[The Würzburg questionnaire for assessing the quality of hearing in CI-children (WH-CIK)]

Similar performance in sound localisation with unsynchronised and synchronised automatic gain controls in bilateral cochlear implant recipients

OBJECTIVE

One proposed method to improve sound localisation for bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) users is to synchronise the automatic gain control (AGC) of both audio processors. In this study we tested whether AGC synchronisation in a dual-loop front-end processing scheme with a 3:1 compression ratio improves sound localisation acuity.

DESIGN

Source identification in the frontal hemifield was tested in in an anechoic chamber as a function of (roving) presentation level. Three different methods of AGC synchronisation were compared to the standard unsynchronised approach. Both root mean square error (RMSE) and signed bias were calculated to evaluate sound localisation in the horizontal plane.

STUDY SAMPLE

Six BiCI users.

RESULTS

None of the three AGC synchronisation methods yielded significant improvements in either localisation error or bias, neither across presentation levels nor for individual presentation levels. For synchronised AGC, the pooled mean (standard deviation) localisation error of the three synchronisation methods was 24.7 (5.8) degrees RMSE, for unsynchronised AGC it was 27.4 (7.5) degrees. The localisation bias was 5.1 (5.5) degrees for synchronised AGC and 5.0 (3.8) for unsynchronised.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings do not support the hypothesis that the tested AGC synchronisation configurations improves localisation acuity in bilateral users of MED-EL cochlear implants.

Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children: Long-Term Outcome in the Adult Population With Special Emphasis on the Bilateral Benefit

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the benefit of bilateral cochlear implantation in adults, who had been implanted being a child under the age of 10 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective data analysis.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center with a large cochlear implant program.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Speech understanding in the Freiburg monosyllabic words in quiet and the HSM sentence test in quiet and in background noise.

PATIENTS

Seventy-seven bilaterally cochlear implantation implanted adults.

RESULTS

Bilateral cochlear implantation in children under the age of 10 years results in a significant benefit in speech comprehension in adulthood. In addition, a dependency regarding the time between the implantations and speech intelligibility was found.

CONCLUSION

The results emphasize the benefit of bilateral cochlear implantation with a short interval between the operations in young children not only during formative years but also in adulthood.

[Development of a German version of the Functioning After Pediatric Cochlear Implantation (FAPCI) questionnaire]

BACKGROUND

The Functioning After Pediatric Cochlear Implantation (FAPCI) instrument was recently developed to determine the communicative performance of 2-5-year-old prelingually deafened, cochlear-implanted children. Because of its high reliability and validity, as well as possible additional information compared with existing questionnaires, the 23-item parent-proxy questionnaire was translated from U.S. English to German prior to validation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Initially, the German inventory was qualitatively developed by experts in audiology and speech pathology in collaboration with a professional American translator. Based on a sample of parents' responses, the outcome was quantitatively validated using psychometric methods (Cronbach's alpha, principal components analysis). Finally, the nomological validity was verified by correlating the overall FAPCI value with an external criterion (i.e., hearing age).

RESULTS

For almost all age groups, Cronbach's alpha exceeded the minimum value of the original study (0.86). Principal components analysis revealed a two-factor solution (speech perception/production). The fitting of a nonparametric regression line to the data points showed that the total FAPCI score was positively associated with the time of implant use.

CONCLUSION

The results show concordance between the German and the English versions of the FAPCI. The two instruments agree in reliability as well as in validity. The suitability of the German version in the clinical and therapeutic routine needs to be confirmed in further investigations.

Functional outcome of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in young children: 36 months postoperative results

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) on the life of young children after 36 months of bilateral implant use.

METHOD

Thirty-five children were assessed prior to and 3 until 36 months after activation of the second CI. Main outcome measures were: the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR), communication mode, classroom placement, parent reports and the Würzburg questionnaire. Results were analysed separately for children younger and older than 6 years at the time of the second implantation.

