Are doctors still failing to assess and treat asthma attacks? An audit of the management of acute attacks in a health district

Identifying barriers and facilitators to ambulance service assessment and treatment of acute asthma: a focus group study

Background

Acute asthma is a common reason for patients to seek care from ambulance services. Although better care of acute asthma can prevent avoidable morbidity and deaths, there has been little research into ambulance clinicians’ adherence to national guidelines for asthma assessment and management and how this might be improved. Our research aim was to explore paramedics’ attitudes, perceptions and beliefs about prehospital management of asthma, to identify barriers and facilitators to guideline adherence.

Methods

We conducted three focus group interviews of paramedics in a regional UK ambulance trust. We used framework analysis supported by NVivo 8 to code and analyse the data.

Results

Seventeen participants, including paramedics, advanced paramedics or paramedic operational managers at three geographical sites, contributed to the interviews. Analysis led to five themes: (1) guidelines should be made more relevant to ambulance service care; (2) there were barriers to assessment; (3) the approach needed to address conflicts between clinicians’ and patients’ expectations; (4) the complexity of ambulance service processes and equipment needed to be taken into account; (5) and finally there were opportunities for improved prehospital education, information, communication, support and care pathways for asthma.

Conclusions

This qualitative study provides insight into paramedics’ perceptions of the assessment and management of asthma, including why paramedics may not always follow guidelines for assessment or management of asthma. These findings provide opportunities to strengthen clinical support, patient communication, information transfer between professionals and pathways for prehospital care of patients with asthma.

Characterization of asthma exacerbations in primary care using cluster analysis

RATIONALE

Patients with a history of asthma exacerbations are at a higher risk for future episodes of severe asthma exacerbations. Characterization of asthma phenotypes could help improve asthma management, including reducing exacerbations.

AIM

The aim of this study is to identify distinctive patient characteristics associated with a history of asthma exacerbations using cluster analysis.

METHODS

We used data assessing asthma control from two cross-sectional surveys of adult and pediatric patients in the primary care setting. A supervised cluster analysis with recursive partitioning approach was applied to identify characteristics that maximized the differences across subgroups.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 2205 adults and 2435 children and adolescents with asthma. Key predictors were identified in seven adult clusters including visiting an asthma specialist, number of hours worked, and excessive use of rescue medication. The rate ratio (RR) for having an exacerbation was significantly higher (2.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.46-3.36) in Cluster 7, with more female patients reporting severe disease, high body mass index, sinus infections, gastroesophageal reflux disease, skin allergies, and lower asthma control score. Features identified in the six pediatric clusters included visiting an asthma specialist, missed school days, race/ethnicity, and age. The RR for having an exacerbation was higher in Cluster 6 (2.36; 95% CI, 2.11-2.64), with patients reporting more severe disease, sinus and skin allergies, and lower asthma control score.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of specific risk factors can be enhanced by using supervised cluster analysis. This approach allows grouping of patients with unique characteristics to help identify patients at higher risk of exacerbations.

Comparison between the drug treatment used in children up to five years of age treated in an emergency room and the guidelines established in the III Brazilian Consensus on Asthma Management

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the management of asthma attacks in children up to five years of age treated in the pediatric emergency room of a hospital in the metropolitan area of the city of Recife, Brazil, as well as to determine whether the way in which asthma attacks are managed can influence the duration of emergency room visits for such children.

METHODS

A descriptive, exploratory study employing a quantitative, cross-sectional approach. The study sample comprised 246 children treated for asthma attacks in an emergency room. The approach used was evaluated in comparison with the approach recommended in the III Brazilian Consensus on Asthma Management, as was the length of time each child spent in the emergency room.

RESULTS

In 69 (28.1%) of the cases, the medications were used in accordance with the Consensus guidelines. In 34 (13.8%) of the cases, the doses used were those recommended in the Consensus guidelines, and the guidelines regarding nebulization procedures were followed in 33 cases (13.4%). No correlation was found between the approach taken and the length of the emergency room visit. In the logistic regression analysis, we observed that the adjusted risk of being released from the emergency room sooner than recommended in the Consensus guidelines (a length of time sufficient to allow the response to the treatment to be analyzed) was four times and fifteen times greater, respectively, for children with mild persistent asthma and for those with intermittent asthma.

