Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Evolving Concepts and Therapies

Lung transplantation: Current insights and outcomes

Until now, the ability to predict or retard immune-mediated rejection events after lung transplantation is still limited due to the lack of specific biomarkers. The pressing need remains to early diagnose or predict the onset of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and its differential phenotypes that is the leading cause of death. Omics technologies (mainly genomics, epigenomics, and transcriptomics) combined with advanced bioinformatic platforms are clarifying the key immune-related molecular routes that trigger early and late events of lung allograft rejection supporting the biomarker discovery. The most promising biomarkers came from genomics. Both unregistered and NIH-registered clinical trials demonstrated that the increased percentage of donor-derived cell-free DNA in both plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid showed a good diagnostic performance for clinically silent acute rejection events and CLAD differential phenotypes. A further success arose from transcriptomics that led to development of Molecular Microscope® Diagnostic System (MMDx) to interpret the relationship between molecular signatures of lung biopsies and rejection events. Other immune-related biomarkers of rejection events may be exosomes, telomer length, DNA methylation, and histone-mediated neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) but none of them entered in registered clinical trials. Here, we discuss novel and existing technologies for revealing new immune-mediated mechanisms underlying acute and chronic rejection events, with a particular focus on emerging biomarkers for improving precision medicine of lung transplantation field.

Imaging of Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation is the only curative treatment for end-stage lung disease, which is caused by a wide variety of pathologies and encountered in a diverse range of patients. Potential recipients, as well as donors are carefully evaluated by imaging prior to transplant for contraindications to the transplant. After transplantation, recipients are imaged in the immediate, early, intermediate, and late periods for complications that may arise and require intervention. Radiography and computed tomography are the 2 most commonly used imaging modalities used to evaluate the chest after lung transplantation.

Results from randomized trial of pirfenidone in patients with chronic rejection (STOP-CLAD study)

BACKGROUND

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading long-term cause of poor outcomes after transplant and manifests by fibrotic remodeling of small airways and/or pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis. This study evaluated the effect of pirfenidone on quantitative radiographic and pulmonary function assessment in patients with CLAD.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of pirfenidone in patients with CLAD. Randomization was stratified by CLAD phenotype. The primary outcome for this study was change in radiographic assessment of small airways disease, quantified as percentage of lung volume using parametric response mapping analysis of computed tomography scans (PRMfSAD); secondary outcomes included change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), change in forced vital capacity (FVC), and change in radiographic quantification of parenchymal disease (PRMPD). Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the treatment effect on outcome measures.

RESULTS

The goal enrollment of 60 patients was not met due to the coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic, with 23 patients included in the analysis. There was no significant difference over the study period between the pirfenidone vs placebo groups with regards to the observed change in PRMfSAD (+4.2% vs -0.4%; p = 0.22), FEV1 (-3.5% vs -3.6%; p = 0.97), FVC (-1.9% vs -4.6%; p = 0.41), or PRMPD (-0.6% vs -2.5%; p = 0.30). The study treatment tolerance and adverse events were generally similar between the pirfenidone and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pirfenidone had no apparent impact on radiographic evidence of allograft dysfunction or pulmonary function decline in a single-center randomized trial of CLAD patients that did not meet enrollment goals but had an acceptable tolerance and side-effect profile.

Novel approaches for long-term lung transplant survival

Allograft failure remains a major barrier in the field of lung transplantation and results primarily from acute and chronic rejection. To date, standard-of-care immunosuppressive regimens have proven unsuccessful in achieving acceptable long-term graft and patient survival. Recent insights into the unique immunologic properties of lung allografts provide an opportunity to develop more effective immunosuppressive strategies. Here we describe advances in our understanding of the mechanisms driving lung allograft rejection and highlight recent progress in the development of novel, lung-specific strategies aimed at promoting long-term allograft survival, including tolerance.

Why Cell-Free DNA Can Be a “Game Changer” for Lung Allograft Monitoring for Rejection and Infection

Purpose of Review

Although there has been improvement in short-term clinical outcomes for patients following lung transplant (LT), advances have not translated into longer-term allograft survival. Furthermore, invasive biopsies are still standard of practice for monitoring LT recipients for allograft injury. We review the relevant literature supporting the role of using plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) as a non-invasive biomarker for LT allograft injury surveillance and discuss future research directions.

Recent Findings

Accumulating data has demonstrated that dd-cfDNA is associated with molecular and cellular injury due to acute (cellular and antibody-mediated) rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and relevant infectious pathogens. Strong performance in distinguishing rejection and allograft injury from stable patients has set the stage for clinical trials to assess dd-cfDNA utility for surveillance of LT patients. Research investigating the potential role of dd-cfDNA methylation signatures to map injured tissue and cell-free DNA in detecting allograft injury-related pathogens is ongoing.

Summary

There is an amassed breadth of clinical data to support a role for dd-cfDNA in monitoring rejection and other forms of allograft injury. Rigorously designed, robust clinical trials that encompass the diversity in patient demographics are paramount to furthering our understanding and adoption of plasma dd-cfDNA for surveillance of lung allograft health.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction Is Associated with Increased Levels of Cell-Free Mitochondrial DNA in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid of Lung Transplant Recipients

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) is a life-threatening complication that limits the long-term survival of lung transplantation patients. Early diagnosis remains the basis of efficient management of CLAD, making the need for distinctive biomarkers critical. This explorative study aimed to investigate the predictive power of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) derived from bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) to detect CLAD. The study included 106 lung transplant recipients and analyzed 286 BAL samples for cell count, cell differentiation, and inflammatory and mitochondrial biomarkers, including mtDNA. A receiver operating curve analysis of mtDNA levels was used to assess its ability to detect CLAD. The results revealed a discriminatory pro-inflammatory cytokine profile in the BAL fluid of CLAD patients. The concentration of mtDNA increased in step with each CLAD stage, reaching its highest concentration in stage 4, and correlated significantly with decreasing FEV1. The receiver operating curve analysis of mtDNA in BAL revealed a moderate prediction of CLAD when all stages were grouped together (AUROC 0.75, p-value < 0.0001). This study has found the concentration mtDNA in BAL to be a potential predictor for the early detection of CLAD and the differentiation of different CLAD stages, independent of the underlying pathology.

Graft dysfunction and rejection of lung transplant, a review on diagnosis and management

Introduction

Lung transplantation has proven to be an effective treatment option for end‐stage lung disease. However, early and late complications following transplantation remain significant causes of high mortality.

Objectives

In this review, we focus on the time of onset in primary graft dysfunction and rejection complications, as well as emphasize the role of imaging manifestations and pathological features in early diagnosis, thus assisting clinicians in the early detection and treatment of posttransplant complications and improving patient quality of life and survival.

Data source

We searched electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. We used the following search terms: lung transplantation complications, primary graft dysfunction, acute rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, radiological findings, and diagnosis and treatment.

Conclusion

Primary graft dysfunction, surgical complications, immune rejection, infections, and neoplasms represent major posttransplant complications. As the main posttransplant survival limitation, chronic lung allograft dysfunction has a characteristic imaging presentation; nevertheless, the clinical and imaging manifestations are often complex and overlap, so it is essential to understand the temporal evolution of these complications to narrow the differential diagnosis for early treatment to improve prognosis.

Early and late complications after lung transplantation remain essential causes of high mortality. In this review, we focus on the timing of the onset of primary graft dysfunction and rejection complications and highlight the role of imaging manifestations and clinicopathologic features in early diagnosis, thus assisting clinicians in the early detection and treatment of posttransplant complications and improving patient quality of life and survival.