychological effects of genetic testing for hemochromatosis. Study participants included cases discovered through a population screening study in 5211 voluntary blood donors (n = 25) and patients referred for diagnostic evaluation for hemochromatosis (n = 117). Participants completed questionnaires (Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Index, Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 36) before and after genetic testing. A subset of participants from the screening study was also interviewed 1 year after testing (Feelings About Test Results Measure). Additional questions included data on insurance applications, time off from work, and family issues. Anxiety significantly decreased in homozygotes and heterozygotes after genetic testing and remained constant in C282Y mutation-negative cases. Vitality and physical composite scores improved after genetic testing. There were no significant deleterious psychological effects of genetic testing on anxiety and on mental and physical health status. There were no negative effects discovered on insurance or time off work. This study has not demonstrated deleterious effects of genetic testing for hemochromatosis on anxiety, mental health and physical health status, insurance, or time off from work. Genetic testing for hemochromatosis is well accepted and should not be discouraged on the basis of potential adverse psychosocial effects.

Management of viral hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major global health concern and is the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. The natural history and clinical outcomes of chronic HBV infection are determined by the viral replication cycle and the host immune responses. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B is directed at interrupting the natural history by suppressing HBV replication before development of any significant irreversible liver cell damage. Effective antiviral therapies should be followed by sustained suppression of HBV-DNA, normalization of transaminases levels and a stable stage of HBeAg seroconversion with persistence of circulating anti-HBeAg antibodies. Two major classes of antiviral therapeutic agents that have been approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis B are immunomodulating agents (i.e. interferon) and the nucleoside analogs (i.e. lamivudine). A 4-6 month course of interferon-alpha has resulted in improvement of survival in 20%-30% of patients with chronic hepatitis B who had elevated serum ALT levels without hepatic decompensation. Interferon-alpha therapy is associated with HBeAg seroconversion; normalization of ALT levels, reduced hepatic inflammation, and possibly reduced disease progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon can also be used with caution in patients with early compensated cirrhosis. A 12-month course of lamivudine has been shown to be well tolerated and effective. Lamivudine can be used in decompensated cirrhosis and immunosuppressed patients and for prevention of recurrent HBV infection after liver transplantation. The response rates after 3 years of lamivudine therapy account for 40-65%. A major problem of antiviral treatment is the emergence of drug resistance conferred by mutations in the YMDD motif of HBV reverse transcriptase. The prevalence of YMDD mutations increases with longer durations of antiviral therapies and this has been detected in 20% of immunocompetent patients receiving lamivudine per year. Contentious issues remain when to stop the treatment if HBeAg seroconversion does not occur. Many new immunomodulatory therapies and antiviral agents are in various stages of clinical development and have shown some promise. Among newer HBV antivirals, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, emtricitabine, DAPD and clevudine appear to be at least as potent as lamivudine in suppressing HBV replication. In vitro studies have shown that YMDD mutations confer cross-resistance between lamivudine and emtricitabine. However, adefovir, dipivoxil, lobucavir, DAPD and possibly clevudine suppress replications of both YMDD mutants and wild types of HBV. Immunomodulatory approaches for treatment of chronic hepatitis B are conceptually attractive, but newer agents used to date (thymosin-alpha, interleukin-12, therapeutic vaccines) have not demonstrated sufficient efficacy for widespread use. Combinations of an immunomodulatory agent and nucleoside analog may improve the therapeutic efficacy and reduce the emergence of drug resistance. Nevertheless, combinations of interferon and lamivudine therapies do not confer such additional benefits. The next challenge for HBV treatment is to use antivirals in combination and/or in cyclical therapy to minimize the emergence of drug resistance and increase efficacy, particularly to achieve sustainable post-treatment suppression of HBV. Randomized prospective control trials of combined antiviral therapies given simultaneously or sequentially are needed to establish safe and effective combined regimens that can be recommended for future treatment strategies.

How will we use the new antiviral agents for hepatitis B?

