IDH Wild-type Glioblastoma Presenting with Seizure: Clinical Specificity, and Oncologic and Surgical Outcomes

To be or not to be: The dilemma over the prognostic role of epilepsy at presentation in patients with glioblastoma - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Despite some evidence of a possible link between epileptogenesis and tumorigenesis in glioblastoma, the prognostic value of epilepsy at presentation has been debated over the years. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize all published data evaluating the prognostic significance of seizures as a presenting manifestation of glioblastoma. A comprehensive search of five databases from inception to December 2023 was conducted. Included studies underwent meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses performed to identify sources of heterogeneity. Fifteen studies were included in the analysis. Seizures were considered a favorable prognostic factor in seven studies, while eight studies found no differences in overall survival between patients with seizures and those with other presenting symptoms. Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled analysis indicated a potentially favorable prognostic impact of seizures at the clinical onset of glioblastoma (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.61-0.87). However, subgroup analysis within studies focusing on IDH-wild type cases showed no discernible impact from preoperative seizures. Retrospective design, poor quality in reporting results, and heterogeneity in tumor characteristics and therapies are the main limitations of included studies.Future prospective studies on large, homogeneous cohorts of patients with IDH-wild type glioblastoma are warranted. Overall, these findings suggest that while seizures may hold some prognostic value, further research is essential to clarify their role. Understanding the true prognostic role of seizures at clinical onset may enhance our ability to predict patient outcomes and guide clinical decision-making.

Do presenting symptoms predict treatment decisions and survival in glioblastoma? Real-world data from 1458 patients in the Swedish brain tumor registry

Background

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults. Non-invasive clinical parameters could play a crucial role in treatment planning and serve as predictors of patient survival. Our register-based real-life study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of presenting symptoms.

Methods

Data on presenting symptoms and survival, as well as known prognostic factors, were retrieved for all glioblastoma patients in Sweden registered in the Swedish Brain Tumor Registry between 2018 and 2021. The prognostic impact of different presenting symptoms was calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

Data from 1458 adults with pathologically verified IDH wild-type glioblastoma were analyzed. Median survival time was 345 days. The 2-year survival rate was 21.5%. Registered presenting symptoms were focal neurological deficits, cognitive dysfunction, headache, epilepsy, signs of raised intracranial pressure, and cranial nerve symptoms, with some patients having multiple symptoms. Patients with initial cognitive dysfunction had significantly shorter survival than patients without; 265 days (245-285) vs. 409 days (365-453; P < .001). The reduced survival remained after Cox regression adjusting for known prognostic factors. Patients presenting with seizures and patients with headaches had significantly longer overall survival compared to patients without these symptoms, but the difference was not retained in multivariate analysis. Patients with cognitive deficits were less likely to have radical surgery and to receive extensive anti-neoplastic nonsurgical treatment.

Conclusions

This extensive real-life study reveals that initial cognitive impairment acts as an independent negative predictive factor for treatment decisions and adversely affects survival outcomes in glioblastoma patients.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown on the Outcome of Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

 Rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2020 led to an indirect effect on non-COVID patients. Since neuro-oncology cases are unique and brain tumors need a specific therapeutic protocol at proper doses and at the right times, the effects of the pandemic on health care services for patients with glioblastomas (GBs) and their impact on overall survival (OS) and quality of life are not yet known.

METHODS

 We conducted a retrospective study of 142 GB patients who underwent surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy before and after the lockdown period, aiming to determine the differences in access to care, treatment modality, and adjuvant therapies, and how the lockdown changed the prognosis.

RESULTS

 The number of procedures performed for GB during the pandemic was comparable to that of the prepandemic period, and patients received standard care. There was a significant difference in the volume of lesions measured at diagnosis with a decreased number of "accidental" diagnoses and expression of a reduced use by the patient for a checkup or follow-up examinations. Patients expressed a significantly lower performance index in the lockdown period with longer progression-free survival (PFS) in the face of a comparable mean time to OS.

