An overview of optimal endovascular strategy in treating the femoropopliteal artery: mechanical, biological, and procedural factors

Revisiting SFA stent technology: an updated overview on mechanical stent performance

OBJECTIVES

The study investigated mechanical parameters of stent systems indicated for treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) arterial disease to support interpretation of clinical results and the related causalities.

METHODS

Eight stent system types of same dimensions were investigated (n=2). Parameters were the profile of stent delivery system (SDS), radiopacity, trackability and pushability, bending stiffness (flexibility) and axial stiffness of expanded stents, length change during expansion, radial force, crush resistance, strut thickness and general surface condition.

RESULTS

The trackability ranged from 0.237 to 0.920 N and the pushability was 47.9-67.6 %. The bending stiffness of SDS was between 108.42 and 412.68 N mm2. The length change during stent release to 5 mm was low, with one exception. The bending stiffness of the expanded stents was 2.73-41.67 N mm2. The normalized radial forces at 5 mm diameter ranged from 0.133 N/mm to 0.503 N/mm. During non-radial compression by 50 %, the forces were 3.07-8.42 N, with one exception (58.7 N). The strut thickness was 153-231 µm.

CONCLUSIONS

Large differences occurred for flexibility, radial force and length change during expansion. The data should be used when choosing the proper device for restoring vascular function.

A novel endovascular method of atherectomy for calcified common femoral and popliteal disease using the crosser system: Crossbow and Rambow techniques

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to report the efficacy and safety of new atherectomy methods using the Crosser system for calcified lesions in the common femoral and popliteal artery: the Crosser system supported by bended 0.014 wire (Crossbow) technique and retrograde approach of sheathless Crosser system supported by bended 0.014 wire (Rambow) technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This report describes a single-center, retrospective study. A total of 23 patients (mean ± SD age, 73 ± 10 years; 19 men) with symptomatic peripheral artery disease received the Crossbow technique and Rambow technique for treatment of calcified common femoral and popliteal disease; these patients were enrolled between October 2013 and October 2015. The primary efficacy outcome was acute technical success, defined as achievement of residual stenosis < 30% for stenting and < 50% for angioplasty or atherectomy. The primary safety outcome was assessed on the basis of angiographic complications.

RESULTS

The Crossbow and Rambow techniques were undertaken in 100% and 17% of the patients, respectively. Acute technical success was achieved in 96% of the patients. There were two embolic events.

CONCLUSION

Crossbow and Rambow techniques could be effective atherectomy methods of calcified common femoral and popliteal disease. Regarding safety, embolic protection devices may be needed for our atherectomy methods.

Prospective, Multicenter Study of Rotational Atherectomy with Antirestenotic Therapy for Infrainguinal Arterial Disease

BACKGROUND

Thrombi are common in steno-occlusive lesions of infrainguinal atherosclerotic diseases. Despite the easy passage of guidewires through these lesions, conventional ballooning or stenting cannot effectively treat them, and patients are at risk of distal embolization. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of using a rotational aspiration atherectomy system to treat infrainguinal atherosclerotic disease.

METHODS

Patients underwent revascularization of target lesions using the Jetstream™ Atherectomy System. The primary endpoint was the freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) 12-month after the procedure. Outcomes were evaluated according to the clinical severity, lesion type, use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs), and lesion length, characteristics, and sites. Survival analysis for CD-TLR over time was plotted. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22 (IBM; Armonk, NY, USA). P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In total, 150 patients (91.2% male; mean age, 69.8 years; 66.2% with diabetes) with de novo or restenotic infrainguinal lesions were enrolled. The mean lesion length was 17.2 cm, 75.0% were occlusive, and 38.2% had severe calcification. The lesion types were sclerotic (64.7%), thrombosclerotic (20.6%), thrombotic (8.8%), and in-stent (5.9%). Adjunctive DCB was used in 86.8% of patients. The 12-month primary patency rate (PPR) and CD-TLR rates were 81.6% and 90.1%, respectively. The 12-month CD-TLR rate was significantly better in the sclerotic and thrombosclerotic groups than in the thrombotic group (100% and 100% vs. 66.7%; P = 0.001). The 12-month PPR was significant better in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) A and B groups than TASC C and D groups (P = 0.02). The 12-month PPR is significantly better after using a DCB or stent placement than after using a simple balloon (P = 0.01). There were no major adverse events, including procedure-related death, myocardial infarction, or major amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the Jetstream atherectomy device for complex infrainguinal lesions. This system functions optimally with TASC A/B lesions and sclerotic or thrombosclerotic lesions.

