The DIEP Flap as Well-established Method of Choice for Autologous Breast Reconstruction with a Low Complication Rate - Retrospective Single-centre 10-Year Experience

A DIEP Dive into Patient Risk Factors for Hernia and Bulge Development: A Meta-regression

BACKGROUND

 This meta-regression aims to investigate risk factors for abdominal hernia and bulge in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and the effect of prophylactic mesh placement on postoperative complications.

METHODS

 A systematic search was conducted in July of 2022 in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Seventy-four studies published between 2000 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-four studies were included in the analysis for bulge and 71 studies were included in the analysis for hernia. Meta-regressions were run on the proportion of patients experiencing hernia or bulge to assess for patient risk factors and the role of prophylactic mesh placement. Proportions were transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine method.

RESULTS

 The average rates of hernia and bulge after DIEP flaps were found to be 0.18% and 1.26%, respectively. Increased age (β = 0.0059, p = 0.0117), prior abdominal surgery (β = 0.0008, p = 0.046), and pregnancy history (β = -0.0015, p = 0.0001) were significantly associated with hernia. Active smoking (β = 0.0032, p = 0.0262) and pregnancy history (β = 0.0019, p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with bulge. Neither the perforator vessel laterality nor the number of perforator vessels harvested had any association with hernia or bulge. Prophylactic mesh placement was not associated with hernia or bulge.

CONCLUSION

 Understanding the comorbidities associated with hernia or bulge following DIEP flap breast reconstruction, such as advanced age, prior abdominal surgery, pregnancy history, and active smoking status, allows surgeons to proactively identify and educate high-risk patients. Future studies may further explore whether prophylactic mesh placement offers patients any benefit.

Secondary solution for breast reconstruction following total DIEP flap loss: A single-center experience after 3270 DIEP flaps

BACKGROUND

Total deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap failure is a significant concern in autologous breast reconstruction. Literature on secondary reconstruction options following total flap failure is limited. This study outlines the outcomes of patients who underwent reconstruction post-DIEP flap failure at our institution.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients receiving autologous breast reconstruction between 2004 and 2021. We aimed to identify causes of total DIEP flap failure, outcomes of revision surgery, and outcomes of secondary breast reconstruction procedures.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2021, 3456 free flaps for breast reconstruction were performed, with 3270 being DIEP flaps for 2756 patients. DIEP flap failure was observed in 40 cases (1.22%). Bilateral reconstructions had a higher failure rate (2.31%) than unilateral (0.72%). The primary cause was intraoperative complications during flap harvest (18 cases), followed by insufficient arterial perfusion (seven cases). Other causes included postoperative hematoma (seven cases), venous congestion (six cases), and late-onset fat necrosis (two cases). Post-failure, five patients received a second free flap with three cases of repeated flap failure. Twenty patients received implant-based reconstruction with two cases of reconstruction failure, while seven patients received a pedicled latissimus dorsi (LD) flap reconstructions with no cases of reconstruction failure. Eight patients declined further reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

A second free flap post-DIEP failure was associated with a high risk of reconstruction failure, suggesting the need for careful patient selection. Implant-based and pedicled LD flap seem to be reliable secondary reconstruction options.

The Influence of Inset and Shaping of Abdominal-Based Free Flap Breast Reconstruction on Patient-Reported Aesthetic Outcome Scores-A Systematic Review

Background: Nowadays, multimodal cancer therapy results in very high survival rates of early-stage breast cancer and microsurgical flap-based breast reconstruction has become safe and reliable, with gradually increasing demand because of its durable and aesthetically pleasing results. This study aimed to explore the impact of different flap shaping and inset techniques on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with regard to the aesthetic result in abdominal flap-based breast reconstruction. Methods: A systematic review was performed screening Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science for original articles reporting flap inset strategies, concomitantly providing PROMs on the aesthetic result. Results: Of 319 studies identified, six met the inclusion criteria. The studies described different flap rotation options according to the patient's morphology, different inset planes, and avoidance of the monitoring skin paddle, and suggested that a higher flap-to-mastectomy mass ratio was associated with better aesthetic results. In two comparative studies, according to the PROMs (BREAST-Q, Likert scale) and independent observer judgement, both higher patient satisfaction and superior aesthetic results were observed with the newly described techniques. Conclusions: Emphasis on the aesthetic outcome in terms of breast shape and symmetry, providing an individualized approach of flap inset, considering the contralateral breast's shape and volume, results in higher satisfaction scores.

