1
|
Stagge F, Lanzi AM, Saylor AK, Cohen ML. Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scores Do Not Associate With Communication Challenges Reported by Adults With Alzheimer's Disease or Parkinson's Disease. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2024; 33:1902-1910. [PMID: 38713811 DOI: 10.1044/2024_ajslp-23-00248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSES Screening for cognitive-communication challenges in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or Parkinson's disease (PD) may benefit from multiple kinds of information about the client (e.g., patient-reported, performance-based). The purposes of this report are (a) to describe, using recently published score range descriptors (e.g., "mild," "moderate"), the patient-reported communication challenges of people with AD or PD using the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) and the Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure (ACOM); and (b) to examine the relationships between the performance-based Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a cognitive screener, and patient-reported CPIB and ACOM scores. METHOD Participants were a convenience sample of 49 community-dwelling adults with AD or PD. Participants completed the measures in person as part of a larger assessment battery. RESULTS MoCA total scores ranged from 7 to 28. CPIB T-scores fell in the following ranges: 31% were "within normal limits," 57% reflected "mildly" restricted participation, and 12% reflected "moderately" restricted participation. ACOM T-scores fell in the following ranges: 50% were either "within normal limits" or reflected "mild" impairment, 29% reflected "mild-moderately" impaired functional communication, and 21% reflected "moderately" impaired functional communication. There were only weak and nonsignificant correlations between T-scores on the ACOM or CPIB and scores on the MoCA, and there were no group differences on the ACOM or CPIB between individuals who screened positive versus negative on the MoCA. CONCLUSION When screening individuals with AD or PD, patient-reported communication challenges seem to be complementary to information provided by the MoCA and perhaps most useful in screening for mild communication challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith Stagge
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark
- Delaware Center for Cognitive Aging Research, University of Delaware, Newark
| | - Alyssa M Lanzi
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark
- Delaware Center for Cognitive Aging Research, University of Delaware, Newark
| | - Anna K Saylor
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark
- Delaware Center for Cognitive Aging Research, University of Delaware, Newark
| | - Matthew L Cohen
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark
- Delaware Center for Cognitive Aging Research, University of Delaware, Newark
- Center for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware, Newark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alons E, Brauner L, Luinge M, Terwee CB, van Ewijk L, Gerrits E. Identifying Relevant Concepts for the Development of a Communicative Participation Item Bank for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Existing Instruments. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2024; 67:1186-1205. [PMID: 38358947 DOI: 10.1044/2024_jslhr-23-00376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to systematically identify items that measure communicative participation from measurement instruments that measure (aspects of) communication and/or participation in children and adolescents (5-18 years old) with communication disorders, for developing an item bank. METHOD A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and Embase to search for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or parent reports measuring aspects of communication and/or participation in children and adolescents. The individual items of the included measurement instruments were reviewed on whether they measure communicative participation. The items were then classified into one of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for Children and Youth (World Health Organization, 2007) domains of activities and participation. RESULTS A total of 29 instruments were found, nine PROMs and 20 parent reports. One hundred forty-five items were identified that measure communicative participation. From these 145 items, 74 were retrieved from PROMs (51%), and 71 were retrieved from parent reports (49%). The majority of items were classified in ICF Domain 7, interpersonal interactions and relationships (73.8%), followed by Domain 8, major life areas (13.8%), and Domain 9, community, social, and civic life (8.3%). Only a few items were found in Domains 5 and 6, and none was found in Domains 1, 2, and 4. CONCLUSIONS We identified 145 items potentially useful for developing an item bank addressing communicative participation in children and adolescents with communication disorders. However, item development in collaboration with the target population is needed to ensure that these items fully reflect the construct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline Alons
- Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Institute for Language Sciences, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Laurien Brauner
- Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Institute for Language Sciences, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet Luinge
- Centre of Expertise Healthy Ageing and Youth, Education and Society, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, the Netherlands
- Methodology Program, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, the Netherlands
| | - Lizet van Ewijk
- Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Gerrits
