Influence of trivalent chromium on the beta-cell function

Dietary chromium decreases insulin resistance in rats fed a high-fat, mineral-imbalanced diet

The effects of chromium (Cr) supplementation on diet-induced insulin resistance produced by feeding a high-fat, low-Cr diet were studied in rats to ascertain the role of Cr in insulin resistance. Wistar male rats were maintained for 16 weeks after weaning on a basal diet containing 40% lard, 30% sucrose, and 25% casein by weight and adequate vitamins and minerals without added Cr (-Cr). Fasting levels of insulin, glucose, and triglycerides and the responses during an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) were compared as indices of insulin resistance and the effectiveness of dietary Cr. IVGTTs and blood sampling for data analyses were performed over a 40-minute period after IV glucose injection (1.25 g/kg body weight) in overnight-fasted animals under pentobarbital anesthesia (40 mg/kg body weight). All animals were normoglycemic (-Cr, 109 +/- 3 mg/dL; +Cr, 119 +/- 5), with fasting insulin levels elevated in the -Cr group (65 +/- 10 microU/mL) versus the +Cr group (31 +/- 4 microU/mL). Increases in plasma triglycerides in the -Cr group were not significant. Following glucose injection, the rate of glucose clearance was lower in the -Cr group (1.74 +/- 0.22 v2.39 +/- 0.11%/min), and 40-minute glucose areas in the -Cr group tended to be higher than in the +Cr group. The insulin response to glucose injection was 20% higher in the -Cr group. Forty-minute plasma triglyceride areas were lower in +Cr rats (875 +/- 62 v 1,143 +/- 97 mg/dL.min in -Cr rats). These data demonstrate that the insulin resistance induced by feeding a high-fat, nutrient-stressed diet is improved by Cr.

Chromium improves insulin response to glucose in rats

The effects of chromium (Cr) supplementation on insulin secretion and glucose clearance (KG) during intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTS) were assessed in rats with impaired glucose tolerance due to dietary Cr deficiency. Male Wistar rats were maintained after weaning on a basal low-Cr diet containing 55% sucrose, 15% lard, 25% casein. American Institute of Nutrition (AIN)-recommended levels of vitamins, no added Cr, and an altered mineral content as required to produce Cr deficiency and impaired glucose tolerance. The Cr-supplemented group ([+Cr] n = 6) were provided with 5 ppm Cr as CrCl3 in the drinking water, and the Cr-deficient group ([-Cr]n = 5) received purified drinking water. At 12 weeks on the diet, both groups of rats were hyperinsulinemic (+Cr, 103 +/- 13; -Cr, 59 +/- 12 microU/mL) and normoglycemic (+Cr, 127 +/- 7; -Cr, 130 +/- 4 mg/dL), indicating insulin resistance. After 24 weeks, insulin levels were normal (+Cr, 19 +/- 5; -Cr, 21 +/- 3 microU/mL) and all rats remained normoglycemic (+Cr, 124 +/- 8; -Cr, 131 +/- 6 mg/dL). KG values during IVGTTS were lower in -Cr rats (KG = 3.58%/min) than in +Cr rats (KG = 5.29%/min), correlating with significantly greater 40-minute glucose areas in the -Cr group (P < .01). Comparisons of 40-minute insulin areas indicated marked insulin hyperresponsiveness in the -Cr group, with insulin-secretory responses increased nearly twofold in -Cr animals (P < .05). Chromium deficiency also led to significant decreases in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity in spleen and testis (P < .01). In these studies, Cr deficiency was characterized by both beta-cell hypersecretion of insulin and tissue insulin resistance that were associated with decreased tissue levels of cAMP PDE activity.

Natural products and the athlete: facts and folklore

OBJECTIVE

To contrast scientific facts with suggested manufacturers' claims regarding food supplements (natural products) marketed for enhanced athletic prowess.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was performed to obtain documentation supporting the claims of natural-product manufacturers. In addition, several references pertaining to pharmacognosy, natural products, herbs, pharmacy practice, and sports medicine were reviewed. Claims were obtained from promotional advertisements in bodybuilding magazines, product labels, and fact sheets for sales representatives in nutrition and health-food stores.

DATA EXTRACTION

We reviewed all of the clinical trials, published between 1966 and 1992, relative to the manufacturers' claims regarding these products.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pertinent human and/or animal studies supporting each natural product were compared with the manufacturers' claims.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that there was no published scientific evidence to support the promotional claims for a large proportion of the products (8/19, 42 percent). Only 4 of 19 products (21 percent) were associated with any documented human clinical trials supporting their promotional claims. Six of 19 agents (32 percent) had some scientific documentation to support their promotional claims; however, these products were judged to be marketed in a misleading manner.