Autologous breast reconstruction in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review of current practices and challenges

INTRODUCTION

Efforts to improve global healthcare persist, yet LMICs face challenges accessing surgical care, especially breast reconstruction amidst rising breast cancer cases. This review evaluates the present state and challenges of autologous breast reconstruction in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Utilizing the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Collaboration's standards, databases such as EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, PubMed, and Google Scholar were examined for studies on breast reconstruction in LMICs (based on the World Bank's 2022-2023 definitions) up to August 2022. Articles and case reports focusing on autologous reconstruction following breast cancer surgery in these regions were incorporated.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

From an initial 288 articles, 19 met the criteria after thorough assessment. These articles documented 4899 patient cases from LMICs, with the breakdown being: 11 on LD flaps, nine on TRAM flaps, eight on DIEP flaps, two on TDAP flaps, and one on TMG flap. Flap necrosis emerged as the prevalent complication in four studies.

CONCLUSIONS

While autologous breast reconstruction presents superior aesthetic benefits without notable long-term economic setbacks, its adoption in LMICs is limited. This is partly due to the domination of implant-based methods among patients and surgeons, selected due to convenience. The scarcity of concrete evidence and standardized metrics in LMICs clouds the understanding of this procedure. Despite its advantages, awareness is low, necessitating more training and awareness campaigns. Uniform reporting, quality data, and financial analysis can provide a comprehensive LMIC understanding, aiding future research.

Skin deformation analysis for pre-operative planning of DIEAP flap reconstruction surgery

Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap reconstruction surgeries can potentially benefit from augmented reality (AR) in the context of surgery planning and outcomes improvement. Although three-dimensional (3D) models help visualize and map the perforators, the anchorage of the models to the patient's body during surgery does not consider eventual skin deformation from the moment of computed tomography angiography (CTA) data acquisition until the position of the patient while in surgery. In this work, we compared the 3D deformation registration from supine arms down (CTA position) to supine with arms at 90° degrees (surgical position), estimating the patient's skin deformation. We processed the data sets of 20 volunteers with a 3D rigid registration tool and performed a descriptive statistical analysis and statistical inference. With 2.45 mm of root mean square and 2.89 mm of standard deviation, results include 30% cases of deformation above 3 mm and 15% above 4 mm. Pose transformation deformation indicates that 3D surface data from the CTA scan position differs from data acquired in loco at the surgical table. Such results indicate that research should be conducted to construct accurate 3D models using CTA data to display on the patient, while considering projection errors when using AR technology.

Risk Stratification of Surgical Site Outcomes by BMI & Flap Type in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Afflicting 2 million lives annually worldwide, breast cancer remains devastating. This study utilized a continuously updated network of electronic medical records (TriNetX Inc, Cambridge, MA) for analysis of 90-day postoperative outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction by increasing body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

The deidentified electronic medical records (EMRs) of 29,453,000 females, age 18-99 years, were retrospectively screened from 45 healthcare organizations. A combined cohort of 7136 patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction via transverse rectus abdominus muscle (TRAM), deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), or latissimus flap was categorized by BMI into 5 subgroups: normal (n = 3568), overweight (n = 1239), class I (n = 1166), class II (n = 807), and class III (n = 356) obesity. The normal BMI cohort was then compared with each elevated BMI cohort. BMI strata were analyzed for risk of surgical-site occurrences within 90 days of surgery using CPT codes. Stringent propensity score matching was performed.

RESULTS

For the combined group (N = 7136), significant linear increases in risk were observed with increasing BMI for infection (risk ratio [RR] 1.39-2.91,p < 0.05) and dehiscence (RR 2.65-5.17, p < 0.05). Similar linear increases were observed for the abdominally based group (N = 5454) for infection (RR 1.45-2.47, p < 0.05) and dehiscence (RR 2.54-4.77, p < 0.05). For DIEP (N = 4874), near-linear increases were observed for infection (RR 1.60-2.79, p < 0.05) and dehiscence (RR 1.57-5.59, p < 0.05). For TRAM (N = 714), significant increases were observed for seroma, infection, dehiscence, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), sepsis, and PE while increased risks of seroma, DVT, PE, and hernia were observed for latissimus (N = 1380).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of flap type, our analysis suggests that a BMI> 39.9 is the inflection point beyond which it may be beneficial not to perform autologous breast reconstruction. Limitations include this study's retrospective nature; thus, future prospective studies would be beneficial.

The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Breast Reconstruction Outcomes and Complications: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

As the incidence of breast cancer and diabetes rises, so does the number of patients with diabetes undergoing breast reconstruction (BR). Patients with diabetes are at a higher risk for post-operative complications. The current study examined the effects of diabetes on BR wound outcomes and overall complications post-operatively.