CONCLUSION

 Patients treated surgically for GB during the pandemic period had a more pronounced and earlier reduction in performance status than patients treated during the same period the year before. This appears to be primarily due to lower levels of care in the rehabilitation centers and more frequent discontinuation of adjuvant care.

Quantitative Assessment of Tumor Contact with Neurogenic Zones and Its Effects on Survival: Insights beyond Traditional Predictors

So far, the cellular origin of glioblastoma (GBM) needs to be determined, with prevalent theories suggesting emergence from transformed endogenous stem cells. Adult neurogenesis primarily occurs in two brain regions: the subventricular zone (SVZ) and the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the hippocampal dentate gyrus. Whether the proximity of GBM to these neurogenic niches affects patient outcome remains uncertain. Previous studies often rely on subjective assessments, limiting the reliability of those results. In this study, we assessed the impact of GBM's relationship with the cortex, SVZ and SGZ on clinical variables using fully automated segmentation methods. In 177 glioblastoma patients, we calculated optimal cutpoints of minimal distances to the SVZ and SGZ to distinguish poor from favorable survival. The impact of tumor contact with neurogenic zones on clinical parameters, such as overall survival, multifocality, MGMT promotor methylation, Ki-67 and KPS score was also examined by multivariable regression analysis, chi-square test and Mann-Whitney-U. The analysis confirmed shorter survival in tumors contacting the SVZ with an optimal cutpoint of 14 mm distance to the SVZ, separating poor from more favorable survival. In contrast, tumor contact with the SGZ did not negatively affect survival. We did not find significant correlations with multifocality or MGMT promotor methylation in tumors contacting the SVZ, as previous studies discussed. These findings suggest that the spatial relationship between GBM and neurogenic niches needs to be assessed differently. Objective measurements disprove prior assumptions, warranting further research on this topic.

Characteristics and Prognosis of Tumor-Related Epilepsy During Tumor Evolution in Patients With IDH Wild-Type Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tumor-related epilepsy is a well-known symptom of glioblastoma. However, the particular characteristics of epileptic seizures related to glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wild-type is almost unexplored longitudinally during the whole course of the disease. We assessed tumor-related epilepsy and seizure control during tumor evolution and the prognostic significance of tumor-related epilepsy.

METHODS

We performed an observational, retrospective single-center study at one tertiary referral neuro-oncology surgical center (2000-2020). We included adult patients treated for a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wild-type with available preoperative and postoperative MRI and with available epileptic seizure status at diagnosis. To determine factors associated with tumor-related epilepsy or seizure control, univariate analyses were performed using the χ2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and the unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney rank-sum test for continuous variables. Predictors associated with tumor-related epilepsy and seizure control in unadjusted analysis were entered into backward stepwise logistic regression models.

RESULTS

One thousand six patients were enrolled. The cumulative incidence of tumor-related epilepsy increased during tumor evolution (33.1% at diagnosis, 44.7% after oncologic treatment, 52.4% at progression, and 51.8% at the end-of-life phase) and is related to tumor features (cortex involvement, no necrosis, and small volume). Uncontrolled epileptic seizures increased during tumor evolution (20.1% at diagnosis, 32.0% after oncologic treatment, 46.7% at progression, and 41.1% at the end-of-life phase). Epileptic seizure control after oncologic treatment was related to seizure features (uncontrolled before oncologic treatment and focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic seizures) and to the extent of resection. Epileptic seizure control at tumor progression was related to seizure features (presence at diagnosis and uncontrolled after oncologic treatment) and to the time to progression. Tumor-related epilepsy at diagnosis was a predictor of a longer overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI 0.67-0.90; p < 0.001) independent of age, Karnofsky Performance Status score, tumor location and volume, extent of resection, standard combined chemoradiotherapy, levetiracetam use, and MGMT promoter methylation.

DISCUSSION

The progression of tumor-related epilepsy with the evolution of glioblastoma, IDH-wild-type and the effects of surgery on seizure control argue for proper antiseizure medication and maximal safe resection. Tumor-related epilepsy is an independent predictor of a longer survival.

