1
|
Hamada K, Honda M, Horikawa Y, Shiwa Y, Techigawara K, Nagahashi T, Ishikawa M, Takeda Y, Fukushima D, Nishino N, Uesugi N, Suzuki M, Sugai T. Histopathologic vertical margin positivity in cold snare polypectomy and mucosal resection for sessile serrated lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 100:283-291. [PMID: 38272275 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data regarding the status of the vertical margin of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) resected using cold snare polypectomy (CSP) are lacking, and whether a histopathologically positive vertical margin is related to recurrence remains unclear. Therefore, this preliminary study aimed to clarify the rates of positive or unassessable vertical and horizontal margins and the rate of muscularis mucosae resection in SSLs treated using CSP compared with those treated with EMR. METHODS Histologic outcomes of patients treated with CSP or EMR for SSLs were evaluated in this single-center observational study. The primary outcome was the incidence of histopathologically positive vertical margins in CSP and EMR. Furthermore, the comparisons were adjusted for confounding factors using propensity score matching. RESULTS Overall, 82 patients with SSLs were included in the CSP and EMR groups after matching. The incidence of positive histologic vertical margins in the CSP and EMR groups were 67.1% and 2.4%, respectively (P < .001). Regarding the evaluation of the presence of muscularis mucosae, 29.3% and 98.8% of patients in the CSP and EMR groups, respectively, had a complete muscularis mucosae resection (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS A rigorous histopathologic evaluation revealed that for SSLs, CSP more frequently leads to positive vertical margins than EMR. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000051569.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan; Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Michitaka Honda
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan; Department of Surgery, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Horikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Shiwa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Kae Techigawara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan; Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takayuki Nagahashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan; Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masafumi Ishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Yuki Takeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Daizo Fukushima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Nishino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Uesugi
- Department of Pathology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Masamichi Suzuki
- Department of Pathology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Tamotsu Sugai
- Department of Pathology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao HY, Cai XF, Chen PP, Wang XB, Liu CX, Chen D, Xu J. Efficacy of linaclotide in combination with polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation in Chinese patients undergoing colonoscopy polypectomy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080723. [PMID: 39043596 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adequate bowel preparation is essential for successful colonoscopy and polypectomy procedures. However, a significant proportion of patients still exhibit suboptimal bowel preparation, ranging from 18% to 35%. The effectiveness of bowel preparation agents can be hampered by volume and taste, adversely affecting patient compliance and tolerance. Therefore, exploring strategies to minimise laxative volume and improve patient tolerance and adherence is imperative to ensure optimal bowel preparation quality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study is a two-arm, single-blinded, parallel-group randomised controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy of 2 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) combined with linaclotide with 4 L PEG in bowel cleansing. A total of 422 participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group (2 L PEG combined with 580 µg linaclotide) or the control group (4 L PEG). The primary outcome measure is bowel cleansing efficacy, which is assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Secondary outcomes include evaluating the tolerability and safety of the bowel preparation regimens, bowel diary assessments, postpolypectomy complications (such as bleeding and perforation) and the size and number of removed polyps. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has received approval from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The findings of this trial will serve as a valuable resource for clinicians and patients undergoing colonoscopy polypectomy by guiding the selection of appropriate bowel preparation regimens. Study findings will be disseminated to participants, presented at professional society meetings, and published in peer-reviewed journals. This trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with registration number ChiCTR2300075410.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Ying Zhao
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiao-Feng Cai
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ping-Ping Chen
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiao-Bin Wang
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chao-Xu Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dong Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jing Xu
