1
|
Sissingh NJ, de Rijk FEM, Timmerhuis HC, Umans DS, Anten MPGF, Bouwense SAW, van Delft F, van Eijck BC, Erkelens WG, Hazen WL, Kuiken SD, Quispel R, Romkens TEH, Schwartz MP, Seerden TC, Spanier BWM, Verlaan T, Vleggaar FP, Voermans RP, Verdonk RC, van Hooft JE. Gallstones as a cause in presumed acute alcoholic pancreatitis: observational multicentre study. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae107. [PMID: 38713609 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on the incidence and clinical relevance of gallstones in patients with suspected acute alcoholic pancreatitis are lacking and are essential to minimize the risk of recurrent acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of gallstones and the associated rate of recurrent acute pancreatitis in patients with presumed acute alcoholic pancreatitis. METHODS Between 2008 and 2019, 23 hospitals prospectively enrolled patients with acute pancreatitis. Those diagnosed with their first episode of presumed acute alcoholic pancreatitis were included in this study. The term gallstones was used to describe the presence of cholelithiasis or biliary sludge found during imaging. The primary outcome was pancreatitis recurrence during 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 334 patients were eligible for inclusion, of whom 316 were included in the follow-up analysis. Gallstone evaluation, either during the index admission or during follow-up, was performed for 306 of 334 patients (91.6%). Gallstones were detected in 54 patients (17.6%), with a median time to detection of 6 (interquartile range 0-42) weeks. During follow-up, recurrent acute pancreatitis occurred in 121 of 316 patients (38.3%), with a significantly higher incidence rate for patients with gallstones compared with patients without gallstones (59% versus 34.2% respectively; P < 0.001), while more patients with gallstones had stopped drinking alcohol at the time of their first recurrence (41% versus 24% respectively; P = 0.020). Cholecystectomy was performed for 19 patients with gallstones (36%). The recurrence rate was lower for patients in the cholecystectomy group compared with patients who did receive inadequate treatment or no treatment (5/19 versus 19/34 respectively; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION Gallstones were found in almost one in every five patients diagnosed with acute alcoholic pancreatitis. Gallstones were associated with a higher rate of recurrent pancreatitis, while undergoing cholecystectomy was associated with a reduction in this rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor J Sissingh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Fleur E M de Rijk
- Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester C Timmerhuis
- Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Devica S Umans
- Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Paule G F Anten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan A W Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- NUTRIM, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Foke van Delft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Brechje C van Eijck
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Willemien G Erkelens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd D Kuiken
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Romkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander MC, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Tom C Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - B W Marcel Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Verlaan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gómez Pérez A, Aparicio Serrano A, Serrano Ruiz FJ. Etiological diagnosis of recurrent acute pancreatitis. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2024. [PMID: 38685884 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10404/2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis is the leading cause of inpatient care among gastrointestinal conditions. Despite early intervention, one-third of patients experience recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP). A comprehensive diagnostic approach is warranted to identify and treat underlying factors in order to prevent recurrence. RAP is most frequent among men aged 30-40, smokers, and in those with excessive alcohol consumption. To identify the etiology is paramount to stratify patients according to their individual risk of RAP and for predicting an eventual evolution to chronic pancreatitis. Although the initial management of acute pancreatitis is widely homogeneous according to established guidelines, there are no defined protocols to investigate RAP. In the present editorial article we propose a structured algorithm with precise recommendations to investigate the etiology RAP as part of routine clinical practice. Although there are relevant knowledge gaps in this disease, we believe that our guidance would contribute for a more homogenous diagnostic approach of RAP in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Gómez Pérez
- Clinical Management Unit of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, España
| | - Ana Aparicio Serrano
- Clinical Management Unit of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG, Sauer B, Yang A, Conwell DL, Yadlapati RH, Gardner TB. American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119:419-437. [PMID: 38857482 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP), defined as acute inflammation of the pancreas, is one of the most common diseases of the gastrointestinal tract leading to hospital admission in the United States. It is important for clinicians to appreciate that AP is heterogenous, progressing differently among patients and is often unpredictable. While most patients experience symptoms lasting a few days, almost one-fifth of patients will go on to experience complications, including pancreatic necrosis and/or organ failure, at times requiring prolonged hospitalization, intensive care, and radiologic, surgical, and/or endoscopic intervention. Early management is essential to identify and treat patients with AP to prevent complications. Patients with biliary pancreatitis typically will require surgery to prevent recurrent disease and may need early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography if the disease is complicated by cholangitis. Nutrition plays an important role in treating patients with AP. The safety of early refeeding and importance in preventing complications from AP are addressed. This guideline will provide an evidence-based practical approach to the management of patients with AP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Tenner
