Preemptive lamivudine therapy based on HBV DNA level in HBsAg-positive kidney allograft recipients

A long term bone and renal safety of TAF treatment on renal transplant recipients

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

The data on tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is limited.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS: HBsAg-positive KTRs who received TAF between 2019 and 2022 were included in the analysis, categorized into treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced groups. Additionally, a subgroup of patients receiving ETV was analyzed for comparison.

RESULTS

Four treatment-naïve (Group I) and 35 treatment-experienced (Group II) patients received TAF for 26.4±11.3 and 43.7±19.0 months, respectively. Both groups showed significant HBV DNA reduction, but Group I achieved higher rates of undetectable HBV DNA (50%, 75%, 75%, 100% at 6, 12, 24, 30 months, compared with 16.7%, 25.3%, 31.4%, 34.7% in Group II, p=0.018). Renal allograft function remained stable during follow-up, and bone toxicity was minimal. For ETV, 10 patients demonstrated excellent viral suppression (HBV DNA undetectable in 70% at 48 weeks and 100% at 96 weeks) with stable renal function over a median of 5.2 years.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study with a lack of prospective comparison of TAF and ETV.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that TAF provides favorable efficacy, renal safety, and tolerability in KTRs. ETV also provided effective and sustainable viral suppression. TAF may offer additional advantages such as no concern of viral resistance and dose adjustment by eGFR levels for long-term management of HBsAg-positive KTRs.

Infections after organ transplantation and immune response

Organ transplantation has provided another chance of survival for end-stage organ failure patients. Yet, transplant rejection is still a main challenging factor. Immunosuppressive drugs have been used to avoid rejection and suppress the immune response against allografts. Thus, immunosuppressants increase the risk of infection in immunocompromised organ transplant recipients. The infection risk reflects the relationship between the nature and severity of immunosuppression and infectious diseases. Furthermore, immunosuppressants show an immunological impact on the genetics of innate and adaptive immune responses. This effect usually reactivates the post-transplant infection in the donor and recipient tissues since T-cell activation has a substantial role in allograft rejection. Meanwhile, different infections have been found to activate the T-cells into CD₄⁺ helper T-cell subset and CD₈⁺ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte that affect the infection and the allograft. Therefore, the best management and preventive strategies of immunosuppression, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and intensive medical care are required for successful organ transplantation. This review addresses the activation of immune responses against different infections in immunocompromised individuals after organ transplantation.

The Impact of Antiviral Treatment of Hepatitis B Virus after Kidney Transplant and the Latest Insights

BACKGROUND

The current frequency of hepatitis B virus infection in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) (including patients on maintenance dialysis and kidney transplant recipients) is low but not negligible worldwide. HBV has a deleterious effect on survival after a kidney transplant; antiviral treatments improved the short-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients, but their long-term impact remains uncertain.

AIM

The aim of this review is to assess the role of antiviral therapy for HBV in improving survival after a kidney transplant. The recent publication of large surveys has prompted us to update the available evidence on the impact of HBV on patient and graft survival after a kidney transplant.

METHODS

We have conducted an extensive review of the medical literature, and various research engines have been used.

RESULTS

We retrieved several studies (n = 11; n = 121,436 unique patients) and found an association between positive serologic HBsAg status and diminished patient and graft survival after a kidney transplant; the adjusted relative risk (aRR) of all-cause mortality and graft loss was 2.85 (95% CI, 2.36; 3.33, p < 0.0001) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.02; 1.51, p < 0.0001), respectively. To our knowledge, at least six studies reported improved patient and graft survival after the adoption of antiviral therapies for HBV (this result was reported with both survival curves and multivariable regression). According to novel clinical guidelines, entecavir has been suggested as a 'first line' antiviral agent for the treatment of HBV after a kidney transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

The recent availability of safe and effective antiviral drugs for the treatment of HBV has meant that the survival curves of HBsAg-positive patients on antiviral therapy and HBsAg-negative patients after a kidney transplant can be comparable. Antiviral therapy should be systematically proposed to HBV-positive kidney transplant recipients and candidates to avoid the deleterious hepatic and extra-hepatic effects of chronic HBV replication.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation: overview and management

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) can hide in the liver in the form of covalently closed circular DNA. When the body’s immunity changes, HBV reactivation (HBV-R) can occur. The risk of HBV-R is determined by the complex interaction among virological factors, medication factors and host factors. However, many patients do not know that they are infected with HBV, and doctors often do not invest enough time to systematically evaluate the patient’s HBV-R risk factors before immunosuppressive treatment. Therefore, HBV clinical screening should be vigorously promoted to achieve early detection and early prevention for patients with high risk of HBV-R. The mechanism, clinical features, risk factors, HBV-R under different disease etiologies, prevention and treatment of HBV-R were summarized to improve the in-depth understanding and awareness.

Influence of donor and recipient hepatitis B virus infection on long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The demand for transplantable kidneys continues to outstrip supply, and the risk of donor-derived infection limits utilization. The effect of donor or recipient HBV status, defined by surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity, on long-term survival outcomes of kidney transplant (KT) is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data from 2000 to 2019. We identified three cohorts based on donor (D) or recipient (R) HBsAg status: D-R, D-R+, and D+R-. Pairwise comparisons of patient survival (PS) and all-cause graft survival (GS) after propensity score matching were performed to assess the effect of HBV infection in KT recipients.

RESULTS

Our findings showed that there were no statistically significant differences in PS and GS among D-R, D-R+, and D+R-groups, nor was the patient or GS different between donor and recipient HBsAg+ status. Finally, in 2019 kidney discard rates were 15% higher for HBsAg+ deceased donors compared to HBsAg- donors.

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg+ status was not associated with worse PS or GS after KT. Prior to broadly advocating utilization of HbsAg+ kidneys, further studies assessing KT recipient morbidity and safety are necessary.

