Ostomy-Related Complications

Umbrella review of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of using mesh in the prevention of parastomal hernias

BACKGROUND

This umbrella review aimed to summarize the findings and conclusions of published systematic reviews on the prophylactic role of mesh against parastomal hernias in colorectal surgery.

METHODS

PRISMA-compliant umbrella overview of systematic reviews on the role of mesh in prevention of parastomal hernias was conducted. PubMed and Scopus were searched through November 2023. Main outcomes were efficacy and safety of mesh. Efficacy was assessed by the rates of clinically and radiologically detected hernias and the need for surgical repair, while safety was assessed by the rates of overall complications.

RESULTS

19 systematic reviews were assessed; 7 included only patients with end colostomy and 12 included patients with either ileostomy or colostomy. The use of mesh significantly reduced the risk of clinically detected parastomal hernias in all reviews except one. Seven reviews reported a significantly lower risk of radiologically detected parastomal hernias with the use of mesh. The pooled hazards ratio of clinically detected and radiologically detected parastomal hernias was 0.33 (95%CI: 0.26-0.41) and 0.55 (95%CI: 0.45-0.68), respectively. Six reviews reported a significant reduction in the need for surgical repair when a mesh was used whereas six reviews found a similar need for hernia repair. The pooled hazards ratio for surgical hernia repair was 0.46 (95%CI: 0.35-0.62). Eight reviews reported similar complications in the two groups. The pooled hazard ratio of complications was 0.81 (95%CI: 0.66-1).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of surgical mesh is likely effective and safe in the prevention of parastomal hernias without an increased risk of overall complications.

Balloon dilatation followed by triamcinolone acetonide injection for colostomy stenosis: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Stenosis is a serious complication associated with stomas. The initial treatment for stoma stenosis is mainly the finger-bougie technique or balloon dilatation, and recurrence requires stomal reconstruction. However, the use of local triamcinolone injections for treating stoma stenosis has not been reported. Herein, we reported a case of repeated stoma stenosis in a high-risk patient in whom balloon dilatation combined with local triamcinolone injection effectively avoided stomal reconstruction.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A woman in her 70s was admitted to our hospital with the chief complaint of a positive fecal occult blood test and was diagnosed with Ra advanced rectal cancer. Owing to the presence of multiple comorbidities, a laparoscopic Hartmann procedure with D3 dissection was performed. The operative time was 165 min and the intraoperative blood loss was 5 mL. On postoperative day 2, the colostomy stump became discolored, and stoma necrosis was diagnosed, which was successfully treated conservatively, with no findings of stoma falling or peritonitis. Six months after surgery, late stoma stenosis causing colonic obstruction was diagnosed, and the finger-bougie technique and balloon dilatation were ineffective. To avoid reoperation under general anesthesia, balloon dilatation using a CRE™ PRO GI Wireguided (Boston Scientific) at 19 mm for 3 min combined with a 40 mg injection of local triamcinolone into the stoma orifice scar was successfully performed.

DISCUSSION

No restenosis was observed after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Balloon dilatation combined with local triamcinolone injections may be effective for recurrent stoma stenosis in patients with high-risk comorbidities after rectal cancer surgery.

Modified delayed coloanal anastomosis following TME for mid and low rectal cancer: 19 consecutive patients from a single center

Surgery and management of rectal cancer have made significant progress in recent decades. However, there is still no coloanal anastomosis technique that offers a good compromise between functionality and low morbidity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficiency of the modified delayed coloanal anastomosis (mDCA). In this retrospective study, we analyzed the morbi-mortality as well as functional outcomes of 19 patients treated with mDCA, out of 73 colorectal cancer patients treated at our institution from September 2021 to June 2023. The inclusion criteria were cancer of the mid and low rectum (tumor less than 10 cm from the anal verge). Morbidity represented by complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher was estimated at 5.2%. Only one patient experienced an asymptomatic anastomotic leak (AL) grade A. Ischemia of the colonic stump occurred in one patient, taken back to the OR on the 5th postoperative day. No stump retraction was noted. Anastomotic stenosis appeared in one patient (5.2%) during the 90-day postoperative period, and was treated by instrumental dilation. Perioperative mortality was nil. The mean St Marks incontinence score at 90 days was 13.2 points. At the 3-month follow-up, 15 patients (78.9%) had major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), three (15.7%) had minor LARS, and one patient (5.2%) had no LARS. None of the patients had a diversion loop ileostomy. The mDCA, by decreasing the rate of AL, without the need for diversion ileostomy, might be an interesting alternative to the conventional immediate coloanal anastomosis (ICA), for restoring the GI tract after proctectomy for cancer.

Patient adherence to an oral rehydration solution intervention to prevent dehydration following ileostomy creation: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing surgery for ileostomy creation frequently experience postoperative dehydration and subsequent renal injury. The use of oral rehydration solutions (ORS) has been shown to prevent dehydration, but compliance may be variable.

METHODS

Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 patients who received a postoperative hydration kit and dehydration education to assess barriers and facilitators to compliance with ORS kit instructions.

RESULTS

Qualitative analysis revealed five themes affecting patient adherence to the ORS intervention: (1) patient's perception of the effectiveness of the ORS solution, (2) existing co-morbidities, (3) kit quality and taste of the ORS product, (4) quality of the dehydration education, and (5) social support.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that patient adherence can greatly affect the success of an ORS intervention, the design of future ORS interventions should emphasize the educational component, the "patient friendliness" of the ORS kit, and ways that social supports can be leveraged to increase adherence.

The Impact of Colostomy on Inpatient Outcomes Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction The inpatient postoperative outcomes of patients with colostomies following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have not been well studied in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze how colostomy impacts the immediate postoperative outcomes of TKA. Our null hypothesis is that after correcting for common variables, a colostomy does not predispose patients undergoing TKA to surgical site infections (SSIs) and periprosthetic infections. Methods The National Inpatient Sample database was used to retrieve information on colostomy patients and patients without a colostomy who had undergone primary TKA from 2016 to 2019. Patients with colostomies were matched to a cohort of non-colostomy control groups in a 1:1 propensity score algorithm by age, sex, race, and pertinent comorbidities. Patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, length of hospital stay (LOS), total hospital charges, and inpatient complications were compared. Results Following propensity score matching, 399 patients with colostomies were compared to 385 patients without a colostomy (control). The colostomy group had a prolonged LOS (3.15 ± 2.67 vs 2.44 ± 3.15 days, p<0.001) compared to the control group. Also, the colostomy group had significantly higher incidences of acute kidney injury (AKI) (6.02% vs 1.56%, odds ratio (OR): 4.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.63-10.00, p<0.001), blood loss anemia (20.55% vs 13.25%, OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.16-2.48, p=0.008), and blood transfusions (4.01% vs 0.26%, OR: 16.04, 95% CI: 2.12-121.56, p<0.001). There was no difference in periprosthetic infection, superficial SSI, or deep SSI. Conclusion Patients with colostomies face a notably higher risk of experiencing AKI, blood loss anemia, and blood transfusion requirements during the immediate postoperative period following primary TKA. Despite the perceived risk of postoperative infection in colostomy patients, this patient population is not at an increased risk of developing periprosthetic infection, superficial SSI, or deep SSI following TKA.

Body Fit With a Pouching System With Concave Contour for People With an Outward Peristomal Body Profile: Effects on Leakage, Wear Time, and Quality of Life: A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the fit of a two-piece pouching system with a concave-shaped skin barrier on people with an outward peristomal body profile and its effect on leakage, wear time, and quality of life (QoL) related to using an ostomy product.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, open-label, cross-over trial.

SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS

The sample comprised 53 subjects with outward peristomal body profiles and problems with leakage of ostomy effluent from their pouching system. Participants were randomized to the concave two-piece pouching system or a comparator (two-piece pouching system with a flat skin barrier) for 3 weeks. Subjects were then crossed over to the opposite skin barrier for an additional 3 weeks. The study was conducted in Denmark, Norway, Germany, and the Netherlands; data were collected in multiple ambulatory clinics or during home visits.

METHODS

The primary end point was the ability of the skin barrier to fit body contours; secondary outcomes were leakage of effluent from the pouching system, wear time, and QoL related to using an ostomy product via the validated Ostomy-Q questionnaire. Primary comparisons between concave and comparator pouching systems were evaluated using proportional odds models and mixed models taking test period into account.

RESULTS

Analysis included randomized subjects who had been exposed to at least one product and with information on at least one end point (full-analysis-set, n = 52). The concave pouching system provided a better fit to body contours than the comparator (P< .001) and reduced the degree of leakage underneath the skin barrier (LS mean difference = -1.84, 95% CI -3.31 to -0.37; P = .016). Participants experienced fewer episodes of leakage outside the skin barrier when using concave versus comparator pouching system (13.0% vs. 26.7%, respectively). Participants reported significant improvements in QoL (LS mean difference = 14.3; 95% CI 9.4 to 19.2; P < .001). No significant difference in wear time between skin barrier shapes was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings indicate that a pouching system with a concave skin barrier achieved a better body fit on people with an outward peristomal body profile and resulted in fewer leakage incidents and higher QoL compared to using a pouching system with a flat skin barrier.

Smooth Return to Work Through Early Rehabilitation and Interdisciplinary Collaboration After Ostomy: A Case Report of a Japanese Patient

A male patient in his 40s was diagnosed with rectal cancer and underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) with permanent end colostomy as surgical treatment. He wanted to return to work as soon as possible after discharge. A physical therapist (PT) was involved in the preoperative consultation, and both the PT and occupational therapist started bed rest and activities of daily living (ADL) practice the day after surgery. On the third postoperative day, lightweight trunk exercises were initiated with a gradual increase in load. Stoma management was supervised by a nurse and progress was monitored. The patient's progress in ADLs, postoperative complications, and return to work were evaluated two weeks after discharge. Consequently, the patient was able to continue rehabilitation without early complications related to postoperative stoma. He could lift 20 kg and return to carpentry two weeks after discharge. The stoma quality of life improved from 61 points at two weeks after surgery to 74 points at two weeks after discharge. Early rehabilitation for social reintegration after ostomy creation can be safely performed under PT supervision, and a comprehensive interprofessional collaboration can contribute to smooth social reintegration.

Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life in Younger Persons With a Fecal Ostomy and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine predictors of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in persons aged 18 to 40 years living with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and a fecal ostomy.

DESIGN

Descriptive cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

The sample comprised 98 participants recruited from online discussion boards/support groups for individuals living with IBD and an intestinal ostomy. More than three-quarters (76.5%) were female; 45.9% (n = 44) had lived with an ostomy for 2 years or less. Data were collected through an online survey made available from October 2018 to December 2018.

METHODS

HRQOL was measured using the Healthy Days Core Module (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HRQOL-4). Item 1 from the CDC HRQOL-4 represented the variable self-rated health (SRH). The subscales of bodily pain, general mental health, and vitality from the Short-Form 36 Health Survey and the subscales of ostomy function and body image/sexuality plus skin irritation item from the Young-Fadok Stoma Quality of Life (QOL) Scale were used to measure predictors of pain, psychological distress, fatigue, peristomal skin irritation, leakage of ostomy appliance, and body image/sexual disturbance. Correlational and hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to complete hypotheses testing.

RESULTS

Significant correlations were found between pain, fatigue, peristomal skin problems, psychological distress, SRH, and HRQOL. Pain, fatigue, psychological distress, and self-related health explained 53.2% of the variance in HRQOL based on hierarchical multiple linear regression and controlling for demographic variables such as marital and employment status.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest global disease symptoms of IBD in the form of pain, fatigue, and psychological distress and individual perception of health (SRH) are more important than transient ostomy symptoms of peristomal skin complications and leakage of ostomy appliance in predicting HRQOL. Individuals in this population regularly use online resources indicating a need to understand and gain insight into the information posted online in the management of the fecal ostomy and IBD.

Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis versus standard coloanal anastomosis plus diverting ileostomy for low anterior resection: a meta-analysis and systematic review

PURPOSE

Coloanal anastomosis with loop diverting ileostomy (CAA) is an option for low anterior resection of the rectum, and Turnbull-Cutait coloanal anastomosis (TCA) regained popularity in the effort to offer patients a reconstructive option. In this context, we aimed to compare both techniques.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched for studies published until January 2024. Odds ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled with a random-effects model. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics, with p-values inferior to 0.10 and I2 >25% considered significant. Statistical analysis was conducted in RStudio version 4.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Registered number CRD42024509963.

RESULTS

One randomized controlled trial and nine observational studies were included, comprising 1,743 patients, of whom 899 (51.5%) were submitted to TCA and 844 (48.5%) to CAA. Most patients had rectal cancer (52.2%), followed by megacolon secondary to Chagas disease (32.5%). TCA was associated with increased colon ischemia (OR 3.54; 95% CI 1.13 to 11.14; p < 0.031; I2 = 0%). There were no differences in postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb, anastomotic leak, pelvic abscess, intestinal obstruction, bleeding, permanent stoma, or anastomotic stricture. In subgroup analysis of patients with cancer, TCA was associated with a reduction in anastomotic leak (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.97 p = 0.04; I2 = 34%).

CONCLUSION

TCA was associated with a decrease in anastomotic leak rate in subgroups analysis of patients with cancer.

Enhancing drug therapy in ostomy patients: Best practice recommendations for medication management

BACKGROUND

Ostomy surgery is a common procedure that poses various challenges for patients and healthcare professionals. There are numerous guidelines addressing different ostomy-related problems (ORPs) and supporting an interdisciplinary approach for ostomy care, but evidence-based literature for optimizing drug therapy after ostomy surgery is lacking.

AIM

To investigate and characterize typical ORPs in relation to drug therapy and provide best practice recommendations from a pharmaceutical point of view.

METHODS

Patients with an ileo- or colostomy were consecutively enrolled in a prospective, interventional monocentric cohort study during hospitalization, with particular attention to medication. A clinical pharmacist assessed DRPs by performing level 3 medication reviews and patient interviews. Pharmacists' interventions (PIs) were evaluated by two senior clinical pharmacists and documented in DokuPIK (Documentation of Pharmacists' Interventions in the Hospital). Following interdisciplinary discussions, physicians either accepted or rejected the proposed changes in drug therapy. Comparisons were made between ileostomy and colostomy patients regarding type and extent of PIs.

RESULTS

Out of the 80 patients included in the cohort, 54 (67.5%) had an ileostomy and 26 (32.5%) a colostomy. In this study, 288 PIs were documented (234 ileostomy vs. 54 colostomy), of wich 94.0% were accepted and implemented by the physicians. The most common reason for PIs in both subgroups (29.6% ileostomy vs. 26.1% colostomy) was a missing drug although indicated (e.g. no loperamide, but high stoma output). The proportion of PIs associated with the ostomy was higher in ileostomy patients (48.3% ileostomy vs. 31.5% colostomy; p = 0.025). Typical ORPs were extracted and analyzed as case studies including recommendations for their respective management and prevention.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance of clinical pharmacists being a part of interdisciplinary teams to collaboratively improve ostomy care and patient safety. Especially ileostomy patients are more vulnerable for ORPs in the context of drug therapy and need to be monitored carefully.