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wen S, He L, Zhao X, Li Y, Lin X, Fu Z, He W, Liu T. Risk factors and prediction model for delayed bleeding after cold snare polypectomy: a retrospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:113. [PMID: 39037462 PMCID: PMC11263232 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04687-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed bleeding (DB) is a serious complication after cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for polyps in the colon. The present study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of DB after CSP and to develop a risk-scoring model for predicting DB. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted in four Chinese medical institutions. 10650 patients underwent CSP from June 2019 to May 2023. The study analyzed the rate of DB and extracted the general clinical information and polyp-related information of patients with postoperative DB. As a control, non-DB patients who received CSP at the same 4 hospitals were analyzed. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to develop the prediction model. The model was further validated using a Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) plot and risk plot. RESULTS In our study, we found a 0.24% rate of DB and the risk factors were history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, antithrombotics use, antiplatelet use, anticoagulant use, abdominal operation, sigmoid colon lesion, hematoma, cold snare defect protrusion, polyp size, wound size, the grade of wound bleeding, and morphology of Ip. These factors were incorporated into the prediction model for DB after CSP. For 1, 3, and 5 days of bleeding, the AUC of the ROC curve was 0.912, 0.939, and 0.923, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the high-risk group had a significantly higher risk of DB than the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS This study screened the risk factors and established a prediction model of DB after CSP. The results may help preventing and reducing the DB rate after CSP of colorectal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuting Wen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510000, China
| | - Long He
- Department of Digestive Endoscopy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510000, China
| | - Xiying Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510000, China
| | - Yingting Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510000, China
| | - Xiaofeng Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510000, China
| | - Zhaoli Fu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
| | - Wenfang He
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
| | - Tianwen Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ferlitsch M, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Bhandari P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Risio M, Paspatis GA, Moss A, Libânio D, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Voiosu AM, Rutter MD, Pellisé M, Moons LMG, Probst A, Awadie H, Amato A, Takeuchi Y, Repici A, Rahmi G, Koecklin HU, Albéniz E, Rockenbauer LM, Waldmann E, Messmann H, Triantafyllou K, Jover R, Gralnek IM, Dekker E, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024. Endoscopy 2024; 56:516-545. [PMID: 38670139 DOI: 10.1055/a-2304-3219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends cold snare polypectomy (CSP), to include a clear margin of normal tissue (1-2 mm) surrounding the polyp, for the removal of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 2: ESGE recommends against the use of cold biopsy forceps excision because of its high rate of incomplete resection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 3: ESGE recommends CSP, to include a clear margin of normal tissue (1-2 mm) surrounding the polyp, for the removal of small polyps (6-9 mm).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 4: ESGE recommends hot snare polypectomy for the removal of nonpedunculated adenomatous polyps of 10-19 mm in size.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 5: ESGE recommends conventional (diathermy-based) endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large (≥ 20 mm) nonpedunculated adenomatous polyps (LNPCPs).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 6: ESGE suggests that underwater EMR can be considered an alternative to conventional hot EMR for the treatment of adenomatous LNPCPs.Weak recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 7: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may also be suggested as an alternative for removal of LNPCPs of ≥ 20 mm in selected cases and in high-volume centers.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends that, after piecemeal EMR of LNPCPs by hot snare, the resection margins should be treated by thermal ablation using snare-tip soft coagulation to prevent adenoma recurrence.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 9: ESGE recommends (piecemeal) cold snare polypectomy or cold EMR for SSLs of all sizes without suspected dysplasia.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 10: ESGE recommends prophylactic endoscopic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of LNPCPs in the right colon to reduce to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 11: ESGE recommends that en bloc resection techniques, such as en bloc EMR, ESD, endoscopic intermuscular dissection, endoscopic full-thickness resection, or surgery should be the techniques of choice in cases with suspected superficial invasive carcinoma, which otherwise cannot be removed en bloc by standard polypectomy or EMR.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Ferlitsch
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelical Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Endoscopy Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS/Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Mauro Risio
- Department of Pathology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Gregorios A Paspatis
- Gastroenterology Department, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS/Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Vincente Lorenzo-Zúñiga
- Endoscopy Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital / IISLaFe, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Catholic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Andrei M Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Matthew D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leon M G Moons
- III Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Probst
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Halim Awadie
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Department, Ospedale A. Manzoni, Lecco, Italy
| | - Yoji Takeuchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Hepatogastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
- Laboratoire de Recherches Biochirurgicales, APHP-Centre Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Hugo U Koecklin
- Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
- Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN); Navarrabiomed, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Waldmann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helmut Messmann
- III Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodastrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria ISABIAL, Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kang SJ, Tae CH, Bang CS, Shin CM, Jeong YH, Choi M, Hwang JH, Saito Y, Chiu PWY, Rerknimitr R, Khor C, Khien VV, Choi KD, Shim KN, Song GA, Lee OY. [IDEN Consensus on Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy]. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY = TAEHAN SOHWAGI HAKHOE CHI 2024; 83:217-232. [PMID: 38918035 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2024.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
Antithrombotic agents, including antiplatelet agent and anticoagulants are widely used in Korea due to increasing incidence of cardio-cerebrovascular disease and aging population. The management of patients using antithrombotic agents during endoscopic procedures is an important clinical challenge. Clinical practice guideline regarding this issue which was developed by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy was published in 2020. However, since then, new evidence has emerged for the use of dual antiplatelet therapy and direct anticoagulant management, and revised guidelines were issued in the US and Europe. Accordingly, the previous guidelines were revised, cardiologists also participated in the development group, and the recommendations went through a consensus process among international experts. This guideline presents 14 recommendations made according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology, and was reviewed by multidisciplinary experts. This guideline provides useful information that can assist endoscopists in the management of patients on antithrombotic agents who require diagnostic and elective therapeutic endoscopy. It will be revised as necessary to cover changes in technology, evidence, or other aspects of clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Joo Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chung Hyun Tae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Seok Bang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Cheol Min Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Young-Hoon Jeong
- CAU Thrombosis and Biomarker Center, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong; Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Ha Hwang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Philip Wai Yan Chiu
- Division of Upper GI and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Christopher Khor
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vu Van Khien
- Departments of GI Endoscopy, 108 Central Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Kee Don Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Nam Shim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Geun Am Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Busan, Korea
| | - Oh Young Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cavassola PRP, Moura DTHD, Hirsch BS, Landim DL, Bernardo WM, Moura EGHD. HOT VERSUS COLD SNARE FOR COLORECTAL POLYPECTOMIES SIZED UP TO 10MM: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2024; 61:e23143. [PMID: 38511795 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.246102023-143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer, and prevention relies on screening programs with resection complete resection of neoplastic lesions. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the best snare polypectomy technique for colorectal lesions up to 10 mm, focusing on complete resection rate, and adverse events. METHODS A comprehensive search using electronic databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing hot versus cold snare resection for polyps sized up to 10 mm, and following PRISMA guidelines, a meta-analysis was performed. Outcomes included complete resection rate, en bloc resection rate, polypectomy, procedure times, immediate, delayed bleeding, and perforation. RESULTS Nineteen RCTs involving 8720 patients and 17588 polyps were included. Hot snare polypectomy showed a higher complete resection rate (RD, 0.02; 95%CI [+0.00,0.04]; P=0.03; I 2=63%), but also a higher rate of delayed bleeding (RD 0.00; 95%CI [0.00, 0.01]; P=0.01; I 2=0%), and severe delayed bleeding (RD 0.00; 95%CI [0.00, 0.00]; P=0.04; I 2=0%). Cold Snare was associated with shorter polypectomy time (MD -46.89 seconds; 95%CI [-62.99, -30.79]; P<0.00001; I 2=90%) and shorter total colonoscopy time (MD -7.17 minutes; 95%CI [-9.10, -5.25]; P<0.00001; I 2=41%). No significant differences were observed in en bloc resection rate or immediate bleeding. CONCLUSION Hot snare polypectomy presents a slightly higher complete resection rate, but, as it is associated with a longer procedure time and a higher rate of delayed bleeding compared to Cold Snare, it cannot be recommended as the gold standard approach. Individual analysis and personal experience should be considered when selecting the best approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Ricardo Pavanatto Cavassola
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Bruno Salomão Hirsch
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Davi Lucena Landim
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Wanderley Marques Bernardo
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kang SJ, Tae CH, Bang CS, Shin CM, Jeong YH, Choi M, Hwang JH, Saito Y, Chiu PWY, Rerknimitr R, Khor C, Khien VV, Choi KD, Shim KN, Song GA, Lee OY. International Digestive Endoscopy Network consensus on the management of antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Clin Endosc 2024; 57:141-157. [PMID: 38556472 PMCID: PMC10984749 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2024.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Antithrombotic agents, including antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, are widely used in Korea because of the increasing incidence of cardiocerebrovascular disease and the aging population. The management of patients using antithrombotic agents during endoscopic procedures is an important clinical challenge. The clinical practice guidelines for this issue, developed by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, were published in 2020. However, new evidence on the use of dual antiplatelet therapy and direct anticoagulant management has emerged, and revised guidelines have been issued in the United States and Europe. Accordingly, the previous guidelines were revised. Cardiologists were part of the group that developed the guideline, and the recommendations went through a consensus-reaching process among international experts. This guideline presents 14 recommendations made based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology and was reviewed by multidisciplinary experts. These guidelines provide useful information that can assist endoscopists in the management of patients receiving antithrombotic agents who require diagnostic and elective therapeutic endoscopy. It will be revised as necessary to cover changes in technology, evidence, or other aspects of clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Joo Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chung Hyun Tae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Seok Bang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Cheol Min Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Young-Hoon Jeong
