Patterns of Thromboembolism in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing First-Line Chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel

Analysis of thromboembolism and prognosis in metastatic pancreatic cancer from the Tokushukai REAl‑world data project

Cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT), including venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE), is a frequent complication of advanced pancreatic cancer. However, reports on its incidence and clinical outcomes, especially on ATE, are limited. The present study aimed to investigate the incidence of CAT and its effects on overall survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. As part of the Tokushukai REAl-world data project in Japan, 846 eligible patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy were identified between April 2010 and March 2020. Using diagnosis procedure combination data from these patients, the present study investigated the incidence of VTE, ATE and cerebral and gastrointestinal bleeding requiring hospitalization. Blood laboratory data were collected within 14 days of the start of first-line treatment, and Khorana scores were calculated. The associations between CAT complications and comorbidities, concomitant medications and prognosis were examined. Among the 846 patients, 21 (2.5) and 70 (8.3%) had VTE and ATE, respectively (including five with overlapping VTE and ATE). CAT-positive patients had a significantly higher rate of gastrointestinal bleeding events compared with CAT-negative patients [13 of 86 (15.2%) vs. 46 of 760 (6.1%); P=0.01]. CAT-positive patients had a poorer prognosis [hazard ratio (HR), 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.62] compared with CAT-negative patients, even after adjusting for background factors (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.95-1.52). Cox regression analyses showed that higher Khorana scores were associated with significantly worse prognosis. This real-world data demonstrated that the incidence rate of CAT in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer was 10.2%, and no statistically significant differences were observed, although there was a trend toward an adverse prognosis. The Khorana score may also be useful for predicting prognosis, even in the absence of CAT. This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm; clinical trial no. UMIN000050590).

Incidence, risk factors and the prognostic role of thromboembolic events (TEEs) amongst patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD): a retrospective, single-center analysis

Background

Thromboembolic events (TEEs) are frequent among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD). We set out to estimate the incidence and establish predictive risk factors for TEE and estimate the impact of TEEs on the overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic PAAD.

Methods

This is a retrospective, single-center study. We included patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of PAAD with distant metastases treated at AC Camargo Cancer Center from 2016 to 2021. We used the competitive risk survival models to estimate the cumulative incidence of TEE. Risk factors for the development of TEEs were evaluated using the competitive risk and logistic regression models. The impact of TEEs on OS was assessed using both landmark and time-dependent covariate Cox survival analyses.

Results

The study population consists of 199 patients. The cumulative incidence of TEEs in 1, 6 and 24 months were 10.1%, 19.3% and 30.2%, respectively. Log10(CA 19-9) was the only factor independently associated with increased risk of TEEs in the logistic regression (Odds ratio = 1.03; 95% confidence interval (95%CI), 1.00-1.06; p = 0.030) and competitive risk survival (Subdistribution hazard ratio = 1.14; 95%CI, 1.02-1.27; p = 0.019) models. In the landmark analysis, early TEEs (within 1 month of diagnosis) were not associated with inferior OS. In the time-dependent covariate Cox proportional hazard model, TEEs were not found to be statistically associated with inferior OS, although there was a trend towards it (Hazard ratio = 1.59; 95%CI, 0.99-2.54; p = 0.051).

Conclusion

TEEs occur in a large fraction of patients with metastatic PAAD. Statistical models with higher predictive performance are currently needed. For the time being, consideration for prophylactic anticoagulation should be done on an individual basis.

Cancer progression and tumor hypercoagulability: a platelet perspective

Venous thromboembolism, which is common in cancer patients and accompanies or even precedes malignant tumors, is known as cancer-related thrombosis and is an important cause of cancer- associated death. At present, the exact etiology of the elevated incidence of venous thrombosis in cancer patients remains elusive. Platelets play a crucial role in blood coagulation, which is intimately linked to the development of arterial thrombosis. Additionally, platelets contribute to tumor progression and facilitate immune evasion by tumors. Tumor cells can interact with the coagulation system through various mechanisms, such as producing hemostatic proteins, activating platelets, and directly adhering to normal cells. The relationship between platelets and malignant tumors is also significant. In this review article, we will explore these connections.

Venous thromboembolism incidence and association with overall survival in pancreatic cancer: A Finnish nationwide cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). We investigated the incidence of VTE before and after the diagnosis of PC and its association with overall survival.

METHODS

We identified PC patients diagnosed in 2013-2016 from the Finnish Cancer Registry. Data on healthcare visits and death were collected, along with follow-up data through the end of 2020. We compared patients who underwent radical-intent surgery (RIS) to those who underwent palliative treatment (PT) alone.

RESULTS

We identified 4086 PC patients, of whom 343 (8.4%) underwent RIS and 3743 (91.6%) received PT. VTE incidence within 1 year before a PC diagnosis was higher in the PT (4.2%, n = 156) than in the RIS group (0.6%, n = 2; p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of VTE at 12 and 24 months after a PC diagnosis was 6% (n = 21) and 9% (n = 31), respectively, within the RIS group, and 8% (n = 286) and 8% (n = 304) within the PT group. In the PT group, a VTE within 1 year before a PC diagnosis was independently associated with a worse survival {hazard ratio, HR 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-2.2]}. In both groups, VTE after a PC diagnosis was associated with a worse survival [RIS group: HR 2.6 (95%CI 1.8-3.7) vs. PT group: HR 2.2 (95%CI 1.9-2.4)].