Reduced preoperative serum choline esterase levels and fecal peritoneal contamination as potential predictors for the leakage of intestinal sutures after source control in secondary peritonitis

BACKGROUND

The high rate of stoma placement during emergency laparotomy for secondary peritonitis is a paradigm in need of change in the current fast-track surgical setting. Despite growing evidence for the feasibility of primary bowel reconstruction in a peritonitic environment, little data substantiate a surgeons' choice between a stoma and an anastomosis. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to identify pre- and intraoperative parameters that predict the leakage risk for enteric sutures placed during source control surgery (SCS) for secondary peritonitis.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2020, 497 patients underwent SCS for secondary peritonitis, of whom 187 received a primary reconstruction of the lower gastro-intestinal tract without a diverting stoma. In 47 (25.1%) patients postoperative leakage of the enteric sutures was directly confirmed during revision surgery or by computed tomography. Quantifiable predictors of intestinal suture outcome were detected by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Length of intensive care, in-hospital mortality and failure of release to the initial home environment were significantly higher in patients with enteric suture leakage following SCS compared to patients with intact anastomoses (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0026 and p =0.0009, respectively). Reduced serum choline esterase (sCHE) levels and a high extent of peritonitis were identified as independent risk factors for insufficiency of enteric sutures placed during emergency laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

A preoperative sCHE < 4.5 kU/L and generalized fecal peritonitis associate with a significantly higher incidence of enteric suture insufficiency after primary reconstruction of the lower gastro-intestinal tract in a peritonitic abdomen. These parameters may guide surgeons when choosing the optimal surgical procedure in the emergency setting.

Management of the Difficult Stoma

Fecal ostomy creation is a commonly performed procedure with many indications. Better outcomes occur when preoperative patient education and stoma site marking are provided. Despite a seemingly simple operation, ostomy creation is often difficult and complications are common. Certain risk factors, particularly obesity, are strongly associated with stoma-related complications. The ability to optimize the ostomy and stoma in the operating room and to troubleshoot frequently encountered post-operative stoma-related issues are critical skills for surgeons and ostomy nurses alike.

Proof of concept of an experimental prototype for the prevention of parastomal hernia

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyse the complications and problems associated with the use of an experimental prototype designed for the prevention of parastomal hernia (PSH), one of the most frequent complications in ostomates.

METHODS

A single-centre, non-comparative, proof-of-concept interventional pilot study of an experimental prototype designed to be used in conjunction with an abdominal compression binder to prevent PSH was conducted. The "Ostomy Fixation Device for Hernia Prevention" (patent P201531826) is a semi-rigid ostomy protector, to be used in conjunction with a compression binder. It is designed to adapt to the dimensions of standard ostomy bags from different brands and serves to transmit, in a localised manner, the support coming from the compression binder in the peristomal area without putting pressure on the collection bag. The main outcome measures were efficacy, safety, and patient-users' opinion/perception.

RESULTS

Ten patients were studied for 12 months. Mean age was 61 years (± 11.59), 70% (7) were male, 80% (8) ostomised for colorectal cancer, 90% (9) underwent planned surgery and 80% (8) had a colostomy.

EFFICACY

the incidence of HPE was 10% (1).

SAFETY

no participant experienced pain, discomfort, itching, stinging, leakage, pouch detachment, allergy to components, or injury to the stoma or peristomal skin due to rubbing or pressure. 90% (n = 9) were considered "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with the device.

CONCLUSIONS

An innovative device designed in collaboration between healthcare professionals and end-users has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing PSH in the group of ostomates studied.

Risk factors for stoma prolapse after laparoscopic loop colostomy

BACKGROUND

Stoma prolapse (SP) is a common stoma-related complication, particularly in loop colostomies. This study aimed to investigate potential risk factors for SP development after laparoscopic loop colostomy.

METHODS

In total, data from 140 patients who underwent laparoscopic loop colostomy were analyzed between September 2016 and March 2022. Risk factors for SP were investigated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration after colostomy was 12.5 months, and SP occurred in 33 (23.6%) patients. Multivariate analysis showed that being overweight (body mass index ≥ 25; odds ratio [OR], 8.69; 95% confidential interval [CI], 1.61-46.72; p = 0.012) and having a thin rectus abdominis penetration of the stoma (< 8.9 mm; OR, 8.22; 95% CI, 2.50-27.05; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for SP. Other patient characteristics and surgical factors associated with stoma construction were unrelated to SP development.

CONCLUSIONS

Being overweight and the route penetrating the thinner rectus abdominis during stoma construction was associated with a significantly higher incidence of SP after laparoscopic loop colostomy. Selecting a construction site that penetrates the thicker rectus abdominis muscle may be crucial for preventing SP.

Factors associated with stoma closure after cytoreductive surgery

BACKGROUND

The rate of stoma closure after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ​± ​hypethermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is reportedly low. This study aimed to assess predictors of stoma reversal.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent CRS with temporary ostomy at our center between 2009 and 2021, and compared reversed versus non-reversed patients.

RESULTS

Out of 625 CRS, 72 (11.5%) patients were included (median age 62 years, 65% female, 75% with HIPEC): 53 (74%) achieved stoma closure. Reversed patients had less high grade tumors, more appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, less ovarian primaries, and more loop ileostomies. The most common reason for non-reversal was disease progression or death (14 cases, 74%). At multivariate analysis, low/intermediate grade tumor differentiation was associated with higher stoma closure rate.

CONCLUSION

In our study, 74% of patients achieved stoma closure after CRS with temporary ostomy. The strongest predictor of stoma closure was a low/intermediate grade tumor.

Missed nursing care and stoma care: an Italian survey

BACKGROUND

In Italy, nursing research has paid special attention to 'missed nursing care'. The studies carried out, varying in tools and settings, describe considerable percentages of missed care. In the field of stoma care, the phenomenon has not been investigated to date.

AIM

To investigate the prevalence of missed nursing care (MNC) in the Italian ostomy patient population and the most relevant causes suggested for this by stoma care nurses.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHOD

The Italian version of the MISSCARE survey was used with some questions related to the stoma care pathway. The survey was targeted at hospitals in the country with dedicated services and/or pathways for ostomy patients, between February and April 2023.

FINDINGS

A total of 461 questionnaires were sent out, 214 (53.3%) were analysed. The majority of the participants were female (160, 76.2%), median age of 50 years (35.0-53.8). The most common qualification was a Bachelor's degree (n=117; 54.9%) and work experience in stoma care was more than 10 years in 95 cases (50.3%). Prominent instances of MNC were identified, with hand washing (score 4.6 out of 5), compilation of nursing documentation and hygiene/skin care (score 4.5 out of 5) and patient/family education (score 4.4 out of 5) emerging as the most prevalent. The most notable omissions in the stoma care process encompassed educational facets, clinical monitoring, a comprehensive discharge plan, and diligent follow-up. Among the most frequent reasons were staff shortages (score 3.1 out of 4), unsuitable nurse-patient ratios (score of 3 out of 4) and insufficient numbers of experienced stoma care personnel (score of 3 out of 4).

CONCLUSION

A substantial number of basic and clinically relevant nursing interventions were perceived to be missed, and this may lead to an increase in negative outcomes for ostomy patients.

Development of a leakage impact assessment for patients with a stoma, who may be impacted by leakage

For people living with a stoma leakage is unpredictable. Despite advances in stoma products, leakage can lead to soiling and this, along with worrying about leakage, can significantly affect patients' everyday lives and impact their quality of life. It is also associated with excessive product use and increased healthcare resources. Leakage therefore remains a major unmet need for many people living with a stoma. To address this, Coloplast Ltd in collaboration with the authors and a broader group of stoma care nurses have worked together to develop a first version of the Leakage Impact Assessment. This assessment is intended to identify patients who struggle with leakage and leakage worry, and who might benefit from the reassurance that a new digital leakage notification system, Heylo™, can provide. This article reviews the evidence for leakage and its impact on people living with a stoma and outlines the development process for the assessment.

