Novelty in Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics

Overcoming personal information protection challenges involving real-world data to support public health efforts in China

In the information age, real-world data-based evidence can help extrapolate and supplement data from randomized controlled trials, which can benefit clinical trials and drug development and improve public health decision-making. However, the legitimate use of real-world data in China is limited due to concerns over patient confidentiality. The use of personal information is a core element of data governance in public health. In China's public health data governance, practical problems exist, such as balancing personal information protection and public value conflict. In 2021, China adopted the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) to provide a consistent legal framework for protecting personal information, including sensitive medical health data. Despite the PIPL offering critical legal safeguards for processing health data, further clarification is needed regarding specific issues, including the meaning of "separate consent," cross-border data transfer requirements, and exceptions for scientific research. A shift in the law and regulatory framework is necessary to advance public health research further and realize the potential benefits of combining real-world evidence and digital health while respecting privacy in the technological and demographic change era.

Broad Trends in Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to highlight innovative research and contemporary trends in the area of Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics (PHEI).

METHODS

Following a similar approach to last year's edition, a meticulous search was conducted on PubMed (with keywords including topics related to Public Health, Epidemiological Surveillance and Medical Informatics), examining a total of 2,022 scientific publications on Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics (PHEI). The resulting references were thoroughly examined by the three section editors. Subsequently, 10 papers were chosen as potential candidates for the best paper award. These selected papers were then subjected to peer-review by six external reviewers, in addition to the section editors and two chief editors of the IMIA yearbook of medical informatics. Each paper underwent a total of five reviews.

RESULTS

Out of the 539 references retrieved from PubMed, only two were deemed worthy of the best paper award, although four papers had the potential to qualify in total. The first best paper by pertains to a study about the need for a new annotation framework due to inadequacies in existing methods and resources. The second paper elucidates the use of Weibo data to monitor the health of Chinese urbanites. The correlation between air pollution and health sensing was measured via generalized additive models.

CONCLUSIONS

One of the primary findings of this edition is the dearth of studies identified for the PHEI section, which represents a significant decline compared to the previous edition. This is particularly surprising given that the post-COVID period should have led to an increased use of information and communication technology for public health issues.