CONCLUSION

Although there are obstacles to using the asthma management approach recommended in the Consensus guidelines (such obstacles including the lack of familiarity with the guidelines on the part of the multidisciplinary team, as well as the lack of recommended material and therapeutic resources), the duration of emergency room visits was found to be related to the degree of asthma severity.

Effect of clinical pathways on the management of acute asthma in the emergency department: five years of evaluation

There is a wide variability in clinical practice for treating acute asthma (AA) in the emergency department (ED), interfering in the quality of care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a clinical pathway on the management of AA in the ED. We conducted a prospective before-after study of patients presenting with AA to the adult ED, during five separate periods (from January to March): in 2001 (pre-protocol group), 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005 (6 months without educational reinforcement). We evaluated the effects of the recommendations on objective assessment of severity, diagnostic resource utilization, use of recommended and non-recommended therapy, and outcomes. The 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005 groups comprised, respectively: 108, 96, 97, 98, and 101 patients. There was a significant increase in the use of pulse oximetry (8.3%, 77.1%, 88.7%, 95.9%, and 97.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). There was an increase in the use of peak expiratory flow rate from 2001 to 2004 (4.6%, 20.8%, 28.9%, and 48.0%) and a decrease after a period without educational efforts (29.7%, p < 0.001). Although the overall use of systemic corticosteroids was not changed, there was a significant increase in the use of oral steroids (p < 0.001). There was a decrease in aminophylline utilization (p = 0.005). Length of stay in the ED was significantly reduced (p = 0.04). There was no effect on hospital admission or emergency discharge (p = 0.193). The AA clinical pathway applied in the ED was associated with a positive effect on improving the quality of care.

Asthma exacerbations. 5: assessment and management of severe asthma in adults in hospital

It is difficult to understand why there is such a huge discrepancy between the management of severe asthma recommended by evidence-based guidelines and that observed in clinical practice. The recommendations are relatively straightforward and have been widely promoted both in guidelines and reviews. Specialist physicians need to be more proactive in their implementation of such guidelines through the use of locally derived protocols and assessment sheets, reinforced by audit. The common occurrence of severe asthma and its considerable burden to the community would support such an approach.

Practice development plans to improve the primary care management of acute asthma: randomised controlled trial

Background

Our professional development plan aimed to improve the primary care management of acute asthma, which is known to be suboptimal.

Methods

We invited 59 general practices in Grampian, Scotland to participate. Consenting practices were randomised to early and delayed intervention groups. Practices undertook audits of their management of all acute attacks (excluding children under 5 years) occurring in the 3 months preceding baseline, 6-months and 12-months study time-points. The educational programme [including feedback of audit results, attendance at a multidisciplinary interactive workshop, and formulation of development plan by practice teams] was delivered to the early group at baseline and to the delayed group at 6 months. Primary outcome measure was recording of peak flow compared to best/predicted at 6 months. Analyses are presented both with, and without adjustment for clustering.

Results

23 consenting practices were randomised: 11 to early intervention. Baseline practice demography was similar. Six early intervention practices withdraw before completing the baseline audit. There was no significant improvement in our primary outcome measure (the proportion with peak flow compared to best/predicted) at either the 6 or 12 month time points after adjustment for baseline and practice effects. However, the between group difference in the adjusted combined assessment score, whilst non-significant at 6 months (Early: 2.48 (SE 0.43) vs. Delayed 2.26 (SE 0.33) p = 0.69) reached significance at 12 m (Early:3.60 (SE 0.35) vs. Delayed 2.30 (SE 0.28) p = 0.02).

Conclusion

We demonstrated no significant benefit at the a priori 6-month assessment point, though improvement in the objective assessment of attacks was shown after 12 months. Our practice development programme, incorporating audit, feedback and a workshop, successfully engaged the healthcare team of participating practices, though future randomised trials of educational interventions need to recognise that effecting change in primary care practices takes time. Monitoring of the assessment of acute attacks proved to be a feasible and responsive indicator of quality care.