Associations between preparedness, perceived stress, depression, and quality of life in family caregivers of patients with a temporary enterostomy

PURPOSE

To investigate the preparedness, perceived stress, risk of depression, and quality of life of family caregivers of patients receiving a temporary enterostomy, to provide a reference for improving the long-term care and quality of life of patients receiving a temporary enterostomy.

METHODS

We enrolled 181 family caregivers of patients in a hospital in China from 2021 to 2023. Responses to the General Information Questionnaire, the Chinese Caregiver Preparedness Scale, the Chinese Perceived Stress Scale, the Chinese bilingual version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2, and the 12-item Short Form Survey were collected online.

RESULTS

Pearson's correlation analysis revealed that family caregivers' risk of depression was negatively correlated with their preparedness, the physical component summary score, and the mental component summary score but was positively correlated with perceived stress. Multiple linear regression analysis identified factors influencing caregiver preparedness.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings help healthcare personnel to identify high-risk individuals among family caregivers of patients receiving a temporary enterostomy. This provides a basis for formulating well-planned, dynamic health education programs that meet patients' needs for disease-related knowledge and care.

'Dumpling suture method' versus traditional suture method of protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with specimen extraction through stoma incision: a retrospective comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

A diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) is performed in laparoscopic anterior rectal resection (LAR) surgery at high risk of anastomotic fistula. Minimally invasive surgery promotes postoperative recovery and cosmetics. To reduce abdominal trauma, specimen extraction through stoma incision (EXSI) is usually performed to avoid auxiliary abdominal incision with enlarged stomal incision. The traditional suture method (TSM) reduces the incision size by suturing the ends of the enlarged incision, leading to peristomal incisions and a higher risk of stomal complications. The study aimed to introduce the dumpling suture method (DSM) of PLI and compare this new method with TSM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors propose a novel stoma suture technique, which utilized a method of skin folding suture to reduce the enlarged incision size. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 71 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent LAR-DLI with EXSI, and the intraoperative details and postoperative outcomes of the two groups were measured.

RESULTS

The DSM group showed a lower stomal complication rate (10.3 vs. 35.7%, P=0.016) than that of the TSM group. The scores of DET (Discoloration, Erosion, Tissue overgrowth), stomal pain, quality of life were all significantly lower in DSM group than in TSM group. In multivariate analysis, DSM was an independent protective factor for stoma-related complications. Operative time, time to first flatus, defecation and eat, nonstomal related postoperative complications were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

DSM utilizes a method of skin folding suture to reduce the enlarged incision size, which is safe and effective in reducing the incidence of peristomal skin infections and stomal complications. This procedure offers a novel suturing approach for loop ileostomy with enlarged incision, effectively reducing the postoperative trauma and incidence of stomal complications.

Risk factors for early ostomy complications in emergency and elective colorectal surgery: A single-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The clinical significance of early ostomy complications has been emphasized worldwide, and the current evidence concerning the impact of emergency or elective surgery on ostomy complications is limited. This study aimed to investigate the effect of elective and emergency colorectal surgery on early ostomy complications and the risk factors associated with specific complications.

METHODS

A mandatory colorectal recording system for consecutive ostomy patients between 2012 and 2020 was reviewed retrospectively. Patient socio-demographics, ostomy-related variables, and early period ostomy complications were retrieved from the patient records. The chi-square test, t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and logistic regression were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 872 patients. At least one or more complications developed in 573 (65.7%) patients, 356 (63.6%) in the emergency group, and 217 (69.6%) in the elective group. When comparing emergency surgery to elective surgery, necrosis (7.4% versus 3.4%, p = 0.009), mucocutaneous separation (37.2% versus 27.1%, p = 0.002), and bleeding (6.1% versus 2.1%, p = 0.003) were more prevalent. Peristomal irritant contact dermatitis (PICD) (37.3% versus 26%, p < 0.001) was more common in elective surgery. Risk factors for PICD were comorbidity (p = 0.003), malignant disease (p = 0.047), and loop ostomy (p < 0.001) in elective surgery; female sex (p = 0.025), neo-adjuvant therapy (p = 0.024), and ileostomy (p = 0.006) in emergency surgery. The height of the ostomy (less than 10 mm) was a modifiable risk factor for mucocutaneous separation in both elective surgery (p < 0.001) and emergency surgery (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Early ostomy complications were more likely to occur after emergency colorectal surgery than in an elective setting. Patient- and ostomy-related risk factors for complications differed between elective and emergency surgeries.

Management of a Peristomal Abscess in a Patient With an Ileostomy: A Case Study

BACKGROUND

Peristomal abscess (PA) is an uncommon but challenging peristomal skin complication. The initial treatment of the PA usually includes incision and drainage of the abscess, resulting in a peristomal wound. The presence of the wound makes it difficult to maintain a seal between the ostomy skin barrier and the peristomal skin resulting in frequent removal and application of the skin barrier to prevent leakage and allow for daily wound care.

CASE

Ms T was a 52-year-old woman with an ileostomy resulting from a prior left hemicolectomy for colon cancer who developed a PA. Treatment of the PA was implemented, along with a modified 2-piece skin barrier that allowed access to the peristomal wound for daily dressing changes while maintaining a seal around the ostomy.

CONCLUSION

The modified 2-piece skin barrier technique proved a successful treatment for the management of the PA without frequent changes of the ostomy pouching system.

Role of a Stoma Nurse in the Management of the Specific Stoma-Related Complications

Nursing care for patients with intestinal stomas is essential for ensuring their comfort, to prevent complications and promote their overall well-being. The quality of life of the patients with stomas can vary widely depending on their ability to adapt to the new physical and emotional state, but also to social changes that came with it. Health care professionals specializing in ostomy care can provide valuable guidance and support throughout the process. This study aims to identify and to summarize methods of nursing care for patients with an intestinal stoma and how these impact the perceived quality of life for those patients. Preoperative evaluation by an entero-stomal therapist and stoma site marking has been proved to reduce postoperative complications. Many of the peristomal skin complications can be prevented entirely by meticulous skin care. Follow-up is essential for the patient with a newly acquired intestinal ostomy to detect and provide treatment for ostomy-related complications that may occur. Regular monitoring and early intervention can help manage parastomal hernias effectively and improve the patient's quality of life.

Efferent limb stimulation prior to loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative ileus (POI) remains a common phenomenon following loop ileostomy closure. Our aim was to determine whether preoperative physiological stimulation (PPS) of the efferent limb reduced POI incidence.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis searching PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases was performed. The last search was carried out on 30 January 2023. All randomized studies comparing PPS versus no stimulation were included. The primary endpoint was POI incidence. Secondary endpoints included the time to first passage of flatus/stool, time to resume oral diet, need for nasogastric tube (NGT) placement postoperatively, length of stay (LOS) and other complications. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. Trial sequential analyses (TSA) were also performed.