- State University of New York, Health Sciences Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | | | - Sunil G Sheth
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bryan Sauer
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Umans DS, Timmerhuis HC, Anten MPGF, Bhalla A, Bijlsma RA, Boxhoorn L, Brink MA, Bruno MJ, Curvers WL, van Eijck BC, Erkelens GW, van Geenen EJM, Hazen WL, Hoge CV, Hol L, Inderson A, Kager LM, Kuiken SD, Perk LE, Quispel R, Römkens TEH, Sperna Weiland CJ, Thijssen AY, Venneman NG, Verdonk RC, van Wanrooij RLJ, Witteman BJ, Besselink MG, van Hooft JE. Prospective multicentre study of indications for surgery in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis following endoscopic ultrasonography (PICUS). Br J Surg 2023; 110:1877-1882. [PMID: 37811814 PMCID: PMC10638543 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholecystectomy in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) is controversial. A randomized trial found cholecystectomy to reduce the recurrence rate of IAP but did not include preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). As EUS is effective in detecting gallstone disease, cholecystectomy may be indicated only in patients with gallstone disease. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of EUS in patients with IAP, and the rate of recurrent pancreatitis in patients in whom EUS could not determine the aetiology (EUS-negative IAP). METHODS This prospective multicentre cohort study included patients with a first episode of IAP who underwent outpatient EUS. The primary outcome was detection of aetiology by EUS. Secondary outcomes included adverse events after EUS, recurrence of pancreatitis, and quality of life during 1-year follow-up. RESULTS After screening 957 consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis from 24 centres, 105 patients with IAP were included and underwent EUS. In 34 patients (32 per cent), EUS detected an aetiology: (micro)lithiasis and biliary sludge (23.8 per cent), chronic pancreatitis (6.7 per cent), and neoplasms (2.9 per cent); 2 of the latter patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. During 1-year follow-up, the pancreatitis recurrence rate was 17 per cent (12 of 71) among patients with EUS-negative IAP versus 6 per cent (2 of 34) among those with positive EUS. Recurrent pancreatitis was associated with poorer quality of life. CONCLUSION EUS detected an aetiology in a one-third of patients with a first episode of IAP, requiring mostly cholecystectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy. The role of cholecystectomy in patients with EUS-negative IAP remains uncertain and warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devica S Umans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Hester C Timmerhuis
- Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Marie-Paule G F Anten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Abha Bhalla
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Rina A Bijlsma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Lotte Boxhoorn
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Menno A Brink
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Curvers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Brechje C van Eijck
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - G Willemien Erkelens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - Erwin J M van Geenen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Chantal V Hoge
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lieke Hol
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Akin Inderson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth M Kager
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd D Kuiken
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lars E Perk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical Centre Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - Christina J Sperna Weiland
- Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Y Thijssen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Niels G Venneman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ben J Witteman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cammarata F, Rovati L, Fontana P, Gambitta P, Armellino A, Aseni P. Endoscopic Ultrasound to Identify the Actual Cause of Idiopathic Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3256. [PMID: 37892077 PMCID: PMC10606009 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) presents a diagnostic challenge and refers to cases where the cause of acute pancreatitis remains uncertain despite a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as a valuable tool in the diagnostic workup of IAP. This review explores the pivotal role of EUS in detecting the actual cause of IAP and assessing its accuracy, timing, safety, and future technological improvement. In this review, we investigate the role of EUS in identifying the actual cause of IAP by examining the available literature. We aim to assess possible existing evidence regarding EUS accuracy, timing, and safety and explore potential trends of future technological improvements in EUS for diagnostic purposes. Following PRISMA guidelines, 60 pertinent studies were selected and analysed. EUS emerges as a crucial diagnostic tool, particularly when conventional imaging fails. It can offer intricate visualization of the pancreas, biliary system, and adjacent structures. Microlithiasis, biliary sludge, chronic pancreatitis, and small pancreatic tumors seem to be much more accurately identified with EUS in the setting of IAP. The optimal timing for EUS is post-resolution of the acute phase of the disease. With a low rate of complications, EUS poses minimal safety concerns. EUS-guided interventions, including fine-needle aspiration, collection drainage, and biopsies, aid in the cytological analysis. With high diagnostic accuracy, safety, and therapeutic potential, EUS is able to improve patient outcomes when managing IAP. Further refinement of EUS techniques and cost-effectiveness assessment of EUS-guided approaches need to be explored in multicentre prospective studies. This review underscores EUS as a transformative tool in unraveling IAP's enigma and advancing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cammarata
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy;
| | - Lucrezia Rovati
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Emergency Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Fontana
- Department of Gastroenterology, ASST Ovest Milanese, 20025 Legnano, Italy; (P.F.); (P.G.)
