1
|
Thiruvengadam NR, Saumoy M, Schaubel DE, Cotton PB, Elmunzer BJ, Freeman ML, Varadarajulu S, Kochman ML, Coté GA. Rise in First-Time ERCP For Benign Indications >1 Year After Cholecystectomy Is Associated With Worse Outcomes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S1542-3565(24)00309-4. [PMID: 38599308 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Greater availability of less invasive biliary imaging to rule out choledocholithiasis should reduce the need for diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients who have a remote history of cholecystectomy. The primary aims were to determine the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of individuals who undergo first-time ERCP >1 year after cholecystectomy (late-ERCP). METHODS Data from a commercial insurance claim database (Optum Clinformatics) identified 583,712 adults who underwent cholecystectomy, 4274 of whom underwent late-ERCP, defined as first-time ERCP for nonmalignant indications >1 year after cholecystectomy. Outcomes were exposure and temporal trends in late-ERCP, biliary imaging utilization, and post-ERCP outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine patient characteristics associated with undergoing late-ERCP. RESULTS Despite a temporal increase in the use of noninvasive biliary imaging (35.9% in 2004 to 65.6% in 2021; P < .001), the rate of late-ERCP increased 8-fold (0.5-4.2/1000 person-years from 2005 to 2021; P < .001). Although only 44% of patients who underwent late-ERCP had gallstone removal, there were high rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis (7.1%), hospitalization (13.1%), and new chronic opioid use (9.7%). Factors associated with late-ERCP included concomitant disorder of gut-brain interaction (odds ratio [OR], 6.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.88-6.91) and metabolic dysfunction steatotic liver disease (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.79-3.55) along with use of anxiolytic (OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 3.19-3.58), antispasmodic (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.53-1.72), and chronic opioids (OR, 6.24; 95% CI, 5.79-6.52). CONCLUSIONS The rate of late-ERCP postcholecystectomy is increasing significantly, particularly in patients with comorbidities associated with disorder of gut-brain interaction and mimickers of choledocholithiasis. Late-ERCPs are associated with disproportionately higher rates of adverse events, including initiation of chronic opioid use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil R Thiruvengadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California; Center for Endoscopic Innovation, Research, and Training, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Monica Saumoy
- Center for Digestive Health, Penn Medicine Princeton Medical Center, Plainsboro, New Jersey
| | - Douglas E Schaubel
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter B Cotton
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Martin L Freeman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Michael L Kochman
- Center for Endoscopic Innovation, Research, and Training, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gregory A Coté
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gopakumar H, Puli SR. Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Through-the-Needle Biopsy in Pancreatic Cystic Lesions. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024; 55:15-25. [PMID: 37341913 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-023-00949-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle biopsy (EUS-TTNB) has been used over the past few years to increase diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). However, many concerns remain regarding its widespread use. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to pool the data from high-quality studies to evaluate the utility of EUS-TTNB in diagnosing PCLs. METHODS Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) from January 2010 through October 2022 were searched for publications addressing the diagnostic performance of EUS-TTNB in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions. Pooled proportions were calculated using fixed (inverse variance) and random-effects (DerSimonian-Laird) models. RESULTS The initial search identified 635 studies, of which 35 relevant articles were reviewed. We extracted data from 11 studies that met the inclusion criterion, comprising a total of 575 patients. Mean patient age was 62.25 years ± 6.12 with females constituting 61.39% of the study population. Pooled sensitivity of EUS-TTNB in differentiating a PCL as neoplastic or non-neoplastic was 76.60% (95% CI = 72.60-80. 30). For the same indication, EUS TTNB had a pooled specificity of 98.90% (95% CI = 93.80-100.00). The positive likelihood ratio was 10.28 (95% CI = 4.77-22.15), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.26 (95% CI = 0.22-0.31). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio for EUS-TTNB in diagnosing PCLs as malignant/pre-malignant vs. non-malignant was 41.34 (95% CI = 17.42-98.08). Pooled adverse event rates were 3.04% (95% CI = 1.83-4.54) for pancreatitis, 4.02% (95% CI = 2.61-5.72) for intra-cystic bleeding, 0.94% (95% CI = 0.33-1.86) for fever, and 1.73% (95% CI = 0.85-2.91) for other minor events. CONCLUSIONS EUS-TTNB has good sensitivity with excellent specificity in accurately classifying PCLs as neoplastic or non-neoplastic. Adding EUS-TTNB to EUS-FNA increases the accuracy of EUS-guided approach in diagnosing PCLs. However, it could significantly increase the risk of post-procedural pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harishankar Gopakumar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, 530 NE Glen Oak Ave, Peoria, IL, USA.
| | - Srinivas R Puli
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, 530 NE Glen Oak Ave, Peoria, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elmunzer BJ, Foster LD, Serrano J, Coté GA, Edmundowicz SA, Wani S, Shah R, Bang JY, Varadarajulu S, Singh VK, Khashab M, Kwon RS, Scheiman JM, Willingham FF, Keilin SA, Papachristou GI, Chak A, Slivka A, Mullady D, Kushnir V, Buxbaum J, Keswani R, Gardner TB, Forbes N, Rastogi A, Ross A, Law J, Yachimski P, Chen YI, Barkun A, Smith ZL, Petersen B, Wang AY, Saltzman JR, Spitzer RL, Ordiah C, Spino C, Durkalski-Mauldin V. Indomethacin with or without prophylactic pancreatic stent placement to prevent pancreatitis after ERCP: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2024; 403:450-458. [PMID: 38219767 PMCID: PMC10872215 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02356-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of rectally administered indomethacin and placement of a prophylactic pancreatic stent is recommended to prevent pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in high-risk patients. Preliminary evidence suggests that the use of indomethacin might eliminate or substantially reduce the need for stent placement, a technically complex, costly, and potentially harmful intervention. METHODS In this randomised, non-inferiority trial conducted at 20 referral centres in the USA and Canada, patients (aged ≥18 years) at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive rectal indomethacin alone or the combination of indomethacin plus a prophylactic pancreatic stent. Patients, treating clinicians, and outcomes assessors were masked to study group assignment. The primary outcome was post-ERCP pancreatitis. To declare non-inferiority, the upper bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference in post-ERCP pancreatitis (indomethacin alone minus indomethacin plus stent) would have to be less than 5% (non-inferiority margin) in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02476279), and is complete. FINDINGS Between Sept 17, 2015, and Jan 25, 2023, a total of 1950 patients were randomly assigned. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 145 (14·9%) of 975 patients in the indomethacin alone group and in 110 (11·3%) of 975 in the indomethacin plus stent group (risk difference 3·6%; 95% CI 0·6-6·6; p=0·18 for non-inferiority). A post-hoc intention-to-treat analysis of the risk difference between groups showed that indomethacin alone was inferior to the combination of indomethacin plus prophylactic stent (p=0·011). The relative benefit of stent placement was generally consistent across study subgroups but appeared more prominent among patients at highest risk for pancreatitis. Safety outcomes (serious adverse events, intensive care unit admission, and hospital length of stay) did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION For preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients, a strategy of indomethacin alone was not as effective as a strategy of indomethacin plus prophylactic pancreatic stent placement. These results support prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in addition to rectal indomethacin administration in high-risk patients, in accordance with clinical practice guidelines. FUNDING US National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Lydia D Foster
- Data Coordination Unit, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jose Serrano
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gregory A Coté
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Steven A Edmundowicz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Raj Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ji Young Bang
- Orlando Health Digestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Shyam Varadarajulu
- Orlando Health Digestive Health Institute, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Vikesh K Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mouen Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Richard S Kwon
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - James M Scheiman
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Field F Willingham
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Steven A Keilin
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Georgios I Papachristou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amitabh Chak
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Adam Slivka
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Daniel Mullady
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Vladimir Kushnir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - James Buxbaum
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rajesh Keswani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Timothy B Gardner
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Nauzer Forbes
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Andrew Ross
- Division of Gastroenterology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joanna Law
- Division of Gastroenterology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Patrick Yachimski
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yen-I Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alan Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Zachary L Smith
