Preoperative biliary drainage by plastic or self-expandable metal stents in patients with periampullary tumors: results of a randomized clinical study

Outcomes of 6-mm diameter fully covered self-expandable metal stents for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer

Background

10-mm self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are commonly used for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer. However, smaller diameter SEMSs have attracted attention with the attempt to reduce stent-related adverse events (AEs).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) placement from April 2015 to May 2023. The primary outcome was stent-related non-event rate (NER), which was defined as the rate of completion of surgery without developing any preoperative events (recurrent biliary obstruction [RBO] or stent-related AEs). Secondary outcomes included stent-related AEs, causes of RBO, and cumulative incidence of RBO. Risk factors for pancreatitis, RBO, and stent migration were also examined.

Results

A total of 76 patients were included (6-mm group: 23; 10-mm group: 53). Stent-related NER (57% vs. 64%, p = 0.610), stent-related AEs (4% vs. 15%, p = 0.263), overall RBO rates (39% vs. 23%, p = 0.168), cumulative incidence of RBO (hazard ratio, 2.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-5.25; p = 0.065) were not significantly different between the two groups. Tumor involvement of the pancreatic duct was identified as a risk-reducing factor for pancreatitis, while an FCSEMS diameter of 6 mm was not identified as a risk factor for RBO and stent migration.

Conclusions

Stent-related NER was not significantly affected by FCSEMS diameter. Further studies are needed to confirm the usefulness of 6-mm diameter FCSEMS for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Fully covered versus partially covered self-expandable metal stents for palliation of distal malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are standardly used for distal malignant biliary obstruction (dMBO). Although data suggest that covered versus uncovered SEMSs increase the time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO), no data are available for fully covered (FC) versus partially covered (PC) designs.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were screened up to January 2023 for studies concerning dMBO treated by an FC- or PC-SEMS and describing adverse events (AEs), recurrences, or TRBO for specific design subpopulations. Pooled proportions or means were calculated using a random-effects model. Several subanalyses were preplanned, including a subanalysis restricted to prospective studies and unresectable diseases. Heterogeneity and publication bias were explored. Standardized differences (d-values) were calculated between groups.

RESULTS

From 1290 records, 62 studies (3327 using FC-SEMSs and 2322 using PC-SEMSs) were included. FC- versus PC-SEMSs showed negligible differences in the rate of total AEs (12% vs 9.9%) and all specific AEs, including cholecystitis (2.5% vs 2.6%). In a subanalysis restricted to prospective studies and unresectable diseases, the rate of RBO was comparable between FC-SEMSs (27.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 23.7-31.2], I2 = 35.34%) and PC-SEMSs (25.3% [95% CI, 20.2-30.7], I2 = 85.09%), despite small differences (d-values between .186 and .216) in the rate of ingrowth (.5% vs 2.9%) favoring FC-SEMSs and migration (9.8% vs 4.3%) favoring PC-SEMSs. TRBO was shorter for FC-SEMSs (238 days [95% CI, 191-286], I2 = 63.1%) versus PC-SEMSs (369 days [95% CI, 290-449], I2 = 71.9%; d-value = .116).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite considerable heterogeneity and small standardized differences, PC-SEMSs consistently exhibited longer TRBO than FC-SEMSs across analyses, without any other differences in AE rates, potentially proposing PC-SEMSs as the standard comparator and TRBO as the primary outcome for future randomized studies on dMBO. (Clinical trial registration number: CRD42023393965.).

Metal vs plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with periampullary cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Metal stents (MS) are recommended for preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in patients with periampullary cancer, but whether MS are superior in terms of re-intervention and direct cost is debatable. This study aimed to compare the effects of MS and PS on the outcomes of patients with periampullary cancer.

METHODS

For this random-effects meta-analysis, electronic databases were screened for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until January 2022. Subgroup analyses were performed basis on the center type and presence of NAC.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, seven RCTs (440 participants) were included. MS reduced re-interventions (risk ratio [RR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25-0.72) and direct costs (mean difference = -474 USD, 95% CI = -656 to -292). PBD-related complications (RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.32-1.71) and postoperative complications (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.45-1.17) did not differ between MS and PS. Compared PS, MS reduced postoperative complications in high-volume centers (RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.49-0.84) and PBD-related complications in patients receiving NAC (RR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.08-1.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Metal stents likely reduces re-interventions and direct costs. Further studies are needed to confirm the effects of MS on the outcomes.