Efficacy and safety of peginterferon alpha monotherapy in Chinese inactive chronic hepatitis B virus carriers

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The effectiveness and safety of peginterferon alpha (peg-IFN-α) monotherapy in inactive hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers (IHCs) have not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

This observational study prospectively enrolled 298 IHCs in China from 2015 to 2019. Participants were given the right to choose to either receive peg-IFN-α monotherapy (treatment group, n = 142) or be monitored without treatment (control group, n = 156) according to their wishes. The scheduled treatment duration was 48 weeks. All participants were followed up to 72 weeks. The main efficacy endpoint was hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance at 72 weeks.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. At 72 weeks, intention-to-treat analysis showed that the rates of HBsAg clearance and seroconversion of the treatment group were 47.9% (68/142) and 36.6% (52/142), respectively, which were significantly higher than the HBsAg clearance rate of 1.9% (3/156) and the seroconversion rate of 0.6% (1/156) in the control group (both P < .001). Baseline HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL, lower HBsAg levels at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks, alanine aminotransferase elevation at 12 weeks, and greater HBsAg reduction from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks were independent predictors of HBsAg clearance. Generally, the therapy was well tolerated. Only five participants discontinued therapy as a result of peg-IFNα-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Peg-IFN-α monotherapy results in high rates of HBsAg clearance and seroconversion and the treatment is safe for IHCs.

Outcome after kidney transplantation in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients

Few reports detail the actual outcome of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen-positive patients after kidney transplant. HBsAg-positive patients who underwent kidney transplant between January, 1999, and December, 2018, were reviewed retrospectively. Outcomes including hepatitis B reactivation rate, risk factors for reactivation, and patient and graft survival rates were analyzed. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled (47.1 ± 11.5 years old). Patients received ABO-incompatible (n = 5), crossmatch positive transplant (n = 2), and re-transplant (n = 4). Forty-six patients received prophylactic; 19, medication at least 3 months before the transplant; and 12, did not receive medication. Seventeen out of 76 patients developed reactivation post-transplant. 52.9% of HBV reactivation was accompanied by hepatitis. Inappropriate, other than lifelong prophylactic, antiviral agents (HR = 7.34, 95% CI 1.51–35.69, P = 0.01) and high hepatitis DNA (≥ 1000 IU/ml) pre-transplant (HR = 4.39, 95% CI 1.08–17.81, P = 0.04) increased reactivation risk. There was no significant difference in patient and graft survival between antigen positive patients who received antiviral agent and propensity score matched negative patients. HBsAg positivity in kidney transplant recipients is associated with substantial HBV reactivation rate. Lifelong antiviral therapy is mandatory, and patients with high preop HBV titer should be monitored closely for HBV reactivation.

Immunogenicity and safety of a high-dose and prolonged-schedule hepatitis B vaccine among chronic kidney disease patients: a randomized, parallel-controlled trial

Background: The immunogenicity against hepatitis B vaccine is unsatisfactory in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, and studies evaluating augmented vaccine regimens to enhance immunogenicity have been inconclusive.Objectives: To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of four-standard-dose and four-triple-dose regimens hepatitis B vaccine among CKD patients in China.Research design and methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled trial including 273 patients with CKD who were randomly allocated to receive 3 or 4 doses of 20 or 60 µg of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine.Main outcome measures: Seroconversion rates, high-level response rates, and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of anti-HBs at months 3 and 7.Results: The seroconversion rates and high-level responses in the IM20 × 4 group and the IM60 × 4 group were higher than those in the IM20 × 3 group at months 3 and 7 (P < 0.05). The IM60 × 4 group had better immune responses than the IM20 × 4 group at month 3 (P < 0.05); however, no significant difference was noted at month 7 (P > 0.05).Conclusions: Both the four-standard-dose and four-triple-dose regimens improved immune response compared to the three-standard-dose regimen of hepatitis B vaccination in CKD patients, and the additional effect of higher dose was minimal.Trial registration: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT03962881).

Vaccination in patients with chronic kidney disease-Review of current recommendations and recent advances

Hepatitis B virus (HBV), influenza, pneumococcus and herpes zoster are important infections which could result in significant morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). While seroconversion rates after vaccination are often lower in CKD patients compared with healthy adults due to impaired innate and adaptive immunity, vaccinations for HBV, influenza, pneumococcus and herpes zoster are generally effective in reducing the transmission and/or severity of these infections. Practical issues that have an impact on the efficacy of vaccination in the CKD population include the timing, dose, schedule of vaccination, the route of administration, and adjuncts applied at time of vaccination. This review discusses the vaccination regimens and the efficacy of HBV, influenza, pneumococcus and zoster vaccines in CKD patients, and highlights recent advances in enhancing vaccine seroconversion rates.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Children With Acquired Immunodeficiencies or Undergoing Immune Suppressive, Cytotoxic, or Biological Modifier Therapies

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a known complication of immune-suppressive, cytotoxic, and biological modifier therapies in patients currently infected with HBV or who have had past exposure to HBV. Nowadays, newer and emerging forms of targeted biologic therapies are available for the management of rheumatologic conditions, malignancies, inflammatory bowel disease, dermatologic conditions and solid-organ, bone marrow, or haematologic stem cell transplant but there is currently a lack of a systematic approach to the care of patients with or at risk of HBV reactivation. The Hepatology Committee of the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) together with a working group of ESPGHAN members with clinical and research expertise in viral hepatitis developed an evidence-based position paper on reactivation of HBV infection in children identifying pertinent issues addressing the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of this condition. Relevant clinical questions were formulated and agreed upon by all the members of the working group. Questions were answered and positions were based on evidence resulting from a systematic literature search on PubMed and Embase from their inception to July 1, 2019. A document was produced and the working group and ESPGHAN Hepatology Committee members voted on each recommendation, using a formal voting technique. A recommendation was accepted provided upon agreement by at least 75% of the working group members. This position paper provides a comprehensive update on the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of HBV reactivation in children.

Telbivudine for renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B infection: a randomized controlled trial with early termination

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze changes in renal function in HBsAg-positive renal transplant recipients receiving lamivudine who did or did not switch to telbivudine.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT), HBsAg-positive renal transplant recipients who had received lamivudine prophylaxis for at least 6 months were 1:2 randomized to receive either lamivudine or telbivudine for another 24 months. Renal function was evaluated by creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the time of randomization (baseline), 6, 12, 18, and 24 months respectively.

RESULTS

This RCT was prematurely terminated after recruiting only 17 patients due to a high incidence (61.5%; 8/13) of clinical myalgia in the telbivudine group. Cox's proportional hazards model revealed that there was no independent predictor of myalgia. Based on intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses using generalized estimating equations, the patients in the randomized telbivudine group had a significantly increased eGFR and the patients in the lamivudine group had a significantly decreased eGFR at the end of follow-up compared to the values at study enrollment. However, there was no significant difference between the lamivudine and telbivudine groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The renal protective effect of telbivudine for HBsAg positive renal transplant recipients was uncertain for high incidence of myalgia and only patients who were on telbivudine for 24 months had renal function maintenance.