There are two licensed drugs for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), interferon alfa and lamivudine, with similar efficacy rates. Lamivudine is less expensive and better tolerated than interferon alfa and is the drug of choice for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and recurrent HBV infection after liver transplantation. The major problem with lamivudine monotherapy has been the emergence of drug-resistant HBV polymerase (YMDD) mutants. Thus, long-term use of lamivudine in other settings remains somewhat controversial. Alternative nucleoside analogues that are active against both wild-type and YMDD-mutant HBV are currently being tested. It is hoped that a combination of one or more of these agents with lamivudine will not only prove more effective than lamivudine alone but also decrease the rate of lamivudine resistance. Preliminary studies suggest that the combination of interferon and lamivudine is associated with an enhanced rate of virologic response when compared with either agent alone. From a theoretical perspective, the combination of interferon with one or more nucleoside analogues may be the most effective way to treat HBV infection in many clinical situations.

Evolving therapies for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Despite the availability of prophylactic vaccines lamivudine and IFN-alpha, chronic hepatitis B remains an enormous global health problem. Several promising nucleosides/nucleotides are undergoing clinical trials, including adefovir dipivoxil, the latter of which is active against lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV). In addition to nucleosides/nucleotides, it will be important to develop new agents with different modes of action. Novel small molecule inhibitors, as well as gene therapy approaches, have produced encouraging results in vitro and in animal models. Additional immunomodulatory therapies, including thymosin-alpha 1, IL-12 and several therapeutic vaccines, are also being explored. Combination therapy with multiple nucleosides/nucleotides and other agents will play an important role in the treatment of hepatitis and may help achieve complete viral suppression, host-mediated elimination of infected cells and lasting immunity.

Nucleoside analogues for chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus replicates inside the hepatocyte through an intermediate step of reverse transcription mediated by the viral polymerase. We describe five nucleoside/nucleotide analogues that interfere with the replication mechanisms of the hepatitis B virus. The resemblance of nucleoside analogues to natural nucleosides may lead to direct cytotoxicity. Therefore, antiviral activity should always be interpreted in the light of cellular toxicity. In addition, prolonged therapy with a nucleoside analogue may induce mutations in the viral polymerase, causing structural and configurational changes of the polymerase resulting in a decreased affinity for the nucleoside analogue. Subsequently, the mutated virus is capable of renewed replication during continued antiviral pressure of the nucleoside analogue. The best antiviral strategy in the future is probably combination therapy, either with several nucleoside analogues or with a nucleoside analogue and interferon.

Tolerability of treatments for viral hepatitis

Interferon-alpha is the most widely used antiviral drug in chronic hepatitis B and C. Tolerability is usually good and serious adverse effects are rare. Most of the adverse effects are mild or transient and do not necessitate drug withdrawal. More than 90% of patients who are given interferon-alpha achieve 6 months to 1 year of treatment without serious adverse effects. The serious adverse effects usually occur in predisposed patients with pre-existing organ dysfunction. Nevertheless, careful selection of patients for therapy and observation during therapy are recommended. Nucleoside analogues are promising drugs in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B through inhibition of viral DNA polymerase. Lamivudine has been licensed for use in this indication. Its tolerability is excellent even when used for periods of 1 year or more. The main concern is the relatively high incidence of viral resistance resulting in breakthrough during or relapse after therapy. In the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, ribavirin, in combination with interferon-alpha is currently the reference therapy. The main adverse effect is haemolytic anaemia, which necessitates careful monitoring and adjustment of dosage in many cases. Recently, large trials showed the better efficacy of pegylated interferons as compared with standard interferon. The combination of pegylated interferon with ribavirin is under evaluation.

Extended follow-up of anti-HBe-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B retreated with ribavirin and interferon-alpha

In a pilot study of combination therapy with ribavirin and IFN alpha conducted in anti-HBe-positive individuals with chronic hepatitis B, 21% of patients achieved a sustained ALT normalization and clearance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA as measured by PCR. The present work has assessed whether these sustained responses are lasting long-term. In addition, IFN gamma levels were tested serially in serum as a measure of the immune system activation during treatment. By extending the post-treatment follow-up period 2 years the occurrence of delayed HBV DNA relapses was observed. A low serum level of IFN gamma was detected during and after treatment. IFN gamma demonstrated a multiphasic time-course: the amount of IFN gamma increased in parallel with reductions in HBV DNA but also with ALT flare-ups. In conclusion, the extended follow-up study of anti-HBe-positive patients after combined treatment with ribavirin and IFN alpha has shown that sustained responses are lasting in 17% patients but also that a late onset HBV DNA relapse may occur.

