A placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over trial of adjunctive one month remacemide hydrochloride treatment in patients with refractory epilepsy

Risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy in patients given adjunctive antiepileptic treatment for refractory seizures: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) represents the main cause of death in patients with refractory epilepsy. No evidence-based intervention to prevent SUDEP exists. We postulated that pooling data from randomised placebo-controlled trials in patients with refractory epilepsy might show a lower incidence of SUDEP in patients receiving antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) at efficacious doses than in those receiving placebo.

METHODS

We searched Medline and the Cochrane Library for randomised trials investigating any AED in the add-on treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in adults. We extracted the number and causes of death in patients allocated to AEDs at doses that were more efficacious than placebo against seizures, AEDs at non-efficacious doses, and placebo. In our primary analysis, we compared the occurrence of definite or probable SUDEP between patients given efficacious AED doses and those given placebo using the Mantel-Haenszel method, with exclusion of trials with no event.

FINDINGS

Data of 33 deaths, including 20 deemed as SUDEP, were extracted from 112 eligible randomised trials. 18 deaths were classified as definite or probable SUDEP and two as possible SUDEP. Definite or probable SUDEP, all SUDEP, and all causes of death were significantly less frequent in the efficacious AED group than in the placebo group, with odds ratios of 0·17 (95% CI 0·05-0·57, p=0·0046), 0·17 (0·05-0·57, p=0·0046), and 0·37 (0·17-0·81, p=0·0131), respectively. Rates of definite or probable SUDEP per 1000 person-years were 0·9 (95% CI 0·2-2·7) in patients who received efficacious AED doses and 6·9 (3·8-11·6) in those allocated to placebo.

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with adjunctive AEDs at efficacious doses may have reduced the incidence of definite or probable SUDEP by more than seven times compared with placebo in patients with previously uncontrolled seizures. This result provides evidence in favour of active treatment revision for patients with refractory epilepsy.

FUNDING

None.

The cognitive and psychomotor effects of remacemide and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy

An international trial comparing remacemide hydrochloride with carbamazepine was undertaken in individuals with newly diagnosed epilepsy using a novel double-blind, parallel-group, double triangular sequential design. Patients with two or more partial or generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the previous year were randomized to remacemide or carbamazepine and titrated to a target dose of 600 mg/day. Subsequent dosage adjustments were allowed while maintaining the blind. Repeated assessments of neuropsychological function and mood were carried out using computerized and conventional measures. The trial was completed 20 months after initiation, following the second interim analysis. Efficacy as measured by seizure recurrence showed remacemide to be inferior to carbamazepine. Baseline cognitive and neuropsychological measures showed impairment across the whole patient population. Cognitive/neuropsychological performance at 8, 24, and 48 weeks was compared with that at baseline. Significant deterioration was seen on measures of information processing speed and attention after treatment with carbamazepine. The study data provide evidence for the utility and sensitivity of a number of cognitive assessments, which may be employed in future trials of antiepileptic drugs.

Isobolographic analysis of interactions between remacemide and conventional antiepileptic drugs in the mouse model of maximal electroshock

Using the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure model, indicative of tonic-clonic seizures in humans, the present study was aimed at characterizing the interaction between remacemide and valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital. Isobolographic analysis indicated additive interactions between remacemide and valproate, carbamazepine, and phenytoin (for all fixed ratios of tested drugs: 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1). Additivity was also observed between remacemide and phenobarbital applied in proportions of 1:1 and 3:1. In contrast, the combination of remacemide and phenobarbital at the fixed-ratio of 1:3 resulted in antagonism. Neither motor performance nor long-term memory was impaired by remacemide or by carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and valproate whether or not these drugs were administered singly or in combination. In combination with remacemide, brain concentrations of carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin were increased by 71, 21, and 16%, respectively. Although brain valproate concentrations were unaffected by remacemide co-administration, brain concentrations of remacemide and its active metabolite, desglycinyl-remacemide, were increased by 68 and 162%, respectively. In contrast, phenobarbital co-administration was associated with decreases in brain remacemide (27%) and desglycinyl-remacemide (9%) concentrations, whereas only remacemide concentrations (increased by 131%) were affected by carbamazepine co-administration. In conclusion, significant and desirable pharmacodynamic interactions were observed between remacemide and valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital. However, the concurrent pharmacokinetic interactions associated with remacemide complicate these observations and do not make remacemide a good candidate for adjunctive treatment of epilepsy.

In Situ-Produced 7-Chlorokynurenate Has Different Effects on Evoked Responses in Rats with Limbic Epilepsy in Comparison to Naive Controls

PURPOSE

Uncontrolled epilepsy remains a significant health concern and requires new approaches to therapy. N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blockade has been considered, but the adverse cognitive and behavioral effects of conventional NMDA-receptor antagonists have prevented the development of clinically useful compounds. An alternative approach may be the blockade of the glycine coagonist ("glycine(B)") site of the NMDA receptor.

METHODS

As a first step in the exploration of this approach, we examined the effect of 4-chloro-kynurenine (4-Cl-KYN), which is converted by astrocytes to the potent NMDA glycine-site antagonist 7-chloro-kynurenic acid (7-Cl-KYNA), on the in vivo epileptiform evoked potentials in the CA1 region of rats with chronic limbic epilepsy (CLE). 4-Cl-KYN (100 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally to naive and epileptic rats. Evoked potentials were induced in area CA1 of the hippocampus by electrical stimulation of the midline region of the thalamus. Simultaneous microdialysis was performed in the contralateral hippocampus to determine the extracellular levels of 7-Cl-KYNA over the course of the experiment.