- Division of Gastroenterology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Bret Petersen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrew Y Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - John R Saltzman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rebecca L Spitzer
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Collins Ordiah
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Cathie Spino
- Department of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Valerie Durkalski-Mauldin
- Data Coordination Unit, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kaimakliotis PI, Kochman ML. Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement to prevent pancreatitis after ERCP. Lancet 2024; 403:411-413. [PMID: 38219770 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02719-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Pavlos I Kaimakliotis
- Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Michael L Kochman
- Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Altunpak B, Aydin H, Cebi F, Seyit H, Kones O, Akarsu C, Kabuli H, Gumusoglu A, Karabulut M. Post-ERCP Pancreatitis Risk Factors: Is Post-Sphincterotomy Bleeding Another Risk Factor? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2024; 34:69-73. [PMID: 38063573 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advancements in technology and expertise, ERCP carries risks of significant complications, such as pancreatitis, bleeding, and perforation. Post-ERCP pancreatitis is the most common and important complication following ERCP. In our study, we aimed to examine the relationship between patient and procedure-related parameters and the development of pancreatitis. METHODS Four hundred patients who underwent ERCP between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020, at the General Surgery Clinic of the Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Health Application and Research Center of the University of Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine were retrospectively evaluated. Patient and procedure-related factors were analyzed statistically through univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Age, urgent indication, ERCP history, cholangitis, precut sphincterotomy, common bile duct diameter, pancreatic cannulation, pancreatic stent, and bleeding were statistically significant risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis (+). In multivariate analysis, the effects of urgent indication, ERCP history, cholangitis, precut sphincterotomy, common bile duct diameter, and pancreatic cannulation on post-ERCP pancreatitis were statistically significant risk factors ( P <0.05). DISCUSSION This study demonstrates that emergency indication, ERCP history, cholangitis, precut sphincterotomy, and pancreatic cannulation are significant risk factors for the development of post- ERCP pancreatitis. One notable contribution of our study to the existing literature is the unique analysis of post-sphincterotomy bleeding as an independent factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Altunpak
- Department of General Surgery, Gaziantep Nizip State Hospital, Gaziantep
| | - Husnu Aydin
- Department of General Surgery, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fevzi Cebi
- Department of General Surgery, Trabzon of State Hospital, Trabzon
| | - Hakan Seyit
- Department of General Surgery, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Osman Kones
- Department of General Surgery, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cevher Akarsu
- Department of General Surgery, Arel University Memorial Hizmet Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hamit Kabuli
- Department of General Surgery, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alpen Gumusoglu
- Department of General Surgery, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Karabulut
- Department of General Surgery, Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chung MJ, Park SW, Lee KJ, Park DH, Koh DH, Lee J, Lee HS, Park JY, Bang S, Min S, Park JH, Kim SJ, Park CH. Clinical impact of pancreatic steatosis measured by CT on the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter prospective trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:214-223.e4. [PMID: 37598866 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Pancreatic steatosis (PS) may be a risk factor for acute pancreatitis. Whether it is also a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) has not been evaluated. This study aimed to determine the impact of PS on PEP development. METHODS This multicenter prospective trial enrolled 786 consecutive patients who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT and subsequent first-time ERCP. PS was evaluated based on pancreatic attenuation on unenhanced CT images. The risk of PS for the development of PEP was evaluated using a logistic regression model. RESULTS Of 527 patients included in the study, 157 (29.8%) had PS and 370 (70.2%) did not. At 24 hours after ERCP, there was a significant difference in the PEP identified in 22 patients (14.0%) in the PS group and 23 patients (6.2%) in the "no PS" (NPS) group (P = .017). Diabetes and hypertension were more common in the PS group than in the NPS group; no differences in dyslipidemia were found. Patients with PS had a higher risk for the development of PEP than those with NPS (odds ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-4.03). No other variables were identified as risk factors for PEP. CONCLUSIONS PS is a significant risk factor for PEP for which preventive measures should be considered. Standardized measurement protocols to assess PS by CT are needed. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0006068.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moon Jae Chung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Se Woo Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyong Joo Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Da Hae Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hee Koh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Seung Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Youp Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungmin Bang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seonjeong Min
- Department of Radiology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hoon Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, CHA University, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - So Jeong Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan Hyuk Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dahiya DS, Pinnam BSM, Chandan S, Gangwani MK, Ali H, Gopakumar H, Aziz M, Bapaye J, Al-Haddad M, Sharma NR. Clinical outcomes and predictors for 30-day readmissions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the United States. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:141-148. [PMID: 37743640 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES We aimed to assess 30-day readmissions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the United States. METHODS The National Readmission Database was utilized from 2016 to 2020 to identify 30-day readmissions of ERCP. Hospitalization characteristics and outcomes were compared between index hospitalizations and readmissions. Predictors of 30-day readmission and mortality were also identified. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2020, 885 416 index hospitalizations underwent ERCP. Of these, 88 380 (10.15%) were readmitted within 30 days. Compared to index hospitalizations, 30-day readmissions had higher mean age (63.76 vs 60.8 years, P < 0.001) and proportion of patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≥3 (48.26% vs 29.91%, P < 0.001). Sepsis was the most common readmission diagnosis. Increasing age, male gender, higher CCI scores, admissions at large metropolitan teaching hospitals, cholecystectomy on index hospitalization, biliary stenting, increasing length of stay (LOS) at index admission, post-ERCP pancreatitis, post-ERCP hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal tract perforation were independent predictors of 30-day readmissions. Furthermore, 30-day readmissions had higher odds of inpatient mortality (4.42% vs 1.66%, aOR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.79-2.01, P < 0.001) compared to index hospitalizations. However, we noted a shorter LOS (5.78 vs 6.22 days, mean difference 1.2, 95% CI: 1.12-1.28, P < 0.001) and lower total hospital charge ($71 076 vs $93 418, mean difference $31 452, 95% CI: 29 835-33 069, P < 0.001) for 30-day readmissions compared to index hospitalizations. Increasing age, higher CCI scores, increasing LOS, biliary stenting, and post-ERCP hemorrhage were independent predictors of inpatient mortality for 30-day readmissions. CONCLUSION After index ERCP, the 30-day remission rate was 10.15%. Compared to index hospitalizations, 30-day readmissions had higher odds of inpatient mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dushyant Singh Dahiya
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Motility, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Bhanu Siva Mohan Pinnam
- Department of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHI Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | | | - Hassam Ali
- Department of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University/Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Harishankar Gopakumar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, Illinois, USA
| | - Muhammad Aziz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Jay Bapaye
