1
|
Tai AMY, Kim JJ, Schmeckenbecher J, Kitchin V, Wang J, Kazemi A, Masoudi R, Fadakar H, Iorfino F, Krausz RM. Clinical decision support systems in addiction and concurrent disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract 2024. [PMID: 38979849 DOI: 10.1111/jep.14069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This review aims to synthesise the literature on the efficacy, evolution, and challenges of implementing Clincian Decision Support Systems (CDSS) in the realm of mental health, addiction, and concurrent disorders. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Searches conducted in databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science through 25 May 2023, yielded 27,344 records. After necessary exclusions, 69 records were allocated for detailed synthesis. In the examination of patient outcomes with a focus on metrics such as therapeutic efficacy, patient satisfaction, and treatment acceptance, meta-analytic techniques were employed to synthesise data from randomised controlled trials. RESULTS A total of 69 studies were included, revealing a shift from knowledge-based models pre-2017 to a rise in data-driven models post-2017. The majority of models were found to be in Stage 2 or 4 of maturity. The meta-analysis showed an effect size of -0.11 for addiction-related outcomes and a stronger effect size of -0.50 for patient satisfaction and acceptance of CDSS. DISCUSSION The results indicate a shift from knowledge-based to data-driven CDSS approaches, aligned with advances in machine learning and big data. Although the immediate impact on addiction outcomes is modest, higher patient satisfaction suggests promise for wider CDSS use. Identified challenges include alert fatigue and opaque AI models. CONCLUSION CDSS shows promise in mental health and addiction treatment but requires a nuanced approach for effective and ethical implementation. The results emphasise the need for continued research to ensure optimised and equitable use in healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Man Yeung Tai
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jane J Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jim Schmeckenbecher
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Vanessa Kitchin
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Johnston Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alireza Kazemi
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Raha Masoudi
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hasti Fadakar
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Frank Iorfino
- Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Reinhard Michael Krausz
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Siebenmorgen JP, Goree JH, Siegel ER, Norman SE, Stronach BM, Stambough JB, Mears SC. Hospital-Wide Adherence to Postsurgical Opioid Prescribing Guidelines: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Surg Res 2024; 296:571-580. [PMID: 38340491 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lowering opioid prescription doses and quantity decreases the risk of chronic opioid usage. A tool was inserted into the brief operative note for the surgeon to assess the severity of pain associated with the procedure. We studied surgeon adherence to current opioid-prescribing recommendations. METHODS Retrospective cohort study with 5486 patients were included in the study population. Each patient's prescription was scored yes or no for adherence on total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and days prescribed with the selection in the brief operative note. The entire study population was tested for an increase from the null-hypothesis "benchmark" value of 75% using a one-sided exact binomial test of a single proportion with P < 0.05. This procedure was repeated for subgroups, with P < 0.01. RESULTS Adherence to guidelines was higher than the 75% benchmark for "total MMEs prescribed" (79.5%; P < 0.001), but lower for "number of days prescribed" (63.5%; P > 0.999). Surgeries with severe predicted pain showed the highest adherence toward total MMEs prescribed at 87.1%, followed by moderate (80.5%) and mild (74.5%). Severe cases also showed the highest adherence in number of days prescribed (92.4%). Adherence to total MMEs prescribed was highest among attending physicians (88.1%) and lowest among residents/fellows (76.6%). CONCLUSIONS Adherence to current guidelines was 79.5% for MMEs prescribed but only 63.5% for days prescribed. Compliance with guidelines was better for severe procedures than mild or moderate. Differences were seen across surgical departments. While an improvement from previous reports, further improvement is needed to reduce the number of days of opioids prescribed and increase compliance with recommended guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob P Siebenmorgen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Johnathan H Goree
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Eric R Siegel
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Sarah E Norman
- The College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Benjamin M Stronach
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Jeffrey B Stambough
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Simon C Mears
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seymour RB, Wally MK, Hsu JR. Impact of clinical decision support on controlled substance prescribing. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:234. [PMID: 37864226 PMCID: PMC10588193 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02314-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prescription drug overdose and misuse has reached alarming numbers. A persistent problem in clinical care is lack of easy, immediate access to all relevant information at the actionable time. Prescribers must digest an overwhelming amount of information from each patient's record as well as remain up-to-date with current evidence to provide optimal care. This study aimed to describe prescriber response to a prospective clinical decision support intervention designed to identify patients at risk of adverse events associated with misuse of prescription opioids/benzodiazepines and promote adherence to clinical practice guidelines. METHODS This study was conducted at a large multi-center healthcare system, using data from the electronic health record. A prospective observational study was performed as clinical decision support (CDS) interventions were sequentially launched (January 2016-July 2019). All data were captured from the medical record prospectively via the CDS tools implemented. A consecutive series of all patient encounters including an opioid/benzodiazepine prescription were included in this study (n = 61,124,172 encounters; n = 674,785 patients). Physician response to the CDS interventions was the primary outcome, and it was assessed over time using control charts. RESULTS An alert was triggered in 23.5% of encounters with a prescription (n = 555,626). The prescriber decision was influenced in 18.1% of these encounters (n = 100,301). As the number of risk factors increased, the rate of decision being influenced also increased (p = 0.0001). The effect of the alert differed by drug, risk factor, specialty, and facility. CONCLUSION The delivery of evidence-based, patient-specific information had an influence on the final prescription in nearly 1 in 5 encounters. Our intervention was sustained with minimal prescriber fatigue over many years in a large and diverse health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel B Seymour
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA.
- Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, 2001 Vail Avenue, 6th floor, Charlotte, NC, 28207, USA.
| | - Meghan K Wally
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA
| | - Joseph R Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wally MK, Thompson ME, Odum S, Kazemi DM, Hsu JR, Seymour RB. Opioid Prescribing for Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: Trends over Time and Implementation of Safe Opioid-Prescribing Practices. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14:961-972. [PMID: 38057261 PMCID: PMC10700149 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed (1) to determine the impact of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool on rate of opioid prescribing and opioid dose for patients with chronic musculoskeletal conditions and (2) to identify prescriber and facility characteristics associated with adherence to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain in this population.We conducted an interrupted time series analysis to assess trends in percentage of patients from 2016 to 2020, receiving an opioid and the average opioid dose, as well as the change associated with implementation of the CDS toolkit. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the association between prescriber and facility characteristics and safe opioid-prescribing practices. METHODS We assessed the impact of the CDS intervention on percent of patients receiving an opioid and average opioid dose (morphine milligram equivalents). We operationalized safe opioid prescribing as a composite score of several behaviors (i.e., prescribing naloxone, initiating a pain agreement, prescribing <90 MME, avoiding extended-release prescriptions for opioid-naïve patients, and avoiding coprescribing opioids and benzodiazepines) and used a hierarchical linear regression model to assess associations between prescriber and facility characteristics and safe opioid prescribing. RESULTS This CDS intervention had a modest but statistically significant 1.6% reduction on the percent of patients (n = 1,290,746) receiving an opioid (mean: 15% preintervention; 10% postintervention). The average dose of opioid prescriptions did not significantly change. Advanced practice providers and prescribers with higher percentages of patients aged 18 to 64 exhibited safer opioid prescribing, while prescribers with higher percentages of white patients and larger numbers of patients on opioids exhibited less safe opioid prescribing. CONCLUSION A CDS intervention was associated with a small improvement in percent of patients receiving an opioid, but not on average dose. Clinicians are not prescribing opioids for chronic musculoskeletal conditions frequently, when they do, they are generally adhering to guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan K. Wally
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
| | - Michael E. Thompson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
| | - Susan Odum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
| | - Donna M. Kazemi
- School of Nursing, College of Health and Human Services, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
| | - Joseph R. Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
| | - Rachel B. Seymour
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jennings LK, Ward R, Pekar E, Szwast E, Sox L, Hying J, Mccauley J, Obeid JS, Lenert LA. The effectiveness of a noninterruptive alert to increase prescription of take-home naloxone in emergency departments. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 30:683-691. [PMID: 36718091 PMCID: PMC10018256 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Opioid-related overdose (OD) deaths continue to increase. Take-home naloxone (THN), after treatment for an OD in an emergency department (ED), is a recommended but under-utilized practice. To promote THN prescription, we developed a noninterruptive decision support intervention that combined a detailed OD documentation template with a reminder to use the template that is automatically inserted into a provider's note by decision rules. We studied the impact of the combined intervention on THN prescribing in a longitudinal observational study. METHODS ED encounters involving an OD were reviewed before and after implementation of the reminder embedded in the physicians' note to use an advanced OD documentation template for changes in: (1) use of the template and (2) prescription of THN. Chi square tests and interrupted time series analyses were used to assess the impact. Usability and satisfaction were measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the Net Promoter Score. RESULTS In 736 OD cases defined by International Classification of Disease version 10 diagnosis codes (247 prereminder and 489 postreminder), the documentation template was used in 0.0% and 21.3%, respectively (P < .0001). The sensitivity and specificity of the reminder for OD cases were 95.9% and 99.8%, respectively. Use of the documentation template led to twice the rate of prescribing of THN (25.7% vs 50.0%, P < .001). Of 19 providers responding to the survey, 74% of SUS responses were in the good-to-excellent range and 53% of providers were Net Promoters. CONCLUSIONS A noninterruptive decision support intervention was associated with higher THN prescribing in a pre-post study across a multiinstitution health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey K Jennings
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ralph Ward
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ekaterina Pekar
- Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth Szwast
- Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Luke Sox
- Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Joseph Hying
- Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jenna Mccauley
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Addiction Sciences Division, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jihad S Obeid
- Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Leslie A Lenert
- Corresponding Author: Leslie A. Lenert, MD, Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 22 West Edge Suite 13, Charleston, SC 29425, USA;
| |
Collapse
|