Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Beyond HOKUSAI

Abelacimab in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: The Right Drug at the Right Time for the Right Purpose. A Comprehensive Review

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a devastating complication of cancer that can significantly impact a patient's health and life. The incidence of CAT is approximately 20%, and 1 in 5 cancer patients will develop CAT annually. Indeed, CAT can promote pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, leading to increased morbidity and mortality that dramatically impact survival. CAT can also provoke delay or discontinuation of anticancer treatment, which may result in a lack of treatment efficacy and high costs for patients, institutions, and society. Current guidelines advocate direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as the first-line anticoagulant option in CAT. Compared to low-molecular-weight-heparins (LMWHs), DOACs are advantageous in that they typically have an oral route of administration, do not require laboratory monitoring, and have a more predictable anticoagulant effect. However, in patients with thrombocytopenia, renal failure, or those receiving anticancer regimens with potential for drug-drug interactions, LMWH is still the mainstay of care. The main limitation of current anticoagulant agents is related to bleeding risk (BR), both for DOACs and LMWHs. Specifically, DOACs have been associated with high BR in gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers. In this challenging scenario, abelacimab, an anti-factor XI agent, could represent a viable option in the management of CAT due to its "hemostasis sparing" effect. The safe profile of abelacimab could be useful in patients with active malignancy and CAT, as long-term anticoagulant therapy is often required. Two ongoing international phase III trials (Aster and Magnolia) compare abelacimab with the standard of care (i.e., apixaban in patients with CAT and dalteparin in those with CAT and high BR, respectively). Abelacimab is a new and attractive anticoagulant for the management of CAT, especially in the insidious and critical scenario of active cancer patients with venous thromboembolism and high BR. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the updated evidence on the performance of DOACs and LMWHs in the treatment of CAT and to focus on the potential role of abelacimab in CAT and its promising associated clinical trials.

In Vitro Antithrombotic, Antitumor and Antiangiogenic Activities of Green Tea Polyphenols and Its Main Constituent Epigallocatechin-3-gallate

The balance between embolic risk and bleeding represents a clinical challenge in cancer patient treatment, encouraging studies on adjuvant oncologic treatments. Thereby, this study evaluated the in vitro effect of green tea extract (GTE) and epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on hemostasis modulation and the antineoplastic effect on melanoma cells (B16-F10) by applying platelet aggregation, angiogenesis and viability cell assays. The results displayed a significant platelet antiaggregant effect, corresponding to 50 and 80% for the extract and EGCG, respectively, compared to the negative control. Furthermore, both GTE and EGCG exhibited antitumor effects by reducing melanoma cell growth by 25 and 50%, respectively, verified by cellular apoptosis. Regarding angiogenesis, these substances inhibited blood vessel formation, reaching about 25% and 99% for GTE and EGCG at 100 μg/mL, respectively. Moreover, TNF-α cell stimulation evidenced VEGF and IL-8 secretion inhibition at 55 and 20% with GTE, while EGCG promoted an inhibition around 78% for both VEGF and IL-8. The results indicate the promising performance of GTE and EGCG as an option for treating cancer and its side effects. Nonetheless, further studies are required to elucidate their action mechanism on clotting, cell death and angiogenesis.

Prognostic value of plasma D-dimer levels in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Plasma D-dimer is of great significance for the clinical exclusion of tumor-related thrombosis. Previous studies have shown its predictive role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemotherapy. However, whether pretreatment D-dimer could predict the efficacy and prognosis in NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear.

METHODS

Advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 2015 and March 2019 were enrolled. Patients were divided into a pretreatment normal D-dimer group (≤0.5 µg/mL) and high D-dimer group (>0.5 µg/mL). Optimization-based approach was applied to balance baseline covariates between the 2 groups, including age, sex, histological type, smoking history, stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS), lines of treatment, ICI drugs, brain metastasis, treatment type, and D-dimer levels. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used for analyzing survival data, including progression-free survival (PFS, the time from initial ICI treatment to PD or death), overall survival (OS, the time between initial ICI treatment and death), and hazard ratio (HR). Follow-up of all patients was performed by searching electronic medical records and counseling telephone. The follow-up cut-off date was July 6, 2020.

