Osteoradionecrosis of the Midface and Mandible: Pathogenesis and Management

Free fibula mandible reconstruction for osteoradionecrosis is more challenging than for primary cancer

INTRODUCTION

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the mandible is an unfortunate potential sequela of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. In advanced cases of ORN, mandibulectomy, and free fibula flap reconstruction are required. We hypothesized that patients undergoing fibula free flap reconstruction and mandibulectomy for ORN pose unique challenges and experience more complications than patients undergoing fibula free flaps after oncologic mandibulectomy.

METHODS

After IRB approval, we created a database of all free fibula flaps for mandible reconstruction from April 2005 through February 2019. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patient and surgical characteristics and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Four-hundred seventy-nine patients met the inclusion criteria (168 ORN vs. 311 non-ORN patients). Propensity-matching was performed based on age, BMI, smoking status, preoperative chemotherapy, and virtual surgery planning use, which yielded 159 patients in each group. ORN patients received more double-skin-island fibula flaps than non-OR patients (20.8% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.001). Recipient artery other than the facial artery was utilized more commonly in ORN patients (42.1% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001). In the unmatched cohort, ORN patients had higher rates of delayed wound healing (26.2% vs. 16.8%, p = 0.01) and surgical site infections (21.4% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.02). Rates of flap loss, return to the operating room, hematoma, operative time, and length of stay were similar between the groups. On logistic regression analysis, osteoradionecrosis was an independent risk factor for delayed wound healing.

CONCLUSION

Based on these data, mandibular reconstruction with fibula flaps for osteoradionecrosis appears more complicated than mandible reconstruction following de novo cancer resection. Surgeons should anticipate employing two skin islands for intraoral and extraoral resurfacing, utilizing unconventional recipient vessels, and managing the delayed wound healing that ensues more commonly than non-ORN patients.

Is the use of Pentoxifylline and Tocopherol effective in the treatment of Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws or for the treatment of medicationosteonecrosis of the jaw? An overview

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to determine the methodological quality of systematic reviews that evaluated the effectiveness of pentoxifylline and tocopherol (PENTO) in the treatment of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ).

METHODS

Searches were performed in Databases including PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, DARE, Cochrane Library, and SIGLE through OpenGrey until March 2024, were evaluated by two independent reviewers to answer the following question: Is the use of PENTO protocol effective in the treatment of ORNJ or for the treatment of MRONJ?

RESULTS

A total of 256 articles were initially identified; however, following the use of appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria, five systematic reviews were identified for detailed analysis. The final study sample comprised 588 patients: 397 patients with ORN and 197 patients with MRONJ who were treated with PENTO. The total recovery of individuals who used the PENTO protocol was 62,2 % for ORN and 100 % for MRONJ, with a follow-up period of 1 month to 10 years. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool, in which four were of low quality and 1 moderate quality.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of ORN and MRONJ with pentoxifylline and tocopherol has shown good results in the studies presented, with a partial or total reduction in bone exposure. However, the low quality of the relevant reports highlights the need for primary and secondary studies with better methodological rigor to reduce bias and provide reassurance for this treatment option.

Risk factors associated with the development of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in Head and Neck cancer patients in Ireland: A 10-year retrospective review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES

To assess osteoradionecrosis (ORN) incidence in a population of Irish Head and Neck cancer (HNC) patients, and assess precipitating factors that may contribute to ORN development to aid prevention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Review of 1050 HNC patients attending the Dental Oncology Clinic, CUDSH between 2010 and 2021 identified 47 cases of ORN. Medical, dental and radiotherapy records of these forty-seven patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patient-, tumour-, and treatment-related variables were investigated in association with osteoradionecrosis development. Analysis conducted using SPSS, Pearson's Chi-square test (p < 0.05), and ordinal regression model.

RESULTS

ORN incidence was 4.4 %. Median time from radiotherapy (RT) to ORN development was 9.5 months (range 1-98.5 months). ORN development within the mandibular surgical site was significant (p <.001), presenting at a higher Notani grade (p =.002), in mid-mandibular body region (p =.028), at radiation doses ≥ 60 Gy (p =.035), due to induced causes (p =.029), and without resolution (p =.019).

CONCLUSION

This is the first retrospective study of ORN in HNC patients in Ireland over 10-year period. ORN incidence was extremely low (4.4%). As patients reported high smoking/alcohol use and poor dental attendance pre-diagnosis, this suggests intensive dental intervention pre/post-diagnosis contributed to low ORN rates. Mandibular surgery pre-RT increased risk of developing ORN at the surgical site. Therefore, we recommend future treatment planning should contour the surgical site, designating it an organ at risk (OAR), assigning a dose constraint, where oncologically possible, with emphasis on reducing the hot-spot to this region; findings reinforce importance of life-long expert dental care to reduce ORN incidence.

Management of Palatal Defects after Free-Flap Reconstruction and Radiotherapy

Palatal fistulas have significant effects on quality of life. Traditional prosthetic rehabilitation and surgical reconstruction of palate defects in radiation-naïve tissues are well described. However, palatal fistulas developing after initial tumor extirpation, free-flap reconstruction, and adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation are associated with challenging secondary tissue effects. In this review, we will discuss the management of palatal fistulas after surgical reconstruction and radiotherapy.

Factors Associated with Treatment Outcomes and Pathological Features in Patients with Osteoradionecrosis: A Retrospective Study

A standard treatment for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) has not yet been established because of the diversity. Therefore, identifying the risk factors for a poor prognosis is essential. This study retrospectively investigated the factors associated with the prognosis of ORN in 68 patients. Relevant clinical data of all patients were obtained. Of the patients, 16 who underwent extensive surgery underwent histopathological analysis. The necrotic changes of the anterior and posterior margins in the cortical and cancellous bones were investigated. Multivariate analyses showed statistically significant associations between poor prognosis in patients with ORN and high radiation dose (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15), orocutaneous fistula (HR 2.93), and absence of sequestration (HR 2.49). Histopathological analysis showed a viable anterior margin of the middle portion of the cortical bone for all recovered cases; in contrast, most cases (75%) with a poor prognosis showed necrotic changes. The anterior margin of the cancellous bone was viable and resilient to high irradiation, regardless of the prognosis. These results suggest that patients with orocutaneous fistula should receive early surgical intervention, even if the affected area is limited or asymptomatic. In extensive surgery, a sufficient safety margin of necrotic bone, particularly in the anterior region, is required to improve the prognosis.