Endovascular Treatment and Outcomes for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: Insights from the XLPAD Registry

Background

There is limited “real-world” evidence examining treatment modalities and outcomes in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease undergoing endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Materials and Methods

We compared outcomes in 2,895 patients from the XLPAD registry (NCT01904851) between 2006 and 2019 treated for FP ISR (n = 347) and non-ISR (n = 2,548) lesions. Primary endpoint included major adverse limb events (MALE) at 1 year, a composite of all-cause death, target limb repeat revascularization, or major amputation.

Results

ISR patients were more frequently on antiplatelet (94.5% vs 89.4%, p=0.007) and statin (68.9% vs 60.3%, p=0.003) therapies. Lesion length was similar (ISR: 145 ± 99 mm vs. non-ISR: 142 ± 99 mm, p=0.55). Fewer treated ISR lesions were chronic total occlusions (47.3% vs. 53.7%, p=0.02) and severely calcified (22.4% vs. 44.7%, p < 0.001). Atherectomy (63.5% vs. 45.0%, p < 0.001) and drug-coated balloons (DCB; 4.7% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001) were more frequently used in ISR lesions. The distal embolization rate was higher in ISR lesions (2.4% vs. 0.9%, p=0.02). Repeat revascularization (21.5% vs. 16.7%, p=0.04; Figure) was higher and freedom from MALE at 1 year was significantly lower (87% vs. 92.5%, p < 0.001) in the ISR group.

Conclusion

Atherectomy and DCB are more frequently used to treat FP ISR lesions. Patients with FP ISR have more intraprocedural distal embolization, higher repeat revascularization procedures, and lower freedom from MALE at 1 year.

Assessment of Sirolimus- vs. paCLitaxEl-coated balloon angioPlasty In atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesiOnS (ASCLEPIOS Study): preliminary results

BACKGROUND

There appears to be an association between paclitaxel-coated devices and increased 5-year all-cause mortality.

METHODS

We are conducting a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center, noninferiority study. All consecutive patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease who fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria are sequentially and consecutively assigned to either paclitaxel (Ranger, Boston Scientific) or sirolimus (MagicTouch, Concept Medical) coated balloon angioplasty treatment. The primary outcome are procedural success and primary vessel patency at index procedure. The secondary outcomes are 30-day and 12-month freedom from MAEs (amputation, death, TLR/TVR, MI, distal embolization that requires a separate intervention or hospitalization), procedural success (≤30% residual diameter stenosis or occlusion after the procedure), Rutherford category improvement (reduction ≤1 category) and ABI improvement (increase ≥0.10 from baseline).

RESULTS

A total of six patients have been enrolled in the present study up to now. The mean age was 72.6 years old and five were male. All patients had angiographic evidence of isolated occlusion in the transition segment of the distal femoral superficial artery in the popliteal artery. The mean length was 109 mm. Three patients were treated by sirolimus-coated (group A) and three by paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty (group B). The primary patency and procedural success was in two of three and three of three patients, for group A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results show safety and feasibility of the Sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty. Further investigation and increase of sample size will allow for more sustained conclusions regarding patency and procedural success of this type of balloons for the endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Rotational Atherectomy in Japanese Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease Presenting Femoropopliteal Lesions: The J-SUPREME and J-SUPREME II Trials