RESULTS

This study included 277 advanced NSCLC patients. Among the enrolled patients, 23.1% were female, 64.6% had non-squamous cell lung cancer, and 79.4% were stage IV. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that pretreatment high D-dimer levels were independently associated with shortened PFS and OS (P<0.01). Subgroup analysis confirmed that pretreatment high D-dimer levels were associated with poor prognosis in most subsets. After balancing baseline covariates between the high D-dimer group and normal D-dimer group, the results indicated that patients with pretreatment high D-dimer levels had significantly shorter PFS [median: 6.4 vs. 11.5 months; HR, 1.70; 95% confidence ratio (CI): 1.25-2.37; P<0.001] and OS (median: 12.7 vs. 30.4 months; HR, 2.29; 95% CI: 1.54-3.41; P<0.001) than those with pretreatment normal D-dimer levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment plasma D-dimer could serve as a convenient prognostic biomarker for advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICI treatment. Patients with pretreatment high D-dimer levels may have poor PFS and OS.

Anticoagulation Therapy in Cancer Patients with Thrombosis in the Outpatient Sector of Germany (The CERTIFICAT Initiative)-German Practice of Anticoagulation Therapy of Cancer Patients with Thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

 This article aims to investigate the reality of anticoagulation treatment for cancer patients with thrombosis in the outpatient sector of Germany.

METHODS

 For the analysis period 2012 to 2015, anonymized data from 4.1 million statutory insured patients were analyzed. Cancer patients with incident thrombosis and an outpatient prescription of anticoagulant drugs were identified and evaluated for three subsequent quarters with regard to anticoagulant use.

RESULTS

 A total of 7,313 cancer patients with incident thrombosis (ICD-10: I80*) were evaluated. About, 90% of patients with thromboses were diagnosed and treated in the ambulatory sector. More than 80% of the prescriptions were issued by general practitioners. And 57% of patients were anticoagulated predominantly (>50% of the time) with different low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), 24% predominantly with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and 17% with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Anticoagulants were prescribed for an average of 4.5 months. LMWH had a substantially longer prescription period (90-135 days) than VKA (53 days) or DOAC (47 days). Gastrointestinal bleeding in conjunction with hospitalization was documented in 1.76% of patients with a range of 1.3 to 3% for the different LMWHs.

CONCLUSION

 The prescription practice documented by this representative and comprehensive evaluation demonstrates an anticoagulation duration in accordance with the guidelines, although the choice of the respective anticoagulant was often not in compliance with the contemporary label or guidelines.

Management of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Unmet Needs and Future Perspectives

Patients with cancer are at a high risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Increased risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding complications are two major challenges associated with therapeutic anticoagulation in these patients. Long-term therapy with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) has been the standard of care for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE given its favorable risk–benefit ratio in comparison with vitamin K antagonists. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which offer the convenience of oral administration and have a rapid onset of action, have recently emerged as a new treatment option for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CT). Randomized clinical trial data with head-to-head comparisons between DOACs and LMWHs showed that overall, DOACs have a similar efficacy profile but a higher risk of bleeding was observed in some of these studies. This review aims to identify unmet needs in the treatment of CT. We discuss important considerations for clinicians tailoring anticoagulation (1) drug–drug interactions, (2) risk of bleeding (e.g., gastrointestinal bleeding), (3) thrombocytopenia, hematological malignancies, (4) metastatic or primary brain tumors, and (5) renal impairment. Additional research is warranted in several clinical scenarios to help clinicians on the best therapeutic approach.

Clinical controversies in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of malignancy. Patients with cancer exhibit risk factors for both recurrent VTE and major or minor bleeding. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an attractive treatment option; however, there is a lack of consensus among national guidelines for choice between DOACs and LMWH, agent selection, dosing strategy, and duration of anticoagulation. Characteristics of the thrombotic event, the malignancy, the patient, and the anticoagulant must be considered. A systematic search of online databases was performed to identify literature on the management of cancer-associated VTE. Multiple controversies remain surrounding the optimal treatment of cancer-associated VTE.

Application of an elevated plasma D-dimer cut-off value improves prognosis prediction of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Tumor-related coagulation dysfunction has been reported to be closely associated with poor prognosis. The present study is aimed to evaluate the prognostic prediction of an elevated plasma D-dimer cut-off value in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 233 patients initially diagnosed with advanced NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed, an elevated plasma cut-off value 981 ng/mL of D-dimer, which was instead of the clinical cut-off value 500 mg/mL, was used to determine the high and low. Univariate analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-ranking test, and the multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard regression model were performed.

Results

Results showed when using the D-dimer value of 500 ng/mL as an evaluation standard, there was no significant difference in gender, age, smoking status, histopathology and overall survival rate between normal D-dimer (≤500 ng/mL) and high D-dimer (>500 ng/mL) group. However, when the evaluation standard for plasma D-dimer was set at 981 ng/mL, the age distribution of the high D-dimer (>981 ng/mL) group was significantly different from the normal D-dimer (≤981 ng/mL) group. Moreover, the overall survival rate in the high D-dimer (>981 ng/mL) group was significantly lower than that in the normal D-dimer (≤981 ng/mL) group.