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Mohammad Al-Haddad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Neil R Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Interventional Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE) Division, GI Oncology Tumor Site Team, Parkview Cancer Institute, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Salama HZ, Alnajjar YA, Owais TA, Jobran AWM, Safi R, Bahar M, Al-Ashhab H. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography utilisation and outcomes in the first advanced endoscopy centre in Palestine at Al-Ahli Hospital: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e077806. [PMID: 38154896 PMCID: PMC10759078 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the utilisation and outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures, success rates, incidence and risk factors for procedural-related complications in a single centre-based study. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING First advanced tertiary endoscopy centre in Palestine. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1909 procedures on 1303 patients were included in the analysis: females were 57.9% of the cases (n=755), 1225 patients (94%) were from West Bank and Jerusalem and 78 (6%) were from Gaza Strip. All patients who underwent ERCP throughout the period from December 2017 to September 2022 were selected to participate in the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes of interest in our analysis were success rates, procedural outcomes and post- procedural complications including pancreatitis, bleeding and others. Two multivariate logistic regression models were performed to calculate the risk of post-ERCP complications and post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in patients with certain risk factors like demographic factors, procedural techniques' variation, pancreatic duct manipulations and others. We also discussed the management of the failed procedures. RESULTS The overall complication rate was 5%, including PEP (n=43, 2.3%), infection/cholangitis (n=20, 1%), bleeding (n=9, 0.5%) and perforation (n=7, 0.4%). The mortality rate was 0.6% (n=11). Risk factors for adverse events included pancreatic duct cannulation and PEP (p<0.001, OR=3.64). Additionally, younger patients (≤45) were found to carry a higher risk for PEP when compared with older patients (≥65) (p=0.023, OR=2.84). In comparison with sphincterotomy, the double-wire technique was associated with a higher risk of complications (p=0.033, OR=2.29). CONCLUSIONS We summarised the utilisation and outcomes of ERCP among the Palestinian population in the first advanced centre in Palestine. Cannulation success rates are similar to the established standards and are acceptable compared with other centres worldwide. Perioperative complication rates of ERCP remain infrequent, and death is quite unusual and thus considered a safe procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tarek A Owais
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt
| | | | - Ruaa Safi
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine
| | - Mohammad Bahar
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine
- Internal Medicine Department, Al-Ahli Hospital, Hebron, Palestine
| | - Hazem Al-Ashhab
- Chief of Internal Medicine Department, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine
- Chief of Gastroenterology Department, Al Ahli Hospital, Hebron, Palestine
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Teles de Campos S, Papaefthymiou A, Florou T, Facciorusso A, Arvanitakis M, Devière J, Gkolfakis P. Impact of center and endoscopist ERCP volume on ERCP outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:306-315.e14. [PMID: 37201726 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopist experience and center volume might be associated with ERCP outcomes, as in other fields of endoscopy and in surgery. An effort to assess this relationship is important to improve practice. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate these comparative data and to assess the impact of endoscopist and center volume on ERCP procedure outcomes. METHODS We performed a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus through March 2022. Volume classification included high- and low-volume (HV and LV) endoscopists and centers. The primary outcome was the impact of endoscopist and center volume on ERCP success. Secondary outcomes were the overall adverse event (AE) rate and the specific AE rate. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Data synthesis was obtained by direct meta-analyses using a random-effects model; results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Of 6833 relevant publications, 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. Procedure success was higher among HV endoscopists (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.59-2.06; I2 = 57%) and in HV centers (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22-2.57; I2 = 67%). The overall AE rate was lower for procedures performed by HV endoscopists (OR, .71; 95% CI, .61-.82; I2 = 38%) and in HV centers (OR, .70; 95% CI, .51-.97; I2 = 92%). Bleeding was less frequent in procedures performed by HV endoscopists (OR, .67; 95% CI, .48-.95; I2 = 37%) but did not differ based on center volume (OR, .68; 95% CI, .24-1.90; I2 = 89%). No statistical differences were detected concerning pancreatitis, cholangitis, and perforation rates. CONCLUSIONS HV endoscopists and centers provide higher ERCP success rates with fewer overall AEs, especially bleeding, compared with respective LV comparators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Teles de Campos
- Gastroenterology Department, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Apostolis Papaefthymiou
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Larissa, Thessaly, Greece
| | - Theodosia Florou
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Larissa, Thessaly, Greece
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jacques Devière
- Gastroenterology Department, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; Université Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium; Konstantopoulio-Patision General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rivas A, Pherwani S, Mohamed R, Smith ZL, Elmunzer BJ, Forbes N. ERCP-related adverse events: incidence, mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and management. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:1101-1116. [PMID: 37899490 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2277776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a commonly performed procedure for pancreaticobiliary disease. While ERCP is highly effective, it is also associated with the highest adverse event (AE) rates of all commonly performed endoscopic procedures. Thus, it is critical that endoscopists and caregivers of patients undergoing ERCP have clear understandings of ERCP-related AEs. AREAS COVERED This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the available evidence on ERCP-related AEs. For the purposes of this review, we subdivide the presentation of each ERCP-related AE according to the following clinically relevant domains: definitions and incidence, proposed mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and recognition and management. The evidence informing this review was derived in part from a search of the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, performed on 1 May 20231 May 2023. EXPERT OPINION Knowledge of ERCP-related AEs is critical not only given potential improvements in peri-procedural quality and related care that can ensue but also given the importance of reviewing these considerations with patients during informed consent. The ERCP community and researchers should aim to apply standardized definitions of AEs. Evidence-based knowledge of ERCP risk factors should inform patient care decisions during training and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica Rivas
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Simran Pherwani
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Rachid Mohamed
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zachary L Smith
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Nauzer Forbes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Akshintala VS, Kanthasamy K, Bhullar FA, Sperna Weiland CJ, Kamal A, Kochar B, Gurakar M, Ngamruengphong S, Kumbhari V, Brewer-Gutierrez OI, Kalloo AN, Khashab MA, van Geenen EJM, Singh VK. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 145 randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:1-6.e12. [PMID: 37004815 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) largely remain unknown with changing trends in ERCP use, indication, and techniques. We sought to determine the incidence, severity, and mortality of PEP in consecutive and high-risk patients based on a systemic review and meta-analysis of patients in placebo and no-stent arms of randomized control trials (RCTs). METHODS The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from the inception of each database to June 2022 to identify full-text RCTs evaluating PEP prophylaxes. The incidence, severity, and mortality of PEP from the placebo or no-stent arms of RCTs were recorded for consecutive and high-risk patients. A random-effects meta-analysis for a proportions model was used to calculate PEP incidence, severity, and mortality. RESULTS One hundred forty-five RCTs were found with 19,038 patients in the placebo or no-stent arms. The overall cumulative incidence of PEP was 10.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.3-11.3), predominantly among the academic centers conducting such RCTs. The cumulative incidences of severe PEP and mortality were .5% (95% CI, .3-.7) and .2% (95% CI, .08-.3), respectively, across 91 RCTs with 14,441 patients. The cumulative incidences of PEP and severe PEP were 14.1% (95% CI, 11.5-17.2) and .8% (95% CI, .4-1.6), respectively, with a mortality rate of .2% (95% CI, 0-.3) across 35 RCTs with 3733 patients at high risk of PEP. The overall trend for the incidence of PEP among patients randomized to placebo or no-stent arms of RCTs has remained unchanged from 1977 to 2022 (P = .48). CONCLUSIONS The overall incidence of PEP is 10.2% but is 14.1% among high-risk patients based on this systematic review of placebo or no-stent arms of 145 RCTs; this rate has not changed between 1977 and 2022. Severe PEP and mortality from PEP are relatively uncommon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venkata S Akshintala
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kavin Kanthasamy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Furqan A Bhullar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Ayesha Kamal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Bharati Kochar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Merve Gurakar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Anthony N Kalloo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Erwin-Jan M van Geenen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Vikesh K Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kouanda A, Bayudan A, Hussain A, Avila P, Kamal F, Hasan MK, Dai SC, Munroe C, Thiruvengadam N, Arain MA. Current state of biliary cannulation techniques during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): International survey study. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E588-E598. [PMID: 37564727 PMCID: PMC10410689 DOI: 10.1055/a-2085-4565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopist techniques affect biliary cannulation success and the risk of adverse events during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This survey study aims to understand the current practice of biliary cannulation techniques among endoscopists. Methods Practicing endoscopists were sent an anonymous 28-question electronic survey on biliary cannulation techniques and intraprocedural pancreatitis prophylactic strategies. Results The survey was completed by 692 endoscopists (6.2% females). A wire-guided cannulation technique (WGT) was the preferred initial biliary cannulation approach (95%). The preferred secondary approaches were a double-wire (DWT) (65.8%), precut needle-knife technique (NKT) (25.7%), transpancreatic sphincterotomy (5.9%) or other (2.6%). Overall, 18.1% of respondents were not comfortable with NKTs. In the setting of pancreatic duct (PD) access, 81.9% and 97% reported a threshold of three or more wire passes or contrast injections into the PD, respectively, before changing strategy, 34% reported placement of a prophylactic PD stent <50% of the time and 12.1% reported removal of the PD stent at the end of the procedure. Advanced endoscopy fellowship (AEF) training and high volume (>200 ERCPs per year) were associated with comfort with precut NKTs and likelihood of prophylactic PD stent ( P <0.001 for both). Conclusions A WGT technique followed by the DWT and NKT were the preferred biliary cannulation techniques; however, almost one-fifth of respondents were not comfortable with the NKT. There was considerable variability in secondary cannulation approaches, time spent attempting biliary cannulation and prophylactic PD stent placement, factors known to be associated with cannulation success and adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Kouanda
- Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco Medical Center at Parnassus, San Francisco, United States
| | - Alexis Bayudan
- Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco Medical Center at Parnassus, San Francisco, United States
| | - Azhar Hussain
- Medicine, Ameer-ud-Din Medical College of PGMI, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Patrick Avila
- Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco Medical Center at Parnassus, San Francisco, United States
| | - Faisal Kamal
- Gastroenterology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, United States
| | - Muhammad Khalid Hasan
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Florida Hospital Orlando, Orlando, United States
| | - Sun-Chuan Dai
- Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco Medical Center at Parnassus, San Francisco, United States
| | - Craig Munroe
- Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco Medical Center at Parnassus, San Francisco, United States
| | | | - Mustafa A Arain
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Palomera-Tejeda E, Shah MP, Attar BM, Shah H, Sharma B, Oleas R, Kotwal V, Gandhi S, Mutneja HR. Pharmacological and Endoscopic Interventions for Prophylaxis of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology Res 2023; 16:149-156. [PMID: 37351082 PMCID: PMC10284647 DOI: 10.14740/gr1620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) represents the most common serious complication after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and pancreatic duct stenting (PDS) are the prophylactic interventions with more evidence and efficacy; however, PEP still represents a significant source of morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Chronic statin use has been proposed as a prophylactic method that could be cheap and relatively safe. However, the evidence is conflicting. We aimed to evaluate the impact of endoscopic and pharmacological interventions including chronic statin and aspirin use, on the development of PEP. Methods A retrospective cohort study evaluated consecutive patients undergoing ERCP at John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County in Chicago from January 2015 to March 2018. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression. Results A total of 681 ERCPs were included in the study. Twelve (1.76%) developed PEP. Univariate, multivariate, and subgroup analyses did not show any association between chronic statin or aspirin use and PEP. PDS and rectal indomethacin were protective in patients undergoing pancreatic duct injection. Pancreatic duct injection, female sex, and younger age were associated with a higher risk. History of papillotomy was associated with lower risk only in the univariate analysis (all P values < 0.05). Conclusion Chronic use of statins and aspirin appears to add no additional benefit to prevent ERCP pancreatitis. Rectal NSAIDs, and PDS after appropriate patient selection continue to be the main prophylactic measures. The lower incidence at our center compared with the reported data can be explained by the high rates of rectal indomethacin and PDS, the use of noninvasive diagnostic modalities for patient selection, and the expertise of the endoscopists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mihir Prakash Shah
- Department of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bashar M. Attar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hassam Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bharosa Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roberto Oleas
- Department of Internal Medicine, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Vikram Kotwal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Seema Gandhi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hemant Raj Mutneja
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ashat M, Kandula S, Cote GA, Gromski MA, Fogel EL, Sherman S, Lehman GA, Watkins JL, Bick BL, Easler JJ. Utilization pattern of prophylactic measures for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a National Survey Study. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:1059-1066.e3. [PMID: 36738796 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.01.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most frequent adverse event of ERCP. Various prophylactic measures are endorsed by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy to both lower the incidence of PEP and to decrease its severity. The extent to which these interventions are practiced throughout the United States is unclear. The aim of this study was to describe the utilization pattern of various PEP measures and determine factors that affect utilization of these measures. METHODS A 27-question electronic survey was distributed using a cloud-based program (Qualtrics). The questions assessed ERCP training, practice setting, experience, practice patterns, and perceptions for PEP prophylaxis interventions. Endoscopists with practices based in the United States listed in the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy member directory received a survey invitation via e-mail. The invitation outlined the study and contained a link with instructions to complete the voluntary survey if they had an active ERCP practice. Data were de-identified for the purposes of analysis. RESULTS Of survey respondents (N = 319), 46% reported therapeutic endoscopy fellowship training and 37% practiced in teaching programs. Annualized ERCP volume of >100 cases per year were reported by 47%, with pancreatic ERCP comprising ≤5% of procedure volume reported by the majority of respondents (61%). The majority of respondents used prophylactic pancreatic stent (PPS), and 54% reported frequent use during high-risk ERCP. The most common indications for PPS were difficult cannulation, to assist biliary access, and multiple pancreatic duct injections. Most respondents reported frequent use of indomethacin (89%). Of physicians who did not use PPS, use of indomethacin was the most common reason (80%). Variables associated with frequent use of PPS were ERCP fellowship training (P ≤ .001), practice at a teaching program (P ≤ .001), <10 years in practice (P = .005), higher procedure volume (P ≤ .001), and higher proportion of pancreatic cases (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS Physicians with higher annual ERCP volume, who teach at hospital-based ERCP practices, and who regularly perform pancreatic ERCP are more likely to use PPS. Therapeutic ERCP fellowship training and recent entry into practice were also associated with PPS utilization. Indomethacin use seems to be more frequent than PPS. Our findings suggest that indomethacin is supplanting PPS as the preferred method of PEP prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munish Ashat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
| | - Sailesh Kandula
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Gregory A Cote
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Mark A Gromski
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Evan L Fogel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Stuart Sherman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Glen A Lehman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - James L Watkins
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Benjamin L Bick
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rockford Gastroenterology Associates, Rockford, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Easler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gordon SR. Prevention of post-endscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Do we practice what we preach? Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:1067-1069. [PMID: 37208040 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart R Gordon
- Section of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Deshmukh A, Desai PM, Chrusciel T, Nwankwo E, Tripathi R, Cheesman AR. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a 12-year analysis of a national database. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:137. [PMID: 37204502 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04427-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite inflammatory bowel disease's (IBD) association with hepatobiliary disorders and the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for both diagnostic and therapeutic evaluation of these diseases, it remains a poorly studied area within the literature. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of IBD on the occurrence of adverse events (AE) pertaining to ERCP. METHODS This project utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, the largest inpatient database in the USA. All patients 18 years or older with and without IBD undergoing ERCP were identified from 2008 to 2019. Post-ERCP AEs were analyzed using multivariate logistic or linear regression controlling for age, race, and existing comorbidities using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). RESULTS There was no difference in post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) or mortality. IBD patients were also found to have a lower risk of bleeding and decreased length of stay (LOS) despite adjustment for comorbidities. They also underwent less sphincterotomies when compared to the non-IBD cohort. Subgroup analysis between ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) did not find any significant differences in outcomes. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date evaluating ERCP outcomes in IBD patients. After adjustment of co-variates, there was no difference in the occurrence of PEP, infections, and perforation. IBD patients were less likely to experience post-ERCP bleeding and mortality and had shorter LOS which may be due to the decreased frequency of sphincterotomy in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameya Deshmukh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University - SOM, 1201 South Grand Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63104, USA.