Hearing half the message? A re-audit of the care of patients with acute asthma by emergency ambulance crews in London

PROBLEM

An initial audit of the care provided to emergency asthma patients by the ambulance service was carried out in 1996. Some under-recognition and under-treatment of severe asthma was found as well as a lack of documentation of patient condition on scene. A re-audit was undertaken in 1999.

DESIGN

A multidisciplinary advisory group was reconvened. The same method was adopted as for the first audit. Patients included were those administered nebulised salbutamol by crews in the catchment areas of four hospitals and those diagnosed with asthma at the Accident & Emergency (A&E) departments of those hospitals between January and March 1999.

SETTING

London Ambulance Service.

KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT

(1) Accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of treatment, and (2) adherence to protocol.

STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE

Following the first audit, treatment protocols were widened and brought into line with the British Thoracic Society guidelines for care of acute asthma patients. The results were widely disseminated within the service and training was initiated for all operational staff.

EFFECTS OF CHANGE

The number of patients included in the re-audit more than doubled (audit 1: n = 252, audit 2: n = 532). The increase occurred exclusively in those administered nebulised salbutamol by ambulance crews but diagnosed with conditions other than asthma in A&E (audit 1: n = 15, audit 2: n = 161). The proportion of patients diagnosed with asthma in A&E who were administered nebulised salbutamol by their attending crew rose from 58% to 75%. However, 43 asthma patients were not treated; several of these were not recognised as suffering from asthma and others fell within the changed protocols for treatment. Adherence to protocol for administration of salbutamol remained high. Pre-hospital documentation of key observations did not improve.

LESSONS LEARNT

Messages from the first audit seem to have been acted upon selectively. Implementing change is complex, and re-audit is necessary to understand the effects of the changes made.

Do the residents in the emergency department appropriately manage patients with acute asthma attack? A study of self-criticism

The objective of this study was to investigate the management of patients with asthma attack admitted to the emergency department (ED) in terms of compliance with international guidelines. The records of patients with asthma who were admitted to a university-based ED between December 2001 and December 2002 were evaluated. A total of 72 cases with available data were evaluated retrospectively. Twenty-six patients (36.1%) were admitted more than once during the study period. The number of multiple admissions ranged from 2 (15 patients, 20.0%) to 11 (2 patients, 2.8%). Peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements were recorded in 17 patients (23.6%) on presentation. Pulse and respiratory rates were recorded in 70 (97.0%) and 67 patients (93.0%), respectively. Thirty-four patients (47.2%) underwent chest x-ray; results were normal in most patients. Salbutamol was the most commonly used drug as first-line therapy. Ipratropium bromide (inhaled) and systemic corticosteroids were added to the salbutamol in 47 (65.2%), 42 (58.4%), and 32 patients (44%), respectively. Pulmonologists were consulted in only 7 cases (9.7%). Thirty patients (43.4%) were prescribed corticosteroids on discharge. The role of functional parameters in determining asthma severity and monitoring treatment effects should be emphasized in clinical practice. Finally, more prevalent use of management guidelines will help determine their usefulness.

Psychosocial factors in medical and psychological treatment avoidance: the role of the doctor-patient relationship

A community sample of 1106 adults was examined to assess the impact of the doctor-patient relationship on participants' avoidance of treatment for a recognized medical or psychological problem. Of five aspects of participants' previous experience with their physicians, all but waiting time predicted participants' self-reported treatment avoidance. In two logistic regression models participants who felt their physicians listened more to their concerns were less likely to avoid treatment for both medical and psychological problems during the previous 12 months. These findings suggest that patients' perceptions of how they are treated by physicians may help explain why many people delay or avoid healthcare treatment, even when faced with a significant health problem.