METHODS

This study followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted a systematic search and meta-analysis for published articles on the effects of DM on BR in January 2022 using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases. Diabetes, breast reconstruction, and complications were used as keywords.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and five provided data to be included in the meta-analysis published between 2006 and 2020. A total of 19,731 patients (9.07%) had diabetes, whereas 197,812 patients had no diabetes. The results of the pooled outcomes revealed no differences in the risk of total flap loss (p = 0.892) and wound infection (p = 0.579,). Nevertheless, the risk of wound dehiscence was significantly higher among patients with diabetes than their non-diabetic counterparts (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Diabetic patients undergoing BR have a significantly higher risk of wound dehiscence. As a result of the adverse effects of diabetes status on BR outcomes, patients need to be counseled about optimizing their diabetes management before surgery. Because of the heterogeneity in our results, prospective randomized studies are needed to shed light on the consequences of diabetes mellitus in BR surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Comparing seroma formation rate after harvest of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap and the superficial abdominal perforator flaps in autologous breast reconstruction: A propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Donor site seroma formation and prolonged drainage duration are commonly seen after harvest of perforator-based abdominal flaps. The lymphatic network including the lymphatic vessels and the lymph nodes can be traumatized during harvest of a perforator-based abdominal flap, eventually causing seroma formation. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative seroma occurrence rates between the deep system group including the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap and the superficial system group comprised of the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap, the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap, and the SIEA-SCIP combined flap.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction using perforator-based abdominal flaps from June 2020 to May 2021 was performed. The patients were divided into the deep system group and the superficial system group. Propensity score matching was used to compare in the two groups the mean duration of drainage in the donor site and the occurrence of postoperative aspiration. Covariates included sex, age, body mass index, history of smoking, past history of diabetes mellitus. One hundred and fifteen patients (the deep system group, n = 100 and the superficial system group, n = 15) met inclusion criteria for a 1:1 match performed on 14 deep system group patients using propensity scores, with 14 superficial system group patients having similar characteristics.

RESULTS

The mean duration of drainage in the donor site was shorter in the deep system group (6.6 ± 1.9 days) than in the superficial system group (9.3 ± 2.3 days, p < .01). The occurrence rate of postoperative aspiration was lower in the deep system group (0%) than in the superficial system group (50%, p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although superficial abdominal perforator flaps are considered to be less invasive than the DIEP flap, they are associated with prolonged donor site drainage and more frequent occurrence rate of postoperative aspiration.

Comparing Seroma Formation at the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, Transverse Musculocutaneous Gracilis, and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Donor Sites after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

Background  Seroma formation is the most common donor site complication following autologous breast reconstruction, along with hematoma. Seroma may lead to patient discomfort and may prolong hospital stay or delay adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to compare seroma rates between the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG), and superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) donor sites. Methods  The authors conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study consisting of chart review of all patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from April 2018 to June 2020. The primary outcome studied was frequency of seroma formation at the different donor sites. The secondary outcome evaluated potential prognostic properties associated with seroma formation. Third, the number of donor site seroma evacuations was compared between the three donor sites. Results  Overall, 242 breast reconstructions were performed in 189 patients. Demographic data were found statistically comparable between the three flap cohorts, except for body mass index (BMI). Frequency of seroma formation was highest at the SGAP donor site (75.0%), followed by the TMG (65.0%), and DIEP (28.6%) donor sites. No association was found between seroma formation and BMI, age at surgery, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or DIEP laterality. The mean number of seroma evacuations was significantly higher in the SGAP and the TMG group compared with the DIEP group. Conclusion  This study provides a single center's experience regarding seroma formation at the donor site after microsurgical breast reconstruction. The observed rate of donor site seroma formation was comparably high, especially in the TMG and SGAP group, necessitating an adaption of the surgical protocol.

[Breast Reconstruction Strategies in Case of Planned Radiotherapy]

INTRODUCTION

The ideal technical and chronological approach of breast reconstruction in case of planned radiotherapy after mastectomy (post-mastectomy radiotherapy, PMRT) continues to be controversially discussed.

METHODS

The authors analysed the MEDLINE Database PubMed for relevant studies concerning PMRT and breast reconstruction. The main theses from these publications were extracted and summarised.

RESULTS

An implant-based approach is the least invasive technique for immediate breast-mound formation in a PMRT setting. Reconstruction in a PMRT setting with a two-stage expander-implant technique or expander-implant-autologous procedure can provide good to excellent cosmetic outcomes. In contrast to the implant-based approach, autologous reconstruction methods provide an improved quality of life as well as haptic and sensory advantages and are usually associated with lower complication rates. PMRT after autologous reconstruction can have a negative impact on the autologous tissue. A delayed autologous approach can be advantageous and should be generally favoured in high-risk patients.