| | - Parth M Desai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reading Hospital - Tower Health, PA, Reading, USA
| | - Timothy Chrusciel
- Advanced Health Data Research Institute (AHEAD), Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eugene Nwankwo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University - SOM, 1201 South Grand Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63104, USA
| | - Rohan Tripathi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University - SOM, 1201 South Grand Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63104, USA
| | - Antonio R Cheesman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Louis University - SOM, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kosti A, Borakati A, Varma A, Gupta A, Mustafa A, Hakeem A, Quddus A, Sahl AB, Beniwal A, Adesuyi A, Krzak AM, Brooks A, Frampton A, Gadhvi A, Talbot A, Elnogoomi A, Mahgoub A, Naqvi A, Pervez A, Bodla AS, Taha A, Tawfik A, Prabhu A, Puri A, Belgaumkar A, Gupta A, McCrorie A, Findlay A, Healey A, De Prendergast A, Farrugia A, Dosis A, Adiamah A, Sallam A, Wong A, Bradley A, Martin A, Collins A, Awan A, Bond A, Koh A, Kourdouli A, Patel AG, Dhannoon A, Khalil A, Banerjee A, Khan A, Elserafy A, Alamassi A, Owen A, Benjafield A, Zuccarrelli A, Luhmann A, Jones A, Kennedy-Dalby A, Smith AM, Kaul A, Kumar A, White A, Baker A, Minicozzi A, Bardoli A, Golpe AL, Manzelli A, Sivakumar A, Saha A, Shajpal A, Lango A, Cotton A, Nair A, Brown A, Menon A, Tandon A, Afza A, Hassan A, Shamali A, Khalid A, Regan A, Piramanayagam B, Oyewole B, Ibrahim B, Murphy B, Clayton B, Jenkins B, Kumar B, Rybinski B, Khor BY, Davidson BR, Lees B, Blacklock C, Johnstone C, Salinas CH, Boven C, Wolstenholme C, Chin C, Gilmore C, Sharp C, Walker C, Harris C, Khanna C, Ferguson C, Kyriakides C, Bee C, Currow C, Parmar C, Collins C, Halloran C, Smart CJ, Neophytou C, Delaney C, Anele C, Heugh C, Choh CTP, Kenington C, Wyatt C, Borg CM, Mole D, Arumugam D, Gunia D, Porter D, Berry D, Griffith D, Hou D, Longbotham D, Mitton D, Strachan D, Di Mauro D, Worku D, Heaphy D, Dunne D, Yeung D, Arambepola D, Leswas DA, Pournaras DJ, Damaskos D, Saleh D, Osilli D, Pearman D, Whitelaw D, Haq EU, Mack E, Spurring E, Jamieson E, Lenzi E, Gemmill E, Gammeri E, Bota E, Britton E, Farrow E, Lloyd E, Moran E, Itobi E, Craig E, Tanaka E, Chohda E, Muhammad FU, Youssef F, Roslan F, Amir F, Froghi F, Di Franco F, Abbadessa F, DiMaggio F, Gurung G, Faulkner G, Choa G, Kerans G, Davis GN, Galanopoulos G, Karagiannidis G, McCabe G, Mohammadi-Zaniani G, Nawaz G, Van Boxel G, Bond-Smith G, Tierney GM, Muthukumarasamy G, Grey G, Wong G, Finch G, Khan H, Bourne H, Javanmard-Emamghissi H, Murray H, Rottenburg H, Wright H, Khalil H, Spiers HVM, Bashiti H, Shanti H, Ebied H, Ng HJ, Hamid HKS, Kim H, Wilson I, Rajendran I, Gerogiannis I, Patel I, El-Abbassy I, Burridge I, Caldwll J, Jackman J, Clark J, Duncan J, Milburn J, O’Kelly J, Olivier J, Rink J, Royle J, Rai J, Latif J, Ahmad J, Maliyil J, Carr J, Coles J, McGarry J, Apollos J, Lim J, Gray J, Thomas J, Bennett J, Findlay J, Spearman J, Young J, Lund JN, Meilak J, Alfred J, Welsh J, Chan JH, Martin J, Patel K, Ko KYK, Isand K, Razi K, Sarathy K, Powezka K, Foster K, Peleki K, Bevan K, Fox K, Edwards K, Larsen K, Spellar K, Oh KE, Kong K, Brown K, Roberts KJ, Seymour K, Beatson K, Etherson K, Willis K, Mann K, Nizami K, Rajput K, Lavery L, Sawdon L, Nip L, Al-Hamed L, Fagan L, Watton L, Saint-Grant AL, Convie L, Girard LP, Huppler L, Marsh L, Seretny L, Newton L, Buksh M, Sallam M, Mathew M, Prasanth MN, Nayar M, Wijeyaratne M, Hollyman M, Ransome M, Popa M, Galea M, Taylor M, Gismondi M, Michel M, Wadley M, Al-Azzawi M, Claxton M, Kuzman M, Bonomaully M, Newman M, Bhandari M, Courtney M, Jones M, Rarity M, Wilson M, Ebraheem M, Elnaghi M, Mohamed MSN, Al-Hijaji M, Al-Rashedy M, Qayum MK, Zourob M, Gaber M, Rao M, Islam MA, Rashid MU, Zafar M, Naqvi M, Ahmad MN, Telfah M, Merali N, Hanbali N, Gulnaz N, Kumar N, Husain N, Angamuthu N, Murali N, Kirmani N, Assaf N, Doshi N, Shah NS, Basra N, Menezes N, Dai N, Schuijtvlot N, Kansal N, Chidumije N, Yassin N, Babalola O, Oyende O, Williams O, Pawlik O, O'Connor O, Jalil OA, Ryska O, Vaz O, Sarmah P, Jayawardena P, Patel P, Hart P, Cromwell P, Manby P, Marriott P, Needham P, Ghaneh P, Rao PKD, Eves P, Coe PO, May-Miller P, Szatmary P, Ireland P, Seta P, Ravi P, Janardhanan P, Patil P, Mistry P, Heer P, Patel P, Nunes Q, Ain Q, Clifford R, Brindle R, Lee RXN, Lim RQH, Rahman R, Kumar RM, Lunevicius R, Mukherjee R, Lahiri R, Behmida R, Rajebhosale R, Levy R, Chhabra R, Oliphant R, Freeman R, Jones RM, Elkalbash R, Brignall R, Bell R, Byrom R, Laing RW, Patel R, Buhain R, Clark R, Sutton R, Presa R, Lawther R, Patel R, Zakeri R, Mashar R, Wei R, Baron R, Tasleem S, Kadambot SS, Azam S, Wajed S, Ali S, Body S, Saeed S, Bandyopadhyay S, Mohamed S, Pandanaboyana S, Hassasing S, Dyer S, Small S, Seeralakandapalan S, Arumugam S, Chakravartty S, Ong SL, Ooi SZY, Nazir S, Zafar S, Shirazi S, Bharucha S, Majid S, Ahmed S, Rajamanickam SK, Albalkiny S, Ng S, Chowdhury S, Yahia S, Handa S, Fallis S, Fisher S, Jones S, Phillips S, Mitra S, Aroori S, Thanki S, Rozwadowski S, Tucker S, Conroy S, Barman S, Bhat S, McCallion S, Knight SR, Tezas S, van Laarhoven S, Cowie S, Rao S, Sellahewa S, Bhatti S, Kaistha S, Moug SJ, Argyropoulos S, Virupaksha S, Difford T, Shikh-Bahaei T, Saafan T, Lo T, Magro T, Gala T, Katbeh T, Athwal T, Lo T, Fraser T, Anyomih T, Chase TJG, Walker T, Ward T, Gallagher TK, Richardson T, Wiggins T, Ali U, Patnam V, Kanakala V, Beynon V, Hudson VE, Morrison-Jones V, Korwar V, Massella V, Parekh V, Ng V, Toh WH, Toh W, Hawkins W, Cambridge W, Harrison W, Tan YY, Aal YA, Malam Y, Toumi Z, Khaddar ZA, Bleything Z. PANC Study (Pancreatitis: A National Cohort Study): national cohort study examining the first 30 days from presentation of acute pancreatitis in the UK. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad008. [PMID: 37161673 PMCID: PMC10170253 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis is a common, yet complex, emergency surgical presentation. Multiple guidelines exist and management can vary significantly. The aim of this first UK, multicentre, prospective cohort study was to assess the variation in management of acute pancreatitis to guide resource planning and optimize treatment. METHODS All patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years presenting with acute pancreatitis, as per the Atlanta criteria, from March to April 2021 were eligible for inclusion and followed up for 30 days. Anonymized data were uploaded to a secure electronic database in line with local governance approvals. RESULTS A total of 113 hospitals contributed data on 2580 patients, with an equal sex distribution and a mean age of 57 years. The aetiology was gallstones in 50.6 per cent, with idiopathic the next most common (22.4 per cent). In addition to the 7.6 per cent with a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis, 20.1 per cent of patients had a previous episode of acute pancreatitis. One in 20 patients were classed as having severe pancreatitis, as per the Atlanta criteria. The overall mortality rate was 2.3 per cent at 30 days, but rose to one in three in the severe group. Predictors of death included male sex, increased age, and frailty; previous acute pancreatitis and gallstones as aetiologies were protective. Smoking status and body mass index did not affect death. CONCLUSION Most patients presenting with acute pancreatitis have a mild, self-limiting disease. Rates of patients with idiopathic pancreatitis are high. Recurrent attacks of pancreatitis are common, but are likely to have reduced risk of death on subsequent admissions.