PURPOSE

The purpose of the J-SUPREME (J-S) and J-SUPREME II (J-SII) trials was to evaluate the performance of the Jetstream Atherectomy System for the treatment of Japanese patients with symptomatic occlusive atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The J-S and J-SII trials were both prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trials. Patients in J-S underwent Jetstream atherectomy followed by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), whereas those in J-SII had adjunctive drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment following atherectomy. Patients were adults with Rutherford category 2, 3, or 4 and had stenotic, restenotic, or occlusive lesion(s) with a degree of stenosis ≥70 in the superficial femoral artery and/or proximal popliteal artery. In J-S, lesions were required to be calcified, and in J-SII lesions were required to be severely calcified.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were enrolled in J-S (mean age 72.3±8.7 years, lesion length 82.0±41.5 mm, 36% calcification PACSS Grade 3, 22% Grade 4) and 31 patients in J-SII (mean age 72.5±7.7 years, lesion length 122.6±55.6 mm, 19.4% calcification PACSS Grade 3, 77.4% Grade 4). No bailout stenting or bypass conversions were required. No major adverse events (MAEs) were reported for either trial through 1 month. The 6-month primary patency for J-S, with PTA alone following atherectomy, was 40.4% (19/47). The 6-month primary patency for J-SII, with DCB treatment following atherectomy, was 96.7% (29/30). At 6-month post-procedure, 79.2% (38/48) of patients in J-S, and 100% (30/30) of patients in J-SII had improved by at least 1 Rutherford category.

CONCLUSION

J-SUPREME trial results demonstrate procedural safety and efficacy of the Jetstream Atherectomy System and J-SII showed sustained patency through 6 months following combination treatment with Jetstream atherectomy and DCB.

Atherectomy with balloon angioplasty compared to balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of chronic limb threatening ischemia: A national surgical quality improvement program database analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare perioperative outcomes related to atherectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty alone for the treatment of lower extremity chronic limb threatening ischemia using a national patient database.

METHODS

Patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia treated with atherectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty alone from 2011 to 2016 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were identified. Primary outcomes were major adverse limb events (30-day untreated loss of patency, major reintervention, major amputation) and major adverse cardiac events (cardiac arrest, composite outcome of myocardial infarction or stroke). Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, length of stay, and any unplanned readmission within 30 days. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of outcome. Propensity score matched cohort analysis was performed. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Subgroup analyses of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal interventions were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 2636 (77.2%) patients were treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and 778 (22.8%) were treated with atherectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Multivariate analyses of the unadjusted cohort revealed no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events or major adverse limb events between the two groups (p-value >0.05). Subgroup analysis of femoropopliteal interventions demonstrated a significantly decreased likelihood of untreated loss of patency in 30 days in the atherectomy group compared to the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group (1.1% vs. 2.7%, respectively; p-value = 0.034), which persisted on propensity score matched analysis (1.1% vs. 3.1%, respectively; p-value = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Atherectomy with balloon angioplasty of femoropopliteal disease provides a significant decrease in untreated loss of patency compared to balloon angioplasty alone.

Drug-eluting balloon treatment in femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis of different lengths

Background

In this study, we present one-year results of drugeluting balloon treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.

Methods

A total of 62 patients (48 males, 14 females; mean age 64.2±9.1 years; range, 54 to 81 years) who underwent drugeluting balloon stenting for femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis between August 2013 and October 2017 were included in the study. The patients were classified into three groups based on the narrowing length of stenosis in the stents. Group/Class 1 (n=17): narrowing <1/2 of the stent length; Group/Class 2 (n=22): narrowing >1/2 of the stent length, not totally occluded; and Group/Class 3 (n=23): totally occluded. In-stent restenosis was treated with drug-eluting balloon treatment.

Results

There was a significant difference among all classes in terms of in-stent restenosis. The length of stenosis was a predictor for in-stent restenosis. The mean stent length was 107.7±24.6 mm in Group 1, 164.6±17.9 mm in Group 2, and 180±19.3 mm in Group 3. For non-occluded in-stent restenosis, restenosis rate at one year after balloon angioplasty was 47.1% in Group 1, 86.4% in Group 2, and 95.7% in Group 3. Femoropopliteal bypass was performed in five patients in whom treatment failed. None of the patients required amputation.

