Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation Index for the Assessment of Procedural Pain in Nonanesthetized Infants: A Multicenter Pilot Study

The Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation Index for Assessment of Procedural Pain and Discomfort in Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Intensive Care Patients: A Prospective, Exploratory, Observational Study

BACKGROUND

The heart rate variability-based Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) Index is a continuous noninvasive tool for the assessment of pain and discomfort in infants. Little is known about its performance in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) setting, where assessment of pain/discomfort is usually based on discontinuous observational scoring systems or personal experience of medical staff.

AIM

Evaluation of the performance of NIPE as an indicator of procedural pain and/or discomfort in conscious mechanically ventilated PICU patients.

METHODS

Procedural pain/discomfort was simultaneously assessed during pain- or stressful procedures by two validated discontinuous clinical scoring systems (FLACC and COMFORT-B scale) and the NIPE.

RESULTS

NIPE values, FLACC- and COMFORT-B scores were recorded in 17 infants with a mean age of 1.2 (range 0.8-5.9) months. NIPE values associated with positive FLACC- (≥ 4; indicative of pain) and/or COMFORT-B (≥ 17, indicative of discomfort) scores were lower (p < 0.001) than when associated with negative FLACC (< 4) and/or COMFORT-B (< 17) scores with 95% CI's of a difference of -14 to -11 (FLACC), -13 to -11 (COMFORT-B) and -14 to -11 (FLACC and COMFORT-B), with significant interindividual variability in NIPE values. Logistic regression analyses revealed odds ratios between 0.84 and 0.85; the adjacent receiver operating curve analyses showed areas under the curve between 0.83 and 0.88. NIPE data recording failure occurred during 49.3% of the periods with a FLACC ≥ 4% and 40.7% with a COMFORT-B ≥ 17.

CONCLUSIONS

The NIPE detects procedural pain and discomfort in conscious mechanically ventilated infants with an accuracy comparable to established clinical scoring systems. However, because of significant interindividual variability of NIPE values and frequent data recording failure associated with patient movement, we believe it is premature to recommend its use in conscious infants.

Does heart rate variability using the Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation index identify postsurgical pain levels and emergence delirium in toddlers? A prospective observational study

PURPOSE

Children recovering from anesthesia commonly experience early postoperative negative behaviour, caused by pain and emergence delirium. Differentiating the two is challenging in young children. Perioperative pain influences the heart rate variability-derived Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) index and may also affect emergence delirium. We sought to investigate whether the perioperative NIPE index can discriminate between mild, moderate, or severe pain levels and can detect emergence delirium.

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled children aged three years or younger undergoing elective adenotonsillectomy, tonsillectomy, or adenoidectomy. The NIPE index, the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) score, and the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score were recorded in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). The primary aim was to investigate the relationship between the postoperative NIPE index and postoperative pain severity. The secondary aims were to evaluate the association between the NIPE index and emergence delirium (PAED ≥ 10) and its delirium-specific (ED-I) and pain-specific (ED-II) components.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine children were recruited. In the PACU, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) NIPE values in children experiencing moderate and severe pain were 50 (12) and 49 (14), respectively. These values were significantly lower than the mean (SD) value of 64 (13) observed in children with mild pain (mean difference moderate vs no/mild pain, -14; 95% confidence interval [CI], -17 to -11; P < 0.001, and mean difference severe vs no/mild pain, -17; 95% CI, -20 to -14; P < 0.001, respectively). The NIPE index was significantly lower in children experiencing pain-specific ED-II (mean [SD] NIPE instantaneous [NIPEi] for ED-II 49 [10] vs no ED-II 55 [13]; mean difference, -6; 95% CI, -11 to -2; P = 0.009). The NIPE index was unable to detect emergence delirium (mean [SD] NIPEi for ED, 54 [15] vs no ED, 51 [10]; mean difference, 3; 95% CI, -2 to 8; P = 0.23) or the delirium-specific component ED-I (mean [SD] NIPEi for ED-I, 55 [15] vs no ED-I, 51 [11]; mean difference, 4; 95% CI, 0 to 8; P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

The NIPE index can identify moderate and severe postoperative pain after adenotonsillectomy but not emergence delirium in children aged three years and younger. This discrimination can be valuable in the early postoperative phase when the differentiation between pain and emergence delirium is difficult.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04909060 ); first submitted 26 May 2021.

Sensitivity and Specificity of the Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation Index in Pain Assessment of Very Low Birth Weight Infants

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the results of a study investigating the sensitivity and specificity of the Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) index for detecting the physiological changes resulting from nociception in painful procedures in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational study was carried on of 44 newborns at 23 to 32 weeks' gestational age. The sensitivity and specificity of the NIPE index are analyzed using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Most of the painful procedures performed were skin-lancing and venipunctures. Nonpainful procedures consist of no intervention, with an interval of at least 1 hour with painful procedures in each newborn.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the NIPE index to diagnose mild nociceptive stimulation in VLBW newborns is 73.2%.

CONCLUSION

The NIPE index is a useful technique for assessing nociceptive stimulation in newborns, presenting less observer-dependent variability than other pain assessment scales.

KEY POINTS

· The NIPE index offers an objective assessment of pain.. · Moderate-high sensitivity of the NIPE index in the evaluation of pain in premature newborns.. · Painful procedures in VLBW newborns are reflected as a decrease in the NIPE score..

Newborn and Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE™) Monitor for Assessing Pain During Surgery and Interventional Procedures: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The heart rate variability-derived Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) monitor has been designed to be an objective, non-invasive tool for the assessment of pain and discomfort in children under 2 years of age. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the ability of NIPE to assess pain in neonates and infants during surgical and/or painful procedures.

METHODS

A systematic review (2010-2023) was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Studies containing children above 2-years-old were excluded. The ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions) tool was used to assess the quality of included studies.

RESULTS

9 databases were searched identifying 470 articles, 460 did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded; therefore, 10 studies with 548 participants were included. NIPE was used to assess intraoperative and postoperative pain for surgery under general anaesthesia (5 studies), as well as acute and prolonged pain from other interventional procedures (5 studies). For surgery under general anaesthesia: NIPE has shown to detect nociceptive events (e.g., skin incision, intubation), insufficient analgesia intraoperatively and to predict early postoperative pain. For painful interventional procedures: NIPE has shown to detect acute pain with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value.

CONCLUSION

NIPE has been used to assess pain in surgery and for various painful procedures. NIPE can detect intraoperative pain and reflect early postoperative pain. NIPE may be useful in evaluating procedural pain, however with heterogenous outcomes, more studies are required to confirm its efficacy.

TYPE OF STUDY

Systematic Review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Biomarkers for assessing pain and pain relief in the neonatal intensive care unit

Newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) regularly undergo painful procedures and may face various painful conditions such as postoperative pain. Optimal management of pain in these vulnerable preterm and term born neonates is crucial to ensure their comfort and prevent negative consequences of neonatal pain. This entails accurate and timely identification of pain, non-pharmacological pain treatment and if needed administration of analgesic therapy, evaluation of treatment effectiveness, and monitoring of adverse effects. Despite the widely recognized importance of pain management, pain assessment in neonates has thus far proven to be a challenge. As self-report, the gold standard for pain assessment, is not possible in neonates, other methods are needed. Several observational pain scales have been developed, but these often rely on snapshot and largely subjective observations and may fail to capture pain in certain conditions. Incorporation of biomarkers alongside observational pain scores holds promise in enhancing pain assessment and, by extension, optimizing pain treatment and neonatal outcomes. This review explores the possibilities of integrating biomarkers in pain assessment in the NICU.

The Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE™) monitor predicts post-operative pain in children undergoing day-procedures: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Pain assessment is essential for the administration of appropriate analgesia. Currently, clinicians use surrogate methods, such as heart rate or behavioural pain scales, to estimate pain in neonates and infants. The Newborn and Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE™) monitor aims to provide an objective numeric value (NIPE index) of pain through a continuous assessment of the patient's parasympathetic activity. The aim of this study was to determine if the intraoperative NIPE index monitoring could predict postoperative pain in neonates and infants.

