A hospital-acquired outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection initiated by a surgeon carrier

SHEA/IDSA/APIC Practice Recommendation: Strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infection in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update

Previously published guidelines have provided comprehensive recommendations for detecting and preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute-care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing efforts to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission and infection. This document updates the "Strategies to Prevent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission and Infection in Acute Care Hospitals" published in 2014.1 This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). It is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), the American Hospital Association (AHA), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise.

Analysis of microbial contamination during use and reprocessing of surgical instruments and sterile packaging systems

A surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common surgical complications. This study analyzed different sources of microorganisms in the air, on reusable surgical instruments, and the outer surface of sterile packaging systems during the use and reprocessing of sterile goods (from the operating room (OR) to the Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD)). The microbial load in the air was analyzed via active air sampling and settle plates. Furthermore, the airborne particle load was measured by a particle counter. Contact agar plates were used to determine the microbial load on surgical instruments and sterile packaging systems. The highest average microbial and particle load was measured in the air of the OR (active air sampling: max. 56 CFU/m3; settle plates: max. 9 CFU; ≥0.3 μm particles in size: 1,958,403 no./m3). However, no microbial load (0 CFU) was detected on surgical instruments sampled in the OR. The outer surface of stored sterile packaging systems showed a maximal microbial load of 64 CFU. The most common identified pathogen was coagulase-negative staphylococci. Compared to properly reprocessed reusable surgical instruments and sterile packaging systems, the air still seems to be the primary potential source of microbial contamination, especially within the OR.

Air quality in the operating room: Surgical site infections, HVAC systems and discipline - position paper of the German Society of Hospital Hygiene (DGKH)

In recent years, there has been an ongoing discussion about the value of laminar airflow (LAF=low turbulence displacement ventilation) in the operating room for prevention of surgical site infections (SSI). Some publications, e.g., from the WHO, issued the demand to no longer build LAF ceilings in operating rooms. The present statement deals critically with this position and justifies the use of LAF ceilings in different ways: Many of the papers cited by the WHO and others for the case against LAF do not provide reliable data.The remaining studies which might be used for answering the question give quite different results, also in favor of LAF.The size of the LAF ceiling in many studies is not given or mostly too small in comparison to actual technical requirements.LAF in different countries can mean quite different techniques (e.g., the US in comparison to Germany) so that the results of studies that do not take this into account may not be comparable.LAF has positive effects in terms of reducing particulate and bacterial load, associated with increased airflow in the surgical working area. A reduction of carcinogenic substances in the air may also be assumed, which would increase workers' safety. Thus, this paper recommends building LAF ceilings in the future as well, depending on the operations intended. Further, this paper gives an overview of possible reasons for surgical site infections and highlights the importance of discipline in the operating theatre.

Prevalence and distribution of adhesins and the expression of fibronectin-binding protein (FnbA and FnbB) among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Shahrekord Hospitals

Objective

One of the most important causes of nosocomial infections is Staphylococcus aureus. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of these genes and the rate of expression of these genes during nasal colonization among the personnel of Kashani and Hajar hospitals.

Results

In this Analytical-descriptive study, 240 nasal swab specimens were collected from personnel of different departments of Kashani and Hajar hospitals in Shahr-e-kord. Nasal specimens were cultured and 110 Staphylococcus strains were isolated. Based on the results, 110 carriers of Staphylococcus aureus were identified. The frequency of clfA, clfB, fnbA and fnbB genes were 36.3%, 86.3%, 7.2% and 43.6% respectively. It was also observed that the fnbA gene showed no expression, but of 95 clfB-positive samples, 73 isolates (76.8%) were expressed clfB gene. This study showed that the abundance of these genes varies in nasal colonization. It was also observed that clfB gene with a high frequency and high expression rate has an important role in nose colonization. These results not only provide insight into the factors involved in S. aureus colonization but also provide potential therapeutic targets.

Tracing and Preventing Infections

A total of 10–20% of somatic patients experience hospital infections during/after hospitalization. Pneumonia, sepsis, surgical site infections and urinary tract infections are most often associated with patient-related use of medical devices for approximately 65% of cases, while nontechnical equipment may be linked to 35% of cases. It is resource-intensive to detect the cause of infection outbreaks and even more expensive not to take action. Unexplained causes of outbreaks may lead to uncertainty and reduced activity at the hospital. To trace and prevent hospital outbreaks, joint efforts from hospital management, microbiology and infection control are needed. This chapter is focused on practical measures to trace and prevent hospital outbreaks.

Whole-genome epidemiology, characterisation, and phylogenetic reconstruction of Staphylococcus aureus strains in a paediatric hospital

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic pathogen and a leading cause of nosocomial infections. It can acquire resistance to all the antibiotics that entered the clinics to date, and the World Health Organization defined it as a high-priority pathogen for research and development of new antibiotics. A deeper understanding of the genetic variability of S. aureus in clinical settings would lead to a better comprehension of its pathogenic potential and improved strategies to contrast its virulence and resistance. However, the number of comprehensive studies addressing clinical cohorts of S. aureus infections by simultaneously looking at the epidemiology, phylogenetic reconstruction, genomic characterisation, and transmission pathways of infective clones is currently low, thus limiting global surveillance and epidemiological monitoring.

METHODS

We applied whole-genome shotgun sequencing (WGS) to 184 S. aureus isolates from 135 patients treated in different operative units of an Italian paediatric hospital over a timespan of 3 years, including both methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) from different infection types. We typed known and unknown clones from their genomes by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec), Staphylococcal protein A gene (spa), and Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL), and we inferred their whole-genome phylogeny. We explored the prevalence of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes in our cohort, and the conservation of genes encoding vaccine candidates. We also performed a timed phylogenetic investigation for a potential outbreak of a newly emerging nosocomial clone.

RESULTS

The phylogeny of the 135 single-patient S. aureus isolates showed a high level of diversity, including 80 different lineages, and co-presence of local, global, livestock-associated, and hypervirulent clones. Five of these clones do not have representative genomes in public databases. Variability in the epidemiology is mirrored by variability in the SCCmec cassettes, with some novel variants of the type IV cassette carrying extra antibiotic resistances. Virulence and resistance genes were unevenly distributed across different clones and infection types, with highly resistant and lowly virulent clones showing strong association with chronic diseases, and highly virulent strains only reported in acute infections. Antigens included in vaccine formulations undergoing clinical trials were conserved at different levels in our cohort, with only a few highly prevalent genes fully conserved, potentially explaining the difficulty of developing a vaccine against S. aureus. We also found a recently diverged ST1-SCCmecIV-t127 PVL- clone suspected to be hospital-specific, but time-resolved integrative phylogenetic analysis refuted this hypothesis and suggested that this quickly emerging lineage was acquired independently by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole genome sequencing allowed us to study the epidemiology and genomic repertoire of S. aureus in a clinical setting and provided evidence of its often underestimated complexity. Some virulence factors and clones are specific of disease types, but the variability and dispensability of many antigens considered for vaccine development together with the quickly changing epidemiology of S. aureus makes it very challenging to develop full-coverage therapies and vaccines. Expanding WGS-based surveillance of S. aureus to many more hospitals would allow the identification of specific strains representing the main burden of infection and therefore reassessing the efforts for the discovery of new treatments and clinical practices.

Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Colonization: An Update on Mechanisms, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Subsequent Infections

Up to 30% of the human population are asymptomatically and permanently colonized with nasal Staphylococcus aureus. To successfully colonize human nares, S. aureus needs to establish solid interactions with human nasal epithelial cells and overcome host defense mechanisms. However, some factors like bacterial interactions in the human nose can influence S. aureus colonization and sometimes prevent colonization. On the other hand, certain host characteristics and environmental factors can predispose to colonization. Nasal colonization can cause opportunistic and sometimes life-threatening infections such as surgical site infections or other infections in non-surgical patients that increase morbidity, mortality as well as healthcare costs.

The epidemiology and transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the community in Singapore: study protocol for a longitudinal household study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most common multidrug-resistant organisms in healthcare settings worldwide, but little is known about MRSA transmission outside of acute healthcare settings especially in Asia. We describe the methods for a prospective longitudinal study of MRSA prevalence and transmission.

METHODS

MRSA-colonized individuals were identified from MRSA admission screening at two tertiary hospitals and recruited together with their household contacts. Participants submitted self-collected nasal, axilla and groin (NAG) swabs by mail for MRSA culture at baseline and monthly thereafter for 6 months. A comparison group of households of MRSA-negative patients provided swab samples at one time point. In a validation sub-study, separate swabs from each site were collected from randomly selected individuals, to compare MRSA detection rates between swab sites, and between samples collected by participants versus those collected by trained research staff. Information on each participant's demographic information, medical status and medical history, past healthcare facilities usage and contacts, and personal interactions with others were collected using a self-administered questionnaire.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Understanding the dynamics of MRSA persistence and transmission in the community is crucial to devising and evaluating successful MRSA control strategies. Close contact with MRSA colonized patients may to be important for MRSA persistence in the community; evidence from this study on the extent of community MRSA could inform the development of household- or community-based interventions to reduce MRSA colonization of close contacts and subsequent re-introduction of MRSA into healthcare settings. Analysis of longitudinal data using whole-genome sequencing will yield further information regarding MRSA transmission within households, with significant implications for MRSA infection control outside acute hospital settings.

How Often Do Asymptomatic Healthcare Workers Cause Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusOutbreaks? A Systematic Evaluation

A systematic search was performed to identify outbreaks of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusinfection and colonization caused by healthcare workers (HCWs). Of 191 outbreaks identified, 11 had strong epidemiological evidence that HCWs were the source. In 3 of these outbreaks, asymptomatic carriers were the cause. The frequent practice of screening asymptomatic HCWs should be reconsidered.

Strategies to Prevent Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusTransmission and Infection in Acute Care Hospitals: 2014 Update

Previously published guidelines are available that provide comprehensive recommendations for detecting and preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) prevention efforts. This document updates “Strategies to Prevent Transmission of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusin Acute Care Hospitals,” published in 2008. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American Hospital Association (AHA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise. The list of endorsing and supporting organizations is presented in the introduction to the 2014 updates.

Methicillin Resistance and Risk Factors for Embolism inStaphylococcus aureusInfective Endocarditis

Objective.

Infective endocarditis caused byStaphylococcus aureusis an ominous prognosis associated with a high prevalence of embolic episodes and neurological involvement. Whether methicillin resistance decreases the risk of embolism in infective endocarditis is unclear. We sought to assess the association between methicillin resistance and risk factors for embolism in S.aureusinfective endocarditis.

Design.

Retrospective chart review. Data from patients with infective endocarditis due to methicillin-resistantS. aureus werecompared with data from patients with endocarditis due to methicillin-susceptibleS. aureus.Logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for embolism.

Setting.

A 2,000-bed, university-affiliated tertiary care hospital.

Patients.

Between 1995 and 2005, 123 patients withS. aureusinfective endocarditis were included in the study. There were 74 male patients and 49 female patients, with a median age of 54 years (range, 0-89 years).

Results.

Of 123 infections, 30 (24%) were nosocomial infections, and 14 (11%) were prosthetic valve infections. Of 123S. aureusisolates, 48 (39%) were methicillin resistant. In total, embolism occurred in 45 (37%) of these patients: pulmonary embolism in 22 (18%), cerebral embolism in 21 (17%), and peripheral embolism in 6 (5%). The independent risk factors for an embolism were injection drug use, presence of a cardiac vegetation with a size of 10 mm or greater, and absence of nosocomial infection. For 83 patients with aortic or mitral infective endocarditis, independent risk factors for an embolism were the presence of a cardiac vegetation with a size of 10 mm or greater and endocarditis due to methicillin-susceptibleS. aureus.Overall, in-hospital death occurred for 32 (26%) of 123 Patients. Methicillin-resistant infection was not an independent risk factor for death.

Conclusions.

Methicillin-resistant S.aureusinfection was associated with decreased risk of embolism in left-side endocarditis, but was not associated with in-hospital death.

Strategies to Prevent Transmission of Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusin Acute Care Hospitals

Previously published guidelines are available that provide comprehensive recommendations for detecting and preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Our intent in this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format to assist acute care hospitals in their efforts to prevent transmission of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA). Refer to the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America “Compendium of Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections” Executive Summary, Introduction, and accompanying editorial for additional discussion.

1. Burden of HAIs caused by MRSA in acute care facilities

a. In the United States, the proportion of hospital-associatedS. aureusinfections that are caused by strains resistant to methicillin has steadily increased. In 2004, MRSA accounted for 63% ofS. aureusinfections in hospitals.

b. Although the proportion ofS. aureus–associated HAIs among intensive care unit (ICU) patients that are due to methicillin-resistant strains has increased (a relative measure of the MRSA problem), recent data suggest that the incidence of central line–associated bloodstream infection caused by MRSA (an absolute measure of the problem) has decreased in several types of ICUs since 2001. Although these findings suggest that there has been some success in preventing nosocomial MRSA transmission and infection, many patient groups continue to be at risk for such transmission.

c. MRSA has also been documented in other areas of the hospital and in other types of healthcare facilities, including those that provide long-term care.

Effectiveness and cost of implementing an active surveillance screening policy for Acinetobacter baumannii: a Monte Carlo simulation model

BACKGROUND

Acinetobacter baumannii infections are common and associated with high mortality and costs. Early identification of asymptomatic carriers can reduce patient-to-patient transmission, but the sensitivity of A baumannii surveillance tools is poor, and thus active surveillance is not routine practice. This study examined whether an active surveillance screening policy can reduce the transmission, mortality, and costs associated with A baumannii.

METHODS

A simulation model was developed to determine the impact of active screening on patient outcomes. Model parameters included A baumannii prevalence, screening sensitivity and specificity, probability of transmission, progression from colonization to infection, mortality, and cost of screening, contact precautions, and infection. A scenario analysis was performed to evaluate the robustness of the results when varying the sensitivity of the screening test and the prevalence rate of A baumannii.

RESULTS

Assuming a screening sensitivity of 55%, active screening reduced A baumannii transmissions, infections, and deaths by 48%. As the screening sensitivity approached 90%, the reduction in transmissions, infections, and deaths reached 78%. For all scenarios tested, active surveillance was cost saving (19%-53% reduction in mean hospital cost per patient) except at a carrier prevalence of ≤2% and screening test sensitivity of ≤55%.

CONCLUSIONS

In institutions where A baumannii is endemic or during epidemics, implementing a surveillance program is cost-saving and can greatly reduce transmissions and deaths. Methodologies to improve the sensitivity of surveillance testing will help optimize the clinical impact of active screening programs on preventing the spread of A baumannii in health care facilities.

Prolonged outbreak of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a cardiac surgery unit linked to a single colonized healthcare worker

BACKGROUND

In low- as well as in high-prevalence settings, healthcare workers (HCWs) may be a substantial, under-recognized, reservoir of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and an important potential source of transmission to patients.

AIM

To report an outbreak of MRSA in a cardiac surgery unit in England over a 10-month period.

METHODS

Cases were defined as patients and staff on the cardiac surgery unit from whom the outbreak strain was newly isolated between 20 May 2011 and 16 March 2012. Representative isolates from all cases were characterized by spa-typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multi-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA).

FINDINGS

Four patients appeared to acquire MRSA during their inpatient stay on the cardiac surgery unit. All four patients and one HCW were found to be carrying an identical epidemic (E)MRSA-15 strain (spa t032, pulsotype A, MLVA profile 16-6-3-1-1-17-1-4). No other members of staff were found to be colonized with MRSA. The colonized HCW was thought to be the source of the outbreak and was decolonized using a combination of nasal mupirocin, chlorhexidine body wash and oral rifampicin and doxycycline.

CONCLUSIONS

This report highlights recent changes in the epidemiology of MRSA in England and suggests an important role for colonized HCWs in the transmission of MRSA to patients. Screening HCWs may provide an increasingly valuable strategy in managing linked hospital acquisitions and well-defined outbreaks where initial investigation does not reveal a source.

The prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus among out-of-hospital care providers and emergency medical technician students

OBJECTIVE

We compared the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrier rate among out-of-hospital care providers with greater than six months' experience in emergency medical services (EMS) care with that of emergency medical technician (EMT) students with two months or less of observation time as part of their clinical training.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study utilizing a convenience sample of out-of-hospital care providers and EMT students in an urban EMS system operating in the Midwest during October and November 2006. One hundred thirty-four out-of-hospital care providers and 152 EMT students were tested for MRSA susceptibility using the cefoxitin disk diffusion method.

RESULTS

Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not find a statistically significant difference in MRSA nasal colonization between out-of-hospital care providers (4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0, 8.0) and EMT students (5.3%; 95% CI 1.7, 8.8). A subgroup analysis showed that among out-of-hospital care providers, paramedics had a higher rate of nasal colonization than EMTs (5.6% vs. 2.2%).

CONCLUSION

We found that out-of-hospital care providers and EMT students had higher nasal colonization rates than the reported rate for the U.S. population (0.084% at the time the study was conducted and 1.5% currently). It is imperative that both groups adhere to infection control practices.

Severe methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections associated with epidural injections at an outpatient pain clinic

BACKGROUND

Recent outbreaks in ambulatory care settings have highlighted infection control breaches as risk factors for disease transmission. In May 2009, 3 patients were hospitalized with severe methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections after receiving epidural injections at a West Virginia outpatient pain clinic.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating clinic patients who received injections during a 3-week period. A case was defined as laboratory-confirmed infection or clinical evidence of infection ≤ 14 days after a patient received an injection. Infection control procedures were assessed. MSSA isolates from patient infections and clinic staff nasal swabs were genotyped by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

RESULTS

Eight (7%) of 110 cohort patients met the case definition; 6 (75%) cases were laboratory confirmed. Eight (12%) of 69 patients who received epidural injections were case patients compared with none of the other 41 patients (P = .02). During procedures, staff use of face masks and preparation of patient skin were suboptimal; epidural injection syringes were reused to access shared medication vials. MSSA isolates from 2 patients and 1 staff member were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

CONCLUSION

Infection control breaches likely facilitated MSSA transmission to patients receiving epidural injections. Adhering to correct infection control practices in ambulatory care settings is critical to prevent disease transmission.

Emergence of hospital- and community-associated panton-valentine leukocidin-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus genotype ST772-MRSA-V in Ireland and detailed investigation of an ST772-MRSA-V cluster in a neonatal intensive care unit

Sequence type 22 (ST22) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) harboring staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) IV (ST22-MRSA-IV) has predominated in Irish hospitals since the late 1990s. Six distinct clones of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) have also been identified in Ireland. A new strain of CA-MRSA, ST772-MRSA-V, has recently emerged and become widespread in India and has spread into hospitals. In the present study, highly similar MRSA isolates were recovered from seven colonized neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in a maternity hospital in Ireland during 2010 and 2011, two colonized NICU staff, one of their colonized children, and a NICU environmental site. The isolates exhibited multiantibiotic resistance, spa type t657, and were assigned to ST772-MRSA-V by DNA microarray profiling. All isolates encoded resistance to macrolides [msr(A) and mpb(BM)] and aminoglycosides (aacA-aphD and aphA3) and harbored the Panton-Valentine leukocidin toxin genes (lukF-PV and lukS-PV), enterotoxin genes (sea, sec, sel, and egc), and one of the immune evasion complex genes (scn). One of the NICU staff colonized by ST772-MRSA-V was identified as the probable index case, based on recent travel to India. Seven additional hospital and CA-ST772-MRSA-V isolates recovered from skin and soft tissue infections in Ireland between 2009 and 2011 exhibiting highly similar phenotypic and genotypic characteristics to the NICU isolates were also identified. The clinical details of four of these patients revealed connections with India through ethnic background or travel. Our study indicates that hospital-acquired and CA-ST772-MRSA-V is currently emerging in Ireland and may have been imported from India on several occasions.

Modeling the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) outbreaks throughout the hospitals in Orange County, California

BACKGROUND

Since hospitals in a region often share patients, an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in one hospital could affect other hospitals.

METHODS

Using extensive data collected from Orange County (OC), California, we developed a detailed agent-based model to represent patient movement among all OC hospitals. Experiments simulated MRSA outbreaks in various wards, institutions, and regions. Sensitivity analysis varied lengths of stay, intraward transmission coefficients (β), MRSA loss rate, probability of patient transfer or readmission, and time to readmission.

RESULTS

Each simulated outbreak eventually affected all of the hospitals in the network, with effects depending on the outbreak size and location. Increasing MRSA prevalence at a single hospital (from 5% to 15%) resulted in a 2.9% average increase in relative prevalence at all other hospitals (ranging from no effect to 46.4%). Single-hospital intensive care unit outbreaks (modeled increase from 5% to 15%) caused a 1.4% average relative increase in all other OC hospitals (ranging from no effect to 12.7%).

CONCLUSION

MRSA outbreaks may rarely be confined to a single hospital but instead may affect all of the hospitals in a region. This suggests that prevention and control strategies and policies should account for the interconnectedness of health care facilities.

Should healthcare workers be screened routinely for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus? A review of the evidence

Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is considered endemic in the UK National Health Service (NHS), and routine MRSA screening of hospital inpatients has recently been introduced in both Scotland and England. The UK National Screening Committee states that public pressure for widening the eligibility criteria of a proposed screening programme should be anticipated and any related decisions scientifically justifiable. A literature review was conducted to examine whether MRSA screening in Scotland should be expanded to include the routine screening of healthcare workers (HCWs). There are no published prevalence studies reporting the overall MRSA carriage rate in HCWs in NHS hospitals. Estimates of HCW carriage from the worldwide literature vary widely depending on the country, hospital specialty and setting (endemic, non-endemic or outbreak). Recent studies conducted in endemic hospital settings report non-outbreak carriage rates of 0-15%. The role of HCW carriage in the transmission of MRSA is not well understood. Persistent carriage could act as a reservoir for infection and HCWs have been implicated as the source in a number of published outbreak reports. There are no published controlled trials examining the impact of routine HCW screening as an intervention in the prevention and control of MRSA infections in the endemic hospital setting. Most of the evidence for HCW screening comes from outbreak reports where the outbreak was brought to an end following the introduction of staff screening as part of a suite of infection control measures. Further research is required before a recommendation could be made to introduce routine MRSA screening of HCWs in the NHS in Scotland.

Secular trends of healthcare-associated infections at a teaching hospital in Taiwan, 1981-2007

The National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) adopted international guidelines for surveillance and control of healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) in 1981. This report describes the secular trends in HCAI at the NTUH over the past 27 years according to site of infection, aetiological agents and control measures. Clinical and microbiological data were collected by infection prevention and control nurses using a standardised case-record form. Specific control programmes were implemented and/or intensified as needed. Poisson or negative binomial regression analysis was used to quantify time trends of the incidence of HCAI. The annual number of discharges increased from 25 074 to 91 234 with a parallel increase in the Charlson comorbidity index. Active HCAI surveillance and periodic feedback were associated with a marked decrease in surgical site infections from 1981 to 2007 (2.5 vs 0.5 episodes per 100 procedures, P < 0.0001). On the other hand, there was a 4.8-fold increase in bloodstream infections (BSIs) (0.39 vs 1.88 episodes per 100 discharges, P < 0.0001). The average annual increase of pathogen-specific HCAI incidence during 1981–2007 was 11.4% for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 75.4% for extensively drug-resistant A. baumannii (XDRAB), and 7.5% for Candida albicans (P < 0.0001, respectively). The infection prevention and control programme was upgraded in 2004 by implementing annual, intensive, project-based control programmes, and decreases in rates of HCAI, BSI, MRSA and XDRAB were observed. This long term study demonstrates the need to couple surveillance of HCAI with focused control programmes. Hospitals must invest in adequate manpower to accomplish these goals.

Molecular and epidemiological analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus otorrhoea: hospital- or community-acquired?

Objectives:

(1) To identify newly diagnosed cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ear infection in our local population; (2) to determine the risk factors involved in these patients' clinical courses, and (3) to type the bacterial strains isolated and thus identify whether they were hospital- or community-acquired.

Design and setting:

Retrospective review of case notes, together with laboratory-based molecular studies in the departments of otolaryngology and medical microbiology in a university teaching hospital in Scotland, UK.

Subjects:

Over a two-year period, 35 patients were identified with ear swabs positive for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. These cases came from both hospital and community settings.

Main outcome measures:

(1) Identification of primary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus otorrhoea in patients with no previously documented colonisation; and (2) molecular typing of the strains isolated, using spa technology, to identify whether they were hospital- or community-acquired.

Results:

Of the 35 positive patients, 27 were previously known carriers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The eight patients with newly diagnosed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus otorrhoea presented initially in the community. All of these patients had had contact with hospital staff (as in-patients or out-patients) in the weeks preceding development of their ear infection. Using the spa technique for molecular typing, we identified hospital-acquired (‘epidemic’) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus type 15 in all eight patients' isolates. All were sensitive to topical gentamicin.

Conclusions:

In our cohort, hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus type 15 was the commonest cause of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus otorrhoea, despite the fact that these patients all first presented in the community. We believe that contact with hospital staff or health care workers is a risk factor for acquiring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus otorrhoea in the community.

Prevalence and characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus colonization among healthcare professionals in an urban teaching hospital

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of asymptomatic carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) among healthcare professionals (HCPs) who experience varying degrees of exposure to ambulatory patients and to genetically characterize isolates.

METHODS

This single-center, cross-sectional study enrolled 256 staff from the intensive care units, emergency department, and prehospital services of an urban tertiary care university hospital in 2008. Occupational histories and nasal samples for S. aureus cultures were obtained. S. aureus isolates were genetically characterized with the use of spa typing and screened for mecA. MRSA isolates underwent further characterization.

RESULTS

S. aureus was isolated from 112 of 256 (43.8%) HCPs, including 30 of 52 (57.7%) paramedics, 51 of 124 (41.1%) nurses, 11 of 28 (39.3%) clerical workers, and 20 of 52 (38.5%) physicians. MRSA was isolated from 17 (6.6%) HCPs, including 1 (1.9%) paramedic, 13 (10.5%) nurses, 1 (3.6%) clerical worker, and 2 (3.8%) physicians. Among S. aureus isolates, 15.2% were MRSA. MRSA prevalence was 9.6% (12/125) in emergency department workers, 5.1% (4/79) in intensive care unit workers, and 1.9% (1/52) in emergency medical services workers. Compared with paramedics, who had the lowest prevalence of methicillin resistance among S. aureus isolates (1 of 30 [3.3%] isolates), nurses, who had the highest prevalence (13 of 51 [25.4%] isolates), had an odds ratio of 9.92 (95% confidence interval, 1.32-435.86; P = .02) for methicillin resistance. Analysis of 15 MRSA isolates revealed 7 USA100 strains, 6 USA300 strains, 1 USA800 strain, and 1 EMRSA-15 strain. All USA300 strains were isolated from emergency department personnel.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA colonization among HCPs exceeds previously reported prevalences in the general population. The proportion of community-associated MRSA among all MRSA in this colonized HCP cohort reflects the distribution of the USA300 community-associated strain observed increasingly among US hospitalized patients.

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage and risk factors for skin infections, Southwestern Alaska, USA

Skin infection risk was increased among MRSA nasal carriers.

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections are common in southwestern Alaska. Outbreak strains have been shown to carry the genes for Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL). To determine if carriage of PVL-positive CA-MRSA increased the risk for subsequent soft tissue infection, we conducted a retrospective cohort study by reviewing the medical records of 316 persons for 3.6 years after their participation in a MRSA nasal colonization survey. Demographic, nasal carriage, and antimicrobial drug use data were analyzed for association with skin infection risk. Skin infections were more likely to develop in MRSA carriers than in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus carriers or noncarriers of S. aureus during the first follow-up year, but not in subsequent years. Repeated skin infections were more common among MRSA carriers. In an area where PVL-containing MRSA is prevalent, skin infection risk was increased among MRSA nasal carriers compared with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus carriers and noncarriers, but risk differential diminished over time.

Hand hygiene for the prevention of nosocomial infections

BACKGROUND

The WHO regards hand hygiene as an essential tool for the prevention of nosocomial infection, but compliance in clinical practice is often low.

METHODS

The relevant scientific literature and national and international evidence-based recommendations (Robert Koch Institute [Germany], WHO) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Hygienic hand disinfection has better antimicrobial efficacy than hand-washing and is the procedure of choice to be performed before and after manual contact with patients. The hands should be washed, rather than disinfected, only when they are visibly soiled. Skin irritation is quite common among healthcare workers and is mainly caused by water, soap, and prolonged wearing of gloves. Compliance can be improved by training, by placing hand-rub dispensers at the sites where they are needed, and by physicians setting a good example for others.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved compliance in hand hygiene, with proper use of alcohol-based hand rubs, can reduce the nosocomial infection rate by as much as 40%.

The role of healthcare personnel in the maintenance and spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Healthcare workers may acquire methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from patients, both hospital and home environments, other healthcare workers, family and public acquaintances, and pets. There is a consensus of case reports and series which now strongly support the role for MRSA-carrying healthcare personnel to serve as a reservoir and as a vehicle of spread within healthcare settings. Carriage may occur at a number of body sites and for short, intermediate, and long terms. A number of approaches have been taken to interrupt the linkage of staff-patient spread, but most emphasis has been placed on handwashing and the treatment of staff MRSA carriers. The importance of healthcare workers in transmission has been viewed with varying degrees of interest, and several logistical problems have arisen when healthcare worker screening is brought to the forefront. There is now considerable support for the screening and treatment of healthcare workers, but it is suggested that the intensity of any such approach must consider available resources, the nature of the outbreak, and the strength of epidemiological associations. The task of assessing healthcare personnel carriage in any context should be shaped with due regard to national and international guidelines, should be honed and practiced according to local needs and experience, and must be patient-oriented.

Health-care workers: source, vector, or victim of MRSA?

There is ongoing controversy about the role of health-care workers in transmission of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We did a search of the literature from January, 1980, to March, 2006, to determine the likelihood of MRSA colonisation and infection in health-care workers and to assess their role in MRSA transmission. In 127 investigations, the average MRSA carriage rate among 33 318 screened health-care workers was 4.6%; 5.1% had clinical infections. Risk factors included chronic skin diseases, poor hygiene practices, and having worked in countries with endemic MRSA. Both transiently and persistently colonised health-care workers were responsible for several MRSA clusters. Transmission from personnel to patients was likely in 63 (93%) of 68 studies that undertook genotyping. MRSA eradication was achieved in 449 (88%) of 510 health-care workers. Subclinical infections and colonisation of extranasal sites were associated with persistent carriage. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of screening and eradication policies for MRSA control and give recommendations for the management of colonised health-care workers in different settings.

Controlling a multicenter outbreak involving the New York/Japan methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone

OBJECTIVE

To describe the control of an outbreak of infection and colonization with the New York/Japan methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clone in multiple healthcare facilities, and to demonstrate the importance of making an MRSA management policy involving molecular typing of MRSA into a statewide public health responsibility.

SETTING

A range of healthcare facilities, including 2 metropolitan teaching hospitals and a regional hospital, as well as several community hospitals and long-term care facilities in a nonmetropolitan healthcare region.

INTERVENTIONS

A comprehensive, statewide MRSA epidemiological investigation and management policy.