RESULTS

At the 3-year test interval, 80% of the younger children attended mainstream schools and were comprehensible for all listeners. They all used oral communication and almost 70% of them could have a conversation over the telephone. After 3 years of bilateral implant use less than 50% of the older children obtained the highest score on the SIR and CAP. Approximately 70% of them was integrated in mainstream schools and used oral communication. All parents reported a more natural communication and an improved quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential bilateral implantation seems to offer a wide range of participation benefits to all children and facilitates the social intercourse with their hearing environment.

The benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children

CONCLUSION

Sequential bilateral implantation offers listening advantages demonstrable on speech recognition in noise and for lateralization. Whilst the trend was for shorter inter-implant intervals and longer implant experience to positively impact binaural advantage, we observed no contraindications for binaural advantage.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation over unilateral implantation in a multicentre study evaluating speech recognition in noise and lateralization of sound.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty children, implanted bilaterally in sequential procedures, had the following characteristics: they were native German-speaking, were3 years or older and had a minimum of 1 year inter-implant interval and had between 2 months and 4 years 7 months binaural listening experience. Binaural advantage was assessed including speech recognition in noise using the Regensburg modification of the Oldenburger Kinder-Reimtest (OLKI) and lateralization of broadband stimuli from three speakers.

RESULTS

A significant binaural advantage of 37% was observed for speech recognition in noise. Binaural lateralization ability was statistically superior for the first and second implanted ear (p = 0.009, p = 0.001, respectively). Binaural experience was shown to correlate moderately with absolute binaural speech recognition scores, with binaural advantage for speech recognition and with binaural lateralization ability. The time interval between implants correlated in an inverse direction with binaural advantage for speech recognition.

Bilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angle

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate sound localization acuity in a group of children who received bilateral (BI) cochlear implants in sequential procedures and to determine the extent to which BI auditory experience affects sound localization acuity. In addition, to investigate the extent to which a hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear can also provide benefits on this task.

DESIGN

Two groups of children participated, 13 with BI cochlear implants (cochlear implant + cochlear implant), ranging in age from 3 to 16 yrs, and six with a hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (cochlear implant + hearing aid), ages 4 to 14 yrs. Testing was conducted in large sound-treated booths with loudspeakers positioned on a horizontal arc with a radius of 1.5 m. Stimuli were spondaic words recorded with a male voice. Stimulus levels typically averaged 60 dB SPL and were randomly roved between 56 and 64 dB SPL (+/-4 dB rove); in a few instances, levels were held fixed (60 dB SPL). Testing was conducted by using a "listening game" platform via computerized interactive software, and the ability of each child to discriminate sounds presented to the right or left was measured for loudspeakers subtending various angular separations. Minimum audible angle thresholds were measured in the BI (cochlear implant + cochlear implant or cochlear implant + hearing aid) listening mode and under monaural conditions.

RESULTS

Approximately 70% (9/13) of children in the cochlear implant + cochlear implant group discriminated left/right for source separations of <or=20 degrees , and, of those, 77% (7/9) performed better when listening bilaterally than with either cochlear implant alone. Several children were also able to perform the task when using a single cochlear implant, under some conditions. Minimum audible angle thresholds were better in the first cochlear implant than the second cochlear implant listening mode for nearly all (8/9) subjects. Repeated testing of a few individual subjects over a 2-yr period suggests that robust improvements in performance occurred with increased auditory experience. Children who wore hearing aids in the nonimplanted ear were at times also able to perform the task. Average group performance was worse than that of the children with BI cochlear implants when both ears were activated (cochlear implant + hearing aid versus cochlear implant + cochlear implant) but not significantly different when listening with a single cochlear implant.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with sequential BI cochlear implants represent a unique population of individuals who have undergone variable amounts of auditory deprivation in each ear. Our findings suggest that many but not all of these children perform better on measures of localization acuity with two cochlear implants compared with one and are better at the task than children using the cochlear implant + hearing aid. These results must be interpreted with caution, because benefits on other tasks as well as the long-term benefits of BI cochlear implants are yet to be fully understood. The factors that might contribute to such benefits must be carefully evaluated in large populations of children using a variety of measures.