Treatment of posttransplantation recurrence of hepatitis C with interferon and ribavirin: lessons on tolerability and efficacy

Safe use of livers from deceased donors older than 70 years in recipients with HCV cirrhosis treated with direct-action antivirals. Retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

There is controversy regarding the use of older grafts for liver transplantation (LT) in HCV-infected patients, but the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) can radically change that debate.

METHODS

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate outcomes of the use of liver grafts from donors older than 70 years in recipients with HCV infection who underwent pre- or post-LT treatment with DAA. We compared two groups of patients who underwent LT using livers >70 years; the groups were defined according to antiviral therapy: non-DAA therapy group (n = 62; LT between May 1996 and December 2013), and DAA therapy group (n = 31; LT between January 2014 and December 2019).

RESULTS

Thirty (96.8%) patients of DAA therapy and nine (14.5%) of non-DAA therapy (21 patients underwent complete therapy with interferon-ribavirin) achieved sustained viral response (SVR). One, 3-, and 5-year patient survival were 83.9%, 67.7%, and 56.5% in the non-DAA group vs 93.5%, 88.4%, and 88.4% in the DAA group (P = 0.04); the 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival were 77.4%, 62.9%, and 51.6% in the non-DAA group vs. 88.6%, 83.7%, and 83.7% in the DAA group (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis demonstrated donor female sex and DAA therapy as protective factors of graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre- or post-LT therapy with DAA in HCV-infected patients has achieved an almost overall SVR. The use of liver grafts >70 years in these patients treated with DAA was associated with significantly higher 5-year patient and graft survival in DAA group compared to non-DAA group. Thus, the introduction of DAA therapy has allowed the safe use of livers >70 years in HCV-positive recipients.

Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir Without Ribavirin Achieved High Sustained Virologic Response for Hepatitis C Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: Two-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Current recommended regimens to treat patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation include the use of ribavirin (RBV). Limited data are available on the efficacy of RBV-free regimens posttransplant, particularly the use of sofosbuvir (SOF)/ledipasvir (LDV) without RBV in this patient population. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of SOF/LDV fixed-dose combination without RBV in patients with HCV recurrence posttransplant.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 46 patients with HCV recurrence posttransplant. SOF/LDV without RBV was used for 12 weeks in patients with early-stage fibrosis (F0-F2) or for 24 weeks in those with advanced fibrosis (F3-F4) and/or cholestatic hepatitis. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment. Secondary outcomes included relapse after treatment and adverse events.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients, with a mean age of 62 ± 8 years, a median duration since time of transplant of 904 days (range, 78-3525 days), an HCV genotype 1, and a mean baseline viral load of 7.79 million IU/mL, were treated. Of these, 32 patients were treated for 12 weeks, and 14 patients were treated for 24 weeks. Twenty-five patients (54%) were treatment experienced (21 with interferon and 4 with SOF). All 46 patients (100%) achieved sustained virological response (SVR) 12. Neither virologic relapses nor serious adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of SOF/LDV without RBV for 12 or 24 weeks produced 100% SVR 12 in patients with HCV recurrence after liver transplantation. The use of RBV may not be necessary to achieve SVR in this patient population.

Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Management of recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation still remains a challenge. Here, we report five patients who achieved viral responses following combined treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir. All the patients received tacrolimus for immunosuppression. No dose adjustment was made before the ledipasvir and sofosbuvir therapy. All completed the intended 12-week treatment course with the full dose of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir. There were no significant adverse events greater than grade 2. During the study period, no acute rejection episodes were detected. The trough levels of tacrolimus were maintained stably. Hepatitis C virus RNA was not detected at week 12 in any of the patients. Based on the findings from this pilot study, combined ledipasvir and sofosbuvir therapy for 12 weeks is effective and safe for living - donor liver transplantation recipients with recurrence of hepatitis C virus.

Spanish society of liver transplantation (SETH) consensus recommendations on hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation

In November 2010, the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation (Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, SETH) held a consensus conference. One of the topics of debate was liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis C. This document reviews (i) the natural history of post-transplant hepatitis C, (ii) factors associated with post-transplant prognosis in patients with hepatitis C, (iii) the role of immunosuppression in the evolution of recurrent hepatitis C and response to antiviral therapy, (iv) antiviral therapy, both before and after transplantation, (v) follow-up of patients with recurrent hepatitis C and (vi) the role of retransplantation.

Antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C reduces recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma following liver transplantation

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major concerns following liver transplantation (LT). With the potential antitumor properties of interferon (IFN), their role in prevention of HCC recurrence is to be defined. We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients who underwent LT for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related HCC between January 2004 and December 2008. Twenty-four (52.2%) patients with biopsy-proven HCV recurrence received antiviral therapy (IFN group); their outcomes were compared with 22 patients (control group). There was no significant difference for tumor size, number, and type of neo-adjuvant therapy between the two groups. The 1- and 3-year overall patient survival (100% vs. 90.9% and 87.3% vs. 71.8%; P = 0.150) and tumor-free survival (100% vs. 72.7% and 83.1% vs. 67.5%; P = 0.214) between IFN and control group were comparable. HCC recurrence was the most common cause of death (n = 6 of 12, 50%), all in the control group. During follow-up, seven (15.2%) patients developed HCC recurrence: one (4.1%) in the IFN group and six (27.3%) in the control group (P < 0.05). In conclusions, HCC recurrence rate and related deaths were significantly lower in patients that received post-transplant antiviral therapy for recurrent HCV.