Therapeutic advances in the management of hepatitis B and hepatitis C

Until recently, interferon monotherapy has been the only available therapeutic option for patients with chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C. Lamivudine has emerged as another effective first-line therapy for chronic hepatitis B as well as a beneficial treatment option for patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis. Viral resistance with long-term lamivudine therapy remains a major concern but new data continue to show benefits despite the development of YMDD mutations. Combination therapy with ribavirin and pegylated interferon-alpha has revolutionized the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. The rate of sustained virological response can now be expected to be as high as nearly 50% for genotype 1 and 80% for non-1 genotypes of hepatitis C.

Drug discovery and development of antiviral agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

A safe and effective vaccine for hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been available for nearly twenty years and currently campaigns to provide universal vaccination in developing countries are underway. Nevertheless, chronic HBV infection remains a leading cause of chronic hepatitis worldwide and there is a strong need for safe and effective antiviral therapies. Attempts to identify and develop antiviral agents to treat chronic HBV infection remains focused on nucleoside analogs such as 3TC (lamivudine), adefovir dipivoxil, (bis-POMPMEA), and others. However, advances in our understanding of the molecular biology of HBV and the development of new assays for HBV polymerase activity, such as the reconstitution of active HBV polymerase in vitro, should facilitate large screening efforts for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Recent advances have furthered our understanding of clinical resistance to lamivudine, have provided new approaches to treatment, and have offered new perspectives on the major challenges to the identification and development of antiviral agents for chronic HBV infection. Here, in an update to our previous review article that appeared in this series [59a], we focus on recent advances that have occurred in the areas of virus structure and replication, in vitro viral polymerase assays, cell culture systems, and animal models.

Cross-resistance testing of antihepadnaviral compounds using novel recombinant baculoviruses which encode drug-resistant strains of hepatitis B virus

Long-term nucleoside analog therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related disease frequently results in the selection of mutant HBV strains that are resistant to therapy. Molecular studies of such drug-resistant variants are clearly warranted but have been difficult to do because of the lack of convenient and reliable in vitro culture systems for HBV. We previously developed a novel in vitro system for studying HBV replication that relies on the use of recombinant baculoviruses to deliver greater than unit length copies of the HBV genome to HepG2 cells. High levels of HBV replication can be achieved in this system, which has recently been used to assess the effects of lamivudine on HBV replication and covalently closed circular DNA accumulation. The further development of this novel system and its application to determine the cross-resistance profiles of drug-resistant HBV strains are described here. For these studies, novel recombinant HBV baculoviruses which encoded the L526M, M550I, and L526M M550V drug resistance mutations were generated and used to examine the effects of these substitutions on viral sensitivity to lamivudine, penciclovir (the active form of famciclovir), and adefovir, three compounds of clinical importance. The following observations were made: (i) the L526M mutation confers resistance to penciclovir and partial resistance to lamivudine, (ii) the YMDD mutations M550I and L526M M550V confer high levels of resistance to lamivudine and penciclovir, and (iii) adefovir is active against each of these mutants. These findings are supported by the limited amount of clinical data currently available and confirm the utility of the HBV-baculovirus system as an in vitro tool for the molecular characterization of clinically significant HBV strains.

Diagnosis and management of pre-core mutant chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis due to pre-core hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutants presents as hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB). HBeAg-negative CHB represents a late phase in the natural course of chronic HBV infection that develops after HBeAg loss and seroconversion to anti-HBe. It is usually associated with pre-core stop codon mutation at nucleotide 1896 (mainly selected in non-A HBV genotypes), but also with other pre-core changes or with mutations in the basic core promoter region (mainly in HBV genotype A). In chronic HBV infections, pre-core mutants can be detected both in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB and in inactive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers. The diagnosis of HBeAg-negative CHB is based on HBsAg positivity, HBeAg negativity, and mainly on increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and serum HBV-DNA levels and exclusion of other causes of liver disease. The differential diagnosis between patients with CHB and inactive HBsAg carriers can be made only by close follow-up of aminotransferase activity and viraemia levels, although the cut-off level of serum HBV DNA has not been definitely determined. IgM anti-HBc levels have also been suggested as an index that increases the diagnostic accuracy for transient hepatitis flares, while liver biopsy confirms the diagnosis and evaluates the severity of the liver disease. Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and lamivudine are the two drugs that have been tried, mainly in the management of HBeAg-negative CHB. A 12-month course of IFN-alpha achieves sustained biochemical remission in about 20% of patients, which has been associated with improvement in the long-term outcome of this subset. A 12-month course of lamivudine is rather ineffective, maintaining remission in less than 15% of patients after cessation of therapy. Long-term lamivudine is associated with progressively increasing rate of virological and subsequent biochemical breakthroughs due to YMDD mutants, with approximately 30% of patients remaining in remission in the third year of therapy. Several other antiviral agents are currently being evaluated in this setting with combined regimens being the most reasonable step for the near future.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy--pathogenesis and management