- CAU Thrombosis and Biomarker Center, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong; Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Ha Hwang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Philip Wai Yan Chiu
- Division of Upper GI and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Christopher Khor
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vu Van Khien
- Departments of GI Endoscopy, 108 Central Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Kee Don Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Nam Shim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Geun Am Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Busan, Korea
| | - Oh Young Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- CAU Thrombosis and Biomarker Center, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong; Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Upper GI and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Departments of GI Endoscopy, 108 Central Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Busan, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kato S, Kudo SE, Minegishi Y, Miyata Y, Maeda Y, Kuroki T, Takashina Y, Mochizuki K, Tamura E, Abe M, Sato Y, Sakurai T, Kouyama Y, Tanaka K, Ogawa Y, Nakamura H, Ichimasa K, Ogata N, Hisayuki T, Hayashi T, Wakamura K, Miyachi H, Baba T, Ishida F, Nemoto T, Misawa M. Impact of computer-aided characterization for diagnosis of colorectal lesions, including sessile serrated lesions: Multireader, multicase study. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:341-350. [PMID: 37937532 DOI: 10.1111/den.14612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Computer-aided characterization (CADx) may be used to implement optical biopsy strategies into colonoscopy practice; however, its impact on endoscopic diagnosis remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the additional diagnostic value of CADx when used by endoscopists for assessing colorectal polyps. METHODS This was a single-center, multicase, multireader, image-reading study using randomly extracted images of pathologically confirmed polyps resected between July 2021 and January 2022. Approved CADx that could predict two-tier classification (neoplastic or nonneoplastic) by analyzing narrow-band images of the polyps was used to obtain a CADx diagnosis. Participating endoscopists determined if the polyps were neoplastic or not and noted their confidence level using a computer-based, image-reading test. The test was conducted twice with a 4-week interval: the first test was conducted without CADx prediction and the second test with CADx prediction. Diagnostic performances for neoplasms were calculated using the pathological diagnosis as reference and performances with and without CADx prediction were compared. RESULTS Five hundred polyps were randomly extracted from 385 patients and diagnosed by 14 endoscopists (including seven experts). The sensitivity for neoplasia was significantly improved by referring to CADx (89.4% vs. 95.6%). CADx also had incremental effects on the negative predictive value (69.3% vs. 84.3%), overall accuracy (87.2% vs. 91.8%), and high-confidence diagnosis rate (77.4% vs. 85.8%). However, there was no significant difference in specificity (80.1% vs. 78.9%). CONCLUSIONS Computer-aided characterization has added diagnostic value for differentiating colorectal neoplasms and may improve the high-confidence diagnosis rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shun Kato
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shin-Ei Kudo
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yosuke Minegishi
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuki Miyata
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yasuharu Maeda
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takanori Kuroki
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuki Takashina
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kenichi Mochizuki
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Eri Tamura
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masahiro Abe
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuta Sato
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sakurai
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuta Kouyama
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kenta Tanaka
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yushi Ogawa
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroki Nakamura
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Katsuro Ichimasa
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Noriyuki Ogata
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Hisayuki
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takemasa Hayashi
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kunihiko Wakamura
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Miyachi
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Baba
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Fumio Ishida
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Nemoto
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masashi Misawa
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Taghiakbari M, Anderson JC, von Renteln D, Hirschmann S, Jobse B, Pohl H. Extent of normal polyp resection margin: a possible quality measure for polyp resection. Gut 2024; 73:216-218. [PMID: 38050099 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mahsa Taghiakbari
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CHUM), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Department of Gastroenterology, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA
- Medicine, Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Division of Gastroenterology Medicine, Depertment of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de L'Universite de Montreal (CHUM), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Scott Hirschmann
- Department of Pathology, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA
| | - Bruce Jobse
- Department of Research, VA Medical Center, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Holme Ø. Are we ready for the cold snare revolution? Endoscopy 2023; 55:938-939. [PMID: 36827990 DOI: 10.1055/a-2025-0997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Øyvind Holme
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Sorlandet Hospital, Department of Medicine, Kristiansand, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Niu C, Bapaye J, Zhang J, Liu H, Zhu K, Farooq U, Zahid S, Chathuranga D, Okolo PI. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cold snare polypectomy and hot snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:1458-1467. [PMID: 37539860 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has become increasingly utilized to resect colorectal polyps, given its efficacy and safety. This study aims to compare CSP and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting small (< 10 mm) and large (10-20 mm) colorectal lesions. METHODS Relevant publications were obtained from Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. The publication search was limited by English-language and human studies. Pooled mean difference and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for outcomes of interest. RESULTS Twenty-three studies were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled OR of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) in the CSP group versus the HSP group was 0.29 (P = 0.0001, I2 = 29%). Subgroup analysis according to lesion size showed a significant reduction in the DPPB rate in lesion sizes 10-20 mm (pooled OR 0.08, P = 0.003, I2 = 0%) and < 10 mm (pooled OR 0.35, P = 0.001, I2 = 27%). Pooled OR of major bleeding in the CSP group was 0.23 (P = 0.0004, I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis by lesion size revealed a significant decrease in the rate of major bleeding in the CSP group for both lesion sizes 10-20 mm (pooled OR 0.11, P = 0.04) and < 10 mm (pooled OR 0.26, P = 0.003). Complete resection, en bloc resection, and recurrence rate were comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Cold snare polypectomy was associated with a lower rate of DPPB and lower risk of major bleeding compared with HSP in both small and large polyps. CSP should be considered as the polypectomy technique of choice for colorectal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengu Niu
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Jay Bapaye
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Jing Zhang
- Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Hongli Liu
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Kaiwen Zhu
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Umer Farooq
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Salman Zahid
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Dileepa Chathuranga
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Patrick I Okolo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Capogreco A, Alfarone L, Massimi D, Repici A. Cold resection for colorectal polyps: where we are and where we are going? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:719-730. [PMID: 37318101 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2223976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic resection of colonic precancerous lesions has been demonstrated to significantly decrease colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Among resection techniques, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has been shown as a highly feasible, effective and safe option and is widely used in clinical practice, being regarded as the first-line technique for removal of small and diminutive colorectal polyps. On the other hand, conventional hot snare polypectomy (HSP) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), namely the gold standard treatments for larger polyps, may be occasionally associated to complications due to electrocautery injury. AREAS COVERED To overcome these shortcomings of electrocautery-based resection techniques, in the last few years CSP has been increasingly assessed as a treatment option for additional indications, with a focus on nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥10 mm. EXPERT OPINION This review aims to present current and widened indications of CSP discussing the latest findings from the most remarkable studies, with an insight into technical issues, novelties and potential advances in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Capogreco
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Ludovico Alfarone
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
- Department of biomedical scienses, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Massimi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of biomedical scienses, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ulrich JD, Rechberger P, Bachmann J, Herner A, V Figura G, Lahmer T, Phillip V, Mayr U, Haller B, Jesinghaus M, Schmid RM, Abdelhafez M, Schlag C. Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy of Colorectal Polyps 10-15 mm with a Hybrid Snare: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study. Digestion 2023; 104:391-399. [PMID: 37331350 DOI: 10.1159/000530642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe and effective procedure for small colorectal polyps ≤9 mm. There are only limited data regarding CSP of larger neoplastic lesions. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of CSP for polyps between 10 and 15 mm in size. METHODS In this prospective single-arm observational pilot study, patients with a least one polyp 10-15 mm were included. These polyps were preferably removed by CSP using a dedicated hybrid snare. The primary outcome was the histological complete resection rate (CRR) determined by pathologically negative margins of the specimen and no neoplastic tissue obtained from biopsies of the resection site margin. Secondary outcomes were en bloc resection rate, failure of CSP, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS A total of 61 neoplastic polyps were removed from 39 patients. Overall CRR was 80.3% (49/61). CSP was feasible in 78.7% (48/61) of polyps and the CRR in this group was 85.4% (41/48). When CSP failed (13/61; 21.3%), lesions were successfully resected by immediate HSP using the same snare with a CRR of 61.5% (8/13) in this group. One patient presented delayed hemorrhage after HSP of a polyp but successful hemostasis was achieved with two hemoclips. No other adverse events occurred. No recurrence was seen on follow-up colonoscopy in cases with incomplete resected polyps. CONCLUSION CSP seems to be efficient and safe in removing colorectal polyps up to 15 mm. A hybrid snare seems to be particularly advantageous for these polyps as it allows immediate conversion to HSP if CSP might fail in larger polyps. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04464837).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg D Ulrich