Long-term data on entecavir treatment for treatment-naive or lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B infection in kidney transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Entecavir (ETV) showed short-term efficacy and safety in HBsAg-positive kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), but long-term data are lacking.

METHODOLOGY

We retrospectively reviewed 30 HBsAg-positive KTRs who received ETV during 2007-2017.

RESULTS

Eighteen treatment-naïve (Group I) and 12 lamivudine-resistant (Group II) patients received ETV for 48.4 ± 35.2 and 66.0 ± 26.0 months, respectively. Both groups show significant HBV DNA decline, but Group I achieved earlier undetectability after 11.9 ± 9.6 months (compared with 28.8 ± 24.2 months in Group II, P = .033). Group I showed higher rates of undetectable HBV DNA (89%, 94%, 94%, 100%, and 100% at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, respectively, compared with 25%, 50%, 50%, 91%, and 91% in Group II, P = .003). ALT normalized after 6.0 ± 1.9 and 6.8 ± 2.1 months in Group I and Group II, respectively. Four patients (33.3%) in Group II developed drug resistance (2 had persistent viraemia and 2 had virological breakthrough, at 40.3 ± 15.0 months). Group II showed higher liver stiffness after 5 years (7.7 ± 4.1 kPa, compared with 5.0 ± 1.6 kPa in Group I, P = .046) and incidence of cirrhosis (4 patients [33.3%], compared with 1 [5.6%] patient in Group I, P = .049). Two patients (one in each group) developed hepatocellular carcinoma. Renal allograft function remained stable during follow-up of 63.2 ± 33.4 months for both groups. There was no difference in patient and graft survival between two groups at 5 years (P = .62 and .36, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ETV showed favorable long-term efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naïve KTRs. One-third of lamivudine-resistant subjects showed non-response or viral breakthrough after ETV treatment.

Taiwan consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B

The experts of Taiwan Association for the Study of Liver (TASL) have actively participated and led the guidelines on hepatitis B virus (HBV) management by Asian Pacific Association for the Study of Liver (APASL) which is the first international association for the study of liver to publish the statement on HBV management before. However, there are more and more new data on the natural history and treatment of HBV infection in the past decade. These include new application of an old biomarker (quantitative HBsAg), clinical significance of HBV genotype and naturally occurring mutations, the role of non-invasive examination in evaluating severity of hepatic fibrosis, clinical significance of outcome calculators, new drug or new combination strategies towards more effective therapy and organ transplantation including liver and non-liver transplantation. It is time to publish the guidelines on HBV management of Taiwan. Hence, TASL have conducted an expert meeting to review, to discuss and to debate the relevant literatures, followed by draft the manuscript of HBV management guidelines and recommendations. The guidelines include general management, indications for fibrosis assessment, time to start or stop drug therapy, choice of drug to initiate therapy, when and how to monitor the patients during and after stopping drug therapy. Recommendations on the therapy of patients in special circumstances, including women in childbearing age, patients with antiviral drug resistance, concurrent viral infection, hepatic decompensation, patient receiving immune suppression or chemotherapy and patients in the setting of liver transplantation and hepatocellular carcinoma, are also included.

Outcomes of Renal Allograft Recipients With Hepatitis B From January 2000 to December 2010

OBJECTIVE

The author evaluated graft and patient outcomes of renal allograft recipients with hepatitis B infection at National Kidney and Transplant Institute from January 2000 to December 2010.

METHODS

Retrospective study with patients who underwent renal transplant with HBV infection and group of HBV-negative patients in the same post-transplantation period. Data were gathered from the patients' in-hospital and out-patient clinic records and the MEDSYS database.

RESULTS

A total of 38 renal transplant recipients were followed up. Hepatitis B cases had a 410% increased risk of having graft failure compared to hepatitis B-negative patients. The mean duration of graft survival was 145.26 (±60.40) months (12 years) in HBV negative compared to 134.29 (±67.94) months (11 years) in HBV-positive post-transplant patients. There was no difference between hepatitis B-positive and B-negative groups in terms of patient survival. The mean duration of patient survival was 156.97 (±60.62) months (13 years) in HBV negative compared to 157.37 (±61.09) months (13 years) in HBV positive post-transplant patients. There was also no significant difference in the mean values of the glomerular filtration rate and level of proteinuria between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although patient survival was similar in both groups, there was increased risk of graft failure in hepatitis B-positive patients.

Does Induction Type Influence Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients at Different Phases of Hepatitis B Infection?

OBJECTIVES

Immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients with hepatitis B virus infection may increase the risk of disease progression. Here, we compared outcomes of depleting (antithymocyte globulin/alemtuzumab) versus nondepleting (basiliximab/daclizumab) antibody induction in kidney transplant recipients at different serologic phases of hepatitis B virus infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database to identify adult kidney transplant recipients at different serologic phases of hepatitis B virus infection (transplants received from 2001-2011 after patients received perioperative induction with discharge on calcineurin inhibitors/mycophenolate mofetil with/without steroids). We used a Cox model to compare outcomes among patient groups.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 50.7 months (range, 28.6 to 82.6 mo). Serologic phase for the 7681 study patients were as follows: 1098 at HBsAg+/anti-HBc- (depleting = 652, nondepleting = 446), 446 at HBsAg+/anti-HBc+ (depleting = 250, nondepleting = 216), and 6117 at HBsAg-/anti-HBc+ (depleting = 3562, nondepleting = 2555) (where anti-HBc denotes hepatitis B core antibody, HBsAg denotes hepatitis B surface antigen, and +/- denote positive/negative). When we compared those with depleting versus nondepleting agents, hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for adjusted overall graft, death-censored graft, and patient survival were 0.97 (0.78-1.26; P = .86), 1.20 (0.83-1.60; P = .44), and 0.92 (0.66-1.30; P = .51) in the HBsAg+/anti-HBc-; 0.81 (0.55-1.18; P = .27), 0.59 (0.32-1.12; P = .11), and 0.95 (0.60-1.49; P = .83) in the HBsAg+/anti-HBc+; and 0.96 (0.86-1.05; P = .37), 0.95 (0.60-1.49; P = .97), and 0.92 (0.80-1.05; P = 0.22) in the HBsAg-/anti-HBc+ groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study did not show adverse graft and patient outcomes associated with depleting versus nondepleting antibody induction in kidney transplant recipients at different phases of hepatitis B virus infection. This supports the selection and use of induction agents based on immunologic risk in such patients.