RESULTS

Three randomized studies capturing 235 patients (116 PPS, 119 no stimulation) were included. On random effects analysis, PPS was associated with a quicker time to resume oral diet (MD - 1.47 days, 95% CI - 2.75 to - 0.19, p = 0.02), shorter LOS (MD - 1.47 days, 95% CI - 2.47 to - 0.46, p = 0.004) (MD - 1.41 days, 95% CI - 2.32 to - 0.50, p = 0.002, I2 = 56%) and fewer other complications (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.01, p = 0.05). However, there was no difference in POI incidence (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.21, p = 0.10), the requirement for NGT placement (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.20, p = 0.12) or time to first passage of flatus/stool (MD - 0.60 days, 95% CI - 1.95 to 0.76, p = 0.39). TSA revealed imprecise estimates for all outcomes (except LOS) and further studies are warranted to meet the required information threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

PPS prior to stoma closure may reduce LOS and postoperative complications albeit without a demonstrable beneficial effect on POI. Further high-powered studies are required to confirm or refute these findings.

Development, Validation, and Usability of the Chatbot ESTOMABOT to Promote Self-care of People With Intestinal Ostomy

This study aimed to describe the process of construction, validation, and usability of the chatbot ESTOMABOT to assist in the self-care of patients with intestinal ostomies. Methodological research was conducted in three phases: construction, validation, and usability. The first stage corresponded to the elaboration of a script through a literature review, and the second stage corresponded to face and content validation through a panel of enterostomal therapy nurses. In the third phase, the usability of ESTOMABOT was assessed with the participation of surgical clinic nurses, patients with intestinal elimination ostomies, and information technology professionals, using the System Usability Scale. The ESTOMABOT content reached excellent criteria of adequacy, with percentages of agreement equal to or greater than 90%, which were considered adequate, relevant, and representative. The evaluation of the content validity of the script using the scale content validity index/average proportion method reached a result above 0.90, and the Fleiss κ was excellent ( P < .05). The overall usability score of the chatbot was 81.5, demonstrating excellent usability. The script, developed and incorporated into the ESTOMABOT prototype, achieved satisfactory content validity. The usability of the chatbot was considered to be good, thereby increasing the credibility of the instrument.

Standardization of preoperative stoma site marking and its utility for preventing stoma leakage: a retrospective study of 519 patients who underwent laparoscopic/robotic rectal cancer surgery

PURPOSE

Stoma site marking is an important preoperative intervention for preventing various stoma-associated complications. In our institution, standardized stoma site marking is routinely performed before rectal cancer surgery with stoma creation, and various stoma-associated factors are recorded in the ostomy-record template. The present study investigated risk factors for stoma leakage.

METHODS

Our stoma site marking is standardized so that it can be performed by non-stoma specialists. To identify risk factors of stoma leakage at 3 months after surgery, various preoperative factors associated with stoma site marking in our ostomy-record template were retrospectively analyzed in 519 patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery with stoma creation from 2015 to 2020.

RESULTS

Stoma leakage was seen in 35 of the 519 patients (6.7%). The distance between the stoma site marking and the umbilicus was less than 60 mm in 27 of the 35 patients (77%) who experienced stoma leakage, so a distance of less than 60 mm was identified as an independent risk factor for stoma leakage. Aside from preoperative factors, stoma leakage was also caused by postoperative skin wrinkles or surgical scars near the stoma site in 8 of 35 patients (23%).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative standardized stoma site marking is necessary to achieve reliable marking that is easy to perform. To reduce the risk of stoma leakage, a distance of 60 mm or more between the stoma site marking and the umbilicus is ideal, and surgeons need to contrive ways to keep surgical scars away from the stoma site.

Postoperative Distal Enteral Tube Refeeding in Stoma Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Stoma surgery, which involves creating a diversion of the small intestine through an abdominal wall opening, poses challenges in managing fluid and electrolyte imbalances. Patients with high proximal stoma often rely on costly and risky parenteral nutrition (PN). Distal enteral tube feeding, a method of delivering nutrition to the small intestine, is intended to improve clinical outcomes and reduce complications. This study presents a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding and traditional enteral and PN approaches in stoma patients with distal mucous fistula.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> To evaluate the effectiveness of distal enteral tube refeeding in improving postoperative outcomes after stoma surgery and to examine the impact of distal enteral tube refeeding on total hospitalization stay, ICU length of stay, TPN duration, and time to closure of the stoma.</br> <b><br>Material and methods:</b> The study is a retrospective, single-center trial involving 84 patients who had undergone stoma surgery. The patients were divided into two groups: those receiving postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding (n = 42) and the control group (n = 42), with standard mucous fistula creation. The data was collected retrospectively from January 2012 to January 2022 and the statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, and the t-test.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> The results of our study show that the patients who had undergone postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding had a significantly shorter total hospitalization stay (p = 0.0002), a significantly shorter ICU length of stay (p = 0.0006), a significantly shorter TPN duration (p= 0.0004), and a significantly faster time to closure (p = 0.0002).</br>.

Surgical management of ostomy complications: a MISSTO-WSES mapping review

BACKGROUND

The creation of an ileostomy or colostomy is a common surgical event, both in elective and in emergency context. The main aim of stoma creation is to prevent postoperative complications, such as the anastomotic leak. However, stoma-related complications can also occur and their morbidity is not negligible, with a rate from 20 to 70%. Most stomal complications are managed conservatively, but, when this approach is not resolutive, surgical treatment becomes necessary. The aim of this mapping review is to get a comprehensive overview on the incidence, the risk factors, and the management of the main early and late ostomy complications: stoma necrosis, mucocutaneous separation, stoma retraction, stoma prolapse, parastomal hernia, stoma stenosis, and stoma bleeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A complete literature research in principal databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS and COCHRANE) was performed by Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO) for each topic, with no language restriction and limited to the years 2011-2021. An international expert panel, from MISSTO and World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), subsequently reviewed the different issues, endorsed the project, and approved the final manuscript.

CONCLUSION

Stoma-related complications are common and require a step-up management, from conservative stoma care to surgical stoma revision. A study of literature evidence in clinical practice for stoma creation and an improved management of stoma-related complications could significantly increase the quality of life of patients with ostomy. Solid evidence from the literature about the correct management is lacking, and an international consensus is needed to draw up new guidelines on this subject.

Ileostomy 101: Understanding the Basics for Optimal Patient Care

This comprehensive literature review explores the foundational aspects of ileostomy, encompassing surgical techniques, postoperative care, complications, and advancements. Ileostomy, a surgical procedure redirecting the ileal lumen through an abdominal opening, is a critical intervention for various gastrointestinal conditions. The review delves into surgical techniques, emphasizing the importance of stoma location and type selection, whether temporary or permanent. Complications associated with ileostomy are discussed, highlighting the significance of vigilant postoperative care, including stoma care and addressing potential complications. The profound impact of ileostomy on patients' quality of life is elucidated, underlining the necessity for a holistic approach to patient care. Additionally, advancements in the field, such as biodegradable stoma bags, smart stoma appliances, and telemedicine, are explored for their potential to enhance patient outcomes. The review emphasizes the need for individualized approaches and ongoing research to maximize the benefits of these advancements for ileostomy patients and improve their overall experience.

Parastomal hernia: an overview

Parastomal hernia (PH) is one of the most frequent ostomy complications, and the reported incidence in the literature is highly variable. As highlighted by the Association of Stoma Care Nurses UK, this complication develops mainly in children and older men over 70, but many predisposing factors are related to the individual patient and surgery. There is no standardised system for assessing PH. The main assessment techniques include objective examination, ultrasound scan and computed tomography. Prevention is based on various interventions by surgeons and stoma care nurses (SCNs). The SCN's primary interventions include accurate patient evaluation, pre-operative ostomy siting, education about body weight management and advice on appropriate exercises. The treatment of PH can be conservative or surgical, and the choice is based on the patient's clinical condition. Ostomy can significantly impact on a patient's quality of life (QoL), and the presence of PH can further aggravate the situation. This overview of PH considers the incidence, aetiology, prevention, treatment and impact on QoL.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Patients With Complicated Mucocutaneous Separation Following Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Mucocutaneous separation (MCS) is one of the early stomal complications of ileal conduit diversion after radical cystectomy. It can result in abdominal infection and sepsis, prolonging patient recovery. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been widely used for abdominal wounds after orthopedic and burn surgery. This case series describes its use in complicated MCS and ostomy retraction after ileal conduit diversion.

