Genetic Counseling and Diagnostics in Anorectal Malformation

1q21.1 Duplication Syndrome and Anorectal Malformations: A Literature Review and a New Case

BACKGROUND

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are a common pediatric surgical problem with an incidence of 1:1500 to 1:5000 live births. The phenotypical spectrum extends from anal stenosis to imperforate anus with or without anal fistula to persistent cloaca. They can manifest as either non-syndromic or syndromic conditions. Various environmental and genetic risk factors have been elucidated. The widespread use of genetic screening tests for the investigation of developmental disorders increased the recognition of copy number variants (CNVs) of the 1q21.1 region. Duplications have also been associated with a multitude of congenital anomalies, such as heart disease, short stature, scoliosis, urogenital, and ARMs, and they have also been found in healthy individuals. The aim of this manuscript is to contribute to the definition of the phenotype associated with 1q21.1 duplications.

CASE PRESENTATION

The present case describes a male, referred to us for an ARM, in whom array-comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) identified 1q21.1 duplication inherited from his healthy mother. No other genetic test was performed on the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose considering genetic evaluation and analysis in patients with only one congenital malformation in order to eventually make an early diagnosis and a better quality of treatments.

Anorectal malformations

Anorectal malformations (ARM) are rare congenital anomalies with an overall prevalence of 3.32 per 10,000 pregnancies. ARM describe a spectrum of anomalies of the anus and rectum ranging from a minimally displaced anal canal to a complete fusion of the anorectum, vagina and urethra with hypoplastic sphincter and pelvic floor muscle. Aberrant septation of the hindgut with anomalous cloacal membrane during weeks 6 to 9 of gestation form the developmental basis for a spectrum of anomalies defined as ARM. Although underlying specific syndromes and occasional familiar occurrence suggest genetic aetiology, most ARM are non-syndromic and their causal genetic mechanisms and non-genetic insults remain unclear. ARM is a clinical diagnosis, generally made early after birth via careful inspection of the perineum. Prenatal detection remains rare, and modern technical developments have added little to prenatal diagnostics. ARM is corrected surgically. Since its introduction in 1982, posterior sagittal anorectoplasty is the most common surgery for ARM reconstruction. Subsequent surgical adaptations focus on minimizing iatrogenic operative injury by limiting surgical invasiveness. They include laparoscopic procedures and shortening of incisions with confined dissection in open surgery. Although outcomes in patients with ARM have evolved throughout the past decades, there is urgent need for further improvements both in functional outcomes and quality of life. The importance of psychosocial experiences of affected patients is increasingly recognized. Continued research is necessary to improve prenatal detection, to elucidate genetic and epigenetic alterations and to refine optimal surgical procedures.

Potential benefits of routine cystoscopy and vaginoscopy prior to reconstructive surgery in patients with an anorectal malformation

PURPOSE

First, to assess the number of patients with anorectal malformations (ARM) in whom additional urological and/or gynecological anomalies were identified through routine screening with cysto- or vaginoscopy prior to reconstructive surgery. Second, to assess potential procedure-related complications.

METHODS

Retrospective mono-center cohort study, including all ARM patients born between January 2019 and December 2022. Routine screening consisted of cystoscopy for male patients, with the addition of vaginoscopy for female patients. Chi-square was used to compare the screening percentages over time.

RESULTS

In total, 38 patients were included, of whom 27 (71.1%) underwent cystoscopy ± vaginoscopy, without the occurrence of complications. Nine of 13 females (69.2%) underwent cysto- and vaginoscopy and 18 of 25 males (72.0%) underwent a cystoscopy. The percentage of patients that underwent these procedures improved over the 2 time periods (50.0% in 2019-2020 vs 90.0% in 2021-2022, p = 0.011). In 15 of 27 patients (55.6%) that underwent cystoscopy ± vaginoscopy, additional anomalies were found that were not identified through physical examination or US-kidney.

CONCLUSIONS

In 56% of the patients that underwent cysto- ± vaginoscopy, additional anomalies were identified that were not with imaging studies or physical examination. This study emphasizes the potential benefit of routine cysto- and vaginoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of children with ARM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Importance of Screening for Additional Anomalies in Patients with Anorectal Malformations: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

In children with anorectal malformations (ARM), additional anomalies can occur within the VACTERL-association. Routine screening is of great importance for early identification and potential treatment. However, uniformity in screening protocols is lacking and only small cohorts have been described in literature. The aim of this study was to assess and describe a unique large cohort of ARM patients who underwent VACTERL screening in the neonatal period.