- Research Centre for Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Institute for Language Sciences, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baylor C, Bamer A, Brown C, Jin JL, Teixeira J, Nuara M. The Communicative Participation Item Bank-Gender-Diverse Version: Item Bank Calibration and Short Form. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2024; 33:952-968. [PMID: 38232175 DOI: 10.1044/2023_ajslp-23-00260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to calibrate an item set for a new version of the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) specifically for use with gender-diverse clients. This new version contains a new item stem as well as other minor wording changes from the original CPIB in order to be acceptable to gender-diverse respondents. METHOD Survey data on 47 candidate items were collected from 434 transgender individuals: 219 assigned female at birth (AFAB) and 215 assigned male at birth (AMAB). Item response theory analyses included evaluation of unidimensionality, local dependence, fit to a graded response model, and differential item functioning (DIF) between AFAB and AMAB respondents. RESULTS The original set of 47 items was unidimensional, but 16 items were removed due to local dependence, resulting in a final item bank of 31 items. There was no evidence of DIF between AFAB and AMAB participants. Reliability of the full item bank is good (i.e., > 0.8) between T scores of 20 and 76 and high (i.e., > 0.9) between T scores of 20 and 68. The short form had good reliability (i.e., > 0.8) between T scores of 24 and 64. CONCLUSIONS The Communicative Participation Item Bank-Gender-Diverse (CPIB-GD) version provides a new option for person-reported outcome measurement with gender-diverse clients. Clinicians are cautioned to use only the new CPIB-GD with gender-diverse clients, and not the original CPIB due to unacceptable wording in the original version for this population. The original CPIB remains valid and appropriate for the populations for which it was developed. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24993309.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Baylor
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Alyssa Bamer
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Cait Brown
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jingyu Linna Jin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jeffrey Teixeira
- Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Otolaryngology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
| | - Michael Nuara
- Department of Otolaryngology, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baylor C, Linna Jin J, Mach H, Britton D. Communicative participation outcomes in individuals with Parkinson's disease receiving standard care speech-language therapy services in community settings. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2024; 59:808-827. [PMID: 37855252 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) designed to measure the extent of interference, or difficulty, experienced by adults with communication disorders participating in their day-to-day communication activities. To date, there is limited evidence regarding sensitivity of the CPIB for capturing change with intervention in people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD). AIMS The purpose of this study was to examine the following measurement properties of the CPIB in PwPD who received community-based, standard care, speech-language therapy focusing on motor speech concerns: Change over time between treatment and observation groups, comparison to patient-defined ideal and satisfactory targets, comparison of static short form to computerised adaptive testing (CAT), comparison of self to proxy-rated scores, and comparison to other common PROMs. METHODS AND PROCEDURES Forty-six PwPD (20 treatment/26 observation) completed data collection upon enrolment (pre-treatment) and 6 months later. In addition to the CPIB, PROMs included the Voice Handicap Index 10-item short form (VHI-10), PROMIS Global Health-Related Quality of Life, Levels of Speech Usage, self-rated speech severity, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Participants also engaged in qualitative interviews. Forty-four family members completed proxy CPIB ratings. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS There were no significant differences between treatment and observation groups on the CPIB pre-treatment, but there were significant differences post-treatment. The differences appeared to be largely due to significant gains in the treatment group. No participants reached their ideal CPIB target, and few reached their satisfactory target. Static CPIB short form and CAT scores were not significantly different, with an average of five CAT items administered per participant. Overall group similarities between patient and proxy scores may have obscured wide variability across individual patient-proxy pairs. Associations between CPIB and VHI-10, health-related quality of life, self-reported speech severity, and depression ranged from weak to moderate. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The CPIB appears to be sensitive to capturing change with intervention, and similar results are obtained with the static short form and CAT formats. One clinical caution is that even with gains observed in the treatment group, no participants obtained their ideal communicative participation goals, and few obtained a satisfactory level of communicative participation. Thus, while current interventions are beneficial, they may not meet the full range of clients' communication needs. While responding to the CPIB through a proxy rater may be feasible, caution is warranted due to concerns about maintaining the autonomy of PwPD. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on this subject The communication disorders associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) can have a negative impact on quality of life and life participation as measured by patient (or person)-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) is one PROM available to use with adults with communication disorders. However, little is known about whether the CPIB captures changes in communicative participation as a result of standard care treatment for people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD). Use of computerised adaptive testing (CAT), proxy report and comparison to targeted participation outcomes have not been explored. What this study adds to existing knowledge As a result of this study, we know that the CPIB captured differences between treatment and observation groups after community-based, standard care speech therapy intervention focusing on motor speech production in PwPD. Static short form and CAT scores did not differ significantly, so the CAT option provides better efficiency requiring, on average, five items to administer compared to the 10-item short form. Proxy and PwPD scores did not differ as a group, but wide variability was noted. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The CPIB may be a clinically sensitive instrument for capturing changes in communicative participation after treatment. No participants met their ideal CPIB target, and few reached their satisfactory target, suggesting that while current interventions contribute to gains in communicative participation, there are still unmet needs that may call for support and interventions addressing the more complex array of factors affecting communicative participation outcomes for PwPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Baylor
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jingyu Linna Jin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Helen Mach
- Department Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Deanna Britton
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gallée J, Tilton-Bolowsky VE, Stark BC. The Communication Success Screener: A Preliminary Investigation of Perceived Communicative Success Across Modalities, Environments, and Demands. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2024; 67:149-169. [PMID: 37956866 PMCID: PMC11000814 DOI: 10.1044/2023_jslhr-23-00171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Behavioral intervention targeting speech, language, and communication concerns is an established therapeutic approach for patients with communication concerns across a range of acquired neurogenic disorders. The multidimensional factors that contribute to a person's self-identified communication challenges and strengths in their daily communication needs must be considered to provide functional and person-centered care. While assessments grounded in clinician observation or client self-report exist, there is a direct need for a screening tool that comprehensively evaluates the roles of modality (verbal, text, gesture) and environment (in-person, virtual) on self-reported success across communicative demands. In this study, we describe a preliminary approach to monitoring the progression of receptive and expressive communication skills in people with chronic poststroke aphasia in the context of communication practices of the 21st century, culminating in the development and exploratory implementation of a novel clinical instrument: the Communication Success Screener (COMSS). METHOD Thirty-three participants with aphasia due to stroke were recruited to complete and evaluate the COMSS via an online survey. Quantitative responses and open-ended participant feedback were collected to validate and propose adaptations to the COMSS. Group-level analyses and case presentations were used to highlight COMSS features and outcomes. RESULTS Participant responses to the COMSS questionnaire suggest that this screening tool creates differentiated communicative success profiles based on self-report. Participant feedback also indicated that the COMSS appropriately evaluates self-reported success across modalities of verbal, text, and gesture in the context of in-person and virtual environments. CONCLUSIONS The communication concerns experienced by people with aphasia are often heterogeneous and vary as a function of their daily activities of living, preferred language modalities, and environmental supports. We present preliminary feasibility analyses of the COMSS as a potential tool to support the monitoring of functional change by evaluating self-reported communicative success across form, modality, environment, and task demand. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24521044.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne Gallée
- Department of Psychology, Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown, MA
| | | | - Brielle C. Stark
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leaman MC, Edmonds LA. Pilot Results for ECoLoGiC-Tx: A New Conversation-Level Intervention Improving Language in People With Moderate to Severe Aphasia. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2024; 33:153-172. [PMID: 37934890 DOI: 10.1044/2023_ajslp-23-00141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study reports pilot data for a novel intervention, ECoLoGiC-Tx, delivered to four people with moderate to severe aphasia. ECoLoGiC-Tx addresses language and communication in unstructured, participant-led conversation. The speech-language pathologist (SLP) uses a framework to choose turns that facilitate a social interaction. When communication breakdown occurs, the SLP implements a least-to-most hierarchy to maximize the people with aphasia's (PWA's) independence in self-repair. ECoLoGiC-Tx draws its theoretical underpinnings from conversation analysis and theories of rehabilitation, including principles of complexity, neuroplasticity, and learning. METHOD Four PWA attended 60-min sessions twice weekly for 10 weeks. Assessment occurred at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 6-week maintenance. Outcomes included established discourse measures for conversation and monologue, tests of language and functional communication, and patient-/family-reported outcome measures (P/FROMs). Discourse samples were collected three times per assessment. Interrater reliability and fidelity for assessment and treatment procedures are reported. RESULTS Participants presented with Broca's aphasia (one moderate, one severe) or conduction aphasia (one moderate, one severe). Each demonstrated improvements in discourse, test batteries, and P/FROMs. They all demonstrated reduced aphasia severity measured by the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised at posttreatment or maintenance. Change in conversation and monologue was robust for three participants, but was mixed for one person (P1: moderate Broca's aphasia). P/FROMs indicated improvement at posttreatment and maintenance for all participants. Most treatment gains were maintained at 6-week follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This study provides promising results for ECoLoGiC-Tx to improve language function of people with chronic moderate to severe aphasia. Generalization occurred to tests, functional communication, spontaneous conversation, and structured monologue tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lisa A Edmonds
- Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Utianski RL, Martin PR, Duffy JR, Clark HM, Stierwalt JAG, Botha H, Ali F, Whitwell JL, Josephs KA. Assessing Patients and Care Partner Ratings of Communication-Related Participation Restrictions: Insights From Degenerative Disease. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2023; 32:1793-1805. [PMID: 36758199 PMCID: PMC10561959 DOI: 10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prior studies have shown that communication-related participation restrictions in patients with degenerative disease do not always match clinician judgment or objective indices of symptom severity. Although there is a growing body of literature documenting that discrepancies between patients with dementia and their care partners' perception of participation restrictions exist, it is not known how care partner perceptions of communication participation restrictions specifically match or diverge from the patients' experiences, which may inform the use of care partner proxy in the context of degenerative diseases. METHOD Thirty-eight patients with progressive neurologic conditions (progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal syndrome, and primary progressive aphasia or apraxia of speech) and, in most instances, focal cognitive-communication disorders were included. The patients and their accompanying care partners independently completed the Communicative Participation Item Bank, short form, a 10-question survey about communication participation restrictions in different contexts. Care partners were instructed to complete the form with their perception of the patient's experience. The difference between patient and care partner total scores were calculated and analyzed relative to clinical and demographic variables of interest. RESULTS Care partner ratings modestly tracked with patient experience and objective indices of symptom severity but did not exactly match patient ratings. The presence of aphasia increased, but did not fully account for, the likelihood of a discrepancy between care partner and patient ratings. CONCLUSION Although careful consideration should be given prior to using care-partner report as a proxy for patient experience, it is worthwhile to include care partner ratings as a means of supporting conversations about differing perceptions, guiding joint intervention planning, and monitoring care-partner perceptions of change along with the implementation of supported conversation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter R. Martin
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | - Hugo Botha
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Farwa Ali
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ter Wal N, van Ewijk L, Visser-Meily JMA, Volkmer A, Gerrits E, Terwee CB. Further development in measuring communicative participation: identifying items to extend the applicability of the communicative participation item bank. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:49. [PMID: 37237158 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00586-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ability to communicate is a prerequisite for participation in today's society. To measure participation in adults with communication disorders, the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) was developed in 2006. Since then, several new PROMs have been developed to measure communication and the impact of communication disorders on participation. Moreover, the CPIB items do not all appear to be relevant to certain populations with communication problems and context of communicative participation is changing rapidly, given the increased use of digital communication forms. The purpose of this study was to identify new PROMs developed since 2006 that aim to measure (aspects of) communication, in order to select items that are suitable for expanding the Communicative Participation Item Bank to make the item bank more widely applicable (e.g., to the hearing-impaired population) and tailored to the current societal context. METHODS Medline and Embase were used to search for PROMs that aim to measure (aspects of) communication. Each new PROM as well as the CPIB, was evaluated to determine to what extent it contains items that measure communicative participation and to what extent these items capture all communicative participation domains by linking each item to the ICF Activities and Participation domains. RESULTS This study identified 31 new PROMs, containing 391 items that were labelled as measuring communicative participation. The majority of the 391 items measure aspects of ICF Activities and Participation domain 'communication', followed by the domain 'interpersonal interactions and relationships'. The other ICF Activity and Participation domains were less often addressed. Analysis of the CPIB showed that items do not cover all domains of participation as defined in the ICF, such as the 'major life areas' domain. CONCLUSIONS We found a potential pool of 391 items measuring communicative participation that could be considered for extending the CPIB. We found items in domains that are already present in the CPIB, but also items that relate to new domains, such as an item on talking with customers or clients for the 'major life areas' domain. Inclusion of new items in other domains would benefit the comprehensiveness of the item bank.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Ter Wal
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, P.O. box 12011, Utrecht, 3501 AA, The Netherlands.
- Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Lizet van Ewijk
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, P.O. box 12011, Utrecht, 3501 AA, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Visser-Meily
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Centre of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, University Medical Centre Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Volkmer
- Department of Language and Cognition, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ellen Gerrits
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, P.O. box 12011, Utrecht, 3501 AA, The Netherlands
- Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fergadiotis G, Casilio M, Dickey MW, Steel S, Nicholson H, Fleegle M, Swiderski A, Hula WD. Item Response Theory Modeling of the Verb Naming Test. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2023; 66:1718-1739. [PMID: 37000934 PMCID: PMC10457085 DOI: 10.1044/2023_jslhr-22-00458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Item response theory (IRT) is a modern psychometric framework with several advantageous properties as compared with classical test theory. IRT has been successfully used to model performance on anomia tests in individuals with aphasia; however, all efforts to date have focused on noun production accuracy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the Verb Naming Test (VNT), a prominent test of action naming, can be successfully modeled under IRT and evaluate its reliability. METHOD We used responses on the VNT from 107 individuals with chronic aphasia from AphasiaBank. Unidimensionality and local independence, two assumptions prerequisite to IRT modeling, were evaluated using factor analysis and Yen's Q 3 statistic (Yen, 1984), respectively. The assumption of equal discrimination among test items was evaluated statistically via nested model comparisons and practically by using correlations of resulting IRT-derived scores. Finally, internal consistency, marginal and empirical reliability, and conditional reliability were evaluated. RESULTS The VNT was found to be sufficiently unidimensional with the majority of item pairs demonstrating adequate local independence. An IRT model in which item discriminations are constrained to be equal demonstrated fit equivalent to a model in which unique discrimination parameters were estimated for each item. All forms of reliability were strong across the majority of IRT ability estimates. CONCLUSIONS Modeling the VNT using IRT is feasible, yielding ability estimates that are both informative and reliable. Future efforts are needed to quantify the validity of the VNT under IRT and determine the extent to which it measures the same construct as other anomia tests. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22329235.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marianne Casilio
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Michael Walsh Dickey
- Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA
- VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, PA
| | - Stacey Steel
- Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, OR
| | - Hannele Nicholson
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Minneapolis Healthcare System, MN
| | - Mikala Fleegle
- Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, OR
| | - Alexander Swiderski
- Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA
- VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, PA
| | - William D Hula
- Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA
- VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, PA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ter Wal N, van Ewijk L, Dijkhuis L, Visser-Meily JMA, Terwee CB, Gerrits E. Everyday Barriers in Communicative Participation According to People With Communication Problems. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2023; 66:1033-1050. [PMID: 36787154 DOI: 10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to gain a comprehensive understanding of participation situations that are challenging for people with communication problems, to provide input for the further development of potential items for the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB). METHOD A purposive sampling strategy was used to include a diverse group of people with communication problems. Diaries were used as a sensitizing exercise for inductive in-depth interviews. In these interviews, elements of communicative participation situations (concepts) were elicited that participants themselves experienced as difficult because of their communication problem. A thematic content analysis was used to identify overarching themes. In addition, new items were formulated based on the raw codes of the transcripts and linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Activity and Participation domains to examine the distribution of items across the breadth of the construct of communicative participation. RESULTS Eighteen interviews yielded 44 different concepts. They were clustered in six themes, which capture the person, location, topic, mode, moment, and pace of communication. In total, 103 new items measuring communicative participation were formulated. Most of these items relate to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Activity and Participation domains "interpersonal interactions and relationships," "major life areas," and "community, social, and civic life." CONCLUSIONS This study resulted in an overview of self-reported barriers in daily communicative participation experienced by people with communication problems. These communicative participation situations can be captured within 44 concepts, which are covered by six themes. Future work should investigate if the newly written items can be added to the CPIB. The concepts and the themes can be used in designing and delivering a participation-focused intervention for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Ter Wal
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Institute for Language Sciences (ILS), Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Lizet van Ewijk
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lotti Dijkhuis
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Visser-Meily
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Centre of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht and Utrecht University, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Gerrits
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Institute for Language Sciences (ILS), Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Teixeira J, Jin JL, Baylor C, Nuara M. Modifying the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) for individuals receiving gender-affirming communication care: Stakeholder feedback from cognitive interviews. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2023; 102:106312. [PMID: 36791644 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) is a person-reported outcome measure designed for adults with communication disorders. The CPIB has not been validated for use with clients seeking gender-affirming communication care. The purpose of this study was to determine modifications needed to the CPIB for it to be appropriate for transgender respondents. METHODS Individual qualitative cognitive interviews were conducted with 14 transgender adults (seven assigned male at birth, six assigned female at birth, one intersex / assigned female at birth). As participants completed the CPIB, they were asked to 'think out loud' to share their reactions to the items, reasons for their item responses, and any recommendations for changing the CPIB. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to identify common and salient trends in participants' feedback. RESULTS The most salient change participants required was in the CPIB item stem. The original stem ("Does your condition interfere with….") is inappropriate for transgender clients because referring to being transgender as a 'condition' is unacceptable. A new stem ("How difficult is it for you to ….") was acceptable to participants. The original CPIB uses the phrase 'family and friends' to refer to safe and comfortable communication partners. Participants in this study reported that this does not reflect the experiences of many transgender people who are not accepted by their biological families. The recommended alternate wording is "people who know you well." The items reflected situations that were relevant to participants, and wording was acceptable with few exceptions. Participants suggested they would have responded to the CPIB items differently earlier in their transition, with their scores improving over time. CONCLUSIONS The original CPIB questionnaire should not be used with transgender clients due to unacceptable wording. The modified items generated from this study require psychometric calibration for a new CPIB version for clients seeking gender-affirming communication care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Teixeira
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States.