CASES

We describe a case series of 3 patients with moderate to severe MCS with and without infection after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion. Our patients were treated with NPWT to avoid infection and create a satisfactory environment for healing MCS. After 2 to 4 weeks of NPWT, all 3 patients had normal micturition function with no additional peristomal wounds or complications.

CONCLUSION

Negative pressure wound therapy may be used in the management of complicated MCS after ileal conduit diversion.

Complications of preventive loop ileostomy versus colostomy: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Preventive colostomy is required for colorectal surgery, and the incidence of complications associated with ileostomy and colostomy remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative complications between ileostomy and colostomy procedures.

METHODS

Data analysis was conducted on 30 studies, and meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed on five studies. The basic indicators, such as stoma prolapse, leak, wound infection, ileus, and a series of other indicators, were compared.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were observed with complications other than stoma prolapse. Meta-analysis and TSA showed that the incidence of ileostomy prolapse was lower than that of colostomy prolapse, and the difference was statistically significant. Apart from the four complications listed above, the general data analysis showed differences in incidence between the two groups. The incidence of skin irritation, parastomal hernia, dehydration, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections was higher with ileostomy than with colostomy. In contrast, the incidence of parastomal fistula, stenosis, hemorrhage, and enterocutaneous fistula was higher with colostomy than with ileostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

There were differences in the incidence of ileostomy and colostomy complications in the selected studies, with a low incidence of ileostomy prolapse.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022303133.

Short- and long-term direct and indirect costs of illness after ostomy creation - a Swedish nationwide registry study

BACKGROUND

Despite advance in care of people with an ostomy, related complications remain prevalent. The objective of this study was to examine short- and long-term healthcare resource utilization and associated costs after ostomy creation.

METHODS

This observational study was based on retrospectively collected data from national and regional Swedish registries. The population consisted of people living in Sweden, who had an ostomy created. The earliest index date was 1 January 2006, and people were followed for ten years, until death, reversal of temporary ostomy, termination of purchases of ostomy products, or end of study, which was 31 December 2019. Each person with an ostomy was matched with two controls from the general population based on age, gender, and region.

RESULTS

In total, 40,988 persons were included: 19,645 with colostomy, 16,408 with ileostomy, and 4,935 with urostomy. The underlying diseases for colostomy and ileostomy creations were primarily bowel cancer, 50.0% and 55.8% respectively, and additionally inflammatory bowel disease for 20.6% of ileostomies. The underlying cause for urostomy creation was mainly bladder cancer (85.0%). In the first year after ostomy creation (excl. index admission), the total mean healthcare cost was 329,200 SEK per person with colostomy, 330,800 SEK for ileostomy, and 254,100 SEK for urostomy (100 SEK was equivalent to 9.58 EUR). Although the annual mean healthcare cost decreased over time, it remained significantly elevated compared to controls, even after 10 years, with hospitalization being the main cost driver. The artificial opening was responsible for 19.3-22.8% of 30-day readmissions after ostomy creation and for 19.7-21.4% of hospitalizations during the entire study period. For the ileostomy group, dehydration was responsible for 13.0% of 30-day readmissions and 4.5% of hospitalization during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reported a high disease burden for persons with an ostomy. This had a substantial impact on the healthcare cost for at least ten years after ostomy creation. Working ability seemed to be negatively impacted, indicated by increased cost of sickness absence and early retirement. This calls for improved management and support of ostomy care for the benefit of the affected persons and for the cost of society.

Modified pull-through coloanal anastomosis to avoid permanent stomas and reduce postoperative complications for lower rectal tumors

BACKGROUND

We performed pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis immediately after sphincter-preserving ultralow anterior resection (ULAR) [pull-through ultra (PTU)] to avoid permanent stoma and reduce postoperative complications of lower rectal tumors. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of PTU versus non-PTU (stapled or hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma) after sphincter-preserving ULAR for lower rectal tumors.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed prospectively maintained data from 100 consecutive patients who underwent PTU (n = 29) or non-PTU (n = 71) after sphincter-preserving ULAR for rectal tumors between January 2011 and March 2023. In PTU, hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis was immediately performed using 16 stitches of 4-0 monofilament suture during primary surgery. The clinical outcomes were assessed. The primary outcomes were rates of permanent stomas and overall postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The PTU group was significantly less likely to require a permanent stoma than the non-PTU group (P < 0.01). None of the patients in the PTU group required permanent stoma and the rate of overall complications was significantly lower in the PTU group (P = 0.01). The median operative time was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.33) but the median operative time during the second stage was significantly shorter in the PTU group (P < 0.01). The rates of anastomotic leakage and complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III were comparable between the two groups. Diverting ileostomy was performed in two patients with an anastomotic leak in the PTU group. The PTU group was significantly less likely to require a diverting ileostomy than those in the non-PTU group (P < 0.01). The composite length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the PTU group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PTU via immediate coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal tumors is a safe alternative to the current sphincter-preserving ULAR with diverting ileostomy for patients who wish to avoid a stoma.

Peristomal Pseudoverrucous Lesions: A Rare Skin Complication of Colostomy

A 56-year-old female patient with colostomy presented with skin-colored cobblestone and verrucous asymptomatic papules on her peristomal skin for three months; she was referred to dermatology. Histopathology revealed irregular acanthosis, tongue-like extension of rete ridges of mature squamous epithelium without atypical morphology, hyperkeratosis, and inflammation of the skin. The histopathologic appearance was evaluated as compatible with pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia. No signs of malignancy, fungus, or koilocytes were found. The lesions were diagnosed as pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia by clinical and histopathologic findings. In this case report, we review pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia associated with colostomy.

Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Ostomy Skin Tool to the Brazilian Portuguese

PURPOSE

To adapt the Ostomy Skin Tool (discoloration, erosion, and tissue overgrowth) to the Brazilian culture and to analyze psychometric properties of the adapted version.

DESIGN

Psychometric (methodologic) evaluation of the instrument.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

Three ostomy/enterostomal therapy nurses evaluated the extent and severity of peristomal skin conditions in a sample of 109 adults 18 years or older with peristomal skin complications. These participants were receiving care in an ambulatory care center in outpatient health services in Sao Paulo and Curitiba, Brazil. In addition, interobserver reliability was measured using a group of 129 nurse participants who attended the Brazilian Congress of Stomatherapy held from November 12 to 15, 2017, in Belo Horizonte, a city located in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Nurse participants assessed the descriptions of peristomal skin complications of the Portuguese version, using the same photographs used in the original DET score, purposely placed out of original order.

METHODS

The study was performed in 2 stages. The instrument was translated into Brazilian Portuguese by 2 bilingual translators, and back-translated into English. The back-translated version was sent to one of the developers of the instrument for additional evaluation. During stage 2, content validity was evaluated by 7 nurses with expertise in ostomy and peristomal skin care. Convergent validity was evaluated by correlating the severity of peristomal skin complications to pain intensity. Discriminant validity was evaluated based on type and time of ostomy creation, presence of retraction, and preoperative stoma site marking. Finally, interrater reliability was evaluated using standardized photograph evaluation reproduced in the same sequence as the original English language version of the instrument, along with paired scores from assessment of adults living with an ostomy generated by an investigator and nurse data collectors.

RESULTS

The Content Validity Index for the Ostomy Skin Tool was 0.83. Levels of mild agreements were obtained for the nurses' observations in the evaluation of peristomal skin complications using standardized photographs (κ= 0.314). In contrast, moderate to almost perfect agreements were obtained when scores were compared in the clinical setting (κ= 0.48-0.93, according to the domains). Positive correlations between the instrument and pain intensity (r = 0.44; P = .001) indicate convergent validity of the adapted version of the Ostomy Skin Tool. In contrast, analysis of discriminant validity was mixed and definitive conclusions about this form of construct validity cannot be made based on this study.

CONCLUSION

This study supports convergent validity and interrater reliability of the adapted version of the Ostomy Skin Tool.

Assessment of risk factors and establishment of a nomogram model to predict early high-output ileostomy

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the prevalence and perioperative risk factors for early high-output ileostomy (EHOI) and developed a precise nomogram model to predict the occurrence of EHOI.

METHODS

140 patients who underwent ileostomy surgery at three hospitals in Wuhan, Hubei Province, between January 2022 and May 2022 were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. By using univariate and multifactorial logistic regression, independent risk variables for the development of EHOI were examined, and the nomogram model for predicting the risk of EHOI was created by using R software. The calibration curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) were used to evaluate the calibration and discrimination of the prediction model, Hosmer-Lemeshow to verify the fit of the model. Clinical impact curve (CIC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the model's clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients participated in the study, and the incidence of EHOI was 25.8% (34/132). The nomogram model incorporated 3 risk factors hypertension, drinking habits, and high white blood cell (WBC) count after surgery. The AUC was 0.742, and the nomogram showed great calibration and clinical validity by comparing the calibration curve, DCA, and CIC.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension, drinking, and high WBC was significantly correlated with EHOI. The nomogram model has great clinical value in predicting the EHOI.

Stomal and peristomal complications management: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Correctly identifying and managing stomal and peristomal complications are key to assisting individuals with an ostomy when they are facing challenges with self-care. Providers that are knowledgeable and experienced with stomal and peristomal care are vital when complications arise. Providing care that is consistent with findings in current high evidence-based literature supports the goal of providing optimal patient outcomes in a timely manner. The objective of this study was to explore stomal and peristomal that presented in an outpatient ostomy clinic and compare these interventions with information found in the literature.

METHOD

This retrospective study used a sample population of convenience that included adult patients aged ≥18 years who presented for stomal or peristomal complications in an outpatient ostomy clinic in northwest Ohio, US. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine the presenting stomal or peristomal complication(s) of each patient and treatment was provided or prescribed. The interventions were then compared with information found in the literature. Length of treatment and reasons for referral to the surgeon that created the stoma were also reviewed.

RESULTS

This study showed that interventions for adult individuals with a stomal or peristomal complications that presented to the clinic were consistent with that found in the literature. This study also sought to deliver information to healthcare providers that may not be directly involved in ostomy care, helping to increase their understanding of problems that patients with an ostomy may experience.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that interventions completed in this setting where the research took place was consistent with information found in literature.

Impact of gastric and bowel surgery on gastrointestinal drug delivery

General surgical procedures on the gastrointestinal tract are commonly performed worldwide. Surgical resections of the stomach, small intestine, or large intestine can have a significant impact on the anatomy and physiological environment of the gastrointestinal tract. These physiological changes can affect the effectiveness of orally administered formulations and drug absorption and, therefore, should be considered in rational drug formulation design for specific pathological conditions that are commonly associated with surgical intervention. For optimal drug delivery, it is important to understand how different surgical procedures affect the short-term and long-term functionality of the gastrointestinal tract. The significance of the surgical intervention is dependent on factors such as the specific region of resection, the degree of the resection, the adaptive and absorptive capacity of the remaining tissue, and the nature of the underlying disease. This review will focus on the common pathological conditions affecting the gastric and bowel regions that may require surgical intervention and the physiological impact of the surgery on gastrointestinal drug delivery. The pharmaceutical considerations for conventional and novel oral drug delivery approaches that may be impacted by general surgical procedures of the gastrointestinal tract will also be addressed.

Peristomal Skin Complications in Ileostomy and Colostomy Patients: What We Need to Know from a Public Health Perspective

BACKGROUND

Peristomal skin complications (PSCs) are the most common skin problems seen after ostomy surgery. They have a considerable impact on a patient's quality of life and contribute to a higher cost of care.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted, querying three databases. The analysis was performed on international studies focused on the clinical-epidemiological burden of PSCs in adult patients with ileostomy/colostomy.

RESULTS

Overall, 23 studies were considered. The main diseases associated with ostomy surgery were rectal, colon and gynecological cancers, inflammatory bowel diseases, diverticulitis, bowel obstruction and intestinal perforation. Erythema, papules, skin erosions, ulcers and vesicles were the most common PSCs for patients with an ostomy (or stoma). A PSCs incidence ranging from 36.3% to 73.4% was described. Skin complications increased length of stay (LOS) and rates of readmission within 120 days of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

PSCs data are still limited. A knowledge of their burden is essential to support health personnel and decision-makers in identifying the most appropriate responses to patients' needs. Proper management of these complications plays a fundamental role in improving the patient's quality of life. A multidisciplinary approach, as well as increased patient education and their empowerment, are priority measures to be implemented to foster a value-based healthcare.

Indications for, and outcomes of, end ileostomy revision procedures

AIM

Ileostomy complications have been reported in >70% of cases. Older studies have shown ileostomy revision to be required in 23%-38% of patients over a 5-10 year period. There is a paucity of recent data addressing ileostomy revision surgery. We aimed to review end ileostomy revisions in a tertiary centre and analyse indications, procedures performed, outcomes and risks for such surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review in a single institution colorectal referral practice. All patients aged >17 years who underwent a revision of an ileostomy at our institution from 2008 to 2019 were included. Indication for ileostomy revision, operative technique (parastomal vs. intra-abdominal) and outcomes including length of stay, readmission rates, wound complications, medical complications and rate of stoma re-revision were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients who underwent 72 end ileostomy revision procedures were included; 20 (27.8%) were re-revision procedures. The majority (76.4%) had their original ileostomy created for inflammatory bowel disease. Indications for ileostomy revision were stoma retraction (36.1%), prolapse (22.2%), stenosis (18.1%) and parastomal hernia (29.2%). Of stoma revisions, 55.6% were performed by a parastomal approach vs. 44.4% by an intra-abdominal approach. Procedures were a combination of laparotomy, laparoscopy or both. The average length of stay was statistically significantly lower in the parastomal approach revision group (2.3 days) compared to the intra-abdominal approach revision group (10.3 days) (P < 0.001). Readmission and wound complication rates were 6.9% and 15.3%, respectively, in the intra-abdominal approach group alone. Medical complication rates were 20.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

End ileostomy complications are common and surgical treatment may result in significant morbidity, readmission and reoperation. Patients should be counselled about these possibilities.

Mid-term Efficacy of Local Repair Using Modified Altemeier Technique for Stomal Prolapse: A Case Series

Introduction: Stomal prolapse (SP) is characterized by full-thickness protrusion of the bowel through the stoma site. The surgical procedures for SP include local repair, abdominal wall fixation, and stoma relocation. However, previous reports were mostly case reports or case series with a small number of patients and lacked long-term results. A modified Altemeier technique (MAT) has been used for the local repair of SP in our institution, and this study aimed to evaluate its mid-term efficacy.

Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent MAT for SP between August 2013 and December 2020. The variables included patient characteristics, type of stoma, indications of stoma creation, the time interval from stoma creation to prolapse, site of prolapse, reasons for SP surgery, perioperative variables, complications during SP surgery, and length of follow-up. Recurrence of SP was defined as the need for change in stoma care or re-protrusion of the stoma by more than 5 cm in length.

Results: Ten patients were included in this study. The median age at the time of SP surgery was 71.5 years. The indications of stoma creation included unresectable or recurrent intra-abdominal malignancies in four patients, diverting ileostomy with rectal cancer surgery in two, transverse colon cancer in one, gastric and rectal cancer in one, rectovaginal fistula in one, and non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia in one. The median interval from stoma creation to prolapse was 2.5 months. Six patients underwent elective SP surgery, and four patients underwent emergency surgery for incarcerated prolapse. The median operative time was 75.5 min. Postoperative complications that included transient mucosal ischemia and subcutaneous abscess occurred in one patient. There were four recurrences (40%), and the median time interval from surgery to recurrence was 4.5 months. Two patients underwent repeated MAT, one of whom underwent stomal reversal with laparotomy for re-recurrence. The median follow-up duration was 19 months.

Conclusion: MAT for SP is associated with a high recurrence rate in mid-term follow-up.

A close adherence to a stoma-therapeutic pathway improves immediate stoma-related outcomes and reduces the length of hospital stay

PURPOSE

New stoma creation is related to a wide range of implications and stoma-related complications could occur frequently. The aim was to assess the impact of a close stoma-therapeutic-care pathway (STCP) in terms of length of stay, autonomy in the management of the pouch, readmission rate, and stoma-related complications.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for colorectal disease and first stoma creation from January 2017 to December 2020 were analyzed. All patients enrolled had joined the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol.

RESULTS

Among 143 enrolled, 56 (40%) did not completely follow the STCP (group A), whereas 87 (60%) demonstrated strict compliance (group B). The hospital stay lasted 8 days in group B and 11.5 in group A (p = 0.001). The first look at the stoma needed 1 day in group B and 3 days in group A (p < 0.001), emptying the pouch 2 days in group B and 5 days in group A (p < 0.001). Finally, the ability to change the pouch was 3 days in group B and 6 days in group A (p < 0.001). Nine (16.1%) stoma-related complications were counted in group A and 16 (18.4%) in group B, and 30-day readmission was 10.1% in group B and 11.5% in group A (p = 0.82 and p = 1, respectively, not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

The STCP has been shown to reduce the hospital stay and to have a protective role making the patient autonomous in the management of the stoma.

Risk factors and pooled incidence of intestinal stoma complications: systematic review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The present systematic review aimed to identify, critically assess and summarize which risk factors might determine the onset of ostomy complications, describing a pooled incidence and stratified incidences by each identified risk factor.

METHODS

A systematic literature review with a meta-analysis of observational studies was performed by following the PRISMA statement and flow chart. The quality assessment of the included articles was performed through the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

Sixteen articles published between 1990 and 2018 focused on the risk factors related to intestinal stomal complications, and the performed analysis led to identifying influenceable and non-influenceable risk factors. The median of the NOS evaluation was 6 (IQR = 5.75-6). Among 10,520 included patients, the pooled incidence of stomal complications was 35%, ranging from 9% to 63%, regardless of the nature of the complications. Analysis of the sub-groups highlighted obesity and ostomy surgery performed via laparoscopy or emergency conditions have significant incidences, respectively, of 66% and 68%.

CONCLUSIONS

The pooled incidence of stomal complications requires greater attention for its relevant epidemiology. From the clinical point of view, patients with obesity and chronic conditions require more attention to prevent complications, possibly employing accurate educational interventions to enhance proper stoma management.

Biologic vs Synthetic Mesh for Parastomal Hernia Repair: Post Hoc Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Parastomal hernias are often repaired with mesh to reduce recurrences, but the presence of an ostomy increases the wound class from clean to clean-contaminated/contaminated and makes the choice of mesh more controversial than in a strictly clean case. We aimed to compare the outcomes of biologic and synthetic mesh for parastomal hernia repair.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a post hoc analysis of parastomal hernia repairs in a randomized trial comparing biologic and synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. Outcomes included rates of surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), reoperations, stoma/mesh-related adverse events, parastomal hernia recurrence rates (clinical, patient-reported, and radiographic) at 2 years, quality of life (EQ-5D, EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale, and Hernia-Related Quality of Life Survey), and hospital costs up to 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients underwent parastomal hernia repair (57 biologic (53%) and 51 synthetic (47%)). Demographic and hernia characteristics were similar between the two groups. No significant differences in SSOPI rates or reoperations were observed between mesh types. Four mesh erosions into an ostomy requiring reoperations (2 biologic vs 2 synthetic) occurred. At 2 years, parastomal hernia recurrence rates were similar for biologic and synthetic mesh (17 (29.8%) vs 13 (25.5%), respectively; P=.77). Overall and hernia-related quality of life improved from baseline and were similar between the two groups at 2 years. Median total hospital cost and median mesh cost were higher for biologic compared to synthetic mesh.

CONCLUSION

Biologic and synthetic mesh have similar wound morbidity, reoperations, 2-year hernia recurrence rates, and quality of life in parastomal hernia repairs. Cost should be considered in mesh choice for parastomal hernia repairs.

Ostomy and Continent Diversion Patient Bill of Rights: Research Validation of Standards of Care

An estimated 725,000 to 1 million people are living with an ostomy or continent diversion in the United States, and approximately 100,000 ostomy surgeries are performed each year in the United States. As a result of ostomy surgery, bodily waste is rerouted from its usual path because of malfunctioning parts of the urinary or digestive system. An ostomy can be temporary or permanent. The ostomy community is an underserved population of patients. United Ostomy Associations of America, Inc (UOAA), is a nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting quality of life for people with ostomies and continent diversions through information, support, advocacy, and collaboration. Over the years, UOAA has received hundreds of stories from people who have received inadequate care. In the United States, patients receiving medical care have certain health rights. For ostomy and continent diversion patients, these rights are known as the "You Matter! Know What to Expect and Know Your Rights-Ostomy and Continent Diversion Patient Bill of Rights" (PBOR). These rights define and provide a guide to patients and health care professionals as to what the best practices are when receiving and providing high-quality ostomy care during all phases of the surgical experience. This includes preoperative to postoperative care and throughout the life span when living with an ostomy or continent diversion. In 2020, the National Quality Forum released "The Care We Need: Driving Better Health Outcomes for People and Communities," a National Quality Task Force report that provides a road map where every person in every community can expect to consistently and predictably receive high-quality care by 2030 (thecareweneed.org). One of the core strategic objectives this report stated is to ensure appropriate, safe, and accessible care. Actionable opportunities to drive change include accelerating adoption of leading practices. The adoption of the PBOR best practices will drive the health care quality improvement change needed for the ostomy and continent diversion population. There are concerns in the ostomy and continent diversion communities among patients and health care professionals that the standards of care outlined in the PBOR are not occurring across the United States in all health care settings. There are further concerns stated by health care professionals that the patient-centered recommendations outlined in the PBOR need to be strengthened by being supported with available published health care evidence. The work of this task force was to bring together members of UOAA's Advocacy Committee, members of the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society (WOCN Society) Public Policy and Advocacy Committee, and representatives from surgical organizations and industry to create a systemic change by validating through evidence the Ostomy and Continent Diversion PBOR. Through the work of the task force, each component of the PBOR has been substantiated as evidence-based. Thus, this article validates the PBOR as a guideline for high-quality standards of ostomy care. We show that when patients receive the standards of care as outlined in the PBOR, there is improved quality of care. We can now recognize that until every ostomy or continent diversion patient receives these health care rights, in all health care settings, will they truly be realized and respected as human rights in the United States and thus people living with an ostomy or continent diversion will receive "the care they need."