CONCLUSION

Factors influencing a meticulous planning of breast reconstruction including PMRT are surgical, aesthetic and patient characteristics, quality of life, preference and expectation. Ideally, PMRT is completed before autologous reconstruction to avoid radiation-associated side-effects on the final reconstructive result. If PMRT is likely, but potentially not necessary, an immediate-delayed procedure may be of advantage.

A national analysis of outpatient mastectomy and breast reconstruction trends from 2013 through 2019

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, patients with breast reconstruction (BR) were hospitalized at least one day postoperatively. However, new trends suggest that outpatient surgery is a viable and safe alternative. This study aims to assess trends among patients with breast cancer who underwent outpatient mastectomy alone, with immediate BR (IBR) or delayed BR (DBR).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the 2013-2019 ACS NSQIP® database was conducted. All women who underwent outpatient mastectomy were included in this study. The cohort was divided as follows: (1) mastectomy without BR, (2) IBR, and (3) DBR. A Cochran-Armitage test and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models were performed to evaluate linear trends over time within groups, and overall and pairwise comparisons between groups across the years, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 84,954 women were included in this study. Overall, 54.9%, 16.2%, and 28.9% underwent mastectomy without BR, IBR, and DBR, respectively. From the BR groups, the majority had implant placement. A significant difference in incidence trends between the three groups was evidenced over time (p<0.001). The greatest increase was evidenced in the IBR group and the lowest in the mastectomy without BR group.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients, a significant difference in linear trends was evidenced over time within and between the three groups. Our results suggest that outpatient IBR procedures are increasing in a greater proportion compared to other surgical approaches. Further studies are required to better characterize this population and comprehend the decision-making process toward a surgical procedure within each of the three groups.

Management of patients with BRCA mutation from the point of view of a breast surgeon

Germ-line mutation in BRCA (BReast CAncer gene) 1 or BRCA2 are found in 3–4% of all women with breast cancer. These patients have a significant increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. They are often younger when diagnosed with the mutation, and the possible breast cancer they get is often aggressive with inferior outcome. There are risk reducing strategies, and the most powerful strategy is risk reducing surgery, both risk reducing bilateral mastectomy (RRM) and risk reducing bilateral salpino-oophorectomy (PBSO). This review is meant to address breast surgery in patients with germline BRCA mutation. The guidelines and techniques applied is under continuous change and it is important for the clinicians to be well informed to provide the patient with the information needed for them to make an informed decision on what risk strategy to choose.

•

Patients with germ-line mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have a significant increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

•

There are different risk reducing strategies and the most powerful strategy is risk-reducing surgery, both risk reducing bilateral mastectomy and risk reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

•

Guidelines and techniques for the risk reducing surgery of the breast are under continuous change and improvement.

•

Breast conserving therapy is not associated with worse survival and is a good option for a BRCA mutation carrier diagnosed with breast cancer. Risk-reducing mastectomy can be performed in a later setting.

•

The management of BRCA mutation carriers, both affected and unaffected, should be performed in a multidisciplinary team. Physicians need to be systematically educated and updated on the most recent literature.

Prevalence and Utilization of Obturator Artery Anatomic Variant in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 The objective of this study is to quantify the prevalence and describe the utilization of an anatomic vascular variant in which the obturator artery (OA) arises from the trunk of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) in stacked/dual-pedicled autologous breast reconstruction. When this variant is identified preoperatively on computed tomography angiography (CTA), it may be utilized in a "flow-through" fashion to direct antegrade internal mammary artery (IMA) flow into a second free flap to facilitate anastomotic arrangement and optimize perfusion.

METHODS

 Preoperatively obtained abdomen/pelvis CTA imaging of 121 autologous breast reconstruction patients were retrospectively reviewed for the unilateral or bilateral presence of the OA branch arising from the DIEA (OA variant). The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

 Our analysis revealed the presence of the OA variant in 60 of the 121 (49.6%) breast reconstruction candidates, either unilaterally or bilaterally. Out of these patients, the variant was present unilaterally in 33 (55%) and bilaterally in 27 (45%) patients. Of the unilateral variants, 12 (36.4%) patients demonstrated right-sided laterality, while 21 (63.6%) patients demonstrated left-sided laterality. Clinically, this anatomic variant has been utilized in several cases of autologous breast reconstruction with flap survival in all cases.

CONCLUSION

 Utilization of this anatomic variant in stacked or dual-pedicled autologous breast reconstruction results in antegrade IMA perfusion of both primary and secondary flaps, as well as improved size match compared with other anastomotic options. Knowledge of the vascular anatomy and variations in the inferior epigastric system is crucial to both preventing complications and optimizing flap planning and outcome.