Low von Willebrand Disease: A Bleeding Disorder of Unknown Cause?

Low von Willebrand factor-unraveling an enigma wrapped in a conundrum

The 2021 ASH ISTH NHF WFH guidelines recommendation that patients with von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels of 30 to 50 IU/dL and an increased bleeding phenotype be categorized as type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) rather than Low VWF has proved controversial. However, in support of that decision, recent data have demonstrated that individuals with partial quantitative VWF deficiency exhibit an age-dependent evolving phenotype and confirmed that Low VWF represents a subgroup within heterogeneous type 1 VWD. Nonetheless, type 1 VWD heterogeneity continues to pose significant diagnostic challenges. In this Forum article, we address outstanding issues critical to preventing the inappropriate overdiagnosis of type 1 VWD while maximizing access to healthcare and minimizing diagnostic delays. In addition, we propose an algorithm for type 1 VWD diagnosis. This algorithm pays special attention to individuals with plasma VWF levels in the 30 to 50 IU/dL range who have no or minimal bleeding history and have not yet been exposed to significant hemostatic challenges.

Unravelling the spectrum of von Willebrand factor variants in quantitative von Willebrand disease: results from a German cohort study

BACKGROUND

Von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most prevalent hereditary bleeding disorder, results from deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF).

OBJECTIVES

This large cohort study aims to offer a comprehensive exploration of mutation spectra and laboratory features in quantitative VWF deficiencies, shedding light on genetic underpinnings and genotype-phenotype associations.

METHODS

Our cohort consisted of 221 Caucasian index patients with quantitative VWD, along with 47 individuals whose plasma VWF levels fell within the lower normal boundaries (50-70 IU/dL). We conducted comprehensive VWF assays and genetic analyses, encompassing VWF gene sequencing, copy number variation investigations, and bioinformatic assessments.

RESULTS

Following International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-Scientific and Standardization Committee VWF guidelines, 77 index patients were characterized as having type 1 VWD (VWF antigen [VWF:Ag] < 30 IU/dL), 111 as having type 1 VWD (VWF:Ag, 30-50 IU/dL), and 33 as having type 3 VWD. Mutation detection rates were 88%, 65%, and 92%, respectively. Notably, blood group O overrepresentation was evident in type 1 with VWF:Ag of 30 to 50 IU/dL, particularly among mutation-negative patients, suggesting a potential causal role of blood group O. A total of 223 VWF variants, comprising 147 distinct variations, were identified in quantitative VWD patients, of which 57 were novel variants (39%). Additionally, approximately 70% of individuals with VWF levels within the lower normal boundaries (50-70 IU/dL) displayed VWF variants.

CONCLUSION

Our data advance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying quantitative VWD, offering valuable insights for future research and clinical management. Distinct mutation patterns were observed among subgroups, particularly the contrast between type 1 VWD (VWF:Ag < 30 IU/dL) and type 1 VWD (VWF:Ag, 30-50 IU/dL), an area with limited prior investigation.

Type 1 VWD classification revisited: novel insights from combined analysis of the LoVIC and WiN studies

ABSTRACT

There is significant ongoing debate regarding type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) defintion. Previous guidelines recommended patients with von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels <30 IU/dL be diagnosed type 1 VWD, whereas patients with significant bleeding and VWF levels from 30 to 50 IU/dL be diagnosed with low VWF. To elucidate the relationship between type 1 VWD and low VWF in the context of age-induced increases in VWF levels, we combined data sets from 2 national cohort studies: 162 patients with low VWF from the Low VWF in Ireland Cohort (LoVIC) and 403 patients with type 1 VWD from the Willebrand in The Netherlands (WiN) studies. In 47% of type 1 VWD participants, VWF levels remained <30 IU/dL despite increasing age. Conversely, VWF levels increased to the low VWF range (30-50 IU/dL) in 30% and normalized (>50 IU/dL) in 23% of type 1 VWD cases. Crucially, absolute VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) levels and increase of VWF:Ag per year overlapped between low VWF and normalized type 1 VWD participants. Moreover, multiple regression analysis demonstrated that VWF:Ag levels in low VWF and normalized type 1 VWD patients would not have been different had they been diagnosed at the same age (β = 0.00; 95% confidence interval, -0.03 to 0.04). Consistently, no difference was found in the prevalence of VWF sequence variants; factor VIII activity/VWF:Ag or VWF propeptide/VWF:Ag ratios; or desmopressin responses between low VWF and normalized type 1 VWD patients. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that low VWF does not constitute a discrete clinical or pathological entity. Rather, it is part of an age-dependent type 1 VWD evolving phenotype. Collectively, these data have important implications for future VWD classification criteria.

Investigating patients for bleeding disorders when most of the "usual" ones have been ruled out

A State of the Art lecture titled "Investigating Patients for Bleeding Disorders When Most of the Usual Ones Have Been Ruled Out" was presented at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress in 2023. Mild to moderate bleeding disorders (MBDs) in patients in whom no diagnosis of an established disorder, such as platelet function defect, von Willebrand disease, or a coagulation factor deficiency, can be identified are classified as bleeding disorders of unknown cause (BDUCs). Prospective data from the Vienna Bleeding Biobank and other studies have revealed a high proportion of BDUCs of up to 70% among patients with MBD who have a similar bleeding phenotype as other MBDs. As BDUC is a diagnosis of exclusion, the accuracy of the diagnostic workup is essential. For example, repeated testing for von Willebrand disease should be considered if von Willebrand factor values are <80 IU/dL. Current evidence does not support the clinical use of global assays such as thromboelastography, platelet function analyzer, or thrombin generation potential. Rare and novel bleeding disorders due to genetic variants in fibrinolytic factors or natural anticoagulants are rare and should only be analyzed in patients with specific phenotypes and a clear family history. In BDUC, blood group O was identified as a risk factor for increased bleeding severity and bleeding risk after hemostatic challenges. Future studies should improve the phenotypical characterization and ideally identify novel risk factors in BDUC, as a multifactorial pathogenesis is suspected. Finally, we summarize relevant new data on this topic presented during the 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress.