1
|
Zanin J, Vaisberg J, Swann S, Rance G. Evaluating benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with hearing loss using behavioural and predictive metrics. Int J Audiol 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38767343 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2354500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the benefit of remote-microphone (RM) systems for adults with sensory hearing loss. DESIGN Speech recognition in quiet and in background noise was assessed. Participants with hearing loss underwent testing in two device conditions: hearing aids (HAs) alone and HAs with a RM. Normal hearing participants completed testing in the unaided condition. Predictive speech intelligibility modelling using the Hearing-Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI) was also performed on recordings of HA processed test material. STUDY SAMPLE Twenty adults with sensory hearing loss and 10 adults with normal hearing participated. RESULTS Speech recognition for participants with hearing loss improved significantly when using the RM compared to HAs alone fit to Phonak's proprietary prescription. Largest benefits were observed in the most challenging conditions. At the lowest signal-to-noise ratio, participants with hearing loss using a RM outperformed normal hearing listeners. Predicted intelligibility scores produced by HASPI were strongly correlated to behavioural results. CONCLUSIONS Adults using HAs who have significant difficulties understanding speech in noise will experience considerable benefits with the addition of a RM. Improvements in speech recognition were observed for all participants using RM systems, including those with relatively mild hearing loss. HASPI modelling reliably predicted the speech perception difficulties experienced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Zanin
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jonathan Vaisberg
- Innovation Centre Toronto, Sonova Canda Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Swann
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gary Rance
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Desai N, Beukes EW, Manchaiah V, Mahomed-Asmail F, Swanepoel DW. Consumer Perspectives on Improving Hearing Aids: A Qualitative Study. Am J Audiol 2024:1-12. [PMID: 38768085 DOI: 10.1044/2024_aja-23-00245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Hearing aids play a pivotal role in mitigating the impact of hearing loss, yet their adoption and consistent usage remains suboptimal. Understanding the hearing aid needs of individuals with hearing loss is important to support uptake, use, and outcomes. The current study describes users' perspectives on how hearing aids can be improved. METHOD A cross-sectional, qualitative, content analysis design was used for an open-ended question from an online survey, exploring user perspectives on hearing aid improvements. Participants were adult hearing aid users in the United States, surveyed from the HearingTracker and Lexie Hearing user database. RESULTS A total of 628 participants (Mage = 66 years) were surveyed. The majority of participants used bilateral, behind-the-ear hearing aids that were obtained either through a hearing health care professional or online. Three domains, highlighting areas for hearing aid improvement, were identified. (a) The hearing aid features domain described user issues surrounding physical appearance and fit, general features, streaming, battery functionality, adjustments, smartphone applications, and hearing aid-related accessories. There was dissatisfaction with aesthetics and functionality, with a notable desire for improvements in physical appearance and fit (n = 161), and features to improve self-efficacy. (b) The sound quality domain described user issues surrounding sound perception and difficult situations. Participants highlighted unmet needs for clarity, especially in noisy environments (n = 143). (c) The service-delivery domain described user issues surrounding audiology services and general satisfaction, with criticisms centered on the high cost of hearing aids (n = 193) and the credibility of hearing health care professionals. CONCLUSIONS Hearing aid users appreciated current technological advances but expressed a need for improvements, to better align devices with their requirements. Key areas included physical aesthetics, user control over device adjustments, sound clarity, cost accessibility, and trust between the user and hearing health care professional. Future designs should focus on features enhancing user autonomy and self-efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabeelah Desai
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Eldré W Beukes
- Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and University of Pretoria, South Africa
- Vision and Hearing Sciences Research Group, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Vinaya Manchaiah
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and University of Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
- UCHealth Hearing and Balance, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora
- Department of Speech and Hearing, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India
| | - Faheema Mahomed-Asmail
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and University of Pretoria, South Africa
| | - De Wet Swanepoel
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and University of Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ellis GM, Crukley J, Souza PE. The Effects of Signal to Noise Ratio, T60 , Wide-Dynamic Range Compression Speed, and Digital Noise Reduction in a Virtual Restaurant Setting. Ear Hear 2024; 45:760-774. [PMID: 38254265 PMCID: PMC11141238 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hearing aid processing in realistic listening environments is difficult to study effectively. Often the environment is unpredictable or unknown, such as in wearable aid trials with subjective report by the wearer. Some laboratory experiments create listening environments to exert tight experimental control, but those environments are often limited by physical space, a small number of sound sources, or room absorptive properties. Simulation techniques bridge this gap by providing greater experimental control over listening environments, effectively bringing aspects of the real-world into the laboratory. This project used simulation to study the effects of wide-dynamic range compression (WDRC) and digital noise reduction (DNR) on speech intelligibility in a reverberant environment with six spatialized competing talkers. The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of WDRC and DNR in a complex listening environment using virtual auditory space techniques. DESIGN Participants of greatest interest were listeners with hearing impairment. A group of listeners with clinically normal hearing was included to assess the effects of the simulation absent the complex effects of hearing loss. Virtual auditory space techniques were used to simulate a small restaurant listening environment with two different reverberation times (0.8 and 1.8 sec) in a range of signal to noise ratios (SNRs) (-8.5 to 11.5 dB SNR). Six spatialized competing talkers were included to further enhance realism. A hearing aid simulation was used to examine the degree to which speech intelligibility was affected by slow and fast WDRC in conjunction with the presence or absence of DNR. The WDRC and DNR settings were chosen to be reasonable estimates of hearing aids currently available to consumers. RESULTS A WDRC × DNR × Hearing Status interaction was observed, such that DNR was beneficial for speech intelligibility when combined with fast WDRC speeds, but DNR was detrimental to speech intelligibility when WDRC speeds were slow. The pattern of the WDRC × DNR interaction was observed for both listener groups. Significant main effects of reverberation time and SNR were observed, indicating better performance with lower reverberation times and more positive SNR. CONCLUSIONS DNR reduced low-amplitude noise before WDRC-amplified the low-intensity portions of the signal, negating one potential downside of fast WDRC and leading to an improvement in speech intelligibility in this simulation. These data suggest that, in some real-world environments that include both reverberation and noise, older listeners with hearing impairment may find speech to be more intelligible if DNR is activated when the hearing aid has fast compression time constants. Additional research is needed to determine the appropriate DNR strength and to confirm results in wearable hearing aids and a wider range of listening environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory M Ellis
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeff Crukley
- Data Science and Statistics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behavior, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pamela E Souza
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
- Knowles Hearing Center, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sabin AT, McElhone D, Gauger D, Rabinowitz B. Modeling the Intelligibility Benefit of Active Noise Cancelation in Hearing Devices That Improve Signal-to-Noise Ratio. Trends Hear 2024; 28:23312165241260029. [PMID: 38831646 PMCID: PMC11149449 DOI: 10.1177/23312165241260029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The extent to which active noise cancelation (ANC), when combined with hearing assistance, can improve speech intelligibility in noise is not well understood. One possible source of benefit is ANC's ability to reduce the sound level of the direct (i.e., vent-transmitted) path. This reduction lowers the "floor" imposed by the direct path, thereby allowing any increases to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) created in the amplified path to be "realized" at the eardrum. Here we used a modeling approach to estimate this benefit. We compared pairs of simulated hearing aids that differ only in terms of their ability to provide ANC and computed intelligibility metrics on their outputs. The difference in metric scores between simulated devices is termed the "ANC Benefit." These simulations show that ANC Benefit increases as (1) the environmental sound level increases, (2) the ability of the hearing aid to improve SNR increases, (3) the strength of the ANC increases, and (4) the hearing loss severity decreases. The predicted size of the ANC Benefit can be substantial. For a moderate hearing loss, the model predicts improvement in intelligibility metrics of >30% when environments are moderately loud (>70 dB SPL) and devices are moderately capable of increasing SNR (by >4 dB). It appears that ANC can be a critical ingredient in hearing devices that attempt to improve SNR in loud environments. ANC will become more and more important as advanced SNR-improving algorithms (e.g., artificial intelligence speech enhancement) are included in hearing devices.
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhou M, Soleimanpour R, Mahajan A, Anderson S. Hearing Aid Delay Effects on Neural Phase Locking. Ear Hear 2024; 45:142-150. [PMID: 37434283 PMCID: PMC10718218 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study was designed to examine the effects of hearing aid delay on the neural representation of the temporal envelope. It was hypothesized that the comb-filter effect would disrupt neural phase locking, and that shorter hearing aid delays would minimize this effect. DESIGN Twenty-one participants, ages 50 years and older, with bilateral mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss were recruited through print advertisements in local senior newspapers. They were fitted with three different sets of hearing aids with average processing delays that ranged from 0.5 to 7 msec. Envelope-following responses (EFRs) were recorded to a 50-msec /da/ syllable presented through a speaker placed 1 meter in front of the participants while they wore the three sets of hearing aids with open tips. Phase-locking factor (PLF) and stimulus-to-response (STR) correlations were calculated from these recordings. RESULTS Recordings obtained while wearing hearing aids with a 0.5-msec processing delay showed higher PLF and STR correlations compared with those with either 5-msec or 7-msec delays. No differences were noted between recordings of hearing aids with 5-msec and 7-msec delays. The degree of difference between hearing aids was greater for individuals who had milder degrees of hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS Hearing aid processing delays disrupt phase locking due to mixing of processed and unprocessed sounds in the ear canal when using open domes. Given previous work showing that better phase locking correlates with better speech-in-noise performance, consideration should be given to reducing hearing aid processing delay in the design of hearing aid algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Zhou
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Roksana Soleimanpour
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Aakriti Mahajan
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Samira Anderson
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
- Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mothemela B, Manchaiah V, Mahomed-Asmail F, Graham M, Swanepoel DW. Factors Associated With Hearing Aid Outcomes Including Social Networks, Self-Reported Mental Health, and Service Delivery Models. Am J Audiol 2023; 32:823-831. [PMID: 37669616 DOI: 10.1044/2023_aja-22-00206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to identify and describe factors that influence hearing aid outcomes including social networks, self-reported mental health, and service delivery models. METHOD A prospective cross-sectional online survey was sent to hearing aid users recruited through an online platform (http://www.hearingtracker.com) between October and November 2021. The survey contained questions on patient demographics, audiological variables, general health and social factors, and self-reported hearing aid outcomes using the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Regression models evaluated potential contributing factors of hearing aid outcomes on the IOI-HA. RESULTS Three hundred ninety-eight hearing aid users completed the survey with an average age of 66.6 (SD = 13.0) years, of which 59.3% were male. Positive contributing factors of hearing aid outcomes (IOI-HA total score) were social network of people with hearing loss with hearing aids (p < .010; Exp[B] = 0.03, 95% CI [0.01, 0.1]), self-reported mental health (p < .05; Exp[B] = 0.6, 95% CI [0.01, 1.2]), work situation (p < .001; Exp[B] = 1.9, 95% CI [0.7, 2.8]), quality of life (p < .005; Exp[B] = 1.2, 95% CI [0.3, 1.1]), and self-reported hearing difficulty (p < .02; Exp[B] = 0.8, 95% CI [0.2, 1.5]). Negative contributing factors of hearing aid outcomes included social networks of people with hearing loss without hearing aids (p < .001; Exp[B] = -0.1, 95% CI [-0.2, -0.2]) and service delivery model of private or university clinic compared to big-box retailers (p < .001; Exp[B] = -1.6, 95% CI [-2.7, -0.7]). CONCLUSIONS Novel factors including social network of persons with hearing loss who use hearing aids, self-reported mental health, service delivery model, and work situation are significant contributors to hearing aid outcomes. These newly identified factors can inform public hearing health promotion and individualized audiological care to optimize hearing aid outcomes. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24060486.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bopane Mothemela
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab (a collaborative initiative between the University of Colorado School of Medicine and University of Pretoria), Aurora, CO
| | - Vinaya Manchaiah
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab (a collaborative initiative between the University of Colorado School of Medicine and University of Pretoria), Aurora, CO
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
- UCHealth Hearing and Balance Clinic, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora
- Department of Speech and Hearing, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India
| | - Faheema Mahomed-Asmail
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab (a collaborative initiative between the University of Colorado School of Medicine and University of Pretoria), Aurora, CO
| | - Marien Graham
- Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, University of Pretoria, South Africa
| | - De Wet Swanepoel
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab (a collaborative initiative between the University of Colorado School of Medicine and University of Pretoria), Aurora, CO
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Plyler PN, Razavi S, Hausladen J, Humphrey E. Effectiveness of Television Streaming on Hearing Aid User Performance and Satisfaction in Quiet and in Noise. Am J Audiol 2023:1-14. [PMID: 37931091 DOI: 10.1044/2023_aja-23-00169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of television (TV) streaming on hearing aid user performance and satisfaction in quiet and in noise. METHOD Twenty experienced hearing aid users were evaluated in quiet and in noise (5 dB SNR) under three hearing aid conditions: hearing aids, streaming with hearing aid microphones attenuated by 6 dB, and streaming with hearing aid microphones muted. The audiovisual Connected Speech Test served as the signal, and the ipsilateral competing message from the Synthetic Sentence Identification-Ipsilateral Competing Message (SSI-ICM) served as the noise. Measures of speech understanding, satisfaction with sound quality and clarity, and preference were obtained. RESULTS Speech understanding was significantly better in quiet than in noise, and streaming improved performance in noise when the hearing aid microphones were muted. Sound quality satisfaction was significantly better in quiet than in noise but was not impacted significantly by the hearing aid settings. Speech clarity satisfaction was significantly better in quiet than in noise, and streaming improved satisfaction in noise when the hearing aid microphones were muted. More participants preferred streaming with the microphones muted in quiet, in noise, and overall; however, results did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Hearing aid users did not benefit from TV streaming with the microphones attenuated or muted when listening in quiet. TV streaming was more beneficial to hearing aid users when listening in noise with the microphones muted. Hearing aid users should be counseled on the impact of the hearing aid microphone settings when using a TV streamer, particularly in noise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick N Plyler
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville
| | - Sarah Razavi
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville
| | - Jennifer Hausladen
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville
| | - Elizabeth Humphrey
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saleh HK, Folkeard P, Liao S, Scollie S. Development and initial evaluation of the Hearing Aid Attribute and Feature Importance Evaluation (HAFIE) questionnaire. Int J Audiol 2023:1-10. [PMID: 37712694 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2253498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and validate a novel questionnaire aimed at providing a structured, evidence-based methodology for hearing aid recommendation and selection using self-reported importance ratings for different modern hearing aid features. DESIGN The initial questionnaire items were created through a concept mapping approach that involved input from hearing aid users. Hearing care professional focus groups (n = 10) were conducted to assess questionnaire content and design, and to guide modifications. Validation of this initial 34-item version of the questionnaire was conducted using an anonymous online survey tool (Qualtrics). Exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure of the dataset, using principal axis factoring. Questionnaire reliability and inter-item correlation were assessed. Items with low factor loading and high cross-loading were removed. STUDY SAMPLE Two hundred and eighteen adult participants with a self-reported hearing loss (median age = 48 years, range = 18-95 years) completed the questionnaire. RESULTS Analysis and item removal resulted in a 28-item questionnaire. Three factors were identified, dividing the hearing aid features into the subscales: "Advanced connectivity & streaming", "Physical attributes & usability", and "Sound quality & intelligibility". CONCLUSION This study has resulted in a patient-oriented questionnaire that allows clinicians to gather patient input in a structured manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan K Saleh
- Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Canada
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Paula Folkeard
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Selina Liao
- Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Susan Scollie
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Canada
- Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rahme M, Folkeard P, Beaulac S, Scollie S, Parsa V. Modified Multiple Stimulus With Hidden Reference and Anchors-Gabrielsson Total Impression Sound Quality Rating Comparisons for Speech in Quiet, Noise, and Reverberation. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2023; 66:3677-3688. [PMID: 37579731 DOI: 10.1044/2023_jslhr-22-00627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to obtain, analyze, and compare subjective sound quality data for the same test stimuli using modified multistimulus MUSHRA (Multiple Stimulus with Hidden Reference and Anchors) based procedures (viz., MUSHRA with custom anchors and MUSHRA without anchor) and the single-stimulus Gabrielsson's total impression rating procedure. METHOD Twenty normally hearing young adults were recruited in this study. Participants completed sound quality ratings on two different hearing aid recording data sets-Data Set A contained speech recordings from four different hearing aids under a variety of noisy and processing conditions, and Data Set B contained speech recordings from a single hearing aid under a combination of different noisy, reverberant, and signal processing conditions. Recordings in both data sets were rated for their quality using the total impression rating procedure. In addition, quality ratings of Data Set A recordings were obtained using a MUSHRA with custom anchors, while the ratings of Data Set B recordings were collected using a MUSHRA without anchor. RESULTS Statistical analyses revealed a high test-retest reliability of quality ratings for the same stimuli that were rated multiple times. In addition, high-interrater reliability was observed with all three rating procedures. Further analyses indicated (a) a high correlation between the total impression rating and the two modified MUSHRA ratings and (b) a similar relationship between the average and standard deviation of the subjective rating data obtained by the total impression rating and MUSHRA with custom anchors on Data Set A, and the total impression rating and the MUSHRA without anchor on Data Set B. CONCLUSION Both sound quality procedures, namely, the MUSHRA-based procedures and the total impression rating scale, obtained similar quality ratings of varied hearing aid speech recordings with high reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Rahme
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paula Folkeard
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steve Beaulac
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Scollie
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- School of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vijay Parsa
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- School of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Johnson J, Sarangi L. Shared experiences among successful hearing aid users with high hearing aid self-efficacy. Int J Audiol 2023:1-8. [PMID: 37607212 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2243541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While targeted rehabilitation can enhance hearing aid self-efficacy (HASE), little research has been done to determine the factors contributing to its predictive value. By investigating the experiences of individuals who successfully use HAs and have high levels of HASE, we hoped to illuminate specific strategies and/or sources of support these individuals share that might explain why high HASE is often linked to successful outcomes. DESIGN AND STUDY SAMPLE This qualitative study explored the experiences of five older adults who were successful HA users and reported having high HASE. Semi-structured interview guides were developed using the transtheoretical model of behavioral change as a framework. Interviews were analyzed thematically and holistically. RESULTS Participants attributed their HA success to: intrinsic motivation to improve their hearing, confident self-reliance when making health decisions, willingness to act on advice from trusted others, pro-social personal attributes, positive expectations about HA outcomes, and actively pursuing an optimal HA outcome. CONCLUSIONS For these participants, internal factors related to emotional state and source of motivation, and, to a lesser extent, verbal persuasion played a crucial role in their long-term success. This suggests that external influencers might be less impactful in facilitating success for those with high HASE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jani Johnson
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Lipika Sarangi
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hohmann V. The future of hearing aid technology : Can technology turn us into superheroes? Z Gerontol Geriatr 2023:10.1007/s00391-023-02179-y. [PMID: 37103645 DOI: 10.1007/s00391-023-02179-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hearing aid technology has proven to be successful in the rehabilitation of hearing loss, but its performance is still limited in difficult everyday conditions characterized by noise and reverberation. OBJECTIVE Introduction to the current state of hearing aid technology and presentation of the current state of research and future developments. METHODS The current literature was analyzed and several specific new developments are presented. RESULTS Both objective and subjective data from empirical studies show the limitations of the current technology. Examples of current research show the potential of machine learning-based algorithms and multimodal signal processing for improving speech processing and perception, of using virtual reality for improving hearing device fitting and of mobile health technology for improving hearing health services. CONCLUSION Hearing device technology will remain a key factor in the rehabilitation of hearing impairments. New technology, such as machine learning and multimodal signal processing, virtual reality and mobile health technology, will improve speech enhancement, individual fitting and communication training, thus providing better support for all hearing-impaired patients, including older patients with disabilities or declining cognitive skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Hohmann
- Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, University of Oldenburg, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany.
