Frequencies of Genetic Polymorphisms of Clinically Relevant Gene-Drug Pairs in a German Psychiatric Inpatient Population

Frequencies of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 gene variants in a German inpatient sample with mood and anxiety disorders

OBJECTIVES

Previous results demonstrated that CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 gene variants affect serum concentrations of antidepressants. We implemented a PGx service determining gene variants in CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 in our clinical routine care and report on our first patient cohort.

METHODS

We analysed CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 allele, genotype, and phenotype frequencies, and actionable pharmacogenetic variants in this German psychiatric inpatient cohort. Two-tailed z-test was used to investigate for differences in CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 phenotypes and actionable/non-actionable genetic variant frequencies between our cohort and reference cohorts.

RESULTS

Out of the 154 patients included, 44.8% of patients were classified as CYP2D6 normal metabolizer, 38.3% as intermediate metabolizers, 8.4% as poor metabolizers, and 2.6% as ultrarapid metabolizers. As for CYP2C19, 40.9% of patients were classified as normal metabolizers, 19.5% as intermediate metabolizers, 2.6% as poor metabolizers, 31.2% as rapid metabolizers, and 5.8% as ultrarapid metabolizers. Approximately, 80% of patients had at least one actionable PGx variant.

CONCLUSION

There is a high prevalence of actionable PGx variants in psychiatric inpatients which may affect treatment response. Physicians should refer to PGx-informed dosing guidelines in carriers of these variants. Pre-emptive PGx testing in general may facilitate precision medicine also for other drugs metabolised by CYP2D6 and/or CYP2C19.

A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Studies in Depression

BACKGROUND

Genetic polymorphism has been proven to have an important association with depression, which can influence the risk of developing depression, the efficacy of medications, and adverse effects via metabolic and neurological pathways. Nonetheless, aspects of the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and depression have not been systematically investigated by bibliometric analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the current status and trends of single nucleotide polymorphism research on depression through bibliometric and visual analysis.

METHODS

The Web of Science Core Collection was used to retrieve 10,043 articles that were published between 1998 and 2021. CiteSpace (6.1 R4) was used to perform collaborative network analysis, co-citation analysis, co-occurrence analysis, and citation burst detection.

RESULTS

The most productive and co-cited journals were the Journal of Affective Disorders and Biological Psychiatry, respectively, and an analysis of the references showed that the most recent research focused on the largest thematic cluster, "5-HT", reflecting the important research base in this area. "CYP2D6" has been in the spotlight since its emergence in 2009 and has become a research hotspot since its outbreak in 2019. However, "BDNF ", "COMT ", "older adults", "loci", and "DNA methylation" are also the new frontier of research, and some of them are currently in the process of exploration.

CONCLUSION

These findings offer a useful perspective on existing research and potential future approaches in the study of the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and depression, which may assist researchers in selecting appropriate collaborators or journals.

Rates of Divergent Pharmacogenes in a Psychiatric Cohort of Inpatients with Depression-Arguments for Preemptive Testing

Background: The international drug agencies annotate pharmacogenes for many years. Pharmacogenetic testing is thus far only established in few settings, assuming that only few patients are actually affected by drug-gene interactions. Methods: 108 hospitalized patients with major depressive disorder were genotyped for CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, NAT2, DPYD; VKORC1 and TMTP. Results: We found 583 (mean 5.4, median 5) divergent phenotypes (i.e., divergent from the common phenotypes considered normal, e.g., extensive metabolizer) in the 12 analyzed pharmacokinetic genes. The rate for at least one divergent phenotype was 100% in our cohort for CYP, but also for all 12 important pharmacogenes: patients had at least two divergent phenotypes. Compared to a large Danish cohort, CYP2C9 NM and IM status, CYP2C19 UM, CYP2D6 UM and DYPD (GAS 0, 1, 2) genotypes differed statistical significantly. For CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, 13% of the patients were normal metabolizers for both enzymes in our cohort, but this value was 27.3% in the Danish cohort, which is a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Divergent phenotypes in pharmacogenes are not the exception, but the rule. Patients with divergent phenotypes seem more prone for hospitalization, emphasizing the need for pre-emptive testing to avoid inefficacy and adverse drug effects in all patients.