METHODS

This prospective observational pilot study included neonates and infants undergoing elective day-surgical procedures (n = 50). Intraoperatively, NIPE indices at 0 (NIPE0), 10 (NIPE10), 20 (NIPE20), 30 (NIPE30) minutes and at completion of surgery (NIPEe), were recorded; the median NIPE index (NIPEm) was calculated for the entire procedure. Postoperative Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale scores were calculated by the nursing staff blinded to the intraoperative NIPE indices.

RESULTS

Linear regression documented an association between the NIPEm and postoperative FLACC score at 0 (r = 0.31, p = 0.03) and 10 min (r = 0.36, p = 0.01). No significant associations were observed for FLACC scores at 20 (r = 0.21, p = 0.2) and 30 min (r = 0.36, p > 0.9). Multiple regression analysis revealed that intraoperative NIPE10, NIPE20, NIPE30 and NIPEe also predicted the FLACC score at 0 min (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The intraoperative NIPE index is predictive of pain in the immediate postoperative period. This association was lost at 20 min likely due to nursing intervention to administer analgesia. NIPE monitoring could be useful in facilitating postoperative pain management in infants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

TYPE OF STUDY

Study of Diagnostic Test.

Monitoring of analgesia level during general anesthesia in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Monitoring of intraoperative nociception has made substantial progress in adult anesthesia during the last 10 years. Several monitors have been validated and their use has been associated with intraoperative or postoperative benefits in the adult population. In pediatric anesthesia, less data are available. However, several recent publications have assessed the performance of nociception monitors in children, and investigated their potential benefits in this context. This review will describe the main validated intraoperative nociception monitors, summarize adult findings and describe the available pediatric data.

RECENT FINDINGS

Six intraoperative nociception indices were included in this review. Among them, four have shown promising results in children: Surgical Pleth Index (GE-Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland), Analgesia-Nociception Index (Mdoloris Medical Systems, Loos, France), Newborn-Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (Mdoloris Medical Systems), and Pupillometry (IDMED, Marseille, France). The relevance of Skin Conductance (MedStorm innovations, AS, Oslo, Norway) under general anesthesia could not be established. Finally, the Nociception Level (Medasense, Ramat Gan, Israel) still requires to be investigated in children.

SUMMARY

To date, four monitors may provide a relevant assessment of intraoperative nociception in children. However, the potential clinical benefits associated with their use to guide analgesia remain to be demonstrated.

Usefulness of two types of pain monitors in newborns treated in NICU, in the opinion of experts: Results of the survey

Pain experienced in the neonatal period has been shown to have serious short- and long-term consequences. It is also known that painkillers have side effects and should not be abused. The basis of proper pain management is assessment of pain, which in newborns is very difficult due to the lack of verbal communication. In these patients, behavioural scales are used to assess pain, but they have numerous shortcomings. For this reason, many newborns treated in the ICU are at risk of pain, so instrumental methods of detecting and assessing the severity of pain are being sought. During three months, seven Polish NICUs conducted research with the use of NIPE and SCA monitors. After this time, the heads of these departments filled in questionnaires regarding their individual opinions on the usefulness of these devices. All respondents found pain monitors useful in the NICU. The NIPE monitor was rated slightly higher, as its usefulness in assessing the effectiveness of analgosedation and in the management of patients in the postoperative period was better rated. The high acceptance of both devices by legal guardians of newborns is noteworthy. It should be stated that in newborns, any way to improve pain monitoring is valuable. In the opinion of Polish experts, pain monitors are useful in NICU. The NIPE monitor was assessed a little higher and was considered useful in the assessment of analgosedation and in postoperative treatment. Pain monitors can provide valuable support for pain assessment in newborns treated in the NICU.