Collapse
|
18
|
Temporal trend and factors associated with post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in children in the USA: a nationwide, retrospective cohort study. Eur J Pediatr 2023; 182:2273-2282. [PMID: 36872379 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-04902-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatitis is the most common adverse event following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Meanwhile, the national temporal trend of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in children remains to be reported. The purpose of this study is to investigate the temporal trend and factors associated with PEP in children. We conducted a nationwide study using data from the National Inpatient Sample database during 2008-2017 and included all patients aged ≤ 18 years who underwent ERCP. The primary outcomes were temporal trends and factors associated with PEP. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, total charges (TC), and total length of stay (LOS). A total of 45,268 hospitalized pediatric patients who underwent ERCP were analyzed; of whom, 2043 (4.5%) were diagnosed with PEP. The prevalence of PEP decreased from 5.0% in 2008 to 4.6% in 2017 (P = 0.0002). In multivariable logistic analysis, adjusted risk factors of PEP were hospitals located in the West (aOR 2.09, 95% CI 1.36-3.20; P < .0001), bile duct stent insertion (aOR 1.49, 95% CI, 1.08-2.05; P = 0.0040), and end-stage renal disease (aOR 8.05, 95% CI 1.66-39.16; P = 0.0098). Adjusted protective factors of PEP were increasing age (aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98; P = 0.0014) and hospitals located in the South (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.94; P < .0001). In-hospital mortality, TC, and LOS were higher in patients with PEP than those without PEP. CONCLUSION This study shows a decreasing national trend over time and identifies multiple protective and risk factors for pediatric PEP. Endoscopists can use the insights from this study to evaluate relevant factors before performing ERCP in children to prevent PEP and reduce the medical-care burden. WHAT IS KNOWN • Although ERCP has become indispensable procedure in children as they are in adults, education and training programs for ERCP in children are underdeveloped in many countries. • PEP is the most common and most serious adverse event following ERCP. Research on PEP in adults showed rising hospital admission and mortality rates associated with PEP in the USA. WHAT IS NEW • The national temporal trend of PEP among pediatric patients in the USA was decreasing from 2008 to 2017. • Older age was a protective factor for PEP in children, while end-stage renal disease and stent insertion into the bile duct were risk factors.
Collapse
|
19
|
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on post-ERCP pancreatitis prevention strategies: methodology and review of evidence. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:163-183.e40. [PMID: 36517309 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
20
|
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on post-ERCP pancreatitis prevention strategies: summary and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:153-162. [PMID: 36517310 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
21
|
Kang X, Guo X, Chen Z, Zhou Z, Luo H, Lu Y, Lou L, Guo X, Pan Y. The Incidence and Severity of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in Patients Receiving Standard Administration of NSAIDs: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:2380-2389. [PMID: 35941494 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05399-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine rectal administration of 100 mg of diclofenac or indomethacin was demonstrated to be an effective prevention method to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. The systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the incidence and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and explore the discrepancies of PEP incidences among different subgroups. METHODS The PubMed, Web of Science, and Ovid EMBASE databases were searched for studies published until December 2020. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported rectal administration of 100 mg or higher doses of diclofenac or indomethacin, with PEP as the primary outcomes were eligible for inclusion. The overall and severity of PEP were estimated. Subgroup analysis was performed based on geographic regions, risk level, study beginning time, type of NSAIDs, administration time, and sample size. RESULTS There were 26 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 7954 patients in 31 NSAIDs arms. The pooled incidences were 7.2% for overall PEP (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.9-8.5%), 5.0% for mild PEP (95% CI, 4.0-6.0%), and 1.5% for moderate and severe PEP (0.8-2.3%). PEP rate were higher in patients receiving rectal indomethacin than that of patients receiving rectal diclofenac (7.8% (95% CI, 6.4-9.3%) vs 3.8% (95% CI, 2.2-5.3%), p = 0.009). The PEP rates of high-risk patients and average-risk patients were 8.9% (95% CI, 5.6-12.2%) and 6.4% (95% CI, 5.1-7.6%), respectively (p = 0.160). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of PEP was higher in patients receiving 100 mg rectal indomethacin than patients receiving 100 mg diclofenac. The effect of 100 mg diclofenac versus indomethacin on preventing PEP requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Kang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyang Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.,Department of Ultrasound, The 305 Hospital of PLA, Bejing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhangqian Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhirui Zhou
- Radiation Oncology Center, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Yajie Lu
- Department of Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Lijun Lou
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuegang Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanglin Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
The clinical effect of primary duct closure and T-tube drainage: A propensity score matched study. Asian J Surg 2022:S1015-9584(22)01411-7. [PMID: 36283872 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is considered a safe and effective method for the removal of bile duct stones, selecting primary duct closure (PDC) or T-tube drainage (TTD) following choledochotomy remains controversial. This study aims to explore the clinical effects of PDC and TTD after LCBDE. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 348 patients with choledocholithiasis treated with LCBDE from January 2016 to October 2020. All patients were divided into PDC (225 cases) and TTD (123 cases) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. We compared operative parameters and outcomes. RESULTS After matching (n = 116/group), no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05) regarding intra-abdominal infection, incision infection, bile leakage, and retained stones. In terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative antibiotic use time, and postoperative abdominal drainage time, PDC group was obviously superior to TTD group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Primary closure following LCBDE is considered a safe and effective alternative to T-tube drainage.
Collapse
|
23
|
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Prevention, Diagnosis and Management. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58091261. [PMID: 36143938 PMCID: PMC9502657 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58091261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) carries a post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) rate of 2–10%, which could be as high as 30–50% in high-risk cases. PEP is severe in up to 5% of cases, with potential for life-threatening complications, including multi-organ failure, peripancreatic fluid collections, and death in up to 1% of cases. The risk of PEP is potentially predictable and may be modified with pharmacological measures and endoscopist technique. This review covers the definition, epidemiology and risk factors for PEP, with a focus on the latest evidence-based medical and endoscopic strategies to prevent and manage PEP.