RESULTS

Administration of 4-Cl-KYN caused a significant reduction in the amplitude of the population spike and in the number of population spikes in epileptic animals (p < 0.01) but had no effect on the evoked response in naive rats. In contrast, 4-Cl-KYN significantly altered the paired response in naive animals (p < 0.01), but had no significant effect on this parameter in epileptic animals. The levels of 7-Cl-KYNA measured achieved known pharmacologically effective concentrations and paralleled the observed physiological effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of glial cells for the neosynthesis and local delivery of neuroactive compounds may be a viable strategy for the treatment of limbic epilepsy. These results also underscore the unique pharmacology of neurons in epilepsy.

Glutamate receptors and Parkinson's disease: opportunities for intervention

Parkinson's disease is a debilitating neurodegenerative movement disorder that is the result of a degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. The resulting loss of striatal dopaminergic tone is believed to underlie a series of changes in the circuitry of the basal ganglia that ultimately lead to severe motor disturbances due to excessive basal ganglia outflow. Glutamate plays a central role in the disruption of normal basal ganglia function, and it has been hypothesised that agents acting to restore normal glutamatergic function may provide therapeutic interventions that bypass the severe motor side effects associated with current dopamine replacement strategies. Analysis of the effects of glutamate receptor ligands in the basal ganglia circuit suggests that both ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors could have antiparkinsonian actions. In particular, NMDA receptor antagonists that selectively target the NR2B subunit and antagonists of the metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR5 appear to hold promise and deserve future attention.

Influence of cytochrome P450 induction on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remacemide hydrochloride

Remacemide hydrochloride (RMD) is a putative anticonvulsant agent with an active metabolite, desglycinyl-remacemide (DGR) and a broad spectrum of activity in experimental seizure models. In clinical trials, however, the efficacy of RMD is questionable. In the case of add-on studies, the inconclusive findings may be related to pharmacokinetic interactions between RMD and established antiepileptic drugs. We have investigated the influence of cytochrome P450 (CYP(450)) induction following repeated treatment with phenobarbital (PB) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of RMD in mice. Pre-treatment with PB (80 mg/kg; once daily for 4 days) significantly increased CYP(450) content and activity in mouse liver. This was associated with a consistent reduction in the brain concentrations of both RMD and DGR and attenuation of the anticonvulsant effects of RMD in the maximal electroshock model. Pharmacokinetic analysis suggested that DGR was proportionately more susceptible to CYP(450) induction than the parent compound. As the principal active moiety, the selectively enhanced metabolism of DGR under induced conditions may underlie the debatable findings of add-on trials with RMD in refractory epilepsy. However, this hypothesis does not explain the similarly questionable efficacy of RMD monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy, an observation that may have wider pharmacological implications.

Efficacy and Safety of Remacemide versus Carbamazepine in Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy: Comparison by Sequential Analysis

An international trial comparing remacemide hydrochloride with carbamazepine was undertaken in newly diagnosed epilepsy using a novel double-blind, parallel group, double triangular sequential design. Patients with two or more partial or generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the previous year were randomized to 600 mg daily of remacemide or carbamazepine. Subsequent dosage adjustments were allowed while maintaining the blind. The trial completed 20 months after initiation following the second interim analysis. Efficacy data on 449 patients showed carbamazepine to be significantly more effective than remacemide in preventing seizure recurrence (P = 0.003). Median time to first seizure after titration, the primary endpoint, was 112 days for remacemide and 306 days with carbamazepine. Time to second, third, and fourth seizures after randomization all significantly favored carbamazepine. Remacemide was shown unequivocally to be inferior to carbamazepine in this patient population. This study also establishes carbamazepine as a proven treatment for use in subsequent active control comparative trials.

Remacemide for drug-resistant localization related epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a common neurological condition, affecting 0.5 to 1% of the population. Nearly 30 per cent of people with epilepsy have seizures that are refractory to currently available drugs. In response to this problem, potential new drugs are being developed. Remacemide is one of these.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of add-on treatment with remacemide upon seizures, adverse effects, cognition and quality of life for people with drug-resistant localization related epilepsy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group trials register (4 July 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2002) and MEDLINE (28 May 2002). In addition, we contacted AstraZeneca (makers of remacemide) and colleagues in the field to see if they were aware of any trials that we had missed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized placebo controlled add-on trials of people of any age with localization related seizures, in which an adequate method of concealment of randomization was used. The studies could be blinded or unblinded and be of parallel or crossover design. They had to have a minimum treatment period of eight weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion. Outcomes investigated included 50 per cent or greater reduction in seizure frequency, treatment withdrawal, adverse effects, effects on cognition and quality of life. The primary analyses were by intention-to-treat. Dose response was evaluated in regression models.

MAIN RESULTS

Two parallel group trials were included representing 514 individuals. Daily doses of 300, 600, 800 and 1200mg of remacemide were tested. The overall relative risk (RR) for remacemide versus placebo with 95% confidence intervals(CI) for a 50 per cent or greater reduction in seizure frequency was 1.59(95% CI 0.91 to 2.79). Due to differences in response rates among trials, regression models were unable to provide reliable estimates of responses to individual doses. Regression models did however suggest a significant effect for 800-1200mg remacemide per day. Remacemide was more likely to be withdrawn than placebo, the RR for treatment withdrawal was 1.90(95% CI 1.00 to 3.60). The RR for dizziness indicates that it is significantly associated with remacemide 3.08(99% CI 1.37 to 6.95). Effects on cognition and quality of life were not reported.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Given the modest effect on seizure frequency and significant withdrawal rate it is unlikely that remacemide will be further developed as an antiepileptic drug.