Status epilepticus in patients with glioblastoma: Clinical characteristics, risk factors, and epileptological outcome

PURPOSE

Epilepsy is a common comorbidity in patients with glioblastoma, however, clinical data on status epilepticus (SE) in these patients is sparse. We aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with the occurrence and adverse outcomes of SE in glioblastoma patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed electronic medical records of patients with de-novo glioblastoma treated at our institution between 01/2006 and 01/2020 and collected data on patient, tumour, and SE characteristics.

RESULTS

In the final cohort, 292/520 (56.2 %) patients developed seizures, with 48 (9.4 % of the entire cohort and 16.4 % of patients with epilepsy, PWE) experiencing SE at some point during the course of their disease. SE was the first symptom of the tumour in 6 cases (1.2 %) and the first manifestation of epilepsy in 18 PWE (6.2 %). Most SE episodes occurred postoperatively (n = 37, 77.1 %). SE occurrence in PWE was associated with postoperative seizures and drug-resistant epilepsy. Adverse outcome (in-house mortality or admission to palliative care, 10/48 patients, 20.8 %), was independently associated with higher status epilepticus severity score (STESS) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), but not tumour progression. 32/48 SE patients (66.7 %) were successfully treated with first- and second-line agents, while escalation to third-line agents was successful in 6 (12.5 %) cases.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests a link between the occurrence of SE, postoperative seizures, and drug-resistant epilepsy. Despite the dismal oncological prognosis, SE was successfully treated in 79.2 % of the cases. Higher STESS and CCI were associated with adverse SE outcomes.

Radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas: dealing with a stalemate

This article discusses the studies on radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas published between January 1, 2022, and June 30, 2022, with special reference to their molecular biology basis. The focus was on advances in radioresistance, radiosensitization and the toxicity of radiotherapy treatments. In the first half of 2022, several important advances have been made in understanding resistance mechanisms in high-grade gliomas. Furthermore, the development of several radiosensitization procedures for these deadly tumors, including studies with small molecule radiosensitizers, new fractionation protocols, and new immunostimulatory agents, has progressed in both the preclinical and clinical settings, reflecting the frantic research effort in the field. However, since 2005 our research efforts fail to produce significant improvements to treatment guidelines for high-grade gliomas. Possible reasons for this stalemate and measures to overcome it are discussed.

Novel insight into histological and molecular astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, Grade 4 by the updated WHO classification of central nervous system tumors

BACKGROUND

The latest fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the central nervous system (CNS) tumors (WHO CNS 5 classification) released in 2021 defined astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, Grade 4. However, the understanding of this subtype is still limited. We conducted this study to describe the features of astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, Grade 4 and explored the similarities and differences between histological and molecular subtypes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery from January 2011 to January 2022, classified as astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, Grade 4 were included in this study. Clinical, radiological, histopathological, molecular pathological, and survival data were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

Altogether 33 patients with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, Grade 4 were selected, including 20 with histological and 13 with molecular WHO Grade 4 astrocytoma. Tumor enhancement, intratumoral-necrosis like presentation, larger peritumoral edema, and more explicit tumor margins were frequently observed in histological WHO Grade 4 astrocytoma. Additionally, molecular WHO Grade 4 astrocytoma showed a tendency for relatively longer overall survival, while a statistical significance was not reached (47 vs. 25 months, p = 0.22). TP53, CDK6, and PIK3CA alteration was commonly observed, while PIK3R1 (p = 0.033), Notch1 (p = 0.027), and Mycn (p = 0.027) alterations may affect the overall survival of molecular WHO Grade 4 astrocytomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study scrutinized IDH-mutant, Grade 4 astrocytoma. Therefore, further classification should be considered as the prognosis varied between histological and molecular WHO Grade 4 astrocytomas. Notably, therapies aiming at PIK3R1, Notch 1, and Mycn may be beneficial.