Collapse
|
24
|
Prognostic scores in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography acute pancreatitis: should we use all, some, or none? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 34:905-911. [PMID: 35830364 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Acute pancreatitis is the most commonly observed adverse event following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Early risk stratification is crucial in the management of these patients, to reduce unfavorable outcomes. Multiple prognostic scores are already used in acute pancreatitis, regardless of its etiology. Scarce data is available for their use specifically on post-ERCP acute pancreatitis (PEP). We aimed to compare the accuracy of different prognostic scores at PEP diagnosis for the prediction of a moderate-to-severe course. METHODS Cross-sectional study of consecutive ERCPs performed between 2010 and 2020. The final sample included patients with PEP, with the severity graded according to the Atlanta classification. For each patient, different prognostic scores were calculated. Each score's accuracy for the prediction of a moderate-to-severe course was assessed by analysis of receiving-operating-characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS From 2012 ERCPs, 102 (5.1%) were complicated by PEP. From these, 34 (1.7% of all ERCPs) were classified as moderate-to-severe. The scores with the best accuracy in predicting a moderate-to-severe course were the BISAP [ area under curve (AUC) = 0.92], Balthazar (AUC = 0.89) and Glasgow-Imrie (AUC = 0.88) scores, with very good to excellent acuities. APACHE II (AUC = 0.81), Marshall score (AUC = 0.81) and PANC3 score (AUC = 0.76) revealed good accuracies. Ranson's criteria on admission (AUC = 0.70) and HAPS classification (AUC = 0.67) presented less accurate results. Optimal cutoffs for the top scoring classifications were BISAP ≥3 (sensitivity 88.3% and specificity 83.8%), Balthazar ≥2 (sensitivity 84.8% and specificity 85.3%) and Glasgow-Imrie ≥4 (sensitivity 81.0% and specificity 82.6%). CONCLUSION BISAP, Balthazar and Glasgow-Imrie classifications presented the best results for predicting moderate-to-severe PEP, and represent the most useful prognostic scores for risk stratification in this population.
Collapse
|
25
|
Akshintala VS, Singh A, Singh VK. Prevention and Management of Complications of Biliary Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:397-409. [PMID: 35691688 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an essential procedure for the management of pancreaticobiliary disorders. ERCP is, however, associated with the risk of complications including pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, infection, and instrument failure, which can often be fatal. It is, therefore, necessary to recognize the risk of ERCP-associated complications and understand the methods to prevent and treat such complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venkata S Akshintala
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 East Monument Street, Suite 428, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Anmol Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 East Monument Street, Suite 428, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Vikesh K Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 East Monument Street, Suite 428, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
The Landscape of Acute Pancreatitis Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: A Cross-sectional Study. Pancreas 2022; 51:445-451. [PMID: 35835101 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical studies are important in informing evidence-based practice for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). To determine whether registered studies adequately meet this need, we leveraged the ClinicalTrials.gov database to provide an overview of studies pertaining to AP. METHODS ClinicalTrials.gov was searched and the search term used was AP. Analysis was restricted to studies registered before January 12, 2021. RESULTS Of 363,632 trials overall, 234 (0.06%) were eventually included for analysis. Interventional studies and observational studies comprised 67.5% and 32.5% of these studies respectively. Most studies were initiated 2007 or later. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was the single most frequent cause of AP specified in these studies (16.7%). Nearly 72% of these studies had a sample size greater than 50. With respect to study design, 87.3% of interventional studies were randomized, 53.5% were blinded. The top 3 countries with the largest number of registered studies were China (n = 59), followed by the United States (n = 53) and India (n = 12). CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that the research activity falls short of what is needed in terms of the burden of AP. The distribution of these AP-related studies by global regions indicates that there exists regional disparities.
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhang Q, Deng DH, Liu J, Chen WW, Chen J, Chen CW. Application of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2022; 30:198-203. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v30.i4.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the most important methods for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in clinical prevention of PEP, but the application standards are not unified. This article reviews the progress in the research of the preventive effect of different types of NSAIDs on PEP, their administration routes, timing, and dosage, and combination with other drugs, as well as the preventive effect of NSAIDs in different risk stratification populations, and points out that indomethacin and diclofenac are the most commonly used types of NSAIDs, which should be given at 100 mg via rectal administration before ERCP in all non-selected patients with no contraindications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Zhang
- Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116000, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Deng-Hao Deng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Wei-Wei Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Juan Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Chao-Wu Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
If endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails in cases of biliary obstruction and jaundice, percutaneous drains have been traditionally the current second-line option. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) with choledocoduodenostomy or hepaticogastrostomy is alternative modality that have shown equivalent or better technical and clinical success compared with percutaneous drainage. Similarly, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage has emerged as a therapeutic option in acute cholecystitis as well. Furthermore, EUS-BD avoids some of the pitfalls of percutaneous drainage. Current research in EUS-BD involves optimizing devices to improve technical and clinical success. In centers with advanced endoscopists trained in these procedures, EUS-BD is an excellent second-line modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shyam Vedantam
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Sunil Amin
- Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th Street, Clinical Research Building, Suite 11145 (D-49), Miami, FL 33136, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ali FS, DaVee T, Bernstam EV, Kao LS, Wandling M, Hussain MR, Rashtak S, Ramireddy S, Guha S, Thosani N. Cost-effectiveness analysis of optimal diagnostic strategy for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with intermediate probability for choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:327-338. [PMID: 34499905 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EUS, MRCP, and intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) are the recommended diagnostic modalities for patients with intermediate probability for choledocholithiasis (IPC). The relative cost-effectiveness of these modalities in patients with cholelithiasis and IPC is understudied. METHODS We developed a decision tree for diagnosing IPC (base-case probability, 50%; range, 10%-70%); patients with a positive test were modeled to undergo therapeutic ERCP. The strategies tested were laparoscopic cholecystectomy with IOC (LC-IOC), MRCP, single-session EUS + ERCP, and separate-session EUS + ERCP. Costs and probabilities were extracted from the published literature. Effectiveness was assessed by assigning utility scores to health states, average proportion of true-positive diagnosis of IPC, and the mean length of stay (LOS) per strategy. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by extrapolating a net-monetary benefit (NMB) and average cost per true-positive diagnosis. RESULTS LC-IOC was the most cost-effective strategy to diagnose IPC (base-case probability of 50%) among patients with cholelithiasis in health state-based effectiveness analysis (NMB of $34,612), diagnostic test accuracy-based effectiveness analysis (average cost of $13,260 per true-positive diagnosis), and LOS-based effectiveness analysis (mean LOS of 4.13) compared with strategies 2 (MRCP), 3 (single-session EUS + ERCP), and 4 (separate-session EUS + ERCP). These findings were robust on deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS For patients with cholelithiasis with IPC, LC-IOC is a cost-effective approach that should limit preoperative testing and may shorten hospital LOS. Our findings may be used to design institutional and organizational management protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal S Ali
- Center for interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tomas DaVee
- Center for interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elmer V Bernstam
- Department of General Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, and School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lillian S Kao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mike Wandling
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Maryam R Hussain
- Department of Public Health, Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shahrooz Rashtak
- Center for interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Srinivas Ramireddy
- Center for interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sushovan Guha
- Center for interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nirav Thosani
- Center for interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zeng C, Zhang Y, Yang H, Hong J. Prevention of pancreatitis after stent implantation for distal malignant biliary strictures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:141-154. [PMID: 35020545 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2027239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biliary stent placement remains a palliative treatment for patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary strictures (DMBS). The incidence of post-ERCP-pancreatitis (PEP) significantly increases in patients receiving fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) who undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). AREAS COVERED This review provides an overview of prevention of PEP after stent implantation for DMBSs. The following operational variables were evaluated: (1) stent type (plastic or metal stent); (2) stent location (above or across the sphincter of Oddi); (3) prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement; (4) endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane database were searched to identify eligible studies up to October 2021. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using fixed- or random- effects models. EXPERT OPINION 1. PEP occurs more frequently in DMBS patients with self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) compared to that plastic stent (PS). 2. The PEP incidence is higher in covered stents than that in uncovered self-expandable metal stents (USEMS), but not significantly. 3. PEP incidence increases in patients receiving transpapillary FCSEMS placement, particularly when there is an absence of pancreatic duct dilation, and prophylactic pancreatic stenting is recommended for these patients. 4. Limited studies with small sample indicate that there is no significant difference in PEP incidence between transpapillary and suprapapillary stents placement for DMBS. 5. Limited studies indicate that EST does not significantly affect the incidence of pancreatitis in DMBS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuanfei Zeng