Available Instruments to Assess Pain in Infants

Pain assessment in newborns and infants is challenging for clinicians. Although behavioral and behavioral-physiological scales are validated pain assessment instruments, their use in this age group has significant limitations. In this review, we summarize the methods currently available for assessing pain in neonates and infants. It is possible that these pain detection methods are also useful for assessing the quality of anesthesia and analgosedation in these populations. Further research should be aimed at confirming the usefulness of these tools in infants and identifying additional pain assessment options for clinical practice.

The performance of the heart rate variability-derived Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation Index as a measure of early postoperative pain and discomfort in infants-A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The heart rate variability-derived Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE™) Index is a continuous noninvasive tool for the assessment of pain and discomfort in infants. Little is known about its performance in the early postoperative setting, where assessment of pain/discomfort is usually based on discontinuous observational scoring systems or personal experience of medical staff.

AIMS

To investigate the performance of the NIPE as a measure of early postoperative pain and/or discomfort in infants.

METHODS

The potential of the NIPE to detect pain/discomfort, as assessed by two clinical scoring systems (FLACC and COMFORT-B scale), was investigated in postoperative infants (0-2 years).

RESULTS

Receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses investigating the power of the NIPE to distinguish between comfort and pain/discomfort, revealed areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 for the FLACC, 0.81 for the COMFORT-B score, and 0.77 for a combination of FLACC & COMFORT-B. Logistic regression analysis provided initial evidence that the NIPE is an independent predictor of a FLACC score ≥4 and/or a COMFORT-B score ≥17, though R² values were below .2. NIPE values associated with a FLACC ≥4 (48 [45-56]), a COMFORT-B score ≥17 (47 [42-53]), and a FLACC ≥4 & COMFORT-B ≥17 (47 [42-57]) were lower than NIPE values associated with a FLACC <4 (60 [53-68], 95% CI of difference -14 to -8, p < .0001), a COMFORT-B score <17 (61 [54-68], 95% CI of difference -16 to -10, p < .0001), and a FLACC <4 & COMFORT-B score <17 (60 [53-68], 95% CI of difference -15 to -8, p < .0001). We found no evidence of a predictive value of the NIPE regarding the occurrence of pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The NIPE detected pain and discomfort in infants after general anesthesia with reasonable areas under the ROC curve (±0.8), whereas it was not predictive of clinically detectable pain or discomfort.

The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation index for acute procedural pain assessment in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessments of pain in hospitalized preterm infants present a major challenge in improving the short- and long-term consequences associated with painful experiences. We evaluated the ability of the newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation (NIPE) index to detect acute procedural pain in preterm infants.

METHODS

Different painful and stressful interventions were prospectively observed in preterm infants born at 25 + 0 to 35 + 6 weeks gestation. Pain responses were measured using the composite Premature Infant Pain Profile Revised (PIPP-R) scale, the NIPE index, and skin conductance responses (SCR). Outcome measures were correlations between the NIPE index, the PIPP-R score, and the SCR. Sensitivity/specificity analyses tested the accuracy of the NIPE index and SCR.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-four procedures were recorded in 90 preterm infants. No significant correlation was found between PIPP-R and the NIPE index. PIPP-R and SCR were positively correlated (r = 0.27, P < 0.001), with stronger correlations for painful procedures (r = 0.68, P < 0.001) and especially for skin-breaking procedures (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). The NIPE index and SCR had high sensitivity and high negative predictive values to predict PIPP-R > 10, especially for skin-breaking painful procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant correlation between the NIPE index and PIPP-R during routine painful or stressful procedures in preterm infants.

IMPACT

Exposure to repetitive pain can lead to neurodevelopmental sequelae. Behavior-based pain scales have limited clinical utility, especially for preterm infants. New devices for monitoring physiological responses to pain have not been validated sufficiently in preterm infants. This study found that the NIPE index was not significantly correlated to the validated PIPP-R scale during acute procedural pain. Secondary analysis of this study showed that NIPE index and SCRs may help to exclude severe pain in preterm infants. In clinical practice, measurements of physiological parameters should be combined with behavior-based scales for multidimensional pain assessments.