| | - Pietro Gambitta
- Department of Gastroenterology, ASST Ovest Milanese, 20025 Legnano, Italy; (P.F.); (P.G.)
| | - Antonio Armellino
- Endoscopy Division, Ospedale San Leopoldo Mandic di Merate, ASST Lecco, 23807 Lecco, Italy;
| | - Paolo Aseni
- Emergency Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences “L. Sacco”, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Żorniak M, Sirtl S, Beyer G, Mahajan UM, Bretthauer K, Schirra J, Schulz C, Kohlmann T, Lerch MM, Mayerle J. Consensus definition of sludge and microlithiasis as a possible cause of pancreatitis. Gut 2023; 72:1919-1926. [PMID: 37072178 PMCID: PMC10511955 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In up to 20% of patients, the aetiology of acute pancreatitis (AP) remains elusive and is thus called idiopathic. On more detailed review these cases can often be explained through biliary disease and are amenable to treatment. Findings range from biliary sludge to microlithiasis but their definitions remain fluid and controversial. DESIGN A systematic literature review (1682 reports, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines) analysed definitions of biliary sludge and microlithiasis, followed by an online international expert survey (30 endoscopic ultrasound/hepatobiliary and pancreatic experts; 36 items) which led to definitions of both. These were consented by Delphi voting and clinically evaluated in a retrospective cohort of patients with presumed biliary pancreatitis. RESULTS In 13% of original articles and 19.2% of reviews, microlithiasis and biliary sludge were used synonymously. In the survey, 41.7% of experts described the term 'sludge' and 'microlithiasis' as identical findings. As a consequence, three definitions were proposed, agreed on and confirmed by voting to distinctly discriminate between biliary sludge (hyperechoic material without acoustic shadowing) and microlithiasis (echorich calculi of ≤5 mm with acoustic shadowing) as opposed to larger biliary stones, both for location in gallbladder and bile ducts. In an initial attempt to investigate the clinical relevance in a retrospective analysis in 177 confirmed cases in our hospital, there was no difference in severity of AP if caused by sludge, microlithiasis or stones. CONCLUSION We propose a consensus definition for the localisation, ultrasound morphology and diameter of biliary sludge and microlithiasis as distinct entities. Interestingly, severity of biliary AP was not dependent on the size of concrements warranting prospective randomised studies which treatment options are adequate to prevent recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Żorniak
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Simon Sirtl
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Georg Beyer
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Jörg Schirra
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Kohlmann
- Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sirtl S, Żorniak M, Hohmann E, Beyer G, Dibos M, Wandel A, Phillip V, Ammer-Herrmenau C, Neesse A, Schulz C, Schirra J, Mayerle J, Mahajan UM. Machine learning-based decision tool for selecting patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis for endosonography to exclude a biliary aetiology. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:5138-5153. [PMID: 37744295 PMCID: PMC10514757 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i35.5138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biliary microlithiasis/sludge is detected in approximately 30% of patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP). As recurrent biliary pancreatitis can be prevented, the underlying aetiology of IAP should be established. AIM To develop a machine learning (ML) based decision tool for the use of endosonography (EUS) in pancreatitis patients to detect sludge and microlithiasis. METHODS We retrospectively used routinely recorded clinical and laboratory parameters of 218 consecutive patients with confirmed AP admitted to our tertiary care hospital between 2015 and 2020. Patients who did not receive EUS as part of the diagnostic work-up and whose pancreatitis episode could be adequately explained by other causes than biliary sludge and microlithiasis were excluded. We trained supervised ML classifiers using H2O.ai automatically selecting the best suitable predictor model to predict microlithiasis/sludge. The predictor model was further validated in two independent retrospective cohorts from two tertiary care centers (117 patients). RESULTS Twenty-eight categorized patients' variables recorded at admission were identified to compute the predictor model with an accuracy of 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.791-0.9185], positive predictive value of 0.84, and negative predictive value of 0.80 in the identification cohort (218 patients). In the validation cohort, the robustness of the prediction model was confirmed with an accuracy of 0.76 (95%CI: 0.673-0.8347), positive predictive value of 0.76, and negative predictive value of 0.78 (117 patients). CONCLUSION We present a robust and validated ML-based predictor model consisting of routinely recorded parameters at admission that can predict biliary sludge and microlithiasis as the cause of AP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Sirtl
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Michal Żorniak
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich 81377, Germany