METHODS

A retrospective mono-center cohort study was performed. Included were all neonates born between January 2000 and December 2020 who were diagnosed with ARM and screened for additional anomalies. Full screening consisted of x-ray and ultrasound of the spine, cardiac and renal ultrasound, and physical examination for limb deformities, esophageal atresia, and ARM. Criteria for VACTERL-classification were predefined according to the EUROCAT-definitions.

RESULTS

In total, 216 patients were included, of whom 167 (77.3%) underwent full VACTERL-screening (66% in 2000-2006 vs. 82% in 2007-2013 vs. 86% in 2014-2020). Median age at follow-up was 7.0 years (IQR 3.0-12.8). In 103/167 patients (61.7%), additional anomalies were identified. Some 35/216 patients (16.2%) fulfilled the criteria of a form of VACTERL-association. In 37/216 patients (17.1%), a genetic cause or syndrome was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of ARM patients underwent full screening to detect additional anomalies (77%), which improved over time to 86%. Yet, approximately a quarter of patients was not screened, with the potential of missing important additional anomalies that might have severe consequences in the future. Forms of VACTERL-association or genetic causes were found in 16% and 17% respectively. This study emphasizes the importance of routine screening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Significance of searching for ganglia in the terminal rectum/fistula of complex anorectal malformations: Related to defecation function

Background

The need to search for ganglia in the terminal rectum/fistula of complex anorectal malformations (ARMs) remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between ganglia absence in the terminal rectum/fistula and defecation function after anoplasty.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who received anoplasty for treating male imperforate anus with rectobulbar (RB)/rectoprostatic (RP) fistulas at a tertiary pediatric hospital was conducted with registered demographic data, imaging study results, and information on the terminal rectum/fistula specimen (excision extension and pathological findings). According to the pathological findings, patients were divided into Groups 1 (ganglia absence) and 2 (ganglia presence). Furthermore, the postoperative defecation function was evaluated using various rating scale questionnaires. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0.

Results

Of the 62 patients, 18 (29.0%) showed ganglia absence in the terminal rectum/fistula. By analyzing the imaging data, spinal anomalies and spinal cord anomalies were found in 30.6% (19/62) and 56.5% (35/62) of patients, respectively. Baseline information was comparable between Groups 1 and 2 (P > 0.05). For defecation function, there were no significant differences in Kelly scores between the two groups (4.0 ± 0.8 vs. 4.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.177), while Krickenbeck (3.7 ± 1.8 vs. 5.2 ± 1.4) and Rintala (13.7 ± 3.6 vs. 16.0 ± 2.7) scores in Group 1 were significantly lower than those in Group 2 (both P < 0.05). The overall incidence of constipation was 50% (31/62), being higher for Group 1 than Group 2 (77.5% vs. 38.6%, P = 0.002). The area under the curve of ganglia absence for predicting constipation was 0.696, with 77.8% sensitivity and 61.4% specificity.

Conclusion

Ganglia absence in the terminal rectum/fistula of male imperforate anus with RB/RP fistulas is associated with constipation after anoplasty, but it has limited predictive value for postoperative constipation. It is necessary to search for ganglia in the terminal rectum/fistula, both intraoperatively and postoperatively.

Genome-wide identification of disease-causing copy number variations in 450 individuals with anorectal malformations

Anorectal malformations (ARM) represent a spectrum of rare malformations originating from a perturbated development of the embryonic hindgut. Approximately 60% occur as a part of a defined genetic syndrome or within the spectrum of additional congenital anomalies. Rare copy number variations (CNVs) have been associated with both syndromic and non-syndromic forms. The present study represents the largest study to date to explore the contribution of CNVs to the expression of ARMs. SNP-array-based molecular karyotyping was applied in 450 individuals with ARM and 4392 healthy controls. CNVs were identified from raw intensity data using PennCNV. Overlapping CNVs between cases and controls were discarded. Remaining CNVs were filtered using a stringent filter algorithm of nine filter steps. Prioritized CNVs were confirmed using qPCR. Filtering prioritized and qPCR confirmed four microscopic chromosomal anomalies and nine submicroscopic CNVs comprising seven microdeletions (del2p13.2, del4p16.2, del7q31.33, del9p24.1, del16q12.1, del18q32, del22q11.21) and two microduplications (dup2p13.2, dup17q12) in 14 individuals (12 singletons and one affected sib-pair). Within these CNVs, based on their embryonic expression data and function, we suggest FOXK2, LPP, and SALL3 as putative candidate genes. Overall, our CNV analysis identified putative microscopic and submicroscopic chromosomal rearrangements in 3% of cases. Functional characterization and re-sequencing of suggested candidate genes is warranted.