Outcomes of kidney transplantation in patients with hepatitis B virus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To assess outcomes of kidney transplantation including patient and allograft outcomes in recipients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and the trends of patient's outcomes overtime.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database from inception through October 2017. Studies that reported odds ratios (OR) of mortality or renal allograft failure after kidney transplantation in patients with HBV [defined as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive] were included. The comparison group consisted of HBsAg-negative kidney transplant recipients. Effect estimates from the individual study were extracted and combined using random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. The protocol for this meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; no. CRD42017080657).

RESULTS

Ten observational studies with a total of 87623 kidney transplant patients were enrolled. Compared to HBsAg-negative recipients, HBsAg-positive status was significantly associated with increased risk of mortality after kidney transplantation (pooled OR = 2.48; 95%CI: 1.61-3.83). Meta-regression showed significant negative correlations between mortality risk after kidney transplantation in HBsAg-positive recipients and year of study (slopes = -0.062, P = 0.001). HBsAg-positive status was also associated with increased risk of renal allograft failure with pooled OR of 1.46 (95%CI: 1.08-1.96). There was also a significant negative correlation between year of study and risk of allograft failure (slopes = -0.018, P = 0.002). These associations existed in overall analysis as well as in limited cohort of hepatitis C virus-negative patients. We found no publication bias as assessed by the funnel plots and Egger's regression asymmetry test with P = 0.18 and 0.13 for the risks of mortality and allograft failure after kidney transplantation in HBsAg-positive recipients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Among kidney transplant patients, there are significant associations between HBsAg-positive status and poor outcomes including mortality and allograft failure. However, there are potential improvements in patient and graft survivals in HBsAg-positive recipients overtime.

Lamivudine in the Treatment of HBV-related Liver Disease after Renal Transplantation: An Update

Diminished survival due to hepatitis B has been observed after renal transplantation (RT). Lamivudine, a second-generation nucleoside analogue, has been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with normal renal function. Numerous clinical experiences with lamivudine after RT have been recently published. Despite numerous shortcomings, all of these reports have shown encouraging results. The rate of clearance of HBV viremia ranged between 67% and 100%, and the frequency of ALT normalization was between 50% and 100% with lamivudine use. Even patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, a serious form of HBV-related liver disease with ominous course, have been successfully treated with lamivudine. Lamivudine therapy significantly improved the survival of HBsAg positive renal allograft recipients. However, numerous issues concerning the treatment of hepatitis B after RT remain unclear: the optimal time to initiate lamivudine, the appropriate duration of antiviral therapy after RT, and the role for pre-transplantation liver biopsy. Also, the management of lamivudine resistance remains a concern for physicians. Clinical trials are under way.

Infection in Kidney Transplantation

Infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. It has been estimated that 70% of kidney transplant recipients will experience an infection episode within the first 3 years after transplantation (Dharnidharka et al. 2007). After cardiovascular disease, infection is the second leading cause of death in recipients with allograft function (Snyder et al. 2009). The immunosuppressive therapy required to prevent organ rejection places the kidney transplant recipient at increased risk for donor-derived, nosocomial, and community-acquired infections as well as reactivation of latent pathogens. Pretransplant screening, immunizations, and optimal antibacterial and antiviral prophylaxis can help to reduce the impact of infection. Awareness of the approach to infection in the transplant recipient including diagnostic and management strategies is essential to optimizing outcomes.

Hepatitis B in renal transplant patients

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) poses a significant challenge for both dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients despite its decreasing rates, especially in developed countries. The best preventive method is vaccination. Patients with chronic renal disease should ideally be vaccinated prior to dialysis, otherwise, reinforced vaccination practices and close antibody titer monitoring should be applied while on dialysis. HBV infected dialysis patients who are renal transplant candidates must be thoroughly examined by HBV-DNA, and liver enzyme testing and by liver biopsy. When needed, one must consider treating patients with tenofovir or entecavir rather than lamivudine. Depending on the cirrhosis stage, dialysis patients are eligible transplant recipients for either a combined kidney-liver procedure in the case of decompensated cirrhosis or a lone kidney transplantation since even compensated cirrhosis after sustained viral responders is no longer considered an absolute contraindication. Nucleoside analogues have led to improved transplantation outcomes with both long-term patient and graft survival rates nearing those of HBsAg(-) recipients. Moreover, in the cases of immunized HBsAg(-) potential recipients with concurrent prophylaxis, we are enabled today to safely use renal grafts from both HBsAg(+) and HBsAg(-)/anti-HBc(+) donors. In so doing, we avoid unnecessary organ discarding. Universal prophylaxis with entecavir is recommended in HBV kidney recipients and should start perioperatively. One of the most important issues in HBV(+) kidney transplantation is the duration of antiviral prophylaxis. In the absence of robust data, it seems that prophylactic treatment may be discontinued in selected stable, low-risk recipients during maintenance immunosuppression and should be reintroduced when the immune status is altered. All immunosuppressive agents in kidney transplantation can be used in HBV(+) recipients. Immunosuppression is intimately associated with increased viral replication; thus it is important to minimize the total immunosuppression burden long term.

Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Patients Exposed to Hepatitis B Virus: Analysis by Phase of Infection

BACKGROUND

In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, immunosuppression may increase viral replication with increased risk for liver disease progression and HBV-related kidney diseases, factors that could adversely influence graft and patient outcomes. We aimed to analyze the impact of different phases of HBV infection on the outcomes in KTRs.

METHODS

Using the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database, we selected adult KTRs from 2001 to 2011 who received peri-operative antibody induction followed by calcineurin inhibitor/mycophenolate mofetil maintenance with/without steroid. The cohort was divided into 4 groups, based on the presence/absence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and core antibody (HBcAb) at the time of transplantation: group 1: HBsAg+/HBcAb- (acute infection); group 2: HBsAg+/HBcAb+ (developing immune response); group 3; HBsAg-/HBcAb+ (resolving infection); and group 4: HBsAg-/HBcAb- (HBV-naive). Graft and patient survivals were compared among the groups in a multivariate Cox model.

RESULTS

Adjusted overall graft (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.10; P = .58) and patient (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83-1.09; P = .52) survival rates were similar between groups 1 and 2, with inferior death-censored graft survival in group 1 (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98; P = .02). Adjusted over all graft (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00; P = .46) and patient (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.90-1.10; P = .10) survival rates were similar between groups 3 and 4, and death-censored graft survival trended inferior in group 3 (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00; P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis supports a practice of delaying kidney transplantation in HBV-infected patients until they develop an immune response and preferably until the infection is cleared.