| | - Jingyu Linna Jin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Box 356490, Seattle, WA 98195, United States
| | - Carolyn Baylor
- Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, United States
| | - Michael Nuara
- Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 9th Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Sluis KE, Passchier E, van Son RJJH, van der Molen L, Stuiver M, van den Brekel MWM, Van den Steen L, Kalf JG, van Nuffelen G. Dutch translation and validation of the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB)-short form. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2023; 58:124-137. [PMID: 36063423 PMCID: PMC10087551 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several conditions and diseases can result in speech problems that can have a negative impact on everyday functioning, referred to as communicative participation. Subjective problems with acquired speech problems are often assessed with the speech handicap index (SHI). To assess generic participation problems, the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P) questionnaire is frequently used. The English questionnaire Communicative Participation Item Bank-short form (CPIB short form) is a 10-item valid, reliable instrument that assesses communicative participation. In the absence of a Dutch equivalent, translation and validation of the CPIB short form was required. AIMS To translate the CPIB short form into Dutch, and to determine its psychometric properties for the group of adults with speech problems resulting from a neurological aetiology or head and neck cancer. METHODS & PROCEDURES Translation of the CPIB short form was performed following the instructions of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC). In a cross-sectional multi-centre study, participants completed the Dutch CPIB short form together with the SHI and USER-P, and the CPIB a second time after 2 weeks. We assessed internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the CPIB. Construct validity was assessed based on correlations with SHI, USER-P and speech assessments. OUTCOMES & RESULTS In the validation study, 122 participants were included: 51 with dysarthria due to different neurological disorders, 48 with speech problems due to head and neck cancer treatment and 23 healthy controls. Internal consistency of the items was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.962), the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability was high 0.908 (95% CI = 0.870-0.935). Construct validity was supported by a strong correlation between the Dutch CPIB short form and the SHI total score (SHI total rs = 0.887) and a moderate correlation between the Dutch CPIB-10 and the USER-P subscales (USER-P Frequency rs = 0.365; USER-P restrictions and USER-P satisfaction rs = 0.546). A moderate correlation was found between the Dutch CPIB-10 and the speech performance assessments (degree of distortedness r = -0.0557; p ≤ 0.001; degree of intelligibility r = 0.0562). CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS The Dutch CPIB short form provides a valid and reliable tool for clinical practice and research purposes. It allows clinicians to start using this PROM in clinical and research practice to systematically investigate the impact of the speech problems on communicative participation in a Dutch-speaking population. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject Communicative participation allows people to take part in life situations, but can be affected by acquired speech problems. The CPIB is a patient-reported outcome measure for the assessment of this concept. For the English language the 46-item bank and a 10-item short form is available. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This paper describes the process of translation of the CPIB short form into Dutch, and confirms its reproducibility and validity. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? With this validated Dutch version of the CPIB short form available, professionals can implement this tool in clinical and research practice to systematically evaluate communicative participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaske E. van Sluis
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryNetherlands Cancer Institute‐Antoni van LeeuwenhoekAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Center for Language and CommunicationUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Ellen Passchier
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryNetherlands Cancer Institute‐Antoni van LeeuwenhoekAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Center for Quality of Life and Division of Psychosocial Research and EpidemiologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Rob J. J. H. van Son
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryNetherlands Cancer Institute‐Antoni van LeeuwenhoekAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Center for Language and CommunicationUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Lisette van der Molen
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryNetherlands Cancer Institute‐Antoni van LeeuwenhoekAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Center for Language and CommunicationUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Martijn Stuiver
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryNetherlands Cancer Institute‐Antoni van LeeuwenhoekAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Center for Quality of Life and Division of Psychosocial Research and EpidemiologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Center of Expertise Urban VitalityFaculty of HealthAmsterdam University of Applied SciencesAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Michiel W. M. van den Brekel
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and SurgeryNetherlands Cancer Institute‐Antoni van LeeuwenhoekAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Center for Language and CommunicationUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Leen Van den Steen
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery—Rehabilitation Center for Communication DisordersAntwerp University HospitalAntwerpBelgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
| | - Johanna G. Kalf
- Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical CenterDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - Gwen van Nuffelen
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery—Rehabilitation Center for Communication DisordersAntwerp University HospitalAntwerpBelgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversity of GhentGhentBelgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dahl KL, Bolognone RK, Childes JM, Pryor RL, Graville DJ, Palmer AD. Characteristics associated with communicative participation after total laryngectomy. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2022; 96:106184. [PMID: 35091361 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to identify individual characteristics that are associated with communicative participation after total laryngectomy (TL). METHODS This study was a single-institution investigation of individuals who had undergone TL. Data were collected at a single timepoint via patient self-report and medical record review. Thirty-five participants completed a questionnaire containing a communication survey as well as several published, validated instruments. Independent variables included characteristics related to demographics, health and medical history, social network composition, and communication. The dependent variable was communicative participation, which was assessed using the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB). Correlations between the independent variables and CPIB scores were calculated to assess the influence of these characteristics on communicative participation. The study participants were subdivided into three distinct groups based on whether their primary method of communication was spoken or non-spoken and the frequency of using alternate methods of communication. Outcomes across the three groups were then compared. A follow-up survey was also conducted to examine the impact of "stay at home" orders during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020-21. RESULTS There were significant correlations between communicative participation and some non-communication-related characteristics. Reduced communicative participation was associated with younger age, less time since TL, a history of reconstructive surgery, poorer self-rated health, more depressive symptoms, worse quality of life, and a weaker social network of friends. Several communication-related characteristics were also associated with CPIB scores. Increased communicative participation was associated with using fewer non-spoken communication methods, higher levels of satisfaction with speech and communication, and better communicative effectiveness. There were significant differences between the three groups for communicative effectiveness and satisfaction with speech. The three groups did not differ significantly for satisfaction with communication or communicative participation. There were no significant differences in CPIB scores measured before and during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS Communicative participation is a complex measure that may be affected by a variety of factors related to demographics, health, social network status, and communication. Despite poorer communicative effectiveness and lower levels of satisfaction, individuals who use non-spoken methods of communication after TL did not demonstrate worse communicative participation than those using spoken methods. Surprisingly, CPIB scores did not decline as a result of social distancing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly L Dahl
- NW Center for Voice & Swallowing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 Mail Code: CH15-E, 3303 SW Bond Ave., SW Sam Jackson Rd., Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| | - Rachel K Bolognone
- NW Center for Voice & Swallowing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 Mail Code: CH15-E, 3303 SW Bond Ave., SW Sam Jackson Rd., Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| | - Jana M Childes
- NW Center for Voice & Swallowing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 Mail Code: CH15-E, 3303 SW Bond Ave., SW Sam Jackson Rd., Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| | - Rebecca L Pryor
- NW Center for Voice & Swallowing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 Mail Code: CH15-E, 3303 SW Bond Ave., SW Sam Jackson Rd., Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| | - Donna J Graville
- NW Center for Voice & Swallowing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 Mail Code: CH15-E, 3303 SW Bond Ave., SW Sam Jackson Rd., Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| | - Andrew D Palmer
- NW Center for Voice & Swallowing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 Mail Code: CH15-E, 3303 SW Bond Ave., SW Sam Jackson Rd., Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|