Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Current Knowledge and Future Directions

Two cases of vertebral perfusion disturbances in computer tomography imitating metastatic lesions in the course of superior vena cava thrombosis

Skeletal metastases are frequently observed in various malignancies. In some cases, they are asymptomatic and can be found incidentally in various imaging methods in patients without known malignant tumors. In this case study 2 cases of vertebral perfusion disturbances are presented that imitate vertebral metastatic lesions in computer tomography in the course of superior vena cava thrombosis. The first patient was referred to our clinic for chest and abdominal computer tomography (CT) for staging due to a known tumor in the anterior mediastinum. The second patient was referred for chest CT due to swelling in the upper extremity and neck, with the suspected diagnosis of a tumor or pulmonary embolism. In both cases, CT scans showed metastases suspected lesions in the upper thoracic vertebral bodies. In both cases, additionally, the thrombosis of superior vena cava (SVC) and vena brachiocephalica was confirmed (in the first case due to tumor compression in the upper mediastinum, in the second case due to the presence of pacemaker leads). In control CT scans after anticoagulation treatment, there were no suspected lesions in the vertebral bodies, which confirmed the diagnosis of vertebral perfusion disturbances in the course of SVC thrombosis in both patients. In conclusion, in rare cases of metastases suspected lesions of thoracic vertebral bodies in contrast-enhanced computer tomography among patients with a diagnosis of superior vena cava thrombosis vertebral perfusion disturbances should be included in differential diagnosis protocol.

Current Evidence for Endovascular Therapies in the Management of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis

Acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), specifically proximal iliofemoral DVT, is a relatively common disorder that can result in a chronic debilitating post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), with a significant effect on a patient's quality of life. Anticoagulation is first-line therapy; however, percutaneous interventions have emerged as treatment options for patients where there is concern that anticoagulation alone will not resolve the DVT as well as prevent PTS. This paper will discuss the existing data on these interventions and review current endovascular techniques, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, and large-bore mechanical thrombectomy in the management of DVT.

Upper extremity venous thrombosis in hospitalized patients: A prospective epidemiological study

BACKGROUND

The frequency of upper extremities vein thrombosis (UEVT) is rising with the increasing use of endovenous devices. These thromboses are particularly common among hospitalized patients. The epidemiology and risk factors for UEVT are poorly understood in a hospitalized population.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of UEVT in hospitalized patients and study thrombosis risk factors according to their location.

METHODS

Prospective evaluation of patients hospitalized in a university hospital with clinical and Doppler ultrasound (DUS) assessment of the upper extremities.

RESULTS

Of the 400 patients included, 91(22.8 %) had UEVT including 8 (8.8 %) proximal thrombosis, 32 (35.2 %) arm venous thrombosis and 51 (56.0 %) forearm venous thrombosis; 7 (7.7 %) patients with UEVT had a concomitant symptomatic pulmonary embolism. In this population of hospitalized patients, 40 (10 %) had proximal or arm thrombosis and 51 (12.8 %) forearm thrombosis. All patients with UEVT had a venous catheter and 63 (69.2 %) of UEVT patients had therapeutic or prophylactic anticoagulation at the time of DUS evaluation. In multivariate analysis, peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) OR 3.71 [1.90; 7.91] (p < 0.001); MID line OR 3.58 [1.46; 8.91] (p = 0.005) and infection disease OR 2.21 [1.26; 4386] (p = 0.005) were associated with UEVT. Central venous catheter OR 66.24 [12.64; 587.03] was associated with proximal UEVT and MID line OR 12.61 [4.64; 35.77] (p < 0.001) with arm UEVT. Forearm UEVT were associated with PIVCOR 10.71[3.14; 67.37] (p = 0.001); infectious disease OR 2.87 [1.48; 5.60] (p = 0.002), iron infusion OR 3.11 [1.23; 7.47] and hospitalization for postpartum OR 4.37 [0.97; 18.06] (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

One in 5 hospitalized patients suffers from UEVT. Proximal venous thrombosis is uncommon. The presence of a catheter and hospitalization for infection are the factors most frequently associated with UEVT.

Upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis and bilateral pulmonary embolism in a patient with COVID-19 under prophylactic anticoagulation: A case report

The COVID-19 infection induces coagulation dysfunction resulting in an increased incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT), mostly in the lower extremities. While upper-extremity DVT is less frequent than lower-extremity DVT, the thrombosis of internal jugular vein or brachiocephalic (innominate) vein is an uncommon presentation. All the current studies concerning the thrombotic risk linked to hospital COVID-19 indicate that therapeutic anticoagulation does not improve the clinical prognosis in the intensive care unit. Standard prophylactic anticoagulation is therefore recommended. But again, thrombotic complications of COVID-19 infection are still frequently reported nowadays despite anticoagulation therapy, as we can see in this case report. Here we report a rare case of a 50-year-old woman with a previous history of dyslipidemia, admitted for COVID-19 related acute respiratory failure. The patient developed during hospitalization an acute bilateral PE, with upper-extremity DVT including thrombosis of the left brachiocephalic vein extended to the left internal jugular vein, while under prophylactic anticoagulation since hospital admission, leading finally to the patient's death from respiratory failure. At present, the pathophysiology of the hypercoagulable state related to COVID-19 infection is poorly understood. The significant rate of thrombosis despite preventive and therapeutic dosage anticoagulation raises the possibility of a pathophysiology unique to COVID-19. This rare case highlights the importance of thrombotic morbidity and mortality associated with the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, and the need for further studies to better understand the physiopathology behind the thrombotic state of COVID 19 infection and establish a more efficient way to deal with these complications.

•

Thromboembolic complications are commonly associated with COVID-19 infection.

•

Thrombosis can occur at different location, requiring minutious examination and close interpretation of imaging.

•

Current recommendations indicate prophylactic anticoagulation for the thrombotic risk linked to hospital COVID-19 patients.

•

Thromboembolic complications of COVID-19 infection are frequently reported despite anticoagulation therapy.

•

The thrombotic state of COVID-19 infection may be related to a unique pathophysiology, wich may require specific therapy that is more effective than standard heparin anticoagulation.