Use of telbivudine in kidney transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A preliminary experience

Telbivudine is a relatively novel oral nucleoside analogue with favourable efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but its data in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) was lacking. The efficacy and tolerability of telbivudine in four treatment-naïve HBsAg-positive KTRs were reviewed (treatment duration 54 (36-72) months) HBV DNA declined from 2.6 × 10(5) (7.8 × 10(3) -1.5 × 10(7) ) copies/mL at baseline to 170 (0.0-3.2 × 10(4) ) copies/mL at 12 months, and became undetectable at 24 and 36 months (P = 0.060, 0.118 and 0.005 compared with baseline). Alanine aminotransferase levels dropped from 46.5 (30-48) IU/mL at baseline to 28 (13-45) IU/mL, 34.5 (15-71) IU/mL and 26 (12-41) IU/mL at 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively (P = 0.109, 0.715 and 0.068 compared with baseline). Serum creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remained stable after 36 months of treatment (P all > 0.05 compared with baseline). No virological breakthrough, cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma occurred. Our pilot data suggests that telbivudine has favourable efficacy and renal safety profiles in HBsAg-positive KTRs.

Post-transplant withdrawal of lamivudine results in fatal hepatitis flares in kidney transplant recipients, under immune suppression, with inactive hepatitis B infection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the consequences of lamivudine withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients, under immunosuppression, with inactive hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

INTRODUCTION

HBV infection is more frequent in kidney transplant recipients than in the general population mainly due to the high risk of acquisition during dialysis, before kidney transplantation.

METHODS

The records of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive, immunosuppressed kidney transplant recipients, where lamivudine was withdrawn after transplantation along with reduction in immunosuppressant dose, admitted to our hospital between 2005 and 2012, were retrospectively evaluated.

DISCUSSION

Three patients aged 33, 42 and 33, experienced hepatitis flares 2-3 months after lamivudine withdrawal. Serum HBV DNA levels were 2.5×10⁷, 3.4×10⁴ and 4×10³ IU/ml in cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Lamivudine was re-initiated in all cases which led to rapid viral suppression. However, liver function continued to deteriorate leading to severe jaundice, coagulopathy and encephalopathy. All patients died of acute liver failure within six months after the onset of withdrawal hepatitis.

CONCLUSION

Lamivudine should be continued as long as immunosuppressive therapy lasts.

Implementation of an in-house quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction method for Hepatitis B virus quantification in West African countries

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. HBV infection is diagnosed by serological tests, while real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays are used to quantify viral load, which is a crucial parameter to determine viral replication and to monitor antiviral treatments. However, measuring viral load in resource-limited countries remains nonsystematic, due to the high cost of commercial kits. Here, we describe the development, validation and implementation of a low-cost, in-house qRT-PCR assay to monitor HBV viral load in chronic carriers enrolled in the PROLIFICA programme in the Gambia and Senegal. Over 1500 HBsAg-positive patients, including 210 chronically infected HBV patients, who were given antiviral treatment (tenofovir), were monitored by qRT-PCR using the SYBR Green- and HBV-specific primers. Twenty-four tenofovir-treated patients were followed up and their viral load was tested every 3 months over the 12-month experimental time course. Compared to commercial assays, our in-house assay was shown to be (i) highly reliable, with good intra- and interassay reproducibility over a wide range (45-4.5 × 108 copies mL-1 ), (ii) very similar in the viral loads detected (R2  = .90), (iii) highly sensitive, as it detected loads as low as 30 copies mL-1 (~5 IU mL-1 ), (iv) cheaper (2- to 3-fold), (v) easier to implement and (vi) more rapid. Based on our experience, we recommend this assay as a reliable alternative to commercial assays, for monitoring HBV viraemia in resource-limited, highly endemic countries to reduce the cost and technical obstacles associated with commercial kits.

High titers of anti-HBs prevent rituximab-related viral reactivation in resolved hepatitis B patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is associated with an increased risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for rituximab-related HBV reactivation in resolved hepatitis B patients, defined as HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive, and undetectable HBV DNA. Among 840 consecutive patients with CD20-positive B-cell lymphoma who received rituximab-based chemotherapy from 2003 through 2014 at Seoul National University Hospital, 732 patients were excluded because either anti-HBc was not assessed or they were HBsAg-seropositive. This retrospective study included 108 resolved hepatitis B patients. During a median 33.5-month follow-up period, eight cases of HBV reactivation occurred only among the patients with low anti-HBs titers (<100 mIU/ml) at baseline and those who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis. Using multivariate analyses, antiviral prophylaxis and baseline anti-HBs titers were the protective factors for HBV reactivation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90 and 0.95, respectively). Among those who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis, patients with high baseline anti-HBs (≥100 mIU/ml) experienced significantly lower risk of HBV reactivation (HR, 0.49; P = 0.006) than the patients with low baseline anti-HBs (<100 mIU/ml) whose cumulative HBV reactivation rates at 6 and 24 months after chemotherapy were 8.3% and 17.3%, respectively. High anti-HBs titer at baseline and antiviral prophylaxis prevented HBV reactivation, suggesting antiviral prophylaxis should be considered according to baseline anti-HBs titer. Meticulous follow-up for ALT and HBV DNA without antiviral prophylaxis might be possible for the patients with high baseline anti-HBs (≥100 mIU/ml).

Pharmaceutical management of hepatitis B and C in liver and kidney transplant recipients

The combination of hepatitis B immune globulin with entecavir or tenofovir (at least for a certain period of time) seems to be the most reasonable prophylaxis against recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation. Entecavir represents an attractive option for treatment of naïve kidney transplant recipients, because of its high efficacy and the low rates of resistance. However antiviral treatment should be individualized in the view of kidney function and the previous resistance. To date, new captivating therapeutic strategies could make interferon-free regimens viable for treatment of hepatitis C virus positive liver transplant recipients. The recent combinations of sofosbuvir with simeprevir or daclatasvir or ledipasvir plus/minus ribavirin have boosted the on treatment and sustained virological response to rates approaching 100% within liver transplant recipients with recurrent chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Preliminary data showed that the second generation direct oral antivirals could result to high treatment rates of recurrent CHC in kidney transplant recipients as well. Ongoing studies will clarify the optimal treatment of recurrent CHC in kidney transplant recipients.