Conclusion

The length of in-stent restenosis in the femoropopliteal arterial stents is an important predictor for recurrent stenosis, when re-flow is achieved with drug-eluting balloons.

Safety, effectiveness and mid-term follow-up in 136 consecutive patients with moderate to severely calcified lesions undergoing phoenix atherectomy

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of the Phoenix atherectomy device for the treatment of complex and calcified lesions in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). 136 consecutive all-comer patients with chronic PAD underwent Phoenix atherectomy. Safety in terms of vessel injury and embolism, efficacy and clinical success in terms of ≥ 1Rutherford class (RF) improvement during follow-up were systematically analyzed. Lesion calcification was categorized by the Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS), whereas lesion complexity was classified by the Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). 151 lesions were treated in 136 consecutive patients. Clinical follow-up was available at 10.3 ± 4.2 months in 132 (97%) patients. 55 patients (40%) had intermittent claudication, 16 (12%) rest pain and 65 (48%) had ischemic ulcerations (mean RF class = 4.2 ± 1.1). 15 (11%) patients had TASC B lesions, whereas the majority 72 (53%) and 49 (36%) exhibited TASC C and D lesions, respectively. Mean PACSS score was 3.3 ± 0.9. Mean lesion length was 106 ± 92 mm. Atherectomy was combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) in 129 (95%) patients. Nine (6.6%) patients with infra-inguinal lesions received stents. Technical and procedural success were recorded in 102 (75%) and 135 (99%), respectively. Perforation was noticed in 2 (1%), whereas asymptomatic embolism occurred in 6 (4%) patients. Clinical success was present in 54 (100%) patients with claudication and in 65 of 78 (83%) patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Atherectomy in combination with DCB angioplasty can be safely performed in patients with complex, calcified peripheral lesions with a relatively low rate of bail-out stenting and promising clinical mid-term results.German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00016708.

Effect of Target Lesion Revascularization on Restenosis Lesions of the Superficial Femoral Artery without Recurred Symptoms after Endovascular Therapy

Aim: This study aims to elucidate the effects of early application of target lesion revascularization (TLR) to restenosis lesions of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) without recurrence of symptoms. Despite recent improvements in endovascular therapy (EVT) for the SFA, restenosis remains to be a problem. However, restenosis is not always associated with the recurrence of limb symptoms. Although early application of TLR is not generally approved for restenosis lesions of the SFA without recurred symptoms, it is expected to contribute to long-term patency and other favorable outcomes. Nonetheless, its effectiveness remains to be determined.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 616 patients who developed restenosis after undergoing femoro-popliteal EVT for claudication (Rutherford category 1 to 3) due to de novo femoro-popliteal lesions between January 2010 and December 2016 at 11 centers in Japan. Recurred symptoms were defined as symptoms of the same or higher Rutherford categories than those immediately before the initial EVT.

Results: Of the patients, 291 (47 %) lacked recurred symptoms; 69 (24 %) underwent TLR for restenosis. After propensity matching, the risk of occlusion was determined to be not significantly different between the TLR and observation groups; the 3-year occlusion-free rate was 68 % and 62 %, respectively (P=0.84). The risk of recurring symptoms, critical limb ischemia, and all-cause death was also found to be comparable between groups. The incidence of target vessel revascularization was significantly higher in the TLR than in the observation group (1.55 [95 % confidence interval: 1.25–1.93] vs. 0.59 [0.41–0.85] per 3 person-years).

Conclusions: In patients with SFA restenosis without recurred symptoms, early application of TLR showed no advantages.

Is vessel prep necessary before treating the superficial femoral artery?