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yiling Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Hui Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.,Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Junbo Hong
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jang DK, Kim J, Paik CN, Kim JW, Lee TH, Jang JY, Yoon SB, Lee JK. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related adverse events in Korea: A nationwide assessment. United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 10:73-79. [PMID: 34953054 PMCID: PMC8830275 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a pivotal procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of pancreatobiliary diseases, it has been known that the risk of procedure‐related adverse events (AEs) is significant. Objective We conducted this nationwide cohort study since there have been few reports on the real‐world data regarding ERCP‐related AEs. Methods Patients who underwent ERCP were identified between 2012 and 2015 using Health Insurance Review and Assessment database generated by the Korea government. Incidence, annual trends, demographics, characteristics according to the types of procedures, and the risk factors of AEs were assessed. Results A total of 114,757 patients with male gender of 54.2% and the mean age of 65.0 ± 15.2 years were included. The most common indication was choledocholithiasis (49.4%) and the second malignant biliary obstruction (22.8%). Biliary drainage (33.9%) was the most commonly performed procedure, followed by endoscopic sphincterotomy (27.4%), and stone removal (22.0%). The overall incidence of ERCP‐related AEs was 4.7% consisting of post‐ERCP pancreatitis (PEP; 4.6%), perforation (0.06%), and hemorrhage (0.02%), which gradually increased from 2012 to 2015. According to the type of procedures, ERCP‐related AEs developed the most commonly after pancreatic stent insertion (11.4%), followed by diagnostic ERCP (5.9%) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (5.7%). Younger age and diagnostic ERCP turned out to be independent risk factors of PEP. Conclusions ERCP‐related AEs developed the most commonly after pancreatic stent insertion, diagnostic ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy. Special caution should be used for young patients receiving diagnostic ERCP due to increased risk of PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Kee Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jungmee Kim
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Nyol Paik
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Hee Lee
- Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Young Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Bae Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Kyu Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
The Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as an Early Predictive Marker of the Severity of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. Medicina (B Aires) 2021; 58:medicina58010013. [PMID: 35056321 PMCID: PMC8780238 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58010013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 12/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives: Factors predictive of severe non-iatrogenic acute pancreatitis have been investigated, but few studies have evaluated prognostic markers of severe post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). The neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been studied for predicting severe acute pancreatitis. We examined the predictive value of NLR in patients with PEP. Materials and Methods: From January 2012 to August 2021, 125 patients who developed PEP were retrospectively evaluated. The NLR was measured before, and on days 1 and 2 after, ERCP. PEP was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe according to consensus guidelines, based on the prolongation of planned hospitalization. Patients were divided into two groups, mild-to-moderate vs. severe PEP. Results: We analyzed 125 patients with PEP, 18 (14.4%) of whom developed severe PEP. The baseline NLR was similar between the two groups (2.26 vs. 3.34, p = 0.499). The severe PEP group had a higher NLR than the mild/moderate PEP group on days 1 (11.19 vs. 6.58, p = 0.001) and 2 (15.68 vs. 5.32, p < 0.001) post-ERCP. The area under the curve of the NLR on days 1 and 2 post-ERCP for severe PEP was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64–0.86)) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81–0.97), respectively; NLR on day 2 had greater power to predict severe PEP. The optimal cutoff value of the NLR on days 1 and 2 after ERCP for prediction of severe PEP was 7.38 (sensitivity, 72%; specificity, 69%) and 8.17 (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 83%), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, a Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis score ≥3 (odds ratio (OR) 9.07, p = 0.012) and NLR on day 2 > 8.17 (OR 18.29, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with severe PEP. Conclusions: The NLR on day 2 post-ERCP is a reliable prognostic marker of severe PEP.
Collapse
|
33
|
Forbes N, Leontiadis GI, Vaska M, Elmunzer BJ, Yuan Y, Bishay K, Meng ZW, Iannuzzi J, O'Sullivan DE, Mah B, Partridge ACR, Henderson AM, Qureshi A, Keswani RN, Wani S, Bridges RJ, Heitman SJ, Hilsden RJ, Ruan Y, Brenner DR. Adverse events associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e053302. [PMID: 34404717 PMCID: PMC8372880 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is performed to diagnose and manage conditions of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. Though effective, it is associated with common adverse events (AEs). The purpose of this study is to systematically review ERCP AE rates and report up-to-date pooled estimates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A comprehensive electronic search will be conducted of relevant medical databases through 10 November 2020. A study team of eight data abstracters will independently determine study eligibility, assess quality and abstract data in parallel, with any two concordant entries constituting agreement and with discrepancies resolved by consensus. The primary outcome will be the pooled incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, with secondary outcomes including post-ERCP bleeding, cholangitis, perforation, cholecystitis, death and unplanned healthcare encounters. Secondary outcomes will also include rates of specific and overall AEs within clinically relevant subgroups determined a priori. DerSimonian and Laird random effects models will be used to perform meta-analyses of these outcomes. Sources of heterogeneity will be explored via meta-regression. Subgroup analyses based on median dates of data collection across studies will be performed to determine whether AE rates have changed over time. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval is not required for this study as it is a planned meta-analysis of previously published data. Participant consent is similarly not required. Dissemination is planned via presentation at relevant conferences in addition to publication in peer-reviewed journals.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020220221.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nauzer Forbes
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Grigorios I Leontiadis
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcus Vaska
- Knowledge Resource Service, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Yuhong Yuan
- Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kirles Bishay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zhao Wu Meng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jordan Iannuzzi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Dylan E O'Sullivan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Brittany Mah
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Arun C R Partridge
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Amanda M Henderson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aatif Qureshi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Rajesh N Keswani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Ronald J Bridges
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven J Heitman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Robert J Hilsden
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Yibing Ruan
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Control Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Darren R Brenner
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Control Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2021; 48:573-580. [PMID: 34331625 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-021-01114-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is used to evaluate the narrowing of the main pancreatic duct in autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and biliary stricture in IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC). Intraductal ultrasonography enables detailed visualization of the thickening of the bile duct wall in IgG4-SC. Pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, and primary sclerosing cholangitis are important mimicking conditions of AIP and IgG4-SC. Diffuse or segmental stricture without marked upstream dilatation is a typical pancreatographic finding in AIP. By contrast, a single, short stricture with marked upstream dilatation is a typical finding in pancreatic cancer. The cholangiogram of IgG4-SC is classified into four types based on biliary stricture location, and this cholangiogram classification is useful for the differential diagnosis of IgG4-SC. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography can be used to distinguish between IgG4-SC and primary sclerosing cholangitis. A segmental/long and intrapancreatic stricture is a characteristic finding of IgG4-SC, whereas band-like strictures, a beaded or pruned-tree appearance, and diverticulum-like outpouching are characteristic of primary sclerosing cholangitis. The characteristic intraductal ultrasonographic findings of circular-symmetrical wall thickening, smooth outer and inner margins, and homogeneous internal echo at the biliary stricture site are useful for diagnosis of IgG4-SC. Thickening of the bile duct wall at non-stricture sites is also a typical intraductal ultrasonographic finding of IgG4-SC and can be used for differential diagnosis from cholangiocarcinoma. Transpapillary bile duct and duodenal papilla biopsy during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are also useful in the diagnosis of IgG4-SC.
Collapse
|
35
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jacques Devière
- Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bhatt H. Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: An Updated Review of Current Preventive Strategies. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2021; 14:27-32. [PMID: 33564256 PMCID: PMC7866941 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s276361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatitis is a serious complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, with incidence rates as high as 16% in some centers. Recent studies have also shown an upward trend in hospitalization due to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related pancreatitis. Early interventions taken before, during, and after the procedure can significantly reduce the risk of pancreatitis and decrease morbidity and mortality of the patients. To select appropriate patients for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, in-depth knowledge of the patient-related and procedure-related risk factors is required. This updated clinical review outlines various pharmacological agents and surgical methods used for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Current evidence supports the use of rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and pancreatic stent placement as an effective preventive strategy. Further research is needed to compare these preventive modalities to improve patient outcomes after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harshil Bhatt
- Goshen Hospital, Goshen, IN, USA.,Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|