- Hörzentrum Oldenburg gGmbH, Oldenburg, Germany.
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Oldenburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bannon L, Picou EM, Bailey A, Manchaiah V. Consumer Survey on Hearing Aid Benefit and Satisfaction. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2023; 66:1410-1427. [PMID: 36944181 DOI: 10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is unexplained variability in self-reported hearing aid outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate determinants of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction ratings using a large-scale customer survey and to analyze the relation between demographic variables, hearing aid attributes, benefit, and satisfaction. METHOD The study used a retrospective design wherein 2,109 hearing aid users, recruited by Hearing Tracker and Hearing Loss Association of America, completed an online survey. The survey included questions about demographics, perceived hearing loss, devices, service delivery, cost, benefit, and satisfaction. The analytic approach included descriptive summaries and regression models to evaluate potential determinants of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction ratings. RESULTS Hearing aid sound quality, fit and comfort, and battery life were related to both benefit and satisfaction. Respondents who rated these outcomes favorably were also likely to benefit from, and be satisfied with, their hearing aids. Benefit was also related to degree of hearing loss, hearing aid experience, and cost. Hearing aid users with greater self-perceived hearing loss, more hearing aid experience, and more expensive hearing aids reported more benefit. Satisfaction was also related to age, employment status, and brand. Younger respondents, those who were students, and those using certain brands reported more satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS The results highlight importance of good hearing aid outcomes (quality, fit/comfort, and battery life) for benefit and satisfaction ratings. Professionals who fit hearing aids should strive to focus on achieving these outcomes and researchers should strive to explain the remaining variability in ratings of benefit and satisfaction. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22280854.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Bannon
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
| | - Erin M Picou
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Vinaya Manchaiah
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora
- UCHealth Hearing and Balance Clinic, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora
- Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative Initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine and University of Pretoria, Aurora
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Speech and Hearing, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shetty HN, Kumar SD, Vijayasarathy S. Bluetooth Coupling in Hearing Aids: Effect on Audiovisual Speech Recognition and Quality Rating of Compressed Speech in Older Individuals with Sloping Hearing Loss. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 27:e302-e308. [PMID: 37125373 PMCID: PMC10147467 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Older individuals often report that they find it difficulty in enjoying watching television since they find it hard to follow the rapid intensity variations, and voice changes from scene to scene. Objective The present study investigated the effect of coupling the hearing aid with the television via Bluetooth on audiovisual speech recognition and quality rating of compressed speech in older individuals with hearing loss. Method Twenty participants in the age range of 60 to 75 years who had moderate to moderately severe sloping sensorineural hearing loss were bilaterally fitted with digital receiver in the canal hearing aids. The hearing aid was coupled with a television via Bluetooth using a streamer. The video recorded stimuli were presented at 65 dB SPL at normal rate, 35% compression and 45% compression conditions. Speech recognition scores and quality ratings were obtained for each condition with and without the Bluetooth streamer connected to the hearing aids. Results Speech recognition scores were significantly better with Bluetooth coupling compared with conventional hearing aid use at 40% compressed speech rate. The quality was also rated higher in almost all parameters across speech rates when Bluetooth was used. Conclusions The improved clarity and nullification of room reverberation offered by Bluetooth coupling can potentially compensate for the age-related temporal processing deficit contributing to ease of listening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shubhaganga Dhrruva Kumar
- Department of Speech and Hearing, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal
| | - Srikar Vijayasarathy
- Department of Audiology, JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
- Address for correspondence Srikar Vijayasarathy, MSc Department of Audiology, JSS Institute of Speech and HearingMysuru 570004, KarnatakaIndia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vercammen C, Oosthuizen I, Manchaiah V, Ratinaud P, Launer S, Swanepoel DW. Real-life and real-time hearing aid experiences: Insights from self-initiated ecological momentary assessments and natural language analysis. Front Digit Health 2023; 5:1104308. [PMID: 37006819 PMCID: PMC10050550 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1104308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionSmartphone technology can provide an effective means to bring real-life and (near-)real-time feedback from hearing aid wearers into the clinic. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) encourages listeners to report on their experiences during or shortly after they take place in order to minimize recall bias, e.g., guided by surveys in a mobile application. Allowing listeners to describe experiences in their own words, further, ensures that answers are independent of predefined jargon or of how survey questions are formulated. Through these means, one can obtain ecologically valid sets of data, for instance during a hearing aid trial, which can support clinicians to assess the needs of their clients, provide directions for fine-tuning, and counselling. At a larger scale, such datasets would facilitate training of machine learning algorithms that could help hearing technology to anticipate user needs.MethodsIn this retrospective, exploratory analysis of a clinical data set, we performed a cluster analysis on 8,793 open-text statements, which were collected through self-initiated EMAs, provided by 2,301 hearing aid wearers as part of their hearing care. Our aim was to explore how listeners describe their daily life experiences with hearing technology in (near-)real-time, in their own words, by identifying emerging themes in the reports. We also explored whether identified themes correlated with the nature of the experiences, i.e., self-reported satisfaction ratings indicating a positive or negative experience.ResultsResults showed that close to 60% of listeners' reports related to speech intelligibility in challenging situations and sound quality dimensions, and tended to be valued as positive experiences. In comparison, close to 40% of reports related to hearing aid management, and tended to be valued as negative experiences.DiscussionThis first report of open-text statements, collected through self-initiated EMAs as part of clinical practice, shows that, while EMA can come with a participant burden, at least a subsample of motivated hearing aid wearers could use these novel tools to provide feedback to inform more responsive, personalized, and family-centered hearing care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Vercammen
- Sonova AG, Research & Development, Stäfa, Switzerland
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Correspondence: Charlotte Vercammen
| | - Ilze Oosthuizen
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA, and University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Vinaya Manchaiah
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA, and University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
- UCHealth Hearing and Balance, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, United States
- School of Allied Health Sciences, Department of Speech and Hearing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Pierre Ratinaud
- Laboratoire D'Études et de Recherches Appliquées en Sciences Sociales (LERASS), University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Stefan Launer
- Sonova AG, Audiology & Health Innovation, Stäfa, Switzerland
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - De Wet Swanepoel
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA, and University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stone MA, Lough M, Kühnel V, Biggins AE, Whiston H, Dillon H. Perceived Sound Quality of Hearing Aids With Varying Placements of Microphone and Receiver. Am J Audiol 2023; 32:135-149. [PMID: 36580494 PMCID: PMC10166191 DOI: 10.1044/2022_aja-22-00061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Perceived sound quality was variously compared between either no aiding or aiding with three models of hearing aid that varied the microphone position around the pinna, depth of the receiver in the auditory meatus, degree of meatal occlusion, and processing sophistication. The hearing aids were modern designs and commercially available at the time of testing. METHOD Binaural recordings of multichannel spatially separated speech and music excerpts were made in a manikin, either open ear or aided. Recordings were presented offline over wide-bandwidth, high-quality insert earphones. Participants listened to pairs of the recordings and made preference ratings both by clarity and externality (a proxy for "spaciousness"). Two separate groups of adults were tested, 20 with audiometrically normal hearing (NH) and 20 with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss (hearing impaired [HI]). RESULTS For ratings of speech clarity, the NH group expressed no preference between the open ear and a deeply inserted occluding aid, both of which were preferred to a low-pass filtered output of the same aid. For the music signal, a small preference emerged for the open-ear recording over that of the aid. For the HI group, clarity of the deeply inserted aid was similar to in-the-ear and behind-the-ear devices for speech, but worse for music. Ratings of spaciousness produced no clear result in either group, which can be attributed to study limitations and/or participant factors. CONCLUSION Based on clarity, a wide bandwidth, particularly to beyond 5 kHz generally and below 300 Hz for music, is desirable, independent of hearing aid design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A. Stone
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom
- Hearing Device Research Centre, Hearing Health, National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom
| | - Melanie Lough
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom
- Hearing Device Research Centre, Hearing Health, National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Helen Whiston
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom
- Hearing Device Research Centre, Hearing Health, National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom
| | - Harvey Dillon
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom
- Hearing Device Research Centre, Hearing Health, National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom
- Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Benefits of Text Supplementation on Sentence Recognition and Subjective Ratings With and Without Facial Cues for Listeners With Normal Hearing. Ear Hear 2022:00003446-990000000-00088. [PMID: 36534697 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Recognizing speech through telecommunication can be challenging in unfavorable listening conditions. Text supplementation or provision of facial cues can facilitate speech recognition under some circumstances. However, our understanding of the combined benefit of text and facial cues in telecommunication is limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential benefit of text supplementation for sentence recognition scores and subjective ratings of spoken speech with and without facial cues available. DESIGN Twenty adult females (M = 24 years, range 21 to 29 years) with normal hearing performed a sentence recognition task and also completed a subjective rating questionnaire in 24 conditions. The conditions varied by integrity of the available facial cues (clear facial cues, slight distortion facial cues, great distortion facial cues, no facial cues), signal-to-noise ratio (quiet, +1 dB, -3 dB), and text availability (with text, without text). When present, the text was an 86 to 88% accurate transcription of the auditory signal presented at a 500 ms delay relative to the auditory signal. RESULTS The benefits of text supplementation were largest when facial cues were not available and when the signal-to-noise ratio was unfavorable. Although no recognition score benefit was present in quiet, recognition benefit was significant in all levels of background noise for all levels of facial cue integrity. Moreover, participant subjective ratings of text benefit were robust and present even in the absence of recognition benefit. Consistent with previous literature, facial cues were beneficial for sentence recognition scores in the most unfavorable signal-to-noise ratio, even when greatly distorted. It is interesting that, although all levels of facial cues were beneficial for recognition scores, participants rated a significant benefit only with clear facial cues. CONCLUSIONS The benefit of text for auditory-only and auditory-visual speech recognition is evident in recognition scores and subjective ratings; the benefit is larger and more robust for subjective ratings than for scores. Therefore, text supplementation might provide benefit that extends beyond speech recognition scores. Combined, these findings support the use of text supplementation in telecommunication, even when facial cues are concurrently present, such as during teleconferencing or watching television.
Collapse
|
17
|
Picou EM. Hearing Aid Benefit and Satisfaction Results from the MarkeTrak 2022 Survey: Importance of Features and Hearing Care Professionals. Semin Hear 2022; 43:301-316. [PMCID: PMC9715311 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The hearing aid market is rapidly evolving with advancements in features and potential changes in service delivery models, including the new over-the-counter device category. Data from the MarkeTrak 2022 survey indicate most hearing aid owners report regular quality-of-life benefits from hearing aids, even more than in previous surveys. The increased likelihood of hearing aid benefits might be attributable to modern hearing aid features advancements, such as wireless connectivity and rechargeable batteries. Hearing aid satisfaction rates have been relatively stable over the years, indicating that more than 80% of hearing aid owners are satisfied with their devices. Hearing aid satisfaction rates do not appreciably vary by fitting channel; hearing aid owners fitted in person, fitted remotely, or self-fit are similarly likely to report high satisfaction with their device. However, only respondents in the in-person channel gave establishment ratings (reflecting their willingness to recommend) that resulted and reflected a positive net promoter score. Given the potential for net promoter scores to be related to brand growth and customer loyalty, this finding has implications for the development of over-the-counter hearing aid service-delivery models. Additional work is warranted to explore the factors that negatively affect hearing aid owners' satisfaction with the companies delivering limited services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M. Picou
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee,Address for correspondence Erin M. Picou, Au.D., Ph.D. 1215 21st Avenue S, Room 8310, Nashville, TN 37232
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Oosthuizen I, Manchaiah V, Launer S, Swanepoel DW. Hearing aid Experiences of Adult Hearing aid Owners During and After Fitting: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Trends Hear 2022; 26:23312165221130584. [PMID: 36300258 PMCID: PMC9618746 DOI: 10.1177/23312165221130584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been an increasing number of qualitative studies exploring the experiences and perceptions of adult hearing aid owners throughout their hearing aid journey. As these studies and reported experiences vary greatly, a systematic review was conducted to identify and synthesize the key concepts in adult hearing aid owners' experiences during and after fitting. A systematic search of three electronic databases was conducted, yielding 443 results. Articles were evaluated for inclusion based on pre-determined eligibility criteria, including conventional, smartphone-connected, and direct-to-consumer hearing devices. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the included articles was evaluated using the Rating of Qualitative Research scale. Guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) were followed. A narrative synthesis was conducted, and studies were grouped into three main domains, namely experiences of owners related to a) hearing aid adoption and fitting (n = 3), b) hearing aid use (n = 20), and c) hearing aid sub-optimal use (n = 25). Hearing aid owners mainly reported on how their attitude towards hearing aids affected experiences during the fitting stage. Improved psychosocial functioning was the most prevalent perceived benefit of hearing aid use. Owners described sub-optimal use in terms of hearing device-related and non-device-related concepts. The COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation-behavior) model is used to discuss specific service-delivery, hearing-device, and hearing-aid-owner related concepts and clinical implications, including behavior change techniques to enhance understanding of the concepts that hearing aid owners perceive as essential to improve hearing aid experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilze Oosthuizen
- Department of Speech-language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA, and University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Ilze Oosthuizen, Department of Speech-language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
| | - Vinaya Manchaiah
- Department of Speech-language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA, and University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA,UCHealth Hearing and Balance, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA,Department of Speech and Hearing, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Stefan Launer
- Department of Audiology and Health Innovation, Sonova AG, Staefa, Switzerland,School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Australia
| | - De Wet Swanepoel
- Department of Speech-language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Virtual Hearing Lab, Collaborative initiative between University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA, and University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pasta A, Szatmari TI, Christensen JH, Jensen KJ, Pontoppidan NH, Sun K, Larsen JE. Investigating the Provision and Context of Use of Hearing Aid Listening Programs From Real-world Data: Observational Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e36671. [PMID: 36251349 DOI: 10.2196/36671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Listening programs enable hearing aid (HA) users to change device settings for specific listening situations and thereby personalize their listening experience. However, investigations into real-world use of such listening programs to support clinical decisions and evaluate the success of HA treatment are lacking. OBJECTIVE We aimed to investigate the provision of listening programs among a large group of in-market HA users and the context in which the programs are typically used. METHODS First, we analyzed how many and which programs were provided to 32,336 in-market HA users. Second, we explored 332,271 program selections from 1312 selected users to investigate the sound environments in which specific programs were used and whether such environments reflect the listening intent conveyed by the name of the used program. Our analysis was based on real-world longitudinal data logged by smartphone-connected HAs. RESULTS In our sample, 57.71% (18,663/32,336) of the HA users had programs for specific listening situations, which is a higher proportion than previously reported, most likely because of the inclusion criteria. On the basis of association rule mining, we identified a primary additional listening program, Speech in Noise, which is frequent among users and often provided when other additional programs are also provided. We also identified 2 secondary additional programs (Comfort and Music), which are frequent among users who get ≥3 programs and usually provided in combination with Speech in Noise. In addition, 2 programs (TV and Remote Mic) were related to the use of external accessories and not found to be associated with other programs. On average, users selected Speech in Noise, Comfort, and Music in louder, noisier, and less-modulated (all P<.01) environments compared with the environment in which they selected the default program, General. The difference from the sound environment in which they selected General was significantly larger in the minutes following program selection than in the minutes preceding it. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a deeper insight into the provision of listening programs on a large scale and demonstrates that additional listening programs are used as intended and according to the sound environment conveyed by the program name.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Pasta
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.,Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Cognitive Systems, Demant A/S, Smørum, Denmark
| | - Tiberiu-Ioan Szatmari
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.,Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Cognitive Systems, Demant A/S, Smørum, Denmark
| | | | - Kasper Juul Jensen
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Cognitive Systems, Demant A/S, Smørum, Denmark
| | | | - Kang Sun
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.,Eriksholm Research Centre, Oticon A/S, Snekkersten, Denmark
| | - Jakob Eg Larsen
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jorgensen L, Barrett R, Jedlicka D, Messersmith J, Pratt S. Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference: Physical and Perceptual Differences. Am J Audiol 2022; 31:1088-1097. [PMID: 36037483 DOI: 10.1044/2022_aja-21-00264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD) is a recommended measure for accurate hearing aid fittings, especially for pediatric populations. However, for adults, many clinicians question whether it is necessary. METHOD Hearing aids were fit on two groups of 85 older adults seen at a Veterans Administration audiology clinic. One group was fit using RECD measurements, whereas the second group was fit with population-based average RECD values. The two groups had similar pure-tone hearing thresholds. RESULTS Like previous studies, there was little difference between the measured RECD for the right and left ears among the participants. Although the majority of the measured RECDs were within 1 SD of the mean, approximately 20% of those measured were outside of the normal range. It also was found that all participants produced lower (improved) Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) scores from pre- to postfitting, thus suggesting a reduction in self-perceived hearing handicap. CONCLUSIONS Despite having similar prefitting HHIE-S scores, those participants who had their hearing aids fit using measured RECD values had lower postfitting scores than the group that was fit with average RECD values. Furthermore, there was a significant difference between the groups on several questions of the International Outcome Inventory-Hearing Aids, suggesting that there was higher satisfaction with the fittings based on the custom RECD rather than the fittings based on the average RECD. This study demonstrated that, in addition to performing verification using real-ear measurements, accurate conversion of dB HL to dB SPL using personalized RECD likely improved hearing aid satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Jorgensen
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Dakota, Vermillion.,VA Sioux Falls Healthcare System, SD.,VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, PA
| | - Rachel Barrett
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Dakota, Vermillion
| | - David Jedlicka
- VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, PA.,Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jessica Messersmith
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Dakota, Vermillion
| | - Sheila Pratt
- VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, PA.,Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Picou EM, Roberts RA, Angley G, Ricketts TA. Applying the Hearing Aid Fitting Standard to Selection for Adults. Semin Hear 2022; 43:66-78. [PMID: 35903077 PMCID: PMC9325089 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The recent hearing aid fitting standard for adults outlines the minimum practice for audiologists fitting adult patients with hearing loss. This article focuses on three items of the standard (5, 6, and 7), which focus on the selection of unilateral/bilateral hearing aids, hearing aid style, and coupling, in addition to feature selection. The standard emphasizes that decisions around these three aspects should be recommended for a patient in an individualized manner, based on their needs assessment. For these decisions, the needs assessment might include measures of speech-in-noise ability, social network size, patient preference, and a trial period. Additional elements could include assessments of manual dexterity, binaural interference, and attitude toward hearing aids. However, there are a multitude of ways to practice clinically and still meet the items outlined in the standard. As long as the selection decisions consider individualized patient factors and are capable of meeting validated prescriptive targets, a clinician would be meeting the adult hearing aid fitting minimum standard guidance. In addition, despite the large number of past studies supporting these standards, additional, high-quality research including randomized, controlled, clinical trials are still needed to further support appropriate minimum standard recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin M. Picou
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee,Address for correspondence Erin M. Picou, Au.D., Ph.D. 1215 21st Avenue South, Room 8310, Nashville, TN 37232
| | - Richard A. Roberts
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Gina Angley
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Todd A. Ricketts
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Atcherson SR. Assistive Technology for Adults with Hearing Aids. Semin Hear 2022; 43:79-84. [PMID: 35903072 PMCID: PMC9325080 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Although there is a strong trend of satisfaction with hearing aids, recent consumer surveys indicate that there are still challenges with understanding speech in background noise and low penetration of wireless technologies using many modern-day communication and audio devices, such as smartphones, tablets, and computers. For some listening and communication settings, many patients could benefit from assistive technology that exceeds the capabilities of their hearing aids. When patients are not wearing their hearing aids, such as during sleep, concerns about environmental awareness and safety begin to arise. This article describes some current assistive technologies and accessories that facilitate accessibility to other devices and to satisfy the patient's listening and communication needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel R Atcherson
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Carlson ML, Nassiri AM, Marinelli JP, Lohse CM, Sydlowski SA. Awareness, Perceptions, and Literacy Surrounding Hearing Loss and Hearing Rehabilitation Among the Adult Population in the United States. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e323-e330. [PMID: 35061637 PMCID: PMC8843398 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize current awareness, perceptions, and literacy surrounding hearing loss among the adult population in the United States. STUDY DESIGN National cross-sectional survey study. SETTING United States. PATIENTS Adults between 50 and 80 years of age in the United States. RESULTS Survey respondents included 1,250 adults between the ages of 50 and 80 years, including 500 who indicated at least moderate hearing loss and were using hearing aids and 750 who denied having hearing loss and were not using hearing aids.Only 9% of patients were able to correctly identify what constitutes a "normal" or "average" range for hearing. By comparison, a "normal" range of values for vision, blood pressure, and total cholesterol were identified correctly by 93%, 85%, and 52% of the 1,250 surveyed adults, respectively. When asked to rank the importance of addressing hearing loss within the context of 10 other common health conditions, hearing loss was ranked third to least important. When considering annual health maintenance, respondents indicated they were "very likely" to have an annual physical exam (72%), a cholesterol test (70%), an eye exam (66%), and bring their pet to a veterinarian (59%) over twice as frequently as having their hearing evaluated (27%).When evaluating awareness surrounding associations between hearing loss and other health and social issues, less than one-fourth indicated strong awareness about links between hearing loss and depression, employability and income, fall risk, dementia, and type 2 diabetes. While most patients acknowledge the potential impacts of hearing loss on safety, quality of life, and health, less than half believe that hearing loss is treatable and less than 20% believe that hearing loss is preventable. CONCLUSION Despite widespread literacy of what constitutes normal vision, blood pressure, and total cholesterol levels, respondents exhibit substantially poorer understanding of "normal" hearing levels. Most adults believe that few treatment options exist for the management of hearing loss. Underlying the uniformly limited literacy surrounding hearing loss and its treatment options is the adult population's lack of appreciation for the long-term health sequelae of untreated hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L. Carlson
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ashley M. Nassiri
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John P. Marinelli
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Christine M. Lohse
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Manchaiah V, Picou EM, Bailey A, Rodrigo H. Consumer Ratings of the Most Desirable Hearing Aid Attributes. J Am Acad Audiol 2021; 32:537-546. [PMID: 34965600 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modern hearing aids have various features and functionalities, such as digital wireless streaming, bilateral connectivity, rechargeability, and specialized programs, which allow for a multitude of hearing aid attributes (e.g., comfort, reliability, and clarity). Consumers likely vary greatly in their preferences for these hearing aid attributes. Their preferences might be related to various demographic and hearing loss characteristics. PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to describe which hearing aid attributes consumers find desirable when choosing their hearing aids and to explore factors that might predict preferences. RESEARCH DESIGN Cross-sectional. STUDY SAMPLE 14,993. INTERVENTION Not applicable. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS In this retrospective study, hearing aid attribute preferences were evaluated from consumers who answered questions in the Help Me Choose tool on the HearingTracker.com Web site. Chi-squared tests and correlation analyses were used to identify potential relationships between attribute preference and respondent characteristics. Cluster analysis with Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM) was used to identify patterns of attribute preferences. RESULTS Of the 21 hearing aid attributes queried, the four most favorably rated were improved ability to hear friends and family in quiet and in noisy settings, physical comfort, and reliability, with 75 to 88% of respondents rating these attributes as very or extremely important. Type of hearing loss, technology level preference, and mobile phone brand were significantly associated with preferences for all 21 hearing aid attributes. PAM cluster analysis unveiled two unique user groups based on their preference to hearing aid attributes. One-third of the respondents preferred high-end technology and favored all types of advanced attributes. The other two-thirds of users predominantly preferred either advanced or best match and were more selective about which attributes were most important to them. CONCLUSION Patterns in preferences to hearing aid attributes help identify unique subgroups of consumers. Patient preferences for specific hearing aid attributes, in addition to audiologic characteristics, could help audiologists in recommending hearing aids for their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinaya Manchaiah
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas.,Department of Speech and Hearing, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Erin M Picou
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Saleh HK, Folkeard P, Van Eeckhoutte M, Scollie S. Premium versus entry-level hearing aids: using group concept mapping to investigate the drivers of preference. Int J Audiol 2021; 61:1003-1017. [PMID: 34883040 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.2009923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the difference in outcome measures and drivers of user preference between premium and entry-level hearing aids using group concept mapping. DESIGN A single-blind crossover trial was conducted. Aided behavioural outcomes measured were loudness rating, speech/consonant recognition, and speech quality. Preference between hearing aids was measured with a 7-point Likert scale. Group concept mapping was utilised to investigate preference results. Participants generated statements based on what influenced their preferences. These were sorted into categories with underlying themes. Participants rated each statement on a 5-point Likert scale of importance. STUDY SAMPLE Twenty-three adult participants (mean: 62.4 years; range: 24-78) with mild to moderately severe bilateral SNHL (PTA500-4000 Hz > 20 dB HL). RESULTS A total of 83 unique statements and nine distinct clusters, with underlying themes driving preference, were generated. Clusters that differed significantly in importance between entry-level and premium hearing aid choosers were: Having access to smartphone application-based user-controlled settings, the ability to stream calls and music, and convenience features such as accessory compatibility. CONCLUSION This study has identified non-signal-processing factors which significantly influenced preference for a premium hearing aid over an entry-level hearing aid, indicating the importance of these features as drivers of user preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan K Saleh
- Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paula Folkeard
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maaike Van Eeckhoutte
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Hearing Systems, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens, Lyngby.,Ear, Nose, Throat (ENT) & Audiology Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Susan Scollie
- National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shohet J, Bibee J. New Considerations for a Totally Implantable Active Middle Ear Implant. Front Neurol 2021; 12:747887. [PMID: 34721275 PMCID: PMC8548455 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.747887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Totally implantable active middle ear implants (AMEI) provide full-time hearing amplification to those with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss. While technology in conventional hearing aids (CHA) has advanced greatly, limitations remain for people with active lifestyles, limited vision or dexterity, and hearing aid fit issues. Furthermore, direct-drive properties of AMEI are thought to provide those with inefficient middle ear transfer functions a distinct advantage in delivering prescribed sound to the cochlea, ultimately improving speech understanding with less distortion. AMEI safety, stability, and efficacy outcomes are well documented and fitting strategies continue to improve. Recent studies show how simple aided speech testing can help predict whether a patient struggling with CHA may instead benefit from an AMEI. Totally implantable AMEI continue to be a viable option for patients who cannot or will not utilize traditional hearing aids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Shohet
- Shohet Ear Associates, Orange County, CA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wang X, Zheng Y, Liu Y, Lu J, Cui Z, Li Z. Effects of demographic, audiologic, and hearing-aid-related variables on the outcomes of using hearing aids. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:3857-3865. [PMID: 34725721 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07126-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the influence of demographic, audiologic, and hearing-aid (HA)-related variables on HA outcomes. METHODS In total, 235 adults with hearing loss (HL) who used HAs for at least 3 months were included in the study, and completed audiologic tests and the Chinese version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Spearman correlation analysis and Wilcoxon test were conducted to identify factors related to IOI-HA overall and subscales scores. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was subsequently performed to determine the influence of factors on HA outcomes. RESULTS Age, daily use time, HA price, pure tone average (PTA) threshold, word recognition score (WRS), fitting (bilateral or unilateral), and HA style were associated with IOI-HA overall and subscales scores. However, only WRS, daily HA use time, HA price, and age entered the final regression model and were factors determining HA outcomes. CONCLUSIONS HA outcome is a multi-dimensional construct. In this study, WRS had the greatest influence on HA outcomes and seemed to be a primary predictor. Thus, HA owners with a higher WRS before HA fitting may indicate better satisfaction. Daily use time, HA price, and patient age also made significant contributions to HA outcomes and should be considered in clinical practice to facilitate auditory rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xunyi Wang
- Hearing Center/Hearing and Speech Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Lane, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yun Zheng
- Hearing Center/Hearing and Speech Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Lane, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
| | - Yiran Liu
- Statistics with Data Science, School of Mathematics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jingzhe Lu
- Hearing Center/Hearing and Speech Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Lane, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhiyuan Cui
- Hearing Center/Hearing and Speech Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Lane, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhen Li
- Hearing Center/Hearing and Speech Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Lane, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Davidson A, Marrone N, Wong B, Musiek F. Predicting Hearing Aid Satisfaction in Adults: A Systematic Review of Speech-in-noise Tests and Other Behavioral Measures. Ear Hear 2021; 42:1485-1498. [PMID: 33883425 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Adults with hearing loss report a wide range of hearing aid satisfaction that does not significantly correlate to degree of hearing loss. It is not clear which auditory behavioral factors do contribute to hearing aid satisfaction. While poor speech understanding in noise is known to contribute to dissatisfaction, there are many categories of this type of assessment. The purpose of this systematic review is to answer the question, "Are behavioral pre-fitting measures using speech and nonspeech materials related to hearing aid satisfaction among adults?" DESIGN Six electronic databases were searched to find peer-reviewed studies published before June 2020. The included studies reported on the relationship between auditory behavioral measures and hearing aid satisfaction alone or globally with other outcome domains among adults with hearing loss. Six types of behavioral prefitting measures were evaluated: speech recognition in quiet (% correct), speech recognition in noise (% correct), reception thresholds for speech-in-noise, speech-based subjective ratings, dichotic speech tests, and tests using nonspeech material. Each relevant study was independently reviewed by two reviewers. Methodological quality was evaluated in each included study using the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's level of evidence ratings. RESULTS There were 1342 articles identified in the systematic review process. After duplicates were removed and specific inclusion criteria were applied, 21 studies were included. All studies included had a 0 to 4 methodological quality rating indicating weak to moderate internal validity. The tests that showed potential for clinical application due to significant correlations with satisfaction were the QuickSIN, the synthetic sentence identification, the hearing in noise test, and the acceptable noise level test. Audibility, as measured by degree of hearing loss, was not significantly correlated to hearing aid satisfaction in the 13 studies that reported on this measure. CONCLUSIONS Based on this review, results indicated that speech-in-noise tests had the highest associations to hearing aid satisfaction, suggesting a greater role for assessment of speech-in-noise perception in auditory rehabilitation. This is an important finding for clinical practice, given that audibility was not a significant factor in predicting satisfaction. Overall, the results from this review show a need for well-designed, high-quality, prospective studies assessing the predictive value of prefitting measures on hearing aid satisfaction with current hearing aid models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa Davidson
- The University of Arizona Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Tucson, Arizona, USA.,Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Nicole Marrone
- The University of Arizona Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Bryan Wong
- The University of Arizona Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Frank Musiek
- The University of Arizona Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Branda E, Wurzbacher T. Motion Sensors in Automatic Steering of Hearing Aids. Semin Hear 2021; 42:237-247. [PMID: 34594087 PMCID: PMC8463121 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
A requirement for modern hearing aids is to evaluate a listening environment for the user and automatically apply appropriate gain and feature settings for optimal hearing in that listening environment. This has been predominantly achieved by the hearing aids' acoustic sensors, which measure acoustic characteristics such as the amplitude and modulation of the incoming sound sources. However, acoustic information alone is not always sufficient for providing a clear indication of the soundscape and user's listening needs. User activity such as being stationary or being in motion can drastically change these listening needs. Recently, hearing aids have begun utilizing integrated motion sensors to provide further information to the hearing aid's decision-making process when determining the listening environment. Specifically, accelerometer technology has proven to be an appropriate solution for motion sensor integration in hearing aids. Recent investigations have shown benefits with integrated motion sensors for both laboratory and real-world ecological momentary assessment measurements. The combination of acoustic and motion sensors provides the hearing aids with data to better optimize the hearing aid features in anticipation of the hearing aid user's listening needs.
Collapse
|
30
|
Korhonen P. Wind Noise Management in Hearing Aids. Semin Hear 2021; 42:248-259. [PMID: 34594088 PMCID: PMC8463128 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Many hearing aid users are negatively impacted by wind noise when spending time outdoors. Turbulent airflow around hearing aid microphones caused by the obstruction of wind can result in noise that is not only perceived as annoying but may also mask desirable sounds in the listening environment, such as speech. To mitigate the adverse effects of wind noise, hearing aid developers have introduced several technological solutions to reduce the amount of wind noise at the hearing aid output. Some solutions are based on mechanical modifications; more recently, sophisticated signal processing algorithms have also been introduced. By offering solutions to the wind noise problem, these signal processing algorithms can promote more optimal use of hearing aids during outdoor activities. This article reviews how wind noise is generated in hearing aids, outlines the technological challenges in wind noise management, and summarizes the technological solutions that have been proposed and/or implemented in modern hearing aids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petri Korhonen
- Office of Research in Clinical Amplification (ORCA-US), WS Audiology, Lisle, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Balling LW, Mølgaard LL, Townend O, Nielsen JBB. The Collaboration between Hearing Aid Users and Artificial Intelligence to Optimize Sound. Semin Hear 2021; 42:282-294. [PMID: 34594090 PMCID: PMC8463120 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Hearing aid gain and signal processing are based on assumptions about the average user in the average listening environment, but problems may arise when the individual hearing aid user differs from these assumptions in general or specific ways. This article describes how an artificial intelligence (AI) mechanism that operates continuously on input from the user may alleviate such problems by using a type of machine learning known as Bayesian optimization. The basic AI mechanism is described, and studies showing its effects both in the laboratory and in the field are summarized. A crucial fact about the use of this AI is that it generates large amounts of user data that serve as input for scientific understanding as well as for the development of hearing aids and hearing care. Analyses of users' listening environments based on these data show the distribution of activities and intentions in situations where hearing is challenging. Finally, this article demonstrates how further AI-based analyses of the data can drive development.
Collapse
|
32
|
Fabry DA, Bhowmik AK. Improving Speech Understanding and Monitoring Health with Hearing Aids Using Artificial Intelligence and Embedded Sensors. Semin Hear 2021; 42:295-308. [PMID: 34594091 PMCID: PMC8463124 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
This article details ways that machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies are being integrated in modern hearing aids to improve speech understanding in background noise and provide a gateway to overall health and wellness. Discussion focuses on how Starkey incorporates automatic and user-driven optimization of speech intelligibility with onboard hearing aid signal processing and machine learning algorithms, smartphone-based deep neural network processing, and wireless hearing aid accessories. The article will conclude with a review of health and wellness tracking capabilities that are enabled by embedded sensors and artificial intelligence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Fabry
- Starkey Hearing Technologies, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Hearing aids continue to acquire increasingly sophisticated sound-processing features beyond basic amplification. On the one hand, these have the potential to add user benefit and allow for personalization. On the other hand, if such features are to benefit according to their potential, they require clinicians to be acquainted with both the underlying technologies and the specific fitting handles made available by the individual hearing aid manufacturers. Ensuring benefit from hearing aids in typical daily listening environments requires that the hearing aids handle sounds that interfere with communication, generically referred to as “noise.” With this aim, considerable efforts from both academia and industry have led to increasingly advanced algorithms that handle noise, typically using the principles of directional processing and postfiltering. This article provides an overview of the techniques used for noise reduction in modern hearing aids. First, classical techniques are covered as they are used in modern hearing aids. The discussion then shifts to how deep learning, a subfield of artificial intelligence, provides a radically different way of solving the noise problem. Finally, the results of several experiments are used to showcase the benefits of recent algorithmic advances in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, speech intelligibility, selective attention, and listening effort.