The standard of care for treating symptomatic peripheral arterial disease has been percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting over the last couple of years. This endovascular treatment of claudicants or patients with critical limb ischemia has increased in numbers and has even surpassed open surgery. Our daily practice has evolved to an endovascular-first approach, especially in the femoropopliteal region, being the most frequently treated vessel. However, neointimal hyperplasia and elastic recoil leading to target lesion restenosis or occlusion after initial successful treatment is not uncommon. In recent years, drug-eluting technologies on balloons or stents have been investigated as a potential solution for this problem with excellent results compared to plain-old balloon angioplasty. Nonetheless in the majority of those trials, the bailout stenting rate increased with lesion complexity, albeit it in long or heavily calcified lesions due to flow-limiting dissections, elastic recoil or the calcium barrier preventing adequate drug uptake. There is a need for vessel preparation in order to ameliorate drug delivery, especially in complex lesions. Multiple devices are available to prepare even the most challenging lesions for drug uptake or stenting, by achieving maximal luminal gain and by minimizing dissections. This review aims to give an overview of the most common modalities for vessel preparation in the superficial femoral artery beside plain old balloon angioplasty together with an overview of the current literature of each device in the superficial femoral artery.

Current Role of Atherectomy for Treatment of Femoropopliteal and Infrapopliteal Disease

Atherectomy improves the acute procedural success of a procedure whether treating de novo or restenotic (including in-stent) disease. Intermediate follow-up results seem to be in favor of atherectomy in delaying and reducing the need for repeat revascularization in patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis. Recent data suggest that avoiding cutting into the external elastic lamina is an important factor in reducing restenosis. The interplay between directional atherectomy and drug-coated balloons is unclear.

Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-stent Restenosis

Femoropopliteal (FP) artery-in stent restenosis (ISR) is a daunting management problem that we continue to face. FP artery-ISR rates after primary stent implantation are relatively high. Although repeat FP artery-ISR and the need for additional interventions remain all too common, little consensus exists regarding the best treatment algorithm. In this article, we review the limitations of the currently used devices for the endovascular treatment of FP artery-ISR and discuss which strategies are the most effective and safe.

Treatment of Superficial Femoral Artery Restenosis

PURPOSE

To determine the predictors of restenosis, major adverse limb events (MALEs), postoperative death (POD), and all-cause mortality after repeat endovascular treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) restenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 440 patients with 518 SFA lesions who were treated between January 2002 and October 2011. Ninety-six limbs were treated for restenosis with bare metal stents (BMSs) or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), of which 28 limbs developed another restenosis requiring a third procedure. The interaction measured in this study was between the second and third intervention. Predictors of SFA patency, MALEs, POD, and all-cause mortality after SFA restenosis treatment were identified.

RESULTS

Patients who were treated with BMSs (n = 51) had similar rates of restenosis compared with patients who were treated with PTA (n = 45) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-2.90; P = .37). Patients in the BMS group who took statins had a significantly lower risk of restenosis than patients who did not take statins (HR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04-0.41; P < .001). Stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n = 12) was associated with a significantly higher risk of MALE + POD (HR 6.17; 95% CI 1.45-26.18; P = .014) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.83; 95% CI 1.27-6.33; P = .01). Clopidogrel was protective against all-cause mortality (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.20-0.80; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the BMS group who took statins at the time of intervention had a significantly lower risk of developing restenosis. Stage 4-5 CKD was a risk factor for MALE + POD and all-cause mortality, while clopidogrel decreased all-cause mortality risk.

Debulking Atherectomy in the Peripheral Arteries: Is There a Role and What is the Evidence?

Traditional percutaneous balloon angioplasty and stent placement is based on mechanical plaque disruption and displacement within the arterial wall. On the contrary, transcatheter atherectomy achieves atherosclerotic plaque clearance by means of directional plaque excision or rotational plaque removal or laser plaque ablation. Debulking atherectomy may allow for a more uniform angioplasty result at lower pressures with consequently less vessel barotrauma and improved luminal gain, thereby decreasing the risk of plaque recoil and dissection that may require permanent metal stenting. It has been also argued that atherectomy may disrupt the calcium barrier and optimize drug transfer and delivery in case of drug-coated balloon applications. The authors discuss the various types of atherectomy devices available in clinical practice to date and critically appraise their mode of action as well as relevant published data in each case. Overall, amassed randomized and observational evidence indicates that percutaneous atherectomy of the femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal arteries may achieve high technical success rates and seems to lessen the frequency of bailout stenting, however, at the expense of increased risk of peri-procedural distal embolization. Long-term clinical outcomes reported to date do not support the superiority of percutaneous atherectomy over traditional balloon angioplasty and stent placement in terms of vessel patency or limb salvage. The combination of debulking atherectomy and drug-coated balloons has shown promise in early studies, especially in the treatment of more complex lesions. Unanswered questions and future perspectives of this continuously evolving endovascular technology as part of a broader treatment algorithm are discussed.