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany,
| | - Paul Rechberger
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jeannine Bachmann
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Herner
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guido V Figura
- Private Practice for Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Lahmer
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Veit Phillip
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrich Mayr
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Haller
- Institute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Jesinghaus
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Roland M Schmid
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Mohamed Abdelhafez
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Schlag
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu W, Gong J, Gu L. The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:136. [PMID: 37204495 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04429-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal technique for removing small colorectal polyps ranging from 5 to 10 mm in size remains uncertain. In order to compare the efficacy and adverse events between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for removing small polyps, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from 1998 to May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting small colorectal polyps. The primary outcome measure was the incomplete resection rate (IRR). RESULTS Seven studies that met our study criteria, with a total of 3178 included polyps, were included in our analysis. The incomplete resection rate (IRR) was found to be significantly higher in the CSP group compared to the HSP group (risk ratio [RR] 1.57 [1.17-2.11], P = 0.003). Although the CSP group had a higher local recurrence rate than the HSP group, the difference was not statistically significant (RR: 3.98 [0.66-23.84], P = 0.13). The polyp retrieval rates were not significantly different between the two groups (RR: 1.00 [0.99-1], P = 0.22). Perforation was not reported or mentioned in any of the seven studies. The overall immediate bleeding rate was significantly higher in the CSP group than the HSP group (RR: 2.26 [1.63-3.14], P < 0.001), but immediate postpolypectomy bleeding requiring additional intervention was similar between the groups (RR: 1.08 [0.54-2.17], P = 0.82). The delayed bleeding rate (RR: 0.83 [0.45-1.55], P = 0.56) and specific polypectomy time (RR: -0.46 [-1.05-0.12], P = 0.12) were also similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS The meta-analysis shows a significantly higher IRR for CSP compared with HSP when removing small polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wentao Liu
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Gong
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Gu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Winston K, Maulahela H, Raharjo DE, Tjoa K, Jonlean R. A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Hot Snare Polypectomy and Cold Snare Polypectomy for Removing Small Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2023; 15:e38713. [PMID: 37292560 PMCID: PMC10246601 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Both cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) have been shown to be effective methods for removing small colorectal polyps, but the optimal method for achieving complete resection remains unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic search of relevant articles using databases such as PubMed, ProQuest, and EBSCOhost. The search criteria included randomized controlled trials that compared CSP and HSP for small colorectal polyps ≤10 mm and the articles were screened based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were analyzed using RevMan software (version 5.4; Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom), and meta-analysis was performed with outcomes measured using pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Mantel-Haenszel random effect model was used to calculate the OR. We selected a total of 14 randomized controlled trials involving 11601 polyps for analysis. Pooled analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the incomplete resection rate between CSP and HSP (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.88-1.73, p-value: 0.27; I2: 51%), en bloc resection rate (OR: 0.66; 95%CI: 0.38-1.13; p: 0.13; I2: 60%), and polyp retrieval rate (OR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.59-1.57; p: 0.89; I2: 17%). For safety endpoints, there is no statistically significant difference in intraprocedural bleeding rate between CSP and HSP per patient analysis (OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 0.74-7.54; p: 0.95; I2: 74%) and per polyp basis (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 0.72-4.72; p: 0.20; I2: 85%). CSP had lower OR for the delayed bleeding outcome when compared with the HSP group per patient basis (OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.2-0.86; p: 0.02; I2: 25%), but not in the per polyp analysis (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.12-3; p: 0.53; I2: 0%). Total polypectomy time was significantly shorter in the CSP group (mean difference: -0.81 minutes; 95% CI: -0.96, -0.66; p:<0.00001; I2: 0%). Thus, CSP is both an efficacious and safe method for removing small colorectal polyps. Therefore, it can be recommended as a suitable alternative to HSP for the removal of small colorectal polyps. However, more studies are necessary to evaluate any long-term differences between the two methods such as polyp recurrence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Winston