Collapse
|
34
|
Alicea CCM, Doherty KA. Targeted Re-Instruction for Hearing Aid Use and Care Skills. Am J Audiol 2021; 30:590-601. [PMID: 34185574 DOI: 10.1044/2021_aja-20-00224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine if re-instructing a hearing aid (HA) user on the specific skill(s) they could not successfully perform on the Practical Hearing Aid Skills Test-Revised (PHAST-R) resulted in better HA use and care skills than a traditional fitting method. This is referred to as "targeted re-instruction." Also, factors that might affect HA use and care skills, including memory function, hearing handicap, and hearing aid-related attitudes, were assessed. Method This study was a randomized control trial. Twenty-six new HA users (13 experimental; 13 control) were fit with HAs and provided a standard HA orientation. HA use and care skills were measured immediately following the HA fitting and then again at 4 weeks post-HA fitting. The experimental group was administered the PHAST-R twice during the trial period to identify the HA use and care skills that participants needed re-instruction on. Results Participants in the experimental group maintained their HA use and care skills over the 4-week HA trial period, whereas participants in the control group showed a significant decline. Working memory, hearing handicap, and HA-related attitudes were not found to be correlated with HA use and care skills. Conclusions Participants who did not receive targeted re-instruction showed a decline in their HA use and care skills after only 4 weeks of HA use, whereas targeted re-instruction prevented a decline in HA use and care skills. It took an average of less than 10 min to administer the PHAST-R and provide targeted re-instruction, indicating that it would be appropriate to use in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly C. M. Alicea
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Syracuse University, New York
| | - Karen A. Doherty
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Syracuse University, New York
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Woodruff TA, DiFrancesco J, Kurth M, Marinelli A, Cienkowski KM. Disposable Hearing Aid Battery Management: Survey Assessment of Providers and Qualitative Interviews of Patients. Am J Audiol 2021; 30:730-744. [PMID: 34464535 DOI: 10.1044/2021_aja-20-00150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to better understand the behaviors that hearing aid users engage in to manage batteries. Method Two arms of research, a survey of audiologists (n = 110) and qualitative interviews with adult hearing aid users (n = 13), were conducted. Surveys were distributed and collected both via paper and online methods. Descriptive analyses of survey results were conducted to report on common threads. Qualitative interviews were conducted with video recording for transcription purposes. These transcripts were then coded thematically to identify shared themes across participants. Results Results of this study highlight the variability in behavior between provider-recommended strategies (preemptive battery management) and the reactive/delay strategies that are implemented by users. Patient reports indicate several challenges related to changing their batteries including limited information on hearing aid batteries, physical/sensory challenges to the act, and the social impact of having to change hearing aid batteries. Concurrently, patients express a wide range of strategies to address other challenges including engaging in cost-conscious behaviors when managing batteries (both purchasing and deciding to replace) and maintaining a collection of easily accessible batteries for use. Conclusions Hearing aid batteries are a topic that reflect social and economic factors in a patient's life. While providers may report they cover these topics sufficiently, challenges related to batteries may need specific elucidation by the clinician to ensure adherence to recommendations and functioning devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torri Ann Woodruff
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
| | - Jackie DiFrancesco
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
| | - Michael Kurth
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
| | - Alison Marinelli
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
- New England Center for Hearing Rehabilitation, Hampton, CT
| | - Kathleen M. Cienkowski
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Manchaiah V, Swanepoel DW, Bennett RJ. Online Consumer Reviews on Hearing Health Care Services: A Textual Analysis Approach to Examine Psychologically Meaningful Language Dimensions. Am J Audiol 2021; 30:669-675. [PMID: 34297608 DOI: 10.1044/2021_aja-20-00223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The study examined psychologically meaningful language dimensions (i.e., social and emotional dimensions, health dimensions, and personal concerns) within online consumer reviews on hearing health care services using an automated textual analysis approach. Method Nine thousand six hundred twenty-two consumer reviews of hearing health care services, including an open-ended question (i.e., free text response to the prompt "share details of your own experience at this place") and an overall rating (on a 5-point scale ranging from "very good" to "very poor") were extracted from Google.com from 40 different cities across the United States. In addition, some metadata about the cities (i.e., region, population size, median age, percentage of older adults) were also recorded. Text responses were analyzed using the automated Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software for selected language dimensions. The language dimensions of online hearing health care reviews were descriptively compared with language dimensions observed in the natural language of typical bloggers. Language dimensions from free text responses were correlated with quantitative overall experience ratings. Results Automated linguistic analysis showed that consumer reviews on hearing health care services had higher social processes, positive emotions, hearing, health, money, and work, and lower negative emotions and time-awareness when compared to typical bloggers. Examining the association between overall experience rating and the language dimensions revealed two broad findings. First, higher engagement of consumers in terms of social processes, positive emotions, hearing, and work dimensions was related to higher experience ratings. Second, higher engagement of consumers in terms of negative emotions, time awareness, and money was related to lower experience ratings. Conclusions Online reviews contain information about various dimensions (i.e., social and emotional dimensions as well as personal concerns) that have bearing toward the way in that they rate their health care experiences. Automated linguistic analysis of consumer reviews appears helpful in identifying gaps in service delivery that may influence consumer experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinaya Manchaiah
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX
- Department of Speech and Hearing, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, India
| | - De Wet Swanepoel
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia
- Ear Sciences Centre, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | - Rebecca J. Bennett
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia
- Ear Sciences Centre, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Manchaiah V, Swanepoel DW, Bailey A, Pennebaker JW, Bennett RJ. Hearing Aid Consumer Reviews: A Linguistic Analysis in Relation to Benefit and Satisfaction Ratings. Am J Audiol 2021; 30:761-768. [PMID: 34436933 DOI: 10.1044/2021_aja-21-00061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Online reviews have been used by hearing aid owners to share their experiences and to provide suggestions to potential hearing aid buyers, although they have not been systematically examined. The study was aimed at examining the hearing aid consumer reviews using automated linguistic analysis, and how the linguistic variables relate to self-reported hearing aid benefit and satisfaction ratings. Method The study used a cross-sectional design. One thousand three hundred seventy-eight consumer hearing aid reviews (i.e., text response to open-ended question), self-reported benefit and satisfaction ratings on hearing aids in a 5-point scale with meta-data (e.g., hearing aid brand, technology level) extracted from the Hearing Tracker website were analyzed using automated text analysis method known as the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Results Self-reported hearing aid benefit and satisfaction ratings were high (i.e., mean rating of 4.04 in a 5-point scale). Examining the association between overall rating and the key linguistic variables point to two broad findings. First, the more people were personally, socially, and emotionally engaged with the hearing device experience, the higher they rated their hearing device(s). Second, a minimal occurrence of clinic-visit language dimensions points to factors that likely affect benefit and satisfaction ratings. For example, if people mention paying too much money (money), their overall ratings are generally lower. Conversely, if people write about their health or home, the ratings were higher. There was no significant difference in linguistic analysis across different hearing aid brands and technology levels. Conclusions Hearing aid consumers are generally satisfied with their hearing device(s), and their online reviews contain information about social/emotional dimensions as well as clinic-visit related aspects that have bearing toward hearing aid benefit and satisfaction ratings. These results suggest that the natural language used by consumers provide insights on their perceived benefit/satisfaction from their hearing device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinaya Manchaiah
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX
- Department of Speech and Hearing, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University, India
| | - De Wet Swanepoel
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia
- Ear Sciences Centre, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | | | | | - Rebecca J. Bennett
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia
- Ear Sciences Centre, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jespersen CT, Kirkwood BC, Groth J. Increasing the Effectiveness of Hearing Aid Directional Microphones. Semin Hear 2021; 42:224-236. [PMID: 34594086 PMCID: PMC8463123 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Directionality is the only hearing aid technology - in addition to amplification - proven to help hearing aid users hear better in noise. Hearing aid directionality has been documented to improve speech intelligibility in multiple laboratory studies. In contrast, real-world studies have shown a disconnect between the potential of the technology and what hearing aid users experience in their daily life. This article describes the real-world studies that inspired ReSound to take a different approach to applying directional microphone technology. This approach is based on the idea that hearing aid directionality can leverage natural binaural hearing and inherent listening strategies. The directional strategy includes three listening modes that will be explained. These are the Spatial Cue Preservation mode, the Binaural Listening mode, and the Speech Intelligibility mode. The strategy and the advantages it provides in terms of sound quality, spatial hearing, and improved signal-to-noise ratio with maintained awareness of surroundings are explained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brent C. Kirkwood
- Department of Audiology Communications, GN Hearing A/S, Ballerup, Denmark
| | - Jennifer Groth
- Department of Audiology Communications, GN Hearing A/S, Ballerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Zhong L, Noud BP, Pruitt H, Marcrum SC, Picou EM. Effects of text supplementation on speech intelligibility for listeners with normal and impaired hearing: a systematic review with implications for telecommunication. Int J Audiol 2021; 61:1-11. [PMID: 34154488 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1937346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Telecommunication can be difficult in the presence of noise or hearing loss. The purpose of this study was to systematically review evidence regarding the effects of text supplementation (e.g. captions, subtitles) of auditory or auditory-visual signals on speech intelligibility for listeners with normal or impaired hearing. DESIGN Three databases were searched. Articles were evaluated for inclusion based on the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome framework. The Effective Public Health Practice Project instrument was used to evaluate the quality of the identified articles. STUDY SAMPLE After duplicates were removed, the titles and abstracts of 2019 articles were screened. Forty-six full texts were reviewed; ten met inclusion criteria. RESULTS The quality of all ten articles was moderate or strong. The articles demonstrated that text added to auditory (or auditory-visual) signals improved speech intelligibility and that the benefits were largest when auditory signal integrity was low, accuracy of the text was high, and the auditory signal and text were synchronous. Age and hearing loss did not affect benefits from the addition of text. CONCLUSIONS Although only based on ten studies, these data support the use of text as a supplement during telecommunication, such as while watching television or during telehealth appointments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Zhong