Prevention of pancreatitis after stent implantation for distal malignant biliary strictures: systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Biliary stent placement remains a palliative treatment for patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary strictures (DMBS). The incidence of post-ERCP-pancreatitis (PEP) significantly increases in patients receiving fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) who undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of prevention of PEP after stent implantation for DMBSs. The following operational variables were evaluated: (1) stent type (plastic or metal stent); (2) stent location (above or across the sphincter of Oddi); (3) prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement; (4) endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane database were searched to identify eligible studies up to October 2021. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using fixed- or random- effects models.

EXPERT OPINION

1. PEP occurs more frequently in DMBS patients with self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) compared to that plastic stent (PS). 2. The PEP incidence is higher in covered stents than that in uncovered self-expandable metal stents (USEMS), but not significantly. 3. PEP incidence increases in patients receiving transpapillary FCSEMS placement, particularly when there is an absence of pancreatic duct dilation, and prophylactic pancreatic stenting is recommended for these patients. 4. Limited studies with small sample indicate that there is no significant difference in PEP incidence between transpapillary and suprapapillary stents placement for DMBS. 5. Limited studies indicate that EST does not significantly affect the incidence of pancreatitis in DMBS patients.

Plastic or self-expandable metal stent: Which is the most suitable for patients with pancreatic head cancer in the upcoming era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy? A review

Obstructive jaundice is a major symptom of pancreatic head cancer, and although its amelioration is required before scheduling chemotherapy, the decision to perform biliary drainage for resectable pancreatic cancer has remained controversial. In recent years, the effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer has been reported. Preoperative biliary drainage has become increasingly necessary, making the choice of stent an important one; thus, the longer the waiting period extends through neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the more durable stents - such as self-expandable metallic stents, rather than plastic stents - would be desired as an option. Still, there is insufficient evidence regarding surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis, and further confirmatory studies are needed. Through this review, we aim to provide an update on the characteristics of biliary stents and preoperative biliary drainage for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer.

Comparison of metal stents versus plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage: a meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Although routine preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is generally not recommended for patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO), it is still necessary in many cases. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of metal stents (MSs) and plastic stents (PSs) on PBD in patients with MDBO.

METHODS

All the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared MS with PS for PBD and published from the date of database establishment to September 2020 were identified by searching the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases.

RESULTS

Five RCTs involving 445 patients were included. There were 201 cases in the MS group, with 244 in the PS group. Re-interventions (relative risk (RR) = 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.75, P = 0.004), stent occlusions (RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.75, P = 0.006), postoperative complications (RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.97, P = 0.03) and preoperative cholangitis (RR = 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.78, P = 0.02) were lower in the MS group than in the PS group. Preoperative pancreatitis (RR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.06-4.19, P = 0.03) was higher in the MS group than in the PS group. No significant difference was observed in the overall preoperative complications, postoperative pancreatic fistulas, delayed gastric emptying, wound infections and postoperative bleeding between these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MS and PS exerted a similar effect on PBD, but PS had a higher risk of preoperative stent obstruction and postoperative complications, requiring more frequent interventions preoperatively. However, larger sample and higher quality RCTs are necessary for further verification.

The diagnostic value of C-reactive protein for predicting pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy

INTRODUCTION

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is the preferred treatment of neoplasms in the pancreas and duodenum. Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a critical complication. A potential predictive marker is C-reactive protein. This retrospective study examined the predictive value of C-reactive protein as a marker for development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas.

METHODS

All patients who had a pancreaticoduodenectomy from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019, were included. Levels of the biomarker and linear trajectory were determined for postoperative days one to four. Univariate analysis was used to identify predictive variables for a postoperative pancreatic fistula. Receiver operating characteristics curves, specificity, and sensitivity were calculated.