Preemptive adefovir versus lamivudine for prevention of hepatitis B reactivation in chronic hepatitis B patients undergoing chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

This proof-of-concept study compared lamivudine (LAM) with a newer antiviral agent, adefovir dipivoxil (ADF), in preventing hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in chronic HBV patients undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients intended to undergo chemotherapy were randomized to receive either LAM 100 mg daily or ADF 10 mg daily. Anti-viral therapy was started 1 week prior to chemotherapy and until 6 months after completing chemotherapy. The primary outcome was HBV reactivation rate. All patients with viral breakthrough were screened for resistance mutations by direct sequencing.

RESULTS

Seventy treatment-naïve patients were consecutively randomized 1:1 to LAM or ADF. The median baseline HBV DNA levels were similar (LAM 3.36 vs. ADF 3.17 log10 copies/mL, p = 0.860). The median duration was 8.3 months on LAM and 10.6 months on ADF (p = 0.220). HBV reactivation was observed in 13/35 (37.1%) on LAM compared with 10/35 (28.6%) on ADF (p = 0.611). The median time to HBV reactivation was 4.6 and 8.1 months, on LAM and ADF respectively. Among these 13 patients, 8/13 (61.5%) on LAM had developed drug resistance mutations but none on ADF had developed drug resistance mutations to ADF (p = 0.003). Both drugs were well tolerated and no severe drug-related toxicities were reported.

CONCLUSION

In this randomized clinical study, adefovir and lamivudine demonstrated similar efficacy in preventing hepatitis B reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients undergoing chemotherapy. In patients whose hepatitis B reactivated, adefovir was associated with a lower resistance profile.

Antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B in renal transplant patients

Chronic hepatitis B infection is frequent in renal transplant patients. It negatively impacts long term outcomes reducing graft and patient survival. Current guidelines clearly define who needs treatment, when to start, what is the first line therapy, how to monitor treatment response, when to stop, and how patients must be controlled for its safety. There is some data showing a favorable safety and efficacy profile of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) treatment in the renal transplant setting. Entecavir, a drug without major signs of nephrotoxicity, appears to be the first option for NUC naïve patients and tenofovir remains the preferred choice for patients with previous resistance to lamivudine or any other NUC. Renal transplant recipients under antiHBV therapy should be monitored for its efficacy against HBV but also for its safety with a close renal monitoring. Studies including a large number of patients with long term treatment and follow up are still needed to better demonstrate the safety and efficacy of newer NUCs in this population.

Kidney transplantation alone in end-stage renal disease patients with hepatitis B liver cirrhosis: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KT) alone in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with hepatitis B virus liver cirrhosis (LC) is controversial. This study compared outcomes of KT in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients with ESRD with (LC group) and without LC (non-LC group).

METHODS

Outcomes were analyzed in 103 hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients with ESRD who underwent KT alone between 1997 and 2011. Ninety-one were in the non-LC group and 12 were in the LC group. Of the latter, eight were Child-Pugh (CP) class A and four were CP class B.

RESULTS

Baseline aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase levels were higher in the LC group. model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores were similar in patients with CP class A and class B, only serum albumin level was lower in CP class B. After KT, one CP class A patient showed an increase in the CP score from 5 to 10 points, MELD score from 22.3 to 44.1 points. The CP and MELD scores of the other 11 patients in the LC group did not increase. All four pre-KT CP class B patients were reclassified as class A after KT because of elevated serum albumin levels. Four patients in the LC group developed hepatocellular carcinoma at a median of 35 months (range, 20-57 months) after KT. The 5-year patient survival rate was similar in the LC and non-LC groups (100% vs. 94%, P=0.15). The incidence of pre-KT LC did not differ between survivors and nonsurvivors (11% vs. 18%, P=0.61). Occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma was significantly higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors.

CONCLUSION

Kidney transplantation alone may be safe in patients with compensated hepatitis B virus LC.

The role of tenofovir in preventing and treating hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in immunosuppressed patients. A real life experience from a tertiary center

INTRODUCTION/AIM

Patients who present HBV reactivation during immunosuppressive treatment are prone to develop life threatening decompensation of the liver function, therefore prophylaxis and treatment are strongly recommended. So far there are no data regarding the role of tenofovir in this context. Therefore, the aim of our study was to describe our "real life" experience with the use of tenofovir (TDF) in patients who underwent immunosuppressive treatment.

RESULTS

38 patients with immunosuppression received antiviral treatment with tenofovir (25 patients as prophylaxis and 13 patients as treatment of HBV reactivation). In all 25 patients in whom prophylactic treatment with tenofovir was administered no HBV flare occurred during immunosuppression and the levels of serum HBV-DNA became or remained undetectable during the follow up period (mean follow up 17.2 months, range 6-54). One patient experienced HBsAg seroconversion. In the 13 patients who exhibited HBV reactivation TDF treatment resulted in complete biochemical and virological response within 6 months except two patients with high pretreatment HBV-DNA levels who became HBV-DNA negative at 9 months. No exacerbation of liver disease or liver related death has been observed. One patient who presented with decompensated cirrhosis during HBV reactivation returned into a compensated state after treatment. No side effects of tenofovir have been documented.

CONCLUSION

Tenofovir seems to be highly effective and safe in the prophylaxis and rescue treatment of HBV reactivation in patients who receive immunosuppression therapy.

Factors affecting effectiveness of vaccination against hepatitis B virus in hemodialysis patients

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major global health problem. Despite the success of the general measures against blood transmitted infections in hemodialysis (HD) units, the prevalence of HBV infection among the HD patients is still high. Thus vaccination against HBV is indicating in this population. However, compared with the general population the seroprotection achieved in HD patients remains relatively low, at about 70%. In this review patient, HD procedure and vaccine-associated factors that affect the efficacy of HBV vaccination are analyzed. Also alternative routes of HBV vaccine administration as well as new and more immunogenic vaccine formulations are discussed. However, besides scientific progress, vigilance of HD physicians and staff regarding the general measures against the transmission of blood borne infections and the vaccination against HBV is also required for reducing the prevalence of this viral infection.