- Hospital Medicine, Bhakti Medicare Hospital, Sukabumi, IDN
| | - Hasan Maulahela
- Gastroenterology, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, IDN
| | | | - Kevin Tjoa
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IDN
| | - Reganedgary Jonlean
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, IDN
- Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Tzu Chi Hospital, Jakarta, IDN
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Li X, Zhu H, Li F, Li R, Xu H. Different endoscopic treatments for small colorectal polyps: A systematic review, pair-wise, and network meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1154411. [PMID: 37089613 PMCID: PMC10117900 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1154411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims In recent years, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has been increasingly used for small polyps (<10 mm) instead of hot snare polypectomy (HSP). However, evidence-based research regarding the effectiveness and safety of CSP and HSP are still lacking. Additionally, for 4-10 -mm non-pedunculated polyps, the polyp removal method is still controversial. Therefore, it is clinically significant to conduct pair-wise and network meta-analyses to assess such resection methods. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only studies that involved the resection of polyps <10 mm were included. Outcomes included the complete resection rate, polyp retrieval rate, procedure-related complications, and procedure times. Results Overall, 23 RCTs (5,352 patients) were identified. In meta-analysis compared CSP versus HSP for polyps <10 mm, CSP showed lower complete resection rate than HSP although with no statistically significant difference [odds ratio (OR): 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-1.06]. CSP showed a lower risk of major post-polypectomy complications compared to HSP (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.11-0.73). In the network meta-analysis for 4-10 mm non-pedunculated polyps, HSP, and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) showed a higher complete resection rate than CSP (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.3-9.2 vs. OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.0-10) but a significantly longer time than CSP (WMD: 16.55 s, 95% CI [7.48 s, 25.25 s], p < 0.001), (WMD: 48.00 s, 95% CI [16.54 s, 79.46 s], p = 0.003). Underwater CSP ranked third for complete resection with no complications. Conclusion For <10 mm polyps, CSP is safer than HSP, especially for patients taking antithrombotic drugs. For 4-10 mm non-pedunculated polyps, HSP, and EMR have higher complete resection rates than CSP. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022315575.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuanhan Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - He Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Fudong Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Ri Li
- Department of Library, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Hong Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Xu JH, Gao P, Zhou M, Gao S, Dong ZQ, Shen YC, Zhang QS. Clip-assisted endoloop ligation of the mucosal defect after resection of colorectal polyps decreased postprocedural delayed bleeding. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221131132. [PMID: 36406056 PMCID: PMC9669683 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221131132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postprocedural delayed bleeding (PDB) remains the most common major complication of colorectal polypectomy. Incomplete clip closure of mucosal defect and unclosed injured blood vessels in gaps between clips may be the risk factors for PDB. OBJECTIVES To observe whether completely no-gap closure of mucosal defect after polypectomy can reduce PDB occurrence. DESIGN Single-center, retrospective case-control study. METHODS In this study based on historical comparisons of patients in 2 time periods, only the patients with polyps sized between 6 and 15 mm were included. A new clip-assisted endoloop ligation (CAEL, treatment group) method was used between January 2019 and December 2020, and a traditional simple clip closure (SCC, control) was used Between January 2017 and December 2018 to prevent PDB after polypectomy. The rate of PDB of two groups and risk factors for PDB were evaluated. RESULTS Totally 4560 patients were included in the study; 2418 patients belong to CAEL group, and 2142 patients belong to SCC group. The overall rate of PDB was significantly lower in CAEL group compared to SCC group (0.6% versus 1.5%, p < 0.00). On multivariate logistic analysis, CAEL was a significant independent preventive factor for PDB (odds ratio (OR), 0.092; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.029-0.3335; p = 0.000). Polyps located at rectum (colon versus rectum) represented a significant independent risk factor for PDB (OR, 11.888; 95% CI, 3.343-42.269; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION Completely no-gap closure of mucosal defect after polypectomy further reduced the rate of PDB for polyps sized between 6 and 15 mm. CAEL may be a significant independent preventive factor for PDB. Polyps located at the rectum may be a significant independent risk factor for PDB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-hua Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Fourth
People’s Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Peng Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Fourth
People’s Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Fourth
People’s Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuang Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Fourth
People’s Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-qi Dong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Fourth
People’s Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu-cui Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Fourth
People’s Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Seewald S, Ang TL. The "Cold Revolution" - cold snare resection of sessile colorectal polyps. Endoscopy 2022; 54:970-971. [PMID: 35595505 DOI: 10.1055/a-1823-0937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Seewald
- Centre of Gastroenterology, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tiing Leong Ang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, SingHealth, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|