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Brianne P Noud
- Department of Audiology, Center for Hearing and Speech, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Harriet Pruitt
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Advanced Therapy Solutions, Clarksville, TN, USA
| | - Steven C Marcrum
- Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Erin M Picou
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ricketts TA, Picou EM. Symmetrical and asymmetrical directional benefits are present for talkers at the front and side. Int J Audiol 2021; 61:177-186. [PMID: 34106803 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1931488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical directional microphone settings on speech recognition, localisation and microphone preference in listening conditions with on- and off-axis talkers. DESIGN A within-subjects repeated-measure evaluation of three hearing aid microphone settings (bilateral omnidirectional, bilateral directional, asymmetrical directional) was completed in a moderately reverberant laboratory. An exploratory analysis of the potential relationship between microphone preference and unaided measures was also completed. STUDY SAMPLE Twenty adult listeners with mild to moderately severe bilateral hearing loss participated. RESULTS The directional and asymmetric microphone settings resulted in equivalent benefits for sentence recognition in noise, word recall, and localisation speed regardless of the speech loudspeaker location (on- or off-axis). However, localisation accuracy was significantly worse with the asymmetric fitting than the directional setting when speech was presented from the rear hemisphere. Listeners who always preferred directional microphones had significantly poorer unaided speech recognition than those who preferred the omnidirectional setting for one or more listening condition. CONCLUSIONS Benefits from directional and asymmetric processing were small in the current study, but generally similar to each other. Unaided speech recognition in noise performance may have utility as a clinical predictor of preference for directional processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd A Ricketts
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Erin M Picou
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chen J, Wang Z, Dong R, Fu X, Wang Y, Wang S. Effects of Wireless Remote Microphone on Speech Recognition in Noise for Hearing Aid Users in China. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:643205. [PMID: 33912004 PMCID: PMC8072043 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.643205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study was aimed at evaluating improvements in speech-in-noise recognition ability as measured by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with the use of wireless remote microphone technology. These microphones transmit digital signals via radio frequency directly to hearing aids and may be a valuable assistive listening device for the hearing-impaired population of Mandarin speakers in China. Methods: Twenty-three adults (aged 19-80 years old) and fourteen children (aged 8-17 years old) with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss were recruited. The Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test was used to test speech recognition ability in adult subjects, and the Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test for Children was used for children. The subjects' perceived SNR was measured using sentence recognition ability at three different listening distances of 1.5, 3, and 6 m. At each distance, SNR was obtained under three device settings: hearing aid microphone alone, wireless remote microphone alone, and hearing aid microphone and wireless remote microphone simultaneously. Results: At each test distance, for both adult and pediatric groups, speech-in-noise recognition thresholds were significantly lower with the use of the wireless remote microphone in comparison with the hearing aid microphones alone (P < 0.05), indicating better SNR performance with the wireless remote microphone. Moreover, when the wireless remote microphone was used, test distance had no effect on speech-in-noise recognition for either adults or children. Conclusion: Wireless remote microphone technology can significantly improve speech recognition performance in challenging listening environments for Mandarin speaking hearing aid users in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Shuo Wang
- Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Versfeld NJ, Lie S, Kramer SE, Zekveld AA. Informational masking with speech-on-speech intelligibility: Pupil response and time-course of learning. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2021; 149:2353. [PMID: 33940918 DOI: 10.1121/10.0003952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Previous research has shown a learning effect on speech perception in nonstationary maskers. The present study addressed the time-course of this learning effect and the role of informational masking. To that end, speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured for speech in either a stationary noise masker, an interrupted noise masker, or a single-talker masker. The utterance of the single talker was either time-forward (intelligible) or time-reversed (unintelligible), and the sample of the utterance was either frozen (same utterance at each presentation) or random (different utterance at each presentation but from the same speaker). Simultaneously, the pupil dilation response was measured to assess differences in the listening effort between conditions and to track changes in the listening effort over time within each condition. The results showed a learning effect for all conditions but the stationary noise condition-that is, improvement in SRT over time while maintaining equal pupil responses. There were no significant differences in pupil responses between conditions despite large differences in the SRT. Time reversal of the frozen speech affected neither the SRT nor pupil responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niek J Versfeld
- Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sisi Lie
- Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sophia E Kramer
- Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriana A Zekveld
- Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Yellamsetty A, Ozmeral EJ, Budinsky RA, Eddins DA. A Comparison of Environment Classification Among Premium Hearing Instruments. Trends Hear 2021; 25:2331216520980968. [PMID: 33749410 PMCID: PMC7989119 DOI: 10.1177/2331216520980968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Hearing aids classify acoustic environments into multiple, generic classes for the purposes of guiding signal processing. Information about environmental classification is made available to the clinician for fitting, counseling, and troubleshooting purposes. The goal of this study was to better inform scientists and clinicians about the nature of that information by comparing the classification schemes among five premium hearing instruments in a wide range of acoustic scenes including those that vary in signal-to-noise ratio and overall level (dB SPL). Twenty-eight acoustic scenes representing various prototypical environments were presented to five premium devices mounted on an acoustic manikin. Classification measures were recorded from the brand-specific fitting software then recategorized to generic labels to conceal the device company, including (a) Speech in Quiet, (b) Speech in Noise, (c) Noise, and (d) Music. Twelve normal-hearing listeners also classified each scene. The results revealed a variety of similarities and differences among the five devices and the human subjects. Where some devices were highly dependent on input overall level, others were influenced markedly by signal-to-noise ratio. Differences between human and hearing aid classification were evident for several speech and music scenes. Environmental classification is the heart of the signal processing strategy for any given device, providing key input to subsequent decision-making. Comprehensive assessment of environmental classification is essential when considering the cost of signal processing errors, the potential impact for typical wearers, and the information that is available for use by clinicians. The magnitude of differences among devices is remarkable and to be noted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anusha Yellamsetty
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Erol J. Ozmeral
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Robert A. Budinsky
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - David A. Eddins
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ultrarare heterozygous pathogenic variants of genes causing dominant forms of early-onset deafness underlie severe presbycusis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:31278-31289. [PMID: 33229591 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2010782117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Presbycusis, or age-related hearing loss (ARHL), is a major public health issue. About half the phenotypic variance has been attributed to genetic factors. Here, we assessed the contribution to presbycusis of ultrarare pathogenic variants, considered indicative of Mendelian forms. We focused on severe presbycusis without environmental or comorbidity risk factors and studied multiplex family age-related hearing loss (mARHL) and simplex/sporadic age-related hearing loss (sARHL) cases and controls with normal hearing by whole-exome sequencing. Ultrarare variants (allele frequency [AF] < 0.0001) of 35 genes responsible for autosomal dominant early-onset forms of deafness, predicted to be pathogenic, were detected in 25.7% of mARHL and 22.7% of sARHL cases vs. 7.5% of controls (P = 0.001); half were previously unknown (AF < 0.000002). MYO6, MYO7A, PTPRQ, and TECTA variants were present in 8.9% of ARHL cases but less than 1% of controls. Evidence for a causal role of variants in presbycusis was provided by pathogenicity prediction programs, documented haploinsufficiency, three-dimensional structure/function analyses, cell biology experiments, and reported early effects. We also established Tmc1 N321I/+ mice, carrying the TMC1:p.(Asn327Ile) variant detected in an mARHL case, as a mouse model for a monogenic form of presbycusis. Deafness gene variants can thus result in a continuum of auditory phenotypes. Our findings demonstrate that the genetics of presbycusis is shaped by not only well-studied polygenic risk factors of small effect size revealed by common variants but also, ultrarare variants likely resulting in monogenic forms, thereby paving the way for treatment with emerging inner ear gene therapy.
Collapse
|
45
|
Liu H, Liu S, Shkel AA, Kim ES. Active Noise Cancellation with MEMS Resonant Microphone Array. JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS : A JOINT IEEE AND ASME PUBLICATION ON MICROSTRUCTURES, MICROACTUATORS, MICROSENSORS, AND MICROSYSTEMS 2020; 29:839-845. [PMID: 33746474 PMCID: PMC7978172 DOI: 10.1109/jmems.2020.3011938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
This paper presents active noise cancelation (ANC) based on MEMS resonant microphone array (RMA) which offers very high sensitivities (and thus very low noise floors) near resonance frequencies and also provides filtering in acoustic domain. The ANC is targeted to actively cancel out any sound between 5 - 9 kHz (above the speech range of 300 - 3,400 Hz). The ANC works best around the resonance frequencies of the resonant microphones where the sensitivities are high. The ANC has been implemented with analog inverter, digital phase compensator, digital adaptive filter, and deep learning, and shown to perform better with a digital adaptive filter for both RMA-based and flat-band-microphone-based ANC. At the same time, when the sound intensity over 5 - 9 kHz is low, RMA-based ANC with adaptive filter works the best among different approaches tested. Automatic speech recognition under different noises (of different intensity levels) has been tested with ANC. In all the tested cases, word error rate improves with ANC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai Liu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
| | - Song Liu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
| | - Anton A Shkel
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA. He is now with Facebook, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
| | - Eun Sok Kim
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
| |
Collapse
|