Entecavir treatment in kidney transplant recipients infected with hepatitis B

Although nucleotide/side analogs improve the clinical outcome of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (HBsAg+) kidney transplant recipients (KTR), a significant proportion of subjects have developed resistance to lamivudine (LAM). We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and tolerability of entecavir (ETV) in HBsAg+ KTR at Queen Mary Hospital during 2005-2013. Twenty-one patients (10 treatment-naïve, 11 with LAM resistance) were included (duration of ETV treatment 34.7 ± 22.9 months, range 6-75 months). ETV treatment led to a decline of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA titer compared to baseline and is more significant in the treatment-naïve group (treatment-naïve: p = 0.028, <0.001 and <0.001; LAM-resistant p = 0.273, 0.180, and 0.109 after 12, 24, and 36 months). The cumulative rate of HBV DNA undetectability at 12, 24, and 36 months was 60%, 100%, and 100% for treatment-naïve group, and 27%, 45%, and 45% for LAM-resistant group, respectively. Time-to-HBV DNA undetectability and time-to-alanine transaminase (ALT) normalization were 15.7 ± 4.6 and 12.6 ± 3.7 months for treatment-naïve patients, and 24.5 ± 4.2 and 28.2 ± 3.5 months for those with LAM resistance. Genotypic resistance to ETV emerged after 20.0 ± 3.5 months with increase in ALT and HBV DNA in two patients with LAM resistance, but was not observed in the treatment-naïve group. Allograft dysfunction, de novo cirrhosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma did not occur during follow-up.

Effect of prophylactic versus preemptive lamivudine treatment and tenofovir on HBsAg+ kidney transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection remains a clinical problem for HBsAg (+) kidney transplant recipients. Lamivudine is the approved treatment; however, there are contrary views about optimal initiation. In case of resistance, novel nucleoside analogs should be considered but experience is limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was a retrospective cohort study that included 58 HBsAg (+) kidney transplant recipients. Medical records were reviewed for nucleoside analogs, viral replication, and graft/hepatic functions. Prophylactic and preemptive lamivudine modalities were compared to reveal optimal initiation. Additionally, novel nucleoside analogs were evaluated for safety and efficacy.

RESULTS

The graft/patient survival rates for HBsAg (+) recipients were the same as those of hepatitis-free recipients (P = .18). Prophylactic group had 24 and the preemptive had 34 patients. In the prophylactic group, there were fewer hepatic dysfunctions (12.5% vs. 30%, P = .12), viral breakthroughs (16% vs. 32%, P = .17) and elevated alanine aminotransferase concentrations (37% vs. 52%, P = .24), however these did not reach statistical significance. Progressive hepatic dysfunction was observed in 5 patients. Treatment was altered to tenofovir (n = 4) and adefovir (n = 1), and adequate virologic/biochemical response was achieved. These nucleoside analogs were almost as safe as lamivudine, as there were no significant differences among proteinuria (4740 ± 9480 vs 1250 ± 430 mg/L; P = .60) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (1.23 ± 0.37 vs 1.10 ± 0.35 mL/s; P = .33) CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine is an efficient means of providing comparable graft/patient survival with hepatitis-free kidney transplant recipients. The prophylactic initiation of lamivudine may be better in preventing hepatic dysfunction. Tenofovir can be an effective and safe treatment for lamivudine-resistant kidney transplant recipients.

Μanagement of patients with hepatitis B and C before and after liver and kidney transplantation

New nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) with high genetic barrier to hepatitis B virus (HBV) resistance (such as entecavir, tenofovir) have improved the prognosis of patients with HBV decompensated cirrhosis and have prevented HBV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). NAs are considered the most proper approach for HBV infection in patients under renal replacement therapy but their doses should be adjusted according to the patient's creatinine clearance. In addition, physicians should be aware of the potential nephrotoxicity. However, patients with chronic hepatitis C and decompensated cirrhosis can receive only one therapeutic option before LT, as well as for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after LT, which is the combination of subcutaneous Peg-IFN and ribavirin. Generally, therapy for HCV after renal transplantation should be avoided. Although the optimal antiviral therapy for HCV infection has not been established, attention has turned to a new, oral direct acting antiviral treatment which marks a promising strategy in prognosis and in amelioration of these diseases.

Management of patients with hepatitis B who require immunosuppressive therapy

Patients with chronic HBV infection are at risk of reactivation of HBV should they require immunosuppressive therapies for a variety of clinical settings, including chemotherapy for patients with cancer, immunosuppression for solid organ and stem cell transplant recipients, and use of anti-CD20 antibodies, TNF inhibitors, or corticosteroids in patients with oncological, gastrointestinal, rheumatological or dermatological conditions. The key to preventing HBV reactivation is the identification of patients with HBV infection prior to immunosuppressive therapy, initiation of prophylactic antiviral therapy in patients at moderate or high risk of HBV reactivation, and close monitoring of other patients so that antiviral therapy can be initiated at the first sign of HBV reactivation. Unfortunately, many patients infected with HBV are unaware of their infection or risk factors, and physicians often do not have sufficient time to systematically assess patients for risk factors for HBV prior to starting immunosuppressive therapy. In this article, we review the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of HBV reactivation, and the efficacy of antiviral therapy in preventing its occurrence. We also propose an algorithm for managing patients with HBV infection who require immunosuppressive therapy.

Successful withdrawal of antiviral treatment in kidney transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B viral infection

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of antiviral therapy for kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains unclear. We reported the long-term outcomes after withdrawal of antiviral agent in KTR with chronic HBV infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive KTR with antiviral agents between January 2002 and January 2012. Antiviral treatments were withdrawn in patients who met all of the following 7 criteria: (i) no clinical and histologic evidence of cirrhosis, (ii) normal liver biochemistry, (iii) negative for both HBV DNA and hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg), (iv) no resistance to antiviral agent, (v) antiviral therapy > 9 months, (vi) maintenance dosage of immunosuppressant for > 3 months, and (vii) no history of acute rejection during recent 6 months. All patients were followed regularly at approximately 3-6 months for liver enzyme, viral markers, and HBV DNA level after antiviral withdrawal.

RESULTS

Among a total of 445 KTR, 14 HBsAg-positive patients were included in this study. Antiviral agents were used, with lamivudine in 11 patients, and with adefovir, entecavir, and telbivudine in 3 patients, respectively. Discontinuation of antiviral agent was attempted in 6 (42.9%) of 14 patients who satisfied the criteria. The median duration of antiviral therapy before withdrawal was 14.3 months (range, 9-24 months). Four (66.7%) of 6 patients were successfully withdrawn and remained negative for HBV DNA for a median 60.5 months (range, 47-82 months). The baseline HBV DNA level was not related to maintenance of remission after withdrawal. Two reactivated patients resumed antiviral treatment immediately, with subsequent normalization of HBV DNA. During the follow-up, 1 patient developed hepatocellular carcinoma; however, no patient death or graft failure was reported for all HBsAg-positive KTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiviral therapy can be discontinued successfully and safely in selected KTR with chronic HBV infection, after complete suppression of HBV and sufficient duration of antiviral therapy.

Evolution of hepatitis B management in kidney transplantation

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection adversely influences the clinical outcomes of renal transplant recipients owing to increased hepatic complications. Management of HBV infection in kidney transplant recipients presents a challenge to clinicians, especially in endemic regions. Interferon precipitates renal allograft dysfunction. Treatment with lamivudine, the first oral nucleoside analogue available, resulted in effective viral suppression, reduced liver-related complications, and improved patient survival so that medium-term data showed comparable patient survival rates between hepatitis B surface antigen-positive and HBsAg-negative kidney transplant recipients in the era of effective antiviral therapies. Entecavir has replaced lamivudine as first-line therapy for treatment-naïve subjects in view of the propensity for drug resistance with the latter. Management of HBV infection in kidney transplant patients needs to take into consideration the nephrotoxicity of nucleoside/tide analogues such as adefovir and tenofovir. Prevention of HBV-related complications in kidney transplant recipients starts much earlier prior to transplantation, with vaccination of patients with chronic kidney disease and donor-recipient matching with regard to HBV status. In addition to anti-viral treatment, patients with chronic HBV infection must have regular surveillance for liver cancer and assessment for the development of cirrhosis.

Review article: nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection and chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

The treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is based on nucleoside (lamivudine, telbivudine, entecavir) or nucleotide (adefovir, tenofovir) analogues (NAs), but it may be complex and the information is scarce. Entecavir and tenofovir represent the currently recommended first-line NAs for NA-naive CHB patients, while tenofovir is the NA of choice for CHB patients with resistance to nucleosides.

AIM

To review the efficacy and safety of NAs in adult CHB patients with CKD and to provide reasonable recommendations for their optimal management.

METHODS

Literature search in PubMed/Medline and manual search of relevant articles, reviews and book chapters.

RESULTS

NAs are cleared by kidneys and their dosage should be adjusted in patients with creatinine clearance <50 mL/min. There are concerns about nephrotoxic potential of the nucleotides, particularly adefovir, while improvements of creatinine clearance have been reported under telbivudine. Most existing data in CHB patients with CKD are for lamivudine and, less frequently, for other NAs, mostly entecavir. Besides CHB, NA should be used in case of immunosuppressive therapy in any HBsAg-positive patient with CKD including renal transplant (RT) recipients and in anti-HBs-positive recipients of kidney grafts from HBsAg-positive donors.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic hepatitis B patients with chronic kidney disease receiving nucleoside analogues should be followed carefully for treatment efficacy and renal safety. Despite the absence of strong data, entecavir and telbivudine seem to be the preferred options for nucleoside analogue-naive CHB patients with chronic kidney disease, depending on viraemia and severity of renal dysfunction. More studies are certainly needed in this setting.

Comparison of clinical outcomes in hepatitis B virus-positive kidney transplant recipients with or without pretransplantation antiviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Antiviral agents have improved the outcomes of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Preemptive therapy has been the main approach to forestall HBV reactivation. We sought to compare prophylactic and preemptive approaches.

METHODS

We divided the 69 HBV-positive KTRs into treatment and historical control groups, according to the time of starting pretransplantation antiviral therapy. The treatment group was further divided into prophylactic and preemptive therapy groups.

RESULTS

The treatment group showed a significant improvement in 10-year graft (82% vs 34%) and patient (91% vs 57%) survivals. Among the historical control group, the main causes of graft failure were patient deaths (68%), which were mostly caused by liver diseases. In contrast, there was no liver-related death in the treatment group. In addition, there was no difference in graft or patient survival between the prophylactic and preemptive groups, but the incidence of HBV reactivation was lower in the prophylactic group. Antiviral therapy was an independent factor for the improved patient survival (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplantation antiviral therapy is essential to improve clinical outcomes. Prophylactic may be better than preemptive antiviral therapy to decrease HBV reactivation.

Prophylaxis of hepatitis B infection in solid organ transplant recipients

Rates of transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection from organ donors with HBV markers to recipients along with reactivation of HBV during immunosuppression following transplantation have fallen significantly with the advent of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) and effective antiviral therapy. Although the availability of potent antiviral agents and HBIg has highly impacted the survival rate of HBV-infected patients after transplantation, the high cost associated with this practice represents a major financial burden. The availability of potent antivirals with high genetic barrier to resistance and minimal side effects have made it possible to recommend an HBIg-free prophylactic regimen in selected patients with low viral burden prior to transplant. Significant developments over the last two decades in the understanding and treatment of HBV infection necessitate a re-appraisal of the guidelines for prophylaxis of HBV infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

Protocol for the use of light upon extension real-time PCR for the determination of viral load in HBV infection

Real-time PCR has engendered wide acceptance for quantitation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in the blood due to its improved rapidity, sensitivity, reproducibility, and reduced contamination. Here we describe a cost-effective and highly sensitive HBV real-time quantitative assay based on the light upon extension real-time PCR platform and a simple and reliable HBV DNA preparation method using silica-coated magnetic beads.

Hepatitis B-positive donors in renal transplantation: increasing the deceased donor pool

It is reasonable to transplant HbsAg-positive kidneys into recipients who are themselves hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg) positive with appropriate antiviral treatment after transplantation. Although there are limited data regarding the hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission risk following transplantation of kidneys from HbsAg-positive donors into HBV-immune recipients, current literature suggests that the risk of chronic infection in the recipient can be prevented by using antiviral agents or by boosting protective anti-HBs titers. The risk of chronic HBV infection following transplantation of kidneys from HbsAg-positive donors for HBV-naive recipients is high but can be minimized by administering lifelong antiviral therapy. Such a policy could be considered in an urgent situation. The most cost-effective antiviral prophylaxis strategy is lifelong lamivudine. Kidneys from HBsAg neg/anti-HBcore pos recipients are associated with a low rate of chronic HBV infection in the recipient and therefore can no longer be regarded as marginal donors. Booster vaccination to achieve protective HBV immunity or lifelong lamivudine therapy should prevent posttransplant HBV infection. Hence, we believe that strategies allowing transplantation of kidneys from donors with HBV can be undertaken safely with careful selection and matching of donors and recipients increasing access to kidney transplantation.