RESULTS

Five hundred and fifty-two patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. C-reactive protein level greater than 121.5mg/L on the third postoperative day and an increase in C-reactive protein level between the first and fourth postoperative days, greater than 21.7mg/L, seemed to be reliable predictors. For Grade C postoperative pancreatic fistulas, increases in C-reactive protein, greater than 40.6ml/L the first four postoperative days, had a sensitivity of 100%. White blood cell count did not have similar reliability in predicting postoperative pancreatic fistulas.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that small rises in C-reactive protein during the first postoperative days after pancreaticoduodenectomy are associated with an increased risk of developing postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Nationwide practice and outcomes of endoscopic biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic head and periampullary cancer

BACKGROUND

Guidelines advise self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) over plastic stents in preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) for malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction. This study aims to assess nationwide practice and outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with pancreatic head and periampullary cancer who underwent EBD before pancreatoduodenectomy were included from the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (2017-2018). Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 575/1056 patients (62.0%) underwent preoperative EBD: 246 SEMS (42.8%) and 329 plastic stents (57.2%). EBD-related complications were comparable between the groups (44/246 (17.9%) vs. 64/329 (19.5%), p = 0.607), including pancreatitis (22/246 (8.9%) vs. 25/329 (7.6%), p = 0.387). EBD-related cholangitis was reduced after SEMS placement (10/246 (4.1%) vs. 32/329 (9.7%), p = 0.043), which was confirmed in multivariable analysis (OR 0.36 95%CI 0.15-0.87, p = 0.023). Major postoperative complications did not differ (58/246 (23.6%) vs. 90/329 (27.4%), p = 0.316), whereas postoperative pancreatic fistula (24/246 (9.8%) vs. 61/329 (18.5%), p = 0.004; OR 0.50 95%CI 0.27-0.94, p = 0.031) and hospital stay (14.0 days vs. 17.4 days, p = 0.005; B 2.86 95%CI -5.16 to -0.57, p = 0.014) were less after SEMS placement.

CONCLUSION

This study found that preoperative EBD frequently involved plastic stents. SEMS seemed associated with lower risks of cholangitis and less postoperative pancreatic fistula, but without an increased pancreatitis risk.

Effect of time to surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Achieving surgical resection is essential if patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have a chance for cure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of time to surgery on resection rates in patients with resectable PDAC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies reporting times to surgery and resection rates. Meta-regression models were then produced to assess the relationship between time to surgery and resection rates, using both intra- and inter-study comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies were included, comprising n = 2171 patients, with a pooled resection rate of 76%. Intra-study meta-analysis of the five studies that reported comparisons between patients with vs. without preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) or with long vs. short delays to surgery found earlier surgery to be associated with a significantly higher rate of resection (pooled odds ratio 1.93, 95% CI: 1.25-2.97, P = 0.003). Inter-study meta-regression across all studies found a tendency for resection rates to decline with increasing time from CT or ERCP to surgery (gradient - 0.13 log-odds per week, 95% CI - 0.28, 0.03, P = 0.100), although this did not reach statistical significance, in part due to considerable heterogeneity between studies.

CONCLUSION

Pathways to reduce the time to surgery, primarily by avoiding PBD, demonstrate significantly greater resection rates. Early surgery, including avoidance of PBD, not only provides patients with the benefit of avoiding harm associated with PBD but also with a greater chance of undergoing resection.

Bacteriobilia resistance to antibiotic prophylaxis increases morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a monocentric retrospective study of 128 patients

Several studies attempted to determine whether there is a relationship between the use of preoperative biliary drainage and morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We retrospectively evaluated post-PD outcome in patients with and without preoperative biliary drainage and the role of bacteriobilia and antibiotic prophylaxis in post-operative complications. Data relating to the PDs performed at the Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgical Department of Treviso Hospital between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Morbidity and intra-hospital mortality related to preoperative biliary stent were the primary outcomes. Between 2010 and 2017, 128 patients (mean age 68 years) underwent PD; 72 were treated with early surgery (ES) and 56 underwent preoperative biliary drainage (PBD). Overall morbidity was 50% in the ES cohort and 43% in the PBD (ns, p = 0.43). In the PBD group, bacteriobilia was found in the 100% of the bile cultures (48; 8 unavailable). The microbiota was represented by: Klebsiella spp (48%), Enterococcus spp (29%), E. coli (27%) and Candida spp (21%). In 52% of cases, at least one of the isolated bacteria was resistant to the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (69% of cases Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Ac.). The majority of postoperative surgical complications occurred in patients with prophylaxis-resistant bacteriobilia (68% vs 39%; p = 0.04). Antibiotic resistance is a determining factor in morbidity after PD. We therefore propose to pay particular attention to the preoperative prophylaxis, diversifying it between drained and non-drained patients. In fact, in the former, appropriate broad spectrum preoperative antibiotic coverage is strongly suggested.