An extended treatment protocol with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of an extended treatment protocol and to determine the predictors of sustained virological response (SVR) after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

Between August 2005 and November 2008, patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) after LT were selected for treatment if liver biopsy showed at least grade 2 inflammation and/or stage 2 fibrosis. All patients were to receive pegylated interferon (PEG)/regimens combining ribavirin (RBV) for an additional 48 wk after HCV undetectability.

RESULTS

Extended protocol treatment was initiated in thirty patients. Overall, 73% had end of treatment response and 60% had SVR. Nineteen patients completed treatment per protocol, of them, sixteen (84%) had end of treatment response, and fourteen (74%) achieved SVR. Both early virological response and 24-week virological response were individually associated with SVR but this association was not significant on multivariate analysis. Eleven patients (37%) discontinued therapy due to adverse effects. Cytopenias were the most common and most severe adverse effect, and required frquent growth factor use, dose adjustments and treatment cessations. The risk of rejection was not increased.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent HCV after LT can be safely treated with extended virological response-guided therpy using PEG/RBV, but requires close monitoring for treatment-related adverse effects, particularly cytopenias.

Management of hepatitis C virus infection recurrence after liver transplantation: an overview

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the major indication for liver transplantation worldwide. Its recurrence is virtually universal. Once reinfection is established, progression to cirrhosis occurs in 25%-30% of recipients within 5 years. Several studies have attempted to identify the ideal antiviral treatment for liver transplant recipients. At present, the management of recurrent HCV infection in liver transplant recipients is based on widely accepted indications, which represent a reliable guide to identify the "ideal" candidate for therapy, when therapy should be started, and what is to be expected in terms of side effects and response to treatment.

PHOENIX: A randomized controlled trial of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin as a prophylactic treatment after liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus

The efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the prophylactic treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (LT) with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin are not known. LT recipients with HCV were randomized to peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin treatment or observation 10 to 26 weeks post-LT. Prophylaxis patients received peginterferon alfa-2a (135 μg/week for 4 weeks and then 180 μg/week for 44 weeks) plus ribavirin (the initial dose of 400 mg/day was escalated to 1200 mg/day). Observation patients received the same regimen only upon significant HCV recurrence (histological activity index ≥ 3 and/or fibrosis score ≥ 2). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with histological evidence of significant HCV recurrence 120 weeks after randomization. In all, 115 patients were randomized (prophylaxis arm, n = 55; observation arm, n = 60). Sustained virological response was achieved by 12 of 54 prophylaxis patients (22.2%) and by 3 of 14 observation patients who switched to treatment (21.4%). On an intent-to-treat basis, significant HCV recurrence at 120 weeks was similar in the prophylaxis (61.8%) and observation arms (65.0%, P = 0.725). The patient and graft survival rates and the rates of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection were similar in the 2 study arms. Approximately 70% of the treated patients in both arms had at least one dose reduction for safety reasons. The most common adverse event leading to treatment withdrawal was anemia. Because of the safety profile of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin and the lack of a clear benefit in terms of HCV recurrence and patient or graft survival, this study does not support the routine use of prophylactic antiviral therapy.

Antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

A significant proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection develop liver cirrhosis and complications of end-stage liver disease over two to three decades and require liver transplantation, however, reinfection is common and leads to further adverse events under immunosuppression. Pretransplant antiviral or preemptive therapy is limited to mildly decompensated patients due to poor tolerance. The mainstay of management represents directed antiviral therapy after evidence of recurrence of chronic hepatitis C. Combined pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy is the current standard treatment with sustained viral response rates of 25% to 45%. The rate is lower than that in the immunocompetent population, partly due to the high prevalence of intolerability. To date, there is no general consensus regarding the antiviral treatment modality, timing, or dosing for HCV in patients with advanced liver disease and after liver transplantation. New anti-HCV drugs to delay disease progression or to enhance viral clearance are necessary.

Antiviral therapy increases the risk of bacterial infections in HCV-infected cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT) is universal and may cause premature graft loss. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of antiviral therapy in HCV-infected patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting LT.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients underwent treatment with peginterferon-alfa-2a and ribavirin. A control group of 51 untreated individuals awaiting LT were matched by age, Child-Pugh and MELD scores and time on the waiting list.

RESULTS

Case and control patients were comparable for all relevant variables. Fifteen treated patients (29%) had undetectable HCV-RNA at the time of transplantation and 10 (20%) achieved SVR. Early virological response and non-1 genotype were the strongest predictors of viral clearance. There was a higher incidence of bacterial infections in treated patients vs controls, particularly in Child-Pugh B-C individuals (17 vs 3 episodes) (log-rank=0.0016). Importantly, the incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in patients who were not receiving norfloxacin prophylaxis (n=83) was significantly higher in the treated group than in controls (log-rank=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that antiviral treatment prevents hepatitis C recurrence in 20% of HCV-infected patients. However, treatment should be recommended with caution in individuals with poor liver function who do not receive norfloxacin prophylaxis for SBP, since it increases the risk of bacterial infections.

Long-term antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation in nonresponders: biochemical, virological, and histological impact

More than 50% of patients with a recurrent posttransplant hepatitis C virus infection fail to respond to antiviral treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interest of a long-term antiviral treatment maintained for more than 48 weeks. Seventy treated patients, with a histological follow-up > 1 year, were enrolled in this observational, retrospective study. The duration of antiviral treatment, tolerance, and occurrence of virological, biochemical, and histological responses were recorded. Thirty-two patients were nonresponders after 48 weeks of treatment. Combined antiviral therapy was maintained for >12 months in 26 and for >18 months in 21. Twelve patients had to discontinue their treatment. At 48 weeks, the rates of virological response and sustained virological response were 37% and 24.3%, respectively; at the end of the follow-up, they were 48.5% and 35.7%. Virological response was significantly associated with a higher incidence of biochemical and histological response, regardless of its time of occurrence (before or after 6 months). Even in the absence of virological response, the rate of progression of fibrosis was significantly slowed in patients treated for more than 6 months. Our results show the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of long-term antiviral therapy in nonresponder patients with a recurrent posttransplant hepatitis C virus infection.

Antiviral maintenance treatment with interferon and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: pilot study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate efficacy of a long-term antiviral maintenance therapy (AMT) with interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation received AMT with interferon and ribavirin, following 12 months of a basic antiviral combination treatment. Allograft function, viremia loads and allograft morphology were evaluated continuously.

RESULTS

After 12 months of basic antiviral therapy, 14 patients (66.6%) had achieved initial clearance of viremia levels, and 17 recipients (81%) demonstrated normalization of allograft function, respectively. Inflammation score declined significantly (6.0 vs 3.9; P = 0.002), while stage of fibrosis remained unchanged. In virological responders maintenance therapy led to further regression of inflammation score (4.0 at baseline vs 3.1 at 24 months AMT) and fibrosis score (1.6 at baseline vs 1.1 at 24 months AMT). Despite persistence of viremia levels, continued antiviral therapy prevented progression to severe allograft inflammation in virological non-responders. Hematologic adverse effects resulted in treatment discontinuation in seven patients (33.3%).

CONCLUSION

Long-term AMT, if tolerable, might be an effective approach for preventing progression to severe allograft fibrosis and thereby improving long-term survival in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C.

Managing chronic hepatitis C in the difficult-to-treat patient

Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and disease-related complications - among them cirrhosis and liver failure - pose a particular management challenge. Some of these patients may fail to respond to current therapy (non-responders), and some are affected so severely that treatment puts them at an unacceptable risk for complications. Treatment with pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin improves hepatic enzyme levels and eradicates the virus in approximately 50% of patients; however, a significant number of patients do not respond to therapy or relapse following treatment discontinuation. Several viral, hepatic and patient-related factors influence response to IFN therapy; many of these factors cannot be modified to improve long-term outcomes. Identifying risk factors and measuring viral load early in the treatment can help to predict response to IFN therapy and determine the need to modify or discontinue treatment. Retreatment options for patients who have failed therapy are limited. Retreatment with peg-IFN has been successful in some patients who exhibit an inadequate response to conventional IFN treatment, particularly those who have relapsed. Consensus IFN, another option in treatment-resistant patients, has demonstrated efficacy in the retreatment of non-responders and relapsers. Although the optimal duration of retreatment and the benefits and safety of maintenance therapy have not been determined, an extended duration is likely needed. This article reviews the risk factors for HCV treatment resistance and discusses the assessment and management of difficult-to-treat patients.

Anemia in liver transplant recipients undergoing antiviral treatment for recurrent hepatitis C

Adherence to antiviral therapy is essential to achieve sustained virological responses in patients treated for hepatitis C. An important limitation to use of appropriate doses of ribavirin is development of anemia. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with anemia in liver transplant recipients undergoing treatment for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV). Retrospective analysis was performed on 115 adult liver transplantation (LT) recipients who received antiviral treatment. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin of <10 gm/dL or the use of erythropoietin replacement therapy. Variables found to be significant in univariate analysis were further studied in multivariate analysis. The mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) age of our cohort was 52.1 (+/- 8.8) yr. Anemia developed in 44 patients (38.3%). Mean (+/- SD) onset of anemia was 8.9 (+/- 6.8) weeks after initiation of antiviral therapy. A total of 30 patients (26%) required erythropoietin replacement, at a mean (+/- SD) of 7.9 (+/- 6.0) weeks after start of antiviral treatment. A total of 27 patients (24%) required ribavirin dose reduction, at a mean (+/- SD) time to dose reduction of 8.1 (+/- 6.3) weeks. In univariate analysis, body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.01), mycophenolate mofetil use (P = 0.05), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (P = 0.02), and age (P = 0.02) were statistically significant. In conclusion, in multivariate analysis, BMI (P < 0.01) and age (P = 0.02) were found to be independent predictors of anemia. Anemia is common in liver transplant recipients treated for recurrent HCV. Special vigilance is required for older patients and patients with a low BMI.

Management of hepatitis C virus in the transplant patient

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of chronic hepatitis, with 170 to 190 million people infected worldwide. The treatment of choice for patients who have HCV-related cirrhosis with or without hepatocellular carcinoma is liver transplantation. Virologic recurrence is constant after transplantation and results in chronic hepatitis in the vast majority. HCV infection now can be cured in a substantial proportion of liver transplant recipients. This review highlights the available strategies to improve outcome, including modification of factors that affect disease progression and the efficacy of antiviral therapy.

Hepatitis C virus re-infection: new perspectives

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) re-infection of the liver graft has been recognized to be one of the most important factors that determines prognosis and outcome after liver transplantation in HCV-positive patients. Graft loss due to recurrent HCV re-cirrhosis and subsequent hepatic decompensation, which is the predominant cause of death among transplant recipients, reflects the prognostic significance of HCV re-infection. Despite better overall outcome after liver transplantation, the prognosis of HCV-infected patients has not improved during the last two decades. Recent data suggest that increased liver donor age and intensified immunosuppression of transplant patients are the most important contributors to this situation. Other prognostic factors need further confirmation to stratify risk constellations. As HCV cirrhosis has also become the leading indication for orthotopic liver transplantation, the therapeutic management of HCV re-infection is a central issue of liver transplantation. The antiviral approaches based on interferon (IFN) alpha and ribavirin combinations are still hampered by high toxicity and low efficacy. Sustained viral response rates are still as low as approximately 10-30% and further prospective clinical trials are mandatory to identify the best time point and schedule of antiviral treatment in transplant patients.

Therapeutic management of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C ranges from minimal damage to cirrhosis developing in a few months or years in a substantial proportion of transplant recipients. Different virus, host and donor factors are involved in the pathogenesis of recurrence, but many are poorly understood. Therapeutic strategies can be utilized in the pre-, peri- or posttransplantation setting. Antiviral therapy using interferon and ribavirin and modifying immunosuppression are the main strategies to prevent progression disease. The efficacy of interferon and ribavirin is limited and side effects, reduction/withdrawal are frequent. Current sustained virological response rates are approximately 28%. An optimal immunosuppression regimen has not been established. The choice of calcineurin inhibitors has not clearly been shown to affect histological hepatitis C virus (HCV) but higher cumulative exposure to corticosteroids to treat acute rejection is associated with more severe recurrence. The manner in which the doses of immunosuppression are modified has more influence on HCV recurrence than the use of a specific drug per se. Debate about the influence of immunosuppressive regimens on HCV recurrence is ongoing. Potential antifibrotic therapy and new agents targeting HCV infection and replication are emerging and are anticipated to be added to our armentarium in battling recurrent HCV post-LT.

The kidney transplant recipient with hepatitis C infection: pre- and posttransplantation treatment

Liver disease secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients. Evaluation of patients with chronic HCV infection is warranted to determine stage of disease and the need for HCV therapy. Although combination therapy with interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin is the standard of care for chronic HCV infection, IFN monotherapy is recommended in dialysis patients because ribavirin is contraindicated in the presence of renal failure. The goals of pretransplantation HCV therapy are to decrease the risk for progression of HCV-associated liver disease, stabilize renal function in patients with HCV-related glomerulopathy, and prevent development of HCV-associated renal disease after transplantation. Posttransplantation HCV therapy is generally not recommended because of concerns regarding risk for precipitating acute rejection; however, antiviral therapy may be indicated to treat HCV-related glomerulopathy or prevent progression of chronic hepatitis C in patients with more advanced stages of fibrosis. When treatment is required, restored renal function allows use of combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin. Limitations of current HCV therapy include lack of tolerability and suboptimal response rates. New antiviral agents that can be used in dialysis patients (e.g., ribavirin alternatives) and in the posttransplantation setting (e.g., IFN alternatives) are needed to improve outcomes in these populations.

Sustained virological response to antiviral therapy reduces mortality in HCV reinfection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

HCV infection recurs almost in all HCV-positive patients receiving liver transplantation and carries a poor prognosis. Aim of this study was to analyze efficacy and effect on survival of antiviral therapy in this clinical setting.

METHODS

Pegylated-interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin were administered at a dose of 1 microg/kg of bwt weekly and 600-800 mg/day. Planned duration of treatment was 24 or 48 weeks according to HCV genotype. Patients who failed to respond at week 24 were considered as non-responders.

RESULTS

61 patients were enrolled. According to intention-to-treat analysis, 44 (72%) patients were considered as treatment failure (31 non-responders, 4 relapsers, 9 dropout). Sustained virological response was achieved in 17 cases (28%). Genotype 2, higher doses of antivirals and absence of histological cirrhosis were predictors of sustained virological response. In the follow up, patients with sustained virological response had a significantly lower mortality compared to patients with treatment failure (chi2=6.9; P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Response rate to antiviral therapy in HCV reinfection after liver transplantation is higher if a full dose of antiviral drugs is administered and if treatment starts before histological cirrhosis has developed. Sustained virological response improves patient survival.

Approach to recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Hepatitis C-associated liver failure is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Histologic evidence of recurrence is apparent in approximately 50% of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients in the first postoperative year. Approximately 10% of HCV-infected recipients will die or lose their allograft due to hepatitis C-associated allograft failure. HCV-infected recipients who undergo retransplantation have 5-year patient and graft survival rates that are broadly similar to those for transplant recipients who are not HCV infected. Although the choice of calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, or both has not been clearly shown to affect histologic recurrence of hepatitis C, higher cumulative exposure to corticosteroids is associated with increased mortality and more severe histologic recurrence. In contrast to treatment of non-HCV-infected recipients, treatment of HCV-infected transplant recipients for acute cellular rejection is associated with attenuated patient survival. Steroid-resistant rejection with or without the use of T-cell-depleting therapies is associated with a greater than fivefold increased risk of mortality in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. Pegylated interferon with or without ribavirin should be considered for treatment of recipients with histologically apparent recurrence of hepatitis C before total bilirubin exceeds 3 mg/dL. The role of hepatitis C immunoglobulin and new immunosuppressive agents in the management of hepatitis C after transplant continues to evolve.

Effect of nonviral factors on hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis C (HCV) is now the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). While graft reinfection remains universal, progression to graft cirrhosis is highly variable. This study examined donor, recipient, and operative variables to identify factors that affect recurrence of HCV post-OLT to facilitate graft-recipient matching.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 307 patients who underwent OLT for HCV over a 10-year period at our center. Recurrence of HCV was identified by the presence of biochemical graft dysfunction and concurrent liver biopsy showing diagnostic pathologic features. Time to recurrence was the endpoint for statistical analysis. Five donor, 6 recipient, and 2 operative variables that may affect recurrence were analyzed by univariate comparison and Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

Recurrence-free survival in the 307 study patients was 69% and 34% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Four predictive variables related to either donor or recipient characteristics were identified. Advanced donor age, prolonged donor hospitalization, increasing recipient age, and elevated recipient MELD scores were found to increase the relative risk of HCV recurrence. Examination of HLA disparity between donors and recipients demonstrated no correlation between class I or class II mismatches and recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified donor and recipient characteristics that significantly predict hepatitis C recurrence following liver transplantation. These factors are identifiable before transplant and, if considered when matching donors to HCV recipients, may decrease the incidence of HCV recurrence after OLT. A change in the current national liver allocation system would be needed to realize the full value of this benefit.

Antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in the setting of liver transplantation

Hepatitis C viremia after liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) liver disease is universal. Progressive HCV disease after transplantation is the leading cause of death, graft failure, and retransplantation. Whether to treat, with which agents, and timing of therapy are unanswered questions. Timing options include pretransplantation, prophylactic, post-transplantation preemptive, and post-transplantation recurrence-based therapy. The latter is most commonly utilized. There are little data for each of these, much less comparisons. Pegylated interferon-alpha has supplanted standard interferon-alpha due to increased efficacy and is generally used in combination with ribavirin (RBV). Efficacy is less than in nontransplant settings due to immunosuppression, an increased prevalence of genotype 1 HCV, patient comorbidities, and decreased functional status. Administration of HCV therapy to cirrhotic patients prior to transplantation may eradicate or suppress HCV and prevent or reduce severity of recurrence. Sustained virological response (SVR) as high as 50% was attained in genotypes 2 or 3 HCV. Comparison of preemptive and histology-based post-transplantation HCV therapy should be done, and more data will be available on pretransplantation therapy. Post-transplant patients are less tolerant of therapy, particularly RBV. SVR, the primary goal of therapy, likely halts disease progression, but only 20% to 30% of treated patients achieve SVR. Preemptive therapy early after transplantation may have advantages due to the potential to delay or blunt severity of graft infection and recurrent hepatitis. In post-transplant therapy, RBV toxicity is attenuated in relation to decreased renal function, and side effects of interferon are more prominent. An ongoing trial will assess preemptive therapy with treatment after histologic recurrence. Novel anti-HCV therapies such as protease and polymerase inhibitors are emerging. These must be tested with urgency in the transplant setting. Retransplantation for progressive HCV disease is more controversial due to poor outcomes, graft shortage, and disease recurrence.

Antiviral treatment withdrawal in viremic HCV-positive liver transplant patients: impact on viral loads, allograft function and morphology

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical long-term consequences of antiviral treatment discontinuation in viremic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

Twenty-five HCV-positive patients after liver transplantation were included in this study. After diagnosing recurrent hepatitis C, a combination therapy with interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin for a minimum of 12 months was initiated. Viremia levels and allograft function were monitored continuously. Allograft biopsies were performed yearly, analyzing grading of inflammation and staging of fibrosis.

RESULTS

HCV recurrence rate was 100%. Up to 114 months post-transplantation, sustained virological response rate was 64%. Treatment discontinuation in virological nonresponders led subsequently to a significant increase of viral loads and deterioration of allograft function (P<0.05) within 1 month. In three patients, a fibrosing cholestatic syndrome developed, resulting in one patient death. Antiviral retherapy was maintained for a mean of 33 months, leading to a significant decline of aminotransferases (P<0.05) as well as decreasing serum levels of bilirubin and HCV-RNA within 6 months. In addition, development of severe allograft fibrosis was prevented despite persistent viral loads.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that antiviral treatment withdrawal carries the risk of severe disease progression in persistently viremic HCV-positive liver transplant patients.

[Management of hepatitis C virus infection in liver transplantation]

Because of graft reinfection and recurrence of the primary disease in the graft, patients who undergo transplantation due to cirrhosis caused by chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have a poorer long-term prognosis than non-HCV-infected transplant recipients. Apart from antiviral therapy, which can occasionally eradicate HCV infection before transplantation, there are no effective measures to prevent graft reinfection. Pre-transplantation antiviral therapy, however, is of limited applicability with currently available drugs. After liver transplantation, 2 options can be used to prevent graft loss due to HCV progression: early treatment in the first 4-6 weeks when there is still no evidence of histological injury and treatment of established HCV infection. Early antiviral therapy is limited not only by its scarce applicability but also by poor tolerability and limited effectiveness (sustained virological response in approximately 20-30% of patients). Treatment of established HCV infection, especially in patients with evidence of disease progression in biopsy, is the most cost-effective alternative with an efficacy of around 35-45% when pegylated interferon combined with ribavirin is used. Adverse effects, such as cytopenia and even induction of rejection, are the main limitation and lead to premature withdrawal in 30% of patients.

Plasma ribavirin concentrations during treatment of recurrent hepatitis C with peginterferon alpha-2b and ribavirin combination after liver transplantation

After liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis, recurrence of HCV infection is universal. The efficacy of antiviral therapy in this indication is usually reduced because of its poor tolerability. We present herein the results of plasma measurement of ribavirin levels in transplanted patients when using increasing dosage of ribavirin, in comparison with a control cohort of nontransplanted patients. Seventeen control patients (nine women and eight men, median age 51.5 years) were compared with 12 liver transplant patients (2 women and 10 men, median age 55 years). In 76% of patients, HCV infection was genotype 1. All patients were treated by a combination of ribavirin and pegylated-interferon alpha-2b. A total of 54 blood samples were taken (1.8 per patient) for ribavirin level measurement. A virological response was obtained in 8/17 patients in the control group and in 6/12 LT patients. Ribavirin dose was lower in the LT group (8.79 vs 12.98 mg/kg/day), but plasma levels were the same in both groups (2.23 vs 2.43 mg/L for LT and non-LT groups, respectively). This was probably related to impaired renal function in the LT group (serum creatinine: 112.6 vs 73.6 micromol/L). No discontinuation of ribavirin therapy was observed and haemoglobin level was the same in both groups (109.5 g/L in LT patients vs 119.5 g/L in the control group). These results strongly support the interest in plasma measurement of ribavirin concentration during antiviral therapy in LT patients. Ribavirin dosage might be adapted without compromising its efficacy.

Interferon-based combination anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation: a review and quantitative analysis

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) is universal. However, the efficacy, tolerability and safety of combination interferon and ribavirin (IFN-RIB) or peginterferon and ribavirin (PEG-RIB) anti-viral therapies post-LT are uncertain. We performed a comprehensive search of major medical databases (1980-2005) and conference proceedings (1996-2005). The main outcome measure was sustained virological response (SVR, undetectable HCV RNA) at 6 months. Summary estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Twenty-seven IFN-RIB and 21 PEG-RIB studies were included. IFN-RIB was associated with a pooled SVR rate of 24% (95% CI, 20-27%), while PEG-RIB was associated with an SVR rate of 27% (23-31%). Pooled discontinuation rates were 24% (21-27%) with IFN-RIB and 26% (20-32%) with PEG-RIB. The pooled rate of acute graft rejection was 2% (1-3%) with IFN-RIB and 5% (3-7%) with PEG-RIB. IFN-RIB and PEG-RIB therapies in HCV infection post-LT were associated with similar but overall low SVR and were poorly tolerated. The rate of acute rejection was small. The therapeutic advantage of PEG-RIB therapy observed in non-transplant chronic HCV infection appears to be attenuated post-LT. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate reasons for this post-transplant therapeutic disadvantage and to find strategies to ameliorate them.

Management of hepatitis C in the setting of liver transplantation

Each year, 5000 to 6000 liver transplantations are performed in the United States, 40% of which are for hepatitis C-related end-stage liver disease. Infection of liver allograft is universal and is associated with an accelerated rate of disease progression. Unfortunately, antiviral therapy after transplantation is less effective and often is beset with complications. This article reviews antiviral therapies and the factors that may influence the response in patients who have HCV infection both immediately before and after liver transplantation.

Aspects of hepatitis C virus infection relating to liver transplantation

End-stage liver disease caused by the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major indication for liver transplantation. HCV re-infection after transplantation is almost constant, and recent data confirm that it significantly impairs patient and graft survival. Factors that may influence disease severity and consequent progression of HCV graft injury remain unclear. Chronic HCV infection develops in 75-90% of patients, and 5-30% ultimately progress to cirrhosis within 5 years. Pre-transplantation antiviral treatment is not easily related to poor tolerance. Attempts to administer prophylactic post-transplantation antiviral treatment are under evaluation but are limited by the side-effects of antiviral drugs. Treatment of established graft lesions with interferon or ribavirin as single agents has been disappointing. Combination therapy gave promising results, with sustained virological response in 25-35% of patients, but indications, modality and duration of treatment should be assessed.

[Viral hepatitides infections in transplant recipients]

Hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B (HBV) -related end-stage liver disease are the most common indications for liver transplantation (LTx) in our area. Recurrent HCV infection is universal after LTx and although histological recurrence is variable, the rate of disease progression is more rapid than in non-immunosuppressed patients and this impact graft and patient survival. All anti-HCV treatment strategies have shown limited efficacy so, at the present time, HCV reinfection after LTx represents the most important clinical problem in the follow-up. Regarding HBV, the most important factor in viral recurrence in the allograft is the presence of active viral replication at the time of LTx. The best patient selection (in non-replicative phase), the indefinite use of hyperimmune anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin and the use of the new antiviral drugs have made possible a significant improvement in graft and patient survival.

Management of Recurrent Hepatitis C in Liver Transplant Recipients

Recurrent HCV infection is universal in liver transplant recipients who are viremic pretransplant. The rate of histologic disease progression after transplantation is more rapid, and the risk of cirrhosis by 5 to 10 years is about 30%. Several donor, recipient, and viral factors have been associated with worse post-transplant outcomes in recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. Whether or not HCV-infected recipients of live donor grafts have worse out-comes compared with deceased donor graft recipients is controversial. To maximize the long-term survival of recipients with HCV infection, eradication of infection is the ultimate goal. Treatment of recurrent HCV after liver transplantation can be undertaken at several different time points: (1) prophylactically, at the time of transplantation; (2) pre-emptively, in the early post-transplant period; and (3) after established recurrent histologic disease is present. Prophylactic therapy for HCV infection has no established role at present, but studies are ongoing. Preemptive therapy using IFN and RBV has resulted in variable SVR rates (9%-43%) and is generally poorly tolerated, especially if the patient has advanced liver disease pretransplantation. Treatment of established recurrent HCV disease with combination PEGIFN and RBV is associated with a SVR in about 30% to 35% of patients overall but is limited by high rates of dose reduction or drug discontinuation. In conclusion, successful HCV eradication in the post-transplant setting is difficult with current treatment options, but it is possible. Determination of the optimal doses of antiviral drugs in transplant patients and improvements in drug tolerability may be important first steps in achieving enhanced response rates. There is a need for new drugs in this population that have greater efficacy and a better safety profile.

Management of hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease is the leading cause of graft loss in liver transplant recipients with pre-transplant HCV infection. While natural history is variable, median time to recurrent cirrhosis is less than a decade. Factors contributing to risk of recurrence and rate of fibrosis progression are only partially known. Older donor age, treatment of acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection and high pre-transplant viral load are most consistently linked with worse outcomes. Whether these factors can be modified to positively impact on HCV disease progression is unknown. The main therapeutic approach for patients with recurrent HCV disease has been the treatment with interferon and ribavirin (RBV) once recurrent disease is documented or progressive. Efficacy is lower than in nontransplant patients and tolerability, especially of RBV, is a major limitation. Stable or improved fibrosis scores are seen in the majority of sustained responders. Optimal dose, duration and timing of treatment have not been determined. Alternative strategies under study include pre-transplant treatment of decompensated cirrhotics, preemptive antiviral therapy started within weeks of transplantation and prophylactic therapy using HCV antibodies. Ongoing studies may establish a future role for alternative treatment approaches. Additionally, limited overall efficacy of interferon-based therapy in the transplant setting highlights the urgent need for new drug therapies.

Splenectomy and preemptive interferon therapy for hepatitis C patients after living-donor liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation is a major cause of graft failure. We routinely perform preemptive interferon and ribavirin therapy in patients after living-donor liver transplantation indicated for hepatitis C-related cirrhosis. One of the obstacles for the therapy includes blood cytopenia. To overcome this problem, we recently performed splenectomy concurrently with liver transplantation. Thirty-five patients underwent liver transplantation and received preemptive therapy for hepatitis C. They were divided into two groups: those with splenectomy (group A, n = 21) and those without (group B, n = 14). There was no significant difference in the frequency of morbidity between the groups. Platelet counts were well maintained in group A patients during the therapy, and cytopenia led to the discontinuation of the therapy in one group B patient. The results of the preliminary study warrant a randomized control trial to examine the feasibility of splenectomy and preemptive viral therapy during liver transplantation for hepatitis C.

Management of hepatitis C-infected liver transplant recipients at large North American centres: changes in recent years

Large (>or=45 transplants per year) North American liver transplant centres were surveyed regarding management of hepatitis C virus (HCV). A total of 25/41 (59%) and 28/48 (58%) of centres responded to the surveys in 1998 and 2003, respectively, with 17 centres participating in both surveys. HCV was the most common indication for transplantation. Use of protocol liver biopsies was higher in 2003 and 60% used them to monitor HCV disease. Fewer centres reported modifying primary immunosuppression (IMS) for HCV-positive (vs. non-HCV) patients in 2003 (26%) vs. 1998 (56%). IMS was most frequently tacrolimus-based, but mycophenolate mofetil use increased in 2003 (52% vs. 23% in 1998). In both years, approximately 40% treated allograft rejection differently in HCV-positive recipients, with less use of OKT3 in 2003. Combination anti-HCV therapy for 12 months or more was the treatment of choice and growth factor use was common (68%). HCV-positive recipients were considered candidates for retransplantation but HCV-specific criteria were used in decision-making. Practice of centres changed over time with an increase in HCV transplantation and use of protocol liver biopsies, and a trend towards lesser modification of IMS in HCV-positive recipients. We conclude that there is considerable variability in the management of HCV among transplant programs and over time.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus related liver disease

Liver transplantation is a useful treatment for end stage liver disease of all aetiologies but recurrent disease presents an ongoing challenge, particularly for hepatitis C virus (HCV) where recurrence is almost universal. Immunosuppression is needed for all patients after transplantation and should be tailored to the individual patient, with particular problems being noted for those with HCV. The longer term effects of immunosuppression, particularly renal failure and the adverse effects of certain treatments on the liver graft, have become more important as survival improves and results are studied for longer periods after transplantation.

Treatment of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

This article summarizes the current therapies, with particular emphasis on antiviral therapy. Because these alternatives have substantial limitations, pretransplant or early post-transplant recognition of patients with high risk of severe post-transplantation outcome is desirable to target these patients for intervention. Alternatively, the implementation of measures aimed at reducing or avoiding factors known to be associated with an aggressive recurrence is an additional strategy that needs to be explored.

Early hepatic stellate cell activation predicts severe hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

Only a subset of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients develop progressive hepatic fibrosis after liver transplantation (LT). Hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation is a pivotal step in hepatic fibrosis and precedes clinically apparent fibrosis. We determined whether early HSC activation, measured in 4-month protocol post-LT biopsies, is predictive of subsequent development of more histologically severe recurrence of HCV. Early (4 month) post-LT HSC activation, as measured by alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) staining, was determined in liver biopsies from recipients with severe (fibrosis score > or = 2, n = 13) and with mild (fibrosis score of 0, n = 13) recurrence of HCV at one-year post-LT. Immunohistochemical staining for alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) was used to generate HSC activation scores (regional and total). Total HSC activation scores at 4 months were similar in patients with severe and mild HCV recurrence (3.9 +/- 2.0 vs. 2.7 +/- 2.2, P = 0.2). Regional HSC activation, assessed as parenchymal (zones 1, 2, and 3) or mesenchymal (portal tracts and fibrous septa), was different between the study groups, with higher mesenchymal scores predictive of progression. No patients in the mild recurrence group had detectable mesenchymal alpha-SMA staining vs. 46% (6/13) of patients with severe recurrence (P < 0.01). Mesenchymal activation of HSC had a specificity and positive predictive value of 100% for development of progressive fibrosis in liver allografts of patients with hepatitis C. In conclusion, early activation of mesenchymal HSCs is a marker for progressive fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C post-LT and may help select patients who would benefit from HCV or HSC-targeted therapy.

Impact of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine on early recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on incidence, delay, severity and clinical course of early recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT). A total of 21 hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients after LT were prospectively enrolled in this study. All of them received a quadruple induction cyclosporine A (CsA)-based immunosuppression, augmented by MMF (n=12) or by azathioprine (n=9, AZA). MMF tended to delay recurrent disease (50+/-35 versus 35+/-35 weeks, P=0.5) with significantly lower levels of aminotransferases (P<0.05). Furthermore, patients under MMF revealed less severe allograft fibrosis at disease recurrence (stage of fibrosis: 1.5+/-0.5 versus 2.2+/-1.2; P=0.07). But stage of fibrosis significantly increased in the MMF-group (P<0.05) during 6 months of antiviral treatment. Three patients in the MMF-group and none of the controls suffered from severe fibrosing cholestatic recurrent hepatitis C. Initial post-LT administration of MMF tended to delay recurrent hepatitis C and to limit initial HCV-related biochemical and morphological graft dysfunction. But during clinical follow-up, its immunosuppressive capabilities exceeded possible antiviral properties, finally leading to significant progression of graft fibrosis. Thus, concomitant dose reduction of other basic immunosuppressants might be useful in this clinical setting.

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States and Europe, and more than 20,000 patients worldwide have undergone transplantation for complications of chronic hepatitis C. In North America, HCV accounts for 15% to 50% of the liver transplants performed in United States transplant programs. To maximize the long-term survival of liver transplant recipients who have HCV infection, eradication of infection is the ultimate goal. Pretransplant antiviral therapy with the goal of achieving viral eradication before transplantation is a consideration in some patients, especially those who have mildly decompensated liver disease. This article focuses on the management of liver transplant recipients who have HCV infection at the time of transplantation. Prophylactic and preemptive therapies, as well as treatment of established recurrent disease, are the strategies reviewed.

Topical testosterone treatment for chronic allograft failure in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplant recipients with allograft failure due to recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection often develop marked muscle wasting and ascites prior to death and are denied repeat liver transplantation. We sought to determine whether topical testosterone therapy is associated with improved muscle mass and survival in patients with chronic allograft failure post-liver transplant.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of liver transplant recipients with chronic allograft failure. Group 1 patients were treated for >6 months with testosterone gel 1%; group 2 patients were untreated.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were identified with stage 3 or 4 fibrosis, muscle wasting, and allograft failure due to recurrent HCV. Group 1 (n=9) patients had statistically significant improvement in albumin, testosterone, muscle strength, well-being, and MELD/CTP scores, while there was no improvement seen for any of these parameters in group 2 (n=5). There were no deaths in group 1, while four of five patients in group 2 died on average 84 days posttransplant. Adverse effects of testosterone treatment included lower extremity edema (which resolved upon dose adjustment), hypertension, and pruritus.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical testosterone gel appears to increase muscle strength, stimulate albumin synthesis, and improve survival in patients with allograft failure post-liver transplant.

Combined treatment with pegylated interferon (alpha-2b) and ribavirin in the acute phase of hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The efficacy and safety of treatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2b (Peg-Intron, 1.5 microg/kg) and ribavirin (400-800 mg) in the acute phase of recurrent HCV after LT is presented.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (17 men) transplanted for HCV-associated cirrhosis (genotype 1b) were treated for at least 6 months and compared with 24 consecutive transplant patients (16 men) without antiviral therapy (controls).

RESULTS

At completion of treatment, 14/24 treated patients (58%) achieved HCV-RNA negativity, compared to none of controls (P<0.0001). Sustained virological response (SVR) occurred in 8/23 treated patients (34.7%) who reached week 24 after treatment and none of controls (P<0.005). At 12 weeks after treatment, 15/24 patients (62.5%) had an early virological response (EVR) (seven tested HCV-RNA negative). SVR was associated with absence of corticosteroid bolus administration (P=0.01), presence of EVR (P=0.002) and absence of cytomegalovirus infection (P=0.001). Haematological adverse effects included anaemia, 17/24 cases (71%) and leukopenia, 23/24 cases (96%). One patient presented mild acute rejection that resolved by adjusting immunosuppressive dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in the acute phase of HCV reinfection yielded an EVR of 62.5% and a SVR of 34.7%. The combination was safe, with a low rate of therapy withdrawal.

Management of hepatitis C virus infection in the setting of liver transplantation

1. Posttransplantation recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection is a universal phenomenon with a highly variable natural history. 2. Approximately 10% to 25% of hepatitis C virus- infected recipients of liver allografts will develop cirrhosis within 5 years' after transplantation. 3. The 1-year actuarial risk of hepatic decompensation after recurrence of cirrhosis approximates 42%. 4. Some of the factors associated with aggressive recurrence include donor and recipient age, recent year of transplantation, recipient gender and race, the use of antithymocyte globulin, and high dose of corticosteroids. 5. Highly aggressive recurrent hepatitis C virus infection leading to cirrhosis fares poorly after retransplantation in the presence of hyperbilirubinemia and renal failure, with a 1-year survival of approximately 40%. 6. Elevated serum aminotransferases are a poor indicator or recurrent disease. 7. Current sustained virological response after combination pegylated alpha interferon and ribavirin treatment is approximately 25%. 8. There is no consensus on initiation time point, duration of treatment, or dosage. Given immunosuppression, at least 48 weeks of therapy is a reasonable approach. 9. Treatment for 48 weeks is cost effective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for men aged 55 years is $29,100 per life-year saved.