Peripheral Atherectomy: Applications and Techniques

Peripheral atherectomy is a class of procedures that is rapidly increasing in volume. Multiple classes of devices exist, and newer variants are added to the market annually. The devices see wide application for de novo lesions, in-stent restenosis, and adjunctive therapy for drug-coated balloons. The body of evidence supporting atherectomy is less robust than for many other peripheral therapies. The frequency and severity of complications from atherectomy can be significant compared with angioplasty and stenting, and familiarity with preventative and bailout techniques is essential for the interventionalist.

Prospective Randomized Study of Sarpogrelate Versus Clopidogrel-based Dual Antiplatelet Therapies in Patients Undergoing Femoropopliteal Arterial Endovascular Interventions: Preliminary Results

Background:

Sarpogrelate is a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor subtype 2A antagonist which blocks 5-HT induced platelet aggregation and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. We compared the efficacy of sarpogrelate-based dual antiplatelet therapies for the prevention of restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates comparing with that of clopidogrel after percutaneous endovascular interventions (EVIs) of femoropopliteal (FP) arterial lesions.

Methods:

This prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial recruited a total of 120 patients with successful EVI of FP lesions at seven centers across China between January 2011 and June 2012. Patients were randomized to receive either sarpogrelate (100 mg trice daily for 6 months, n = 63) or clopidogrel (75 mg once daily for 6 months, n = 57). All patients also received oral aspirin (100 mg once daily for 12 months). Clinical follow-up was conducted up to 12 months postprocedure.

Results:

There was no significant difference between the two groups in basic demographic data. The restenosis rate was higher in the clopidogrel group (22.80%) than in sarpogrelate group (17.50%), but there was no significant difference between these two groups (P = 0.465). The TLR rate, ipsilateral amputation rate, mortality in all-cause and bleeding rate were also similar in the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions:

Aspirin plus sarpogrelate is a comparable antithrombotic regimen to aspirin plus clopidogrel after EVI of FP arterial lesions. Dual antiplatelet therapies might play an important role in preventing restenosis after successful EVI of FP lesions.

The association between periprocedural factors and the late outcome of percutaneous stenting of lower extremity arteries. A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

About 20–30% of the population have peripheral artery disease. Many of them require intervention, with a percutaneous procedure currently being the first choice. However, the outcomes of these interventions need regular evaluation due to continuous progress in endovascular techniques and the devices used.

Aim

The aim of this study was to analyze procedural factors influencing the outcome of endovascular intervention in patients stented for the first time due to lower extremity atherosclerosis.

Material and methods

The medical documentation of 91 patients with at least 1 year of follow-up after stenting of a lower limb artery was retrospectively evaluated. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

The mean observation time was 544.4 ±502.9 days. The primary patency of a stent after such a follow-up was 68.1%. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that the risk of target lesion revascularization was affected by the following (hazard risk, 95% confidence interval): the number of vascular segments with significant lesions (13.14, 2.28–75.8); critical limb ischemia (5.68, 1.23–26.2); localization of the target lesion in an aorto-iliac in comparison with a femoro-popliteal vascular segment (0.37, 0.14–0.7); aorto-iliac lesion class according to the TASC-II consensus (1.96, 1.1–3.8); and claudication distance (1.02, 1.01–1.03).

Conclusions

The common primary patency of a stent implanted into either an aorto-iliac or a femoro-popliteal vascular segment was similar to that found in other reports. The main factors affecting the outcome of the endovascular procedures performed were mainly related to atherosclerosis severity, not to the type of technique or device used.