CONCLUSIONS

A VTE within 1 year before a PC diagnosis more often occurred among PT PC patients than among patients who underwent RIS. VTE might serve as a diagnostic clue to detect PC at an earlier stage.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Associated with Increased Risk of Postoperative DVT After Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: a NSQIP Analysis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a persistent source of postoperative morbidity despite prevention and mitigation efforts. Cancer, surgery, and chemotherapy are known risk factors for VTE. Existing literature suggests that neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) may contribute to increased VTE risk in the postoperative period, but few authors specifically examine this relationship in distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this study, we analyze the association of NAT and postoperative VTE in patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP) for PDAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we analyzed the Procedure Targeted files for pancreatectomy from 2014 to 2020. Adults with PDAC who underwent DP were grouped by receipt of NAT. The primary outcome was the rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and the secondary outcome was the rate of pulmonary embolism (PE). We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine risk factors associated with postoperative DVT.

RESULTS

There were 4327 patients with PDAC who underwent DP. Of these, 1414 (32.7%) had NAT. Receipt of NAT was significantly associated with postoperative DVT requiring therapy (3.5% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.02), but was not associated with PE (p = 0.42). On MVA, NAT was associated with a 73% greater chance of developing postoperative DVT [odds ratio (OR) 1.73, 95% CI 1.18-2.55].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who receive NAT prior to DP for PDAC are 73% more likely to develop postoperative DVT compared with upfront resection. As NAT becomes more commonplace, these high-risk patients should be prioritized for guideline-recommended extended duration prophylaxis.

Contact system and intrinsic pathway activation in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Despite high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with pancreatic cancer, there are little data on contact system activation in these patients.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify contact system and intrinsic pathway activation and subsequent VTE risk in patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were compared with controls. Blood was drawn at baseline and patients were followed for 6 months. Complexes of proteases with their natural inhibitors, C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH), antithrombin (AT), or alpha-1 antitrypsin (α1at), were measured for complexes containing kallikrein (PKa:C1-INH), factor (F)XIIa (FXIIa:C1-INH), and FXIa (FXIa:C1-INH, FXIa:AT, FXIa:α1at). The association of cancer with complex levels was assessed in a linear regression model, adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. In a competing risk regression model, we assessed associations between complex levels and VTE.

RESULTS

One hundred nine patients with pancreatic cancer and 22 controls were included. The mean age was 66 years (SD, 8.4) in the cancer cohort and 52 years (SD, 10.1) in controls. In the cancer cohort, 18 (16.7%) patients developed VTE during follow-up. In the multivariable regression model, pancreatic cancer was associated with increased complexes of PKa:C1-INH (P < .001), FXIa:C1-INH (P < .001), and FXIa:AT (P < .001). High FXIa:α1at (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.48 per log increase; 95% CI, 1.02-2.16) and FXIa:AT (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.78 highest vs lower quartiles; 95% CI, 1.10-7.00) were associated with VTE.

CONCLUSION

Complexes of proteases with their natural inhibitors were elevated in patients with cancer. These data suggest that the contact system and intrinsic pathway activation are increased in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Hemostasis and cancer: Impact of haemostatic biomarkers for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with cancer

Patients with cancer are characterized by a dysregulation of the hemostatic system and systemic hypercoagulability. Different components of the hemostatic system are involved in tumor-promoting mechanisms including primary tumor growth, cancer cell invasion, immune evasion, angiogenesis, and the metastatic process. Therefore, different degrees of systemic hemostatic activation in patients with cancer can reflect distinct underlying biological phenotypes of cancer and seem to correlate with cancer aggressiveness. Peripheral blood levels of hemostatic biomarkers, indicating the activation status of different parts of the hemostatic system including the coagulation cascade, fibrinolytic activity, platelet activation, or endothelial activation, can be used to reflect cancer-associated systemic hypercoagulability. Thereby, hemostatic biomarkers represent promising candidates to investigate as surrogate markers for underlying cancer activity and progression dynamics and therefore as biomarkers for the prediction of clinical outcomes in cancer patients. In the present review, we provide an up-to-date summary of available data on hemostatic biomarkers for prognostication of overall survival and prediction of therapy response in patients with cancer, including specific oncologic treatment settings for potential clinical application. We provide a thorough discussion on potential clinical implementation and current limitations and highlight the most promising emerging biomarkers that might be used to contribute to risk-stratified, personalized oncologic decision making in the future.

Primary ambulatory thromboprophylaxis in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy: hope or hype?

Thrombosis is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients. Patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) have a very high risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Even though primary ambulatory thromboprophylaxis (PATP) could decrease this risk, there are uncertain issues with regard to the choice and dose of anticoagulants, duration of anticoagulant therapy, and patient selection criteria. In addition, the current practice guidelines on PATP in PC patients are equivocal. This review critically appraises the evidence on the use of PATP in PC patients receiving chemotherapy.

Unanswered questions in cancer-associated thrombosis

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Treatment of cancer-associated VTE comes with a heightened risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding that differs by choice of anticoagulant as well as by patient- and disease-specific risk factors. Available data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies in cancer-associated VTE suggest that direct oral anticoagulants are effective, continuing anticoagulation beyond six months is indicated in those with active cancer and that patients who develop 'breakthrough' thrombotic events can be effectively treated. We review the evidence that addresses these key clinical questions and offer pragmatic approaches in individualizing care. While significant investigative efforts over the past decade have made impactful advances, future research is needed to better define the factors that contribute to anticoagulant-related bleeding and VTE recurrence, in order to aid clinical decision-making that improves the care of patients with cancer-associated VTE.