Efeito da implantação de um protocolo assistencial de asma aguda no serviço de emergência de um hospital universitário

INTRODUÇÃO: Existe grande variabilidade de prática clínica no tratamento da asma aguda na sala de emergência, o que interfere na qualidade de atendimento. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o efeito da implantação de um protocolo assistencial de asma aguda no Serviço de Emergência do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. MÉTODO: Estudo transversal, antes e após a implantação do protocolo assistencial de asma aguda no setor de adultos (idade > 12 anos) do referido serviço, avaliando o efeito das recomendações sobre a avaliação objetiva da gravidade, solicitações de exames, uso de terapêutica recomendada, uso de terapêutica não-recomendada e desfechos da crise. RESULTADOS: Na fase pré-implantação, foram estudados 108 pacientes e, na fase pós-implantação, 96 pacientes. Houve aumento na utilização da oximetria de pulso (de 8% para 77%, p < 0,001) e do pico de fluxo expiratório (de 5% para 21%, p < 0,001). Ocorreu aumento na utilização de recursos radiológicos (de 33% para 66%, p < 0,001) e de hemograma (de 11% para 25%, p = 0,016). Houve aumento no número de pacientes que receberam as três nebulizações preconizadas para a primeira hora de tratamento (de 22% para 36%, p=0,04). Embora a utilização geral de corticóide não se tenha modificado, houve aumento no uso de corticóide oral (de 8,3% para 28%, p < 0,001). Não houve alteração significativa na utilização de medidas terapêuticas não-preconizadas, no tempo de permanência na sala de emergência, nem nas taxas de internações e de altas. CONCLUSÃO: A aplicação do protocolo assistencial de asma aguda na sala de emergência obteve efeito positivo, com maior utilização de medidas objetivas na avaliação da gravidade e de medidas terapêuticas recomendadas, porém não teve repercussão sobre tratamento e desfechos.

Acute asthma in adults: a review

All patients with asthma are at risk of having exacerbations. Hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits account for a large proportion of the health-care cost burden of asthma, and avoidance or proper management of acute asthma (AA) episodes represent an area with the potential for large reductions in health-care costs. The severity of exacerbations may range from mild to life threatening, and mortality is most often associated with failure to appreciate the severity of the exacerbation, resulting in inadequate emergency treatment and delay in referring to hospital. This review describes the epidemiology, costs, pathophysiology, mortality, and management of adult AA in the ED and in the ICU.

The impact of exacerbations on the asthmatic patient's preference scores

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of exacerbations on mild to moderate asthmatic patients' preference-based, health-related, quality of life scores and also to describe the effect of these exacerbations on daily life. In a survey, 100 mild to moderate asthmatic patients in the United Kingdom were asked to rate three different health marker states on a scale between 0 (death) and 100 (perfect health), defined as: your asthma of today, a mild exacerbation, and a severe exacerbation of asthma. They were also asked to describe their symptoms and what they did when experiencing an exacerbation. During exacerbations the vast majority of asthmatic patients have significant symptoms and consume a considerable amount of health care resources, which often overlap. The health marker state "your asthma of today" was given a mean score of 81.0, a mild exacerbation a score of 62.1, and a severe exacerbation a score of 25.6, indicating a large impact on patients' daily life and their health-related quality of life. In conclusion, asthmatic patients are severely affected in their health and daily living by mild and severe exacerbations. Considerable effort should be made to reduce the number and severity of exacerbations.

Accident and emergency departments are still failing to assess asthma severity

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the documentation of vital signs in children attending accident and emergency (A&E) for asthma and to assess whether indicators of severity were used appropriately.

METHODS

Records of all children aged 3 to 14 attending A&E for the treatment of asthma in four London hospitals over a three month period were examined for documentation of heart rate, respiratory rate, peak expiratory flow rate, oxygen saturation, and fraction of inspired oxygen. The relation between severity indicators and whether the child was admitted or not was examined.

RESULTS

There were 255 attendances in 229 children. Heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded on most attendances (94.5%, 85.5%, and 96.8%) but fraction of inspired oxygen and peak flow were recorded in few children (48.6% and 48.5%). Heart rate and respiratory rate were higher and oxygen saturation lower in children who were admitted compared with those who were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of airways obstruction is inadequate in children but when measured may be used appropriately to guide admission. There is a need for interventions to improve assessment of children attending A&E for asthma.