Clinical usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for non-ampullary duodenal tumors

Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors now: endoscopic diagnosis and therapy

With the recent increase in the frequency of duodenal tumor detection, significant progress has been made in endoscopic diagnosis and treatment. Although the first guidelines were issued in Japan, patient treatment varies widely among institutions. There is a need for improving the quality of endoscopic diagnosis and more curative and safer treatments. Biopsy is the standard diagnostic method; however, the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic biopsy is not so high. Therefore, the differentiation of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors from non-neoplastic lesions is being developed. The incidence of lymph node and distant metastases of duodenal epithelial tumors is extremely rare in intramucosal carcinomas, and they are considered good candidates for endoscopic treatment if the technical difficulties can be resolved. Adverse events associated with endoscopic treatment are greatly reduced at advanced facilities through novel resection and closure methods, and further improvements are expected in the future. Clarifying the risk of metastatic recurrence may lead to the development of more appropriate treatments and curative resection criteria.

Advanced diagnostic endoscopy in the upper gastrointestinal tract: Review of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society core sessions

We held four upper gastrointestinal tract advanced diagnostic endoscopy sessions from the 89th to the 92nd Congress of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. The most common region addressed was the stomach in 25 presentations, followed by the esophagus in 23, duodenum in five, and other in one. Looking at techniques discussed, the most common image enhancement method discussed was narrowband imaging in 29 presentations, blue laser imaging, and linked color imaging (LCI) in 10 each, dual red imaging in three, and autofluorescence imaging in one. Furthermore, there were presentations of new techniques such as M-Chromo-LCI and acetic acid-indigo carmine mixture LCI. There were also six presentations regarding probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, and one of endocytoscopy techniques. We also saw presentations of images of gastric subepithelial tumors within the submucosa, 3D endoscopy, the development of computer-aided detection systems for early cancers, and fluorescent imaging.

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: A review

The surface of the small bowel mucosa is covered more than any other section of the digestive canal; however, the overall prevalence of small bowel tumors of the whole gastrointestinal tract is evidently low. Owing to the improvement in endoscopic techniques, the prevalence of small bowel tumors has increased across multiple countries, which is mainly due to an increase in duodenal tumors. Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) are defined as tumors originating from the non-ampullary region in the duodenum that share similarities and discrepancies with their gastric and colorectal counterparts in the pathogenesis and clinicopathologic characteristics. To date, white light endoscopy (WLE) remains the cornerstone of endoscopic diagnosis for SNADETs. Besides, narrow-band imaging (NBI) techniques and magnifying endoscopy (ME) have been widely used in the clinic and endorsed by multiple guidelines and consensuses for SNADETs' evaluation. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), endocytoscopy (ECS), and artificial intelligence (AI) are also up-and-coming methods, showing an exceptional value in the diagnosis of SNADETs. Similar to the endoscopic treatment for colorectal polyps, the choices for SNADETs mainly include cold snare polypectomy (CSP), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS). However, owing to the narrow lumen, rich vascularity, weak muscle layer, abundant Brunner's gland, and the hardship of endoscope control, the duodenum ranks as one of the most dangerous operating areas in the digestive tract. Therefore, endoscopists must anticipate the difficulties in endoscopic maneuverability, remain aware of the increased risk of complications, and then select the appropriate treatment according to the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

A narrative review: narrow-band imaging endoscopic classifications

Background and Objective

With the development of endoscopic techniques, narrow-band imaging (NBI) has been widely used in the diagnosis of various types of diseases. NBI can detect mucosal lesions at an early stage and different classification strategies have been established to help clinicians in disease diagnosis. However, there is currently no consensus for the classification criteria. This report summarizes the current classifications of diseases using NBI, so as to provide a comprehensive understanding of the various manifestations of mucosal lesions under NBI, and to promote the development of more practical NBI classifications.

Methods

The PubMed database was searched for English language articles published between January 1994 and November 2021 using the keywords 'narrow band imaging', 'NBI', and 'classification'.

Key Content and Findings

We systematically summarized the NBI classifications and manifestations of different diseases. The morphology of the mucosa and vessels was used as the basis of most classifications. These classifications are mainly helpful to distinguish benign and malignant tumors and to detect early neoplastic lesions.

Conclusions

This review summarized existing NBI classifications for different systems. These classifications will be updated as the understanding of diseases increases and new optical techniques become available to better assist doctors in making clinical decisions.

Current status and perspectives for endoscopic diagnosis of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

In recent years, there have been significant advances in the endoscopic resection (ER) procedures of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). A preoperative endoscopic diagnosis is thus deemed necessary in determining the indication for subsequent ER. For the histologic and endoscopic diagnosis of SNADETs, understanding the mucin phenotype is inevitable. Recently, two diagnostic algorithms for the differential diagnosis of SNADETs from nonneoplastic lesions under magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging have been proposed. In addition, various endoscopic approaches have been proposed to differentiate low- and high-grade adenomas/carcinomas, including white light endoscopy, magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy, and endocytoscopy. These methods, however, have not been standardized with respect to the classification of their findings and the validation of their diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, there are still concerns with respect to the histologic criteria required to establish a SNADETs diagnosis. Standardization in the histologic and endoscopic diagnosis of SNADETs is needed.

Clinical practice guidelines for duodenal cancer 2021

Duodenal cancer is considered to be a small intestinal carcinoma in terms of clinicopathology. In Japan, there are no established treatment guidelines based on sufficient scientific evidence; therefore, in daily clinical practice, treatment is based on the experience of individual physicians. However, with advances in diagnostic modalities, it is anticipated that opportunities for its detection will increase in future. We developed guidelines for duodenal cancer because this disease is considered to have a high medical need from both healthcare providers and patients for appropriate management. These guidelines were developed for use in actual clinical practice for patients suspected of having non-ampullary duodenal epithelial malignancy and for patients diagnosed with non-ampullary duodenal epithelial malignancy. In this study, a practice algorithm was developed in accordance with the Minds Practice Guideline Development Manual 2017, and Clinical Questions were set for each area of epidemiology and diagnosis, endoscopic treatment, surgical treatment, and chemotherapy. A draft recommendation was developed through a literature search and systematic review, followed by a vote on the recommendations. We made decisions based on actual clinical practice such that the level of evidence would not be the sole determinant of the recommendation. This guideline is the most standard guideline as of the time of preparation. It is important to decide how to handle each case in consultation with patients and their family, the treating physician, and other medical personnel, considering the actual situation at the facility (and the characteristics of the patient).

Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with acetic acid and narrow-band imaging for the diagnosis of duodenal neoplasms: proposal of a diagnostic algorithm

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to clarify the features of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) on magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) and magnifying endoscopy with acetic acid and narrow-band imaging (M-AANBI), and evaluate the efficacy of M-NBI/M-AANBI to distinguish high-grade adenomas or adenocarcinomas (HGA/AC) from low-grade adenomas (LGA).

METHODS

Clinicopathological data on 62 SNADETs in 58 patients who underwent preoperative M-NBI/M-AANBI and endoscopic resection were retrospectively reviewed. The pathological results were classified into two categories, LGA and HGA/AC. We evaluated microvascular patterns (MVPs) and microsurface patterns (MSPs) observed by M-NBI and MSPs observed by M-AANBI for characterizing LGA and HGA/AC. The kappa value was calculated to assess the interobserver and intraobserver agreements of evaluation of M-AANBI images.

RESULTS

Pathologically, 38 lesions (61.3%) were LGA and 24 lesions (38.7%) were HGA/AC. HGA/AC tended to have irregular MVP and/or MSP on M-NBI. M-NBI diagnostic performance to distinguish HGA/AC from LGA showed 62.5% sensitivity, 68.4% specificity, and 66.1% accuracy. SNADETs had irregular MSP on M-AANBI. Three irregularity grades (iG) of MSP were observed by M-AANBI as follows: iG1, mild; iG2, moderate; iG3, significant. HGA/AC lesions had a significantly higher rate of iG3 than LGA lesions (p < 0.001). The iG2 was associated with HGA/AC in elevated lesions and LGA in depressed lesions. The diagnostic performance of M-AANBI was as follows: 95.8% sensitivity, 97.4% specificity, and 96.8% accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy of M-AANBI was significantly higher than that of M-NBI (p < 0.001). The kappa value for interobserver agreement on the diagnosis and irregularity grading of M-AANBI images was 0.742 and 0.719, respectively. These data indicate substantial interobserver agreement. Based on the above-mentioned results, we developed a M-AANBI diagnostic algorithm for SNADETs.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic algorithm for SNADETs using M-AANBI may be useful for differentiating between LGA and HGA/AC.

Magnified endoscopy with texture and color enhanced imaging with indigo carmine for superficial nonampullary duodenal tumor: a pilot study

This pilot study aimed to investigate the utility of texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) with magnified endoscopy (ME) for the preoperative diagnosis of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). We prospectively evaluated 12 SNADETs. The visibility for ME-TXI, ME with indigo carmine (ICME)—white-light imaging (WLI), ICME-TXI compared to ME-NBI (narrow-band imaging) was scored (+ 2 to − 2 ME-NBI was set as score 0) by 3 experts. Scores + 2 and + 1 were defined as improved visibility. The intra-observer and interobserver agreement for improved visibility of surface structure (SS) was evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) for Vienna Classification (VCL) C4/5 associated with the preoperative diagnosis of ICME-TXI were analyzed. The SS visibility score of ICME-TXI was significantly higher than that of ME-NBI, ME-TXI, and ICME-WLI (P < 0.001 respectively). The kappa coefficients of reliability for intra-observer and interobserver agreement for the SS visibility improvement with ICME-TXI were 0.96, 1.00, 1.00 and 0.70, 0.96, 0.96 respectively. All endoscopists preferred ICME-TXI for visualizing SS mostly for all lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV (%) of ICME-TXI for VCL C4/5 were 80, 66.7, and 63.2, respectively. ICME-TXI facilitates the visibility of the SS of SNADETs and may contribute to their preoperative diagnosis.

Endocytoscopy Is Useful for the Diagnosis of Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) are lacking. The aim of this study was to explore the usefulness of endocytoscopy (ECS) in the duodenum.

METHODS

A total of 77 ECS images stained by methylene blue and 58 images with double staining of methylene blue and crystal violet were obtained from 20 patients. Images were classified into 3 grades based on nuclear and villi atypia: EC A, B, and C. Diagnostic performance of ECS classification to predict histology and interobserver agreement was evaluated. The performance was compared between staining methods and ×520 or ×936 zoom.

RESULTS

With methylene blue staining, high rates of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) over 90% were achieved for tumor and nontumor diagnosis as assessed by EC A versus EC B. High rates of accuracy, sensitivity, PPV, and negative predictive value over 90% were achieved for the differentiation between the diagnosis of the Vienna category 3 and 4/5 as assessed by EC B versus C. The accuracy rate of interpreting ECS images with ×936 zoom among 10 endoscopists was 82%, and the interobserver agreement rate was 0.803 (Kendall's coefficient of concordance). In the ×936 zoom group, methylene blue staining was significantly associated with higher accuracy rate (odds ratio 1.76 [1.06-2.92], p value 0.0297). No benefit was observed by double staining.

CONCLUSIONS

ECS diagnosis with methylene blue provides a high accuracy rate and good interobserver agreement to predict histology of SNADETs.

Endoscopic and Clinicopathological Features of Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Tumor Based on the Mucin Phenotypes

AIMS

We aimed to clarify the endoscopic/clinicopathological features of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) based on their mucin phenotypes.

METHODS

We analyzed 62 SNADET lesions and classified them based on mucin phenotypic expression. Endoscopic and clinicopathological findings were compared according to mucin phenotypes.

RESULTS

Eleven lesions had the gastric phenotype (GP) and 43 lesions had the intestinal phenotype (IP). All GP lesions were located in the first portion of the duodenum, while most IP lesions (72.1%) were located in the second portion (p < 0.01). Tumor size was significantly larger in the GP than in the IP group (14.4 mm vs. 10.2 mm, p < 0.05). Reddish color (72.7% in GP vs. 37.2% in IP, p < 0.05), type 0-I (72.7% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.01), lobular/granular pattern (81.8% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.01), and category 4/5 in Vienna classification (81.8% vs. 30.2%, p < 0.01) were observed significantly more often in the GP than in the IP group. Regarding findings of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI), white opaque substance (22.2% in GP vs. 89.7% in IP, p < 0.01) and light blue crest (0% vs. 43.6%, p < 0.05) were significantly less frequently observed in the GP group. Oval-shaped marginal epithelium (66.7% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.01), dense pattern (55.6% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.01), and dilatation of the intervening part (100% vs. 12.8%, p < 0.01) were more frequently observed in the GP group.

CONCLUSIONS

SNADETs showed distinct endoscopic/clinicopathological features according to the mucin phenotype. Tumor location, coloration, macroscopic type, and endoscopic findings including M-NBI are useful to distinguish the mucin phenotypes of SNADETs.

Efficacy of Magnifying Narrow Band Imaging with Acetic Acid Spray in Diagnosing Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of magnifying narrow band imaging with acetic acid spray (MA-NBI) in differentiating category 4/5 lesions from category 3 lesions of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) as per Vienna Classification and to compare the diagnostic performances of both MA-NBI and magnifying narrow band imaging (M-NBI).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 60 resected SNADETs (31 category 3 lesions and 29 category 4/5 lesions) in 60 patients who underwent M-NBI and MA-NBI preoperatively. We evaluated vascular and surface patterns using M-NBI and MA-NBI for characterizing category 3 and 4/5 lesions. The surface pattern was classified as tubular, villous, or mix structure using MA-NBI. In addition, lesions with disorganized and unclear structures with irregular margins that can be clearly recognized by MA-NBI were defined as irregular surface structures.

RESULTS

For MA-NBI, category 4/5 lesions had a significantly higher mix structure rate and higher irregular surface structure rate than category 3 lesions (62 vs. 16%, p < 0.001, and 86 vs. 19%, p < 0.001, respectively). The diagnostic accuracy of MA-NBI using mix and irregular surface structures for identifying category 4/5 lesions was as follows: sensitivity, 62/86%; specificity, 84/77%; positive predictive value, 78/78%; negative predictive value, 70/86%; and accuracy, 73/82%. The diagnostic accuracy of MA-NBI using irregular surface structure was significantly higher than that of M-NBI (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MA-NBI may be useful in differentiating between category 3 and category 4/5 lesions of SNADETs.

Current status of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

Though superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) have been traditionally considered rare, there is a growing detection under the development and widespread of endoscopic techniques in recent times. Many case studies have revealed early manifestations of lesions through advanced endoscopic technology, however, because of the low incidence of duodenal tumors and challenges in diagnosing, the preoperative diagnosis criteria have not been established so far. In spite of this, recently the increasing detection rate of early duodenal epithelial lesions enhances the demand for minimally invasive treatment as well. The most suitable therapeutic endoscopic modality to remove duodenal lesions should be selected according to the size, location and histological invasive depth of duodenal lesions. Nevertheless, due to the special anatomical structure of the duodenum, the incidence of complications is much higher than in any other part of the digestive tract. To prevent these adverse events prophylactically, a few novel strategies have been applied effectively after resection. This review describes the current status of preoperative endoscopic diagnosis and endoscopic resection approaches, as well as countermeasures for avoiding procedure-related complications.

Endoscopic management of superficial nonampullary duodenal tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

1: ESGE recommends that all duodenal adenomas should be considered for endoscopic resection as progression to invasive carcinoma is highly likely.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2: ESGE recommends performance of a colonoscopy, if that has not yet been done, in cases of duodenal adenoma.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends the use of the cap-assisted method when the location of the minor and/or major papilla and their relationship to a duodenal adenoma is not clearly established during forward-viewing endoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends the routine use of a side-viewing endoscope when a laterally spreading adenoma with extension to the minor and/or major papilla is suspected.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5: ESGE suggests cold snare polypectomy for small (< 6 mm in size) nonmalignant duodenal adenomas.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6: ESGE recommends endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as the first-line endoscopic resection technique for nonmalignant large nonampullary duodenal adenomas.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7: ESGE recommends that endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for duodenal adenomas is an effective resection technique only in expert hands.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends using techniques that minimize adverse events such as immediate or delayed bleeding or perforation. These may include piecemeal resection, defect closure techniques, noncontact hemostasis, and other emerging techniques, and these should be considered on a case-by-case basis.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 9: ESGE recommends endoscopic surveillance 3 months after the index treatment. In cases of no recurrence, a further follow-up endoscopy should be done 1 year later. Thereafter, surveillance intervals should be adapted to the lesion site, en bloc resection status, and initial histological result. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

White light and/or magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A reliable optical diagnosis of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) to guide optimal treatment strategy is lacking. The aim of this study was to simulate the treatment outcomes based on optical diagnosis using white light imaging (WLI) or magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (MNBI) and to evaluate the method to extract optimal lesions suitable for cold snare polypectomy (CSP) or not.

METHODS

We created a decision tree model using WLI and MNBI diagnosis for ideal treatment for SNADETs. Optical diagnoses of Vienna category 3 lesions (C3), category 4/5 (C4/5) were defined based on the WLI scoring system or the MNBI pattern diagnosis. Ideal treatments were CSP for C3 < 10mm, and endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgery for lesions ≥10mm or C4/5. Ideal treatment results based on optical diagnosis were analyzed according to actual pathological results.

RESULTS

A total of 218 lesions with pre-operative diagnosis of SNADETs were included for analysis. Percentage of ideal treatment for C3 < 10mm based on WLI or MNBI or both was 88%, 83% and 97%. When WLI and MNBI diagnoses predicted the same histology, the specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy were significantly higher than those of WLI or MNBI alone (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

A decision tree model using lesion diameter, WLI scoring and MNBI pattern diagnosis is hypothetically useful to select ideal lesions for CSP among SNADETs. Optical diagnosis using both WLI and MNBI is more useful than WLI or MNBI alone.

Does previous biopsy lead to cancer overdiagnosis of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors?

Background and study aims  We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) in superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) regarding the absence or presence of biopsy before M-NBI diagnosis. Patients and methods  Clinicopathological data were retrospectively reviewed for 99 SNADETs from 99 patients who underwent endoscopic resection. The 99 tumors were divided into the non-biopsy group (32 lesions not undergoing biopsy before M-NBI examination) and the biopsy group (67 lesions undergoing biopsy before M-NBI examination). We investigated the correlation between the M-NBI diagnosis and the histopathological diagnosis of the SNADETs in both groups. Results  According to the modified revised Vienna classification, 31 tumors were classified as category 3 (C3) (low-grade adenoma) and 68 as category 4/5 (C4/5) (high-grade adenoma/cancer). The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of preoperative M-NBI diagnoses in the non-biopsy group vs the biopsy group were 88 % (95 % confidence interval: 71.0 - 96.5) vs 66 % (51.5 - 75.5), P  = 0.02; 95 % (77.2 - 99.9) vs 89 % (76.4 - 96.4), P  = 0.39; and 70 % (34.8 - 93.3) vs 14 % (3.0 - 36.3), P  < 0.01, respectively. Notably, in the biopsy group, the specificity of M-NBI in SNADETs was low at only 14 % because we over-diagnosed most C3 lesions as C4/5. M-NBI findings might have been compromised by the previous biopsy procedure itself. Conclusions  In the non-biopsy group, the accuracy of M-NBI in SNADETs was excellent in distinguishing C4/5 lesions from C3. The M-NBI findings in SNADETs should be evaluated while carefully considering the influence of a previous biopsy.

NBI utility in oncologic surgery: An organ by organ review

The main aims of the oncologic surgeon should be an early tumor diagnosis, complete surgical resection, and a careful post-treatment follow-up to ensure a prompt diagnosis of recurrence. Radiologic and endoscopic methods have been traditionally used for these purposes, but their accuracy might sometimes be suboptimal. Technological improvements could help the clinician during the diagnostic and therapeutic management of tumors. Narrow band imaging (NBI) belongs to optical image techniques, and uses light characteristics to enhance tissue vascularization. Because neoangiogenesis is a fundamental step during carcinogenesis, NBI could be useful in the diagnostic and therapeutic workup of tumors. Since its introduction in 2001, NBI use has rapidly spread in different oncologic specialties with clear advantages. There is an active interest in this topic as demonstrated by the thriving literature. It is unavoidable for clinicians to gain in-depth knowledge about the application of NBI to their specific field, losing the overall view on the topic. However, by looking at other fields of application, clinicians could find ideas to improve NBI use in their own specialty. The aim of this review is to summarize the existing literature on NBI use in oncology, with the aim of providing the state of the art: we present an overview on NBI fields of application, results, and possible future improvements in the different specialties.

Diagnostic algorithm of magnifying endoscopy with crystal violet staining for non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

OBJECTIVES

Little is known about the usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with crystal violet staining (ME-CV) for the diagnosis of duodenal tumors. We assessed the ability of ME-CV to distinguish Vienna classification (VCL) category 4/5 (C4/5) from category 3 (C3) non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs).

METHODS

A total of 76 NADETs were studied. We retrospectively analyzed the diagnostic values of the white light endoscopy (WLE) scoring system and the ME-CV algorithm with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and three endoscopists calculated the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the curve (AUC) of each. The diagnostic values were tested among NADETs overall and among subgroups of tumors with gastric, gastrointestinal or intestinal mucin phenotypes. Inter-observer agreement of the diagnostic results was also calculated.

RESULTS

According to the VCL, 54 lesions (71.1%) were regarded as C3 and 22 lesions (28.9%) as C4/5. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of ME-CV were higher than those of the WLE scoring system (63.6 vs 54.5, 85.2 vs 75.9, 78.9 vs 69.7, 0.744 vs 0.652, respectively). Inter-observer agreements of the WLE scoring system and ME-CV were both moderate (kappa 0.45 and 0.41). ME-CV had higher sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC than those of the WLE scoring system among the gastric and intestinal phenotypes of NADETs.

CONCLUSIONS

ME-CV is appropriate for the diagnosis of C4/5 and C3 NADETs.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors

Background and study aims  Because superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) are relatively rare, studies evaluating the outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) for SNADETs are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical validity of ER for SNADETs. Patients and methods  The study participants included 163 consecutive patients (108 men; mean age, 61.5 ± 11.3 years) with 171 SNADETs, excluding patients with familial adenomatous polyposis resected by ER, at Hiroshima University Hospital between May 2005 and September 2016. Clinicopathological features and the outcomes of ER for 171 cases were retrospectively analyzed. Additionally, the prognosis of 135 patients with more than 12 months' follow-up was analyzed. Results  Mean diameter of SNADETs was 10.7 ± 7.2 mm. Most of the SNADET cases were classified as category 3 (71 %, 121/171), but some were category 5 (2 %, 3/171). En bloc resection rates were 93 % (146/157), 100 % (7/7), and 86 % (6/7) in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), polypectomy, and in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) cases, respectively. Complete resection rates were 90 % (141/157), 100 % (7/7), and 71 % (5/7) in EMR, polypectomy, and ESD cases, respectively. Emergency surgery was performed in two patients with intraoperative perforation and in two with delayed perforation without artificial ulcer bed closure after ER. Since endoscopic closure of ulcer by clipping was performed, delayed perforation has not occurred. Local recurrence occurred in 1.2 %, but no metastasis to lymph nodes or other organs occurred after ER. No patient died of primary SNADETs. Conclusion  Our data supported the clinical validity of ER for SNADETs. However, delayed perforation should be given much attention.

Magnified endoscopy with narrow-band imaging for the differential diagnosis of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Differentiation of low-grade adenoma (Vienna category 3, C3) and high-grade adenoma/carcinoma (C4/5) among superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) using magnified endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (MNBI) is not established. The aim of this study is to clarify the diagnostic ability of MNBI to differentiate between C3 and C4/5 among SNADETs.

METHODS

A total of 585 MNBI images taken from 156 SNADETs were evaluated in a test and validation phase. In the test phase, MNBI patterns were extracted based on the combination of surface structure and vasculature. Comparison between MNBI patterns and histology was performed to establish diagnostic criteria to differentiate between C3 and C4/5. In the validation phase, the accuracy and interobserver agreement of the diagnostic criteria were assessed.

RESULTS

Four MNBI patterns (network, disappeared, white opaque substance and intrastructural vessels) with distinctive histological features were selected. The median number of MNBI patterns observed among C3 and C4/5 differed with significance (1 vs 2, p < .01). The pattern of disappeared was suggestive of C4/5. Diagnosis of C4/5 by using the criteria of 2 or more MNBI patterns or presence of disappeared pattern revealed a sensitivity of 76%, specificity of 63% and accuracy of 72%. Interobserver agreement of recognizing MNBI patterns was moderate (kappa 0.59).

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis based on MNBI patterns is useful to differentiate between C3 and C4/5 lesions among SNADETs.

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors

The diagnostic and treatment guidelines of superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors have not been standardized due to their low prevalence. Previous reports suggested that a superficial adenocarcinoma (SAC) should be treated via local resection because of its low risk of lymph node metastasis, whereas a high-grade adenoma (HGA) should be resected because of its high risk of progression to adenocarcinoma. Therefore, pretreatment diagnosis of SAC or HGA is important to determine the appropriate treatment strategy. There are certain endoscopic features known to be associated with SAC or HGA, and current practice prioritizes the endoscopic and biopsy diagnosis of these conditions. Surgical treatment of these duodenal lesions is often related to high risk of morbidity, and therefore endoscopic resection has become increasingly common in recent years. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are the commonly performed endoscopic resection methods. EMR is preferred due to its lower risk of adverse events; however, it has a higher risk of recurrence than ESD. Recently, a new and safer endoscopic procedure that reduces adverse events from EMR or ESD has been reported.

Clinicopathological Features and Magnifying Chromoendoscopic Findings of Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed to investigate an association between clinicopathological features, including immunohistochemical mucin phenotypes, and magnifying chromoendoscopic findings with crystal violet staining (ME-CV) in non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs).

METHODS

A total of 55 patients with NADET were divided into 3 groups by mucin phenotype: intestinal, gastrointestinal, or gastric. ME-CV findings were classified into 4 patterns: convoluted, leaf-like, reticular/sulciolar, and pinecone. The clinicopathological features and ME-CV findings were compared among the mucin phenotypes.

RESULTS

Tumors of the gastric type were located in the duodenal bulb (p < 0.001), and contained pyloric gland adenoma (p < 0.001) more frequently than the other types. White-light endoscopy indicated that milk-white mucosa was less frequent in tumors of the gastric type than in those of the gastrointestinal type (p = 0.006) and the intestinal type (p < 0.001). ME-CV findings were significantly different between the gastric type and the other type (p = 0.028). Totally, 5 of 8 tumors of the gastric type manifested a pinecone pattern, 4 of which were compatible with pyloric gland adenoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic findings of NADETs differ according to mucin phenotype. A pinecone pattern under ME-CV may be characteristic of NADETs of the gastric type, especially pyloric gland adenoma.