RESULTS

In May 2005, there were 3 isolates referred to the Western Australian Gram-Positive Bacteria Typing and Research Unit that were identified as the New York/Japan MRSA clone, a pandemic MRSA clone with the ability to spread and replace existing clones in a region. Subsequent investigation identified 28 additional cases of infection and/or colonization dating from 2002 onward, including 1 involving a colonized healthcare worker (HCW) who had previously been hospitalized overseas. Of the 31 isolates detected, 25 were linked epidemiologically and via molecular typing to the isolate recovered from the colonized HCW. Four isolates appeared to have been introduced separately from overseas. Although the isolate from the single remaining case patient was genetically indistinct from the isolates that spread within Western Australia, no specific epidemiological link could be established. The application of standard outbreak management strategies reduced further spread.

CONCLUSIONS

The elimination of the New/York Japan MRSA clone in a healthcare region demonstrates the importance of incorporating MRSA management policy into statewide public health programs. The mainstays of such programs should include a comprehensive and effective outbreak identification and management policy (including pre-employment screening of HCWs, where applicable) and MRSA clone identification by multilocus sequence typing.

Staphylococcus aureus, the major pathogen in orthopaedic and cardiac surgical site infections: a literature review

Due to the increasing number of orthopaedic and cardiac procedures, these units are considered as high-risk areas because of the potentially serious consequences of surgical site infections (SSI), primarily caused by Staphylococcus aureus. The goal of this review was to evaluate the impact of S. aureus on the incidence of SSI in these high risk wards. Studies were identified by a search on the MEDLINE literature using the following mesh terms: S. aureus, cardiac, orthopaedic, surgery, SSI. Beside, data from different surveillance systems were also included. Overall, biological investigation was performed only on a small proportion of identified SSIs. Of those identified, S. aureus represented the most common pathogen accounting for approximately 20% of all SSIs. Of the 59,274 hip prostheses reported from the HELICS surveillance network, S. aureus formed 48.6% of the pathogens (416 bacteria isolated). Similarly, it represented 43.7% of pathogens after coronary artery bypass grafting. Although S. aureus turned out to be the major pathogen, this work identifies the relative lack of knowledge on the overall incidence of S. aureus infections and on the impact of this pathogenic agent when taking into consideration the degree of wound contamination and category of SSI. There is a need for more detailed information on the role of S. aureus in the burden of surgical site infections and consequently how to establish multiple approach prevention programs.

Postoperative Wundinfektionen

Surgical site infections can be traced to discrepancies in one specific hospital department: the operating suite. Therefore, prevention is often viewed as resting completely on the surgeon. However, the source of micro-organisms responsible for surgical site infections can be endogenous or exogenous. Most infections are believed to be the former, i.e. caused by micro-organisms already resident in the patient's body. Therefore the surgeon can be regarded as suspect only in exceptional cases and usually himself a victim. Prevention is possible not only for exogenous surgical site infection but also many endogenous infections. A multicenter surveillance of infection rates at 130 operative departments participating for at least 4 years in the German National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System was conducted. A significant 25% reduction in the 3rd year was observed compared with patients who underwent surgery within the 1st year of participation. However, surgeons alone cannot achieve such a decrease, and a team approach is required under most circumstances.

Risk factors for nosocomial infective endocarditis in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are increasing. Only a few studies of MRSA infective endocarditis have been conducted, and none have reported its risk factors. We sought to determine the host-related risk factors for infective endocarditis in patients with nosocomial MRSA bacteremia.

SETTING

A 2,000-bed, university-affiliated, tertiary-care hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirty-one patients with nosocomial MRSA infective endocarditis between October 1996 and May 2003.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was conducted. Data were compared with those from a control group of patients with nosocomial MRSA bacteremia. Logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for nosocomial infective endocarditis.

RESULTS

Compared with patients who had nosocomial MRSA bacteremia and no infective endocarditis, patients who had infective endocarditis had a higher incidence of chronic liver disease and a lower incidence of immunodeficiency. The risk of developing infective endocarditis was approximately 10% for patients with nosocomial MRSA bacteremia.

CONCLUSION

Patients with MRSA bacteremia and underlying chronic liver disease were prone to infective endocarditis.

Outbreak of extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in a neonatal intensive care unit related to onychomycosis in a health care worker

Four cases of infection by extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae occurred in the neonatal intensive care unit. Isolation, empiric therapy change and education produced no effect. Newborn weekly colonization rates were 0-18.7%. One health care worker with onychomycosis was positive for extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae. Isolates were identical by molecular typing. Outbreak was controlled when the health care worker was excluded from the neonatal intensive care unit.

Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs

The etiology of nosocomial infections, the frequency of contaminated hands with the different nosocomial pathogens, and the role of health care workers' hands during outbreaks suggest that a hand hygiene preparation should at least have activity against bacteria, yeasts, and coated viruses. The importance of efficacy in choosing the right hand hygiene product is reflected in the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline on hand hygiene (J. M. Boyce and D. Pittet, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 51:1-45, 2002). The best antimicrobial efficacy can be achieved with ethanol (60 to 85%), isopropanol (60 to 80%), and n-propanol (60 to 80%). The activity is broad and immediate. Ethanol at high concentrations (e.g., 95%) is the most effective treatment against naked viruses, whereas n-propanol seems to be more effective against the resident bacterial flora. The combination of alcohols may have a synergistic effect. The antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine (2 to 4%) and triclosan (1 to 2%) is both lower and slower. Additionally, both agents have a risk of bacterial resistance, which is higher for chlorhexidine than triclosan. Their activity is often supported by the mechanical removal of pathogens during hand washing. Taking the antimicrobial efficacy and the mechanical removal together, they are still less effective than the alcohols. Plain soap and water has the lowest efficacy of all. In the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline, promotion of alcohol-based hand rubs containing various emollients instead of irritating soaps and detergents is one strategy to reduce skin damage, dryness, and irritation. Irritant contact dermatitis is highest with preparations containing 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, less frequent with nonantimicrobial soaps and preparations containing lower concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate, and lowest with well-formulated alcohol-based hand rubs containing emollients and other skin conditioners. Too few published data from comparative trials are available to reliably rank triclosan. Personnel should be reminded that it is neither necessary nor recommended to routinely wash hands after each application of an alcohol-based hand rub. Long-lasting improvement of compliance with hand hygiene protocols can be successful if an effective and accessible alcohol-based hand rub with a proven dermal tolerance and an excellent user acceptability is supplied, accompanied by education of health care workers and promotion of the use of the product.

Impact of Methicillin Resistance on Clinical Features and Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis Due to Staphylococcus aureus

BACKGROUND

This study sought to determine the impact of methicillin resistance on clinical features and outcomes in patients with Staphylococcus aureus (SA) infective endocarditis (IE).

METHODS

Retrospective chart review. Univariate and forward stepwise logistic regressions were conducted to determine which factors significantly affected death and systemic embolism.

RESULTS

From October 1995 to April 2002, 57 patients with a definite diagnosis of IE caused by SA were included: 28 cases of methicillin-sensitive SA infection and 29 methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) infection. Patients with MRSA infection are more likely to have old age, underlying diseases, history of hospitalization within the last 6 months, nosocomial infection, and antibiotic use within the last 3 months. Patients with MRSA infection had clinical presentation of less systemic embolism and more sepsis and had a higher 3-month mortality rate. Methicillin resistance is an independent positive predictor of death and a negative predictor of systemic embolism.

CONCLUSIONS

MRSA became a dominant cause of SA IE. Although it caused a lower incidence of systemic embolism, MRSA infection had a higher mortality rate because of sepsis.

Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and surgical-site infections

The current literature indicates that surgical-site infections significantly increase costs and length of stay. Nosocomial infections that are acquired after operative procedures increase mortality rates. Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of surgical-site infections among patients, particularly patients who undergo cardiothoracic surgery. Patients who carry S aureus in their nares are at increased risk for surgical-site infections that are caused by this organism. Occasionally, health care workers who carry S aureus in their nares can cause outbreaks of surgical-site infections or other nosocomial infections. Persons who carry S aureus in their nares and have upper respiratory tract infections may spread this organism to numerous staff members and patients. Key measures for decreasing rates of these and other nosocomial infections include the appropriate use of prophylactic antimicrobial agents, surveillance and reporting of infections, and surveillance for clusters of infection caused by the same strain of S aureus and culture and surveys, when appropriate, to help identify infected health care workers. Additionally, surgical masks may prevent health care workers from inadvertent transmission of S aureus from their nares to patients' surgical sites.

Poststernotomy mediastinitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endemic in a hospital

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for poststernotomy mediastinitis (PSM) due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in a hospital in which MRSA was endemic. A retrospective case-control study of patients with PSM after cardiac surgery during January 1997 through July 2002 was conducted. The incidence of PSM was 1.01% (48 of 4746 patients), and 31 episodes (64.6%) were due to MRSA infection. We analyzed the findings for 48 case and 65 control patients. Univariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for PSM were previous hospitalization, resternotomy, chronic renal insufficiency, longer operation time, postoperative heart failure, postoperative renal failure, and reoperation for bleeding. Multivariate analysis revealed that the independent risk factors for PSM were previous hospitalization and reoperation for bleeding. Previous hospitalization was the only significant risk factor for PSM due to MRSA infection. The hospital mortality rate associated with PSM was 41.7%, and there was a higher mortality rate associated with PSM due to MRSA infection.

Nosocomial infections in adult intensive-care units

Nosocomial infections affect about 30% of patients in intensive-care units and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Several risk factors have been identified, including the use of catheters and other invasive equipment, and certain groups of patients-eg, those with trauma or burns-are recognised as being more susceptible to nosocomial infection than others. Awareness of these factors and adherence to simple preventive measures, such as adequate hand hygiene, can limit the burden of disease. Management of nosocomial infection relies on adequate and appropriate antibiotic therapy, which should be selected after discussion with infectious-disease specialists and adapted as microbiological data become available.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the practice of otolaryngology--an emerging community acquired organism?

Soon after antibiotics were introduced to treat bacterial infections, resistance to these agents began to emerge. Staphylococcus aureus, a common organism in human infection, quickly became resistant to penicillin; however, semisynthetic penicillins seemed to have tremendous staying power. The recent emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) created a difficult problem in treating many hospital-acquired infections soon after it was discovered. However, now it appears to be spreading into the community at large. Although newer antibiotics have been developed to help manage this threat, multiple-drug resistance remains a fear among healthcare professionals. Eradication of MRSA appears to be an unachievable goal at this time, so attention has focused on decreasing the spread of this organism, often through simple hand-washing protocols. The continued spread of MRSA will have tremendous impact on the practice of medicine and otolaryngology during the next decade and beyond.