Clinical Outcomes of Biliary Drainage during a Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Metal versus Plastic Stents

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy/neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NAC/NACRT) can be performed in patients with pancreatic cancer to improve survival. We aimed to clarify the clinical outcomes of biliary drainage with a metal stent (MS) or a plastic stent (PS) during NAC/NACRT. Between October 2013 and April 2016, 96 patients with pancreatic cancer were registered for NAC/NACRT. Of these, 29 patients who underwent biliary drainage with MS or PS before NAC/NACRT and a subsequent pancreatoduodenectomy were retrospectively analyzed with regard to patient characteristics, preoperative recurrent biliary obstruction rate, NAC/NACRT delay or discontinuation rate, and operative characteristics. The median age of the patients was 67 years. NAC and NACRT were performed in 14 and 15 patients, respectively, and MS and PS were used in 17 and 12 patients, respectively. Recurrent biliary obstruction occurred in 6% and 83% of the patients in the MS and PS groups, respectively (p<0.001). NAC/NACRT delay was observed in 35% and 50% of the patients in the MS and PS groups, respectively (p=0.680). NAC/NACRT discontinuation was observed in 12% and 17% of the patients in the MS and PS groups, respectively (p=1.000). The operative time in the MS group tended to be longer than that in the PS group (625 minutes vs 497 minutes, p=0.051), and the operative blood loss volumes and postoperative adverse event rates were not different between the two groups. MS was better than PS from the viewpoint of preventing recurrent biliary obstruction, although MS was similar to PS with regards to perioperative outcomes.

Preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Controversy remains about the best pre-operative management of jaundice in patients with resectable pancreatic head cancer (RPC) undergoing planned pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare rates of post-operative complications in patients undergoing four pre-operative approaches (POA): preoperative biliary drainage with plastic stent (PBD-PS), metal stent (PBD-MS), and percutaneous transhepatic drain (PBD-PT), or no pre-operative biliary drainage (NPBD).

METHOD

A study was included in the systematic review if it assessed the effects of PBD on post-operative outcomes in jaundiced patients with RPC. Endpoints were the rate of any post-operative complication, wound infection, intra-abdominal infection and post-operative bleeding. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to rank the POAs from the best to worst, for each outcome.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies were included in the systematic review. Ten out of 32 studies included in the systematic review reported at least one of the 4 outcomes of interest and thus were used for NMA. The calculated odds ratios and P-scores ranked NPBD as the best approach. There was insufficient evidence to determine the best modality of PBD among PBD-PS, PBD-MS and PBD-PT.

CONCLUSIONS

No preoperative biliary drainage may be the best management of preoperative jaundice in patients with RPC before PD. Further studies are needed to determine the best modality in patients that need PBD.

Comparison of Metal and Plastic Stents for Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Resectable and Borderline Resectable Periampullary Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and System Review

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the plastic stents with metal stents for preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in terms of the rate of endoscopic reintervention and PBD-related pre- and postoperative complications in patients with resectable and borderline resectable periampullary cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library database to identify relevant available articles from their inception to September 2017. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to compare the incidence of endoscopic reintervention and stent-related complications between the plastic and metal stents groups. Also, we used RevMan 5.3 to perform the pooled analyses.

RESULTS

Four trials (three randomized controlled trials [RCT] and one prospective clinical trial) with 392 patients were included. One hundred seventy-four patients received metal stents for PBD, and 218 patients received plastic stents. The metal stents group had a significant lower rate of endoscopic reintervention (OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.13-0.73, P = .008) and preoperative cholangitis (OR = 3.60, 95% CI = 1.62-7.98, P = .002) compared with the plastic stents group. But there was a significantly higher rate of PBD-related pancreatitis (OR = 3.60, 95% CI = 1.62-7.98, P = .002) in the metal stents group.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis revealed that metal stents have significantly lower rate of reintervention and cholangitis than plastic stents. But plastic stents have an obvious superiority over metal stents in terms of the incidence of preoperative pancreatitis. More RCTs are required to support this conclusion and provide more detailed information about the complications and treatment. Meanwhile, a uniform standard for the PBD is required in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction.