Comparison of Surgical Outcomes and Recurrence Rates of Cystic and Solid Vestibular Schwannomas

Outcomes of Near-Total and Subtotal Resection of Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate tumor control and facial nerve outcomes after gross-total (GTR), near-total (NTR), and subtotal resection (STR) of sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VS).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched in August 2021 through inception following PRISMA guidelines.

REVIEW METHODS

English language articles reporting tumor control and facial nerve outcomes of adults (≥18 years) with NTR and STR of VS were evaluated. Study characteristics, demographics data, tumor characteristics, type of surgical intervention, and outcome measures on tumor control and facial nerve function were collected. Pooled relative risk (RR) estimates for tumor recurrence and facial nerve outcomes were calculated and stratified by extent of resection.

RESULTS

From an initial search of 2504 articles, 48 studies were included in the analysis. When comparing 1108 patients who underwent NTR to 3349 patients with GTR, the pooled RR of recurrence in the NTR cohort was 2.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-5.24, P = .0002). When comparing 1016 patients who underwent STR to 6171 patients with GTR, the pooled RR of recurrence in the STR cohort was 11.50 (95% CI 6.64-19.92, P < .0001). Estimates for risk of tumor regrowth for less-than-complete resection are presented. There was no elevated risk of adverse facial nerve outcome (defined as House-Brackmann grade III and above) in each category of extent of resection compared to GTR.

CONCLUSION

Extent of resection predicts risk of tumor recurrence/regrowth following microsurgical resection. Favorable facial nerve outcome should be weighed against the increased risk of regrowth and the potential need for further treatment.

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes in Cystic Versus Solid Vestibular Schwannoma in a Multi-institutional Cohort

OBJECTIVE

Cystic vestibular schwannomas (cVSs) have more variable and less favorable clinical outcomes after microsurgical resection compared with solid VS (sVS). This study compares the preoperative presentation and postoperative outcomes between cVS and sVS.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two tertiary skull base referral centers.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients who underwent VS resection from 2016 to 2021 were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses compared differences in baseline symptoms and postoperative outcomes between cVS and sVS.

RESULTS

There were a total of 315 patients (64% female; mean age, 54 yrs) and 46 (15%) were cystic. cVS were significantly larger than sVS (maximum diameter, 28 vs. 18 mm, p < 0.001) and had higher rates of dysphagia and dysphonia preoperatively (p < 0.02). cVSs were more likely to undergo translabyrinthine resection (76 vs. 50%, p = 0.001) and have a higher rate of subtotal resection (STR) compared with sVS (30 vs. 13%, p = 0.003). At latest follow-up, fewer cVS achieved good facial nerve (FN) outcome (House-Brackmann [HB] I/II) (80 vs. 90%, p = 0.048). Subanalysis of cVS and sVS matched in tumor size, and surgical approach did not show differences in the rate of STR or FN outcomes (HB I/II, 82 vs. 78%, p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

In this large multi-institutional series, cVSs represent a distinct entity and are characterized by larger tumor size and higher incidence of atypical symptoms. Although cVSs were more likely to undergo STR and portend worse FN outcomes than sVSs, this may be due to their larger tumor size rather than the presence of the cystic component.

Long-term results of upfront, single-session Gamma Knife radiosurgery for large cystic vestibular schwannomas

Anecdotally, cystic vestibular schwannomas (cVSs) are regarded to have unpredictable biologic activity with poorer clinical results, and most studies showed a less favorable prognosis following surgery. While stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established therapeutic option for small- to medium-sized VSs, cVSs are often larger, thus making upfront SRS more complicated. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront SRS for large cVSs. The authors reviewed the data of 54 patients who received upfront, single-session Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with a diagnosis of large cVS (> 4 cm3). Patients with neurofibromatosis type 2, multiple VSs, or recurrent VSs and < 24 months of clinical and neuroimaging follow-up were excluded. Hearing loss (48.1%) was the primary presenting symptom. The majority of cVSs were Koos grade IV (66.7%), and the most prevalent cyst pattern was "mixed pattern of small and big cysts" (46.3%). The median time between diagnosis and GKRS was 12 months (range, 1-147 months). At GKRS, the median cVS volume was 6.95 cm3 (range, 4.1-22 cm3). The median marginal dose was 12 Gy (range, 10-12 Gy). The mean radiological and clinical follow-up periods were 62.2 ± 34.04 months (range, 24-169 months) and 94.9 ± 45.41 months (range, 24-175 months), respectively. At 2, 6, and 12 years, the tumor control rates were 100%, 95.7%, and 85.0%, respectively. Tumor shrinkage occurred in 92.6% of patients (n = 50), tumor volume remained stable in 5.6% of patients (n = 3), and tumor growth occurred in 1.9% of patients (n = 1). At a median follow-up of 53.5 months, the pre-GKRS tumor volume significantly decreased to 2.35 cm3 (p < 0.001). While Koos grade 3 patients had a greater possibility of attaining higher volume reduction, "multiple small thick-walled cyst pattern" and smaller tumor volumes decreased the likelihood of achieving higher volume reduction. Serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robertson Scale I-II) was present in 16.7% of patients prior to GKRS and it was preserved in all of these patients following GKRS. After GKRS, 1.9% of patients (n = 1) had new-onset trigeminal neuralgia. There was no new-onset facial palsy, hemifacial spasm, or hydrocephalus. Contrary to what was believed, our findings suggest that upfront GKRS seems to be a safe and effective treatment option for large cVSs.