- Department of Endoscopy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice 44-113, Poland
| | - Eric Hohmann
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Georg Beyer
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Miriam Dibos
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Annika Wandel
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Veit Phillip
- Department of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Christoph Ammer-Herrmenau
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center, Göttingen 37075, Germany
| | - Albrecht Neesse
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University Medical Center, Göttingen 37075, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Jörg Schirra
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich 81377, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cortés P, Kumbhari V, Antwi SO, Wallace MB, Raimondo M, Ji B, Bi Y. Simple risk score to predict the likelihood of a positive EUS in idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:993-1001.e5. [PMID: 35850170 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We sought to derive a risk score, DORM65, of known variables to predict the likelihood of a positive EUS in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP). METHODS A retrospective cohort study of 180 patients with IAP was performed across 3 tertiary care centers between January 2018 and December 2021. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was performed to predict a positive EUS. Accuracy of the models was assessed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROCC). RESULTS The diagnostic yield of EUS was 58.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.7-66.1). The DORM65 scores of 5 predictors present before EUS with the best discrimination were a delayed EUS (defined as ≥82 days from the last episode of AP), obesity, not having had a repeated transabdominal US, male sex, and age ≥65 years at the time of EUS. For those at the lowest risk score group, the positive EUS rate was 13.0% compared with 100% in those at the highest risk group (relative risk, 7.67; P < .001). A score of 3 or more had a positive predictive value of 86.0% with a sensitivity of 34.9% and specificity of 91.9%. The model had a high predictive accuracy (AUROCC, .774; 95% CI, .707-.841). Adding 3 additional predictors (no cholecystectomy, no MRCP, and a single episode of AP) did not increase the accuracy significantly (AUROCC, .805; 95% CI, .742-.867). CONCLUSIONS DORM65 is easily calculated and accurately predicts a positive EUS in patients with IAP. Further validation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Cortés
- Division of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Samuel O Antwi
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Massimo Raimondo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Baoan Ji
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Yan Bi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rana SS. Evaluating the role of endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatitis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:953-965. [PMID: 36263489 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2138856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) provides high-resolution images of both pancreatic parenchyma and duct and therefore is an integral component of evaluating and treating patients with pancreatitis and its complications. The development of enhanced EUS imaging techniques and newer EUS-specific accessories has expanded the diagnostic and therapeutic role of EUS in patients with acute and chronic pancreatitis (CP). AREAS COVERED This review discusses the current diagnostic and therapeutic role of EUS in acute pancreatitis (AP), CP, and autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). EXPERT OPINION EUS plays a vital role in patients with AP by confirming the presence of common bile duct (CBD) stones in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis and intermediate probability of CBD stones. It plays an important role in the etiological evaluation of patients with idiopathic acute and recurrent pancreatitis. EUS is also an essential modality for diagnosing and managing pancreatico-biliary as well as gastroduodenal complications associated with CP. EUS-guided FNB using newer generation core biopsy needles has made possible accurate diagnosis of AIP by providing tissue samples with preserved architecture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surinder Singh Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mazza S, Elvo B, Conti CB, Drago A, Verga MC, Soro S, De Silvestri A, Cereatti F, Grassia R. Endoscopic ultrasound diagnostic gain over computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholang iopancreatography in defining etiology of idiopathic acute pancreatitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14:376-386. [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i6.376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 10%-30% of acute pancreatitis remain idiopathic (IAP) even after clinical and imaging tests, including abdominal ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). This is a relevant issue, as up to 20% of patients with IAP have recurrent episodes and 26% of them develop chronic pancreatitis. Few data are available on the role of EUS in clarifying the etiology of IAP after failure of one or more cross-sectional techniques.