In an endemic area for chronic hepatitis B infection, reactivation of this virus is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy. Careful prospective serological testing has shown that hepatitis B virus reactivation is a two-staged process. The initial stage occurs during intense cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy and is characterised by enhanced viral replication, as reflected by increases in the serum levels of hepatitis B virus DNA, hepatitis B e antigen, hepatitis B virus DNA polymerase and infection of naïve hepatocytes with hepatitis B virus. The second stage is related to restoration of immune function following withdrawal of cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy, which causes rapid immune-mediated destruction of infected hepatocytes. Clinically, this can lead to hepatitis, hepatic failure and even death. The occurrence and severity of hepatitis B virus reactivation after various cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy is unpredictable and treatment has been disappointing, largely due to the late administration of therapy. Recently, pre-emptive treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients undergoing cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy, with potent nucleoside analogues has shown some promising results. Further controlled studies are needed to define the incidence and risk factors of hepatitis B reactivation so that pre-emptive treatment with nucleoside analogues could be administered to those patients at high risk of disease.

In vitro susceptibilities of wild-type or drug-resistant hepatitis B virus to (-)-beta-D-2,6-diaminopurine dioxolane and 2'-fluoro-5-methyl-beta-L-arabinofuranosyluracil

Prolonged treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with lamivudine ([-]-beta-L-2',3'-dideoxy-3' thiacytidine) or famciclovir may select for viral mutants that are drug resistant due to point mutations in the polymerase gene. Determining whether such HBV mutants are sensitive to new antiviral agents is therefore important. We used a transient transfection system to compare the sensitivities of wild-type HBV and four lamivudine- and/or famciclovir-resistant HBV mutants to adefovir [9-(2-phosphonyl-methoxyethyl)-adenine; PMEA] and the nucleoside analogues (-)-beta-D-2, 6-diaminopurine dioxolane (DAPD) and 2'-fluoro-5-methyl-beta-L-arabinofuranosyluracil (L-FMAU). The drug-resistant mutants contained amino acid substitutions in the polymerase protein. We found that the M550I and M550V plus L526M substitutions, which confer lamivudine resistance, did not confer cross-resistance to adefovir or DAPD, but conferred cross-resistance to L-FMAU. The M550V substitution in isolation conferred a similar phenotype to M550I, except that it did not confer significant resistance to L-FMAU. The L526M substitution, which is associated with famciclovir resistance, conferred cross-resistance to L-FMAU but not to adefovir or DAPD. Inhibition of HBV secretion by DAPD, L-FMAU, and adefovir did not always correlate with inhibition of the generation of intracellular HBV replicative intermediates, suggesting that these analogs may preferentially inhibit specific stages of the viral replication cycle.

Viral hepatitis

Viral hepatitis constitutes the most common entity seen in hepatology practice. Hepatitis A vaccination is recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis. Both lamivudine and interferon are established therapies against chronic hepatitis B, with other treatments not equally effective. Adefovir dipivoxil is a promising new treatment for lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B mutants. Lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin are effective in preventing recurrence of hepatitis B after transplantation. The combination of interferon and ribavirin has been shown to be effective for treatment of hepatitis C. Studies support the antiviral, antifibrotic, and antineoplastic effect of interferon therapy. Recurrence of hepatitis C after transplantation has been associated with more rapid progression to cirrhosis. Other major advances in the field of viral hepatitis during the past year are highlighted.

Current Options for the Therapy of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

Until recently the only available treatment for chronic hepatitis B was interferon-alpha. Over the past few years a new class of antiviral has become available, the reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Lamivudine is a nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor that was recently approved in many countries for the treatment of hepatitis B. Despite the potent action of lamivudine, the development of new antivirals and new strategies to treat hepatitis B are still the major goal. We review the latest options for therapy of chronic hepatitis B, including combination strategies that could be an approach to improving the response rate of antivirals.