The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation in pediatric and neonatology: a literature review

PURPOSE

The Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) is a heart rate variability-based technology for assessing pain and comfort in neonates and infants under 2-years-old. This review aims to investigate the clinical utility of the NIPE.

METHODS

Two investigators screened Pubmed/Medline and Google Scholar for relevant studies, independently. One investigator extracted data, which were reviewed by a second investigator.

RESULTS

The NIPE was used during/after painful stimuli (6 studies), in the context of general anaesthesia (2 studies), and for comfort assessment (6 studies). A) Evaluation of procedural pain/distress: 2 studies reported that the mean-NIPE could be used for reliable monitoring of prolonged pain, and one study reported the association between instant-NIPE and pain after a stimulus but the instant-NIPE represents the NIPE average over 3 min. Two studies found no correlation between the NIPE and comfort behavior/pain scales, but they mainly differed in patients' gestational age and evaluation methodology. B) There are only 2 studies for the evaluation of nociception during surgery under general anaesthesia with contradictory results. C) Studies assessing neonates' comfort reported increased NIPE scores during skin-to-skin contact and during facilitated tucking associated with a human voice. No effect on NIPE scores of facilitated tucking during echocardiography was reported in preterm infants. One study reported significantly different NIPE scores with 2 surfactant therapy protocols. Overall, study populations were small and heterogeneous.

CONCLUSION

The results regarding NIPE's performances differ between studies. Given the limited number of studies and the heterogeneous outcomes, more studies are required to confirm the NIPE usefulness in the different clinical settings.

Newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation for the assessment of analgosedation adequacy in infants treated by mechanical ventilation - a multicenter pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Adequate analgosedation is important in infants treated in pediatric/neonatal intensive care units (P/NICUs), because both too deep and insufficient analgosedation is disadvantageous. To assess the severity of pain, several behavioral and behavioral-physiological scales are used, but their usefulness is limited. It is therefore justified to search for additional methods to assess the adequacy of analgosedation in these patients. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the usefulness of Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) in the assessment of analgosedation quality in infants requiring mechanical ventilation, who are treated in P/NICUs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed simultaneously 180 COMFORT-B assessments and heart rate variability measurements using a NIPE monitor in 30 mechanically ventilated infants receiving analgosedation. A generalized linear mixed model with the logit link function was used in order to perform logistic regression analysis to assess the relationship between NIPEi/NIPEm and deep sedation.

RESULTS

The multivariable logistic regression model showed that NIPEi and NIPEm values were higher when analgosedation was deep as compared to when it was moderate or insufficient (OR (95% CI): NIPEm - 1.065 (1.007-1.126), p = 0.03; NIPEi - 1.068 (1.016-1.123), p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The NIPE indexes are significantly higher in patients whose assessment on the behavioral scale indicates deep analgosedation as compared to those in whom it indicates moderate or insufficient analgosedation. Allowing continuous monitoring, the NIPE device may be a valuable assisting tool in the assessment of analgosedation quality in mechanically ventilated newborns and infants.

Procedural Pain Assessment in Infants Without Analgosedation: Comparison of Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation and Skin Conductance Activity - A Pilot Study

Objective: New technologies to measure pain responses, such as heart rate variability and skin conductance hold promise in the development of tools that can be reliable and quantifiable of detecting pain. The main objective of this study was to assess the capability of two monitors i.e., Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) and Skin Conductance Algesimeter for detecting procedural pain in non-anesthetized infants. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three non-anesthetized infants were enrolled to the study. To detect pain caused by heel stick, NIPE, and Skin Conductance monitors and behavioral pain scales were used. Three minutes before and just after heel stick, pain was evaluated by behavioral scales, and simultaneously over the whole period by NIPE and SCA. Results: A statistically significant decrease of NIPE Index and an increase of SCA values were found after the HS procedure. There were no statistically significant differences between the decrease in NIPEi values and the increase in PPS values between subgroups based on pain assessment by behavioral-scale scores. Conclusion: Both NIPE and SCA can be useful for detection of procedural pain and may constitue an additional valuable tool for better handling of pain among patients treated in NICUs. More studies on larger groups of patients are needed.