AIM To evaluate the diagnostic gain after failure of one or more previous cross-sectional exams.
METHODS We retrospectively collected data about consecutive patients with AP and at least one negative test between US, CECT and MRCP, who underwent linear EUS between January 2017 and December 2020. We investigated the EUS diagnostic yield and the EUS diagnostic gain over different combinations of these cross-sectional imaging techniques for the etiologic diagnosis of AP. Types and frequency of EUS diagnosis were also analyzed, and EUS diagnosis was compared with the clinical parameters. After EUS, patients were followed-up for a median of 31.5 mo to detect cases of pancreatitis recurrence.
RESULTS We enrolled 81 patients (63% males, mean age 61 ± 18, 23% with previous cholecystectomy, 17% with recurrent pancreatitis). Overall EUS diagnostic yield for AP etiological diagnosis was 79% (20% lithiasis, 31% acute on chronic pancreatitis, 14% pancreatic solid or cystic lesions, 5% pancreas divisum, 5% autoimmune pancreatitis, 5% ductal abnormalities), while 21% remained idiopathic. US, CECT and MRCP, taken alone or in combination, led to AP etiological diagnosis in 16 (20%) patients; among the remaining 65 patients, 49 (75%) obtained a diagnosis at EUS, with an overall EUS diagnostic gain of 61%. Sixty-eight patients had negative US; among them, EUS allowed etiological diagnosis in 59 (87%). Sixty-three patients had a negative CECT; among them, 47 (74%) obtained diagnosis with EUS. Twenty-four had a negative MRCP; among them, 20 (83%) had EUS diagnosis. Twenty-one had negative CT + MRCP, of which 17 (81%) had EUS diagnosis, with a EUS diagnostic gain of 63%. Patients with biliary etiology and without previous cholecystectomy had higher median values of alanine aminotransferase (154 vs 25, P = 0.010), aspartate aminotransferase (95 vs 29, P = 0.018), direct bilirubin (1.2 vs 0.6, P = 0.015), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (180 vs 48, P = 0.006) and alkaline phosphatase (150 vs 72, P = 0.015) Chronic pancreatitis diagnosis was more frequent in patients with recurrent pancreatitis at baseline (82% vs 21%, P < 0.001). During the follow-up, AP recurred in 3 patients, one of which remained idiopathic.
CONCLUSION EUS is a good test to define AP etiology. It showed a 63% diagnostic gain over CECT + MRCP. In suitable patients, EUS should always be performed in cases of IAP. Further prospective studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Mazza
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona 26100, Italy
| | - Biagio Elvo
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Federico II University, Napoli 80131, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Drago
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona 26100, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Verga
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona 26100, Italy
| | - Sara Soro
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona 26100, Italy
| | - Annalisa De Silvestri
- Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Scientific Direction, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, Pavia 27100, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Cereatti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Castelli Hospital, Ariccia (Rm) 00040, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassia
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona 26100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Blank V, Gößmann H, Karlas T. [Imaging diagnostics of chronic pancreatitis]. Internist (Berl) 2021; 62:1015-1024. [PMID: 34542657 DOI: 10.1007/s00108-021-01156-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Chronic pancreatitis is characterized by recurrent inflammatory episodes. The diagnosis is based on the detection of pathognomonic morphological alterations by ultrasound-based methods as well as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, imaging techniques play an important role for the differential diagnostics of potential complications in patients with chronic pancreatitis and for regular monitoring of patients with increased cancer risk. This article summarizes the current guideline recommendations for medical imaging procedures in chronic pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Blank
- Medizinische Klinik II, Bereich Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Holger Gößmann
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Karlas
- Medizinische Klinik II, Bereich Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
[Imaging diagnostics in acute pancreatitis]. Internist (Berl) 2021; 62:1044-1054. [PMID: 34524469 DOI: 10.1007/s00108-021-01153-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Abdominal imaging is an important component of the diagnostics of acute pancreatitis. In addition to the clinical features and the laboratory constellation, it serves to establish the diagnosis or the exclusion of other diseases and also the identification and assessment of the course of local complications and vascular changes that can arise during the course of acute pancreatitis. Due to the numerous imaging examination methods that are available, their combination options and the different examination times, there are diverse application options that have to be taken into account, such as the severity and duration of the disease, concomitant diseases and complications of acute pancreatitis. A rational use of imaging is an important prerequisite for high quality and at the same time cost-effective patient care. This review summarizes the current importance of imaging in acute pancreatitis, with particular reference to the updated S3 guidelines on acute pancreatitis.
Collapse
|
13
|
Schorr F, Essig MW. [Early detection of pancreatic cancer - The role of endoscopic and transabdominal ultrasound]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2021; 59:1083-1090. [PMID: 34243212 DOI: 10.1055/a-1515-3123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic neoplasms are less common tumors and have a poor prognosis when advanced. Early diagnosis would be beneficial for survival, but screening of the whole population cannot be justified with a satisfying benefit-effort correlation. Subgroups of patients with a higher than average risk are those with germ-like mutations, familial cancers risks, and mucinous cystadenomas that would benefit from surveillance programs. Other risk groups, like patients with pancreatitis, new onset diabetes, and heavy smokers, should be considered as well. Transabdominal ultrasonography is of great advantage as a first-line imaging method because of its easy access. The accuracy for adenocarcinoma diagnosis is nearly 90% while using CEUS. Endosonography is of extraordinary importance in the diagnostic approach of pancreatic tumors because of high sensitivity and specificity while using advanced imaging techniques like CEUS, elastography, and fine needle biopsy. Screening by means of EUS is also possible in high-risk situations, and a favourable cost-benefit ratio must be shown by future data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friedrich Schorr
- Gastroenterologie - Division Stadtspital/Landspitäler, Insel Gruppe AG, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Manfred Walter Essig
- Gastroenterologie - Division Stadtspital/Landspitäler, Insel Gruppe AG, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tepox-Padrón A, Bernal-Mendez RA, Duarte-Medrano G, Romano-Munive AF, Mairena-Valle M, Ramírez-Luna MÁ, Marroquin-Reyes JD, Uscanga L, Chan C, Domínguez-Rosado I, Hernandez-Calleros J, Pelaez-Luna M, Tellez-Avila F. Utility of endoscopic ultrasound in idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021; 8:bmjgast-2020-000538. [PMID: 33402380 PMCID: PMC7786795 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis (IARP) is defined as at least two episodes of acute pancreatitis with the complete or near-complete resolution of symptoms and signs of pancreatitis between episodes, without an identified cause. There is a paucity of information about the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in IARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Tepox-Padrón
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico, Mexico
| | - Rafael Ambrosio Bernal-Mendez
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico, Mexico
| | - Gilberto Duarte-Medrano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico, Mexico
| | - Adriana Fabiola Romano-Munive
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico, Mexico
| | - Milton Mairena-Valle
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico, Mexico
| | - Miguel Ángel Ramírez-Luna
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico, Mexico
| | - Jose Daniel Marroquin-Reyes
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico, Mexico
| | - Luis Uscanga
- Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Tlalpan, Mexico
| | - Carlos Chan
- Surgery Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico, Mexico
| | - Ismael Domínguez-Rosado
- Surgery Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico, Mexico
| | - Jorge Hernandez-Calleros
- Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Tlalpan, Mexico
| | - Mario Pelaez-Luna
- Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Tlalpan, Mexico
| | - Felix Tellez-Avila
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Affiliation(s)
- Babu P Mohan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|