Conclusions

The present study implied that increasing the plasma D-dimer cut-off value to 981 ng/mL is more beneficial to prognosis prediction in advanced NSCLC.

Long-Term Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT) Beyond 6 Months in the Medical Practice: USCAT, a 432-Patient Retrospective Non-Interventional Study

Background: extended anticoagulant therapy beyond the initial 6 months is suggested in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) and active cancer. Few data are available on patient management and outcomes on the period between 6 and 12 months after the venous thromboembolism (VTE) event. Objectives: our objective was to document patient management and outcomes beyond 6 months and up to 12 months in CAT patients initially treated for 6 months with tinzaparin. Methods: adult CAT patients with a cancer still alive at the end of an initial 6-month treatment period were eligible to participate in this retrospective non-interventional French multicenter study. Results: a total of 432 patients aged 66.5 ± 12.7 years were available to participate in this study. Out of the patients included in the study, the anticoagulant treatment was maintained in 348 of 422 documented patients (82.5%) while it was discontinued in 74 (17.5%) patients (before the end or at the end of the initial 6-month treatment period). Between 6 and 12 months, 24 patients (5.7%) experienced VTE recurrence, while 21 (5.1%) patients had clinically relevant bleeding, 11 patients (2.7%) had major bleeding and 96 patients (22.3%) died, mostly from cancer. VTE recurrence was more frequent in patients with lung (14.3%) and colorectal cancer (6.0%) while major bleeding was more frequent in patients with colorectal cancer (6.0%). Conclusion: clinical outcomes were consistent with previous observations and variable according to the type of cancer. Further clinical research is required to orient the management of patients with CAT beyond 6 months based on cancer-specific treatment strategies.

Direct oral anticoagulant versus low-molecular-weight heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Cancer associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) results in significant morbidity and mortality. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been standard of care for treatment of cancer-associated VTE, however direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are emerging as alternative treatment options.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the benefits and harms of DOACs versus LMWH for treatment of VTE in cancer.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to April 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing DOACs with LMWH for treatment of VTE in cancer patients.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Four good-quality RCTs, met inclusion criteria. Compared with LMWH, DOACs were associated with lower rates of VTE recurrence (RR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.44-0.87; P = 0.006), and DVT recurrence (RR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.4-0.94; P = 0.02) but not PE recurrence (RR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51-1.04; P = 0.08), in cancer patients. However, the risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) (RR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11-2.24; P = 0.01), and major bleeding in gastrointestinal cancer (RR 2.55; 95% CI 1.24-5.27, P = 0.01), were higher with DOACs. The risk of overall major bleeding (RR 1.33; 95% CI: 0.84-2.1; P = 0.22), all-cause mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.84-1.17; P = 0.92), VTE-related mortality (RR: 1; 95% CI: 0.29-3.44; P = 1) and bleeding-related mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.17-2.91; P = 0.63), were similar in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Among cancer patients with VTE, treatment with DOACs is associated with a significant reduction of VTE and DVT recurrence, compared to LMWH. These benefits were offset by an increased risk of CRNMB, and major bleeding in gastrointestinal cancer.

Comprehensive Outpatient Management of Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Can Primary Care Do This? A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

The evidence for outpatient management of hemodynamically stable, low-risk patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) is mounting. Guidance in identifying patients who are eligible for outpatient (ambulatory) care is available in the literature and society guidelines. Less is known about who can identify patients eligible for outpatient management and in what clinical practice settings.

OBJECTIVE

To answer the question, "Can primary care do this?" (provide comprehensive outpatient management of low-risk PE).

METHODS

We undertook a narrative review of the literature on the outpatient management of acute PE focusing on site of care. We searched the English-language literature in PubMed and Embase from January 1, 1950, through July 15, 2019.

RESULTS

We identified 26 eligible studies. We found no studies that evaluated comprehensive PE management in a primary care clinic or general practice setting. In 19 studies, the site-of-care decision making occurred in the Emergency Department (or after a short period of supplemental observation) and in 7 studies the decision occurred in a specialty clinic. We discuss the components of care involved in the diagnosis, outpatient eligibility assessment, treatment, and follow-up of ambulatory patients with acute PE.

DISCUSSION

We see no formal reason why a trained primary care physician could not provide comprehensive care for select patients with low-risk PE. Leading obstacles include lack of ready access to advanced pulmonary imaging and the time constraints of a busy outpatient clinic.

CONCLUSION

Until studies establish safe parameters of such a practice, the question "Can primary care do this?" must remain open.