The Pharmacogenetics of Opiates and Its Impact on Delirium in Mechanically Ventilated Adults: A Pilot Study

Background: Pharmacogenetics may explain a substantial proportion of the variation seen in the efficacy and risk profile of analgesosedative drugs and the incidence of delirium in critically ill adults. Objectives: Conduct a feasibility study to demonstrate the reliability of collecting and analyzing pharmacogenetic information from critically ill patients and to assess the impact of pharmacogenetics on intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes. Methods: We prospectively enrolled subjects from the Medical ICU at the University of North Carolina (UNC). DNA was obtained via a buccal swab and evaluated using the DNA2Rx assay. We collected data on demographics, daily cumulative psychoactive medication exposure, and severity of illness. We performed daily delirium assessments via the CAM-ICU. We analyzed associations between select single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and delirium. Results: From June, 2018 through January, 2019, we screened 244 patients and enrolled 50. The median age was 62.0 years old (range: 28-82 years old), and 27 (54%) of the subjects were female. In all, 49 (98%) samples were both high quality and sufficient quantity. In secondary analyses, we found that 80% (12/15) of patients with two 2 copies of a G allele at rs4680 on COMT experienced delirium, whereas 44% (4/9) of patients with 2 copies of an A allele at this location had delirium. In all, 44% (4/9) of patients with 2 T allele copies at rs7439366 on UGT2B7 experienced delirium compared to 73% (11/15) of patients with 2 C allele copies at this location. Conclusions: We can feasibly collect genetic information from critically ill adults. We were able to efficiently collect high quality DNA of sufficient quantity to conduct pharmacogenetic analysis in this critically ill population. Although the sample size of our current study is too small to conduct robust inferential analyses, it suggests potential SNP targets for a future larger study.

The Influence of Pharmacogenetics on the Clinical Relevance of Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions: Drug-Gene, Drug-Gene-Gene and Drug-Drug-Gene Interactions

Drug interactions are a well-known cause of adverse drug events, and drug interaction databases can help the clinician to recognize and avoid such interactions and their adverse events. However, not every interaction leads to an adverse drug event. This is because the clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions also depends on the genetic profile of the patient. If inhibitors or inducers of drug metabolising enzymes (e.g., CYP and UGT) are added to the drug therapy, phenoconcversion can occur. This leads to a genetic phenotype that mismatches the observable phenotype. Drug-drug-gene and drug-gene-gene interactions influence the toxicity and/or ineffectivness of the drug therapy. To date, there have been limited published studies on the impact of genetic variations on drug-drug interactions. This review discusses the current evidence of drug-drug-gene interactions, as well as drug-gene-gene interactions. Phenoconversion is explained, the and methods to calculate the phenotypes are described. Clinical recommendations are given regarding the integratation of the PGx results in the assessment of the relevance of drug interactions in the future.

Pharmacogenetic genotype and phenotype frequencies in a large Danish population-based case-cohort sample

Pharmacogenetics aims to improve clinical care by studying the relationship between genetic variation and variable drug response. Large population-based datasets could improve our current understanding of pharmacogenetics from selected study populations. We provide real-world pharmacogenetic frequencies of genotypes and (combined) phenotypes of a large Danish population-based case-cohort sample (iPSYCH2012; data of the Integrative Psychiatric Research consortium). The genotyped sample consists of 77,684 individuals, of which 51,464 individuals had diagnoses of severe mental disorders (SMD case-cohort) and 26,220 were individuals randomly selected from the Danish population (population cohort). Array-based genotype data imputed to 8.4 million genetic variants was searched for a selected pharmacogenetic panel of 42 clinically relevant variants and a CYP2D6 gene deletion and duplication. We identified 19 of 42 variants. Minor allele frequencies (MAFs) were consistent with previously reported MAFs, and did not differ between SMD cases and population cohorts. Almost all individuals carried at least one genetic variant (> 99.9%) and 87% carried three or more genetic variants. When genotypes were translated into phenotypes, also > 99.9% of individuals had at least one divergent phenotype (i.e. divergent from the common phenotypes considered normal, e.g. extensive metabolizer). The high number of identified individuals with at least one pharmacogenetic variant or divergent phenotype indicates the importance of pharmacogenetic panel-based genotyping. Combined CYP2C19-CYP2D6 phenotypes revealed that 72.7% of individuals had divergent phenotypes for one or both enzymes. As CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 have an important role in the metabolism of psychotropic drugs, this indicates the relevance of pharmacogenetic testing specifically in individuals using psychotropic drugs.